Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 17;27(42):11289–11295. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1914-07.2007

Table 1.

Devaluation performance for the two tests. The number of M&M (M) and peanut (P) objects chosen by each monkey (control monkeys, Con1-Con4; monkeys with MDmc lesions, MD1-MD5) during the baseline sessions (mean of 2 baseline sessions for each test), and for sessions preceded by devaluation of either peanuts or M&Ms.

Test 1
Test 2
Baseline Satiate
M
Satiate
P
Difference Baseline Satiate
M
Satiate
P
Difference
Case M:P M:P M:P score M:P M:P M:P score Mean
Con1 30:0 21:9 30:0 9 30:0 9:21 30:0 21 15
Con2 18.5:11.5 2:28 30:0 28 11:19 0:30 27:3 27 27.5
Con3 18:12 1:29 19:11 18 18:12 2:28 30:0 28 23
Con4 21:9 7:23 29:1 22 20:10 6:24 29:1 23 22.5
Mean 21.9:8.1 7.8:22.2 27:3 19.25 19.8:10.2 4.3:25.7 29:1 24.75 22
MD1 21:9 8:22 27:3 19 15.5:14.5 5:25 25:5 20 19.5
MD2 19.5:10.5 16:14 27:3 11 13.5:16.5 6:24 25:5 19 15
MD3 16:14 10:20 21:9 11 17.5:12.5 11;19 23:7 12 11.5
MD4 29.5:0.5 27:3 29:1 2 25.5:4.5 20:10 27:3 7 4.5
MD5 17:13 6:24 26:4 20 12:18 6:24 19:11 13 16.5
Mean 20.6:9.4 13.4:16.6 26:4 12.6 16.8:13.2 9.6:20.4 23.8:6.2 14.2 13.4