. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 24.

Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 May 17;6(16):10.1002/adhm.201700383. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700383

Table 1.

Comparison of EC₅₀ values as a function of increasing concentration of reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Calibration needs to be performed before each experimental set to determine linear range of detection. CI, confidence interval.

Detection method	[RNS]	EC₅₀^a)	95% CI^a)	R²	Linear range of detection^a)
P1–FPs	ONOO⁻	15.4	13.5–17.5	0.981	≈1–30
P2–FPs	ONOO⁻	8.3	7.8–8.9	0.994	≈0.5–15
P3–FPs	ONOO⁻	34.7	33.4–36.0	0.998	≈4–65
P4–FPs	ONOO⁻	87.1	80.5–94.2	0.989	≈8–125
Griess assay	NO₂⁻	33.2	28.8–38.2	0.996	≈2–100
DAF-Fm	NO	57.4	55.1–59.9	0.995	≈0.1–100

^a)

Concentrations represented in micromolar (× 10⁻⁶ M).