Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85154. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85154

CIC::DUX4 Sarcoma With Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) Immunopositivity

John Grove 1, Rana Naous 2,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12208817  PMID: 40599504

Abstract

CIC-rearranged sarcomas are rare, high-grade, undifferentiated, small round cell sarcomas of bone and soft tissue classified by gene fusions involving the CIC gene with other gene partners, most commonly the DUX4 gene. These tumors tend to affect a wide age range, with a predilection for adult males, with the most common anatomical location being the deep soft tissues of the limbs or trunk. CIC-rearranged sarcomas have proven not only to be challenging to diagnose but also to treat due to their high resistance to conventional therapies. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is an immunohistochemical stain that was developed primarily for the diagnosis of melanoma and has been shown to also be expressed in other epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. To date, PRAME immunopositivity has not been reported in CIC-rearranged sarcomas. Here, we report a 51-year-old male with a large gluteal undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma and bilateral lung metastases, whereby RNA sequencing confirmed the tumor as CIC::DUX4 sarcoma. Interestingly, the sarcoma demonstrated very strong PRAME immunohistochemical positivity, a diagnostic finding that has not yet been reported on CIC::DUX4 sarcomas and has potential use as a beneficial tool in the workup of a diagnostically challenging disease.

Keywords: cic, dux4, fusion, prame, sarcoma

Introduction

Capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC)-rearranged sarcomas are undifferentiated, small, round cell sarcomas that are clinically aggressive and demonstrate poor response to chemotherapy [1]. CIC-DUX4 rearranged sarcoma comprises the vast majority (95%) of CIC-rearranged sarcoma cases [2]. The CIC gene encodes a high mobility group box transcription factor that becomes fused to the DUX4 gene and results in a chromosomal translocation including t(4;19)(q35;q13) or t(10;19)(q26;q13) [2,3]. Other CIC-fusion partner genes include FOXO4, LEUTX, NUTM1, and NUTM2A [1]. The age range for CIC-rearranged sarcomas varies widely, with cases reported from ages 6 to 81 years old [4]. The majority of these sarcomas are found in the deep soft tissue of the limbs or trunk, with reported involvement of other sites such as the bone, head and neck, and viscera [1]. CIC-rearranged sarcomas tend to manifest clinically as painful, rapidly growing soft tissue masses, but at times they can be painless and can even go unnoticed until there is metastatic spread [1]. Like most neoplasms, the diagnostic workup of a CIC-rearranged sarcoma begins with morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation of the resected specimen. CIC-rearranged sarcomas are diagnostically challenging, as they are undifferentiated sarcomas with a predominant round cell phenotype that can mimic many other tumors, including Ewing sarcoma. While CIC-rearranged sarcomas tend to be positive for CD99, WT1, ETV4, and DUX4, these stains are fairly nonspecific and are not sensitive enough to be used alone, thus, there remains a need for specialized genetic testing such as RNA sequencing or RT-PCR for confirmatory diagnosis. Given the rarity of these tumors, lack of awareness can be a contributing factor to the diagnostic complexity of CIC-rearranged sarcomas.

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), a marker that was developed primarily for the diagnosis of melanoma, is a nuclear receptor, transcriptional regulator, and a member of the cancer testis antigen family of proteins that regulates cell differentiation, growth, and apoptosis. In the context of melanomas, PRAME has a high sensitivity (>90%) and specificity. However, PRAME has been shown to be positive in tumors other than melanoma, including many epithelial and non-epithelial tumors and a few sarcomas, leading to variable sensitivity and sensitivity in that regard. In the case presented, we call attention to the strong immunopositivity for the PRAME immunostain in CIC::DUX4 sarcoma. Such a novel finding could serve as a useful diagnostic tool to place CIC::DUX4 sarcomas higher on the differential diagnosis in soft tissue tumors and increase the diagnostic rate of this disease [5].

Case presentation

Clinical presentation

A 51-year-old male with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) presented to the hospital for persistent right hip and buttock pain, sciatica, and decreased right lower extremity function. Three months prior, the patient noticed pain and localized swelling in the right buttock after experiencing a ground-level fall.

Imaging studies

Laboratory tests were non-contributory. CT angiography of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a large, irregular, necrotic mass invading the right gluteal muscles and extending through the right sciatic notch measuring 17 x 15 x 13 cm (Figure 1), as well as satellite necrotic masses involving the right greater sciatic notch and right hemipelvis, the largest of which measured 5.1 x 4.7 cm.

Figure 1. CT abdomen.

