Abstract
Low adherence to guidelines for weight-related behaviors (e.g., dietary intake and physical activity) among U.S. children underscores the need to better understand how parental factors may influence children’s obesity risk. In addition to most often acting as primary caregiver to their children, women are also known to experience greater levels of stress than men. This study systematically reviewed associations between maternal stress and children’s weight-related behaviors. Our search returned 14 eligible articles, representing 25 unique associations of maternal stress with a distinct child weight-related behavior (i.e., healthy diet (n=3), unhealthy diet (n=6), physical activity (n=7), sedentary behavior (n=9)). Overall, findings for the relationship between maternal stress and children’s weight-related behaviors were mixed, with no evidence for an association with children’s healthy or unhealthy dietary intake, but fairly consistent evidence for the association of maternal stress with children’s lower physical activity and higher sedentary behavior. Recommendations for future research include prioritizing prospective designs, identifying moderators, and use of high resolution, real-time data collection techniques to elucidate potential mechanisms.
Keywords: childhood obesity, weight-related behavior, maternal mental health
Introduction
Childhood obesity continues to be a pressing public health issue, (1) and behavioral health factors play important risk or protective roles. Only one third of U.S. children ages 2–19 meet the minimum daily recommendation for fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake, (2) while approximately 40% of total caloric intake for US children ages 2 to 18 is in the form of added sugars and solid fats. (3) Statistics for physical activity and sedentary behavior paint a similarly grim picture; despite the recommendation of the American Academy of Pediatrics that children ages two and older limit daily media use to two hours, the average US child and adolescent ages 2 to 18 watches three hours of television of day. (4) Further, even toddlers are engaging in high amounts of sedentary screen behavior, including the 48% of US toddlers ages 12 to 23 months who watch more than two hours of screen time per day. (5) Along with elevated engagement in sedentary activities, few youth meet national guidelines for physical activity; a recent analysis of the U.S. 2012 NHANES National Youth Fitness Survey found that 40% of children ages 6 to 11 and 72% of adolescents ages 12 to 15 did not meet physical activity guidelines. (6)
Given the significant control and influence that parents exert on their children’s lives, examination of the role that parents, specifically mothers, may play in children’s weight-related behaviors (7,8) merits continued examination. According to family systems theory, the behaviors of one individual cannot be fully explained in isolation from the larger family unit. (9) The relationship between mothers and their children is of particular relevance because mothers are most often the primary caregiver. (10) One way in which mothers may influence their children’s weight-related behaviors and obesity risk is through their experience of psychological stress. Psychological stress can be defined as a perceived imbalance between demands on an individual and the individual’s ability or resources to meet these demands. (11) Stress may arise from external events, or from an individual’s perception of their situation as stressful. (11) Previous studies have suggested that psychological stress in mothers may play a role in parenting style (12) and mother-child interactions, (13) and may also lead to elevated cortisol levels (a stress hormone) in their children. (14) The important role of maternal stress is even more relevant in light of estimates showing that women experience greater levels of chronic stress and daily stressors than men. (15,16) Further, elevated stress and the experience of stressful life events are an independent risk factors for the development of depression, (15) which is also more prevalent in women and which may further compound the negative effects of maternal stress on their children’s health and well-being. (17)
Maternal stress has been shown to influence various aspects of parenting practices and mother-child interactions, (18) and it is hypothesized that maternal mental health may influence children’s weight-related behaviors through three primary pathways. First, maternal stress may affect parenting behaviors, or mother-child interactions (e.g., through parenting or feeding style), which may in turn alter her child’s behavior. For example, mothers experiencing high levels of stress may spend less time with their children, (19) or may be less responsive and involved in interacting with their children than less stressed mothers. (20) Second, maternal stress may alter mothers’ own physical activity, sedentary behavior, and dietary intake, which in turn may alter her child’s behavior via altered maternal modeling. (21) Finally, elevated maternal stress may directly influence her child’s behavior via alterations in her child’s own stress response, (21) including a heightened biological (14) or psychological stress response in her child.
It is clear that maternal stress plays a role in the overall health and well-being of her child, and a recent meta-analysis (22) concluded that children of mothers experiencing high levels of psychological stress are also at greater risk of obesity. The authors note several potential mechanisms through which maternal stress may affect children’s body mass index (BMI), such as elevated stress in the child, and emphasize the need to better understand the behavioral pathways through which maternal stress may influence children’s obesity risk. (22) To our knowledge, no systematic review to date has investigated the role of maternal stress on the weight-related behaviors of their children. A recent review investigated a similar question, concerning the associations between maternal psychopathology (e.g., body dissatisfaction, anxiety, self-esteem and depression) and young children’s obesity risk and obesity ‘lifestyle risk factors’ (i.e. weight-related behaviors). (23) This study found a consistent positive association between one maternal mental health dimension - depressive symptoms – with obesity and obesity lifestyle risk factors in their children, but mixed findings for associations of other maternal psychopathology (i.e. body dissatisfaction) with children’s weight-related behaviors. (23) Because maternal stress represents a common psychological experience that is both related to depressive symptoms (24) and an independent risk factor for obesity outcomes in children, (22) the investigation of the unique contribution of maternal stress on children’s weight related behaviors represents a unique contribution to the literature on maternal mental health and children’s obesity risk.
