Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2017 Jul;28(4):529–536. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000579

Table 1.

Comparison of the estimated causal odds ratio using the trend-in-trend design and the cohort study method. The population is stratified into five subgroups for the trend-in-trend algorithm. Confounders are sampled only once and fixed over time. CPE indicates cumulative probability of exposure, SD standard deviation.

Number of Unmeasured Confounders C-statistic of the CPE Model Trend-in-Trend Odds Ratio Cohort Study Odds Ratio
Mean (% bias) SD* Mean (% bias) SD*

2.5 0 0.68 2.47 (−1.2) 0.0165 2.50 (0.0) 0.0092
2.5 2 0.63 2.45 (−2.0) 0.0170 4.75 (90.0) 0.0091
2.5 4 0.51 2.43 (−2.8) 0.0171 4.80 (92.0) 0.0091

2.0 0 0.68 1.97 (−1.5) 0.0147 2.01 (0.5) 0.0087
2.0 2 0.63 1.95 (−2.5) 0.0153 4.22 (111) 0.0081
2.0 4 0.51 1.94 (−3.0) 0.0131 4.25 (113) 0.0078

1.5 0 0.68 1.52 (1.3) 0.0101 1.50 (0.0) 0.0083
1.5 2 0.63 1.49 (−0.7) 0.0106 3.25 (117) 0.0081
1.5 4 0.51 1.48 (−1.3) 0.0108 3.30 (120) 0.0082

1.0 0 0.68 1.02 (2.0) 0.0082 0.99 (−1.0) 0.0079
1.0 2 0.63 1.02 (2.0) 0.0089 2.08 (108) 0.0074
1.0 4 0.51 1.02 (2.0) 0.0089 2.20 (120) 0.0073