Skip to main content
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology logoLink to Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
. 2023 Apr 1;27(4):179–184. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.2865

Literature Overview of Association Between Preeclampsia and Cardiovascular Risk

Qian Yang 1,#, Ke Han 2,#, Jing Wang 3, Yulin Zou 3,4,
PMCID: PMC10098376  PMID: 36995054

Abstract

Around 5%-10% of fetal pregnancies impacting maternal and neonatal outcomes have been affected by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. As a cardiovascular risk factor, pre-eclampsia is now really recognized for women throughout the world. Pre-eclampsia is one hypertensive disorder in pregnancy. It imposes far-reaching influences on women and poses a great threat to life as well, no matter mother or child. Around 2% to 8% of pregnancies worldwide are affected by it. It also gives rise to marked maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The occurrence of cardiovascular diseases is the most severe complication observed in preeclamptic women. As clearly revealed by the newest evidence, remarkable association exists between cardiovascular disease and pre-eclampsia. The aim of our review is to highlight the correlation between pre-eclampsia and the possibility of cardiovascular disease. Moreover, it still cannot establish a clear dependency mechanism between pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease for their multifactorial nature.

Keywords: Cardiovascular risk, gestational hypertension, gestational physiology, heart rate, preeclampsia


HIGHLIGHTS

  • We need to concentrate on disease prevention by a yet population-specific and holistic approach to eventually yield measurable data.

  • As forcefully demonstrated by the newest evidence, striking correlation exists between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and pre-eclampsia (PE).

  • The evidence distinctly reveals that PE is a significant risk factor for future CVD, and the challenge will influence future maternal, as well as offspring.

Introduction

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is one of the most crucial problems in obstetrics; it affects 2%-8% of pregnancies worldwide in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO).1 It is a principal cause for maternal morbidity and mortality across the planet.

Pre-eclampsia affects multiple organ systems and is a complex disease process originating at the maternal–fetal interface.2,3 Pre-eclampsia, characteristic signs of proteinuria and hypertension, usually presents after 20 weeks’ gestation. Clinical symptoms include blurred vision, nausea, epigastric pain, headache, and vomiting. Laboratory investigations show elevated serum creatinine, thrombocytopenia, and abnormal liver function tests, especially heightened liver enzymes.4 Pre-eclampsia is defined as an onset of hypertension after 20 weeks gestation (diastolic blood pressure higher than 90 mm Hg on 2 occasions that are 4-6 hours apart or systolic blood pressure higher than 140 mm Hg).5 Notwithstanding the fact that the women will resolve the proteinuria and hypertension after pregnancy, women who develop PE are at increased risk of vascular diseases. Enough evidence proved that women who develop PE are at heightened risk of other vascular diseases. The American Heart Association has given rise to PE being recognized as a female-specific, cardiovascular risk factor.6

Pregnancy is called a maternal stress test. Meanwhile, in a woman’s susceptibility to future cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), the development of obstetric complications conducts a potential role. Cardiovascular diseases and the etiologic pathways of pregnancy complications might also be linked.7 The current guidelines elevated the significance of these associations; a pregnancy history has been recommended as a part of the routine evaluation of cardiovascular risk.8,9

Our review is intended to probe deep into the correlation between PE and the possibility of CVD in pregnant woman.

Pre-eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disease. Pre-eclampsia is defined as new-onset end-organ damage and new-onset hypertension after 20 weeks’ gestation. The complex process pathophysiology exerts profound imposes far-reaching influences on multiple organ systems (Table 1).

Table 1.

Diagnostic Criteria for Preeclampsia

Always necessary Hypertension
  • SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg on 2 occasions at least 4 h apart after 20 weeks’ gestation in a woman with previously normal BP

  • SBP ≥ 160 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 110 mm Hg on 1 occasion

And one of the following Proteinuria
  • ≥300 mg per 24 h urine collection (or extrapolated from timed collection), or

  • Protein/creatinine ratio of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL, or

  • Dipstick reading of 2 + (used only when other methods are not available)

OR any one of the following (in the absence of proteinuria) Thrombocytopenia
  • Platelet count < 100 000/mm3

Renal insufficiency
  • Serum creatinine concentration > 1.1 mg/dL or a doubling of serum creatinine concentration in the absence of other renal disease

Impaired liver function
  • Elevated concentration of liver transaminases to 2×normal

  • Severe persistent right upper quadrant or epigastric pain unresponsive to medication