Thus, the goal of this review was to (a) identify the instruments and methods most commonly used to measure maternal stress as well as child healthy and unhealthy dietary intake, physical activity, and sedentary behavior, (b) examine the associations between maternal stress and children’s weight-related behaviors across studies in the literature, and (c) identify whether maternal stress is differentially associated with children’s obesity-related behaviors (i.e., healthy and unhealthy dietary intake, physical activity, and sedentary behavior). We selected these four distinct weight-related behaviors as they represent unique risk (i.e., unhealthy dietary intake, sedentary behavior) and protective (i.e., healthy dietary intake, physical activity) factors that have been highlighted as playing a role in children’s obesity risk. (25–27)
Methods
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Studies that met the following criteria were included in the review: (a) available in English language, (b) included children between the ages of 0 and 18, (c) contained a self-report measure of maternal perceived stress or experience of stressors, (d) contained a measure of child dietary intake, child physical activity, or child sedentary behavior, and (e) in studies containing mothers and/or fathers, at least 70% of the sample were mothers. Search terms included a combination of two elements: (a) maternal stress, and (b) child weight-related behavior. The following keywords were used in order to identify relevant articles: (“maternal” OR “mother” OR “parental”) AND (“stress*” OR “stressors”) AND (“youth” OR “child”) AND (“weight-related” OR “obesogenic” OR “diet*” OR “food” OR “intake” OR “nutrition” OR “eat*” OR “activity” OR “physical” OR “sport*” OR “sedentary” OR “television”) NOT (“rat” OR “prenatal”).
Search Process
A review of the literature was performed using three databases (i.e., Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO) restricting the time frame of the search from the time of database inception until April 15, 2016. Three individuals conducted the original literature search, according to PRSIMA guidelines. ETS and SGO independently searched and screened for articles examining dietary outcomes, and JPM and SGO screened articles examining physical activity and sedentary behavior outcomes. Figure 1 displays the PRSIMA diagram for the literature search. After the removal of duplicates due to using multiple databases, the search produced 3,158 unique records. Based on title review, 2,100 records were removed, and the abstracts of the remaining 1,058 records were reviewed, from which 65 articles were downloaded and the full-text versions were reviewed for eligibility. Two independent readers reviewed each article and determined whether it met the inclusion criteria. Ultimately, 14 articles were included in the qualitative review. Primary reasons for exclusion included: study measured only maternal stress or child weight-related behavior(s), or measured both stress and weight-related behavior within the same individual (e.g., in either mother or child), or study measured child obesity outcomes (e.g., BMI) but not weight-related behaviors.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram, summarizing the search process to identify and screen articles examining the associations between maternal stress with children’s weight-related behaviors published through April 2016.
Study Quality Coding
After identifying all eligible articles (n=14), articles were coded for study characteristics. Study characteristics and key findings are summarized in Table 1. Study quality was assessed by two independent coders using a modified study quality rating tool, (28) which assessed risk of bias in (a) the selection of exposed and non-exposed cohorts (i.e., from the same underlying population), (b) the quality of exposure assessment (i.e., using a validated measure), (c) confidence that the outcome was not present at the start of the study, or that baseline levels of the outcome were controlled for in analyses, (d) the quality of outcome assessment (i.e., using a validated measure), and (e) adequate follow-up (for longitudinal) or adequate recruitment rate (for cross-sectional). Studies were also coded for whether or not analyses controlled for a number of potential confounders, including child factors (e.g., race, sex), maternal factors (e.g., marital status, health, BMI, education), and household factors (e.g., household income). Coders met to compare codes and any discrepancies were resolved and agreed upon. The choice to conduct a systematic narrative analysis of results, as opposed to a quantitative meta-analysis, was based on the great diversity of operational definitions used to describe the concepts of maternal stress and child weight-related behaviors across studies.
Table 1.
Associations of maternal stress with child weight-related behaviors.
| Authors | Study Design | Child Age | Race/Ethnicity | SES | Sample Size (N) | % Mother | Maternal Stress Measurement | Child Outcome Measurement | Association with Child Healthy Dietary Intake | Association with Child Unhealthy Dietary Intake |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studies examining the association of maternal stress with children’s healthy and unhealthy dietary intake | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Parks et al. (29) | Cross- sectional | 3–17 years | Parent: 58% Caucasian; Child: 56% Caucasian | Low income | 2,119 | 72% | Measure of perceived stress & number of stressors | Healthy and Unhealthy (Fruits and vegetables, fast food; parent-reported) | 0 | +/0 |
| McPhie et al. (30) | Longitudinal | T1- M: 2.8, SD: 0.7; T2- M: 3.91, SD: 0.73 | Unspecified: 74% Australian or New Zealand | Annual household income: 70% >$85,000 | 117 | 100% | Short Form of the Parenting Stress Index | Healthy and Unhealthy (Children’s Eating and Physical Activity Questionnaire; mother-reported) | −/0 | 0 |
| Nanjappa et al. (32) | Cross sectional | 3–4 years | Mother: 57% Caucasian | Low income | 698 | 100% | Family Assessment Device, measure of family functioning | Unhealthy (Sugary foods; food frequency questionnaire from National Diet and Nutrition Survey; mother-reported) | N/A | + |
| Suglia et al. (33) | Longitudinal | T1–12 mo, T2–36 mo, T3–60 mo | Child: 51% African-American | Low income | 129 | 100% | Measure of maternal stressors | Unhealthy (Juice/Sugar sweetened beverages; mother-reported) | N/A | + |
| Hurley et al. (34) | Cross- sectional | 0–12 months | Mother: 50% White | Low income | 689 | 100% | Perceived Stress Scale | Unhealthy (Age-inappropriate foods and early cereal to bottle; 24-hour dietary recall; mother-reported) | N/A | 0/+ |
| Reiner et al. (31) | Cross-sectional | M: 14 years | Not provided; German | N/A | 214 | 100% | Trierer Inventory for Chronic Stress | Healthy and Unhealthy (Core foods, non-core foods, Food Frequency Questionnaire; child-reported) | −/0 | 0/+ |
|
| ||||||||||
| Association with Child Physical Activity | Association with Child Sedentary Behavior | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Studies examining the association of maternal stress with children’s physical activity and sedentary behavior | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Gray et al. (35) | Cross-sectional | M: 12.8, SD: 1.8 | Child: 52% Caucasian | Median household income: $20,000–$39,999 | 95 | 82% | Global Severity Index | Physical Activity (Relative to peers; parent-reported) | − | N/A |
| Parks et al. (29) | Cross-sectional | 3–17 years | Parent: 58% Caucasian; Child: 56% Caucasian | Low income | 2,119 | 72% | Measure of perceived stress & number of stressors | Physical Activity (Days/week; parent-reported) | 0/− | N/A |
| McConley et al. (36) | Cross-sectional | M: 11.1, SD: 0.57 | Child: 43% Hispanic | Median household income: $30,000–34,999 | 4,601 | 89% | Brief Symptom Inventory | Physical Activity (School Physical Activity and Nutrition Questionnaire; parent-reported); Sedentary behavior (Minutes/day; parent-reported) | − | + |
| Lundahl et al. (37) | Cross-sectional | 8–11 years | Child: 52.4% Caucasian | Low income | 122 | 88% | Measure of Perceived financial strain | Physical Activity (FELS Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children; child-reported); Sedentary Behavior (Modifiable Activity Questionnaire; child-reported) | + | + |
| Walton et al. (38) | Cross-sectional | 2–5 years | Parent: 55% Hispanic | Annual household income: 64% <$45,000 | 110 | 93% | Parenting Stress Index | Physical Activity (Minutes/day; parent-reported); Sedentary behavior (TV viewing/day; parent-reported) | − | 0 |
| Loprinzi (39) | Cross-sectional | 6–17 years | Child: 88.5% Hispanic | N/A | 101,672 | 79% | Measure of family functioning | Physical Activity (Days/week; parent-reported); Sedentary Behavior (Screen time/day; parent-reported) | − | + |
| Reiner et al. (31) | Cross-sectional | M: 14 years | Not provided; German | N/A | 214 | 100% | Trierer Inventory for Chronic Stress | Physical Activity (Days/week, minutes/day; child-reported); Sedentary Behavior (Minutes/day; child-reported) | − | + |
| Thompson & Christakis (43) | Cross-sectional | 4–35 months | Mother: 63% Caucasian | Median household income: $45,001–$60,000 | 1,793 | 100% | Mental Health Inventory-5 | Sedentary Behavior (Minutes/day; mother-reported) | N/A | + |
| Suglia et al. (33) | Longitudinal | T1–12 mo, T2–36 mo, T3–60 mo | Child: 51% African American | Low income | 129 | 100% | Measure of maternal stress | Sedentary Behavior (TV viewing/day; mother-reported) | N/A | 0/+ |
| Li, Jurkowski, & Davidson (41) | Cross- sectional | M: 3 years | Mothers: 72% Caucasian | Low income | 1,589 | 100% | Perceived Stress Scale | Sedentary Behavior (TV viewing/day; mother-reported) | N/A | + |
| Pempek & McDaniel (42) | Cross- sectional | 12–48 months | Mothers: 85.5% Caucasian | Mean household income: $64,039 | 358 | 100% | Relational well-being score, representing relationship conflict | Sedentary Behavior (Tablet use/day; mother-reported) | N/A | 0/+ |
‘+’ indicates a positive association, ‘−’ indicates a negative (inverse) association, and ‘0’ indicates a null association between a specific maternal mental health variable and child weight-related behavior type; ‘N/A’ indicates that the given association was not examined within a study. R = Range; T1 = Time One (baseline) measurement, M = Mean; SD = Standard Deviation; T2 = Time Two (follow-up); T3 = Time Three (follow-up).
Results
Study Characteristics
In total, our search returned 14 unique articles investigating the associations of maternal stress with children’s weight-related behaviors, representing 25 unique associations. Of these, three measures of association described the association between maternal stress and children’s healthy dietary intake, (29–31) six for maternal stress and children’s unhealthy dietary intake, (29–34) seven for maternal stress and children’s physical activity, (29,31,35–39) and nine for the association between maternal stress and children’s sedentary behavior. (31,33,36–42)
Study Quality Ratings and Covariates
Based on the study criteria described in the Study Quality Coding section above, average study quality rating (28) was 0.81 (range: 0–1, with ‘1’ representing the best possible), and study ratings were similar across dietary only (0.83) and activity only (0.81) studies. The majority of studies adjusted for at least some covariates. Across studies examining dietary outcomes, the most commonly adjusted for covariates included children’s sex (67%), household income (67%), race of either the mother or child (67%), and mother’s marital status (50%). Across studies examining physical activity or sedentary behavior outcomes, far fewer studies controlled for covariates overall, and the covariates most commonly adjusted for include maternal education (63%), child gender (55%), and race of either the mother or child (36%).
Demographic Characteristics of Included Samples
Approximately half of included studies (n=6, 43%) focused either specifically or exclusively on low-income populations within the United States. (29,33,34,37,41,43) The majority of other studies sampled a representative US population. Three (21%) studies were conducted outside of the US, in Australia, (30) Germany, (31) and the UK (32). Although the majority of studies contained predominantly Caucasian participants, there were some studies with a majority of Hispanic (39,44) or African American (33) participants.
Maternal Stress Measures
Measures of maternal stress varied widely across studies. Several studies used the concept of family or parenting stress, including the McMaster Family Assessment Device-General Functioning Scale, (32) the Short Form of the Parenting Stress Index (30,38), and a general family functioning index. (39) Two studies used the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), a general measure of perceived stress. (34,41) Other studies used various scales, including the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) to assess symptomatic distress, (35) the Mental Health Inventory-5, (40) and a ‘Personal well-being’ and ‘Relational well-being’ measure constructed to represent role overload and stress due to relationships and conflict. (42) Several studies measured parental report of stressors experienced in specific domains. These included one study that used a Stressor Index (0–7 scale), measuring four domains of stress: physical health, mental health, financial strain, and family structure, in conjunction with a single-item past-year PSS; (29) one study using a measure of perceived financial strain; (37) one using the Trierer Inventory for Chronic Stress to assess sources of past-three-month stress; (31) and one study which used a Cumulative Social Risk Score, summing maternal reports of six domain-specific stressors. (33) Overall, the variety of scales employed to measure maternal stress across studies illustrates the wide range of definitions and criteria used to operationalize stress.
Child Weight-Related Behavior Measures
Child Healthy and Unhealthy Dietary Intake
Child dietary intake was measured through a variety of instruments, most commonly through food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) (31,32) or the Children’s Eating and Physical Activity Questionnaire (30). In general, mothers recalled information on children’s usual dietary intake over a specified period of time. Other studies used targeted questionnaires to assess children’s intake of specific food items, including F&V or fast food (29), or sugar sweetened beverages (SSB) (33). One study in infants used interviewer-assessed 24-hour dietary recalls. (34) The types of foods that constituted ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ varied and were defined within each study. In general, studies defined ‘healthy’ dietary intake as including intake of F&V or ‘core’ nutritious foods, and age-appropriate intake (e.g., breast milk) for infants. ‘Unhealthy’ dietary intake was commonly defined as intake of fast food, SSB, or foods high in added sugars (i.e., ‘non-core’ foods), or in infants, age-inappropriate intake (i.e., introduction of solid foods earlier than recommended).
Child Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior
Overall, the majority of studies assessing physical activity asked mothers to recall children’s habitual activity levels. One study asked mothers to rate their child’s physical activity as compared to peers, (35) while others asked mothers to provide the number of minutes per day (31,38) or per week (29,39) that their child engages in physical activity. A small number of studies used validated questionnaires to assess children’s physical activity, including the School Physical Activity and Nutrition (SPAN) (36), the Fels Physical Activity Questionnaire (Fels PAQ), (37) both of which were child-reported. The majority of studies assessing the influence of maternal stress on children’s sedentary behavior used a single mother-reported item of children’s screen time, assessing the number of hours per day the child spends watching TV (33,38,39,41) or using tablets (42). Other studies asked mothers to report on the number of minutes their child spends engaged in sedentary behavior overall (31,40), while one study used the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire to assess sedentary behavior through child self-report. (37)
Associations between Maternal Stress and Child Weight-Related Behaviors
There were 25 unique associations of the relationship between maternal stress and a specific child weight-related behavior outcome, as summarized in Table 1.
Healthy Dietary Intake
There is little evidence to support an association between maternal stress and children’s healthy dietary intake, with the three studies measuring maternal stress and child healthy dietary intake finding mixed (30,31) and null (29) associations. Studies with mixed findings found differing effects either by maternal stress type, or by child healthy food definition. In a longitudinal study of preschool aged children, there was a negative association between maternal parenting stress at baseline (child mean age= 2.8 yrs., SD = 0.68) and mother-reported children’s intake of vegetables, but no association with children’s intake of fruit one year later (child mean age = 3.9 yrs., SD = 0.73). (30) Reiner et al. (31) used the Trierer Inventory of Chronic Stress to examine the association of maternal stress overall, as well as stress in the specific domains of work overload, social overload, and social tension, with children’s intake of core foods – a sum of intake of six healthy foods assessed in the frequency questionnaire. Maternal overall stress was significantly associated with decreased intake frequency of core foods (β = −0.135, p <0.05); however, maternal stress in each of the three specific sub-domains of stress was not associated with children’s core food consumption. (31) In a large (n=2,119) cross-sectional study of children ages 3 to 17, there was no association between either maternal perceived stress or number of stressors experienced over the past year and children’s current intake of F&V. (29)
Unhealthy Dietary Intake
Of the six studies (four cross-sectional, two longitudinal) examining the association between maternal stress and child unhealthy dietary intake, two studies (32,33) found a positive association, three studies (29,31,34) found mixed associations, and one (30) found a null association. Of the two studies finding a positive association between maternal stress and child unhealthy intake, one longitudinal (33) and one cross-sectional (32), both found maternal stress to be associated with greater mother-reported child intake of foods high in added sugars, including juice, SSBs, and sugary foods. Three cross-sectional studies (29,31,34) found mixed positive and null associations between maternal stress and child unhealthy intake, across a variety of child ages. In a study of over 2,000 children ages 3 to 17, Parks et al. (29) examined the association of both maternal perceived stress and number of stressors experienced, finding that greater perceived stress was associated with increased odds of children eating fast food at least two times per week in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.10, p <.001), but that the number of stressors experienced, though significantly associated with fast food intake in unadjusted analyses, became non-significant (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93, 1.08) in adjusted analyses. This suggests potential divergent effects of perceived stress ratings and objective stressor experience on children’s unhealthy intake. Similarly, the study by Reiner et al. (31) found that while maternal overall perceived stress was marginally associated with increased consumption of non-core foods (a sum of four unhealthy foods) in their children (β= 0.131, p<0.10), increased ‘social overload’ stress in mothers was significantly associated with increased non-core food consumption in their children (β=0.30, p<0.05). (31) Hurley et al. (34) also found conflicting results depending on the type of unhealthy dietary intake. Although maternal perceived stress was also positively associated with concurrently reported early addition of cereal to 4- to 6-month-old infants’ bottles (before the recommended age), maternal stress was not associated with 7- to 12-month-old children’s unhealthy dietary intake, defined as consumption of age-inappropriate foods (e.g., snacks, desserts) and measured by maternal-reported 24-hour dietary recall. One study by McPhie et al. (30) found null results between maternal parenting stress measured at baseline and children’s unhealthy (i.e. snacks, sweets, pastries) dietary intake one year later. Overall, there appears to be no clear pattern of findings for the association between maternal stress and children’s unhealthy dietary intake across study design, child age range, or type of unhealthy foods measured.
Physical Activity
There appears to be a consistent negative association between maternal stress and children’s physical activity; among the seven cross-sectional studies investigating this association, five (31,35,36,38,39) found a negative association, one (29) indicated mixed results, and one (37) found a positive association between maternal stress and child physical activity. The most consistent finding of a negative association between maternal stress and child physical activity spanned a variety of measures of maternal stress (e.g., perceived stress, family stress, chronic stress inventory) as well as a variety of conceptualizations of child physical activity (e.g., SPAN Questionnaire, physical activity minutes per day, physical activity of child as compared to peers). Overall, studies finding a negative association relied on maternal report of children’s usual physical activity levels, with only one study using a child-report measure, (31) and no studies using an objective measure of physical activity (e.g., accelerometry). The mixed findings by Parks et al. (29) indicated that neither perceived stress nor number of stressors was associated with parent-reported days per week of child moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA); however, a particular stressor (i.e., financial) was negatively associated with days per week of child MVPA. Conversely, Lundahl et al. (37) documented a positive association between financial strain and child-reported physical activity, as reported through the Fels PAQ, suggesting that higher levels of financial strain were associated with greater volume of physical activity in children. The conflicting results for the association between mother-reported financial stress and children’s physical activity between these studies might be viewed in light of sample size, as the study by Parks et al. (29) finding a negative association included over 2,000 children, while Lundahl et al. (37) found a positive association in just over 100 children.
Sedentary Behavior
Studies exploring the association between maternal stress and children’s sedentary behavior either conceptualized sedentary behavior as mother-reported sedentary screen time (33,38,39,41,42) or as mother- (36,40) or child- (31,37) reported sedentary minutes. Of the nine studies (one longitudinal, eight cross sectional) investigating this association, six (31,36,37,39–41) indicated a positive association, two (33,42) indicated mixed findings, and one (38) indicated a null association. Of the six studies indicating a positive association between maternal stress and sedentary behavior, two (37,39) found that higher levels of maternal stress were associated with higher levels of child- and parent-reported screen time per day among children, respectively. Furthermore, Thompson & Christakis (40) and Reiner et al. (31) concluded that higher levels of maternal stress were associated with higher levels of child- and parent-reported total sedentary time per day among children, respectively. In the only longitudinal study assessing associations between maternal stress and sedentary behavior, Suglia et al. (33) found that reporting two or more maternal stressors at child age 12 months and 36 months, compared to no maternal stressors, was significantly associated with watching television for more than two hours a day (72% vs. 55%) among boys at five years; however, this association was not found among girls. The only study to conclude a null association between maternal stress and sedentary time, Walton et al. (38) found that the odds of watching two or more hours of TV per day did not differ depending on level of mother-reported parenting stress for either weekdays or weekend days; however, confidence intervals were large, indicating possible variability in the association among participants (weekday OR = 0.95 [CI 0.33–2.31]; weekend day OR =1.93 [CI 0.66–5.66]). Among these studies, there appears to be a trend by age, where the studies with mixed or null findings had the youngest child age, ranging from 1–5 years of age, (33,38,42); this may indicate a stronger effect of maternal stress on the sedentary behavior of older children. Overall, the results from these cross-sectional studies indicate a positive association between maternal stress and child sedentary behavior.
Discussion
Summary
Overall, findings for the relationship between maternal stress and children’s weight-related behaviors were mixed, with no evidence for an association with children’s dietary intake, but fairly consistent evidence for the association of maternal stress with lower physical activity and higher sedentary behavior in children. The associations of maternal stress and children’s healthy diet are equivocal; of three studies exploring the relationship between maternal stress and children’s healthy (i.e., F&V) intake, one found null and two found mixed associations, suggesting that, if the two are related, important moderators may be overlooked and are potential avenues for future studies. The findings for maternal stress and children’s unhealthy dietary intake were also mixed, and studies finding a positive association between maternal stress and child unhealthy intake generally operationalized unhealthy intake as foods and drinks high in added sugars, such as juice, and candies; studies finding mixed or null results generally operationalized unhealthy foods as including fast food or age-inappropriate foods (for infants). This suggests that the effects of maternal mental health on children’s unhealthy dietary intake may differ by food type.
Maternal stress and children’s physical activity were largely found to be associated, with the majority of studies across a variety of ages supporting the notion that maternal perceived stress is inversely related to children’s daily minutes of physical activity. One study noted a positive association between maternal (financial) stress and children’s physical activity, where increased financial strain was associated with more physical activity in children; this is unexpected, and the authors postulate that parents with heightened financial difficulties may work late and place their children in afterschool programs were physical activity is promoted, or may encourage their children to play outside independently more than parents with less financial strain. (37) Similarly, across the vast majority of studies included, maternal stress was positively associated with children’s sedentary behavior, most often conceptualized as time spent watching television per day.
Although stress may represent one generalizable phenomenon, there are many sub-classifications of stress, including general perceived stress, perceived stress limited to a specific domain (e.g., financial, health, or social), or the experience of specific stressful life events (e.g., death, divorce). It is possible that a mother’s experience of each of these different types of stress may differentially relate to their children’s weight-related behaviors. Although different types of stress may have similar characteristics, there may be distinct pathways through which each stress type operates. For example, one study measured both overall maternal chronic stress as well as stress in three specific domains (e.g., work overload, social overload, and social tension), and found overall maternal stress to be associated with children’s decreased healthy ‘core’ foods, but only social tension to be associated with children’s increased intake of unhealthy ‘non-core’ foods. (31) Similarly, another study found that only maternal financial stress, not perceived stress or number of stressors experienced, was negatively associated with their children’s lower physical activity levels. (29) These discrepant findings suggest that there may be unique processes linking specific domains of maternal stress with children’s weight-related behaviors.
Interestingly, of the two studies that measured the associations of parenting stress with children’s weight-related behaviors, (30,38) results for an association with obesogenic behaviors were largely null. For example, one study found no association of maternal parenting stress with intake of unhealthy foods, (30) while the second study found no association between parenting stress and children’s TV viewing. (38) One potential interpretation may be that mothers are stressed partly because of their parenting duties, such as limiting junk food intake or time spent watching television, which could deplete cognitive and emotional resources.
Strengths of the Literature
The studies reviewed were highly representative of low income or at-risk populations and included a variety of racial and ethnic groups. Additionally, there were a range of study designs and child ages represented, from infancy through 17 years of age, and studies addressed both dietary intake and physical activity outcomes.
Limitations of the Literature and Future Directions
A major limitation of the included studies is the wide variety of child activity outcome measurements. For example, among studies measuring the effect of maternal stress on children’s unhealthy dietary intake, the definitions of ‘unhealthy’ dietary intake included a variety of food types and classifications of quantity or frequency of consumption, from whether a child typically consumes fast food two or more times per week, (29) to whether a child drinks three or more servings of SSBs per day (33). Similarly, for studies measuring physical activity outcomes, definitions and measurements of physical activity ranged greatly, from maternal report of the number of days in the previous week in which her child was physically active for at least 20 minutes, (39) to the FELS PAQ score, based on child report of various questions relating to physical activity over the past year, (37) to a mother’s rating on a single item of how physically active her child is as compared to other children. (35) The disparate methods of defining and quantifying child weight-related behaviors complicate the standardization and comparison of findings across studies. Future studies should consider using more standardized methods of collection and quantifying activity outcomes, such as the use of accelerometers to capture physical activity and standardized algorithms to classify time spent in MVPA.
An additional limitation of the included studies is the dearth of longitudinal designs. For example, our search found no longitudinal studies examining the associations between maternal stress and child physical activity. The cross-sectional design of most studies poses two concerns. First, there is a potential for bidirectional effects, as certain health behaviors could lead to an increased risk of stress (e.g., low intake of F&V, sedentary lifestyle, diet high in fat and sugar). One study found that consuming a ‘Western’ diet, high in fat and sugar was associated with elevated risk of anxiety and depression in large sample of women. (45) Thus, it may not be that mothers experiencing high levels of stress have increased palatability for unhealthy foods and fewer cognitive and emotional resources to prepare healthy foods for their children, but conversely that mothers of children with the highest intake of unhealthy foods also consume these foods themselves, and are thus at elevated risk of experiencing high levels of psychological stress. Second, health behaviors in mothers are correlated with health behaviors of their children, (7) yet maternal health behavior was not controlled for in any included study. Thus, the mechanisms through which mothers influence their children’s weight-related behaviors may be varied and complex, and cannot be fully addressed through cross-sectional designs. As such, longitudinal studies can provide better insight as to the stability of the association of maternal stress on children’s weight-related behaviors, as well as reveal any critical time windows in the developmental process. Additionally, experimental studies, such as interventions designed to reduce maternal stress and measure changes in children’s weight-related behaviors, are important for a better understanding of causality.
Although a few studies of older children (six years of age and up) used child-reported physical activity and sedentary behavior information, (31,37) or dietary intake information, (31) the majority of studies used maternal-report of children’s weight-related behaviors. While this may be necessary for very young children, reliance on maternal report may also introduce potential bias. Mothers may simply not be aware of all of their child’s activity or food consumption, such as the types of snacks her child eats during school time. Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated that mothers experiencing mental health issues (e.g., depression) may misperceive or misreport on their children’s behaviors, resulting in biased reports; (46) this may also be the case in parents with elevated stress levels, who may report in inaccurate reporting of child behaviors.
Another major limitation of the field is a lack of real-time self-report data capture such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to assess maternal stress and/or child weight-related behaviors as they occur naturally within the context of everyday life. The majority of studies ask participants to recall ‘usual’ or habitual behavior over a period of time in the recent past (i.e., the past week or month). For example, nearly all of the included studies examining children’s sedentary behavior used a single item (i.e., parent-reported number of TV viewing minutes per day); this is problematic, as this estimation of usual levels may evoke recall bias, and more importantly because sedentary behavior may include more than simply time spend in sedentary screen activities. One notable exception to the use of recall to assess ‘usual’ levels of weight-related behaviors includes the use of 24-hr recall to ask mothers to report on their child’s complete previous-day dietary intake (34). Although even the 24-hour recall method does not capture events in real-time as they occur, it might pose an advantage over studies relying more heavily on recall. Other methods, such as EMA can provide a notable advantage over commonly used retrospective methods, as it allows for more ecologically valid data capture that is less prone to biases triggered by recall or laboratory settings. For example, a study design in which mothers and children report on their on social context, affective and stress states, and weight-related behaviors through EMA can allow for more precise examination of the roles that maternal stress may play in children’s weight-related behaviors on an acute and chronic basis. (47)
In addition to utilizing EMA methods, future studies should strive to incorporate more objective monitor-based measures of children’s physical activity and sedentary behavior, such as accelerometers, pedometers, or ActivPAL™ thigh-worn monitors (PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow, UK), which allow for more precise classification of the sitting, standing, and walking events. Similarly, use of higher resolution methods, such as multiple-pass 24-hour dietary recall paired with the calculation of a more comprehensive measure of dietary quality, such as the Health Eating Index (HEI), a scoring method based on the U.S. Dietary Guidelines that can be used to determine an individual’s overall dietary quality, (48) can provide a more nuanced description of an individual’s weight-related behaviors. The combination of EMA-reported contextual information along with objective measures of children’s activity could provide more useful opportunities for understanding the effects of maternal stress on child weight-related behavior. For example, in an event-contingent EMA prompting schedule a certain threshold of sedentary behavior as measured by accelerometer (e.g. 30 minutes of sedentary activity), could prompt an EMA survey designed to gain more information about the context and antecedents of this activity.
In addition to the need for more comprehensive and fine-grained data, several studies point to the need to examine maternal and child factors that may moderate the association between maternal stress and children’s weight-related outcomes. For example, the study by Suglia et al. (33) found maternal experience of greater than 2 cumulative social risk factors (e.g., housing insecurity, paternal incarceration), to be longitudinally associated with elevated soda and juice consumption in both boys and girls, but with watching greater than 2 hours per day of television in boys only. This suggests that maternal stress may differentially affect children based on sex, potentially reflecting gender-specific differences in the social acceptability of strategies that mother may use to cope with stressors (e.g., mothers may use television as a tool to occupy boys in times of stress but use different strategies for girls). (33) Although generally used only as covariates in the included studies, other child factors (e.g., race, ethnicity) and other parental factors, such as socio-economic status, marital status, or household structure may also play an important moderating role; future studies should consider formally analyzing these demographic characteristics where appropriate.
Conclusion
Overall, the present review found mixed evidence for an association between maternal stress and children’s weight related behaviors; higher maternal stress tended to be consistently linked with lower child physical activity and higher sedentary behavior, but not consistently associated with dietary intake of healthy or unhealthy foods. Future research should examine the connection between maternal stress and children’s weight-related behaviors with careful consideration of potential moderators, and prioritizing longitudinal study design along with high resolution, real-time data collection techniques. Given the current state of the evidence for an association between maternal stress and children’s weight-related behaviors (e.g., physical activity and sedentary behavior), clinicians may consider behavioral interventions, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction, to diminish the effects of stress in mothers on children’s weight related behaviors as an additional strategy to address childhood obesity prevention and intervention.
Acknowledgments
Funding Source: This study was funded by the University of Southern California Graduate School Provost Fellowship (attributed to the first author), the National Institutes of Health Cancer Control and Epidemiology Research Training Grant (T32CA009492), and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL119255, attributed to the last author).
Abbreviations
- BMI
body mass index
- F&V
fruit and vegetable
- NHANES
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
- PSS
Perceived Stress Scale
- BSI
Brief Symptom Inventory
- FFQ
Food Frequency Questionnaire
- SSB
Sugar Sweetened Beverages
- SPAN
School Physical Activity and Nutrition
- Fels PAQ
Fels Physical Activity Questionnaire
- MVPA
Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity
Footnotes
Potential conflicts of interest: None
Conflicts of Interest Statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
- 1.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):483–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mun KA, Krebs-smith SM. Food Intakes of US Children and Adolescents Compared With Recommendations. Pediatrics. 1997;100(3):232–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.3.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. J Am Diet Assoc. 10. Vol. 110. Elsevier Inc; 2010. Dietary Sources of Energy, Solid Fats, and Added Sugars among Children and Adolescents in the United States; pp. 1477–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Children, Adolescents, and Television. 2004 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Certain LK, Kahn RS. Prevalence, Correlates, and Trajectory of Television Viewing Among Infants and Toddlers. Pediatrics. 2002;109(4):634–42. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.4.634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bai Y, Chen S, Laurson KR, Kim Y, Saint-Maurice PF, Welk GJ. The associations of youth physical activity and screen time with fatness and fitness: The 2012 NHANES national youth fitness survey. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cameron AJ, Crawford DA, Salmon J, Campbell K, McNaughton SA, Mishra GD, et al. Clustering of Obesity-Related Risk Behaviors in Children and Their Mothers. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21(2):95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pearson N, Biddle SJH. Am J Prev Med. 2. Vol. 41. Elsevier Inc; 2011. Aug, Sedentary behavior and dietary intake in children, adolescents, and adults. A systematic review; pp. 178–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bowen M. The use of family theory in clinical practice. Compr Psychiatry. 1966;7(5):345–74. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(66)80065-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bianchi SM. Maternal employment and time with children: dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography. 2000;37(4):401–14. doi: 10.1353/dem.2000.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Pub. Co; 1984. p. xiii.p. 445. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Park H, Walton-Moss B. Parenting Style, Parenting Stress, and Children’s Health-Related Behaviors. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012;33(6):495–503. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318258bdb8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Farmer AY, Lee SK. The Effects of Parenting Stress, Perceived Mastery, and Maternal Depression on Parent–Child Interaction. J Soc Serv Res. 2011;37(5):516–25. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Essex MJ, Klein MH, Cho E, Kalin NH. Maternal Stress Beginning in Infancy May Sensitize Children to Later Stress Exposure: Effects on Cortisol and Behavior*. 2002;3223(2) doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01553-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D. Who’s Stressed? Distributions of Psychological Stress in the United States in Probability Samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2012;42(6):1320–34. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Matud MP. Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Pers Individ Dif. 2004;37(7):1401–15. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ertel KA, Rich-Edwards JW, Koenen KC. Maternal depression in the United States: nationally representative rates and risks. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;20(11):1609–17. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Morrissey TW, Dagher RK. A longitudinal analysis of maternal depressive symptoms and children’s food consumption and weight outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Dec;17(12):2759–68. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013003376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gundersen C, Mahatmya D, Garasky S, Lohman B. Linking psychosocial stressors and childhood obesity. Obes Rev. 2011;12(501):54–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clowtis LM, Kang D-H, Padhye NS, Rozmus C, Barratt MS. Biobehavioral Factors in Child Health Outcomes. Nurs Res. 2016;65(5):340–51. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gelfand DM, Teti DM. The effects of maternal depression on children. Clin Psychol Rev. 1990;10(3):329–53. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tate EB, Wood W, Liao Y, Dunton GF. Do stressed mothers have heavier children? A meta-analysis on the relationship between maternal stress and child body mass index. Obes Rev. 2015;16(5):351–61. doi: 10.1111/obr.12262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Benton PM, Skouteris H, Hayden M. Does maternal psychopathology increase the risk of pre-schooler obesity? A systematic review. Appetite Elsevier Ltd. 2015;87:259–82. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thomason E, Volling BL, Flynn Ha, McDonough SC, Marcus SM, Lopez JF, et al. Infant Behav Dev. 3. Vol. 37. Elsevier Inc; 2014. Parenting stress and depressive symptoms in postpartum mothers: Bidirectional or unidirectional effects? pp. 406–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Newby PK. Are dietary intakes and eating behaviors related to childhood obesity? A comprehensive review of the evidence. J Law Med Ethics. 2007;35(1):35–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Iannotti RJ, Wang J. Patterns of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Diet in U.S. Adolescents. J Adolesc Health Elsevier Ltd. 2013;53(2):280–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boone-Heinonen J, Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS. Obesogenic clusters: multidimensional adolescent obesity-related behaviors in the U.S. Ann Behav Med. 2008;36(3):217–30. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9074-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.de Moraes VYVY, Godin K, Dos Santos JBGJBG, Faloppa FF, Bhandari M, Belloti JCJC. Influence of compensation status on time off work after carpal tunnel release and rotator cuff surgery: a meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parks EP, Kumanyika S, Moore RH, Stettler N, Wrotniak BH, Kazak A. Influence of stress in parents on child obesity and related behaviors. Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1096–104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.McPhie S, Skouteris H, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, McCabe M, Ricciardelli La, Milgrom J, et al. Maternal predictors of preschool child-eating behaviours, food intake and body mass index: a prospective study. Early Child Dev Care. 2012;182(8):999–1014. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reiner M, Niermann C, Krapf F, Woll A. Stress: personal matter or family affair? Intra- and inter-individual relationships between stress, physical activity, sedentary behavior, and nutrition. Int J child, youth Fam Stud. 2015;6(1):68–92. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nanjappa S, Hector M, Marcenes W. Mother’s perception of general family functioning and sugar consumption of 3- and 4-year-old children: The east london family study. Caries Res. 2015;49(5):515–22. doi: 10.1159/000431234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Suglia SF, Duarte CS, Chambers EC, Boynton-Jarrett R. Social and behavioral risk factors for obesity in early childhood. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013;34(8):549–56. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3182a509c0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hurley KM, Black MM, Merry BC, Caulfield LE. Maternal mental health and infant dietary patterns in a statewide sample of Maryland WIC participants. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11(2):229–39. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gray WN, Janicke DM, Ingerski LM, Silverstein JH. The impact of peer victimization, parent distress and child depression on barrier formation and physical activity in overweight youth. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008;29(October 2015):26–33. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31815dda74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.McConley RL, Mrug S, Gilliland MJ, Lowry R, Elliott MN, Schuster Ma, et al. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2. Vol. 19. Nature Publishing Group; 2011. Feb, Mediators of maternal depression and family structure on child BMI: parenting quality and risk factors for child overweight; pp. 345–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lundahl A, Nelson TD, Van Dyk TR, West T. Psychosocial Stressors and Health Behaviors: Examining Sleep, Sedentary Behaviors, and Physical Activity in a Low-Income Pediatric Sample. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2013;52(8):721–9. doi: 10.1177/0009922813482179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Walton K, Simpson JR, Darlington G, Haines J. Parenting stress: a cross-sectional analysis of associations with childhood obesity, physical activity, and TV viewing. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14(1):244. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Loprinzi PD. Association of Family Functioning on Youth Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(5):642–8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thompson D, Christakis D. The association of maternal mental distress with television viewing in children under 3 years old. Ambul Pediatr. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li K, Jurkowski JM, Davison KK. Social support may buffer the effect of intrafamilial stressors on preschool children’s television viewing time in low-income families. Child Obes. 2013;9(6):484–91. doi: 10.1089/chi.2013.0071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pempek TA, Mcdaniel BT. Soc Res Child Dev. Springer US; 2016. Young Children ‘ s Tablet Use and Associations with Maternal Well - Being; p. 705. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thompson AL, Bentley ME. The critical period of infant feeding for the development of early disparities in obesity. Soc Sci Med Elsevier Ltd. 2013;97:288–96. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gross RS, Velazco NK, Briggs RD, Racine AD. Maternal depressive symptoms and child obesity in low-income urban families. Acad Pediatr Elsevier Ltd. 2013;13(4):356–63. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pasco JA, Ph D, Williams LJ, Ph D, Hodge AM, Ph D, et al. Association of Western and Traditional Diets With Depression and Anxiety in Women. 2010;(March):305–11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09060881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boyle MH, Pickles AR. Influence of Maternal Depressive Symptoms on Ratings of Childhood Behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997;25(5):399–412. doi: 10.1023/a:1025737124888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dunton GF, Liao Y, Dzubur E, Leventhal AM, Huh J, Gruenewald T, et al. Contemp Clin Trials. Vol. 43. Elsevier B.V; 2015. Investigating Within-day and Longitudinal Effects of Maternal Stress on Children’s Physical Activity, Dietary Intake, and Body Composition: Protocol for the MATCH Study; pp. 142–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Guenther PM, Kirkpatrick SI, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM, Buckman DW, Dodd KW, et al. The Healthy Eating Index-2010 is a valid and reliable measure of diet quality according to the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. J Nutr. 2014;144(3):399–407. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.183079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

