. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Public Health Nutr. 2015 Oct 6;19(8):1405–1416. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002888

Table 3.

Patterns of use of food sources destinations most often used for household food acquisition among low-income AA households in Baltimore City (n=298)

Households	Food sources destinations
Households	Factor 1^†	Factor 2^†	Factor 3^†	Factor 4^†	Factor 5^†	Factor 6^†	Factor 7^†
Total	local carry-out (0.85)	supermarket or grocery store (0.77)	street food vendor (0.80)	sit-down restaurant, bar or pubs (0.64)	public market (0.75)	local or urban farm stand (−0.74)	Arabber or m obile produce cart (0.63)
	chain fast-food restaurant (0.74)	wholesale food store (0.62)	family and friends (0.70)	Virtual Supermarket program (0.63)	specialty store (0.74)		Food pantry (−0.66)
	local corner store (0.69)
Variance^‡	11.06%	9.43%	9.06%	8.06%	7.88%	6.63%	6.50%

Mean (SD) ^§ ^*

Food Secure (n=174)	−0.01 (1.04)	0.03 (1.03)	0.04 (1.20)	0.03 (1.00)	−0.01 (1.10)	0.04 (0.79)	−0.09 (0.94)
Food Insecure without hunger (n=87)	−0.00 (0.99)	−0.11 (0.88)	−0.03 (0.63)	−0.19 (0.80)	0.03 (0.90)	−0.10 (1.39)	0.07 (0.69)
Food Insecure with hunger (n=37)	0.05 (0.87)	0.01 (0.90)	−0.13 (0.64)	0.67 (1.31)	−0.03 (0.73)	0.03 (0.85)	0.29 (1.64)

^†

Factors extracted by Principal Component Analysis adopting eigenvalues >1.0 criterion. Factor loading (FL) value according to patterns extracted using rotation method Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. FL (in brackets) value >0.6 were maintained in the pattern.

^‡

Variance explained (%) of each factor retained. Cumulative variance of the 7 obtained factors: 58.61%.

^§

One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test to compare the groups

No significant differences were found between groups (p-value < 0.05)