Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Bull. 2009 Jan;35(1):182–196. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn158

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Illustration of the main events (a), response categories and outcome (b) of the SAT as used in rats and illustration of performance data from SAT and dSAT sessions (c-h; base task performance: black lines, squares; distractor condition: orange lines, triangles; data from Wistar rats; the presence of the distractor in blocks 2 and 3 is indicated by the oranges block on the abscissa). The performance in signal and non-signal trials is collapsed into one measure of performance, the SAT/dSAT scores (Figure 2h). SAT/dSAT scores are calculated for each signal duration (e.g., 500, 50, 25 ms; SAT/dSAT500,50,25) on the basis of the relative number of hits (h) and false alarms (f), in accordance with this formula: (SAT/dSAT=[(h-f)/2(h+f)-(h+f)2]) and then averaged over all signal durations, yielding a single overall score (Figure 2h). The formula is a variation of the non-parametric calculation of signal sensitivity (SI; Frey & Colliver, 1973). SI is based on the probabilities for hits and false alarms. In contrast, the calculation of SAT/dSAT scores is based on the relative number of hits and false alarms, thereby removing the confounding effects of omissions from this performance measure. SAT/dSAT scores range from -1 to +1. Values of 0 indicate randomized lever section, +1 indicates perfect response accuracy in signal and non-signal trials, and -1 indicates complete inaccuracy. The scores shown in Figure 2h are averaged over all signal durations and depicted by block to visualize the contrast between SAT and dSAT scores.