Table 2.
Quality assessment of BNHEV3 and BNHEV4. Comparisons between log-likelihood values (within shaded and unshaded row pairs).
|
HEV-infected host |
Log-likelihood testsa |
HEV3 log- likelihood |
HEV4 log- likelihood |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | log(P(D80%|BNHuman) | 8.63 | 28.85 |
| log(P(D20%|BNHuman) | 7.07 | 24.84 | |
|
|
|||
| log(P(D100%|BNHuman) | 8.28 | 27.67 | |
| 1og(P(DSwine|BNHuman)b | 24.22 | 141.99 | |
|
|
|||
| Swine | log(P(D80%|BNSwine) | 6.16 | 8.03 |
| log(P(D20%|BNSwine) | 7.95 | 6.76 | |
|
|
|||
| log(P(D100%|BNSwine) | 6.29 | 13.17 | |
| log(P(DHuman|BNSwine)c | 22.62 | 72.38 | |
a
Statistical tests were performed on networks shown in Fig. 6.
b
BN learned using data of HEV variants sampled from humans (BNHuman) were tested on HEV data sampled from swine (DSwine).
c
BN learned from swine data (BNSwine) was tested on HEV data sampled from humans (DHuman).