Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 1;152(10):944–950. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1716

Table 2.

Unadjusted Scores and Adjusted Difference Scores of BREAST-Q Patient-Reported Outcomes

BREAST-Q measure Cohort Un-adjusted Scores, mean (SD) Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) a (fat grafted - not fat grafted)


Baseline One year post-op Two years post-op One year post-op P Value Two years post-op P Value
Satisfaction with breast Fat grafted 58.7 (21.5) 60.1 (16.7) 65.6 (17.1) −4.74 (−8.21, −1.28) 0.008 −0.68 (−4.42, 3.06) 0.719
Not fat grafted 59.2 (22.5) 66.1 (17.2) 66.0 (18.3)
Psychosocial well-being Fat grafted 68.4 (18.7) 67.2 (19.3) 73.2 (19.2) −3.87 (−7.33, −0.40) 0.029 −0.59 (−3.92, 2.74) 0.728
Not fat grafted 68.8 (18.5) 73.5 (19.2) 75.3 (19.1)
Physical well-being Fat grafted 77.2 (16.0) 72.5 (13.5) 74.8 (15.2) −1.23 (−3.71, 1.25) 0.330 −0.50 (−3.36, 2.36) 0.729
Not fat grafted 78.4 (14.7) 76.2 (14.9) 76.8 (14.9)
Sexual well-being Fat grafted 55.7 (20.3) 48.0 (20.5) 52.8 (20.9) −5.59 (−9.70, −1.47) 0.008 −2.94 (−7.01, 1.12) 0.154
Not fat grafted 54.4 (20.9) 54.7 (21.0) 55.4 (21.9)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.

a

Based on mixed-effects regression models with each PRO measure at one or two years post-op as the dependent variable; Each model included an indicator for fat grafting between year one and two as the primary predictor, and included as covariates baseline PRO, age, BMI, procedure type, laterality, indication for mastectomy, timing of reconstruction, radiation, smoking history, race, ethnicity, prior fat grafting before year 1 PRO measurements, concurrent revision procedure, cancer recurrence, and prior complication; Also included are random intercepts for study sites (hospitals) and an interaction variable between fat grafting and concurrent revision procedures; Analyses were performed and combined using 10 imputed data sets.