Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 30.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Res Nurs. 2016 Mar 8;18(4):370–385. doi: 10.1177/1099800416629209

Table 1.

Differences in Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Between the Low and High Evening Fatigue Groups

Characteristic Total
Sample
(n=44)
Mean (SD)
Low Evening
Fatigue
(n=19; 43.2%)
Mean (SD)
High Evening
Fatigue
(n=25; 56.8%)
Mean (SD)
Statistics

Age (years) 56.1 (9.5) 57.3 (7.8) 55.2 (10.7) t=0.72, p=.474

Education (years) 16.4 (2.4) 15.9 (2.1) 16.8 (2.5) t=−1.27, p=.211

Body mass index (kg/m2) 27.1 (6.4) 25.4 (3.9) 28.4 (7.6) t=−1.64, p=.111

Karnofsky Performance Status score 80.9 (12.9) 86.3 (11.6) 76.8 (12.5) t=2.58, p=.014

Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire score 5.8 (3.5) 4.5 (2.8) 6.8 (3.8) t=−2.23, p=.031

Time since diagnosis (years) 4.6 (7.7) 5.5 (6.1) 3.9 (8.8) U, p=.142

Time since diagnosis (median, years) 0.45 3.75 0.37

Number of prior cancer treatments 2.1 (1.8) 2.8 (1.9) 1.6 (1.5) t=2.32, p=.025

Number of metastatic sites including lymph node involvement A 1.6 (1.7) 2.1 (1.9) 1.3 (1.4) t=1.56, p=.128

Number of metastatic sites excluding lymph node involvement 1.1 (1.4) 1.4 (1.5) 0.8 (1.2) t=1.26, p=.215

LFS evening fatigue score 5.6 (2.2) 3.7 (1.7) 7.1 (1.2) t=−7.66, p<.001

% (n) % (n) % (n)

Self-reported ethnicity χ2=4.96, p=.292
    White 77.3 (35) 68.4 (13) 80.0 (20)
    Asian/Pacific Islander 11.4 (5) 15.8 (3) 8.0 (2)
    Black Non-Hispanic 4.5 (2) 10.5 (2) 4.0 (1)
    Hispanic/Mixed/Other 6.8 (3) 5.3 (1) 8.0 (2)

Married or partnered (% yes) 72.7 (32) 84.2 (16) 64.0 (16) FE, p=.181

Lives alone (% yes) 15.9 (7) 10.5 (2) 20.0 (5) FE, p=.680

Currently employed (% yes) 29.5 (13) 31.6 (6) 28.0 (7) FE, p=1.00

Annual household income χ2=2.83, p=.419
    Less than $30,000 2.8 (1) 0.0 (0) 4.3 (1)
    $30,000 to $70,000 16.7 (6) 23.1 (3) 13.0 (3)
    $70,000 to $100,000 8.3 (3) 0.0 (0) 13.0 (3)
    Greater than $100,000 72.2 (26) 76.9 (10) 69.6 (16)

Exercise on a regular basis (% yes) 77.3 (34) 78.9 (15) 76.0 (19) FE, p=1.00

Child care responsibilities (% yes) 28.9 (11) 17.6 (3) 38.1 (8) FE, p=.282

Elder care responsibilities (% yes) 13.9 (5) 12.5 (2) 15.0 (3) FE, p=1.00

AJCC Status χ2=1.36, p=.715
    Stage 0 59.1 (26) 63.2 (12) 56.0 (14)
    Stage I 4.5 (2) 5.2 (1) 4.0 (1)
    Stage IIA, IIB 18.2 (8) 10.5 (2) 25.0 (6)
    Stage IIA,IIIB,IIIC,IV 18.2 (8) 21.1 (4) 16.7 (4)

Prior cancer treatmentB χ2=8.58, p=.035
    No prior treatment 14.3 (6) 11.8 (2) 16.0 (4)
    Only surgery, CTX, or RT 42.9 (18) 23.5 (4) 56.0 (14)
    Surgery and CTX, or surgery and RT, or CTX and RT 9.5 (4) 5.9 (1) 12.0 (3)
    Surgery and CTX and RT 33.3 (14) 58.8 (10) 16.0 (4)

Metastatic sites χ2=6.99, p=.073
    No metastasis 36.4 (16) 31.6 (6) 40.0 (10)
    Only lymph node metastasis 20.5 (9) 15.8 (3) 24.0 (6)
    Only metastatic disease in other sites 9.1 (4) 0.0 (0) 16.0 (4)
    Metastatic disease in lymph nodes and other sites 34.1 (15) 52.6 (10) 20.0 (5)
A

Total number of metastatic sites evaluated was 9.

B

Post-hoc contrasts failed to reveal the subgroup(s) underlying the differences in prior cancer treatments observed in the high compared to the low evening fatigue groups.

Abbreviations: AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; CTX = chemotherapy; FE = Fisher’s Exact; kg = kilograms; LFS = Lee Fatigue Scale; m2 = meters squared; SD = standard deviation; RT = radiation therapy; U = Mann-Whitney test; χ2 = Chi-square test.