Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2023 Apr 11;21(4):e3002052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002052

Genomic surveillance uncovers a pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus

Sergio M Latorre 1,#, Vincent M Were 2,#, Andrew J Foster 2,#, Thorsten Langner 2,#, Angus Malmgren 2, Adeline Harant 2, Soichiro Asuke 3, Sarai Reyes-Avila 2, Dipali Rani Gupta 4, Cassandra Jensen 5, Weibin Ma 2, Nur Uddin Mahmud 4, Md Shabab Mehebub 4, Rabson M Mulenga 6, Abu Naim Md Muzahid 4, Sanjoy Kumar Paul 4, S M Fajle Rabby 4, Abdullah Al Mahbub Rahat 4, Lauren Ryder 2, Ram-Krishna Shrestha 2, Suwilanji Sichilima 6, Darren M Soanes 7, Pawan Kumar Singh 8, Alison R Bentley 8, Diane G O Saunders 5, Yukio Tosa 3, Daniel Croll 9, Kurt H Lamour 10, Tofazzal Islam 4, Batiseba Tembo 6, Joe Win 2,*, Nicholas J Talbot 2,*, Hernán A Burbano 1,*, Sophien Kamoun 2,*
Editor: Joseph Heitman11
PMCID: PMC10089362  PMID: 37040332

Abstract

Wheat, one of the most important food crops, is threatened by a blast disease pandemic. Here, we show that a clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus recently spread to Asia and Africa following two independent introductions from South America. Through a combination of genome analyses and laboratory experiments, we show that the decade-old blast pandemic lineage can be controlled by the Rmg8 disease resistance gene and is sensitive to strobilurin fungicides. However, we also highlight the potential of the pandemic clone to evolve fungicide-insensitive variants and sexually recombine with African lineages. This underscores the urgent need for genomic surveillance to track and mitigate the spread of wheat blast outside of South America and to guide preemptive wheat breeding for blast resistance.


Wheat, the most important food crop, is threatened by a blast disease pandemic. This study uses genome analyses to track the spread of a clonal lineage of the pandemic blast fungus and to reveal its potential to evolve fungicide-insensitive variants and sexually recombine with African lineages.

Introduction

Plant disease outbreaks threaten the world’s food security at alarming levels [1,2]. Understanding pathogen evolution during epidemics is essential for developing a knowledge-based disease management response. Genomic surveillance allows for rapid and precise pathogen identification, tracing of outbreak origin and can guide preventive measures. It therefore adds a unique dimension to coordinated responses to infectious disease outbreaks and is central to the Global Surveillance System (GSS) recently proposed to increase global preparedness to plant health emergencies [3].

In wheat, yield losses caused by pests and diseases average over 20% [4]. Wheat is currently threatened by the expanding blast pandemic caused by the ascomycete fungus Magnaporthe oryzae (Syn. Pyricularia oryzae), a formidable and persistent menace to major grain cereals that could contribute to total crop failure [5]. The disease first appeared in 1985 in Brazil but has been reported in Bangladesh and Zambia over the last years, causing, for example, an average yield loss of 51% in the Bangladesh outbreak in 2016 [6]. The occurrence of wheat blast on three continents with climatic conditions highly conducive to its spread, is unprecedented and represents a very significant threat to global food security which is exacerbated by the unprecedented twin challenge of climate change [7] and armed conflicts [8] in major agricultural regions.

Wheat blast emerged in Brazil in 1985 following the wide-spread deployment of wheat genotypes carrying the RWT4 resistance gene but lacking RWT3 (RWT4+/RWT3-). These two resistance genes recognize the blast effectors PWT3 and PWT4, respectively. Thus, the deployment of RWT4+/RWT3- varieties facilitated host jumps of M. oryzae isolates carrying PWT3, but not PWT4 effectors from ryegrass (Lolium spp.) to wheat, which was followed by loss of function mutations in the PWT3 effector and subsequent spread to common wheat varieties [9]. An aggressive lineage of the wheat blast fungus that first emerged in Bangladesh in 2016 was previously traced to the genetically diverse South American population [10]. However, the genetic identity and origin of the causal agent of an African outbreak, first detected in Zambia in 2018, remains unknown [11].

Here, we show that the recent emergence of wheat blast in Asia and Africa was caused by a single clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus closely related to South American isolates and that the outbreaks in Zambia and Bangladesh originated by independent introductions. Through rapid genome analyses, we revealed that the disease resistance gene Rmg8 as well as strobilurin fungicides are effective against isolates of the pandemic clonal lineage and confirmed our predictions in laboratory experiments. However, the pandemic lineage has the capacity to develop fungicide resistance and can mate with local finger millet (Eleusine coracana) blast fungus, highlighting the evolutionary potential of the African outbreak to cause further damage to wheat production across the continent. Our results demonstrate that genomics can rapidly identify emerging pathogen genotypes to guide disease management and counteract emerging pathogen lineages. These findings will inform management strategies for this devastating wheat disease and warrant further genomic surveillance to prevent and manage future outbreaks.

Results and discussion

To determine the relationship between African wheat blast isolates from Zambia with populations from South America and Bangladesh, we selected 84 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mined from the sequence data of Islam and colleagues [10] to discriminate between the Bangladesh lineage from other M. oryzae genotypes. We genotyped 537 M. oryzae samples from different geographical regions and hosts based on multiplex amplicon sequencing (MonsterPlex; see Material and methods) (N = 237) and publicly available genomes (N = 351) (Figs 1 and S1 and S1 Table). Using the set of isolates from which we genotyped the 84 SNPs and also sequence their whole genomes, we showed that the set of 84 Monsterplex SNPs accurately reflects the patterns of genome-wide diversity and host specificity of the blast fungus (S2 Fig). The Zambian isolates (N = 13, 2018 to 2020) are identical for the 84 SNPs to wheat blast isolates from Bangladesh (N = 71, 2016 to 2020) and one genotype B71 from South America (Bolivia, N = 1, 2012). We conclude that this “B71 lineage,” which emerged in Asia in 2016 and traces its origins to South America, is now established in Zambia.

Fig 1. The emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh and Zambia was caused by the B71 genetic lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae.

Fig 1

(A) Neighbor-joining tree of 537 worldwide distributed M. oryzae isolates based on 84 concatenated SNPs obtained by multiplex amplicon sequence and/or genome sequences. The topology corresponds to the optimal tree drawn from 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Isolates that belong to the B71 lineage are shown with orange (13 Zambian isolates) and red (71 Bangladeshi isolates and the Bolivian B71) background shades. (B) Geographical distribution of M. oryzae samples used in the tree. The colored points represent the approximate geographical origin of the isolates. Colors in (A) and (B) correspond to the plant host organism (upper inset). The base map was created with the R package rworldmap v.1.3.4 (data from: Natural Earth data v.1.4.0). (C) Distribution of the collection year of M. oryzae wheat-infecting isolates used in the phylogenetic analysis. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238. SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

We prioritized samples for whole-genome sequencing based on our genotyping analyses and combined the samples with existing datasets to generate a set of 71 whole-genome sequences of M. oryzae wheat isolates (Triticum lineage) from South America (N = 37), Asia (N = 21), and Africa (N = 13) (S2 Table). To gain insight into the phylogenetic relationship of the B71 lineage to other wheat isolates, we first performed unsupervised clustering of the 71 genomes using principal component analysis (PCA) based on pairwise Hamming distances (Fig 2A) and hierarchical clustering based on f3-outgroup statistics (S3 Fig). The B71 lineage shows reduced genetic diversity in comparison with South American isolates although incipient sub-structuring can be noted between Zambian and Bangladeshi clusters (Fig 2A, inset).

Fig 2. Wheat blast outbreaks in Zambia and Bangladesh originated by independent introductions of the recently emerged B71 clonal lineage.

Fig 2

(A) The B71 lineage shows reduced genetic diversity in comparison with South American wheat-infecting isolates. PCA was performed based on genome-wide pairwise Hamming distances of 71 isolates from South America, Asia, and Africa. The colors of the points indicate the provenance of each isolate (see inset). The circular shaded area indicates isolates from the Brazilian cluster (PY0925) that is the closest to the B71 cluster. Axes labels indicate the percentage of total variation explained by each PC. The magnified area shows isolates that are part of the B71 lineage. (B) The B71 cluster is a clonal lineage. The scatter plots show pairwise LD (measured as r2) between SNPs that are at most two megabases apart. The red solid line in the South American cluster represents a fitted exponential decay model using nonlinear least squares. The histograms display LD expressed as D’ for genome-wide SNPs. The points and bars are colored as indicated in the inset. (C) The B71 clonal lineage has recently expanded with independent introductions in Zambia and Bangladesh. The scatter plot shows the linear regression (dotted line) of root-to-tip patristic distances (y-axis) versus collection dates (x-axis) for the isolates of the B71 clonal lineage. Maximum likelihood tip-calibrated time tree of the B71 cluster isolates (the PY0925 cluster was used as an outgroup). The horizontal gray and green bars indicate 95% CI for divergence dates (in calendar years) calculated using BacDating and BEAST2, respectively. The points and isolate names are colored as indicated in the inset. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238. CI, confidence interval; LD, linkage disequilibrium; PCA, principal component analysis; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

We decided to test the hypothesis that the B71 cluster is a clonal lineage and challenged it by measuring pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) (Figs 2B and S4). Unlike the South American population, the B71 cluster displays no patterns of LD decay, which is consistent with clonality [12,13] (Figs 2B and S4S6).

We performed phylogenetic analyses to further define the genetic structure of the B71 clonal lineage. Owing to the much finer resolution obtained with genome-wide variation, we found that the Zambian and Bangladesh isolates clustered in separate well-supported clades with distinct phylogenetic affinities to South American isolates (Fig 2C). We conclude that the clonal lineage has spread to Asia and Africa through at least two independent introductions, most probably from South America, although we cannot totally rule out that the source population was located in an unsampled location outside of South America. These findings are consistent with the conclusions of a recent independent study [14].

We leveraged the collection dates of M. oryzae clonal isolates to estimate their evolutionary rate. Before performing the tip-calibration analyses [15], we removed regions that disrupt the clonal pattern of inheritance (S7S9 Figs) [16] and tested for a correlation between genetic distances and collection years (S10 Fig). We obtained rates ranging from 2.74 × 10−7 to 7.59 × 10−7 substitutions/site/year (S3 Table), which were robust to the choice of both substitution and clock models (S4 Table). Although these rates are approximately 9 times faster than previously calculated rates for the rice blast fungus [1719], it is expected that evolutionary rates calculated from disease outbreaks, such as the cases in Bangladesh and Zambia, are likely faster due to incomplete purifying selection [20,21], and rates might vary in different blast fungus host-specific lineages. Using these rates, we dated the emergence of the Asian and African sub-lineage to similar periods (2009 to 2012 and 2010 to 2015, respectively) (Figs 2C and S11). The B71 clonal lineage itself dates back to a few years earlier and probably emerged in South America around 2002 to 2011, before spreading to other continents (Figs 2C and S11).

