Abstract
Speciation requires the evolution of barriers to gene exchange between descendant and progenitor populations. Cryptic reproductive barriers in plants arise after pollination but before fertilization as a result of pollen competition and interactions between male gametophytes and female reproductive tissues. We tested for such gametic isolation between the polyploid Chamerion angustifolium and its diploid progenitor by conducting single (diploid or tetraploid) and mixed ploidy (1 : 1 diploid and tetraploid) pollinations on both cytotypes and inferring siring success from paternity analysis and pollen-tube counts. In mixed pollinations, polyploids sired most (79%) of their own seeds as well as those of diploids (61%) (correcting for triploid block, siring success was 70% and 83%, respectively). In single donor pollinations, pollen tubes from tetraploids were more numerous than those from diploids at four different positions in each style and for both diploid and tetraploid pollen recipients. The lack of a pollen donor x recipient interaction indicates that the tetraploid siring advantage is a result of pollen competition rather than pollen-pistil interactions. Such unilateral pollen precedence results in an asymmetrical pattern of isolation, with tetraploids experiencing less gene flow than diploids. It also enhances tetraploid establishment in sympatric populations, by maximizing tetraploid success and simultaneously diminishing that of diploids through the production of inviable triploid offspring.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Burton T. L., Husband B. C. Fecundity and offspring ploidy in matings among diploid, triploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae): consequences for tetraploid establishment. Heredity (Edinb) 2001 Nov;87(Pt 5):573–582. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burton T. L., Husband B. C. Fitness differences among diploids, tetraploids, and their triploid progeny in Chamerion angustifolium: mechanisms of inviability and implications for polyploid evolution. Evolution. 2000 Aug;54(4):1182–1191. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burton TL, Husband BC. Population cytotype structure in the polyploid galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae) . Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Apr;82(Pt 4):381–390. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Husband B. C. Constraints on polyploid evolution: a test of the minority cytotype exclusion principle. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 7;267(1440):217–223. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otto S. P., Whitton J. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:401–437. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schluter D. Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):798–801. doi: 10.1126/science.266.5186.798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams J. H., Jr, Friedman W. E., Arnold M. L. Developmental selection within the angiosperm style: using gamete DNA to visualize interspecific pollen competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 3;96(16):9201–9206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]