Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 8;31(23):8502–8511. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0208-11.2011

Fig. 11. Model components in relation to task relevance.

Fig. 11

(A) Responses centered at the target orientation were less variable for cued item when compared to baseline. There was a corresponding non-significant increase in variability for the remaining, less-task relevant items. (B) The probability of responding according to the target’s orientation was enhanced for cued items, with a corresponding cost for uncued ones. (C) Probability of responding according to a non-target orientation was lower for the more task-relevant item, while this parameter was no different from baseline for the uncued items. (D) Conversely, random responses were increased for uncued items, and they were similar to baseline for the cued item. Error bars represent SEM. **P<0.001, *P<0.05, n.s: non-significant.