Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 31.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Apr 30;36(8):2890–2900. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22815

Table 1.

Mean and standard deviation task performances for participants taking part in behavioral-only and neuroimaging sessions.

Variable Behavioral-only
M ± SD
53 participants
Neuroimaging
M ± SD
16 participants
Age in years 9.04 ± 1.84 9.28 ± 1.56
Behavioral measures
 Phonological Awareness Raw Score 15.58 ± 4.04 15.63 ± 4.21
 Phonological Awareness Standard Scorea 12.23 ± 2.62 11.75 ± 2.02
 Morphological Awareness Raw Scoreb 27.06 ± 2.25 27.94 ± 1.24
 Reading Raw Score 68.79 ± 17.98 72.13 ± 20.19
 Reading Standard Score 115.12 ± 10.89 116.09 ± 11.31
 KBIT-2 Standard Score 113.2 ± 10.84 115.94 ± 12
 Morphology Condition (% correct)c 82.38 ± 10.43 82.03 ± 11.78
 Morphology Condition RT (ms.)c 2,642± 389 2,698± 353
In-scanner task performanced 76.67 ± 11.44
 Morphology Condition (% correct)
 Morphology Condition RT (ms) 2,599 ± 205
 Control Match Condition (% correct) 94.72 ± 16.02
 Control Match Condition RT (ms) 2,406 ± 257

Note. Mean performance scores are presented separately for those who completed behavioral-only, and for those who completed neuroimaging and behavioral.

a

This subtest standard score is based on a mean of 10 rather than 100.

b

Two children in the behavioral-only group did not complete this task due to failure to complete practice trials correctly. The morphology task included a total of 30 items; that is, 2 subtests of decomposition (18 items) and derivational (12 items) morphology.

c

Task performance for 7 children in the behavioral-only group and 1 child in the neuroimaging group is missing due to technical error, experimenter error, and/or participant not passing practice trials.

d

In-scanner task accuracy performance for 1 participant and response time for 2 participants are missing due to technical error.