Abstract
Background
Comprehensive evaluation of the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost attributable to chlamydia, gonorrhea, andtrichomoniasis in the United States is lacking.
Methods
We adapted a previous probability-tree model to estimate the average number of lifetime QALYs lost due to genital chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis, per incident infection and at the population level, by sex and age group. We conducted multivariate sensitivity analyses to address uncertainty around key parameter values.
Results
The estimated total discounted lifetime QALYs lost for men and women, respectively, due to infections acquired in 2018, were 1541 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 186–6358) and 111 872 (95% UI, 29 777–267 404) for chlamydia, 989 (95% UI, 127–3720) and 12 112 (95% UI, 2 410–33 895) for gonorrhea, and 386 (95% UI, 30–1851) and 4576 (95% UI, 13–30 355) for trichomoniasis. Total QALYs lost were highest among women aged 15–24 years with chlamydia. QALYs lost estimates were highly sensitive to disutilities (health losses) of infections and sequelae, and to duration of infections and chronic sequelae for chlamydia and gonorrhea in women.
Conclusions
The 3 sexually transmitted infections cause substantial health losses in the United States, particularly gonorrhea and chlamydia among women. The estimates of lifetime QALYs lost per infection help to prioritize prevention policies and inform cost-effectiveness analyses of sexually transmitted infection interventions.
Keywords: chlamydia, burden of disease, gonorrhea, quality-adjusted life-years, sexually transmitted diseases, trichomoniasis
Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis cause substantial lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost in the United States in 2018, particularly among women. The estimates of lifetime QALYs lost per infection help to prioritize prevention policies and inform cost-effectiveness analyses of STI interventions.
In the United States, there were 1 758 668 diagnoses of Chlamydia trachomatis infections and 583 405 diagnoses of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections reported in 2018, making chlamydia and gonorrhea the 2 most common notifiable infections in that year [1]. Trichomonas vaginalis (trichomoniasis) is a common sexually transmitted protozoal infection. Trichomoniasis is not a notifiable disease in the United States, and over 80% of cases are estimated to be asymptomatic [2]. In 2016, there were 222 000 initial physician office visits for trichomoniasis [1]. Chlamydia and gonorrhea are important causes of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), chronic pelvic pain (CPP), tubal factor infertility (TFI), and ectopic pregnancy (EP) in women and epididymitis (EDS) in men [3–5]. The risk of reproductive health outcomes following trichomoniasis is less understood, but it is associated with increased risk of PID [6]. In addition, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis are associated with an increased risk of acquisition and transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in observational studies [7–9].
Estimates of the quality of life impacts of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis are needed to quantify the long-term health burden of these 3 sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The estimates can be used to inform cost-effectiveness analyses of STI prevention interventions. For example, gonorrhea vaccines are under development, and estimating the health burden caused by the infection is necessary to quantify the potential benefits from a vaccine [10].
Use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) enables comparison across a wide range of conditions and outcomes. Although health state utility values and QALYs lost associated with complications such as PID and/or TFI attributable to chlamydia and gonorrhea infections have been estimated in several primary studies [11–15], comprehensive evaluations of QALYs lost associated with infections and downstream health consequences secondary to infections have not been documented, particularly for trichomoniasis, and for all 3 infections in men. We estimated the QALYs lost per incident infection with C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis, and quantify the population-level QALYs lost attributable to each of the 3 STIs in 2018 by sex and age group.
METHODS
Analytic Overview
We used probability-tree models to represent clinical outcomes of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis among men and women. We estimated health losses associated with the health outcomes along each distinct path of the probability tree and aggregated these into the total numbers of expected discounted lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection. Together with incidence estimates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis in 2018 we estimated the overall population-level discounted lifetime QALYs lost by age and sex. Model inputs and parameter values were derived from a variety of sources (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 7). We conducted multivariate sensitivity analyses accounting for uncertainties in input parameters. All analyses were undertaken in R version 3.5.2.
Table 1.
Model Input Parameters Describing Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, Trichomoniasis, and Sequelae Probabilities, Utilities, and Durations, and Proportions Tested and Treated in Men and Women
| Parameter | Mean Estimate | 95% Uncertainty Intervala |
|---|---|---|
| Probabilities related to infections | ||
| Proportion of infections that are symptomatic | ||
| ȃChlamydia, men | 0.162 | 0.079 to 0.270 |
| ȃChlamydia, women | 0.254 | 0.172 to 0.345 |
| ȃGonorrhea, men | 0.588 | 0.296 to 0.840 |
| ȃGonorrhea, women | 0.318 | 0.154 to 0.507 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, men | 0.088 | 0.027 to 0.184 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, women | 0.195 | 0.106 to 0.304 |
| Probability of treatment given symptomatic infectionb | ||
| ȃChlamydia, men | 0.935 | 0.919 to 0.943 |
| ȃChlamydia, women | 0.892 | 0.842 to 0.922 |
| ȃGonorrhea, men | 0.740 | 0.720 to 0.753 |
| ȃGonorrhea, women | 0.745 | 0.716 to 0.762 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, men | 0.374 | 0.078 to 0.624 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, women | 0.832 | 0.530 to 0.945 |
| Probability of treatment given asymptomatic infectionb | ||
| ȃChlamydia, men | 0.140 | 0.075 to 0.227 |
| ȃChlamydia, women | 0.241 | 0.188 to 0.296 |
| ȃGonorrhea, men | 0.021 | 0.010 to 0.038 |
| ȃGonorrhea, women | 0.070 | 0.038 to 0.118 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, men | 0 | Fixed |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, women | 0 | Fixed |
| Probability of PID given symptomatic treated infectionc | ||
| ȃChlamydia | 0.016 | 0.006 to 0.035 |
| ȃGonorrhea | 0.011 | 0.004 to 0.021 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis | 0.001 | 0.000 to 0.007 |
| Probability of PID given asymptomatic treated infectionc | ||
| ȃChlamydia | 0.027 | 0.008 to 0.065 |
| ȃGonorrhea | 0.027 | 0.008 to 0.065 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis | 0.002 | 0.000 to 0.019 |
| Probability of PID given untreated infectionc | ||
| ȃChlamydia | 0.161 | 0.069 to 0.284 |
| ȃGonorrhea | 0.038 | 0.014 to 0.078 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis | 0.002 | 0.000 to 0.026 |
| Probability of CPP given PID | 0.261 | 0.229 to 0.295 |
| Probability of TFI given PID | 0.168 | 0.114 to 0.229 |
| Probability of EP given PID | 0.070 | 0.048 to 0.098 |
| Probability of urethritis given symptomatic infection | 1 | Fixed |
| Probability of urethritis given asymptomatic infection | 0 | Fixed |
| Probability of EDSd given untreated chlamydia and gonorrhea | 0.043 | 0.001 to 0.160 |
| Probability of EDSd given untreated trichomoniasis | 0.003 | 0.000 to 0.029 |
| Probability of EDSd given treated infection | 0 | Fixed |
| State-specific durations, y | ||
| Symptomatic treated infection | ||
| ȃChlamydia, mene | 0.058 | 0.032 to 0.109 |
| ȃChlamydia, womene | 0.111 | 0.064 to 0.204 |
| ȃGonorrhea, mene | 0.036 | 0.023 to 0.061 |
| ȃGonorrhea, womene | 0.071 | 0.049 to 0.113 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, men | 0.384 | 0.120 to 1.734 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, women | 0.159 | 0.055 to 0.621 |
| Asymptomatic treated infection | ||
| ȃChlamydia, men | 0.342 | 0.288 to 0.398 |
| ȃChlamydia, women | 0.186 | 0.075 to 0.373 |
| ȃGonorrhea, men | 0.342 | 0.288 to 0.398 |
| ȃGonorrhea, women | 0.186 | 0.075 to 0.373 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, men | 0.384 | 0.120 to 1.734 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, women | 0.159 | 0.055 to 0.621 |
| Untreated infectionf | ||
| ȃChlamydia, men | 1.018 | 0.648 to 1.540 |
| ȃChlamydia, women | 1.090 | 0.931 to 1.274 |
| ȃGonorrhea, men | 0.129 | 0.076 to 0.206 |
| ȃGonorrhea, women | 0.258 | 0.154 to 0.411 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, men | 0.155 | 0.088 to 0.255 |
| ȃTrichomoniasis, women | 0.738 | 0.434 to 1.191 |
| PID | 0.028 | 0.018 to 0.041 |
| CPP | g | 5 to 10 y |
| TFI | g | 5 to 10 y |
| EP | 0.078 | 0.051 to 0.113 |
| EDS | 0.019 | 0.013 to 0.028 |
| State-specific utilities | ||
| Symptomatic chlamydia, womenh | 0.994 | 0.749 to 1.000 |
| Symptomatic gonorrhea, womenh | 0.994 | 0.849 to 1.000 |
| Symptomatic trichomoniasis, womenh | 0.994 | 0.849 to 1.000 |
| Symptomatic urethral infection, menh | 0.961 | 0.839 to 0.991 |
| Asymptomatic infection | 1 | Fixed |
| PIDi | 0.756 | 0.645 to 0.856 |
| CPPi | 0.759 | 0.587 to 0.899 |
| TFIi | 0.905 | 0.814 to 0.970 |
| EPi | 0.731 | 0.570 to 0.870 |
| EDSi | 0.665 | 0.454 to 0.854 |
Abbreviations: CPP, chronic pelvic pain; EDS, epididymitis; EP, ectopic pregnancy; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; TFI, tubal factor infertility.
The distributions for the parameter uncertainty intervals, and the source studies are reported in Supplementary Table 7.
The method to estimate probability of symptomatic and asymptomatic infections that receive treatment is provided in Supplementary Section 2.
The probability of PID given infection for any of the 3 STIs was approximated by duration of the infection multiplied by the annual rate of PID given the infection with details in Supplementary Section 3. Durations of the 3 STIs are reported in Table 1 with details in Supplementary Section 2 and Supplementary Table 1.
We defined EDS to include epididymo-orchitis according to the STI Treatment Guidelines, 2021 [17].
For chlamydia and gonorrhea, the method to estimate durations of symptomatic treated infection is reported in Supplementary Section 2 and Supplementary Table 1.
Durations of untreated infections of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis were estimated as the inverse of natural clearance rate, which are described in Supplementary Table 1.
Mean duration taken from uniform distribution between 5 years and 10 years (Supplementary Table 4a and 4b) according to previous analyses which assumed much shorter durations based on unspecified evidence [18]. We conducted 2 sensitivity analyses: (1) duration fixed at 5 years (Supplementary Table 4a) and (2) duration as lifetime (Supplementary Table 4c) using a lifetable approach described in the Li et al study [16].
Differences on distributions of symptomatic infections utilities between main analysis and sensitivity analyses are reported in Supplementary Section 4 in detail.
Differences on distributions of sequelae utilities between main analysis and sensitivity analyses are reported in Supplementary Section 4 in detail.
Model Structure and Probability of Key Clinical Outcomes
We used probability trees to model clinical outcomes of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis, adapted from a model framework described in Li et al [16]. We assumed a similar set of secondary outcomes for all 3 STIs examined using the same probability-tree structures, but as relevant allowed model input values (ie, probabilities, durations, and utility) to vary across the 3 STIs. Separate trees were specified for men and women (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Figure 1.
Probability tree for sequelae of gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomoniasis among women (Panel A), with complications of PID shown in Panel B. Abbreviations: CPP, chronic pelvic pain; EP, ectopic pregnancy; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; TFI, tubal factor infertility.
Figure 2.
Probability tree for sequelae of gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomoniasis among men. Abbreviation: EDS, epididymitis.
For women, each STI was categorized as symptomatic or asymptomatic with different durations of infections, which determined the probability of developing PID and subsequent complications (Figure 1) [19]. Although treatment for infections is not explicitly distinguished as a separate branch in Figure 1, the estimated durations of infections accounted for the fraction of cases treated. Possible complications following PID were CPP, EP, and TFI (Figure 1B ). The probability that an infection would be symptomatic was derived from estimates from Kreisel et al and Lewis et al [20, 21]. Proportions of treated symptomatic or asymptomatic infections, and durations of symptomatic and asymptomatic infections (distinct for treated or untreated) were estimated based on the parameters in these studies [20, 21] (Supplementary Material Section 2 and Supplementary Table 1). Probabilities of PID and sequelae (CPP, EP, and TFI) were estimated based on synthesizing evidence (Supplementary Material Section 3).
For men, infections were categorized as symptomatic or asymptomatic urethral infections (Figure 2). We assumed that urethritis was present in all symptomatic infections for the duration from symptom onset to testing due to symptoms (Supplementary Table 1), and that urethritis was not present in asymptomatic infections [22]. There is sparse evidence on the relationship between duration of infection and sequelae development for men, and EDS was modeled using a probability that was independent of duration (Supplementary Material Section 3).
Lifetime QALYs Lost per Incident Infection
Utilities for clinical outcomes related to the 3 STIs and sequelae were estimated based on weights from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) disability weights study [23] and a modeling study from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) using the Health Utility Index [15]. Disability weights represent the magnitude of health loss associated with specific health outcomes are measured on a scale from 0 to 1, where 0 equals a state of full health and 1 equals death. Compared to the IOM study, disability weights from the GBD implied smaller health losses associated with each outcome, and the GBD estimates can be seen as more conservative estimates of QALYs lost due to the STIs. In our model, utility values for an infection with any of the 3 STIs was specified as a distribution with mean value equal to estimated utility (1 minus the disability weight from the GBD). The lower bound of the 95% uncertainty interval (UI) was set as the infection-specific IOM estimate with the upper bound as 1. For sequelae of infection, distributions around the utility values were defined with mean values taken as the average of estimates reported by GBD and IOM, with lower and upper bounds defined by the IOM and GBD estimates, respectively. Details are provided in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Section 4.
Utility weights for infections and sequelae were multiplied by background utilities reflecting chronic comorbidities by age, based on nationally representative EQ-5D index scores (Supplementary Table 4c) [24]. CPP and TFI were treated as chronic sequelae occurring 5 years after infection, and durations were assumed to vary between 5 to 10 years and were incorporated into QALYs lost using a life table approach [16] (Supplementary Table 4a and 4b). Age-specific mortality rates for women were derived from National Center for Health Statistics data [25]. QALYs lost incurred in years after the incidence of infection were discounted to the year of infection (2018), using a discount rate of 3% per year [26]. Based on the probability tree models in Figure 1 and Figure 2, discounted lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection were estimated by summing the expected losses for each unique sequela or sequelae combination (the product of the probability, duration, and disutility).
QALYs Lost at Population Level and Outcome Measures
Incidence estimates for the United States in 2018 were obtained from Kreisel et al [20]. (chlamydia and gonorrhea) and from the Lewis et al (trichomoniasis) [21]. Consistent with these studies [20, 21], we stratified the population in our model by sex and age groups defined as 15–24 and 25–39 years for chlamydia and gonorrhea, and 15–24, 25–39, and 40–59 years for trichomoniasis. Estimates of incidence by disease, sex, and age group are reported in Supplementary Table 5. The population size in the United States in 2018 by sex and age group was estimated using the American Community Survey full resident population estimates [20, 21, 27] (Supplementary Table 6). We computed the QALYs lost at the population level as the product of population size, incidence rates per population, and discounted lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection for each STI. Results of QALYs lost are summarized in terms of aggregated population-level counts, as well as per 1000 person-years (calculated as the total numbers of QALYs lost in the United States due to infection acquired in 2018 divided by the population size and multiplied by 1000). From our modeled results, we extracted the composition of lifetime QALYs lost due to each sequela by sex and STI.
Sensitivity Analysis
We performed multivariate sensitivity analyses accounting for uncertainty in (1) incidence in each subpopulation (sex and age group), (2) probabilities that infections are symptomatic, (3) probabilities of infected persons receiving treatment by each subpopulation and symptom status, (4) durations of infections by subpopulation and symptom status, (5) sequelae probabilities, (6) durations of sequelae, and (7) utility values associated with each health outcome. Input parameters were drawn from the distributions estimated by studies in Supplementary Table 7.
We conducted additional sensitivity analyses on the discount rate and our quality-of-life assumptions. First, we present undiscounted estimates in addition to the base case estimates that used a 3% discount rate. Second, we conducted 2 sensitivity analyses around the choice of utility values and sequelae durations to represent extreme cases, including (1) using utility estimates from the GBD Disability Weights study with duration of chronic sequelae fixed at 5 years (Supplementary Table 4a) for a lower extreme on QALYs; and (2) using utility estimates from the IOM with lifetime duration of chronic sequelae (Supplementary Table 4c) for an upper extreme.
We sampled parameters 1000 times independently from the parameters’ distributions reported in Table 1. We ran the probability-tree models with the sampled parameter sets for the main and sensitivity analyses separately. We calculated mean and 95% uncertainty intervals values for each study outcome.
RESULTS
Discounted Lifetime QALYs Lost per Incident Infection
The estimated discounted lifetime QALYs lost per 1000 incident infections among men were 0.94 (95% UI, 0.12–3.85) due to chlamydia (for ages 15–39 years), 1.43 (95% UI, 0.19–5.48) due to gonorrhea (ages 15–39 years), and 0.12 (95% UI, 0.01–0.52) due to trichomoniasis (ages 15–59 years) (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 8). The relatively small numbers of QALYs lost in men relate to relatively short durations, from several days to weeks, of sequelae for men. On a per-infection basis, the average number of QALYs lost for gonorrhea was 1.5 times that of chlamydia and 11.9 times that of trichomoniasis.
Figure 3.
Discounted lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis by sex and age group in the United States in 2018. Abbreviations: QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; UI, uncertainty interval.
The discounted lifetime QALYs lost per 1000 incident infections of chlamydia and gonorrhea were higher for women than men, with estimated QALYs for women of 46.98 (95% UI, 12.87–113.27) for chlamydia and 14.22 (95% UI, 3.26–39.14) for gonorrhea (ages 15–39 years) (Figure 3). For trichomoniasis, QALYs lost per 1000 incident infections in women (ages 15–59 years) was much smaller (1.35; 95% UI, 0.003–10.67; Supplementary Table 8). The average number of discounted lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection was 3.3-fold higher for chlamydia than for gonorrhea in women, and 34.8-fold higher for chlamydia than for trichomoniasis. QALYs lost per infection were higher for chlamydia than gonorrhea due to a higher probability of developing PID and chronic sequelae of CPP and TFI. Trichomoniasis had the lowest QALYs lost per incident infection given risk of PID during trichomoniasis is thought to be substantially lower than for chlamydia [9, 28–30].
Population-Level Discounted QALYs Lost
The population-level discounted lifetime QALYs lost for all the 3 STIs acquired in 2018 was 131 477 (95% UI, 34 325–324 487), with 128 561 (95% UI, 33 177–315 663) among women and 2916 (95% UI, 380–11 504) among men. The population-level discounted lifetime QALYs lost for infections acquired in 2018 were 1541 (95% UI, 186–6358) due to chlamydia among men aged 15–39 years, 989 (95% UI, 127–3720) due to gonorrhea among men aged 15–39 years, and 386 (95% UI, 30–1851) due to trichomoniasis among men aged 15–59 years (Supplementary Table 9). The population-level discounted lifetime QALYs lost by age groups analyzed were highest for chlamydia among men aged 15–24 and 25–39 years, followed by gonorrhea among men aged 25–39 years (Figure 4), primarily driven by patterns of incidence across infections and ages (highest for chlamydia in men aged 15–24 years) (Supplementary Table 5), and a larger number of QALYs lost per incident infection for gonorrhea compared to chlamydia or trichomoniasis for men (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 8).
Figure 4.
Population-level number of discounted lifetime QALYs lost associated with infection of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis by sex and age group in the United States in 2018. Abbreviations: QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; UI, uncertainty interval.
The population-level discounted lifetime QALYs lost for infections acquired in 2018 were 111 872 (95% UI, 29 777–267 404) due to chlamydia among women aged 15–39 years, 12 112 (95% UI, 2 410–33 895) due to gonorrhea among women aged 15–39 years, and 4576 (95% UI, 13–30 355) due to trichomoniasis among women aged 15–59 years (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 9). The population-level discounted lifetime QALYs lost were highest for chlamydia among women aged 15–24 years and, followed by chlamydia among women aged 25–39 years (Figure 4). Both the incidence rate (Supplementary Table 5) and QALYs lost per infection were much higher among women aged 15–24 years with chlamydia than gonorrhea and trichomoniasis (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 8).
Lifetime QALYs lost per 1000 person-years reflect variation in incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis by sex across age groups. For both men and women, the QALYs lost per 1000 person-years were highest among individuals aged 15–24 years with chlamydia among all the 3 infections across population subgroups (Figure 5), primarily due to the highest estimated incidence for chlamydia in ages 15–24 years (Supplementary Table 5).
Figure 5.
Population-level number of discounted lifetime QALYs lost per 1000 population associated with infection of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis by sex and age group in the United States in 2018. Abbreviations: QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; UI, uncertainty interval.
Composition of Lifetime Discounted QALYs Lost
Among men the main contributor to the total QALYs lost was urethritis, which contributed 74% (95% UI, 25%–99%) of QALYs lost for chlamydia, 85% (95% UI, 44%–99%) for gonorrhea, and 92% (95% UI, 22%–100%) for trichomoniasis (Figure 6). Symptomatic urethral infections were more common for gonorrhea than for chlamydia (Table 1).
Figure 6.
Decomposition of total discounted lifetime QALYs lost by infections and sequelae of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis by sex in the United States in 2018. The QALYs lost decomposed in this figure are the discounted lifetime QALYs lost per infection reported in Figure 3. The first bar for each of the 3 STIs for women represents the QALYs lost from the symptomatic infection itself. Bars 2 through 5 represent the QALYs lost due to each sequela (arising from both symptomatic and asymptomatic infection), and the sum of the proportions of QALYs lost from infection and sequelae for each infection is 100%. Means are indentified as historgrams and 95% UIs are indentified as error bars. Abbreviations: CPP, chronic pelvic pain; CT, chlamydia; EDS, epididymitis; EP, ectopic pregnancy; GC, gonorrhea; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; TFI, tubal factor infertility; TV, trichomoniasis; UTS, urethritis.
QALYs lost were higher in women than in men for all 3 STIs and across all age groups. The duration of chronic sequelae in women was estimated to be substantially longer than the duration of sequelae in men. For chlamydia in women, the composition of total QALYs lost was estimated to be 75% (95% UI, 48%–91%) due to CPP and 20% (95% UI, 6%–40%) due to TFI (Figure 6). The composition of total QALYs lost among women with gonorrhea was similar to that for chlamydia (Figure 6). The composition of total QALYs lost among women with trichomoniasis was estimated to be 78% (95% UI, 1%–100%) from symptomatic trichomoniasis and 17% (95% UI, 0%–83%) from CPP, primarily due to the assumed lower risk of PID for trichomoniasis [9, 28–30]. We report QALYs lost per case of PID in Supplementary Table 13.
Results of Sensitivity Analyses
QALYs lost per incident infection were highly sensitive to the choice of utility values and durations. Comparing estimates based on IOM utilities versus estimates based on GBD utilities, the discounted lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection quadrupled for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis for men (Supplementary Tables 10 and 11).
Utilities and durations for chronic sequelae (CPP and TFI) were important determinants of overall QALYs lost for women. The discounted lifetime QALYs lost due to CPP when using utilities from the IOM study and assuming lifetime duration was almost 30 times higher than the estimate using utilities from the GBD study and assuming duration of 5 years (Supplementary Table 4c). This 30-fold difference for CPP resulted in a similar difference for the overall discounted lifetime QALYs lost per infection for women based on the 2 sets of assumptions (Supplementary Tables 10 and 11), as CPP contributes the largest proportion of QALYs lost among infection and sequelae for women (Figure 6).
Discounting did not affect estimates of QALYs lost for men, given sequalae are short term and occur in the same year of infection (Supplementary Tables 8 and 12). For women, undiscounted lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection were nearly 30% higher than those when using a discount rate of 3% per year for all 3 infections (Supplementary Tables 8 and 12). Although the lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection and population-level total QALYs lost for women were sensitive to discounting, the composition of total QALYs lost for women changed minimally in relation to the choice over discounting.
DISCUSSION
We quantified the discounted lifetime QALYs lost in the United States due to chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis acquired in 2018. On both a per-infection basis and in terms of total aggregate QALYs lost nationwide, chlamydia imposed the greatest burden, followed by gonorrhea, then trichomoniasis. Published estimates of the QALYs lost in the United States due to syphilis [31] suggest that syphilis has a higher QALY lost per infection (0.09; 95% UI, 0.03–0.19) than the 3 STIs we examined, and that syphilis is the second only to chlamydia in terms of the aggregate QALYs lost nationwide (13 349; 95% UI, 5071–31 360).
We accounted for a wide spectrum of long-term sequelae caused by the infections. Our estimates of QALYs lost in women revealed the substantial burden of CPP, which has been described as a neglected reproductive health morbidity [32]. While there has been research on acute PID and TFI for women with chlamydia and gonorrhea [33–35], our results suggest that CPP causes the most health losses among women, contributing more than 70% (74.5%; 95% UI, 45.1%–90.6%) of the total QALYs lost. This underscores the importance of accounting for CPP when considering the benefits of chlamydia and gonorrhea interventions for women, and the need for further research on the burden of CPP and potential strategies to reduce this burden [36].
The estimated lifetime QALYs lost attributable to the 3 STIs among men were substantially lower than those for women. However, transmission dynamics for STIs imply that sexual health among men will affect the health of women and their children during pregnancy and childbirth [37]. Thus, the estimates of QALYs lost in relation to the primary infection do not account for the full value of interventions that aim to avert these infections. Several studies have demonstrated that chlamydia screening in high-risk men and combined screening in men and women were cost-saving [38, 39]. In addition, interventions promoting partner notification and treatment of the 3 STIs contribute to reduce repeat infections in women and incidence and long-term QALYs lost in the entire population [40–42].
Estimates for disability weights (utilities) differ substantially across previous studies [43] including the 2 studies used in our analysis, GBD reporting community-based measures and IOM reporting measures from expert perspective [15, 23]. However, there is consistency in the rankings of disutilities across sequelae between the GBD and the IOM study (eg, larger disability weights for CPP than PID and TFI in both studies). Community-based utilities are usually higher than expert-based utilities, and we estimated QALYs lost by averaging utilities from the 2 sources as well as considering extreme cases in sensitivity analyses. Future studies that apply our estimates should account explicitly for large uncertainty around the health state utility values.
Estimates of lifetime discounted QALYs lost per incidence of gonorrhea were similar to the estimates in our previous study [16]. For example, using utility estimates from the IOM study with lifetime duration of chronic sequelae, our estimated discounted lifetime QALYs lost per incidence of gonorrhea for women aged 15–39 years was 0.087 (95% UI, 0.026–0.202) (Supplementary Table 11), similar to that reported in our previous study (0.093; 95% UI, 0.022–0.220) [16]. When using utilities estimates synthesized from the GBD 2019 study and the IOM study, our estimates of QALYs lost per infection (Figure 3) and per case of PID due to the 3 infections (Supplementary Table 13) were smaller than estimates in previous studies [12, 16].
Substantial uncertainty around the probability of developing PID from trichomoniasis limited the estimate's reliability. We varied this probability from 0 to 0.79 (relative to the probability of PID due to chlamydia), in line with high variability across previous studies [5, 22]. The large uncertainty in estimates of QALYs lost from trichomoniasis reflects the data gaps in the natural history of trichomoniasis. We relied on estimates of incidence, probabilities of symptoms, and natural clearance rate from 2 modeling studies [20, 21], which used similar methodology across the infections, and represent the most up-to-date evidence of the epidemiology of these infections. Reliance on one source per STI for infection epidemiology is a limitation and reflects data gaps in the field.
We did not include QALYs lost associated with STI-associated HIV infections, or pregnancy-related adverse outcomes [44] due to the STIs, given relatively limited evidence base on the proportion of these outcomes that are attributable to the 3 STIs compared to the direct consequences emphasized in our study. Rigorous epidemiological studies are needed to improve our understanding of the role of specific STIs and the many confounding factors present. The restriction of the analysis to a small number of selected sequelae reflects current evidence on the burden of STIs and results in conservative estimates. Like any mathematical modelling study, our estimation relied on a number of simplifying assumptions. For example, we assumed that the probability of PID for women with gonorrhea was the same as for chlamydia, and we did not consider the increasing risk of PID among women with repeated chlamydial infection. Gonorrhea may be associated with higher probability of PID than chlamydia and repeated infections may increase the risk of PID and sequelae [5, 45], and our estimates of QALYs lost due to chlamydia and gonorrhea for women could be underestimated.
Our study provides comprehensive estimates of the lifetime QALYs lost per incident infection and overall population health burden of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis acquired in 2018. Estimates of lifetime QALYs lost for incident STIs in the United States are valuable for informing cost-effectiveness analyses of STIs prevention interventions and prioritizing prevention policies. Our detailed documentation of methodology allows future studies to adjust relevant parameters and select appropriate estimates for their research question. We hope our findings from sensitivity analyses promote more research into these important but poorly estimated parameters in the future.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at The Journal of Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Yunfei Li, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Shiying You, Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kyueun Lee, Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Reza Yaesoubi, Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Katherine Hsu, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention and HIV/AIDS Surveillance, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Thomas L Gift, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Harrell W Chesson, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andrés A Berruti, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joshua A Salomon, Center for Health Policy/Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Minttu M Rönn, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Notes
Disclaimer. The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Financial support. This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Epidemiologic and Economic Modeling Agreement (grant number 5 NU38PS004651). Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Epidemiologic and Economic Modeling Agreement (grant number 5 NU38PS004651).
References
- 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2018. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . About notifiable infectious diseases and conditions data, 21 October 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nndss/data-statistics/infectious-tables/about.html. Accessed 9 January 2023.
- 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2016. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Tracking the hidden epidemics: trends in STDs in the United States 2000. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Reekie J, Donovan B, Guy R, et al. Risk of pelvic inflammatory disease in relation to chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, repeat testing, and positivity: a population-based cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66:437–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cherpes TL, Wiesenfeld HC, Melan MA, et al. The associations between pelvic inflammatory disease, trichomonas vaginalis infection, and positive herpes simplex virus type 2 serology. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33:747–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rottingen JA, William Cameron DM, Garnett GP. A systematic review of the epidemiologic interactions between classic sexually transmitted diseases and HIV: how much really is known? Sex Transm Dis 2001; 28:579–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect 1999; 75:3–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Schumann JA, Plasner S. Trichomoniasis. In: Statpearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534826/. Accessed 19 January 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gottlieb SL, Ndowa F, Hook EW, et al. Gonococcal vaccines: public health value and preferred product characteristics; report of a WHO global stakeholder consultation, January 2019. Vaccine 2020; 38:4362–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kuppermann M, Learman LA, Schembri M, et al. Effect of noncancerous pelvic problems on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:633–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Smith KJM, Tsevat JM, Ness RBM, Wiesenfeld HCM, Roberts MSM. Quality of life utilities for pelvic inflammatory disease health states. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:307–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Songer TJ, Lave JR, Kamlet MS, Frederick S, Ness RB. Preferences for fertility in women with pelvic inflammatory disease. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1344–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Trent M, Lehmann HP, Qian Q, Thompson CB, Ellen JM, Frick KD. Adolescent and parental utilities for the health states associated with pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Infect 2011; 87:583–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Study Priorities for Vaccine Development , Stratton KR, Durch JS, Lawrence RS, eds. Vaccines for the 21st century: A tool for decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li Y, Rönn MM, Tuite AR, et al. Estimated costs and quality-adjusted life-years lost due to N. gonorrhoeae infections acquired in 2015 in the United States: a modelling study of overall burden and disparities by age, race/ethnicity, and other factors. Lancet Reg Health Am 2022; 16:100364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep 2021; 70:1–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Aledort JE, Hook EWI, Weinstein MC, Goldie SJM. The cost effectiveness of gonorrhea screening in urban emergency departments. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32:425–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tuite AR, Jayaraman GC, Allen VG, Fisman DN. Estimation of the burden of disease and costs of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Canada. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39:260–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kreisel KM, Weston EJ, St. Cyr SB, Spicknall IH. Estimates of the prevalence and incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhea among US men and women, 2018. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48:222–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lewis FMT, Spicknall IH, Flagg EW, Papp JR, Kreisel KM. Incidence and prevalence of trichomonas vaginalis infection among persons aged 15 to 59 years: United States, 2018. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48:232–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. John J, Donald WH. Asymptomatic urethral gonorrhoea in men. Br J Vener Dis 1978; 54:322–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network . Global burden of disease study 2019 (GBD 2019) disability weights. Seattle: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V. Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Decis Making 2006; 26:410–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Arias E, Xu J. United States life tables, 2018. National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics, 2020. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/97643. Accessed 16 April 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lopez AD, Murray CCJL. The global burden of disease, 1990–2020. Nat Med 1998; 4:1241–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. US Census Bureau . American community survey, 2018 American community survey 1-year estimates, Table S0201, 18 February 2020. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation/table-and-geography-changes/2018/1-year.html. Accessed 10 March 2022.
- 28. Kumar S, Chesson HW, Spicknall IH, Kreisel KM, Gift TL. The estimated lifetime medical cost of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis in the United States 2018. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48:238–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Owusu-Edusei K, Chesson HW, Gift TL, et al. The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:197–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Huntington SE, Burns RM, Harding-Esch E, et al. Modelling-based evaluation of the costs, benefits and cost-effectiveness of multipathogen point-of-care tests for sexually transmitted infections in symptomatic genitourinary medicine clinic attendees. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lee K, You S, Li Y, et al. Estimation of the lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost due to syphilis acquired in the United States in 2018. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:e810–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gülmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006; 6:177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Brunham RC, Binns B, Guijon F, et al. Etiology and outcome of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. J Infect Dis 1988; 158:510–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Barrett S, Taylor C. A review on pelvic inflammatory disease. Int J STD AIDS 2005; 16:715–20; quiz 721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Washington AE. Assessing risk for pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae. JAMA 1991; 266:2581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Tu FF, As-Sanie S. Chronic pelvic pain in adult females: treatment.https://www.uptodate.com/contents/chronic-pelvic-pain-in-adult-females-treatment#H780919019. Accessed 16 March 2022.
- 37. Christianson M, Boman J, Essén B. ‘Let men into the pregnancy’—men's perceptions about being tested for chlamydia and HIV during pregnancy. Midwifery 2013; 29:351–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Gift TL, Gaydos CA, Kent CK, et al. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:S66–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gift TL, Blake DR, Gaydos CA, Marrazzo JM. The cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:S51–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Schwebke JR, Desmond RA. A randomized controlled trial of partner notification methods for prevention of trichomoniasis in women. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:392–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Golden MR, Kerani RP, Stenger M, et al. Uptake and population-level impact of expedited partner therapy (EPT) on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: the Washington State community-level randomized trial of EPT. PLoS Med 2015; 12:e1001777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Golden MR, Whittington WLH, Handsfield HH, et al. Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:676–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Haagsma JA, Polinder S, Cassini A, Colzani E, Havelaar AH. Review of disability weight studies: comparison of methodological choices and values. Popul Health Metr 2014; 12:20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Tang W, Mao J, Li KT, et al. Pregnancy and fertility-related adverse outcomes associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2020; 96:322–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Bautista CT, Hollingsworth BP, Sanchez JL. Repeat chlamydia diagnoses increase the hazard of pelvic inflammatory disease among US army women: a retrospective cohort analysis. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45:770–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






