Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov 2;39(1):91–96. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5410

Table 2.

Comparison of perfusion and volumetric data for cGM, NAWM and T2h-l between HC, RRMS, and SPMS subjects after adjusting for confounding factors

Parameter HC
n=19
RRMS
n=19
SPMS
n=20
RRMS
vs HC
SPMS
vs HC
SPMS
vs
RRMS
cGM Median
(Interquartiles)
Median
(Interquartiles)
Median
(Interquartiles)
p-value p-value p-value
Global volume 890 (869, 914) 864 (827, 895) 673 (646, 697) 0.10 0.0026 0.0020
CBF 43.20 (33.91, 54.49) 41.07 (29.85, 55.68) 34.05 (27.19, 43.68) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0011
CBV 2.64 (2.02, 3.29) 2.53 (1.94, 3.37) 2.40 (1.92, 3.07) 0.078 0.046 0.0062
MTT 3.77 (3.20, 4.31) 3.90 (3.32, 4.41) 4.30 (3.66, 4.99) 0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
NAWM Global volume 878 (812, 894) 818 (738, 850) 697 (669, 729) 0.0115 0.0011 0.0049
CBF 23.49 (18.69, 27.78) 21.55 (16.05, 29.50) 19.54 (16.74, 24.92) 0.68 0.58 0.0080
CBV 1.59 (1.28, 2.00) 1.57 (1.17, 2.15) 1.51 (1.30, 1.98) 0.89 0.16 0.0103
MTT 4.51 (4.09, 5.10) 4.62 (4.08, 5.20) 4.86 (4.28, 5.41) 0.25 0.0005 0.0094
T2h-l Global volume 0.00 5.4 (1.2, 9.3) 6.4 (1.0, 10.9) NA NA 0.82
CBF 0.00 12.77 (8.23, 17.24) 11.15 (8.95, 15.71) NA NA 0.049
CBV 0.00 0.99 (0, 1.32) 1.08 (0.83, 1.47) NA NA 0.0026
MTT 0.00 4.91 (4.00, 5.63) 5.64 (4.82, 6.30) NA NA 0.43

T2h-l: T2-hyperintense lesions. Bonferroni corrected p<0.017 is considered statistically significant. Age was considered as confounding factor for comparing RRMS vs. HC, and SPMS vs. HC; age, EDSS, and disease duration were considered as confounding factors for comparing SPMS vs. RRMS. All volumes are in cm3. CBF ml/100g/m, CBVml/100g, MTT seconds