Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2018 Nov 20;46(1):5–14. doi: 10.1002/mp.13246

Table BI.

Comparison of the automated 2D-3D 3%, 3mm and 2%, 2mm γ-index results against the manual 2D-2D 3%, 3mm and 2%, 2mm γ-index analysis for a subset of 6 patient planes at prescription depth. The parallel analysis was performed with identical ROIs and scaling factors based on our detector daily warmup values.

Patient Automated Gamma
3%, 3mm (%)
Manual Gamma
3%, 3mm (%)
Automated Gamma
2%, 2mm (%)
Manual Gamma
2%, 2mm (%)
1 99.5 98.9 98.3 95.9
2 100 99.6 100 98.7
3 100 100 100 100
4 100 100 99.0 98.8
5 100 99.9 99.7 99.3
6 98.6 98.3 97.0 95.8