Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Healthc Eng. 2016;2016:10.1155/2016/3617572. doi: 10.1155/2016/3617572

Table 2.

Comparison of sequencing instruments

Characteristic MiSeq PacBio RS II Ion S5 HiSeq 4000 454 GS FLX Titanium XL+ SOLiD 5500xl W Sanger Genetic Analyzer 3500xL
Instrument price ~$125 K ~$695 K ~$65 K ~$900 K ~$500 K ~$595 K ~$173 K
Sequencing mechanism Sequencing-by-synthesis Single molecule, real-time sequencing Semiconductor sequencing Sequencing-by-synthesis Pyrosequencing Oligonucleotide ligation Dideoxynucleotide chain termination
Sequencing application Targeted Targeted; transcriptome profiling Targeted; whole exome; transcriptome profiling Whole exome/genome; transcriptome profiling Whole exome/genome; transcriptome profiling Whole exome/genome; transcriptome profiling Next-generation sequencing validation, targeted sequencing of mutations or small insertions/deletions
Maximum read length 300 bp PE 10,000 bp 200 bp 150 bp PE 700 bp 75 bp SE, 50 bp mate-paired 850 bp
Reads per run 15 million 55 – 900 K 60 – 80 million 2.5 – 5 billion ~1 million 100 million–4.8 billion Not applicable
Output data per run 0.5 – 15 Gb 0.5 – 16 Gb ~44 Gb 125 – 1500 Gb ~0.7 Gb 160 – 320 Gb 2 – 100 Kb
Run time 4 – 55 hours 6 hours 1 – 2 days <1 – 3.5 days 23 hours 2 – 7 days 0.5 – 3 hours
Advantages Low error rate; short run time Long read length; short run time Short run time; low start-up cost Low error rate; high throughput Long read length Low error rate Low error rate; long read length
Disadvantages Higher cost per base compared to HiSeq instruments Medium/high cost per base High error rate for homopolymer tracts and insertions/deletions Short read length High error rate for homopolymer tracts Short read length; long run time High cost per base; low throughput

bp, base pairs; Gb, gigabases; K, thousand; Kb, kilobases; PE, paired-end; SE, single-end.