Can rapid genomic analyses inform practical disease management strategies of the wheat blast pandemic? Plant pathogens use secreted effector proteins to infect their hosts, but these effectors can also trigger plant immunity through an “avirulence” activity. The genome sequences of pandemic B71 lineage isolates offer the opportunity to identify effectors that can be targeted by the plant immune system. To date, the most predictive avirulence effector to confer wheat blast resistance is AVR-Rmg8 [22,23] that triggers an immune response in wheat carrying the resistance gene Rmg8. We scanned the available genomes and found that AVR-Rmg8 is conserved in all 36 isolates of the B71 clonal lineage even though the other 35 isolates of the Triticum lineage carry four diverse AVR-Rmg8 virulent alleles (eII, eII’, eII”, and eII”‘) that fully or partially evade immunity (Figs 3A and S12) [24]. B71 lineage isolates also lack the PWT4 effector, which is known to suppress AVR-Rmg8-elicited resistance [25].

Fig 3. Rmg8 confers resistance against Zambian wheat blast isolates.

Fig 3

(A) The wheat blast lineage contains 5 AVR-Rmg8 variants. Neighbor-joining tree based on amino acid sequences of all nonredundant AVR-Rmg8 variants of 71 wheat blast lineage isolates (left). Representative isolate IDs are shown for each branch. Schematic representation of polymorphic amino acids in AVR-Rmg8 variants of the wheat blast lineage (center). Virulence phenotype associated with each AVR-Rmg8 variant on Rmg8 containing host plants (right). (B) The resistance gene Rmg8 is effective against wheat blast isolates collected in Zambia. Leaves from two weeks old seedlings of Fielder (-Rmg8, upper panel) and S-165 (+Rmg8, lower panel) wheat cultivars were inoculated with spores from Zambian wheat blast isolates, the rice blast isolate Guy11 (non-adapted, avirulent control), PY6047 (virulent control; AVR-Rmg8 eII”‘-carrier), and BTJP4-16 (avirulent on Rmg8 carrying host plants, AVR-Rmg8 eI carrier). Disease and lesion size 5 days’ post-infection. Photo taken by the authors. (C) Quantification of lesions size (in mm) of 10 leaves and three independent experiments. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

These genome analyses predict that the B71 lineage isolates (AVR-Rmg8 positive, PWT4 negative) cannot infect wheat plants with the matching disease resistance gene Rmg8. To test this, we inoculated 14 B71 lineage isolates from Zambia and Bangladesh on wheat lines with and without the Rmg8 resistance gene (Figs 3B and S13). Unlike a distinct South American isolate, none of these pandemic isolates could infect Rmg8 wheat plants. We conclude that Rmg8 is an effective resistance gene against the pandemic wheat blast lineage and has the potential to mitigate the spread of the disease.

Strobilurin fungicides are commonly used against the blast disease, but resistance is frequent in the South American population of the wheat blast fungus [26]. Genome analyses revealed that of the 71 wheat isolate genomes we examined, 13 carry the strobilurin resistance SNP (G1243C; Glycine to Alanine) in the mitochondrially encoded Cytochrome B (CYTB) gene (Fig 4A). Remarkably, all but one Brazilian isolate (12.1.181) of the 36 B71 lineage genomes carry the G1243C allele and are predicted to be strobilurin sensitive. We tested this by assaying B71 lineage isolates and found that all tested 30 isolates are strobilurin sensitive (Figs 4B and 4C and S14).

Fig 4. Zambian wheat blast isolates are susceptible to strobilurin fungicides but at risk from resistance development and can mate with prevailing finger millet blast isolates.

Fig 4

(A) The tree describes, based on nuclear SNPs, the phylogenetic relationship among wheat-infecting blast isolates belonging to three clonal lineages: B71, PY0925, and P29. The tree was rooted in the midpoint. The colored dots next to each isolate label represent the resistant-type allele of the mitochondrially encoded cyt b gene associated with a susceptible or resistant predicted phenotype as shown in the inset. (B, C) 4 × 106 spores of the Zambian strain ZMW20-14 were exposed to 100 μg ml1 azoxystrobin to obtain an azoxystrobin-resistant strain with the G143A mutation (SR1). This strain, the rice infecting strain Guy11 (G11), and the wheat-infecting strains numbered 1–31, respectively, BTBa-B1, BTBA-B2, BTGS6e, BTGS6f, BTGS6g, BTGS6h, BTGP1-b, BTMP-S13-1, PY6047, BTJP4-1, BTJP4-2, BTJP4-3, BTJP4-5, BTJP4-6, BTJP4-9, BTJP4-11, BTJP4-12, BTJP4-15, BTJP4-16, BTJP4-18, ZMW18-06, ZMW20-07, ZMW18-08, ZMW19-09, ZMW18-10, ZMW18-11, ZMW19-13, ZMW20-14, ZMW20-15, ZMW20-16, and ZMW19-17 were grown for 4 days at 25°C on CM in the absence (A) and presence (B) of azoxystrobin indicating that all the Zambian and Bangladeshi isolates have the “strobilurin susceptible” genotype as anticipated by their CYTB sequences. (D) Zambian isolate ZMW20-7 (MAT-1-2) successfully produced perithecia when crossed with a finger millet blast isolate K1 (MAT-1-1) but (E) ZMW20-7 was unable to produce perithecia when crossed with a finger millet blast isolate T26 of the same mating type (MAT-1-2). Photos taken by the authors. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238. SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

What is the evolutionary potential of the pandemic lineage of the wheat blast fungus? In laboratory experiments, we could readily recover spontaneous strobilurin (azoxystrobin)-resistant mutants of African isolate ZMW20-14 (Fig 4B and 4C) consistent with a high potential for emergence of fungicide resistance in the pandemic clonal lineage.

Multiple genetic lineages of the blast fungus are endemic to Africa causing destructive diseases on finger millet, rice, and other grasses [27,28]. The spread of the B71 clonal lineage to Africa raises the specter of sexual reproduction with endemic blast populations, which would further drive the evolutionary potential of the pandemic fungus. We determined that the pandemic B71 lineage belongs to the MAT1-2 mating type based on the genome sequences (S15 Fig) [29], and therefore, is predicted to mate with MAT1-1 isolates of M. oryzae. We tested and confirmed this prediction by showing that Zambian isolates from the pandemic lineage are fertile with MAT1-1 African finger millet isolates (Fig 4D and 4E and S5 Table).

The decade-old B71 clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus, which spread twice from genetically diverse South American populations, happens to be avirulent on Rmg8 wheat and sensitive to strobilurin fungicides. However, the emergence of variants that are more damaging than the current genotypes is probable within short timescales. This could happen either through mutations or sexual recombination with endemic blast fungus populations. Such variants could have increased virulence and fungicide tolerance, thus adding to the difficulty in managing the wheat blast disease. These findings underscore the need for genomic surveillance to improve tracking and monitoring of the wheat blast fungus on a global scale and identifying variants of concern as soon as they emerge [3].

Deployment of Rmg8 wheat varieties on their own in affected areas is unlikely to provide sustained wheat blast management given that the fungus will probably evolve virulent races through AVR-Rmg8 loss of function mutations or gain of PWT4, an effector that suppresses the resistance conferred by Rmg8 [25]. Rmg8 should therefore be combined with other sources of resistance as previously shown [24,30] to be fully useful in areas with high fungal load and disease pressure. However, it might be judicious in the short term to breed and deploy Rmg8 varieties in high-risk areas such as regions neighboring affected countries. This could serve as a firebreak to alleviate the need for wheat cultivation holidays as implemented in the Indian province of West Bengal, particularly in the face of likely wheat shortages and disruptions to global wheat trade [8,31].

Materials and methods

Selection of SNP panel for multiplex amplicon sequencing

To identify the SNPs that could be used for genotyping of M. oryzae from Bangladesh by multiplex amplicon sequencing (Floodlight Genomics, https://floodlightgenomics.com), we filtered 15,871 SNPs identified in Islam and colleagues (2016) [10] using the following criteria: (i) they had to be polymorphic among wheat blast strains alone to make the markers useful for diagnostics; (ii) the minor allele was >30%; (iii) SNPs were located on long exonic sequences (>1,500 bp without interrupting intron); and (iv) long exons to contain only 2 to 4 SNPs. The last two criteria were to make sure that the assay will focus on SNPs surrounded by well-conserved stretches among wheat blast strains with an aim to reduce amplification failures due to polymorphism in the primer binding sites. The above criteria reduced the available genomic regions to 102 loci. We designed 102 PCR primer pairs to amplify approximately 200 bp amplicon for each gene containing 100 bp flanking regions on each side of the SNP locus for multiplex amplicon sequencing. Trial sequencing runs with these primer pairs resulted in 84 primer pairs that consistently produced amplicons that can be sequenced to identify the correct nucleotides in those SNP loci in Bangladeshi wheat blast isolates [32]. We used these as a panel of 84 SNPs to discriminate between the wheat blast clonal lineage of M. oryzae in Bangladesh from other genotypes. Initial analyses and the use of the 84 SNP panel was reported in [32], and the details of 84 SNPs including gene names and primer sequences along with the dataset for benchmarking are available in Tembo and colleagues (2021) [33].

Phylogenetic placement of Magnaporthe oryzae wheat-infecting isolates from the Zambian wheat blast outbreak (2018 to 2020) using a set 84 SNPs

To establish the genetic makeup and the phylogenetic placement of the wheat-infecting lineage that caused a wheat blast outbreak in Zambia (2018 to 2020), we analyzed a set of 84 SNPs, which were designed to distinguish between the pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) that reached Southeast Asia in 2016 from other M. oryzae genotypes [10]. The dataset included 237 M. oryzae isolates from 13 different grasses that were genotyped using multiplex amplicon sequencing (“MonsterPlex”) [33,34]. MonsterPlex is a highly accurate and cost-effective genotyping method to rapidly genotype field isolates [32,33]. The Monsterplex genotypes were extracted from the genotyping matrices [33,34] as previously described [35]. To complement the MonsterPlex dataset and increase the geographic breadth of M. oryzae isolates, we extracted the 84 SNPs from 351 publicly available M. oryzae genomes. The joint dataset consisted of 537 worldwide distributed M. oryzae isolates (Figs 1 and S1 and S1 Table).

After removing adapters with AdapterRemoval v2 [36], we mapped the Illumina-derived short reads to the M. oryzae B71 reference genome [37] using BWA mem [38]. To identify the genomic location of the 84 diagnostic SNPs in the M. oryzae B71 reference genome, we aligned each diagnostic SNP surrounded by 100 bp surrounding regions to the B71 reference genome using blastn [39]. Afterwards, for each of the per isolate mapped BAM files, we retrieved the genotypes at each of the 84 genomic locations using samtools mpileup [40]. We concatenated all SNPs in a multi-fasta-like file that was used as input for phylogenetic analyses.

We built a Neighbor-Joining tree that includes a total of 537 M. oryzae isolates using the R package phangorn [41]. We displayed a tree topology that corresponds to the optimal tree drawn from 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Figs 1 and S1).

We further estimated the accuracy of the genotyping method by comparing SNP data acquired from 51 isolates using MonsterPlex to the SNPs extracted from matching genome sequences. We found that SNPs from both acquisition methods were identical whenever a SNP call was made (100%, 4,251/4,251 sites). In total, only 33 sites had gaps with missing data from MonsterPlex (0.77%, 33/4,284 sites) (S1 Table).

To show that the set of 84 SNPs are informative, we compared the genetic (Hamming) distances between each pair of blast isolates using the set of 84 SNPs and the genome-wide SNPs. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.82 between the two sets of pairwise distances (S2C Fig). To show that this correlation is robust and much higher than expected by chance, we repeated the calculation of pairwise distances for both datasets (84 SNPs and genome-wide SNPs) randomly subsampling a subset of the isolates (10%) with and without isolate names permutation with 100 repetitions. This analysis revealed a median correlation of pairwise distances of 0.82 and 0.001 for the resampling with permuted distances and sample pairs (S2C Fig). We repeated the analysis using only pairwise distances among wheat-infecting isolates and obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.9 (S2D Fig), which shows that the set of 84 SNPs accurately reflect the genetic diversity of the wheat blast fungus.

Processing of short reads and variant calling

Our phylogenetic analyses based on 84 SNPs (Figs 1 and S1) confirmed our previous analyses, which showed that the emergence of wheat blast in Zambia and Bangladesh was caused by the same pandemic lineage of M. oryzae that traces its origin in South America [32,35,42]. Consequently, from here on, we analyzed a set of 71 wheat-infecting M. oryzae genomes that belong to the wheat-infecting genetic lineage. This set included isolates from South America (N = 37), the outbreak in Bangladesh (2016 to 2018) (N = 21), and isolates from the outbreak in Zambia (2018 to 2020) (N = 13) that were exclusively sequenced for this study [43,44] (S2 Table).

We removed adapters from the short reads from the set of 71 M. oryzae genomes using AdapterRemoval v2 [36]. To avoid reference bias, a common problem in population genetic analysis when comparing genetically similar populations, we mapped the short reads to the rice-infecting 70–15 reference genome [45] using BWA mem2 [46,47] (S2 Table). We used samtools [40] to discard non-mapped reads and sambamba [48] to sort and mark PCR optical duplicates.

As a first step to call variants, we used HaplotypeCaller from GATK [49,50] to generate genomic haplotype calls per individual using the duplicate-marked BAM files as input. Subsequently, we used CombineGVCFs, GenotypeGVCFs, and SelectVariants from GATK [49] to combine the individual genomic VCFs, call genotypes, and filter SNPs, respectively. In order to select high-quality SNPs to be included in our phylogenetic and population genetic analyses, we filtered SNPs using Quality-by-Depth (QD), which is one of the per-SNP summary statistics generated by GATK. Using M. oryzae genomes sequenced by two different sequencing technologies, we have previously shown that QD is the summary statistic that generates the best true positive and true negative rates [19]. Following this approach, using GATK VariantFiltration [49], we kept SNPs with QD values no further away than one standard deviation unit away from the median of the distribution of QD values [19]. Finally, we created a new VCF file keeping only non-missing positions using bcftools [40].

Population structure analyses

To assess the population structure of the 71 M. oryzae isolates, we used genetic distances coupled with dimensionality reduction methods. First, we calculated pairwise Hamming distances using Plink V.1.9 [51]. These distances were used as input for PCA using the function prcomp from the R package stats [52] (Fig 3A). Additionally, we used f3-outgroup statistics [53] to establish the pairwise relatedness between M. oryzae samples (X and Y) after divergence from an outgroup: f3(X, Y; outgroup). We used the rice-infecting M. oryzae 70–15 as an outgroup [45]. We calculated z-scores for every possible pairwise sample comparison included in the f3-statistics test (N = 2,485). Subsequently, we carried out hierarchical clustering using the function hclust from the R package stats [52]. As input, we used a distance matrix generated from the f3-statistics-derived f3 values (S3 Fig).

Distinguishing clonality from outcrossing

To distinguish clonality from outcrossing in the B71 pandemic lineage and other genetic groups identified in our population structure analyses, we used patterns of LD decay. While sexual reproduction (outcrossing) will generate patterns of LD decay that are driven by meiotic recombination, LD is not expected to decay in asexual non-recombining populations, i.e., the whole genome will be in LD. We analyzed LD decay patterns in the B71 lineage, the PY0925 lineage and treated the rest of Brazilians M. oryzae isolates as one group. To compute standard measures of LD, we used VCFtools [54]. Since VCFtools is designed to handle diploid organisms, we transformed the haploid VCF files into “phased double haploid” VCF files. Afterwards, we computed pairwise LD as r2 and Lewontin’s D and D’. To evaluate LD decay, for each of the genetic groups, we calculated the average of each LD measure (r2, Lewontin’s D and D’) in bins of physical genomic distance (Figs 2B and S4). To quantify the significance of LD decay, we fitted an exponential decay model using nonlinear least squares. In order to compare the patterns of LD decay between the clonal lineages and the Brazilian group, we downsample the number of SNPs in the Brazilian group to the number of SNPs segregating in the B71 clonal lineage.

To perform a qualitative comparison between the observed patterns of LD decay with the expectations of LD decay in idealized populations, we performed forward simulations using FFPopSim [55]. We simulated genomes that consisted of 300 equidistant SNPs. We first sought to ascertain the effect of the probability of sexual reproduction per generation on the patterns of linkage disequilibrium decay. Each simulation was carried out for 100 generations keeping the population size, the crossover probability, and the mutation rate constant, but changing the probability of sexual reproduction per generation (0, 10−3, 10−2, 10−1, and 1) (S5 Fig). Additionally, we investigated the effect of the population size on the patterns of LD decay. To this purpose, we simulated genomes that consisted of 200 equidistant SNPs. Each simulation was carried out for 100 generations keeping the crossover probability, the mutation rate, and the probability of sexual reproduction per generation constant, but changing the population size parameter (102, 103, 104, 105) (S6 Fig).

Finally, to detect recombination events in each of the genetic groups, we performed the four-gamete test [56] using RminCutter [57]. To be able to compare the number of violations of the four-gamete test among genetic groups, we normalized the number of violations of the four-gamete test by the number of segregating SNPs per genetic group (S7 Fig).

Phylogenetic analyses, estimation of evolutionary rates, and divergence times

To carry out phylogenetic analyses, we used only the non-recombining genetic groups (clonal lineages) B71 and PY0925 (the latter was used as an outgroup) and included exclusively positions with no-missing data (full information). First, we generated a maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny using RAxML-NG with a GTR+G substitution model and 1,000 bootstrap replicates [58]. Then, we used the best ML tree as input for ClonalFrameML [16], a software that detects putative recombination events and takes those into account in subsequent phylogenetic-based inferences. For every isolate, we calculate the percentage of total SNPs masked by ClonalFrameML (S8 Fig). Additionally, we used pairwise Hamming distances to evaluate the levels of intra- and inter-outbreak genetic variation before and after ClonalFrameML filtering (S9 Fig).

Since the LD decay analyses revealed that the B71 pandemic lineage is a non-recombining clonal lineage, we hypothesized that the SNPs marked as putatively affected by recombination are preferentially located in genomic regions affected by structural variants, e.g., presence/absence variants. Such variants will generate phylogenetic discordances due to differential reference bias among the B71 isolates. To test this hypothesis, we created full-genome alignments of the B71 and the 70–15 reference genomes using Minimap2 [59] and visualized the output with AliTV [60]. Then, we overlapped the visual output with the SNPs putatively affected by recombination that were previously identified by ClonalFrameML (S10 Fig).

To test for the existence of a phylogenetic temporal signal (i.e., a positive correlation between sampling dates and genetic divergence), we used the recombination-corrected tree generated by ClonalFrameML (Fig 2C). Using this tree, and without constraining the terminal branch lengths to their sampling times, we measured tip-to-root patristic distances between all isolates of the B71 clonal lineage and the outgroup clonal lineage PY0925 with the R package ape [61]. We calculated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between root-to-tip distances and sampling dates, and fitted a linear model using them as response and linear predictor, respectively (distances ~ sampling dates) (Fig 2C). We calculated 95% confidence intervals of the correlation signal between root-to-tip distance and collection dates by sampling with replacement and recalculating the correlation coefficient 1,000 times (Figs 2C and S11). Additionally, to demonstrate that the obtained correlation coefficient was higher than expected by chance, we performed 1,000 permutation tests, where the collection dates were randomly assigned to the wheat blast isolates (S11 Fig).

To estimate the evolutionary rate and generate a dated phylogeny, where the divergence dates of all common ancestors are estimated, we used two different approaches. First, we used BactDating, a Bayesian framework that estimates evolutionary rates and divergence times using as an input a precomputed phylogenetic reconstruction [62]. As input for BactDating, we used the recombination-corrected tree generated by ClonalFrameML. The tree was loaded into BactDating using the function loadCFML, which permits the direct use of the output of ClonalFrameML as input for BactDating without the need of correcting for invariant sites (Fig 2C). In our second approach, we used BEAST2, a Bayesian approach, which in contrast to BactDating, co-estimates the evolutionary rate and the phylogenetic reconstruction [63]. From the alignment of the concatenated SNPs, we masked those that ClonalFramML marked as putatively recombining and used the masked alignment as input for the BEAST2 analyses. We carried out a Bayesian tip-dated phylogenetic analyses using the isolates’ collection dates as calibration points. Since, for low sequence divergence (<10%), different substitution models tend to generate very similar sequence distance estimates [64], to simplify the calculation of parameters, we used the HKY substitution model instead of more complex models such as GTR. To reduce the effect of demographic history assumptions, and to calculate the dynamics of the population size through time, we selected a Coalescent Extended Bayesian Skyline approach [65]. The evolutionary rate was co-estimated using a strict clock model and a wide uniform distribution as prior (1E-10 - 1E-3 substitutions/site/year), which permits a broad exploration of the MCMC chains. To test the robustness of our evolutionary rate estimation to changes in substitution and clock models, we repeated the analysis using GTR in combination with a strict clock model and HYK in combination with a random local clock model [66]. To have genome-scaled results, the invariant sites were explicitly consider in the model by adding a “constantSiteWeigths” tag in the XML configuration file. Using the CIPRES Science Gateway [67], we ran four independent MCMC chains, each of which had a length of 20,000,000 with logs every 1,000 iterations. We combined the outputs with the LogCombiner and used TreeAnotator [63,68] to calculate the Maximum Credibility Tree as well as dating and support values for each node (Figs 2C and S12 and S3 and S4 Tables).

Determination of mating types

To assign the mating type for each isolate, we used two approaches. First, we created a fasta file containing the nucleotides codifying for the two mating type loci: MAT1-1-1 (GenBank: BAC65091.1) and MAT1-2-1 (GenBank: BAC65094.1) and used it as a reference genome. Using bwa-mem2 [46,47], we mapped each isolate and used samtools depth [40] to calculate the breadth of coverage for each locus as a proxy for the mating type assignment.

Identification of AVR-Rmg8 effector variants and generation of the Avr-Rmg8 family tree

We used a mapping approach to identify Avr-Rmg8 family members in all 71 wheat blast lineage genomes. We mapped short reads sequencing data of each isolate to the B71 reference genome assembly [37] using BWA mem2 [38] and extracted the consensus sequence of the AVR-Rmg8 locus from the output alignment files using SAMtools v.1.9 and BCFtools v.1.9 [40] for each isolate. This led to the identification of five AVR-Rmg8 variants in 71 sequences.

Generation of the Avr-Rmg8 family tree

To infer the AVR-Rmg8 family tree, we generated a multiple sequence alignment of 108 amino acid sequences of all identified variants using MUSCLE [69]. We then removed pseudogenes and duplicated sequences to generate a nonredundant dataset and generated a maximum-likelihood tree with 1,000 bootstrap replications in MEGA7 [70].

Leaf-drop and spray infection assay

To evaluate the response of Rmg8 against wheat blast isolates from Zambia, we carried out leaf drop and spray inoculations. An Oryza-infecting isolate from French Guyana, Guy11 was used as a negative control as this isolate does not infect wheat, while a Triticum-infecting isolate PY6047 from Brazil was used as a positive control it lacks the virulent allele of AVR-Rmg8 [71]. Another Triticum-infecting Bangladesh isolate BTJP4-16 that carries an avirulent allele of AVR-Rmg8 was also included. Wheat cultivars, S-615 (+Rmg8) and fielder (-Rmg8) were grown for 14 days in 9-cm diameter plastic plant pots or seed trays. Detached leaves from two weeks old seedlings were inoculated with fungal conidial suspension diluted to a final concentration of 1 × 105 conidia mL-1 using drop inoculation method. The inoculated detached leaves were incubated in a growth room at 24°C with a 12 h light period. Alternatively, plants were inoculated by spray infection using an artist’s airbrush (Badger, United States of America) as previously described in [72]. After spray inoculation, the plants were covered in polythene bags and incubated in a negative pressure glasshouse with a 12 h light and dark cycle. Disease severity was scored after 5 to 6 days by evaluating lesion color and count or color and size for spray infection or drop inoculation, respectively. Lesions were classified as small black/brown non-spreading spots for resistant and large gray-spreading for susceptible. Each infection experiment was carried out three times.

Generation of crosses and fertility status analysis

Generation of genetic crosses was carried as previously described in [73]. A subset of Zambian isolates ZMW20_04, ZMW18_06, ZMW20_07, ZMW18_10, ZMW20_15, and ZMW20_16 (MAT-1-2) were tested against two finger millet tester isolates from Tanzania, T15 (MAT-1-1) or T26 (MAT-1-2), one from Kenya K1(MAT-1-1), and one from Ethiopia E12 (MAT-1-1). Two isolates were cultured opposite each other on oatmeal agar plate and incubated at 24°C for 7 to 10 days. The cultures were then transferred to a 20°C incubator until flask-shaped perithecia appeared at the crossing point. A Leica DFC360 FX microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to visualize and image the formation of perithecia.

Isolation of azoxystrobin-resistant Magnaporthe oryzae strains

Isolation of azoxystrobin-resistant Magnaporthe strains was carried out by exposure of spores of the fungus to azoxystrobin at 100 g ml-1. Four million conidia of the Zambian wheat-infecting isolate ZMW20-14 were recovered from CM grown agar cultures and plated on the surface of six 12 cm2 square Minimal medium agar plates (MM; [74]) with azoxystrobin at 100 g ml-1. Plates were incubated for 2 weeks and then overlaid with MM plus 100 μg ml-1 azoxystrobin and grown for a further week. Five colonies were isolated from these plates and colonies were purified by subculture to MM with 100 μg ml-1 azoxystrobin for a further week before genotyping. PCR competent genomic DNA was isolated from a 4 mm2 plug of mycelium from the purified azoxystrobin-resistant colonies (named AZ1-AZ5) with disruption using an automated tissue homogenizer and cell lyser. To extract the mycelial plug, it was placed in 400 l of extraction buffer (1 M KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 5 mM EDTA (pH 8) together with a 5 mm stainless steel bead (Qiagen)) and macerated at 1,200 rpm for 2 min in the Geno/grinder followed by a 10-min centrifugation (17,000 x g) in a bench top centrifuge at room temperature, and 300 l of the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and nucleic acids were precipitated with 300 l of isopropanol followed by a 10-min centrifugation at room temperature at 17,000 x g. Nucleic acid pellets were air dried for 10 min and then resuspended in 50 μl of TE with 50 μg ml-1 RNAse by vortexing and then incubated for 10 min at 37°C, and 1 l of the DNA was used in a 50 l PCR reaction with the enzyme Q5 polymerase (New England Biolabs) and the primers Cytb-f AGTCCTAGTGTAATGGAAGC and Cytb-r ATCTTCAACGTGTTTAGCACC (annealing temperature 61.5°C). Amplicons were sequenced following gel purification in both directions using the same primers used to generate them to score for the presence or absence of the strobilurin resistance conferring mutation [26].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh and Zambia was caused by the B71 genetic lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae.

Neighbor-joining tree of 576 worldwide distributed blast isolates based on 84 concatenated SNPs. The topology corresponds to the optimal tree drawn from 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Names of host organisms are shown together at the tips. Duplicated identifiers without the “_g” suffix, represent data belonging from the same isolate but from the “monsterplex” set of 84 SNPs. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s001.eps (6.8MB, eps)
S2 Fig. The set of 84 Monsterplex SNPs reflects the patterns of genome-wide diversity of the blast fungus.

Neighbor-joining tree of 284 worldwide distributed M. oryzae isolates based on 84 concatenated SNPs (A) or genome-wide SNPs (B). (C) The scatter plot shows genetic distances between each pair of blast isolates using the set of 84 SNPs and the genome-wide SNPs. The boxplots show the correlations of genetic distances between each pair of isolates using the set of 84 SNPs and the genome-wide SNPs. The distributions were generated by randomly subsampling a subset of the isolates (10%) with and without isolate names permutation 100 times. (D) The scatter plot shows pairwise genetic distances including only the wheat-infecting blast isolates for the set of 84 SNPs and the genome-wide SNPs. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s002.eps (8.5MB, eps)
S3 Fig. Genetic clustering of Magnaporthe oryzae identifies isolates from the Bangladesh and Zambian outbreaks as part of the B71 lineage.

The pairwise relatedness between M. oryzae samples (X and Y) was estimated using f3-outgroup statistics of the form f3(X, Y; outgroup), which measures the amount of shared genetic history (genetic drift) between X and Y after the divergence from an outgroup (rice-infecting M. oryzae isolate 70–15). The hierarchical clustering is based on f3-scores resulting from f3-outgroup statistic calculations. Darker colors indicate more shared drift. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s003.eps (626.2KB, eps)
S4 Fig. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) does not decay with physical distance in wheat-infecting blast isolates from the B71 lineage.

The scatter plots show pairwise LD (measured as D) between SNPs that are at most two megabases apart. The solid lines represent fitted linear and exponential decay models as indicated in the inset. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s004.eps (3.8MB, eps)
S5 Fig. Forward simulations indicate that the probability of sexual reproduction per generation determines the extent of LD decay.

The simulated genomes consisted of 300 equidistant SNPs. Each simulation was carried out for 100 generations keeping the population size, crossover probability, and the mutation rate constant, but changing the probability of sexual reproduction per generation (see inset). Dots represent LD (measured as D) as a function of the distance between two loci and thick lines represent the mean value per distance-bin. Points and lines are colored as indicated in the inset. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s005.eps (2.7MB, eps)
S6 Fig. Forward simulations indicate that LD breaks as a function of population size.

The simulated genomes consisted of 200 equidistant SNPs. Each simulation was carried out for 100 generations keeping the crossover probability, the mutation rate, and the probability of sexual reproduction per generation constant, but changing the population size parameter. Dots represent LD (measured as D) as a function of the distance between two loci. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s006.eps (1.3MB, eps)
S7 Fig. ClonalFrameML identifies on average 16% of SNPs/per isolate as putatively recombining.

The dendrogram shows the phylogenetic relationships of Magnaporthe oryzae strains as inferred by RAxML-NG. The dendrogram is schematic, i.e., the branch lengths do not accurately represent phylogenetic distances. The bars show the percentage of SNPs identified as putatively recombining by ClonalFrameML, which were masked in our dating analyses. The bars and isolate names are colored as indicated in the inset. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s007.eps (161.6KB, eps)
S8 Fig. The outbreaks of Bangladesh and Zambia show similar levels of genetic diversity.

The panels show the total number of segregating SNPs in the outbreaks of Zambia, Bangladesh, and the B71 clonal lineage. (A) Total number of segregating SNPs. (B) Total number of SNPs after excluding putatively recombining SNPs identified ClonalFrameML. All groups include 13 isolates that were sampled with replacement 100 times. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s008.eps (118.3KB, eps)
S9 Fig. Putative recombinant regions are likely caused by structural variation.

(A) The upper horizontal track is a representation of the wheat blast B71 reference genome. The bottom horizontal track is a representation of the 70–15 rice blast reference genome. Vertical ticks represent different types of SNPs (dark blue: unmasked SNPs; light blue: partially masked SNPs, i.e., masked in only some samples; and red: SNPs masked in all samples) (inset). Unmasked and partially masked SNPs were included in the phylogenetic analyses, whereas fully masked SNP were excluded from them. Ribbons represent syntenic regions between the rice blast 70–15 genome and the wheat blast B71 reference genomes. The coloring of the ribbons indicates the level of identity (chromatic scale). (B) The bar plot summarizes the proportion of the three SNP categories (inset) per bin of link identity between the B71 and 70–15 reference genomes. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s009.eps (16.1MB, eps)
S10 Fig. The temporal signal of the B71 lineage is robust and significantly bigger than expected by chance.

Boxplots represent the distribution of the Pearson’s r correlation between root-to-tip patristic distances and collection dates of the isolates of the B71 clonal lineage. The left boxplot depicts the distribution of 1,000 instances of sampling with replacement from the original dataset. The right boxplot represents the distribution of 1,000 permutation tests, where collection dates were randomly assigned to wheat blast isolates. Median values are shown within each boxplot. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s010.eps (49.3KB, eps)
S11 Fig. Bayesian tip calibrated phylogenetic tree using individuals belonging to B71 and PY0925 clonal lineages.

Average and HPD 95% confidence intervals are shown in calendar years for nodes leading to the outbreaks or clonal lineage expansions. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s011.eps (374.8KB, eps)
S12 Fig. The pandemic wheat blast lineage contains the avirulent AVR-Rmg8 variant eI.

Neighbor-joining tree based on amino acid sequences of all AVR-Rmg8 variants of the wheat blast lineage reveals diversifying AVR-Rmg8 alleles. Isolate IDs are shown for each branch. Wheat blast isolates of the pandemic B71 lineage are colored. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s012.eps (212.2KB, eps)
S13 Fig. Rmg8 confers resistance against the Zambian wheat blast population.

(A) Leaves from two weeks old seedlings of Fielder (-Rmg8) and (B) S-165 (+Rmg8) wheat cultivars were inoculated with spores from ZMW20_07, ZMW18_10, ZMW20_16, Guy11, PY6047, and BTJP4-16 using a spray infection method. Disease lesions were scored six days’ post-infection. Photo taken by the authors. (C, D) Boxplots show lesion count per 10 cm for two independent experiments. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s013.eps (1.9MB, eps)
S14 Fig. All Zambian and Bangladeshi wheat-infecting blast isolates are susceptible to strobilurin fungicides.

(A) The 70 wheat blast isolates had just two genotypes with respect to the mitochondrially encoded gene CYTB. The GGT to GCT mutation in the CYTB gene results in a substitution at position 143 in the gene product and is known to confer resistance to strobilurin class fungicides. All the Zambian isolates sequenced have the “strobilurin susceptible” genotype. (B) Sequencing of the CYTB partial gene sequence in the azoxystrobin-resistant strain (SR1) indicated a homogenous population of mitochondria with the CytB G143A genotype. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s014.eps (1.8MB, eps)
S15 Fig. Only the MAT 1–2 segregates in the B71 clonal lineage.

The Neighbor-Joining tree describes the phylogenetic relations among wheat-blast–infecting isolates. The mating types are codified as colored circles next to the isolate name (see inset). The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

(EPS)

pbio.3002052.s015.eps (674KB, eps)
S1 Table. Dataset of isolates used in the Monsterplex Analysis.

Isolates with both types of data were used for Quality Control analyses.

(TSV)

pbio.3002052.s016.tsv (19.6KB, tsv)
S2 Table. Dataset of selected wheat-infecting isolates with genome-wide information.

(TSV)

pbio.3002052.s017.tsv (2.2KB, tsv)
S3 Table. Estimated evolutionary rates for wheat-infecting Magnaporthe oryzae lineages measured as substitutions/site/year.

(TSV)

pbio.3002052.s018.tsv (233B, tsv)
S4 Table. Estimated evolutionary rates using BEAST2 for wheat-infecting Magnaporthe oryzae lineages measured as substitutions/site/year, under different substitution and clock models.

(TSV)

pbio.3002052.s019.tsv (399B, tsv)
S5 Table. Mating type crosses and fertility status.

(TSV)

pbio.3002052.s020.tsv (599B, tsv)

Acknowledgments

We thank Aida Andrés, members of her group at UCL and Michael Dannemann for input on data analyses, and Talia Karasov for comments on the manuscript. We also thank Emilie Chanclud, as well as Emerson M. Del Ponte and group for contributions to the genotyping experiments.

Abbreviations

GSS

Global Surveillance System

LD

linkage disequilibrium

ML

maximum likelihood

PCA

principal component analysis

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphism

QD

Quality-by-Depth

Data Availability

Genotyping and whole-genome sequencing data included in this article were released without restrictions as soon as they were produced through the OpenWheatBlast Community (https://zenodo.org/communities/openwheatblast). OpenWheatBlast collects research output datasets on wheat blast and encourages scientists to analyze and share them before formal publication. We list below the preprints that were shared through the OpenWheatBlast community and whose data were analyzed in this publication: - J. P. Ascari, et al. 2021. Multiplex amplicon sequencing dataset for genotyping the wheat blast fungus from the Minas Gerais state of Brazil. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4737375 - D. Croll. 2021. Whole-genome analyses of 286 Magnaporthe oryzae genomes suggest that an independent introduction of a global pandemic lineage is at the origin of the Zambia wheat blast outbreak. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4655959 - C. Jensen, et al. 2019. Rmg8 confers resistance to the Bangladeshi lineage of the wheat blast fungus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2574196 - S. M. Latorre, et al. 2022. A curated set of mating-type assignment for the blast fungus (Magnaporthales). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6369833 - S. M. Latorre & H. A. Burbano. 2021. The emergence of wheat blast in Zambia and Bangladesh was caused by the same genetic lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4619405 - B. Tembo, et al. 2021. Whole genome shotgun sequences of Magnaporthe oryzae wheat blast isolates from Zambia. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4637175 - B. Tembo, et al. 2021. Multiplex amplicon sequencing dataset for genotyping pandemic populations of the wheat blast fungus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4605959 - V. Were, et al. 2021. Genome sequences of sixty Magnaporthe oryzae isolates from multiple host plant species. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4627043 - J. Win, et al. 2021. A pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618522 The datasets and scripts generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Github repository: https://github.com/Burbano-Lab/wheat-clonal-linage under the DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the UK Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grants BBS/E/J/000PR9795 to SK and NJT, BBS/E/J/000PR9796 to NJT, BBS/E/J/000PR9798 to SK and NJT, BB/P023339/1 to NJT, BB/W008157/1 to SK, BB/W008300/1 to HAB, BB/R01356X/1 equipment grant to University College London, the Gatsby Charitable Foundation (https://www.gatsby.org.uk/) to SK and NJT, The Krishi Gobeshona Foundation (KGF) of Bangladesh grants KGF TF50-C/17 and TF 92-FNS/21 to TI, The Leverhulme Trust (Philip Leverhulme Prize) to HAB, Royal Society RSWF\R1\191011 to HAB, and European Research Council BLASTOFF grant 743165 to SK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Fisher MC, Gurr SJ, Cuomo CA, Blehert DS, Jin H, Stukenbrock EH, et al. Threats Posed by the Fungal Kingdom to Humans, Wildlife, and Agriculture. MBio. 2020:11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00449-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ristaino JB, Anderson PK, Bebber DP, Brauman KA, Cunniffe NJ, Fedoroff NV, et al. The persistent threat of emerging plant disease pandemics to global food security. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021:118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022239118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization. Global genomic surveillance strategy for pathogens with pandemic and epidemic potential (Draft). WHO; 2022. –2032. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2021/12/08/default-calendar/who-consultation-on-the-global-genomic-surveillance-strategy-for-pathogens-with-pandemic-and-epidemic-potential. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Savary S, Willocquet L, Pethybridge SJ, Esker P, McRoberts N, Nelson A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3:430–439. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mehrabi Z, Ramankutty N. Synchronized failure of global crop production. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3:780–786. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0862-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Singh PK, Gahtyari NC, Roy C, Roy KK, He X, Tembo B, et al. Wheat Blast: A Disease Spreading by Intercontinental Jumps and Its Management Strategies. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:710707. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.710707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chaloner TM, Gurr SJ, Bebber DP. Plant pathogen infection risk tracks global crop yields under climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11:710–715. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01104-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bentley A. Broken bread—avert global wheat crisis caused by invasion of Ukraine. Nature. 2022;603:551. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00789-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Inoue Y, Vy TTP, Yoshida K, Asano H, Mitsuoka C, Asuke S, et al. Evolution of the wheat blast fungus through functional losses in a host specificity determinant. Science. 2017;357:80–83. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Islam MT, Croll D, Gladieux P, Soanes DM, Persoons A, Bhattacharjee P, et al. Emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh was caused by a South American lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae. BMC Biol. 2016;14:84. doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0309-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tembo B, Mulenga RM, Sichilima S, M’siska KK, Mwale M, Chikoti PC, et al. Detection and characterization of fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum) causing wheat blast disease on rain-fed grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Zambia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0238724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taylor JW, Hann-Soden C, Branco S, Sylvain I, Ellison CE. Clonal reproduction in fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:8901–8908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503159112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Adhikari TB, Knaus BJ, Grünwald NJ, Halterman D, Louws FJ. Inference of Population Genetic Structure and High Linkage Disequilibrium Among Alternaria spp. Collected from Tomato and Potato Using Genotyping by Sequencing. bioRxiv. 2019. p. 827790. doi: 10.1101/827790 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu S, Lin G, Ramachandran SR, Cruppe G, Cook D, Pedley KF, et al. Rapid mini-chromosome divergence among fungal isolates causing wheat blast outbreaks in Bangladesh and Zambia. bioRxiv. 2022. p. 2022.06.18.496690. doi: 10.1101/2022.06.18.496690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rieux A, Balloux F. Inferences from tip-calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:1911–1924. doi: 10.1111/mec.13586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Didelot X, Wilson DJ. ClonalFrameML: efficient inference of recombination in whole bacterial genomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11:e1004041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gladieux P, Ravel S, Rieux A, Cros-Arteil S, Adreit H, Milazzo J, et al. Coexistence of Multiple Endemic and Pandemic Lineages of the Rice Blast Pathogen. MBio. 2018:9. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01806-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Latorre SM, Reyes-Avila CS, Malmgren A, Win J, Kamoun S, Burbano HA. Differential loss of effector genes in three recently expanded pandemic clonal lineages of the rice blast fungus. BMC Biol. 2020;18:88. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00818-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Latorre SM, Langner T, Malmgren A, Win J, Kamoun S, Burbano HA. SNP calling parameters have minimal impact on population structure and divergence time estimates for the rice blast fungus. bioRxiv. 2022. p. 2022.03.06.482794. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.06.482794 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gire SK, Goba A, Andersen KG, Sealfon RSG, Park DJ, Kanneh L, et al. Genomic surveillance elucidates Ebola virus origin and transmission during the 2014 outbreak. Science. 2014;345:1369–1372. doi: 10.1126/science.1259657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Cooper A, Drummond AJ. Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:1561–1568. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anh VL, Anh NT, Tagle AG, Vy TTP, Inoue Y, Takumi S, et al. Rmg8, a New Gene for Resistance to Triticum Isolates of Pyricularia oryzae in Hexaploid Wheat. Phytopathology. 2015;105:1568–1572. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-02-15-0034-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Anh VL, Inoue Y, Asuke S, Vy TTP, Anh NT, Wang S, et al. Rmg8 and Rmg7, wheat genes for resistance to the wheat blast fungus, recognize the same avirulence gene AVR-Rmg8. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:1252–1256. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Horo JT, Asuke S, Vy TTP, Tosa Y. Effectiveness of the Wheat Blast Resistance Gene Rmg8 in Bangladesh Suggested by Distribution of an AVR-Rmg8 Allele in the Pyricularia oryzae Population. Phytopathology. 2020;110:1802–1807. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-20-0073-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Inoue Y, Vy TTP, Tani D, Tosa Y. Suppression of wheat blast resistance by an effector of Pyricularia oryzae is counteracted by a host specificity resistance gene in wheat. New Phytol. 2021;229:488–500. doi: 10.1111/nph.16894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Castroagudín VL, Ceresini PC, de Oliveira SC, Reges JTA, Maciel JLN, Bonato ALV, et al. Resistance to QoI Fungicides Is Widespread in Brazilian Populations of the Wheat Blast Pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Phytopathology. 2015;105:284–294. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-14-0184-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Manyasa EO, Tongoona P, Shanahan P, Githiri S, Ojulong H, Njoroge SMC. Exploiting Genetic Diversity for Blast Disease Resistance Sources in Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana). Plant Health Prog. 2019;20:180–186. doi: 10.1094/PHP-11-18-0068-RS [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Onaga G, Suktrakul W, Wanjiku M, Quibod IL, Entfellner J-BD, Bigirimana J, et al. Magnaporthe oryzae populations in Sub-Saharan Africa are diverse and show signs of local adaptation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. 2020. p. 2020.11.17.377325. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.17.377325 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Latorre SM, Were VM, Langer T, Foster AJ, Win J, Kamoun S, et al. A curated set of mating-type assignment for the blast fungus (Magnaporthales). 2022. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6369833 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang S, Asuke S, Vy TTP, Inoue Y, Chuma I, Win J, et al. A New Resistance Gene in Combination with Rmg8 Confers Strong Resistance Against Triticum Isolates of Pyricularia oryzae in a Common Wheat Landrace. Phytopathology. 2018;108:1299–1306. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-17-0400-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mottaleb KA, Singh PK, Sonder K, Kruseman G, Erenstein O. Averting wheat blast by implementing a “wheat holiday”: In search of alternative crops in West Bengal, India. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0211410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Win J, Malmgren A, Langner T, Kamoun S. A pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus. 2021. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4618522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tembo B, Mahmud NU, Paul SK, Asuke S, Harant A, Langner T, et al. Multiplex amplicon sequencing dataset for genotyping pandemic populations of the wheat blast fungus. 2021. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4605959 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ascari JP, Cazón I, Del Ponte EM, Farman M, Lamour K. Multiplex amplicon sequencing dataset for genotyping the wheat blast fungus from the Minas Gerais state of Brazil. Zenodo. 2021. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4737375 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Latorre SM, Burbano HA. The emergence of wheat blast in Zambia and Bangladesh was caused by the same genetic lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae. 2021. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4619405 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schubert M, Lindgreen S, Orlando L. AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:88. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peng Z, Oliveira-Garcia E, Lin G, Hu Y, Dalby M, Migeon P, et al. Effector gene reshuffling involves dispensable mini-chromosomes in the wheat blast fungus. PLoS Genet. 2019;15:e1008272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021:10. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schliep KP. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:592–593. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Croll D. Whole-genome analyses of 286 Magnaporthe oryzae genomes suggest that an independent introduction of a global pandemic lineage is at the origin of the Zambia wheat blast outbreak. 2021. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4655959 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tembo B, Sichilima S, Mulenga RM, Harant A, Were V, Langner T, et al. Whole genome shotgun sequences of Magnaporthe oryzae wheat blast isolates from Zambia. 2021. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4637175 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Were V, Mwongera DT, Soanes DM, Shrestha R-K, Ryder L, Foster AJ, et al. Genome sequences of sixty Magnaporthe oryzae isolates from multiple host plant species. 2021. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4627043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dean RA, Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Farman ML, Mitchell TK, Orbach MJ, et al. The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Nature. 2005;434:980–986. doi: 10.1038/nature03449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv [q-bio.GN]. 2013. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vasimuddin M, Misra S, Li H, Aluru S. Efficient Architecture-Aware Acceleration of BWA-MEM for Multicore Systems. 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). 2019. p. 314–324. doi: 10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tarasov A, Vilella AJ, Cuppen E, Nijman IJ, Prins P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2032–2034. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011;43:491–498. doi: 10.1038/ng.806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–575. doi: 10.1086/519795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2018. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Raghavan M, Skoglund P, Graf KE, Metspalu M, Albrechtsen A, Moltke I, et al. Upper Palaeolithic Siberian genome reveals dual ancestry of Native Americans. Nature. 2014;505:87–91. doi: 10.1038/nature12736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2156–2158. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zanini F, Neher RA. FFPopSim: an efficient forward simulation package for the evolution of large populations. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3332–3333. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hudson RR, Kaplan NL. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics. 1985;111:147–164. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4029609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.1.147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ross-Ibarra J. RminCutter. 2009. Available from: https://www.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu/faculty/ross-ibarra/code/files/rmin.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable, and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 2019. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li H. Minimap2: fast pairwise alignment for long DNA sequences. arXiv [q-bio.GN]. 2017. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.01492. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ankenbrand MJ, Hohlfeld S, Hackl T, Förster F. AliTV—interactive visualization of whole genome comparisons. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2017;3:e116. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.116 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Paradis E, Schliep K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:526–528. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Didelot X, Croucher NJ, Bentley SD, Harris SR, Wilson DJ. Bayesian inference of ancestral dates on bacterial phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:e134. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C-H, Xie D, et al. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nascimento FF, Dos Reis M, Yang Z. A biologist’s guide to Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1446–1454. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0280-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Shapiro B, Pybus OG. Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:1185–1192. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Drummond AJ, Suchard MA. Bayesian random local clocks, or one rate to rule them all. BMC Biol. 2010;8:114. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Miller M, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. p 11572–8. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ. http://dxdoiorg/101109/GCE. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Drummond AJ, Bouckaert RR. Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis with BEAST. Cambridge University Press; 2015. Available from: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=Nn25CgAAQBAJ. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jensen C, Tosa Y, Tofazzal Islam M, Talbot NJ, Kamoun S, Saunders DGO. Rmg8 confers resistance to the Bangladeshi lineage of the wheat blast fungus. 2019. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2574196 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Hamer JE. Identification and characterization of MPG1, a gene involved in pathogenicity from the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell. 1993;5:1575–1590. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.11.1575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Valent B, Farrall L, Chumley FG. Magnaporthe grisea genes for pathogenicity and virulence identified through a series of backcrosses. Genetics. 1991;127:87–101. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Foster AJ, Jenkinson JM, Talbot NJ. Trehalose synthesis and metabolism are required at different stages of plant infection by Magnaporthe grisea. EMBO J. 2003;22:225–235. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Paula Jauregui, PhD

3 Nov 2022

Dear Dr. Kamoun,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "A pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus" for consideration as a Discovery Report by PLOS Biology.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff, as well as by an academic editor with relevant expertise, and I am writing to let you know that we would like to send your submission out for external peer review.

However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire.

Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. After your manuscript has passed the checks it will be sent out for review. To provide the metadata for your submission, please Login to Editorial Manager (https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology) within two working days, i.e. by Nov 05 2022 11:59PM.

If your manuscript has been previously peer-reviewed at another journal, PLOS Biology is willing to work with those reviews in order to avoid re-starting the process. Submission of the previous reviews is entirely optional and our ability to use them effectively will depend on the willingness of the previous journal to confirm the content of the reports and share the reviewer identities. Please note that we reserve the right to invite additional reviewers if we consider that additional/independent reviewers are needed, although we aim to avoid this as far as possible. In our experience, working with previous reviews does save time.

If you would like us to consider previous reviewer reports, please edit your cover letter to let us know and include the name of the journal where the work was previously considered and the manuscript ID it was given. In addition, please upload a response to the reviews as a 'Prior Peer Review' file type, which should include the reports in full and a point-by-point reply detailing how you have or plan to address the reviewers' concerns.

During the process of completing your manuscript submission, you will be invited to opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. Visit http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/preprints for full details. If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint, please upload a single Preprint PDF.

Feel free to email us at plosbiology@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Paula

---

Paula Jauregui, PhD,

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

pjaureguionieva@plos.org

Decision Letter 1

Paula Jauregui, PhD

21 Dec 2022

Dear Sophien,

Thank you for your patience while your manuscript "A pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus" went through peer-review at PLOS Biology. Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, an Academic Editor with relevant expertise, and by several independent reviewers. I'm handling this paper temporarily while my colleague Dr Paula Jauregui is out of the office.

In light of the reviews, which you will find at the end of this email, we are pleased to offer you the opportunity to address the comments from the reviewers in a revision that we anticipate should not take you very long. We will then assess your revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments with our Academic Editor aiming to avoid further rounds of peer-review, although might need to consult with the reviewers, depending on the nature of the revisions.

IMPORTANT: Please address the following:

a) Please could you change the title to something a bit more declarative? We suggest something like: "Genomic surveillance identifies a pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus"

b) Please attend to the requests from the reviewers.

c) Please ensure that you comply with our Data Policy requests; specifically, we need you to supply the numerical values underlying Figs 1ABC, 2ABC, 3C, 4A, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7AB, S8AB, S9, S10, S11, S12CD, S14 (some of these will be treefiles, I guess, rather than numbers), either as a supplementary data file or as a permanent DOI’d deposition. I note that some of these data may be in your GitHub deposition (https://github.com/Burbano-Lab/wheat-clonal-linage); if so, please clarify, and supply a DOI’d version (e.g. in Zenodo, Figshare, etc.)

d) Please cite the location of the data clearly in all relevant main and supplementary Figure legends, e.g. “The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data” or “The data underlying this Figure can be found in https://doi.org/XXXX”

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 6 weeks. Please email us (plosbiology@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension.

At this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our journal; please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that we withdraw the manuscript.

**IMPORTANT - SUBMITTING YOUR REVISION**

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point-by-point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually.

You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since the original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted " file type.

*Resubmission Checklist*

When you are ready to resubmit your revised manuscript, please refer to this resubmission checklist: https://plos.io/Biology_Checklist

To submit a revised version of your manuscript, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' where you will find your submission record.

Please make sure to read the following important policies and guidelines while preparing your revision:

*Published Peer Review*

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*PLOS Data Policy*

Please note that as a condition of publication PLOS' data policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions arrived at in your manuscript. If you have not already done so, you must include any data used in your manuscript either in appropriate repositories, within the body of the manuscript, or as supporting information (N.B. this includes any numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.). For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

*Blot and Gel Data Policy*

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare them now, if you have not already uploaded them. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive thus far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Roli

Roland Roberts PhD

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

rroberts@plos.org

on behalf of

Paula Jauregui, PhD,

Editor

PLOS Biology

pjaureguionieva@plos.org

----------------------------------------------------------------

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

Reviewer #1:

[identifies themself as Johanna Rhodes]

This paper addresses the threat of wheat blast disease, which threatens global food security, and includes work that I believe is incredibly novel on at the forefront of this field, by combining genomics and laboratory experiments. I only have a few comments that I believe, if addressed, would make this article even stronger.

For the introduction, could you expand on the sentence explaining the importance of the carrying the RWT4 gene, but not RWT3, and how this ties in with the PWT3/4 effectors?

Methods:

Some more clarity on the 84 diagnostic SNPs would be helpful; I looked at the referenced paper in the methods (article 7, "Emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh was caused by a South American lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae"), yet I couldn't see how the 84 SNPs were derived. As such, a brief description describing how the genotypes were extracted, and what these diagnostic 84 SNPs are would be helpful, as at the moment I can't see how they are informative for discriminating between lineages and deriving ancestral origins. It might be that this has been done elsewhere, and hasn't been sufficiently referenced in this paper; but if not, benchmarking how these 84 SNPs are indeed informative in comparison to the whole genome, would aid this part of the paper considerably.

There is mention of missing sites being removed; including missing positions, but labelling them as such, can be informative. Missing positions could be missing due to sequencing/PCR error or removed doing the bioinformatics analysis; this does not mean the position is not there, just that you are not certain it's there to high confidence. Including missing positions, and setting them to missing would be much closer to the biology.

Finally, regarding the temporal analysis using BEAST: whilst HKY is less complex, this might not necessarily be the best fit for your data. A better approach would be to use bModelTest (under different combinations of demographic and clock scenarios) to assess which is the best model to use. The dates of emergence need confidence intervals (in the Results section), and the rates seem very small - how do these compare to other rates in fungi? I think increasing the MCMC chain length for convergence and altering the model/demographic would improve rates and dates.

All in all - this is a very good piece of research, and must represent a huge effort from all involved, and I'd be happy to see this published.

Reviewer #2:

[identifies themself as Ping Wang]

Compared to Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Oryza which causes the devastating rice blast, the M. oryzae pathotype Triticum infects wheat, causing less known but economically important wheat blasts in geologically limited areas. However, due to world trade, the wheat blast has spread to South Asia and South Africa. Studies are urgently needed to monitor the transmission to avoid continued widespread impact on world food supplies. Here, Latorre and colleagues employed SNP analysis to examine the genotypes of various strains collected from the three continents to establish a single clonal linkage of the fungus. They also provided evidence demonstrating that the strains with the similar genetic backgrounds are controllable by host plants harboring the avirulent Rmg8 gene and by the fungicide Strobilurin. This is an excellent written study of significant importance. The conclusions are largely supported by experimental approaches and substantiated by statistical analysis.

I have no additional specific comments other than suggesting that the excellent review article entitled "Intercontinental Jumps and Its Management Strategies" by P. K. Singh and colleagues be included in the References.

Reviewer #3:

Latorre et al. addresses a topic of broad interest and approaches the problem of introductions of potentially devastating crop pathogens from a number of important angles and represents a strong contribution to plant pathology. These angles include phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of a global collection of strains of the wheat blast fungus, genomic analyses of genes conferring virulence and antifungal drug resistance, tests of virulence and drug resistance, and mating ability. My only concern is about the claim of independence for the two introductions and my concern can be addressed by some straightforward additional analyses involving the current dataset and some additional discussion. I have put my comments below quotes from the manuscript, which are preceded by @.

@Wheat, the most important food crop,

Some more information is needed. When I Google crops, rice comes up as the number one food crop.

@ following two independent introductions from South America

It is clear that there were two introductions, one to Bangladesh and one to Zambia, but it is not clear that they were independent. I see these possibilities. 1. One introduction from South America to Bangladesh and one from South America to Zambia. 2: One introduction from South America to Bangladesh and then an introduction from Bangladesh to Zambia. 3: One introduction from South America to Zambia and then an introduction from Zambia to Bangladesh. 4. The involvement of introductions to other, unsampled, regions of the globe. I do not think that you have enough data to settle on #1 and rule out the others. Number 4 is impossible to refute, but you should acknowledge it. Think about early publications on amphibian decline or Cryptococcus gatti that created scenarios to explain introductions that turned out to be wrong. You can determine if you have enough data to distinguish among scenarios numbers 1 - 3 by using trees constrained to reflect the scenarios and using likelihood ratio tests to see if your data are significantly more likely for one of them. My guess is that you won't be able to exclude both numbers 2 and 3. In which case, it would be best to consider the various scenarios and comment on how other data (historical records, etc.) support or refute each scenario.

@cause total crop failure (5)

Are there data on the effect of wheat blast on the production of wheat in Bangladesh or Zambia? Reference 5 is about the synchrony of crop loss and not about wheat blast losses.

@twin challenge of climate change and armed conflicts in major agricultural regions.

Is there a reference for climate change or armed conflict and wheat blast? Or, one about the two problems and agricultural production in general?

@However, the genetic identity and origin of the causal agent of an African outbreak, first detected in Zambia in 2018, remains unknown (8).

The authors cite reference 11 later in their ms regarding recombined regions of the wheat blast genome and this bioRxiv article also addresses the origin of the Zambian isolates. If there were any way to publish both this ms and that of ref. 11 back-to-back, science would be better served. Note that Latorre et al. goes well beyond reference 11 in testing virulence and drug resistance.

@Here, we show that the recent emergence of wheat blast in Asia and Africa was caused by a single clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus closely related to South American isolates and that the outbreaks in Zambia and Bangladesh originated by independent introductions.

See above comment about the independence of the introductions. It is also not clear to me that the introductions need to be single. Couldn't several closely related but genetically different strains have been involved in the introductions?

@The B71 lineage shows reduced genetic diversity in comparison with South American isolates although incipient sub-structuring can be noted between Zambian and Bangladeshi clusters (Fig. 2A, inset).

Figure 7a and 7b show that much of the genetic variation in the Zambian clade may be due to the genome rearrangements and the mini-chromosome. I wonder if the authors have analyzed the amount of genetic variation and the timing of introductions after removing the non-clonal variation? If so, did it alter the story about the timing of introductions? If not, it would be worth doing to see if it does alter the timing.

@The B71 cluster is a clonal lineage.

This claim is solid.

@The B71 clonal lineage has recently expanded with independent introductions in Zambia and Bangladesh.

See comments above.

@These findings are consistent with the conclusions of a recent independent study (11).

The Liu et al. bioRxiv publication advances a good phylogenetic argument for two, independent introductions, because the Bangladesh isolates are on a branch with a Brazilian isolate at the base and the Zambian isolates are on a branch subtended by a Bolivian isolate. Again, likelihood ratio tests would show if there are enough data to support this scenario over the others.

@we removed regions that disrupt the clonal pattern of inheritance (Fig. S6-S8)

More explanation is needed here. Having just told the reader that the spread is clonal, you need to let the reader know how there can be non-clonal elements in the genome. Figure S7 needs to be described in more detail. This figure also provides an argument in favor of independent introduction because the Zambian isolates and the Bolivian isolate seem to share a mini-chromosome that is absent in the Brazilian and Bangladeshian isolates. This point is also made in the Liu et al. bioRxiv article.

@We scanned the available genomes and found that AVR-Rmg8 is conserved in all 36 isolates of the B71 clonal lineage even though the other 35 isolates of the Triticum lineage carry four diverse AVR-Rmg8

virulent alleles (eII, eII', eII'', eII''') that fully or partially evade immunity (Fig. 3A; Fig. S11) (16). B71 lineage isolates also lack the PWT4 effector, which is known to suppress AVR-Rmg8-elicited resistance

(17).

This section of the ms is solid.

@These genome analyses predict that the B71 lineage isolates (AVR-Rmg8 positive, PWT4 negative) cannot infect wheat plants with the matching disease resistance gene Rmg8. To test this, we inoculated 14

B71 lineage isolates from Zambia and Bangladesh on wheat lines with and without the Rmg8 resistance gene (Fig. 3B; Fig. S12). Unlike a distinct South American isolate, none of these pandemic isolates could

infect Rmg8 wheat plants.

This section of the ms is solid.

@Remarkably, all but one Brazilian isolate (12.1.181) of the 36 B71 lineage genomes carry the G1243C allele and are predicted to be strobilurin sensitive. We tested this by assaying B71 lineage isolates and

found that all tested 30 isolates are strobilurin sensitive (Fig. 4B-C; Fig. S13).

From the legend to Figure 4b-c, it seems that only the Zambian isolates were tested for antifungal resistance. If strain 12.1.181 has the genome of a strobilurin resistant strain, and it is basal to the Bangladesh clade, are all Bangladesh strains resistant? How did susceptible strains emerge from a population of resistant strains? This point raised the possibility of other populations of wheat blast in other global locations. Note in Figure 4b that there is some phylogenetic distance between the Bangladesh or Zambia populations and their closest South American relative.

All data appear to be available to the scientific community.

Decision Letter 2

Paula Jauregui, PhD

24 Feb 2023

Dear Dr Kamoun,

Thank you for the submission of your revised Discovery Report "Genomic surveillance uncovers a pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus" for publication in PLOS Biology. On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Joseph Heitman, I am pleased to say that we can in principle accept your manuscript for publication, provided you address any remaining formatting and reporting issues. These will be detailed in an email you should receive within 2-3 business days from our colleagues in the journal operations team; no action is required from you until then. Please note that we will not be able to formally accept your manuscript and schedule it for publication until you have completed any requested changes.

Please take a minute to log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production process.

PRESS

We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have previously opted in to the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may opt out on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for choosing PLOS Biology for publication and supporting Open Access publishing. We look forward to publishing your study. 

Sincerely, 

Paula

---

Paula Jauregui, PhD,

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

pjaureguionieva@plos.org

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. The emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh and Zambia was caused by the B71 genetic lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae.

    Neighbor-joining tree of 576 worldwide distributed blast isolates based on 84 concatenated SNPs. The topology corresponds to the optimal tree drawn from 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Names of host organisms are shown together at the tips. Duplicated identifiers without the “_g” suffix, represent data belonging from the same isolate but from the “monsterplex” set of 84 SNPs. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s001.eps (6.8MB, eps)
    S2 Fig. The set of 84 Monsterplex SNPs reflects the patterns of genome-wide diversity of the blast fungus.

    Neighbor-joining tree of 284 worldwide distributed M. oryzae isolates based on 84 concatenated SNPs (A) or genome-wide SNPs (B). (C) The scatter plot shows genetic distances between each pair of blast isolates using the set of 84 SNPs and the genome-wide SNPs. The boxplots show the correlations of genetic distances between each pair of isolates using the set of 84 SNPs and the genome-wide SNPs. The distributions were generated by randomly subsampling a subset of the isolates (10%) with and without isolate names permutation 100 times. (D) The scatter plot shows pairwise genetic distances including only the wheat-infecting blast isolates for the set of 84 SNPs and the genome-wide SNPs. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s002.eps (8.5MB, eps)
    S3 Fig. Genetic clustering of Magnaporthe oryzae identifies isolates from the Bangladesh and Zambian outbreaks as part of the B71 lineage.

    The pairwise relatedness between M. oryzae samples (X and Y) was estimated using f3-outgroup statistics of the form f3(X, Y; outgroup), which measures the amount of shared genetic history (genetic drift) between X and Y after the divergence from an outgroup (rice-infecting M. oryzae isolate 70–15). The hierarchical clustering is based on f3-scores resulting from f3-outgroup statistic calculations. Darker colors indicate more shared drift. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s003.eps (626.2KB, eps)
    S4 Fig. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) does not decay with physical distance in wheat-infecting blast isolates from the B71 lineage.

    The scatter plots show pairwise LD (measured as D) between SNPs that are at most two megabases apart. The solid lines represent fitted linear and exponential decay models as indicated in the inset. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s004.eps (3.8MB, eps)
    S5 Fig. Forward simulations indicate that the probability of sexual reproduction per generation determines the extent of LD decay.

    The simulated genomes consisted of 300 equidistant SNPs. Each simulation was carried out for 100 generations keeping the population size, crossover probability, and the mutation rate constant, but changing the probability of sexual reproduction per generation (see inset). Dots represent LD (measured as D) as a function of the distance between two loci and thick lines represent the mean value per distance-bin. Points and lines are colored as indicated in the inset. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s005.eps (2.7MB, eps)
    S6 Fig. Forward simulations indicate that LD breaks as a function of population size.

    The simulated genomes consisted of 200 equidistant SNPs. Each simulation was carried out for 100 generations keeping the crossover probability, the mutation rate, and the probability of sexual reproduction per generation constant, but changing the population size parameter. Dots represent LD (measured as D) as a function of the distance between two loci. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s006.eps (1.3MB, eps)
    S7 Fig. ClonalFrameML identifies on average 16% of SNPs/per isolate as putatively recombining.

    The dendrogram shows the phylogenetic relationships of Magnaporthe oryzae strains as inferred by RAxML-NG. The dendrogram is schematic, i.e., the branch lengths do not accurately represent phylogenetic distances. The bars show the percentage of SNPs identified as putatively recombining by ClonalFrameML, which were masked in our dating analyses. The bars and isolate names are colored as indicated in the inset. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s007.eps (161.6KB, eps)
    S8 Fig. The outbreaks of Bangladesh and Zambia show similar levels of genetic diversity.

    The panels show the total number of segregating SNPs in the outbreaks of Zambia, Bangladesh, and the B71 clonal lineage. (A) Total number of segregating SNPs. (B) Total number of SNPs after excluding putatively recombining SNPs identified ClonalFrameML. All groups include 13 isolates that were sampled with replacement 100 times. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s008.eps (118.3KB, eps)
    S9 Fig. Putative recombinant regions are likely caused by structural variation.

    (A) The upper horizontal track is a representation of the wheat blast B71 reference genome. The bottom horizontal track is a representation of the 70–15 rice blast reference genome. Vertical ticks represent different types of SNPs (dark blue: unmasked SNPs; light blue: partially masked SNPs, i.e., masked in only some samples; and red: SNPs masked in all samples) (inset). Unmasked and partially masked SNPs were included in the phylogenetic analyses, whereas fully masked SNP were excluded from them. Ribbons represent syntenic regions between the rice blast 70–15 genome and the wheat blast B71 reference genomes. The coloring of the ribbons indicates the level of identity (chromatic scale). (B) The bar plot summarizes the proportion of the three SNP categories (inset) per bin of link identity between the B71 and 70–15 reference genomes. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s009.eps (16.1MB, eps)
    S10 Fig. The temporal signal of the B71 lineage is robust and significantly bigger than expected by chance.

    Boxplots represent the distribution of the Pearson’s r correlation between root-to-tip patristic distances and collection dates of the isolates of the B71 clonal lineage. The left boxplot depicts the distribution of 1,000 instances of sampling with replacement from the original dataset. The right boxplot represents the distribution of 1,000 permutation tests, where collection dates were randomly assigned to wheat blast isolates. Median values are shown within each boxplot. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s010.eps (49.3KB, eps)
    S11 Fig. Bayesian tip calibrated phylogenetic tree using individuals belonging to B71 and PY0925 clonal lineages.

    Average and HPD 95% confidence intervals are shown in calendar years for nodes leading to the outbreaks or clonal lineage expansions. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s011.eps (374.8KB, eps)
    S12 Fig. The pandemic wheat blast lineage contains the avirulent AVR-Rmg8 variant eI.

    Neighbor-joining tree based on amino acid sequences of all AVR-Rmg8 variants of the wheat blast lineage reveals diversifying AVR-Rmg8 alleles. Isolate IDs are shown for each branch. Wheat blast isolates of the pandemic B71 lineage are colored. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s012.eps (212.2KB, eps)
    S13 Fig. Rmg8 confers resistance against the Zambian wheat blast population.

    (A) Leaves from two weeks old seedlings of Fielder (-Rmg8) and (B) S-165 (+Rmg8) wheat cultivars were inoculated with spores from ZMW20_07, ZMW18_10, ZMW20_16, Guy11, PY6047, and BTJP4-16 using a spray infection method. Disease lesions were scored six days’ post-infection. Photo taken by the authors. (C, D) Boxplots show lesion count per 10 cm for two independent experiments. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s013.eps (1.9MB, eps)
    S14 Fig. All Zambian and Bangladeshi wheat-infecting blast isolates are susceptible to strobilurin fungicides.

    (A) The 70 wheat blast isolates had just two genotypes with respect to the mitochondrially encoded gene CYTB. The GGT to GCT mutation in the CYTB gene results in a substitution at position 143 in the gene product and is known to confer resistance to strobilurin class fungicides. All the Zambian isolates sequenced have the “strobilurin susceptible” genotype. (B) Sequencing of the CYTB partial gene sequence in the azoxystrobin-resistant strain (SR1) indicated a homogenous population of mitochondria with the CytB G143A genotype. The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s014.eps (1.8MB, eps)
    S15 Fig. Only the MAT 1–2 segregates in the B71 clonal lineage.

    The Neighbor-Joining tree describes the phylogenetic relations among wheat-blast–infecting isolates. The mating types are codified as colored circles next to the isolate name (see inset). The data underlying this figure can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.

    (EPS)

    pbio.3002052.s015.eps (674KB, eps)
    S1 Table. Dataset of isolates used in the Monsterplex Analysis.

    Isolates with both types of data were used for Quality Control analyses.

    (TSV)

    pbio.3002052.s016.tsv (19.6KB, tsv)
    S2 Table. Dataset of selected wheat-infecting isolates with genome-wide information.

    (TSV)

    pbio.3002052.s017.tsv (2.2KB, tsv)
    S3 Table. Estimated evolutionary rates for wheat-infecting Magnaporthe oryzae lineages measured as substitutions/site/year.

    (TSV)

    pbio.3002052.s018.tsv (233B, tsv)
    S4 Table. Estimated evolutionary rates using BEAST2 for wheat-infecting Magnaporthe oryzae lineages measured as substitutions/site/year, under different substitution and clock models.

    (TSV)

    pbio.3002052.s019.tsv (399B, tsv)
    S5 Table. Mating type crosses and fertility status.

    (TSV)

    pbio.3002052.s020.tsv (599B, tsv)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Editor_and_Reviewers.pdf

    pbio.3002052.s021.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    Genotyping and whole-genome sequencing data included in this article were released without restrictions as soon as they were produced through the OpenWheatBlast Community (https://zenodo.org/communities/openwheatblast). OpenWheatBlast collects research output datasets on wheat blast and encourages scientists to analyze and share them before formal publication. We list below the preprints that were shared through the OpenWheatBlast community and whose data were analyzed in this publication: - J. P. Ascari, et al. 2021. Multiplex amplicon sequencing dataset for genotyping the wheat blast fungus from the Minas Gerais state of Brazil. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4737375 - D. Croll. 2021. Whole-genome analyses of 286 Magnaporthe oryzae genomes suggest that an independent introduction of a global pandemic lineage is at the origin of the Zambia wheat blast outbreak. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4655959 - C. Jensen, et al. 2019. Rmg8 confers resistance to the Bangladeshi lineage of the wheat blast fungus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2574196 - S. M. Latorre, et al. 2022. A curated set of mating-type assignment for the blast fungus (Magnaporthales). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6369833 - S. M. Latorre & H. A. Burbano. 2021. The emergence of wheat blast in Zambia and Bangladesh was caused by the same genetic lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4619405 - B. Tembo, et al. 2021. Whole genome shotgun sequences of Magnaporthe oryzae wheat blast isolates from Zambia. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4637175 - B. Tembo, et al. 2021. Multiplex amplicon sequencing dataset for genotyping pandemic populations of the wheat blast fungus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4605959 - V. Were, et al. 2021. Genome sequences of sixty Magnaporthe oryzae isolates from multiple host plant species. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4627043 - J. Win, et al. 2021. A pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618522 The datasets and scripts generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Github repository: https://github.com/Burbano-Lab/wheat-clonal-linage under the DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7590238.


    Articles from PLOS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES