Table BI.
Comparison of the automated 2D-3D 3%, 3mm and 2%, 2mm γ-index results against the manual 2D-2D 3%, 3mm and 2%, 2mm γ-index analysis for a subset of 6 patient planes at prescription depth. The parallel analysis was performed with identical ROIs and scaling factors based on our detector daily warmup values.
Patient | Automated Gamma 3%, 3mm (%) |
Manual Gamma 3%, 3mm (%) |
Automated Gamma 2%, 2mm (%) |
Manual Gamma 2%, 2mm (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 99.5 | 98.9 | 98.3 | 95.9 |
2 | 100 | 99.6 | 100 | 98.7 |
3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
4 | 100 | 100 | 99.0 | 98.8 |
5 | 100 | 99.9 | 99.7 | 99.3 |
6 | 98.6 | 98.3 | 97.0 | 95.8 |