Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 1;136(6):622–629. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0813

Table 2.

Success in Obtaining Eye Care Appointments by Patient, Provider Characteristics, Neighborhood Type, and State

Adult Child
Medicaid vs. BCBS
Appointment Given Medicaid (n=304) BCBS (n=299) Medicaid (n=304) BCBS (n=299)
% yes [95% CI] 62 [56, 67] 79 [75, 84] 45 [40, 51] 63 [57, 68]
Δ% 17 18
P-value <0.001 <0.001
Mean Wait Times [95% CI], in days 16 [13, 19] 15 [13, 18] 14 [11, 17] 13 [10, 16]
P-value 0.66 0.64
Ophthalmologist vs. Optometrist
Appointment Given Ophthalmologist (n=303) Optometrist (n=300) Ophthalmologist (n=303) Optometrist (n=300)
% yes [95% CI] 64 [59, 70] 76 [72, 81] 32 [27, 38] 76 [71, 81]
Δ% 12 44
P-value 0.001 <0.001
Mean Wait Times [95% CI], in days 24 [20,27] 9 [7, 11] 23 [18, 27] 10 [8, 11]
P-value <0.001 <0.001
Urban vs. Rural
Appointment Given Urban (n=413) Rural (n=190) Urban (n=413) Rural (n=190)
% yes [95% CI] 66 [62, 71] 79 [73, 85] 49 [44, 53] 65 [58, 72]
Δ% 13 16
P-value 0.002 <0.01
Mean Wait Times [95% CI], in days 15 [12, 17] 17 [14, 21] 12 [10, 15] 15 [12, 19]
P-value 0.28 0.17
Maryland vs. Michigan
Appointment Given Maryland (n=322) Michigan (n=281) Maryland (n=322) Michigan (n=281)
% yes [95% CI] 62 [57, 67] 80 [75, 84] 46 [40, 51] 63 [58, 69]
Δ% 18 17
P-value < 0.001 <0.001
Mean Wait Times [95% CI], in days 12 [10, 14] 19 [16, 23] 11 [9, 13] 16 [13, 19]
P-value <0.001 0.01