Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Jan 24;142(5):922–932. doi: 10.1017/S095026881400003X

Table 2. GRADE evidence profile.

Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality Importance
No of
studies
Design Risk of
bias
Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other
considerations
Hand hygiene
versus control
(Combined data)
Relative
(95%
CI)
Absolute
Laboratory confirmed influenza (follow-up 2 to 19 months; assessed with: Nasal and/or throat swab specimen collected for RT-RCT or Quick-Vue test)
9 Randomised trial1 No serious risk of bias2,3,4 No serious inconsistency5 No serious indirectness6 Serious7 Strong association8 415/26426 (1.6%) 613/29440 (2.1%) RR 0.79 (0.61 to 1.02) 5 fewer per 1000 (from 9 fewer to 1 more) ○,+○,+○,+○,+ HIGH CRITICAL
Clinically diagnosed influenza-like-illness (follow-up 2 to 19 months; assessed with: FARI definition (Fever AND sore throat AND/OR cough))
10 Randomised trials1 No serious risk of bias9,10,11 No serious inconsistency5 No serious indirectness12 Serious13 None 2171/26490 (8.2%) 3094/29505 (10.5%) RR 0.95 (0.77 to 1.17) 5 fewer per 1000 (from 24 fewer to 18 more) ○,+○,+○,+ O MODERATE IMPORTANT