Figure 1

CT abdomen showing a large, irregular, necrotic right gluteal mass

The imaging study was also positive for focal tumor invasion of the right common iliac vein with an adjacent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and a metastatic necrotic retrocaval lymph node measuring 2.3 cm in the greatest dimension. CT angiography of the chest revealed multiple bilateral metastatic pulmonary nodules, the largest of which measured 2.4 cm (Figure 2).

Figure 2. CT chest.

Figure 2

CT angiography of the chest demonstrating bilateral pulmonary metastases

Histologic findings

An ultrasound-guided biopsy of the right gluteal mass was performed and was predominantly necrotic (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Gluteal mass biopsy.

Figure 3

Gluteal mass biopsy demonstrating a predominantly necrotic sample with no viable tumor cells (H&E; 10x)

Subsequently, the patient underwent a left lower lobe lung wedge resection that contained three separate tumor nodules ranging in size from 0.9 to 2.3 cm. Microscopic evaluation of the lung nodules revealed a similar morphology and consisted of cellular sheets and nests of malignant round cells with a moderate nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio, vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and pale frothy cytoplasm with associated necrosis (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Metastatic CIC::DUX4 sarcoma.

Figure 4

A: Low-power magnification demonstrating the well-circumscribed nodular nature of the tumor metastatic deposit within the lung wedge resection (H&E;2x), B: Higher power magnification of the tumor showing cellular sheets of malignant round cells with a moderate nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio, vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli and pale frothy cytoplasm (H&E, 100x).

The tumor extended through the pleural surface. Immunohistochemical stains were diffusely and strongly positive for PRAME (Figure 5) while WT1 exhibited diffuse weak to moderate staining (Figure 6).

Figure 5. PRAME immunostain.

Figure 5

Low (A) and high (B) power magnification demonstrating diffuse strong staining for PRAME within the tumor cells (2x, 100x).

PRAME: preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma

Figure 6. WT1 immunostain.

Figure 6

Low (A) and high (B) power magnification demonstrating diffuse weak to moderate staining for WT1 within the tumor cells (2x, 100x)

All other immunostains including S100, SOX10, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, desmin, myogenin, MyoD1, and CD45 were negative and non-contributory.

Molecular studies

Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of 161 genes was performed using the institutional Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v5.12 using the Ion Torrent™ NGS platform (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Oncomine studies were negative for DNA mutations, gene fusions, and copy number alterations. Whole transcriptome exome sequencing (RNA Seq) was performed and exhibited CIC::DUX4 gene fusion (5’ CIC breakpoint corresponding to chr19:42799157 and 3’ DUX4 breakpoint corresponding to chr4:191006158).

Discussion

CIC-rearranged sarcomas are undifferentiated, small, round cell sarcomas with high-grade, round cell morphology that harbor genetic fusions involving the CIC gene [1]. While multiple CIC gene fusions have been documented in the medical literature, the vast majority of CIC-rearranged sarcomas harbor the CIC::DUX4 gene fusion.

CIC::DUX4 sarcomas can arise in persons of any age group, but most commonly present in young adults between the ages of 25 and 35, with rare cases being reported in young children and older adults. They tend to affect males slightly more than females [4,6]. These tumors are often localized to the deep soft tissues in the limbs or trunk and vary in clinical presentation, with some masses causing significant pain and disability while other cases being relatively asymptomatic [6]. In our case, the patient had significant pain due to local invasion, resulting in sciatica and diminished lower extremity function.

Morphologically, CIC::DUX4 sarcomas appear undifferentiated and commonly display a population of monomorphic, predominantly round cells. According to the WHO, epithelioid or spindle cell components may be present as well. Due to its high-grade nature, frequent mitoses and necrosis are commonly encountered [2]. CIC::DUX4 sarcomas have a high rate of distant metastases, especially to the lungs, as also seen in the case above [7].

The differential diagnosis for undifferentiated small round cells involving the deep soft tissue is quite broad, with some entities to consider, including round cell sarcomas with EWSR1 fusions, round cell sarcomas with BCOR alterations, and small round cell sarcomas, not otherwise specified (NOS). Round cell sarcomas with EWSR1 fusions include Ewing sarcoma and round cell sarcomas with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions such as EWSR1::NFATC2 and EWSR1::PATZ1 sarcomas. The distinction between CIC-rearranged sarcomas and Ewing sarcoma is important, as they share many similar morphologic characteristics; however, CIC::DUX4 sarcomas have a much poorer prognosis [4]. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies for EWSR1 gene rearrangement or whole transcriptome exome sequencing can help assist in excluding an EWSR1-rearranged sarcoma, round cell sarcomas with BCOR alterations, and small round cell sarcomas, NOS, respectively. CIC::DUX4 sarcomas are diagnostically challenging, mainly due to a lack of awareness and a lack of a specific immunostaining pattern [2]. Immunohistochemical staining for CIC::DUX4 sarcomas is most notably positive for WT1 and CD99 [8]. While WT1 and CD99 staining are sensitive, they are not specific for CIC-rearranged sarcomas. Ewing sarcomas and CIC::DUX4 sarcomas are both CD99 positive; however, Ewing sarcomas tend to have a more distinct, membranous CD99 staining pattern [8]. In this case, the PRAME immunostain showed strong and diffuse nuclear positivity within the tumor (Figure 5). While PRAME was developed to distinguish melanoma from benign nevocytes, recent studies have shown that PRAME can stain numerous types of epithelial and non-epithelial tumors [5], including synovial sarcomas, myxoid liposarcomas, neuroblastomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and a subset of carcinomas. The strong staining in our case underscores a new potential use of the PRAME immunostain as a cost-effective method to effectively screen for CIC::DUX4 sarcomas in the initial workup of an undifferentiated round cell soft tissue sarcoma.

CIC-rearranged sarcomas tend to have a poor prognosis and a high incidence of metastatic disease at the time of presentation [9]. As in our case, the patient was found to have bilateral pulmonary metastases on imaging. A major contributing factor to the poor prognosis is their insensitivity to many chemotherapy regimens [9]. This can be contrasted to Ewing sarcomas, which tend to respond much better to chemotherapy treatment regimens [9].

Conclusions

CIC-rearranged sarcomas are rare soft tissue tumors that are clinically and morphologically aggressive. These tumors tend to present at a high stage and can be difficult to diagnose and treat. Here, we report a case of a 51-year-old male who presented after several months of pain related to a gluteal tumor with distant metastases. The initial workup of this undifferentiated tumor demonstrated strong PRAME immunopositivity in a tumor ultimately deemed to be a CIC::DUX4 sarcoma via whole transcriptome exome sequencing. PRAME positivity in CIC::DUX4 sarcomas has not been documented in the current medical literature; we hope that it will serve as a useful diagnostic tool in the workup of these challenging tumors and may further assist our understanding of their underlying pathogenesis. More cases are needed to further evaluate the utility of the PRAME immunostain in undifferentiated round cell soft tissue sarcomas. 

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Rana Naous, John Grove

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Rana Naous, John Grove

Drafting of the manuscript:  Rana Naous, John Grove

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Rana Naous

Supervision:  Rana Naous

References

  • 1.CIC-rearranged sarcomas: an intriguing entity that may lead the way to the comprehension of more common cancers. Mancarella C, Carrabotta M, Toracchio L, Scotlandi K. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:5411. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.High prevalence of CIC fusion with double-homeobox (DUX4) transcription factors in EWSR1-negative undifferentiated small blue round cell sarcomas. Italiano A, Sung YS, Zhang L, Singer S, Maki RG, Coindre JM, Antonescu CR. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012;51:207–218. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fusion between CIC and DUX4 up-regulates PEA3 family genes in Ewing-like sarcomas with t(4;19)(q35;q13) translocation. Kawamura-Saito M, Yamazaki Y, Kaneko K, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2125–2137. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sarcomas with CIC-rearrangements are a distinct pathologic entity with aggressive outcome. A clinicopathologic and molecular study of 115 cases. Antonescu CR, Owosho AA, Zhang L, et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:941–949. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.PRAME expression in cancer. A systematic immunohistochemical study of >5800 epithelial and nonepithelial tumors. Kaczorowski M, Chłopek M, Kruczak A, Ryś J, Lasota J, Miettinen M. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46:1467–1476. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.CIC-rearranged sarcomas. A study of 20 cases and comparisons with Ewing sarcomas. Yoshida A, Goto K, Kodaira M, et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:313–323. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CIC-DUX4 fusion-positive round-cell sarcomas of soft tissue and bone: a single-institution morphological and molecular analysis of seven cases. Gambarotti M, Benini S, Gamberi G, et al. Histopathology. 2016;69:624–634. doi: 10.1111/his.12985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Round cell sarcoma with CIC-DUX4 gene fusion: discussion of the distinctive cytomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features in the differential diagnosis of round cell tumors. Chebib I, Jo VY. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;124:350–361. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Systemic treatments and outcomes in CIC-rearranged sarcoma: a national multi-centre clinicopathological series and literature review. Connolly EA, Bhadri VA, Wake J, et al. Cancer Med. 2022;11:1805–1816. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES