Abstract
Purpose:
Our study is aimed at evaluating the role of UVB light in inducing cytotoxicity in an in vitro model.
Methods:
RGC-5 and ARPE-19 cells were exposed to different time periods of UVB light: 0, 15, 30, and 45 min. They were subsequently examined for changes in cell morphology, cell viability (neutral red uptake assay), generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), expression of bax, bcl-2 and cytochome C by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and western blot, respectively.
Results:
Dose-dependent reduction in cell viability to UVB light was demonstrated with parallel increase in ROS. Increased duration of exposure (>15 minutes), was associated with increased expression of bax and cytochrome C, and absence of bcl-2 expression.
Conclusion:
UVB light exposure results in cell cytotoxicity. The concomitant generation of ROS and expression of apoptotic markers suggests the role of oxidative stress in UVB-mediated apoptosis in an in vitro model of retinal ganglion and pigment epithelial cells.
Keywords: ultraviolet light, retinal pigment epithelium, retinal ganglion cell, reactive oxygen species, cytochrome C
Introduction
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the Western world.1 Age, race, and smoking are known risk factors associated with the development of AMD.2,3 High levels of endogenous pigments, which act as photosensitizers, and increased metabolic activity in the posterior pole of the eye predisposes macula to light-induced oxidative stress and consecutive degeneration.4 Though the human retina is protected by the cornea and lens from short wavelength radiation (<400 nm), retinal damage has been reported with varying intensity, wavelength, and duration of exposure.5 Ultraviolet (UV) light induces apoptosis in the human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells.6 The underlying mechanism in the induction of apoptosis is the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).7,8 However, the effect of UV light on other retinal cell types such as ganglion cells, which are not as metabolically active as RPE, is not known. In this study we evaluated the toxic effect of UVB light on retinal ganglion and pigment epithelial cells to highlight any difference seen in these two cell lines. The toxic effect was evaluated with measurement of ROS and induction of pro-apoptotic markers.
Methods
Cell culture
Rat retinal ganglion cells (RGC-5) (courtesy of Dr. Neeraj Agarwal, UNT Health Science Center, TX) and human retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19; ATCC, Manassas, VA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and DMEM/F12 respectively, media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U/mL penicillin/100 μg/mL streptomycin. All cells were maintained in log rhythmic growth in T-75 flask ware incubated at 37 °C in a 95% air and 5% CO2 environment.
In vitro UVB irradiation
The RGC-5 and ARPE-19 cells were seeded in 24-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Grapevine, TX) at a density of 3 × 105 cells/well. Conditioned media from confluent cells was removed, and incubated with fresh media at 37 °C for 30 min before UV irradiation. The UV irradiation lamp (Hoefer Scientific, San Francisco, CA) has a mid-range wavelength of 302 nm with a filter size of 21 cm × 25 cm and exposure intensity of 7,000 μW/cm2. After incubation, culture medium was aspirated and replaced with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS; Gibco, Invitrogen) for UV exposure. During the irradiation, the cultures were exposed to UVB irradiation at 302 nm for 15, 30, and 45 min; unexposed cells served as controls. The cells were subsequently washed twice with HBSS and conditioned media was replaced. The experiment was concluded after 24 h incubation at which point cell morphology and viability were evaluated.
Cell morphology
After 24 h of recovery, morphological changes of post-UV radiated retinal ganglion and pigment epithelial cells were observed using bright field phase contrast microscopy (Olympus 1 × 51; Long Island, NY). In each condition, 100 cells were chosen randomly and morphological changes were noted and compared with unexposed cells.
Neutral red uptake assay
Following UVB exposure, cell viability was assayed using neutral red assay (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), where viable cells store the dye in intracellular lysosomes, via active transport.9 In brief, cells were incubated with the dye (final concentration 0.033%) for 2 h at room temperature and were subsequently washed with HBSS. Cells were allowed to air dry for 20 min and retained dye was eluted using ice-cold solubilization buffer (1% acetic acid/50% ethanol; 300 μl). Twenty minutes later, 100 μl aliquots were transferred to 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-One) for optical density readings at 490 nm.
Measurement of ROS
1 × 105 of RGC-5 and ARPE-19 were plated in 24-well plates. Cells were allowed to attach and subsequently exposed to UVB for 15 and 30 min; unexposed cells served as controls. ROS levels were evaluated as described previously10 using dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR 123; AnaSpec, Fremont, CA). In brief, conditioned media of each well was replaced with desired volume of 10 μM DHR 123 and the fluorescence was measured by spectrophotometer between the wavelength range of 485–528 nm.
