Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 11.
Published in final edited form as: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Mar 15;39(4):669–677. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5570

Classification Tables for the Multivariate Binary Logistic Regression Models and Corresponding Diagnostic Performance Indicators.

DSA=0 DSA =0 DSA=1 DSA =1 Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Assessment of presence of DAVF Predicted = 0 (TN) Predicted = 1 (FP) Predicted = 0 (FN) Predicted = 1 (TP) [95% C.I. in %] [95% C.I. in %] [95% C.I. in %] [95% C.I. in %]
Structural MRI Alone 227 7 51 25 32.89% [22.33 – 43.46] 97.01% [94.83 – 99.19] 78.13% [63.80 – 92.45] 81.65% [77.10 – 86.20]
Structural MRI plus TOF MRA 219 3 17 53 75.71% [65.67 – 85.76] 98.65% [97.13 – 100.17] 94.64% [88.75 – 100.54] 92.80% [89.50 – 96.10]
Structural MRI plus TOF MRA plus ASL 214 8 8 62 88.57% [81.12 – 96.02] 96.40% [93.94 – 98.85] 88.57% [81.12 – 96.02] 96.40% [93.94 – 98.85]

Classification table was generated for a probability value of p=0.5 for each of the three multivariate models.

There is a 95% chance that the point estimate (z) of the sensitivity, specificity, PPV or NPV lies within this interval and a 5% that the true value is either below or above this interval. The 95% C.I. were computed based on z ± 1.96 × Standard Error.