Abstract
Background/Aim: Medulloblastoma is a rare tumor of adult age, while it occurs more frequently in children. Given the rarity, there is a lack of evidence for the treatment of recurrent disease. Few data are available about salvage re-irradiation collecting very heterogeneous series. Case Report: A 51-year-old male presented with headache, nausea, double vision, and gait disorders. A contrast-enhanced brain-MRI showed the presence of multifocal medulloblastoma. After surgery, adjuvant craniospinal radiotherapy was performed, chemotherapy was stopped due to toxicity. After 27 months, a new MRI and a Methionine-PET revealed a late pontocerebellar relapse; multidisciplinary board decided for a SBRT treatment. The second course of RT was well tolerated and 14 months later, the patient is alive in good general conditions, with no evidence of disease. Conclusion: Our experience supports the use of salvage stereotactic radiotherapy as a safe and effective treatment option.
Keywords: Medulloblastoma, re-irradiation, adult patients
Medulloblastoma is one of the most common central nervous system tumors of childhood (1), while it has an extremely lower incidence in the adult age, particularly in >40 years patients (2). Furthermore, in older patients it may occur with unusual presentations, like multifocal disease, of which only six cases are described in the literature (3-8). Due to its rarity in the older population, pre-operative diagnosis may be challenging since radiological features may differ from pediatric cases, for example in terms of lower contrast enhancement (9). Standard treatments for children are usually based on the multimodal combination of surgery plus adjuvant craniospinal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (10,11).
The extremely rare incidence of medulloblastoma in adult patients renders the therapeutic management of this subset of individuals difficult, with most evidence coming from the adoption of pediatric guidelines that support the role of post-operative chemo-radiation to improve overall survival (12). Actually, for adult patients, the upfront use of chemotherapy is controversial, with many reports suggesting a higher incidence of toxicity in older subjects compared to children (13). Recent molecular analyses provided new data to stratify all medulloblastoma patients in four different subgroups (WNT, SH, group 3 and 4) with different prognosis, although the impact on therapeutic strategy is still limited (14). Moreover, unlike younger patients, adult medulloblastomas have a higher incidence of late relapses, that are usually associated with a poorer prognosis, since there are not enough evidence to recommend a standardized therapeutic approach, that currently may include as alternatives re-resection or re-irradiation or high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation (15,16).
Case Report
In 2016, a 51-year-old male presented at our Center after the recent onset of headache, nausea, double vision, slurred speech, and gait disorders. A contrast-enhanced brain-MRI showed the presence of two cerebellar lesions close to the cerebellar tonsils and vermis (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Preoperative brain MRI in T1-weighted contrast enhanced (right) and T2-weighted (left) sequence.
Subsequently, a right tonsillectomy with a sub-occipital median approach in neuronavigation was performed. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology examination was negative, and a spine-MRI with contrast reported several hyperintense areas in the T2-weighted sequence with radiological features suspected for multifocal neoplastic disease. Histology examination was positive for classic-type medulloblastoma MIB1=20%. No molecular profiling was performed. A multidisciplinary board decided for adjuvant chemo-radiation and the patient underwent craniospinal RT for a total dose of 36 Gy in conventional fractionation plus a sequential boost to posterior fossa for a total dose of 54 Gy. Radiotherapy treatment was performed using Helical Tomotherapy using a thermoplastic mask for immobilization and daily megavoltage CT scan imaging before each fraction. Then, the patient interrupted the planned chemotherapy regimen (CDDP+CCNU+vincristine) after one cycle due to renal toxicity. Follow-up was negative until November 2018, when a brain-MRI reported the presence of a contrast enhanced area in the left cerebello-pontine angle suspected for relapsed disease (Figure 2). This finding was also reported by a Methionine-PET scan that confirmed the presence of an area of pathological uptake. Subsequently, after 27 months from the first treatment, the patient underwent stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy to the site of relapse for a total dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions by means of Helical Tomotherapy. Target volume delineation was performed through MRI-Methionine PET-image fusion, applying to the gross tumor volume (GTV) a 3-mm margin overlapping the brainstem, which was given a higher priority during the planning phase. Treatment was well tolerated, with no observed acute or late toxicity. No other therapies were administered. After 14 months a contrast-enhanced brain-MRI reported no evidence of disease, the patient is alive and in good general conditions. Informed consent was obtained before the start of all the treatment.
Figure 2. Brain MRI in T1-weighted contrast enhanced before stereotactic radiotherapy (left) and after 14 months (right).
Discussion
Currently, a standard treatment strategy for recurrent medulloblastoma is not yet defined and different options may be considered: maximal safe resection where suitable, or radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, or high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation.
External-beam radiotherapy can be offered either in a definitive setting or after maximal safe resection, despite most of the literature reports data concerning exclusive intent. To date, almost 300 cases of re-irradiation after craniospinal radiotherapy are reported in the literature (Table I), but it is hard to compare these data due to the heterogeneity of the cohorts; furthermore, different RT schedules are used with or without chemotherapy, and only a few reports are available on the use of stereotactic radiotherapy (17-32).
Table I. Literature studies of salvage RT after craniospinal irradiation.
2DRT: 2-Dimensional radiotherapy; 3DCRT: 3-dimensional conformal therapy; BID: bis in die; BRT: brachytherapy; CPA: cerebello-pontine angle; CSI: craniospinal irradiation; FL: frontal lobe; IMRT: intensity modulated radiotherapy; LS: leptomeningeal spread; NR: not reported; OS: overall survival; PF: posterior fossa; PL: parietal lobe; RN: radionecrosis; SC: spinal cord; SRS: stereotactic radiosurgery; TL: temporal lobe; VS: ventricular system
The main concern of re-treatment is the higher risk of toxicity, in particular for brain radionecrosis (33,34). Radiobiological studies have described a reduced risk of normal brain radionecrosis when the normalized total dose is lower than 100 Gy, suggesting that tumor diameter, performance status, concurrent chemotherapy and time between the two courses of radiotherapy may be associated to an increased risk of neurotoxicity (35).
Similarly to the spinal cord, animal model studies revealed that the normal brain may recover up to 50% within the first 2 years from initial treatment if doses below tolerance have been delivered (36). In this scenario, when proposing a re-irradiation, the choice of the fractionation regimen is often driven by the presentation of the recurrent disease: while local small relapses may benefit from a focal treatment, like stereotactic radiotherapy, that combines higher therapeutic doses with a lower normal brain exposure, a recurrent larger or disseminated tumor may benefit from less aggressive RT schedules, like conventional or hyperfractionated regimens, that still allow safe delivery of a tumoricidal dose with an acceptable risk of late neurotoxicity.
The evaluation of all these factors focus the need for a careful patient selection process; this is also confirmed by a recent series published by Gupta et al. concerning 28 patients with relapsed medulloblastoma who underwent salvage re-irradiation, performed either with re-craniospinal RT or with focal treatments both in conventional or hyperfractionated regimens (32). The authors reported an acceptable profile of toxicity, describing only one case of symptomatic late radionecrosis after re-craniospinal irradiation.
Bakst et al. also adopted conventional schedules for the re-treatment of 13 patients with relapsed medulloblastoma, collecting 5-years progression-free survival and overall survival of 48% and 65%, respectively, with only one case of radiological in-field brain radionecrosis. The authors also observed better outcomes in patients with no evidence of disease after re-surgical excision, compared to non-surgical cases (29).
The potential advantage of hypofractionation or radiosurgery lies in the possibility to improve local control rates in patients with macroscopic disease, providing more precise irradiation of a small area, with steep dose gradients that may lead to a lower exposure of nearby healthy structures. The use of stereotactic radiosurgery is favorably reported by Napieralska et al. in a series of 14 patients treated with a median dose of 15 Gy in single or in three fractions, with no evidence of brain necrosis and promising results in terms of clinical outcomes (31).
Similar data are reported by Abe et al., in a series of 12 adult and pediatric patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. The authors observed one case of brainstem edema and the patient died after 14 months for tumor dissemination; moreover, two patients developed respectively multiple organ failure and bulbar palsy due to chemotherapy (26). Despite the potential higher risk of metastatic spread, the combination of radio- and chemotherapy must be carefully evaluated in the recurrent setting, especially for adult patients who are more likely to have relevant toxicity given by systemic treatment (13).
Given the excellent performance status of our patient and the long interval of 27 months from the previous craniospinal RT, in our experience we decided to propose stereotactic radiotherapy to the cerebello-pontine angle relapse with the aim to provide a radical treatment to a smaller volume, in order to minimize the risk of toxicity, as also reported by other authors (37).
Concerning chemotherapy, the multidisciplinary board decided not to perform a systemic therapy, due to the high toxicity experienced during the first cycle and the patient was managed solely with stereotactic radiotherapy. The second course of RT was well tolerated, with no relevant side-effects, and after 14 months he is alive and in good general conditions, with no evidence of disease.
Re-irradiation of central nervous system tumors has become of increasing interest since the constant progress of both imaging and radiation technology is leading to a highly accurate targeting of tumor volumes, improving the possibility of a better organ-at-risk sparing. Given the rarity of the disease, especially in adult patients, when proposing re-irradiation, the concern for brain toxicity must be carefully assessed to provide a maximum tailored approach.
To date, literature evidence concerning salvage radiotherapy for relapsed medulloblastoma is scarce and based on heterogeneous series that include both pediatric and adult patients, applying wide different treatment regimens. Our experience reports an unusual presentation of adult medulloblastoma and supports the use of salvage stereotactic radiotherapy for a locally relapsed disease showing excellent results both in terms of safety and clinical outcomes, despite a longer follow up is needed.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Authors’ Contributions
Manuscript drafting: Francesco Cuccia, Gianluca Mortellaro, Giuseppe Craparo; Literature research: Francesco Cuccia, Lucia Ognibene; Conception and final revision: Giuseppe Ferrera, Antonio Lo Casto.
References
- 1.Farwell JR, Dohrmann GJ, Flannery JT. Medulloblastoma in childhood: an epidemiological study. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(4):657–664. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Balducci M, Chiesa S, Chieffo D, Manfrida S, Dinapoli N, Fiorentino A, Miccichè F, Frascino V, Anile C, Valentini V, De Bari B. The role of radiotherapy in adult medulloblastoma: long-term single-institution experience and a review of the literature. J Neurooncol. 2012;106(2):315–323. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0665-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gliemroth J, Kehler U, Knopp U, Reusche E, Nowak G. A multifocal cerebellar and supratentorial medulloblastoma in an adult. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140(7):723–724. doi: 10.1007/s007010050169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Spagnoli D, Tomei G, Masini B, De Santis A, Grimoldi N, Lucarini C, Gaini SM. A case of multifocal cerebellar medulloblastoma in an adult patient. J Neurosurg Sci. 1990;34(3-4):323–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shen WC, Yang CF. Multifocal cerebellar medulloblastoma: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988;12(5):894. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198809010-00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Balik V, Trojanec R, Holzerova M, Tuckova L, Sulla I, Megova M, Vaverka M, Hrabalek L, Ehrmann J. An adult multifocal medulloblastoma with diffuse acute postoperative cerebellar swelling: immunohistochemical and molecular genetics analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2015;38(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10143-014-0556-4. discussion 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saad AG, Balik V, Parvez A, El Jamal SM. Multifocal supra and infratentorial medulloblastoma in an adult: Histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular evaluation of a rare case and review of the literature. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2017;25(10):e89–e94. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hernández Cancela RM, Pombo Otero J, Concha-Lopez A. A case of multifocal medulloblastoma in an adult patient. Rev Esp Patol. 2017;50(1):45–48. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2015.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ciccarino P, Rotilio A, Rossetto M, Manara R, Orvieto E, Berti F, Lombardi G, d’Avella D, Scienza R, Della Puppa A. Multifocal presentation of medulloblastoma in adulthood. J Neurooncol. 2012;107(2):233–237. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0746-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Anagnostopoulos AK, Papathanassiou C, Karamolegou K, Anastasiadou E, Dimas KS, Kontos H, Koutsopoulos A, Prodromou N, Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou F, Tsangaris GT. Proteomic studies of pediatric medulloblastoma tumors with 17p deletion. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(2):1076–1088. doi: 10.1021/pr501219f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tsangaris GT, Dimas K, Malamou A, Katsafadou A, Papathanasiou C, Stravopodis DJ, Vorgias CE, Gazouli M, Anagnostopoulos AK. Molecular proteomic characterization of a pediatric medulloblastoma xenograft. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2017;14(4):267–275. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Majd N, Penas-Prado M. Updates on management of adult medulloblastoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019;20(8):64. doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0663-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beier D, Proescholdt M, Reinert C, Pietsch T, Jones DTW, Pfister SM, Hattingen E, Seidel C, Dirven L, Luerding R, Reijneveld J, Warmuth-Metz M, Bonsanto M, Bremer M, Combs SE, Rieken S, Herrlinger U, Kuntze H, Mayer-Steinacker R, Moskopp D, Schneider T, Beringer A, Schlegel U, Stummer W, Welker H, Weyerbrock A, Paulsen F, Rutkowski S, Weller M, Wick W, Kortmann RD, Bogdahn U, Hau P. Multicenter pilot study of radiochemotherapy as first-line treatment for adults with medulloblastoma (NOA-07) Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(3):400–410. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Buglione M, Ghirardelli P, Triggiani L, Pedretti S, Pasinetti N, De Bari B, Tonoli S, Borghetti P, Spiazzi L, Magrini SM. Radiotherapy for adult medulloblastoma: Long term result from a single institution. A review of prognostic factors and why we do need a multi-institutional cooperative program. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015;20(4):284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Blatt V, Ermani M. Long-term results of a prospective study on the treatment of medulloblastoma in adults. Cancer. 2007;110(9):2035–2041. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Herrlinger U, Steinbrecher A, Rieger J, Hau P, Kortmann RD, Meyermann R, Schabet M, Bamberg M, Dichgans J, Bogdahn U, Weller M. Adult medulloblastoma: prognostic factors and response to therapy at diagnosis and at relapse. J Neurol. 2005;252(3):291–299. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0560-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Privitera G, Acquaviva G, Ettorre GC, Spatola C. Antiangiogenic therapy in the treatment of recurrent medulloblastoma in the adult: case report and review of the literature. J Oncol. 2009;2009:247873. doi: 10.1155/2009/247873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rao AD, Rashid AS, Chen Q, Villar RC, Kobyzeva D, Nilsson K, Dieckmann K, Nechesnyuk A, Ermoian R, Alcorn S, MacDonald SM, Ladra MM, Ford EC, Winey BA, Figueiredo MLS, Chen MJ, Terezakis SA. Reirradiation for recurrent pediatric central nervous system malignancies: A multi-institutional review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(3):634–641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wetmore C, Herington D, Lin T, Onar-Thomas A, Gajjar A, Merchant TE. Reirradiation of recurrent medulloblastoma: does clinical benefit outweigh risk for toxicity. Cancer. 2014;120(23):3731–3737. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buglione M, Triggiani L, Grisanti S, Liserre R, Buttolo L, Gipponi S, Bonetti F, Todeschini A, Spiazzi L, Magrini SM. Retreatment of recurrent adult medulloblastoma with radiotherapy: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2013;7:64. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keshavarzi S, Meltzer H, Ben-Haim S, Newman CB, Lawson JD, Levy ML, Murphy K. Initial clinical experience with frameless optically guided stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy in pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25(7):837–844. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0840-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cieślak E, Kepka L, Fijuth J, Marchel A, Kroh H. Very late relapse of medulloblastoma. Folia Neuropathol. 2004;42(1):49–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Padovani L, Andre N, Gentet JC, Figarella Branger D, Scavarda D, Verschuur A, Chinot O, Cowen D, Muracciole X. Reirradiation and concomitant metronomic temozolomide: an efficient combination for local control in medulloblastoma disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011;33(8):600–604. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182331eaf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Saran F, Baumert BG, Creak AL, Warrington AP, Ashley S, Traish D, Brada M. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of recurrent or residual medulloblastoma/PNET. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50(3):554–560. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Patrice SJ, Tarbell NJ, Goumnerova LC, Shrieve DC, Black PM, Loeffler JS. Results of radiosurgery in the management of recurrent and residual medulloblastoma. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;22(4):197–203. doi: 10.1159/000120901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Abe M, Tokumaru S, Tabuchi K, Kida Y, Takagi M, Imamura J. Stereotactic radiation therapy with chemotherapy in the management of recurrent medulloblastomas. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42(2):81–88. doi: 10.1159/000090460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Milker-Zabel S, Zabel A, Thilmann C, Zuna I, Hoess A, Wannenmacher M, Debus J. Results of three-dimensional stereotactically-guided radiotherapy in recurrent medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2002;60(3):227–233. doi: 10.1023/a:1021184400053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chojnacka M, Skowrońska-Gardas A, Pędziwiatr K, Morawska-Kaczyńska M, Perek M, Perek D. Reirradiation of relapsed brain tumors in children. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2011;17(1):32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bakst RL, Dunkel IJ, Gilheeney S, Khakoo Y, Becher O, Souweidane MM, Wolden SL. Reirradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma. Cancer. 2011;117(21):4977–4982. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Massimino M, Gandola L, Spreafico F, Biassoni V, Luksch R, Collini P, Solero CN, Simonetti F, Pignoli E, Cefalo G, Poggi G, Modena P, Mariani L, Potepan P, Podda M, Casanova M, Pecori E, Acerno S, Ferrari A, Terenziani M, Meazza C, Polastri D, Ravagnani F, Fossati-Bellani F. No salvage using high-dose chemotherapy plus/minus reirradiation for relapsing previously irradiated medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(5):1358–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Napieralska A, Brąclik I, Radwan M, Mandera M, Blamek S. Radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after craniospinal irradiation in children and adults with medulloblastoma and ependymoma. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35(2):267–275. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-4010-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gupta T, Maitre M, Sastri GJ, Krishnatry R, Shirsat N, Epari S, Sahay A, Chinnaswamy G, Patil V, Shetty P, Moiyadi A. Outcomes of salvage re-irradiation in recurrent medulloblastoma correlate with age at initial diagnosis, primary risk-stratification, and molecular subgrouping. J Neurooncol. 2019;144(2):283–291. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03225-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bauman GS, Sneed PK, Wara WM, Stalpers LJ, Chang SM, McDermott MW, Gutin PH, Larson DA. Reirradiation of primary CNS tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36(2):433–441. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00315-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marks JE, Baglan RJ, Prassad SC, Blank WF. Cerebral radionecrosis: incidence and risk in relation to dose, time, fractionation and volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1981;7(2):243–252. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(81)90443-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mayer R, Sminia P. Reirradiation tolerance of the human brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(5):1350–1360. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Withers HR. Biologic basis for altered fractionation schemes. Cancer. 1985;55(9 Suppl):2086–2095. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850501)55:9+<2086::aid-cncr2820551409>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nieder C, Andratschke NH, Grosu AL. Re-irradiation for recurrent primary brain tumors. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(10):4985–4995. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



