Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Rev. 2016 May 17;116(13):7501–7528. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00644

Table 4.

Comparison between the Percentage Scores of MB-pol and Several DFT Models Computed Using the Scoring Scheme Introduced in ref 259a

model
fssmono(cm-1)
Ebdim(meV)
Ebring(meV)
EsubIh(meV)
ΔEbprism-ring(meV)
ΔEbIh-VIII(meV)
ROOdim(Å)
VeqIh(Å3)
VeqVIII(Å3)
total
reference 3812–3835b 217.6 319 610 13 33 2.909–2.9127b 32 19.1
MB-pol 3833 215.2 309.5 614 22.5 15 2.92 31.61 18.64
90, 100 100 100 100 100 90 90, 100 90 80 93, 96
LDA 60 0 0 10 0 14
PBE 50 100 80 80 0 0 100 70 20 56
BLYP 20 70 80 50 0 0 60 100 0 42
PBE0 80 100 90 90 0 0 90 70 40 62
revPBE-DRSLL 30 70 60 50 100 100 0 30 0 49
optPBE-DRSLL 40 100 100 50 100 100 60 90 30 74
optB88-DRSLL 60 100 90 20 100 100 50 50 100 74
rPW86-DF2 20 100 100 100 100 100 40 50 0 68
PBE-TS 50 80 60 0 100 40 90 30 50 56
PBE0-TS 80 90 80 40 100 60 90 40 70 72
BLYP-D3 20 100 90 30 100 40 70 50 90 66
a

If not indicated otherwise, all reference values and DFT scores are taken from Table X of ref 259. Also listed as reference values (second entries) are the harmonic frequency of the monomer symmetric stretch and oxygen–oxygen distance in the water dimer calculated in ref 302. For MB-pol, the first entry corresponds to the value calculated for each property, while the second and, when available, third entries are the percentage scores relative to the corresponding reference values. The reader is referred to ref 259 for specific details about the scoring scheme and a complete discussion of the DFT results.

b

From ref 302.