Pulmonary edema
  • Diagnosed by physical examination or chest x-ray

Neurological signs
  • New-onset headache unresponsive to medication and not accounted for by alternative diagnoses or visual symptoms

  • Visual disturbances

Fetal growth restriction
  • Estimated fetal weight < 10th percentile

BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Abnormal trophoblast invasion is the feature of PE’s clinical syndrome, long before clinical manifestations become apparent.2 It even appears before women know they are pregnant.10 In normal implantation, the decidualized endometrium is invaded by trophoblasts, resulting in obliteration of the tunica media of myometrial spiral arteries and spiral artery remodeling.11 Nevertheless, in PE, spiral artery remodeling and trophoblast invasion are impaired. An augment in angiogenic markers will be created by the resultant placental ischemia, such as soluble endoglin (sEng) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1).12 Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 can bind to placental growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and then decreases their levels.13 These factors mediate downstream which can impose a marked impact on a vasoconstrictive state, microemboli, oxidative stress and create endothelial dysfunction. As a consequence, the clinical features of PE will be affected.14

Not only endothelial dysfunction but also immunologic aberrations contribute to PE. T helper cells can be conducive to neutralizing placental reactive oxygen species, angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) auto-antibodies, proinflammatory cytokines, and endothelin-1 by shifting toward the anti-inflammatory Th2 phenotype in normal pregnancy. But, in PE, T helper cells shift toward the Th1 phenotype in contrast, giving rise to apoptosis and reduced trophoblast invasion by increasing the release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-18 and IL-12, decreasing IL-10.15 Additional augment in sFlt-1 and complement system dysregulation are designed by elevated complement levels in PE. Women with PE also suggestive of immune imbalance for lessening histocompatibility complex human leukocyte antigen-E and -G.15

Underlying Genetics

Nowadays, a major impact had been made on clinical practices by advances in genetic technology.16 Exome sequencing and clinical genome, as crucial tools conduct a paramount role in the individualized medicine and implementation of prognostic.17 There is an increasing body of research searching for relation between genetics and PE.18 During a study in 2004, Swedish families with PE and gestational hypertension were examined. Compared with half-sisters, full sisters and mothers–daughters shared more similarities regarding gestational hypertension and PE. As persuasively revealed by the conclusion drawn from this research, there was gestational hypertension in 20%, heritability PE in 31%, and pregnancy-induced hypertension in 28% of cases.19

Compared with fathers who themselves were born from a pregnancy complicated by PE, and fathers who previously conceived a pregnancy complicated by PE with another partner, the incidence of PE is higher in mothers who were born from pregnancies complicated by PE.20 Johnson et al21 examined the genetic dissection locus on chromosome 2q22, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Their lab identified PE to be remarkably associated with 4 independent SNPs. Apart from that, these SNPs were similar with several quantitative CVD-related traits, which indicates that the underlying genetic mechanisms are shared in these 2 diseases.21

A study performed in Australia also found a correlation between CVD risk factors and SNPs, such as glucose levels, blood triglycerides, and body weight.22 In the future, we may eliminate such SNPs using genetic engineering techniques by turning off their expression. Yu et al23 found that the lessened postnatal vasculogenesis was associated with the upregulation of miR-146a expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). During the first 3 months of life, the miR-146a levels may also be a desirable predictor of microvascular development.23

The majority of the tested polymorphisms and genes are directly associated with the alterations underlying both CVDs and PE, which were observed in the pathological processes. How to identify the common transcriptomic signatures involved in CVDs and PE was one of the most significant studies of this kind.24 A novel, bioinformatic meta-analysis by Sitras et al24 included investigating placental tissue samples from preeclamptic women and gene expression profiles from cardiovascular patient blood samples. It found that 925 and 181 genes differentially expressed in PE and CVD and 22 genes severally were common for both disorders. Numerous factors were found to participate in the complex pathogenesis of both the diseases, such as chemokines, inflammation-mediated cytokines, interleukin signaling, oxidative stress, and B-cell activation.25-29

As a peroxisomal enzyme physiologically, ACOX2 is bound up with one of the stages in the degradation of bile acid and branched-chain fatty acids. Bile acid and fatty acid will be accumulated by subsequent ACOX2 deficiency and down-regulation of its gene.30 During the study conducted by Johansson et al31 they found that ACOX2 level was inversely correlated with triglyceride levels. The theory of heightened circulating triglyceride levels associated with the down-regulated ACOX2 was suggested.31 Endothelial dysfunction and elevated oxidative stress are associated with an abnormal lipid profile.32 Aside from that, high triglyceride levels, as well-known CVD risk factors, were proven to be elevated together with total serum free fatty acid level in preeclamptic patients. Hence, ACOX2 may be a possible genetic risk factor between PE and related CVDs.33-36

An enzyme involved inter which called microsomal EPHX1 plays a paramount role in regulation of the oxidation status of xenobiotic-derived intermediates.37 Just illustrated by a study in vitro assessing the influence of EPHX1 on embryo development in coculture, EPHX1 conducts a protective role against oxidative stress.38 What is more, EPHX1 is probable altered variants of the enzyme to disrupt its proper function, then influencing the development of CVDs and PE by epoxide-related cytotoxic damage and oxidative stress-mediated. An enzyme, another remarkable polymorphism concerns, eNOS can take part in nitric oxide (NO) synthesis in the vascular endothelium. Nitric oxide is implicated inter alia in regulating myocardial contractility, vascular tone and inhibiting platelet aggregation as a crucial relaxing factor.39 The altered expression of eNOS results in NO synthesis defects which possibly spawned from gene polymorphism. Apart from that, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and metabolic insulin resistance were found in eNOS-deficient mice.40 Among what was previously described, it seems plausible that eNOS genetic variants may be relevant to the disease outcome.

Pre-eclampsia and Cardiovascular Risk

The association between future maternal CVDs, even offspring, PE has been shown by several studies.41-44

Pre-eclampsia and Maternal Cardiovascular Risk

A myriad of studies has proved the relation between PE and maternal cardiovascular risk. During recent metaanalysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, such as body mass index, age, and diabetes mellitus, PE was still correlated with an elevated risk of stroke (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.95-1.46), death on account of coronary artery disease (RR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.25-3.51), death of CVD (RR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.83-2.66), heart failure (RR: 1.6, 95% CI: 0.73-3.5), more than 10 years after affecting by PE. During the first decade after PE, the risk for CVD-related death, stroke, and heart failure increase even higher.44

Risk factors are shared by PE and CVDs except for age and pregnancy-specific factors. But a direct causative correlation was not determined between them. In the study by Kestenbaum et al44, among women with previous severe PE, a higher number of thromboembolic events (hazard ratio (HR): 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3-4.2) and more than a 3-fold increment in cardiovascular events (stroke, percutaneous coronary artery interventions, or hospitalizations as a result of myocardial infarction (MI) were shown during a mean follow-up of approximately 8 years.45 The British CALIBER (Cardiovascular Research using Linked Bespoke Studies and Electronic Health Records) reported in the first 9 years after a delivery complicated by PE overall first-time cardiovascular event incidence of 2.77%, while in women after an uncomplicated pregnancy, the rate is 1.4% in contrast.46 Furthermore, a median 13-year follow-up from a Norwegian population-based cohort study, CVD-related death in women with a history of PE during pregnancy was augmented, such as, disease of the pulmonary circulation, coronary artery disease, or other diseases affecting the heart (RR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.01-2.70), but compared to women with a history of uncomplicated pregnancy, the risk of CVD-related death was markedly higher (RR: 8.12; 95% CI: 4.31-15.33).47

Aside from that, an increasing amount of evidence reported among women with recurrent PE a higher frequency of cerebrovascular disease (HR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.70-4.61) and heart failure (HR: 4.2; 95% CI: 2.9-6.1) compared to women with unaffected pregnancy.48

Pre-eclampsia and Cardiovascular Risk of the Offspring

A heightening amount of evidence revealed that children may have long-term cardiovascular sequelae after in utero exposure to PE.49 Pre-eclampsia has 2 manifestations, fetal and maternal, which had been proposed before (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Potential mechanistic link between exposure to PE in utero and offspring risk for CVD. CVD cardiovascular disease; PE, pre-eclampsia.

As mentioned above, mothers following preeclamptic pregnancies may have long-term cardiovascular sequelae. In 1993, the Barker hypothesis that children may also appear to suffer this risk after in utero exposure was proposed.50 During a systematic review by Davis et al51 in children and youngsters born to preeclamptic mothers, there is a 1.35 mm Hg rise in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and a 2.39 mm Hg increment in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Andraweera and Lassi52 performed a meta-analysis, where the offspring of preeclamptic mothers compared to offspring of non-preeclamptic mothers showed higher mean values of both DBP and SBP, with a 4.06 mm Hg and 5.17 mm Hg increase separately.52 These findings confirm children born to preeclamptic mothers have a noticeable increment in mean blood pressure. A 2.4 mm Hg rise in SBP is correlated with augmented mortality from stroke by 12% and from ischemic heart disease by 8%.

Defects in the pulmonary and systemic circulation of the offspring were stemmed from PE with vasculotoxic factors that cross the placenta. It can lead to exaggerated hypoxic pulmonary hypertension, and then premature CVD may occur in the systemic circulation later in life.53 In previous British studies, a comprehensive study of maternal–offspring pairs included 4654 children and their 3537 mothers. This research demonstrated the association between PE and gestational hypertension and higher blood pressure in offspring. Nevertheless, the study did not confirm any established associations.54

Researchers from Israel studied long-term cardiovascular effects in offspring in a cohort of 231 298 deliveries, including 0.9% pregnancies complicated by severe PE and 3.2% by mild PE. In this exploration, CVDs included pulmonary heart disease (n = 32), cardiomyopathy (n = 38), arrhythmias (n = 303), hypertension (n = 153), and others (n = 559). A linear correlation between CVD and PE was observed, and the risk increases with the severity of PE. This research demonstrated an association between PE and heart failure or arrhythmias. Furthermore, severe PE as an independent risk factor was found for long-term cardiovascular morbidity in term-born children.55

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is not only the major reason of infant mortality and morbidity but also the most ubiquitous birth defect. A study that was performed in Nigeria examined the possible connection between PE and CHD. It exhibited CHD in 3.3% of newborns from healthy mothers and in 21.2% of newborns from women with PE in contrast by the end of the 4th week of life.56

Conclusion

Nowadays, most current studies about the association between PE and cardiovascular risk are concentrated on common risk factors and clinical similarities. Nonetheless, the basis of pre-pregnancy factors may be influenced the possibility that augmented risk for both disorders, genetic aspects should be the main aspect in the future.57

In the future, it is essential for us to continuously conduct in-depth exploration on the basis of larger study populations and understand the pathogenesis of complex PE and PE-related CVDs by follow-ups. Apart from that, it is essential to dedicate to clearly defined ethnic populations-specific gene. It is imperative for us to concentrate on disease prevention by a yet population-specific and holistic approach to eventually yield measurable data.

From the literature overview, the evidence distinctly illustrates that PE is a significant risk factor for future CVD, and the challenge will influence future maternal, as well as offspring. Over time, more evidence may become available, and guidelines need to be introduced and developed into clinical practice, which can manage and recognize PE and the possible subsequent CVD events. It has been a pivotal public health issue in the identification of CVD risk factors early. Our review supports shared risk factors for CVD and PE, especially long-term maternal CVDs risk is strongly associated with PE.

On account of its multifactorial nature, it is still difficult to establish a clear causal mechanism between CVD and PE. Though the role of epigenetics and genetics has been proved, it is still impossible to determine the type and severity of inherited susceptibility to the disease. As a consequence, both the standards of treatment and the screening tests model must be determined to develop effective preventive strategies for the risk of CVDs.

Footnotes

Ethics Committee Approval: Not Applicable.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Y.L.Z. developed the theoretical formalism. Q.Y. wrote the manuscript with support from Y.L.Z. and K.H. K.H. and Y.L.Z. edited and modified the manuscript. All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Acknowledgments: The authors apologize to the many authors whose studies are important but could not be cited due to space limitation.

Declaration of Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

  • 1. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK140561/; 2011. Accessed November 28, 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sircar M, Thadhani R, Karumanchi SA. Pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2015;24(2):131 138. ( 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000105) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Jim B, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: pathogenesis, prevention, and long-term complications. Semin Nephrol. 2017;37(4):386 397. ( 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.05.011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Steegers EAP, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376(9741):631 644. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L, et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;4(2):97 104. ( 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.02.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(11):1243 1262. ( 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820faaf8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Markovitz AR, Stuart JJ, Horn J, et al. Does pregnancy complication history improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction? Findings from the HUNT study in Norway. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(14):1113 1120. ( 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy863) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice guidelines. Circulation 2019;139(25):e1082-e1143. ( 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227 3337. ( 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pankiewicz K, Szczerba E, Maciejewski T, Fijałkowska A. Non-obstetric complications in preeclampsia. Prz Menopauzalny. 2019;18(2):99 109. ( 10.5114/pm.2019.85785) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Phipps E, Prasanna D, Brima W, Jim B. Preeclampsia: updates in pathogenesis, definitions, and guidelines. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(6):1102 1113. ( 10.2215/CJN.12081115) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. El-Sayed AAF. Preeclampsia: a review of the pathogenesis and possible management strategies based on its pathophysiological derangements. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(5):593 598. ( 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.08.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mustafa R, Ahmed S, Gupta A, Venuto RC. A comprehensive review of hypertension in pregnancy. J Pregnancy. 2012;2012:105918. ( 10.1155/2012/105918) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Spradley FT. Sympathetic nervous system control of vascular function and blood pressure during pregnancy and preeclampsia. J Hypertens. 2019;37(3):476 487. ( 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001901) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Malik A, Jee B, Gupta SK. Preeclampsia: disease biology and burden, its management strategies with reference to India. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;15:23 31. ( 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.10.011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Horton RH, Lucassen AM. Recent developments in genetic/genomic medicine. Clin Sci (Lond). 2019;133(5):697 708. ( 10.1042/CS20180436) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Vassy JL, Lautenbach DM, McLaughlin HM, et al. The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine. Trials. 2014;15:85. ( 10.1186/1745-6215-15-85) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Founds SA, Tsigas E, Ren D, Barmada MM. Associating symptom phenotype and genotype in preeclampsia. Biol Res Nurs. 2018;20(2):126 136. ( 10.1177/1099800417754140) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Nilsson E, Salonen Ros H, Cnattingius S, Lichtenstein P. The importance of genetic and environmental effects for pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension: a family study. BJOG. 2004;111(3):200 206. ( 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00042x.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Esplin MS, Fausett MB, Fraser A, et al. Paternal and maternal components of the predisposition to preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(12):867 872. ( 10.1056/NEJM200103223441201) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Johnson MP, Brennecke SP, East CE, et al. Genetic dissection of the pre-eclampsia susceptibility locus on chromosome 2q22 reveals shared novel risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19(7):423 437. ( 10.1093/molehr/gat011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Løset M, Johnson MP, Melton PE, et al. Preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease share genetic risk factors on chromosome 2q22. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;4(2):178 185. ( 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.03.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yu GZ, Reilly S, Lewandowski AJ, et al. Neonatal micro-RNA profile determines endothelial function in offspring of hypertensive pregnancies. Hypertension. 2018;72(4):937 945. ( 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11343) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sitras V, Fenton C, Acharya G. Gene expression profile in cardiovascular disease and preeclampsia: a meta-analysis of the transcriptome based on raw data from human studies deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus. Placenta. 2015;36(2):170 178. ( 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.11.017) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Valenzuela FJ, Pérez-Sepúlveda A, Torres MJ, Correa P, Repetto GM, Illanes SE. Pathogenesis of preeclampsia: the genetic component. J Pregnancy. 2012;2012:632732. ( 10.1155/2012/632732) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kanda T, Takahashi T. Interleukin-6 and cardiovascular diseases. Jpn Heart J. 2004;45(2):183 193. ( 10.1536/jhj.45.183) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cordero-Reyes AM, Youker KA, Torre-Amione G. The role of B-cells in heart failure. Methodist deBakey Cardiovasc J. 2013;9(1):15 19. ( 10.14797/mdcj-9-1-15) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fettke F, Schumacher A, Costa SD, Zenclussen AC. B cells: the old new players in reproductive immunology. Front Immunol. 2014;5:285. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00285) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lockwood CJ, Yen CF, Basar M, et al. Preeclampsia-related inflammatory cytokines regulate interleukin-6 expression in human decidual cells. Am J Pathol. 2008;172(6):1571 1579. ( 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070629) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Baumgart E, Vanhooren JC, Fransen M, et al. Molecular characterization of the human peroxisomal branched-chain acyl-CoA oxidase: cDNA cloning, chromosomal assignment, tissue distribution, and evidence for the absence of the protein in Zellweger syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(24):13748 13753. ( 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13748) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Johansson A, Curran JE, Johnson MP, et al. Identification of ACOX2 as a shared genetic risk factor for preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(7):796 800. ( 10.1038/ejhg.2011.19) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sima AV, Stancu CS, Simionescu M. Vascular endothelium in atherosclerosis. Cell Tissue Res. 2009;335(1):191 203. ( 10.1007/s00441-008-0678-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Siddiqui Ia. Maternal serum lipids in women with pre-eclampsia. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(4):638 641. ( 10.4103/2141-9248.139358) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ray JG, Diamond P, Singh G, Bell CM. Brief overview of maternal triglycerides as a risk factor for pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2006;113(4):379 386. ( 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00889.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Harchaoui KEL, Visser ME, Kastelein JJP, Stroes ES, Dallinga-Thie GM. Triglycerides and cardiovascular risk. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009;5(3):216 222. ( 10.2174/157340309788970315) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Villa PM, Laivuori H, Kajantie E, Kaaja R. Free fatty acid profiles in preeclampsia. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2009;81(1):17 21. ( 10.1016/j.plefa.2009.05.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Farin FM, Janssen P, Quigley S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of microsomal and soluble epoxide hydrolase and the risk of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11(8):703 708. ( 10.1097/00008571-200111000-00009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cheong AWY, Lee YL, Liu WM, Yeung WSB, Lee KF. Oviductal microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS) level and enhances preimplantation mouse embryo development. Biol Reprod. 2009;81(1):126 132. ( 10.1095/biolreprod.108.071449) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Loscalzo J, Welch G. Nitric oxide and its role in the cardiovascular system. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1995;38(2):87 104. ( 10.1016/s0033-0620(05)80001-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Duplain H, Burcelin R, Sartori C, et al. Insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation. 2001;104(3):342 345. ( 10.1161/01.cir.104.3.342) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Schull MJ, Redelmeier DA. Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): ­population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1797 1803. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67726-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Lokki AI, Daly E, Triebwasser M, et al. Protective low-frequency variants for preeclampsia in the fms related tyrosine kinase 1 gene in the Finnish population. Hypertension. 2017;70(2):365 371. ( 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09406) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Lin YS, Tang CH, Yang CYC, et al. Effect of pre-eclampsia-eclampsia on major cardiovascular events among peripartum women in Taiwan. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(2):325 330. ( 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.073) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kestenbaum B, Seliger SL, Easterling TR, et al. Cardiovascular and thromboembolic events following hypertensive pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(5):982 989. ( 10.1016/j.ajkd.2003.07.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, et al. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular health: A systematic review and meta-­analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(2):e003497. ( 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003497) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Leon LJ, McCarthy FP, Direk K, et al. Preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease in a Large UK pregnancy cohort of linked electronic health Records: a CALIBER study. Circulation. 2019;140(13):1050 1060. ( 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038080) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Irgens HU, Reisaeter L, Irgens LM, Lie RT. Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2001;323(7323):1213 1217. ( 10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1213) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Berends AL, de Groot CJM, Sijbrands EJ, et al. Shared constitutional risks for maternal vascular-related pregnancy complications and future cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2008;51(4):1034 1041. ( 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101873) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wojczakowski W, Kimber-Trojnar Ż, Dziwisz F, Słodzińska M, Słodziński H, Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B. Preeclampsia and cardiovascular risk for offspring. J Clin Med. 2021;10(14):3154. ( 10.3390/jcm10143154) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Barker DJ. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. Br Heart J. 1993;69(3):195 196. ( 10.1136/hrt.69.3.195) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Davis EF, Lazdam M, Lewandowski AJ, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in children and young adults born to preeclamptic ­pregnancies: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1552 e1561. ( 10.1542/peds.2011-3093) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Andraweera PH, Lassi ZS. Cardiovascular risk factors in offspring of preeclamptic pregnancies-systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr. 2019;208:104 113.e6. ( 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Jayet PY, Rimoldi SF, Stuber T, et al. Pulmonary and systemic vascular dysfunction in young offspring of mothers with preeclampsia. Circulation. 2010;122(5):488 494. ( 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.941203) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Lawlor DA, Macdonald-Wallis C, Fraser A, et al. Cardiovascular biomarkers and vascular function during childhood in the offspring of mothers with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(3):335 345. ( 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr300) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Nahum Sacks K, Friger M, Shoham-Vardi I, et al. Prenatal exposure to preeclampsia as an independent risk factor for long-term cardiovascular morbidity of the offspring. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;13:181 186. ( 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.06.013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Yilgwan CS, Pam VC, Ige OO, et al. Profile of congenital heart disease in infants born following exposure to preeclampsia. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0229987. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0229987) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Lisowska M, Pietrucha T, Sakowicz A. Preeclampsia and related cardiovascular risk: common genetic background. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(8):71. ( 10.1007/s11906-018-0869-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anatolian Journal of Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Turkish Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES