. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 7.

Published in final edited form as: Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Apr 21;1(2):e23–e30. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20170329-01

Table 2. Construct Validity of Numeracy and Health Literacy Measures by Race/Ethnicity in the PRIDE Study.

Method of Assessment	All Participants	Non-Hispanic White	Non-Hispanic Black	Hispanic
Monotrait-Heteromethod
Trait: Numeracy	0.37^a	0.48^a	0.41^a	0.38^a
Subjective: SNS
Objective: DNT-5
Trait: Health literacy	0.42^a	0.49^a	0.43^a	0.13^c
Subjective: BHLS
Objective: S-TOFHLA Monomethod-Heterotrait
Method: Subjective	0.25^a	0.39^a	0.15^c	0.09^c
Numeracy: SNS
Health literacy: BHLS
Method: Objective	0.59^a	0.50^a	0.25^b	0.56^a
Numeracy: DNT-5
Health literacy: S-TOFHLA

Note. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated by comparing scores for specified measures. BHLS = Brief Health Literacy Screen; DNT-5 = Diabetes Numeracy Test; PRIDE = Partnering to Improve Diabetes Education; SNS = Subjective Numeracy Scale; S-TOFHLA = Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults.

p < .001.

p < .05.

p > .05 (not significant).