Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov 2;39(1):91–96. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5410

Table 3.

Lobar GM and WM volume differences in cm3 between HC, RRMS, and SPMS subjects after adjusting for confounding factors

Parameter HC (n=19)
Median
(Interquartiles)
RRMS (n=19)
Median
(Interquartiles)
SPMS (n=20)
Median
(Interquartiles)
RRMS
vs HC
p-value
SPMS
vs HC
p-value
SPMS
vs
RRMS
p-value
Gray Matter
Frontal Lobe 200.040 (190.352, 167.944) 199.248 (192.480, 207.896) 200.352 (193.500, 207.540) 0.69 0.60 0.22
Parietal Lobe 90.296 (83.992, 94.512) 89.824 (85.048, 95.176) 93.368 (88.956, 96.352) 0.72 0.03 0.095
Temporal Lobe 122.740 (110.640, 130.560) 121.336 (114.672, 128.544) 106.892 (99.432, 112.928) 0.86 0.0044 0.0073
Occipital Lobe 101.088 (98.536, 106.272) 97.160 (95.728, 102.960) 72.792 (69.868, 75.196) 0.10 0.0030 0.0033
White Matter
Frontal Lobe 190.568 (170.368, 201.528) 170.316 (159.520, 189.112) 146.260 (134.908, 157.136) <0.0001 0.0006 <0.0001
Parietal Lobe 101.200 (94.536, 109.152) 93.272 (84.944, 97.208) 81.952 (77.736, 87.532) 0.0001 0.0018 <0.0001
Temporal Lobe 70.132 (56.648, 79.352) 68.512 (64.116, 74.016) 61.208 (51.576, 71.720) 0.026 0.98 0.0026
Occipital Lobe 32.024 (30.248, 35.092) 29.092 (24.136, 33.768) 26.864 (23.552, 31.832) 0.65 0.0098 0.0003

Bonferroni corrected p<0.017 is considered statistically significant. Age was considered as confounding factor for comparing RRMS vs. HC, and SPMS vs. HC; age, EDSS and disease duration were considered as confounding factors for comparing SPMS vs. RRMS. All volumes are in cm3