Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Med. 2018 Jan 4;20(3):351–359. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.218

Table 1.

Summary of the adapted ACMG/AMP pathogenic and benign criteria.

Pathogenic Criteria Combination of Criteria Needed to Meet Classification
Rule Specification Type Rule Description Pathogenic Likely Pathogenic
VS PVS1 Removed Null variant in gene with established LOF as disease mechanism
STRONG PS1 No change Different nucleotide change (same amino acid) as a previously established pathogenic variant 2 1 1 1 1
PS2 Disease/gene De novo (paternity confirmed) in a patient with disease and no family history
PS3 Disease/gene Functional studies of mammalian knock-in models supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product
PS4 Disease/gene Prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls -OR- Variant identified in ≥15 probands with consistent phenotypes
PP1_Strong Modif. Strength Variant segregates with ≥7 meioses
MODERATE PM1 Disease/gene Hotspot/est. functional domain (amino acids 181–937) without benign variation 3 2 1 1 3 2
PM2 Disease/gene Absent/extremely rare (<0.004%) from large population studies
PM3 Removed Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (recessive)
PM4 No change Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions of any size in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants
PM5 No change Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change previously established as pathogenic
PM6 Disease/gene Confirmed de novo without confirmation of paternity
PVS1_Moderate Modif. Strength Null variant in gene with evidence supporting LOF as disease mechanism
PS4_Moderate Modif. Strength Variant identified in ≥6 probands with consistent phenotypes
PP1_Moderate Modif. Strength Variant segregates in ≥5 meioses
SUPPORTING PP1 Disease/gene Variant segregates in ≥3 meioses 2 4 2 2
PP2 Removed Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease
PP3 No change Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product
PP4 Removed Phenotype specific for disease with single genetic etiology
PP5 Removed Reputable source reports as pathogenic
PS4_Supporting Modif. strength Variant identified in ≥2 probands with consistent phenotypes
Benign Criteria Combination of Criteria Needed to Meet Classification
Rule Specification Type Rule Description Benign Likely Benign
SA BA1 Disease/gene Allele frequency is ≥0.1% based on the filtering allele frequency (FAF) in ExAC 1
STRONG BS1 Disease/gene Allele frequency is ≥0.02% based on the filtering allele frequency (FAF) in ExAC provided there is no conflicting information 2 1
BS2 Removed Observed in healthy adult with full penetrance expected at an early age
BS3 No change Functional studies of mammalian knock-in models supportive of no damaging effect on protein function or splicing
BS4 Disease/gene Non-segregation in affected members of a family
SUPPORTING BP1 Removed Missense variant in gene where only LOF causes disease 2
BP2 Disease/gene Observed as comp het (in trans) or double het in genes with overlapping function (e.g. sarcomere genes) without increased disease severity -OR- Observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern
BP3 Removed In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function
BP4 No change Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product
BP5 Disease/gene Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease
BP6 Removed Reputable source reports as benign
BP7 No change A silent variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site -AND- the nucleotide is not highly conserved

VS = Very Strong. SA = Stand alone. Removed - not applicable to MYH7-associated disease. Modif. strength: Modified rule strength. Numbers under each classification refer to the number of rules with that strength required to classify the variant as its header category. Example: A likely pathogenic classification may be made with 1 piece of strong and 2 pieces of supporting evidence.