Table 4.
Analytical methods that have been used for BCP detection
| Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Imaging methods | ||
| Light and polarised microscopy | Inexpensive, widely available and useful for the larger crystals (>1 μm) that can occur | Inaccurate, non-specific and cannot detect BCP crystals. Polarised microscopy can aid detection of MSU and CPPD |
| Microscopy with staining | Inexpensive, widely available and can identify BCP crystal clumps | Sensitive but non-specific, false positive results are frequent. One dye is not enough to distinguish between the different types of crystals |
| Multi-dimensional microscopy | Coupling of multi-channel micro-spectrophotometer and 3-D relief imaging system to a microscope laser light scattering spectroscope | Not widely available. No evidence of clear identification of synovial fluid crystals |
| Transmission electron microscopy | Small sample size and can be used with electron diffraction | Expensive, complex, not widely available, operator-dependent |
| Scanning electron microscopy | Small sample size and can be coupled to X-ray elemental analysis | Expensive, complex, relies on morphology |
| Atomic force microscopy | Small sample size, minimal sample preparation. Can exploit hardness and lattice features in sample for detection and identification. Chemical force microscopy may offer more specificity | Operator-dependent, intricate to use on liquid samples, relies on morphology to an extent |
| Spectroscopic methods | ||
| FTIR | Accurate, used for automated pattern recognition methods | Can be misinterpreted and water interferes in certain parts of the spectrum |
| Raman | Accurate, water does not interfere, unique spectral signatures for each crystal type | Expensive, fewer library spectra available. Sample purification required to distinguish between various crystal types |
| Fluorescence | With correct dyes, can be very sensitive and selective | Requires special equipment; dyes can be expensive, not suitable for in vivo use |
| NMR/MRI | Can visualise most types of pathologies including crystal depositions | Very expensive, cannot identify nature of crystal deposition. Operator-dependent |
| Other methods | ||
| Calcium and phosphorus analysis | Well-understood assays such as atomic spectrometry, UV-Vis spectrophotometry, etc., can be selective and sensitive | Practical only in analysis of dissociated crystals, other matter present in the fluid can interfere |
| X-Ray diffraction | Accurate technique for unambiguous identification | Requires sample to be pure, dried and in sufficient quantity |
| Capillary electrophoresis | Can be used for pattern recognition analysis of synovial fluids containing crystals | Not applicable for direct separation of crystals |
| Radioassay | Allows semi-quantitative determination of BCP crystals | Involves radioactive reagents |
| Ferrography | Provides separation of particles by size/magnetic properties | Requires special sample preparation, only reflects general content of particles in synovial fluid |