RT-PCR
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was conducted to evaluate presence/absence of the apoptotic marker bax and the antiapoptotic marker bcl-2. cDNA was isolated from RGC-5 and ARPE-19 cells according to manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion, St. Austin, TX). Briefly, 100 μl of ice-cold cell lysis buffer was added to the isolated cells and incubated at 75 °C for 10 min. The genomic DNA was degraded with 2 μl of DNase I at 37 °C for 15 min, and deactivated by heating to 75 °C for 5 min. Reverse transcription was performed using 2 μM Oligo(dT)18 primers. The isolated cDNA was normalized with respect to the expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), a house keeping gene. From the isolated cDNA, apoptotic and antiapoptotic marker expression were observed using 5 pmole/μl of primer (bax F: 5′-GTTTCATCCAGGATC GAGCAG-3′, and R: 5′-TGCCTGCTTCCZGATG GTGA-3′; bcl-2 F: 5′-CCTGTGGATGACTGAGTACC-3′, and R: 5′-GAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATCA-3′) under the conditions of 95 °C/30 sec, 53 °C/40 sec,72 °C/40 sec for 30 cycles. The PCR products were separated on agarose gel electrophoresis in the presence of ethidium bromide and documented using gel documentation system (ChemiDoc; Bio Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The products of each reaction were confirmed against 1 kb DNA markers (Invitrogen).
Western blot analysis
The presence of the apoptotic marker cytochrome C was evaluated using western blot. RGC-5 and ARPE-19 cells were counted and processed for protein isolation according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion). In brief, protein was isolated by adding 300 μl of ice-cold cell disruption buffer. After obtaining a homogenous lysate, the samples were centrifuged and mixed in equal volume with 1 × SDS Tris-glycine buffer. The samples (approximately 2–5 × 104 cells) were resolved in a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 200 volts-hour (Vh). The protein profile was transblotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Sigma Aldrich) at 30 V kept overnight. Antibody detection was done with the use of WesternBreeze Chromogenic Immunodetection Kit (Invitrogen). After blocking with provided blocking solution, the membrane was incubated with primary antibody against human cytochrome C (Sigma Aldrich). The signal was revealed by incubation with secondary antibody solution and detected with chromogenic substrate (Sigma Aldrich).
Results
Structural morphology
A filamentous monolayer of RGC-5 cells revealed characteristic features after varying time points of UV exposure. They became cuboidal in shape and demonstrated blebs in 50% of the cells after 15 min of UV exposure. After 30 and 45 min of UV exposure, 60% and 70% of the cells were crenated, respectively. Membrane rupture was observed in 24% of the cells at 30 min exposure, which increased to 44% at 45 min (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Phase contrast micrographs show the presence of morphological changes such as bleb formation and membrane rupture observed in RGC-5 cells after various time points of UVB exposure.
In ARPE-19 cells, 22% developed blebs after 15 min of UV exposure. Other apoptotic features like large vacuoles were present in 12% of the cells after 30 min of UV exposure. With 45 min of exposure, 90% of the cells showed increase in size with irregular cell borders. Membrane rupture was observed in 33% after 30 min exposure which increased to 47% after 45 min of UV exposure (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Phase contrast micrographs shows the presence of morphological changes such as bleb formation, vacuolation, and membrane rupture observed in ARPE-19 cells after various time points of UVB exposure.
Neutral red uptake assay
We observed that there was a significant reduction in lysosomal membrane integrity in RGC-5 cells at 15 to 45 min of exposure to UVB (P < 0.00005). In comparison with control, only 45% of cells were viable after 15 min of exposure to UVB, which further decreased to 13% after 45 min of exposure. Similarly, in ARPE-19 cells, in comparison to control, 56% of cells were viable after 15 min of UV exposure which decreased to 13% after 45 min exposure (P < 0.0005) (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Viability of retinal ganglion and pigment epithelial cells after 15, 30, and 45 min exposure to UVB light.
Notes: *P < 0.00005, **P < 0.0005.
Intracellular ROS
RGC-5 exposed to UV showed 83% increase of ROS level after 15 min and 114% increase after 30 min of UV exposure compared to control (P < 0.00005; Figure 3). ARPE-19 cells showed 100% increase of ROS level after 15 min and 150% increase after 30 min of UV exposure compared to control (P < 0.00005; Figure 4).
Figure 4.
ROS levels assessed by DHR123 after exposure to different time points of UVB exposure.
Note: *P < 0.00005.
Abbreviation: ROS, reactive oxygen species.
RT-PCR
Apoptotic and antiapoptotic markers, Bax (486 bp) and Bcl-2 (128 bp) were confirmed against 1 kb ladder in 2% and 3% agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. No bands were detected using apoptotic bax primer in experimental cells up to 15 min after UV treatment. Cells harvested after 30 to 45 min exposure showed a significant increase of bax and a decrease or no band in bcl-2 relative to control. cDNA levels were normalized using house-keeping gene GAPDH (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Electrophoregram illustrating the presence of pro (Bax, 486 bp) and antiapoptotic marker (Bcl-2, 128 bp) expression in ARPE-19 and RGC-5 cells after 0, 15, 30, 45 min exposure to UV radiation.
Notes: A, RGC-5; B, ARPE-19; L, 100 bp ladder; Control, GAPDH (348 bp).
Western blot assay
No conjugate band identification was observed prior to the 15 min exposure to UVB. However, when the UV-B irradiation was carried out at 15 min, cytochrome-C positive bands was detected through the 45 min period.
Discussion
Oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species have been implicated in the pathogenesis of AMD.8,11 Chronic oxidative damage on the RPE cells as result of exposure to UV light results in its atrophy.8 Hypothetically, retinal ganglion cells provide an additional UV filter in addition to cornea and lens, before outer segments of photoreceptors and cells of the pigment epithelium are reached by the hazardous radiation.12 In our study, we demonstrate that UVB light exposure is cytotoxic to both the retinal ganglion cells and retinal pigment epithelial cells by a dose-dependent increase in ROS, indicating that the reduction in cell viability following UVB exposure involves oxidative stress.
The specific sensitivity of RPE to damage by the UV light is a result of its high metabolic rate and presence of intracellular photosensitizers.4 On the contrary, RGC are less active metabolically and are devoid of any kind of photosensitizing pigment. So hypothetically, RGC must be less sensitive to UV light damage as compared to the RPE. However, in our study, we found UVB light to be equally cytotoxic on both RGC and RPE cells. The expression of bax and the absence of bcl-2 following 30 and 45 min exposure support the role of UV-B in the induction of apoptosis. Similar observations have been recorded in transformed murine fibroblasts after exposure to UV light.13
Light exposure promotes lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes by triggering photo-oxidation reactions resulting in the formation of ROS.14 In our study, increased ROS production was noted in both the RGC and RPE cell lines after UV light suggesting an intermediary role for oxidative stress in the induction of apotosis. Similar results have been documented by Liang and colleagues who have shown ROS to be involved in the induction of apoptosis in RPE cells exposed to UV light.8
Mitochondria represent a primary site of phototoxicity induced by UV radiation, as described in studies of mitochondrial enzyme activity of murine fibroblast cells and human kertinocytes.15,16 A mitochondrial dependent pathway has also been implicated in the mechanism of induction of apoptosis in RPE cells.6 In addition, increased ROS production after UV radiation exposure correlates well with decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, a marker for mitochondrial function.17 In our study we demonstrated the release of cytochome C in UVB exposed cells suggesting the involvement of mitochondria.
In conclusion, the results of this study confirm altered cellular viability and mitochondrial function of both retinal ganglion cells and retinal pigment epithelial cells after exposure to UVB radiation in a dose-dependent manner with the cytotoxicity mediated through generation of ROS.
Footnotes
Disclosures
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.National Advisory Eye Council (US) Vision Research: A National Plan 1994–1998 NIH publication no. 93–3186. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1993 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tomany SC, Wang JJ, van Leeuwen R, et al. Risk factors for Incident age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(7):1280–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clemons TE, Milton RC, Klein R, et al. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group Risk factors for the incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) AREDS report number 19. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):533–539. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.10.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Loane E, Kelliher C, Beatly S, Nolan JM. The rationale and evidence for a protective role of macular pigment in age-related maculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1163–1168. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.135566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wood JPM, Lascaratos G, Bron AJ, Osborne NN. The influence of visible light exposure on cultured RGC-5 cells. Mol Vis. 2008;14:334–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roduit R, Schorderet DF. MAP kinase pathways in UV-induced apoptosis of retinal pigment epithelium ARPE19 cells. Apoptosis. 2008;13:343–353. doi: 10.1007/s10495-008-0179-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Simon HU, Haj-Yehia A, Levi-Schaffer F. Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction. Apoptosis. 2000;5(5):415–418. doi: 10.1023/a:1009616228304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liang FQ, Godley BF. Oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial DNA damage in human retinal pigment epithelial cells: a possible mechanism for RPE aging and age-related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76(4):397–403. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(03)00023-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Borenfreund E, Puerner JA. Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol Lett. 1985;24(2–3):119–124. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(85)90046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Katiyar SK, Afaq F, Azizuddin K, Mukhtar H. Inhibition of UVB induced oxidative stress-mediated phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in cultured human epidermal keratinocytes by green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;176:110–117. doi: 10.1006/taap.2001.9276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Beatty S, Koh H, Phil M, Henson D, Boulton M. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45(2):115–134. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00140-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sliney DH. How light reaches the eye and its components. Int J Toxicol. 2002;21(6):501–509. doi: 10.1080/10915810290169927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Naik E, Michalak EW, Villunger A, Adams JM, Strasser A. Ultraviolet radiation triggers apoptosis of fibroblasts and skin keratinocytes mainly via the BH3-only protein. J Cell Biol. 2007;176(4):415–424. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.De la Paz MA, Anderson RE. Lipid peroxidation in rod outer segments. Role of hydroxyl radical and lipid hydroperoxides. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2091–2096. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Masaki H, Sakurai H. Increased generation of hydrogen peroxide possibly from mitochondrial respiratory chain after UVB irradiation of murine fibroblasts. Dermatol Sci. 1997;14(3):207–216. doi: 10.1016/s0923-1811(96)00576-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Paz ML, González Maglio DH, Weill FS, Bustamante J, Leoni J. Mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular stress progression after ultraviolet B irradiation in human keratinocytes. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2008;24(3):115–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2008.00348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang CC, Fang KM, Yang CS, Tzeng SF. Reactive oxygen speciesinduced cell death of rat primary astrocytes through mitochondria-mediated mechanism. Cell Biochem. 2009;107(5):933–943. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





