Fig. 8.

(A) Statistical values $-{\text{log}}_{10}(\mathrm{p})$, which were identified by performing ANCOVA on each FC’s strengths in the dominant SSs of the four groups. (B) Partial eta squared (reflecting effect size) of each FC in the dominant SS, tested by ANCOVA. (C) The visualization of the 166 discriminative FCs (p < 0.01 with Bonferroni correction). (D) 22 FCs which showed decreasing trends in the dominant SS from HC to BPP to SAD to SZ, measured by the mean connectivity strength. (E) 34 FCs which had increasing trends in the dominant SS from HC to BPP to SAD to SZ, measured by the mean connectivity strength. (F) 14 FCs which showed significant difference in HC vs. SAD, HC vs. SZ, BPP vs. SAD, and BPP vs. SZ, tested by two-sample t-tests (p < 0.01 with Bonferroni correction). In (C)-(F), the thickness of each line reflects the associated F-value in ANCOVA.