Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1998 Feb;48(427):963–966.

Preconception care: who needs it, who wants it, and how should it be provided?

M Wallace 1, B Hurwitz 1
PMCID: PMC1409978  PMID: 9624765

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preconception care (PC) aims to identify and reduce a number of modifiable factors that can adversely affect pregnancy outcome. AIM: To ascertain both knowledge of the attitudes towards PC among members of primary health care teams (PHCTs) and registered women of childbearing age in a representative sample of general practices in Harrow. METHOD: A questionnaire survey was conducted in a randomly selected group of nine general practices in the London borough of Harrow. Subjects included all relevant health professionals and female patients of childbearing age registered with the practices. RESULTS: A total of 62/88 (70.5%) health professionals and 811 women (1 in 20 of the entire target population) completed the questionnaires. Nurses' knowledge matched that of the doctors, except in the area of genetics. Over 85% of all health professionals believed that PC could be of benefit to both mother and baby. Women were generally well informed; Asian women, those born outside the UK, those who had never been pregnant, and those who had not undertaken education beyond the age of 18 years were significantly less well informed. Health professionals considered PC to be best delivered opportunistically by nurses, and this method appeared to be acceptable to most female patients of childbearing age, although it was significantly less acceptable among Asians. CONCLUSION: Among health professionals and women of childbearing age, there is generally a good level of knowledge of PC, although certain groups are less well informed than others and could benefit from a targeted education approach. Widespread agreement that PC is worthwhile was found among PHCT members, but this view is less strongly held by the female public, with the acceptability of providing PC opportunistically differing significantly between ethnic groups.

Full text

PDF
963

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bruster S., Jarman B., Bosanquet N., Weston D., Erens R., Delbanco T. L. National survey of hospital patients. BMJ. 1994 Dec 10;309(6968):1542–1546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6968.1542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark N. A., Fisk N. M. Minimal compliance with the Department of Health recommendation for routine folate prophylaxis to prevent fetal neural tube defects. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Aug;101(8):709–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fleissig A. Unintended pregnancies and the use of contraception: changes from 1984 to 1989. BMJ. 1991 Jan 19;302(6769):147–147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6769.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frank P., McNamee R., Hannaford P. C., Kay C. R. Effect of changes in maternal smoking habits in early pregnancy on infant birthweight. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Feb;44(379):57–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Phull E., Hirst S. L. Folic acid in pregnancy. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):688–688. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rothman K. J., Moore L. L., Singer M. R., Nguyen U. S., Mannino S., Milunsky A. Teratogenicity of high vitamin A intake. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 23;333(21):1369–1373. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511233332101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Waterson E. J., Murray-Lyon I. M. Preventing alcohol related birth damage: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(3):349–364. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90190-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wild J., Schorah C. J., Levene M. I. The prevention of neural tube defects in post-partum women. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Feb;47(415):123–123. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wild J., Sutcliffe M., Schorah C. J., Levene M. I. Prevention of neural-tube defects. Lancet. 1997 Jul 5;350(9070):30–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66239-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van der Spuy Z. M., Steer P. J., McCusker M., Steele S. J., Jacobs H. S. Outcome of pregnancy in underweight women after spontaneous and induced ovulation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Apr 2;296(6627):962–965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6627.962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES