Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 14.
Published in final edited form as: Analyst. 2008 Feb 1;133(3):302–318. doi: 10.1039/b716791a

Table 4.

Analytical methods that have been used for BCP detection

Technique Advantages Disadvantages
Imaging methods
 Light and polarised microscopy Inexpensive, widely available and useful for the larger crystals (>1 μm) that can occur Inaccurate, non-specific and cannot detect BCP crystals. Polarised microscopy can aid detection of MSU and CPPD
 Microscopy with staining Inexpensive, widely available and can identify BCP crystal clumps Sensitive but non-specific, false positive results are frequent.
One dye is not enough to distinguish between the different types of crystals
 Multi-dimensional microscopy Coupling of multi-channel micro-spectrophotometer and 3-D relief imaging system to a microscope laser light scattering spectroscope Not widely available. No evidence of clear identification of synovial fluid crystals
 Transmission electron microscopy Small sample size and can be used with electron diffraction Expensive, complex, not widely available, operator-dependent
 Scanning electron microscopy Small sample size and can be coupled to X-ray elemental analysis Expensive, complex, relies on morphology
 Atomic force microscopy Small sample size, minimal sample preparation. Can exploit hardness and lattice features in sample for detection and identification. Chemical force microscopy may offer more specificity Operator-dependent, intricate to use on liquid samples, relies on morphology to an extent
Spectroscopic methods
 FTIR Accurate, used for automated pattern recognition methods Can be misinterpreted and water interferes in certain parts of the spectrum
 Raman Accurate, water does not interfere, unique spectral signatures for each crystal type Expensive, fewer library spectra available. Sample purification required to distinguish between various crystal types
 Fluorescence With correct dyes, can be very sensitive and selective Requires special equipment; dyes can be expensive, not suitable for in vivo use
 NMR/MRI Can visualise most types of pathologies including crystal depositions Very expensive, cannot identify nature of crystal deposition. Operator-dependent
Other methods
 Calcium and phosphorus analysis Well-understood assays such as atomic spectrometry, UV-Vis spectrophotometry, etc., can be selective and sensitive Practical only in analysis of dissociated crystals, other matter present in the fluid can interfere
 X-Ray diffraction Accurate technique for unambiguous identification Requires sample to be pure, dried and in sufficient quantity
 Capillary electrophoresis Can be used for pattern recognition analysis of synovial fluids containing crystals Not applicable for direct separation of crystals
 Radioassay Allows semi-quantitative determination of BCP crystals Involves radioactive reagents
 Ferrography Provides separation of particles by size/magnetic properties Requires special sample preparation, only reflects general content of particles in synovial fluid