Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
editorial
. 2007 Jan;92(1):3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.098087

The nomad testis

P Mouriquand
PMCID: PMC2083159  PMID: 17185439

Short abstract

Perspective on the paper by Hack et al(see page 17)


The abnormal position of the testis is the most common congenital anomaly of genitalia in men, with two different periods of presentation: either early in life, commonly called congenital undescended testes, or a few years later, called acquired or ascending testes. In the second group, it seems that the testis has been positioned properly at an early stage of growth, but has subsequently left its normal scrotal position to occupy the inguinal area. This group is quite controversial, as some authors considered these cases to be misdiagnoses owing to an error in physical examination.1 The cumulative experience of qualified examiners, however, suggests that this is a real phenomenon,2 which explains the increasing proportion of orchidopexies performed in late infancy.3

Browne3 used to distinguish between the testicle that chose the wrong route (ectopic testis) and the somewhat lazy testicle that stopped on the normal route of descent before reaching its final scrotal destination (dystopic testis). It is generally agreed that these testes may finish their descent after birth, up to the age of 6 months of life.5 For a long time, retractile testes were considered to be variants of normal testis, with a suprascrotal testis that could be manipulated into the scrotum and remained there without traction until the cremasteric reflex was induced. Long‐term follow‐up of these patients showed that many of them will eventually present with an undescended testis, and some stated6 that retractile testes should no longer be considered to be normal variants, as they have a 32% risk of becoming ascending or acquired undescended testes. It is probably from this group of retractile testes that most ascending testes will originate, although their pathophysiology is not entirely elucidated. The common association of an abnormal testicular descent with an abnormal resorption of the processus vaginalis has intrigued surgeons for a long time,7,8 and could be at the origin of the reascent of the testis.9 The abnormally positioned testis presenting later in childhood may be an acquired abnormality caused by a failure of the natural growth of the spermatic cord when the processus vaginalis leaves a fibrous remnant, which prevents normal elongation.9,10 Acquired undescended testis is usually characterised by its position in the superficial inguinal pouch, closed or small open processus vaginalis and normal gubernaculum attachment.11

If we accept that the ascending or acquired testis is a defined entity, the next two questions are how common it is and how it can be treated. Several extensive clinical studies have tried to evaluate the prevalence of acquired undescended testes. Hack et al12 in this issue conducted a remarkable survey of three groups of male children in the Netherlands aged 6 years (n = 2042), 9 years (n = 1038) and 13 years (n = 353). In 25 children aged 6 years, 23 children aged 9 years, and 4 children aged 13 years, a diagnosis of acquired undescended testis was made, leading to a prevalence rate of 1.2%, 2.2% and 1.1%, respectively, for acquired undescended testis. There are certain flaws in this study, as many factors may influence these data, including the quality of examination, the examiners and the history of ipsilateral or contralateral inguinal surgery. These findings should also be balanced by the fact that some so‐called undescended testes may be found to be perfectly normal when the child is put under general anaesthetia. This situation certainly happens 3–4 times a year in a department of paediatric surgery. In a previous study, Hack et al13 stated that acquired undescended testes occur at about three times the rate of congenital undescended testes, accounting for the high rate of late orchidopexy. This conclusion was supported by a review of the literature by Bathrold and Gonzales,14 who evaluated the risk of ascent to be as high as 50% in cases where one testis is markedly retractile.

The next question is whether we should treat acquired undescended testis. Hack et al15 found that 63 boys with acquired undescended testes followed through puberty, 42 had a spontaneous testicular descent, although they recommended the use of human chorionic gonadotrophin in these patients in a previous paper.16 Hormonal treatment was proved to be efficient for some,17 but not clearly effective for others.18 Everyone would agree that periodic examination of children with so‐called retractile testes is mandatory.19

It remains unclear whether one is talking about the same anomaly when the abnormal position of the testis is found early or late in life. The consequences of the malposition on the testicular development may be different with regard to the risk of cancer and to fertility. Further studies are necessary to answer these questions.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Rabinowitz R, Hulbert W C., Jr Late presentation of cryptorchidism: the etiology of testicular re‐ascent. J Urol 19971571892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Docimo S G. Testicular descent and ascent in the first year of life. Urology 199648458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Browne D. Treatment of undescended testicle. Proc R Soc Med 194942643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Donaldson K M, Tong S Y, Hutson J M. Prevalence of late orchidopexy is consistent with some undescended tetes being acquired. Indian J Pediatr 199663725–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tomiyama H, Sasaki Y, Huynh J.et al Testicular descent, cryptorchidism and inguinal hernia: the Melbourne perspective. J Ped Urol 2005111–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Agarwal P K, Diaz M, Elder J S. Retractile testis—is it really a normal variant? J Urol 20061751496–1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mollard P. ed. Ectopie et cryptorchidie in Précis d'Urologie de l'Enfant. In: Paris: Masson, 1984;334–44,
  • 8.Atwell J D. Ascent of the testis: fact or fiction. Br J Urol 198557474–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clarnette T D, Rowe D, Hasthorpe S.et al Incomplete disappearance of the processus vaginalis as a cause of ascending testis. J Urol 19971571889–1891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou Y, Takahashi G, Kono S.et al Acquired undescended testis. Int J Urol 19985504–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meijer R W, Hack W W, van der Voort‐Doedens L M.et al Surgical findings in acquired undescended testis. J Pediatr Surg 2004391242–1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hack W W M, Sijstermans K, van Dijk J.et al Prevalence of acquired undescended testis in 6‐, 9‐, and 13‐year old Dutch schoolboys. Arch Dis Child 20079217–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hack W W, Meijer R W, van der Voort‐Doedens L M.et al Previous testicular position in boys referred for an undescended testis: further explanation of the late orchidopexy enigma? BJU Int 200392293–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bathrold J S, Gonzales R. The epidemiology of congenital cryptorchidism, testicular ascent and orchiopexy. J Urol 20031702396–2401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hack W W, Meijer R W, van der Voort‐Doedens L M.et al Natural course of acquired undescended testis in boys. Br J Surg 200390728–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meijer R W, Hack W W, Haasnoot K. Successful treatment of acquired undescended testes with human chorionic gonadotropin. Eur J Pediatr 200116066–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schiffer K A, Kogan S J, Reda E F.et al Acquired undescended testes. Am J Dis Child 1987141106–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hutson J M, Hasthorpe S. Abnormalities of testicular descent. Cell Tissue Res 2005322155–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Belman A B. Acquired undescended (ascended) testis: effects of human chorionic gonadotropin. J Urol 19881401189–1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES