Skip to main content
Metallomics: Integrated Biometal Science logoLink to Metallomics: Integrated Biometal Science
. 2022 Mar 31;14(5):mfac024. doi: 10.1093/mtomcs/mfac024

Identification of potential modifier genes in Chinese patients with Wilson disease

Donghu Zhou 1,2,3,5, Siyu Jia 4,5,6,5, Liping Yi 7,8,9,5, Zhen Wu 10,11,12,5, Yi Song 13,14,15, Bei Zhang 16,17,18, Yanmeng Li 19,20,21, Xiaoxi Yang 22,23,24, Anjian Xu 25,26,27, Xiaojin Li 28,29,30, Wei Zhang 31,32,33, Weijia Duan 34,35,36, Zhenkun Li 37,38,39, Saiping Qi 40,41,42, Zhibin Chen 43,44,45, Qin Ouyang 46,47,48, Jidong Jia 49,50,51,, Jian Huang 52,53,54,55,, Xiaojuan Ou 56,57,58,, Hong You 59,60,61,62,
PMCID: PMC9154322  PMID: 35357466

Abstract

The mutations in modifier genes may contribute to some inherited diseases including Wilson disease (WD). This study was designed to identify potential modifier genes that contribute to WD. A total of 10 WD patients with single or no heterozygous ATP7B mutations were recruited for whole-exome sequencing (WES). Five hundred and thirteen candidate genes, of which the genetic variants present in at least two patients, were identified. In order to clarify which proteins might be involved in copper transfer or metabolism processes, the isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) was performed to identify the differentially expressed proteins between normal and CuSO4-treated cell lines. Thirteen genes/proteins were identified by both WES and iTRAQ, indicating that disease-causing variants of these genes may actually contribute to the aberrant copper ion accumulation. Additionally, the c.86C > T (p.S29L) mutation in the SLC31A2 gene (coding CTR2) has a relative higher frequency in our cohort of WD patients (6/191) than reported (0.0024 in gnomAD database) in our healthy donors (0/109), and CTR2S29L leads to increased intracellular Cu concentration and Cu-induced apoptosis in cultured cell lines. In conclusion, the WES and iTRAQ approaches successfully identified several disease-causing variants in potential modifier genes that may be involved in the WD phenotype.

Keywords: Wilson disease, ATP7B, mutation, modifier gene, CTR2, copper uptake

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Identification of modifier genes of Wilson disease.

Introduction

Wilson disease (WD, OMIM entry: 277 900) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder associated with various mutations in the ATP7B gene. It affects 1 in 30 000 individuals with a carrier frequency of 1 in every 90, the common symptoms including abdominal pain, jaundice, personality change, etc. The diagnostic algorithm is based on a diagnostic index (“Leipzig” score) proposed by an expert panel1. This score includes clinical findings (Kayser–Fleischer corneal ring), biochemical findings (low serum copper and ceruloplasmin concentrations, and increased urinary copper excretion), and molecular features (detection of biallelic ATP7B pathogenic variants). The mainstay therapy for WD is copper chelation therapy with penicillamine or trientine.

Previous research has shown the genotype of patients with WD varies between different populations. According to our previous research, in China, about 66.2% of patients with WD have compound heterozygous variants, and only 12.3% are homozygotes.2 However, recent studies have indicated that approximately 12–20% of patients with WD have only one or no heterozygous mutation, whether from China or from Western countries. These patients also have some typical WD phenotypes such as increased urinary copper excretion and low serum ceruloplasmin concentration.2,3

To date, molecular testing methods used to diagnose WD in the clinic have mainly relied on Sanger sequencing.4,5 However, this approach is tedious and ineffective when sequencing large DNA fragments or searching for disease-causing variants in potential modifier genes. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) provides an efficient approach for identifying large fragment deletions and rare mutations6,7, and provides an accurate way to differentiate between systemic errors and actual biological variations.8,9 The application of WES has already exhibited superiority to Sanger sequencing in the clinical genetic diagnosis of several kinds of inherited diseases.10–12

A modifier gene is a gene that, when mutated, does not produce an effect on its own, but may produce or enhance clinical manifestations when coupled with another genetic mutation.13 Several genes have been proposed as potential modifier genes for WD, including ATOX1 (antioxidant copper chaperone 1)14, COMMD1 (copper metabolism domain-containing 1)15, XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis)16, and HFE (hemochromatosis gene).17 However, none of these candidates has been confirmed by additional research.

Copper is an essential micronutrient required for oxygen-dependent enzymes. However, copper in excess is a noxious agent due to the oxidative capacity in biological systems. The opposing forces is balanced by chaperones and membrane transporters, which control copper uptake and moving copper across membranes.18,19 The high-affinity Cu transporter, copper transport protein, CTR1, is responsible for the majority (∼70%) of Cu intake.20 Upon entry, Cu may bind transiently to glutathione and be retrieved by Cu chaperones. Cytosolic Cu chaperone for SOD1 facilitates Cu incorporation, as well as the formation of a disulfide bond.21 ATOX1 binds Cu(I) within the Cys–Gly–Gly–Cys metal-binding site, increasing the delivery of copper to the secretory pathway.22 The P-type ATPase transporters, ATP7A and ATP7B, regulate cytoplasmic copper by pumping them out of cells or into the endomembrane system. In the trans-Golgi network (TGN), ATP7B transfers Cu to the ceruloplasmin, which is then secreted across the basolateral membrane. Cu elevation triggers trafficking of ATP7B from the TGN toward the apical membrane, thus facilitating export of excess Cu.19

The CTR1 and CTR2 copper transporters are influx Cu(I) transporters in mammalian cells. CTR1 has a much higher affinity for copper than CTR2 and largely resides in the plasma membrane. CTR2 has a lower affinity for copper and is mostly associated with vesicular structures inside the cell. Only part of the CTR2 resides in the plasma membrane23, but it plays a role in stabilizing a truncated form of Ctr1 lacking the extracellular domain. Retention of this domain in mice or cells lacking Ctr2 enhances copper uptake.24 Generally, CTR1 mobilizes Cu(I) from the vacuole when Cu(I) is scarce, but the function of CTR2 is far from fully understood. For the WD patients with typical clinical symptoms but only single or no heterozygous ATP7B mutation, it is plausible to hypothesize that the copper transporters (CTR1 and/or CTR2) might act as modifier genes to influence the WD phenotype.

Patients and methods

Diagnostic criteria

A total of 201 patients with WD were recruited from the China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group. After laboratory and genetic tests, diagnosis of WD was established in accordance with the Leipzig score (≥4), and 10 patients with only one or no ATP7B mutation were selected for WES. An additional cohort of 191 patients with WD was recruited to determine the frequency of the CTR2 p.S29L mutation.

Sanger sequencing

Candidate pathogenic mutations in patients with WD and their immediate family members were identified by Sanger sequencing using an ABI 3730 analyser (Applied Biosystem). All of the 21 exons and at least 50 bp of intronic flanking sequences of the ATP7B gene were amplified, using primers reported previously.2 Sites of variation were identified through comparing DNA sequences with the corresponding GenBank reference sequences (GRCh38, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) using Mutation Surveyor software.

Whole-exome sequencing

DNA library preparation and sequencing

Peripheral blood (approximately 2 mL) was collected from the patients, and genomic DNA was extracted using the TIANamp Blood DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., China). DNA libraries were prepared according to Illumina's (USA) protocol. In brief, 3 μg of genomic DNA was fragmented by sonication (Covaris S2, USA). An “A” was then ligated to the 3′-end of the fragmented DNA. The sample was size-selected aiming to obtain segments of 150–∼250 bp for PCR amplification. Enriched libraries were then sequenced using an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer (Illumina) for paired-end reads of 150 bp.

Data analysis

Low-quality variations were filtered out using a quality score ≥20 and the Burrows-Wheeler Alignment tool software package25 was used to align clean reads to the reference human genome (GRCh37). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified using the SOAPsnp program (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapsnp.html), and insertions or deletions (InDels) were identified using GATK (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsa/wiki/index.php/Home_Page). The identified SNPs and InDels were annotated using the Exome-assistant program (http://122.228.158.106/exomeassistant). SNPs and InDels with frequencies >0.01 in 1000 Genome, ESP6500, ExAC_ALL, and ExAC_EAS were removed. Nonsynonymous variants were evaluated by Ployphen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), SIFT (http://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/), and MutationTaster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) programs to predict their pathogenicity.

Cell culture

HEK-293T, BEL-7402, and Huh7 cell lines were purchased from National Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (Shanghai, China), and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. The cell lines were maintained in 1640 (for BEL-7402) or Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (for Human Embryonic Kidney Cells 293T and Huh7) medium (Life Technologies, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies) and antibiotics (100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin).

Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)

Protein extraction and quantification

Huh7 cells (including ATP7B-knockdown and negative control cell lines) were incubated with 100 μM CuSO4 for 0, 24, and 48 hrs. Proteins were extracted using lysis buffer (0.1 M Tris/HCl buffer containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 0.1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 65 mM dithiothreitol, pH 8.0), and sample concentration was determined using a Bradford protein assay kit (Thermo, USA); 50 μg of protein were used for each sample. The detailed protocol for isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) analysis has been published previously.26

Liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry analysis

Liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was performed by the National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing). In brief, protein samples were precipitated with acetone-trichloroacetic acid and trypsin digested to generate proteolytic peptides. Proteolytic peptides were then labeled with iTRAQ reagents. The iTRAQ labels 113–118 were used to separately label the samples at various time points, and labeled samples were pooled before further analysis. The combined peptide mixtures were analysed using LC–MS/MS for both identification and quantification. The “abundances” indicated the quantification of the protein, and the fold change was calculated by comparing the abundances of different samples.

Bioinformatic analysis

The lists of transcription factors, splicing factors, and ion transporters were obtained from the Human Protein Atlas (http://www.proteinatlas.org), RBPmap (http://rbpmap.technion.ac.il/index_DEV.html), and HitPredict (http://www.hitpredict.org/) databases, respectively. Gene ontology (biological process) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis were performed using DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/).

The wild-type and p.S29L (c.86C > T) mutant CTR2-expressed cell lines

Wild-type (WT) and mutant (Mut) human CTR2 cDNA sequences were chemically synthesized by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China) and cloned into the pCDH–EF1–MCS–T2A–copGFP (pCDH) vector (MiaoLing Plasmid Platform, China); HEK-293T (National Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures) lentivirus packaging cell lines were used to generate virus particles. Following co-transfection of pCDH, psPAX2, and pMD2.G plasmids (MiaoLing Plasmid Platform) in to 293T cells, replication-incompetent virions (CTR2WT and CTR2Mut) were released into the culture medium supernatant, and the supernatant were collected after 48 and 72 hrs. The procedure was referred to the instructions provided by addgene (https://www.addgene.org/protocols/lentivirus-production/).

BEL-7402 and Huh7 cells (National Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures) were co-incubated with CTR2WT and CTR2Mut lentivirus for 72 hrs. The copGFP+ cells were selected using a flow cytometer, and were cultured as stable WT and Mut cell lines (BEL-7402CTR2-WT/Mut and Huh7CTR2-WT/Mut).

CCK-8 assays

The cells were seeded onto 96-well plates, 5 × 103 cells/well, in 80 μL of 1640 (BEL-7402 cells) or DMEM (Huh7 cells), and supplemented with of CuSO4 and/or D(−)-penicillamine (D-PEN) (Sigma, USA). After 0, 24, 48, and 72 hrs, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution (Cell Counting Kit, Yeasen Biotechnology, China) dissolved in 90 μl of 1640 or DMEM was added to each well. The plates were incubated for 2 hrs at 37°C, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm.

Flow cytometry

Huh7CTR2-Con/WT/Mut cells were seeded onto 6-well plates overnight. The cells were treated with 200 μM of CuSO4 for 24 hrs, then 1mM D-PEN was added in the freshly changed culture medium for further incubation. After 24 hrs, the cells were collected and washed twice with PBS. The cells were stained with Annexin V-PE/7-AAD (PE Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I, BD Biosciences, USA) on ice for 15 min, flow cytometric analysis was conducted, and apoptotic fractions were determined.

Quantification of copper ion concentration

Huh7CTR2-Con/WT/Mut cells were seeded onto 100 mm cell culture dishes, and supplemented with 200 μM of CuSO4 and/or 1mM D-PEN. After 24 hrs, the cells were harvested and washed twice by 2 mL PBS. The cell number was calculated by TC10 automated cell counter (Bio-Rad, USA). The quantification of copper ion concentration was measured using QuantiChromTM Copper Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, USA).

Statistical analysis

All in vitro experiments were repeated at least three times. Two-tailed unpaired Student's t-tests and one-way ANOVA were used to evaluate differences between groups. GraphPad Prism 7 and MedCalc were used for statistical analyses. All quantitative data are presented as mean ± SD, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Genetic and clinical profiles of the WD patients

Sanger sequencing was performed in our WD patient cohort recruited from the CR-GMLD Group. Single or no ATP7B mutations were detected in 10 of the patients. These patients were selected for further WES. The pathogenicity of the variants was analysed using prediction tools including Polyphen-2, MutationTaster, and SIFT (Table 1). Sanger sequencing identified seven different pathogenic variants in CDS regions, including the most common ATP7B variant p.R778L (3 in 10 patients), five other missense mutations (p.A874V, p.T935M, p.H1019P, p.V1106I, and p.N1270S), and one small In/Del mutation (p.F699-). In patient S3, no pathogenic variant was detected. SNPs were identified in patient S2 (p.S406A, p.V456L, p.K832R, and p.R952K), S3 (p.S406A, p.V456L, p.K832R, and p.R952K), S5 (p.S406A and p.V456L), and S7 (p.S406A, p.V456L, p.K832R, p.R952K, and p.V1140A).

Table 1.

ATP7B pathogenic variants detected in 10 patients with Wilson disease

Pathogenicity
Patient Sanger sequencing Whole-exome sequencing Polyphen-2 MutationTaster SIFT
S1 p.R778L p.R778L Probably damaging Disease causing Damaging
S2 p.V1106I p.V1106I Probably damaging Disease causing Tolerable
S3 -
S4 p.F699- p.F699- Disease causing
S5 p.H1019P p.H1019P Probably damaging Disease causing Damaging
Large fragment deletions (chr13:52 544 737-52 548 212 and chr13:52 549 161-52 585 503)
S6 p.R778L p.R778L Probably damaging Disease causing Damaging
S7 p.T935M p.T935M Probably damaging Disease causing Damaging
S8 p.N1270S p.N1270S Probably damaging Disease causing Damaging
S9 p.A874V p.A874V Probably damaging Disease causing Damaging
S10 p.R778L p.R778L Probably damaging Disease causing Damaging

The clinical profiles of the 10 WD patients, including six males and four females from 10 unrelated families, are summarized in Table 2. In general, these patients had a high Leipzig score (≥4) and a low CP level (<0.2 g/L). Seven of 10 patients were hepatic phenotypes, including abnormal liver biochemistry and cirrhosis, and a hepatic and neurological mixed presentation was observed in the remaining three patients. In addition to the hepatic phenotypes, typical symptoms included tremors and involuntary movements.

Table 2.

The clinical profiles of the 10 Wilson disease patients

Patient Clinical presentation Age Gender Lepziq score Serum copper (μmol/L) Ceruloplasmin (g/L) Urine copper (μg/24 hrs) K-F rings Clinical symptoms Abdominal ultrasound Brain MRI
S1 Hepatic 27 M 4 Not available 0.082 Not available Negative Anorexia and retching for >1 month, transaminase elevated for 1 week Cirrhosis, splenomegaly Not available
S2 Hepatic 44 M 4 Not available <0.01 Not available Not available Abnormal liver function Not available Not available
S3 Mixed 31 M 5 Not available 0.13 400.1 Not available The patient had the onset of seizures at age 7 years and was diagnosed with epilepsy. The patient was found to have liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly, and ascites at age 18 years. Cirrhosis, splenomegaly, ascites, cavernous transformation of portal vein, widened spleen vein, abnormal nodules in hepatic segments Not available
S4 Hepatic 4 W 4 Not available 0.04 88.9 Negative Physical examination revealed abnormal liver function, without jaundice and edema. No abnormality found Abnormalities of the body of bilateral ventricles
S5 Mixed 14 W 5 7.3 0.05 Not available Positive Dysarthria, abnormal gait, abdominal distension, and loss of appetite for 1 month. Physical examination shows splenomegaly. Cirrhosis, splenomegaly Abnormalities of the body of bilateral ventricles
S6 Hepatic 15 W 7 Not available <0.01 649.4 Positive Lower limb edema, rash, facial edema for 1 month Multiple hyperechoic nodules and diffuse disease and multiple hyperechoic nodules of the liver No abnormality found
S7 Hepatic 13 M 5 Not available 0.05 196 Negative Abnormal liver function, accompanied by occasional abdominal discomfort No abnormality found No abnormality found
S8 Hepatic 22 M 4 11.4 0.14 145.2 Not available Physical examination revealed abnormal liver function without any symptoms No abnormality found Left temporal lobe cyst
S9 Mixed 36 M 7 Not available 0.02 2160 Positive Involuntary tremor of head for 7 years Cirrhosis, splenomegaly Multiple ischemic changes in white matter, bilateral ethmoid sinusitis
S10 Hepatic 4 W 5 Not available <0.01 116 Not available Physical examination revealed abnormal liver function, the penicillamine challenge test (+). Not available Not available

The WES was performed by MyGenostics Inc. (Beijing, China). In addition of the pathogenic variants we detected by Sanger sequencing, in patient S5, we identified large fragment deletions (chr13:52 544 737-52 548 212 and chr13:52 549 161-52 585 503) in one of the ATP7B alleles. These mutations were identified by WES, but failed to be detected by Sanger sequencing (Table 1). Pedigree analysis revealed that the patient was a compound heterozygote.

Discovering potential modifier genes in nine WD patients

We analysed the WES data of the remaining nine patients with WD. Variants with a frequency <0.01 in 1000 Genome, ESP6500, ExAC_ALL, and ExAC_EAS databases were selected for further analysis. Multiple function prediction software, including Polyphen-2, MutationTaster, and SIFT, were used to predict the pathogenicity of nonsynonymous variants with uncertain clinical significance. Five hundred and thirteen candidate genes, of which the genetic variants present in at least two patients, were finally identified (Supplemental File S1). These candidate genes included 23 transcription factors and two splicing factors (Table 3), and 14 metal ion transport protein encoding genes [including SLC31A2 (encoding CTR2); Table 3]. These transporters might have synergistic or competitive effects on copper transport. However, no metal ion metabolism-related biological processes were significantly enriched (Supplementary Fig. S1). No pathogenicity variants were identified in those previously reported modifier genes, including ATOX1, COMMD1, XIAP, and HFE.

Table 3.

Genetic variants in transcription factors, splicing factors, and metal ion transporters

Gene Nucleotide Changes Amino Acid Changes Gene Type ExAC EAS/ALL gnomAD EAS/ALL dbSNP PolyPhen-2 Mutation Taster SIFT InterVar Disease (OMIM)
Transcription factors
AR c.1369_1377
delGGCGGCGGC
p.457_459
delGGG
het -/- 0.0366/0.0378 Uncertain 313 200|300 068|312 300|300 633|176 807
AR c.1369_1374
delGGCGGC
p.457_458
delGG
hom -/- 0.0026/0.0354 Uncertain 313 200|300 068|312 300|300 633|176 807
FOXI2 c.182C > A p.P61Q het -/- 0.0074/0.0004 rs118034115 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
FOXK2 c.1899G > C p.K633N het 0.0099/0.0007 0.008/0.0005 rs117690256 Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
FOXK2 c.500C > T p.A167V het 0.0135/0.001 0.0167/0.0009 rs150523977 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
FOXO3 c.1141dupG p.L382Afs*2 het -/- 0/0 rs34133353 Uncertain #N/A
FOXO3 c.184G > A p.D62N het 0.0043/0.0022 0.0043/0.0002 rs532258926 Benign Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
GLI2 c.3623G > T p.R1208L het -/- -/- Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Uncertain 615 849|610 829
KLF4 c.1100-7C > A het 0.0115/0.0011 0.0123/0.0006 rs188071068 Uncertain #N/A
MGA c.9112C > T p.R3038W het 0.0044/0.0004 0.0037/0.0002 rs117068470 Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
NCOR2 c.1529_1531
delAGC
p.510delQ het 0.0031/0.0036 -/- rs753830534 Uncertain #N/A
NCOR2 c.2033A > C p.N678T het -/- -/- Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
NFE2L3 c.166G > C p.A56P het -/- 0.0012/0.00 006 525 rs748882173 Possibly_damaging Polymorphism Damaging Uncertain #N/A
NR1H2 c.695C > T p.A232V het 0.0002/0.0002 -/- rs201627190 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
NR1H2 c.211C > T p.R71C het 0.0008/0.00 005 957 0/0.00 003 234 rs756403846 Benign Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
PDX1 c.127_129
delCCG
p.43delP het -/0.0032 0.0006/0.00 003 243 rs752633548 Uncertain 606 392|260 370|125 853
RUNX2 c.232_234
delGCG
p.78delA het -/0.0006 0/0.00 003 362 rs756546787 Uncertain 119 600|156 510
TRPS1 c.592A > G p.K198E het -/0.000 008 282 -/- rs754340524 Benign Polymorphism Damaging Uncertain 190 350|190 351
ZC3H6 c.871C > G p.Q291E het 0.0052/0.0003 0.0065/0.0004 rs375792649 Benign Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
ZFHX2 c.1108G > T p.A370S het -/- -/- Polymorphism Damaging Uncertain 147 430|613 750
ZNF23 c.583C > A p.P195T het 0.0054/0.0004 0.0068/0.0004 rs76530144 Possibly_damaging Polymorphism Damaging Likely_benign #N/A
ZNF333 c.452T > C p.I151T het 0.0025/0.0002 0.0018/0.00 009 684 rs141998898 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
ZNF438 c.590G > A p.G197E het 0.0074/0.0006 0.0062/0.0003 rs148252990 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Likely_benign #N/A
ZNF469 c.11053C > T p.R3685C het 0.0025/0.00 006 775 0.0043/0.0003 rs748126365 Benign Polymorphism Damaging Uncertain 229 200
ZNF469 c.1663G > A p.D555N het 0.0047/0.0002 0.0025/0.0001 rs749179728 Possibly_damaging Polymorphism Damaging Uncertain 229 200
ZNF644 c.2707G > A p.G903R het -/- -/- Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain 614 167
ZNF655 c.413T > C p.F138S het 0.0156/0.0011 0.0167/0.0009 rs149822831 Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
ZNF669 c.89G > T p.R30L het 0.0157/0.0011 0.0111/0.0006 rs201216518 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Likely_benign #N/A
ZSCAN25 c.307C > T p.R103W het 0.0035/0.0015 0.0055/0.0014 rs145815306 Benign Polymorphism Damaging Uncertain #N/A
Splicing factors
ANKHD1 c.74C > T p.P25L het 0.0013/0.0001 0.0018/0.00 009 718 rs557072130 Benign Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
RBM45 c.652A > G p.R218G het 0.0054/0.0004 0.008/0.0004 rs138537367 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
Metal ion transporters
ABCA10 c.3103T > C p.S835P het -/- -/- Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
ABCA10 c.2260C > T p.R754X het 0.0071/0.0005 0.0025/0.0001 rs190646470 Disease_causing Uncertain #N/A
ATP6V1C2 c.923G > A p.G308E het 0.0047/0.0004 0.0062/0.0003 rs117054621 Benign Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
CACNA1F c.3094G > A p.E1032K het -/0.00 006 846 0/0.00 004 745 rs200976011 Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain 300 071|300 476|300 600
KCNG4 c.778T > C p.Y260H het 0.0076/0.0006 0.0105/0.0005 rs117787002 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
KCNJ12 c.139G > A p.V47I het 0.0075/0.0011 0.0032/0.0006 rs201403828 Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
SLCO1A2 c.1681A > G p.I561V het 0.0106/0.0008 0.0117/0.0006 rs116587731 Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
SLCO1A2 c.1736dupG p.T580Nfs*5 het 0.0007/0.00 005 773 0.0006/0.00 003 228 rs3830207 Uncertain #N/A
SLC26A9 c.2621delC p.P874Hfs*19 het 0.0069/0.0006 0.0111/0.0006 rs536446020 Uncertain #N/A
SLC31A2 c.86C > T p.S29L het 0.0022/0.0002 0.0024/0.0002 rs200288219 Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
SLC34A3 c.473C > T p.P158L het 0.0002/0.00 001 754 -/- rs771246525 Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain 241 530
SLC39A4 c.592G > A p.A198T het 0.0016/0.0002 0.0012/0.0001 rs781818806 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Uncertain 201 100
SLC5A3 c.1415A > G p.Y472C het 0.0074/0.0006 0.0099/0.0005 rs117638044 Benign Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
SLC7A2 c.1301A > G p.Y434C het 0.0017/0.0002 -/- rs201373242 Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A

dbSNP: Database for single nucleotide polymorphisms; EAS: East Asian.

We next examined which proteins might be involved in copper transfer and metabolism processes, or affected by copper stimulation. The iTRAQ was performed to identify proteins differentially expressed between normal and Cu-stimulated cell lines. We generated the ATP7B-knockdown stable Huh7 cell lines by lentivirus. The Huh7ATP7B-NC and Huh7ATP7B-KD cells were co-incubated with 200 μM of CuSO4 for 0, 24, and 48 hrs, then the cells were harvested and protein samples were digested to generate proteolytic peptides. The proteolytic peptides were labeled with iTRAQ reagents. Protein expression patterns were quite similar in Huh7ATP7B-NC and Huh7ATP7B-KD cell lines (Fig. 1A and B). Proteins with 1.2-fold increase or 0.83-fold decrease and P-value (<0.05)27–29 were considered differentially expressed. Up-regulated (n = 363) and down-regulated (n = 949) proteins were identified (Supplemental File S2). KEGG analysis revealed that the metabolism-related pathways were highly enriched by those down-regulated proteins; while the up-regulated proteins were mainly functioning in nervous system disease–related pathways, including Alzheimer disease, Huntington disease, and Parkinson disease–related pathways (Fig. 1C), which consistent with the typical clinical features of WD (liver abnormalities and neurological symptoms).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The protein expression changes in Cu-stimulated cell lines. (A) and (B) The protein expression patterns were quite similar after Cu stimulation at various time points in Huh7ATP7B-NC and Huh7ATP7B-KD cells. (C) KEGG analysis revealed that the metabolism-related pathways were highly enriched by those down-regulated proteins, while the up-regulated proteins were mainly functioning in nervous system disease–related pathways.

Thirteen genes/proteins were identified in both WES and iTRAQ data, including TTN, LAMA5, PRSS1, PLEKHA7, CDC27, DYNC2H1, FBLIM1, FDXR, MRTFB, NLRP13, PISD, NOP53, and PIH1D1 (Table 4). Only PLEKHA7 was reported to regulate the localization and function of ATP7A to promote copper extrusion in elevated copper through WW–PLEKHAs (PLEKHA5, PLEKHA6, PLEKHA7)–PDZD11 complexes30,31, no reports published to date indicate that the rest proteins are involved in copper ion intercellular transportation or metabolism processes. The molecular basis through which these proteins may be involved in WD requires further investigation. For some of the potential copper responsive proteins reported previously, the information from iTRAQ, WES, and literature search, were combined together in Table 5.

Table 4.

Genetic variants in 13 candidate genes/proteins that identified in both whole-exome sequencing and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation data

Gene Nucleotide Changes Amino Acid changes Gene Type ExAC EAS/ALL gnomAD EAS/ALL dbsnp150 PolyPhen-2 Mutation Taster SIFT InterVar Disease (OMIM)
TTN c.38708-4T > C Splicing het 0.0083/0.0077 0.0049/0.0057 rs200819643 Uncertain #N/A
TTN c.22544T > C p.I7515T het 0.0006/0.00 004 208 0.0003/0.00 003 672 rs199918663 Benign Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
TTN c.44174G > A p.R14725H het 0.019/0.0014 0.0164/0.0012 rs55677134 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Likely_benign #N/A
LAMA5 c.7145T > G p.M2382R het 0.0001/0.000 008 417 0.0001/0.000 008 215 rs774236266 Probably_damaging Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
PRSS1 c.623G > C p.G208A het 0.0091/0.0007 0.0092/0.0007 rs189270875 Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain Pancreatitis, chronic
PRSS1 c.637G > A p.V213I het 0.0079/0.0032 0.0001/0.00 001 641 rs200902389 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Likely_benign #N/A
PRSS1 c.652G > T p.D218Y het 0.0002/0.00 007 415 0.0003/0.00 004 471 rs574391339 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
CDC27 c.628_630delATT p.210delI het -/- -/- Uncertain #N/A
CDC27 c.477_478insCCCTTTGAATCATGATGTGAAATAGGGGG p.E160_K161delinsPFESX het -/- -/- Uncertain #N/A
CDC27 c.1750A > G p.S584G het -/- 0/0 rs62075623 Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
CDC27 c.1456A > C p.N486H het 0.0009/0.0008 0.0005/0.0002 rs62077261 Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
CDC27 c.1424T > G p.M475R het -/- 0.0002/0.0001 rs74496366 Benign Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
CDC27 c.627A > C p.T209T het -/- -/- rs144985864 Likely_benign #N/A
DYNC2H1 c.2909A > G p.N970S het -/- -/- Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
FBLIM1 c.1092_1093del p.T365Efs*12 het -/- -/- Uncertain #N/A
FDXR c.11G > A p.R4H het -/- -/- Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A
FDXR c.1252G > A p.G418S het 0.0031/0.0008 0.002/0.0009 rs141101303 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
MRTFB c.683C > A p.T228N het 0.0001/0.000 008 273 0.0002/0.00 001 231 rs747644210 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
NLRP13 c.364C > G p.L122V het 0.0042/0.0003 0.0029/0.0002 rs141703645 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
NOP53 c.1309A > G p.I437V het 0.0046/0.0003 0.0041/0.0003 rs199555316 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
PIH1D1 c.727C > T p.R243C het 0.007/0.0024 0.0079/0.0023 rs149419497 Possibly_damaging Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
PISD c.187G > A p.V63I het 0.0101/0.0008 0.0102/0.0007 rs183406976 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Likely_benign #N/A
PISD c.667T > G p.S223A het -/- -/- Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
PLEKHA7 c.2585C > T p.P862L het 0.0046/0.0004 0.0055/0.0003 rs201660932 Benign Disease_causing Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
PLEKHA7 c.1037G > A p.R346H het 0.004/0.0003 0.0018/0.00 009 688 rs78500033 Benign Polymorphism Tolerated Uncertain #N/A
PLEKHA7 c.157C > T p.R53C het 0.0131/0.001 0.0105/0.0006 rs201642255 Probably_damaging Disease_causing Damaging Uncertain #N/A

Table 5.

Potential copper responsive proteins in WES and iTRAQ data

Potential copper responsive proteins Mutation (WES) Protein expression (iTRAQ) Literature (PMID)
AP1S1 <1.2-fold change 27 603 756
ABCA12 546 910
ATOX1 Down-regulation 12 539 964
ATP11A Down-regulation 27 603 756
ATP6AP1 Up-regulation 27 603 756
ATP7A 23 064 757
CCS <1.2-fold change 12 539 964
Ceruloplasmin 11 461 924
CLC7 20 530 571
COMMD6 Up-regulation 27 603 756
COMMD9 Up-regulation 27 603 756
COX1 16 760 263
COX11 25 926 683
COX17 <1.2-fold change 18 458 339
COX2 16 760 263
DMT1 26 294 671
GRX1 20 566 629
P2RX4 Down-regulation 27 603 756
SCO1 Down-regulation 18 458 339
SCO2 Down-regulation 24 403 053
SLC12A2 Down-regulation 27 603 756
SLC22A18 Up-regulation 27 603 756
SLC25A20 Down-regulation 27 603 756
SLC31A1 (CTR1) Down-regulation 11 734 551
SLC31A2 (CTR2) c.86C > T, p.S29L 26 342 034
SLC33A1 Down-regulation 27 603 756
SLC38A1 Down-regulation 27 603 756
SLC39A5 15 322 118
SLC7A2 c.1301A > G, p.Y434C <1.2-fold change 27 603 756
SOD1 <1.2-fold change 12 539 964
STEAP 16 609 065

iTRAQ: isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation.

The CTR2 p.S29L variant promotes the Cu-induced apoptosis in BEL-7402 and Huh7 cells

CTR2 is an influx Cu transporter in mammalian cells. Because of the low affinity to copper ion, the function of CTR2 is still not fully understood. Our WES analysis identified a c.86C > T missense mutation in exon 3 of the SLC31A2 gene. An additional 191 patients with WD and 109 healthy donors were recruited for detecting the SLC31A2 c.86C > T (CTR2 p.S29L) variant using Sanger sequencing (Fig. 2A). Our results showed a much higher SLC31A2 c.86C > T frequency in our WD cohort (6/191, 0.0314) than in East Asian (0.0024 in gnomAD database, P < 0.0001, test for one proportion) or worldwide (0.0002 in gnomAD database, P < 0.0001, test for one proportion) populations. Furthermore, none of the 109 healthy donors carried the SLC31A2 c.86C > T variant; despite this, no significant difference was observed (P = 0.090, Fisher exact probability), probably because of the extremely low frequency even in WD patients and the limited number of healthy donors. Multiple function prediction software, including Polyphen-2, MutationTaster, and SIFT, indicated that this single-base substitution mutation has strong pathogenicity (Table 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The pathogenicity of CTR2 p.S29L variant. (A) Sanger sequencing confirmed the variant of SLC31A2 c.86C > T (CTR2 p.S29L). (B) The RNA expression of wild-type (WT) and mutant CTR2 in Huh7 and BEL-7402 cells. (C) Overexpression of mutant CTR2 caused a greater amount of Cu-induced apoptosis than their WT counterparts, and D(−)-penicillamine (D-PEN) reversed the phenotype. (D) CuSO4 incubation caused an enhanced uptake of the copper ion in Huh7 cells, and D-PEN was able to decrease the intracellular copper concentration. The Cu concentration has been normalized to cell number (per 106 cells). (E) The mutant CTR2 caused significant reduced survival rate in Huh7ATP7B-KD cells. *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01.

We preliminarily assessed the pathogenicity of CTR2 p.S29L in cultured cell lines. Considering the low expression of endogenous CTR2 in BEL-7402 and Huh7 cells, we constructed BEL-7402CTR2-WT/Mut and Huh7CTR2-WT/Mut stable cell lines by directly overexpression of CTR2-WT/Mut genes using lentivirus (Fig. 2B). The cells were seeded onto 96-well plates and co-incubated with 200 μM of CuSO4 for 24 hrs, then 1 mM  D-PEN was added in the freshly changed culture medium for further incubation. CTR2S29L caused a greater amount of Cu-induced apoptosis in both BEL-7402CTR2-Mut and Huh7CTR2-Mut cells after 24 hrs (Fig. 2C). The Cu-induced phenotype could be rescued by 1 mM of D-PEN at 48 and 72 hrs, in cells with negative control, WT, or mutant CTR2.

The apoptosis of the Cu-stimulated cells was detected by flow cytometry. After co-incubation with 200 μM of CuSO4 for 24 hrs, 19.935% of cells were apoptotic in Cu-stimulated Huh7CTR2-Mut cells (15.643% in Huh7CTR2-WT cells), and 1mM of D-PEN reduced the proportion to 12.730% (10.408% in Huh7CTR2-WT cells) (Fig. 3). The increased Cu-induced apoptosis might be due to the enhanced uptake of the copper ion. We further assessed the intracellular Cu concentration in Huh7 cells, with CuSO4 and/or D-PEN stimulation. CuSO4 incubation caused an enhanced uptake of the copper ion in Huh7 cells, and D-PEN was able to decrease the intracellular copper concentration (Fig. 2D).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The flow cytometry indicated the apoptotic proportion of the Cu-stimulated cells. Copper stimulation induced more apoptosis in cells expressing wild-type (WT) and Mut CTR2. 15.643 and 19.935% of cells were apoptotic in Cu-stimulated Huh7CTR2-WT and Huh7CTR2-Mut cells, respectively, and 1 mM of D(−)-penicillamine (D-PEN) reduced the proportion to 10.408 and 12.730%.

We further used siRNA pools to knock down ATP7B gene in Huh7 cells that express NC, WT, and mutant CTR2. The knockdown of ATP7B gene caused varying degrees of apoptosis in Cu-stimulated Huh7 cells, including the cells that with only endogenous CTR2. Although the cells with WT CTR2 also revealed enhanced apoptosis than negative controls, the cells with mutant CTR2 showed significant reduced survival rate compared with their WT counterparts at 24 hrs (Fig. 2E).

Discussion

Although with only single or no heterozygous mutations, some of the patients may still exhibit severe WD manifestations, they do not obviously differ from those with pathogenic homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations. In the current study, all of the 21 exons and at least 50 bp of intronic flanking sequences of the ATP7B gene were amplified by Sanger sequencing, and the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification test was performed to make sure that there was no large deletions in the promotor region of the ATP7B gene (data not shown). To our knowledge, no pathogenic mutations in deep intronic sequences that cause WD have been reported. Thus, the phenotypic variability and incomplete penetrance observed in WD suggests the involvement of modifier genes. To date, rare variants in several genes have been associated with WD, and a recent report using WES showed an increased and reduced risk of neurological presentation by variants in ESD and INO80 genes, respectively.32 Furthermore, rare APOE and MBD6 variants are associated with lower risk of early onset WD.32

Although the search for WD modifier genes is difficult, it is worth pursuing. The identification of these modifiers may provide a better understanding of the biological pathways that WD indirectly affects, and could also direct therapy possibilities for patients with WD.33 Several strategies have been proved effective in identifying modifiers, including linkage analysis, association studies, biology-driven approaches, and systematic screens.33 WES captures and sequences the entire exome; in the human genome, WES covers approximately 22 000 protein-coding genes.34 This approach can also be used to capture low-frequency copy number variations or complicated In/Del mutations.34 In this study, WES identified two large fragments deleted in the ATP7B gene in one of our patients, which was not detected by Sanger sequencing. However, a WES strategy might also be disappointing when searching for potential modifier genes, especially where limited samples are available. Here, we identified 513 potential modifiers with genetic variants in at least two patients, but no metal ion metabolism-related biological processes were significantly enriched. The genes with potential mutations within the 3′ or 5′ UTRs (untranslated regions) which encode copper-binding proteins, may serve as modifier genes. The targeted next-generation sequencing enables rapid identification of genetic variations of a series of gene sets, both in exonic, intronic, and UTR regions. Thus, using the targeted next-generation sequencing for rare pathogenic mutations of copper metabolism-related genes will be helpful in searching the potential modifier genes of WD. Therefore, it may be wiser to focus on a more limited number of genes, the so-called candidate genes, on the basis of biological knowledge or molecular experiments.

To date, only a limited number of the variants identified in “modifier genes” have been confirmed by molecular experiments or other research. Using WES and iTRAQ approaches, we identified 13 candidate modifier genes, rare variants of which were supposed to be highly involved in the WD phenotype. However, the function annotations in the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/) did not indicate a relationship between those candidates and WD phenotype. To our knowledge, so far, only PLEKHA7 was reported to regulate the localization and function of ATP7A to promote copper extrusion in elevated copper through WW–PLEKHAs (PLEKHA5, PLEKHA6, PLEKHA7)–PDZD11 complexes30,31; no reports published to date indicate that the rest of the proteins are involved in copper ion intercellular transportation or metabolism processes. The expression levels of those proteins were changed under copper stimulation, but we are still not sure whether these candidates are eventually involved in the copper metabolism process, and if so, how they contributed to the WD phenotype was also largely unknown.

Although the differential expression of CTR2 was not detected in our iTRAQ analysis, the CTR2 p.S29L may also lead to the change of function of WT CTR2 even if no mutation-induced degradation happens. Although most of the CTR2 is localized in endosomes and lysosomes23, the biogenesis of the CTR1, the main Cu(I) influx transporter in mammalian cells, requires the existence of CTR2.24 CTR2 might modulate Cu(I) uptake by controlling the expression or function of CTR1, and primarily functions as a regulator of influx, but has a limited effect on Cu efflux.35,36 Here we reported a relative high patient frequency (6/191, 0.0314) of the CTR2 p.S29L (SLC31A2 c.86C > T) variant in our cohort of 191 WD patients, and even higher in atypical WD patients (2/9, 0.222), suggesting a specific effect of CTR2 p.S29L on atypical WD patients without the classical ATP7B biallelic mutation. To date, no reports have indicated a direct association between CTR2 and WD, but our study indicated that CTR2 p.S29L may be an important pathogenetic variant in Chinese WD patients, especially in those with atypical disease-causing genotype of ATP7B gene. However, because of the limited number of the patients carrying CTR2 p.S29L variant, we were not able to observe if they had any differences in clinical manifestations with other WD patients. In our study, when incubated with CuSO4 solution, increased level of apoptosis was observed in CTR2S29L-overexpressed cell lines. These results suggest that the CTR2 p.S29L variant might cause more copper accumulation than does the WT protein, and that CTR2 p.S29L may contribute to the clinical manifestations of WD. However, whether CTR1 is also involved in this process remains unclear, and more in-depth molecular research is urgently needed.

Contributor Information

Donghu Zhou, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Siyu Jia, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Liping Yi, Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, Beijing, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Zhen Wu, Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, Beijing, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Yi Song, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Bei Zhang, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Yanmeng Li, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Xiaoxi Yang, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Anjian Xu, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Xiaojin Li, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Wei Zhang, Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, Beijing, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Weijia Duan, Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, Beijing, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Zhenkun Li, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Saiping Qi, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Zhibin Chen, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Qin Ouyang, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Jidong Jia, Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, Beijing, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Jian Huang, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, Beijing, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Xiaojuan Ou, Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, Beijing, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Hong You, Experimental Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, Beijing, China; Clinical Research Center for Rare Liver Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, On behalf of China Registry of Genetic/Metabolic Liver Diseases (CR-GMLD) Group, Beijing, China.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (no. 7222036), the Digestive Medical Coordinated Development Center of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals (nos. XXX0101, XXZ0501, XXT03), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81800451).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University (no. 2019-P2-245-01).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Data availability

The data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author contributions

J.H. and X.O. designed the study, D.Z., S.J., L.Y., and Z.W. analysed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. S.J., Y.S., B.Z., Y.L., A.X., and X.L. performed the experiments. X.Y., Z.L., S.Q., Z.C., and Q.O. analysed the WES data and prepared the figures and tables. W.Z. and W.D. provided patients’ samples, clinical data, or both. J.J., J.H., X.O., and H.Y. advised on the conception, designed the study, and supervised the project. J.H. revised the paper. All authors vouch for the respective data and analysis, approved the final version, and agreed to publish the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Ferenci P., Caca K., Loudianos G., Mieli-Vergani G., Tanner S., Sternlieb I., Schilsky M., Cox D., Berr F., Diagnosis and phenotypic classification of Wilson disease, Liver Int., 2003, 23 (3), 139–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Li X., Zhang W., Zhou D., Lv T., Xu A., Wang H., Zhao X., Zhang B., Li Y., Jia S., Wang Yu, Wang X., Wu Z., Duan W., Wang Q., Nan Y., Shang J., Jiang W., Chen Y., Zheng S., Liu M., Sun L., You H., Jia J., Ou X., Huang J., Complex ATP7B mutation patterns in Wilson disease and evaluation of a yeast model for functional analysis of variants, Hum. Mutat., 2019, 40 (5), 552–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ferenci P., Stremmel W., Członkowska A., Szalay F., Viveiros A., Stättermayer A. F., Bruha R., Houwen R., Pop T. L., Stauber R., Gschwantler M., Pfeiffenberger J., Yurdaydin C., Aigner E., Steindl‐Munda P., Dienes H.-P., Zoller H., Weiss K. H., Age and sex but not ATP7B genotype effectively influence the clinical phenotype of Wilson disease, Hepatology, 2019, 69 (4), 1464–1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kanzi A. M., San J. E., Chimukangara B., Wilkinson E., Fish M., Ramsuran V., De Oliveira T., Next generation sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of family genetic inheritance, Front. Genet., 2020, 11, 544162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R., DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1977, 74 (12), 5463–5467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang X., Exome sequencing greatly expedites the progressive research of mendelian diseases, Front. Med., 2014, 8 (1), 42–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Posey J. E., O'donnell-Luria A. H., Chong J. X., Harel T., Jhangiani S. N., Coban Akdemir Z. H., Buyske S., Pehlivan D., Carvalho C. M. B., Baxter S., Sobreira N., Liu P., Wu N., Rosenfeld J. A., Kumar S., Avramopoulos D., White J. J., Doheny K. F., Witmer P. D., Boehm C., Sutton V. R., Muzny D. M., Boerwinkle E., Günel M., Nickerson D. A., Mane S., Macarthur D. G., Gibbs R. A., Hamosh A., Lifton R. P., Matise T. C., Rehm H. L., Gerstein M., Bamshad M. J., Valle D., Lupski J. R., Insights into genetics, human biology and disease gleaned from family based genomic studies, Genet. Med., 2019, 21 (4), 798–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Retterer K., Juusola J., Cho M. T., Vitazka P., Millan F., Gibellini F., Vertino-Bell A., Smaoui N., Neidich J., Monaghan K. G., Mcknight D., Bai R., Suchy S., Friedman B., Tahiliani J., Pineda-Alvarez D., Richard G., Brandt T., Haverfield E., Chung W. K., Bale S., Clinical application of whole-exome sequencing across clinical indications, Genet. Med., 2016, 18 (7), 696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Eldomery M. K., Coban-Akdemir Z., Harel T., Rosenfeld J. A., Gambin T., Stray-Pedersen A., Küry S., Mercier S., Lessel D., Denecke J., Wiszniewski W., Penney S., Liu P., Bi W., Lalani S. R., Schaaf C. P., Wangler M. F., Bacino C. A., Lewis R. A., Potocki L., Graham B. H., Belmont J. W., Scaglia F., Orange J. S., Jhangiani S. N., Chiang T., Doddapaneni H., Hu J., Muzny D. M., Xia F., Beaudet A. L., Boerwinkle E., Eng C. M., Plon S. E., Sutton V. R., Gibbs R. A., Posey J. E., Yang Y., Lupski J. R., Lessons learned from additional research analyses of unsolved clinical exome cases, Genome Med., 2017, 9 (1), 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gorski M. M., Blighe K., Lotta L. A., Pappalardo E., Garagiola I., Mancini I., Mancuso M. E., Fasulo M. R., Santagostino E., Peyvandi F., Whole-exome sequencing to identify genetic risk variants underlying inhibitor development in severe hemophilia a patients, Blood, 2016, 127 (23), 2924–2933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gambin T., Akdemir Z. C., Yuan B., Gu S., Chiang T., Carvalho C. M. B., Shaw C., Jhangiani S., Boone P. M., Eldomery M. K., Karaca E., Bayram Y., Stray-Pedersen A., Muzny D., Charng W. L., Bahrambeigi V., Belmont J. W., Boerwinkle E., Beaudet A. L., Gibbs R. A., Lupski J. R., Homozygous and hemizygous CNV detection from exome sequencing data in a mendelian disease cohort, Nucleic Acids Res., 2017, 45 (4), 1633–1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Mueller J. J., Schlappe B. A., Kumar R., Olvera N., Dao F., Abu-Rustum N., Aghajanian C., Delair D., Hussein Y. R., Soslow R. A., Levine D. A., Weigelt B., Massively parallel sequencing analysis of mucinous ovarian carcinomas: genomic profiling and differential diagnoses, Gynecol. Oncol., 2018, 150 (1), 127–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wallace A. S., Schmidt C., Schachner M., Wegner M., Anderson R. B., L1cam acts as a modifier gene during enteric nervous system development, Neurobiol. Dis., 2010, 40 (3), 622–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Simon I., Schaefer M., Reichert J., Stremmel W., Analysis of the human atox 1 homologue in Wilson patients, World J. Gastroenterol, 2008, 14 (15), 2383–2387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bost M., Piguet-Lacroix G., Parant F., Wilson C. M. R., Molecular analysis of Wilson patients: direct sequencing and MLPA analysis in the ATP7B gene and atox1 and COMMD1 gene analysis, J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol., 2012, 26 (2-3), 97–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Weiss K. H., Runz H., Noe B., Gotthardt D. N., Merle U., Ferenci P., Stremmel W., Füllekrug J., Genetic analysis of BIRC4/XIAP as a putative modifier gene of Wilson disease, J. Inherit. Metab. Dis., 2010, 33 (S3), 233–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pfeiffenberger J., Gotthardt D. N., Herrmann T., Seeßle J., Merle U., Schirmacher P., Stremmel W., Weiss K. H., Iron metabolism and the role of HFE gene polymorphisms in Wilson disease, Liver Int., 2012, 32 (1), 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lutsenko S., Copper trafficking to the secretory pathway, Metallomics, 2016, 8 (9), 840–852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hartwig C., Zlatic S. A., Wallin M., Vrailas-Mortimer A., Fahrni C. J., Faundez V., Trafficking mechanisms of p-type ATPase copper transporters, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2019, 59, 24–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lee J., Peña M. M. O., Nose Y., Thiele D. J., Biochemical characterization of the human copper transporter Ctr1, J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 277 (6), 4380–4387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Maryon E. B., Molloy S. A., Kaplan J. H., Cellular glutathione plays a key role in copper uptake mediated by human copper transporter 1, Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 2013, 304 (8), C768–C779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kahra D., Kovermann M., Wittung-Stafshede P., The C-terminus of human copper importer Ctr1 acts as a binding site and transfers copper to Atox1, Biophys. J., 2016, 110 (1), 95–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Van Den Berghe P. V. E., Folmer D. E., Malingré H. E. M., Van Beurden E., Klomp A. E. M., Van De Sluis B., Merkx M., Berger R., Klomp L. W. J., Human copper transporter 2 is localized in late endosomes and lysosomes and facilitates cellular copper uptake, Biochem. J., 2007, 407 (1), 49–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Öhrvik H., Nose Y., Wood L. K., Kim B. E., Gleber S. C., Ralle M., Thiele D. J., Ctr2 regulates biogenesis of a cleaved form of mammalian Ctr1 metal transporter lacking the copper- and cisplatin-binding ecto-domain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2013, 110 (46), E4279–E4288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Li H., Durbin R., Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform, Bioinformatics, 2009, 25 (14), 1754–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhang J., Hao N., Liu W., Lu M., Sun L., Chen N., Wu M., Zhao X., Xing B., Sun W., He F., In-depth proteomic analysis of tissue interstitial fluid for hepatocellular carcinoma serum biomarker discovery, Br. J. Cancer, 2017, 117 (11), 1676–1684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li X., Qiao H., Qin F., Cheng G., Liu J., Li H., Gu S., Jin Y., Comparative analysis of iTRAQ-based proteome profiles of schistosoma japonicum female worms coming from single-sex infections and bisexual infections, J. Proteomics, 2020, 213, 103597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Shi X., Wang X., Cheng F., Cao H., Liang H., Lu J., Kong Q., Bie Z., iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics analysis of cold stress-induced mechanisms in grafted watermelon seedlings, J. Proteomics, 2019, 192, 311–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chen Z., Meng Y., Sheng B., Zhou Z., Jin C., Meng F., Linking exoproteome function and structure to anammox biofilm development, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2019, 53 (3), 1490–1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sluysmans S., Méan I., Xiao T., Boukhatemi A., Ferreira F., Jond L., Mutero A., Chang C. J., Citi S., PLEKHA5, PLEKHA6, and PLEKHA7 bind to PDZD11 to target the menkes ATPase ATP7A to the cell periphery and regulate copper homeostasis, MBoC., 2021, 32 (21), ar34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sluysmans S., Méan I., Jond L., Citi S., WW, PH and C-Terminal domains cooperate to direct the subcellular localizations of PLEKHA5, PLEKHA6 and PLEKHA7, Front. Cell. Dev. Biol., 2021, 9, 729444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kluska A., Kulecka M., Litwin T., Dziezyc K., Balabas A., Piatkowska M., Paziewska A., Dabrowska M., Mikula M., Kaminska D., Wiernicka A., Socha P., Czlonkowska A., Ostrowski J., Whole-exome sequencing identifies novel pathogenic variants across the ATP7B gene and some modifiers of Wilson's disease phenotype, Liver Int., 2019, 39 (1), 177–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Génin E., Feingold J., Clerget-Darpoux F., Identifying modifier genes of monogenic disease: strategies and difficulties, Hum. Genet., 2008, 124 (4), 357–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Guo Y., Long J., He J., Li C. I., Cai Q., Shu X-Ou, Zheng W., Li C., Exome sequencing generates high quality data in non-target regions, BMC Genomics, 2012, 13 (1), 194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kim B. E., Nevitt T., Thiele D. J., Mechanisms for copper acquisition, distribution and regulation, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2008, 4 (3), 176–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kim H., Son H. Y., Bailey S. M., Lee J., Deletion of hepatic Ctr1 reveals its function in copper acquisition and compensatory mechanisms for copper homeostasis, Am. J. Physiol. – Gastrointest. Liver Physiol., 2009, 296 (2), G356–G364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.


Articles from Metallomics: Integrated Biometal Science are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES