SUMMARY
Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the only approved Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTb) vaccine, providing limited durable protection when administered intradermally. However, recent work revealed intravenous (IV) BCG administration yielded greater protection in macaques. Here, we perform a dose-ranging study of IV BCG vaccination in macaques to generate a range of immune responses and define correlates of protection. 17 of 34 macaques had no detectable infection. Multivariate analysis incorporating longitudinal cellular and humoral immune parameters uncovered an extensive and highly coordinated immune response from the bronchoaveolar lavage (BAL). A minimal signature predicting protection contained four BAL immune features, of which three remained significant after dose correction: frequency of CD4 T cells producing TNF with IFNγ, those producing TNF with IL-17, and the number of NK cells. Blood immune features were less predictive of protection. We conclude that CD4 T cell immunity and NK cells in the airway correlate with protection following IV BCG.
eTOC blurb
Vaccination with intravenous BCG protects macaques from tuberculosis. Using a dose-ranging IV BCG strategy, Darrah et al. elicited graded immune responses and 50% protection in macaques. Multivariate analysis of longitudinal cellular and humoral parameters identified antigen-specific CD4 T cells and NK cells in the airway as strong correlates of protection.
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of death from infection worldwide, and up to 25% of the world’s population has asymptomatic Mtb infection (latent TB infection, LTBI) which can reactivate and cause transmissible pulmonary TB disease. Treatment for active TB requires lengthy drug regimens that can lead to limited compliance, and an increasing prevalence of drug-resistant TB complicates therapy. The only approved vaccine, live-attenuated BCG (Bacille Calmette-Guerin), was developed 100 years ago and is administered intradermally (ID) at birth in most TB-endemic countries. While ID BCG reduces the incidence of disseminated TB in infancy and early childhood, it has limited durable protection against pulmonary TB in adolescents and adults1. As pulmonary TB accounts for most of the morbidity, mortality and transmission, a major goal is to limit pulmonary TB disease in adolescents and adults.
Mtb is transmitted by the aerosol route and initiates infection in alveolar macrophages. Antibodies could limit early Mtb replication within macrophages or modulate immune responses to Mtb2. Once infection is established, however, T cell immunity is required to control replication and limit TB disease and reactivation. Experiments have shown that CD4 T cells, IFNγ, and TNF are important for protection by vaccines3. These data are substantiated in humans with genetic deficiencies of IFNγ and IL-12 signaling and in those treated with biologics that neutralize TNF4,5. TB is the major cause of death in HIV infected individuals, which is associated with a loss of CD4 responses. Other immune cells implicated in TB immunity in animal models include CD4 Th17 cells, CD8 T cells, and donor unrestricted cells such as γδ T cells, MAIT cells, and NK cells6. Until recently7–10, there have been no pre-clinical vaccine models that show high level protection against TB infection or disease, which are important for defining correlates and mechanisms for preventing infection.
We previously showed that IV BCG immunization protected 9 of 10 rhesus macaques against mTb challenge, which contrasted to limited protection afforded by ID or aerosol BCG administered at the same dose7. Of note, 6 of the 9 protected animals had no detectable Mtb post challenge suggesting that IV BCG could mediate sterilizing protection. Thus, IV BCG provides a model to define immune correlates of protection for prevention of infection and disease. Analysis of BAL and lung tissue after IV BCG revealed a substantial increase in antigen-specific CD4+ T cells with a unique Th1/Th17 transcriptional signature7. Additionally, IV BCG elicited antigen-specific CD8 T cells as well as broad IgG, IgA, and IgM antibody responses7,11. However, since 90% of IV BCG-immunized animals were protected against disease, we were unable to discern innate, cellular, or humoral correlates of protection amongst these animals. Thus, it remains to be determined which among these possibilities might be the strongest correlates.
Here, we performed a dose-ranging study of IV BCG in rhesus macaques, hypothesizing that we would generate a wide range of immune responses and protective outcomes facilitating immune correlates analysis. We assessed a large number of innate, cellular, and humoral immune responses over time after vaccination and used multivariate modeling to identify correlates of protection from blood and BAL samples. We pre-specified four immune measurements to query as prognostic correlates of protection, i.e., the number and frequency of antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells in BAL (airway). In addition, we performed an extensive exploratory multivariate analysis encompassing a wide range of immune phenotypes and functions. We show that adaptive cellular immune correlates of protection are preferentially defined in the airway (the site of infection) compared to the blood. In a separate analysis (Cell Reports Medicine, submitted), Liu et al. analyzed the blood-derived transcriptomics from the same study, and discovered an early innate signature that predicted the generation of adaptive BAL immune features associated with protection, as well as protection directly. These data will direct future vaccine designs to elicit such lung-localized adaptive immune responses and guide the analysis of clinical trials aimed at eliciting protection against TB.
RESULTS
Experimental design and safety
This study was designed to determine the immune correlates of IV BCG-mediated protection against TB in rhesus macaques by using a range of BCG doses to achieve 50% protective efficacy–which is optimal for correlates analysis. 34 rhesus macaques were immunized with IV BCG; we administered approximately half-log decreasing doses between a highly protective dose of 2.5 × 107 (7.4 log10) and 3.9 × 104 (4.6 log10) CFU (Figure S1A). This study (with varied group sizes) was not designed to perform detailed statistical comparisons between dose groups, but rather to use different doses to generate a range of immune responses and protection. Immune responses in blood and BAL were assessed up to 24 weeks following immunization, after which animals were challenged with Mtb Erdman (4 – 17 CFU) and monitored for TB disease using PET CT imaging (Figure S1B). Necropsies were done 12 weeks post-challenge or when animals had substantial disease determined by PET CT scans or clinical signs, reaching humane endpoints. A complete summary of all animals used in this study, along with doses of BCG and Mtb administered, is shown in (Table S1).
To assess safety, plasma cytokines, C-reactive protein (CRP), and clinical parameters (temperature, weight, complete blood counts and serum chemistries) were measured after IV BCG administration (Figure S2). Serum proteins associated with inflammation and Th1 T cell induction, including IL-8, sCD40L, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-12, and IL-18, but also anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and IL-1RA, were increased between 6 hours and 7 days after vaccination and were largely influenced by BCG dose (Figure S2A). Neutrophil and monocyte counts, as well as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) were transiently increased at 6 hours after vaccination while CRP was elevated for 7–14 days at higher IV BCG doses before returning to normal (Figure S2B). No increases in temperature were observed.
Leukocyte composition in BAL and blood after IV BCG vaccination
Previously, vaccination with a high dose (~7.6 log10 CFU) of IV BCG resulted in a large and sustained influx of T cells into the BAL7. Here, following IV BCG, the median influx of T cells, B cells, and NK cells into the BAL was dose-responsive (Figure 1A). Animals vaccinated with the lowest doses of IV BCG displayed no detectable changes in BAL leukocyte numbers (Figure S4A). In contrast and consistent with our prior data, higher doses of IV BCG (6.0 – 7.5 log10 CFU) resulted in 10- to 30-fold increases in CD4 and CD8 T cells--substantially altering the proportions of T cells and macrophages in the BAL (Figures 1B and S4B) for at least 12 weeks after vaccination. Transient increases in the absolute numbers (Figure 1A) and proportions (Figures 1C and S4C) of donor-unrestricted T cells (i.e., Vγ9+ γδ T cells and MAIT cells) were observed in BAL 2 to 4 weeks after vaccination, in a dose-dependent manner.
Figure 1. Serial assessment of total cells and antigen-specific T cells in BAL after varied IV BCG vaccination doses.
Rhesus macaques were vaccinated with half-log increasing doses of IV BCG between 4.5 and 7.5 log10 CFU; binned dose groups (with number of animals per bin) are color coded. BAL was collected before (Pre; P) and 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after vaccination.
(A) Geometric mean number (log10) of total cells (live, nucleated cell counts) or selected leukocyte subsets (identified by flow cytometry) in the BAL before and after IV BCG are shown for each binned dose group. See also Figure S3 and S4A.
(B and C) Average proportions of indicated live leukocyte (B) or CD3+ T cell (C) subset in BAL for animals in each dose group at 2 – 4 weeks after IV BCG. See also Figures S4B and S4C. (D) Number (log10) of memory CD4 (top) or CD8 (bottom) T cells in BAL producing IFNγ, IL2, TNF, or IL-17 following in vitro stimulation with mycobacterial antigens (purified protein derivative; PPD) as identified by flow cytometry. Shown are individual (thin grey lines) and median (thick colored lines) responses for macaques in each dose group before and after IV BCG. See also Figure S6 and S7.
A more extensive longitudinal flow cytometric analysis of leukocyte composition was assessed from PBMC (Figure S5). Although the overall proportion of total T cells was not affected following IV BCG vaccination (Figure S4D), the proportions of CD3+ T cells that were Vγ9+ γδ T cells and MAIT cells increased with higher IV BCG doses between 2 and 4 weeks after vaccination (Figure S4E). In general, the pattern of immune alterations following IV BCG were dose-dependent and more profound in BAL than the blood.
Antigen-specific T cell responses in BAL and blood after IV BCG
A primary goal in this study was to generate quantitatively or qualitatively different immune responses across animals by varying the vaccine dose. The magnitude and quality of T cell cytokine responses following ex vivo restimulation with mycobacterial antigens (tuberculin purified protein derivative; PPD) were assessed in BAL. We identified antigen-specific T cells producing any combination of IFNγ, IL-2, TNF, or IL-17–the canonical Th1/Th17 associated cytokines shown to be important for protection against TB in various animal models and humans6,8,12–20. Macaques from all dose groups generated antigen-specific CD4 T cells in BAL that generally peaked between 8 and 12 weeks after vaccination (Figures 1D and S7A). Depending on the IV BCG dose, CD4 T cell responses in the BAL increased 10- to 1000-fold in number (Figure 1D) following vaccination, yielding peak IFNγ or TNF frequencies of ~60% of all memory CD4 T cells (Figure S7A). Cytokine-producing CD8 T cells in the BAL were lower and more variable in both number and frequency than CD4 T cells, particularly at the lower IV BCG doses (Figures 1D and S7D).
Although the absolute frequencies of cytokine-positive T cells in the BAL varied with BCG dose (Figures S7A and S7D), qualitatively, the relative proportions of IFNγ, IL-2, or TNF production (in any combination) by CD4 (Figure S7B) or CD8 (Figure S7E) T cells was similar across IV BCG doses. Compared to the frequencies of canonical CD4 Th1 cytokines (IFNγ, TNF, or IL-2), IL-17 production was substantially lower (Figures S7A and S7C), comprising ≤10% of the total peak CD4 T cell response (Figure S7B, black pie arcs). The profile of IFNγ, IL-2, and TNF expression by IL-17+ versus IL-17- CD4 T cells was similar (Figure S7C, pies).
For analysis of antigen-specific T cell responses in PBMCs, we applied a more extensive flow cytometry panel (Figure S8) that measured IFNγ, IL-2, TNF, and IL-17 production as well as additional T cell markers, including the activation-induced markers CD154 and CD153, and the cytotoxic markers CD107a and granzyme B. While all IV BCG dose groups had detectable CD4 and CD8 T responses to mycobacterial antigens (Mtb whole cell lysate; WCL), the magnitude of responses in PBMC (Figures 2A and S9A) was far lower than that measured in BAL (Figure S7A). CD4 T cells from PBMC of matched dose groups produced similar frequencies of IFNγ, TNF, and CD154 but comparatively lower frequencies of IL-2, CD153, and IL-17 (Figure S9A). Like the BAL, the quality of the CD4 T cell cytokine response (proportion of cells producing any combination of CD154, IFNγ, IL-2, TNF, or IL-17) in PBMC was similar across IV BCG dose groups (Figure S9C). Essentially all cytokine-producing cells expressed CD154, a sensitive marker of antigen-specific CD4 T cell activation. CD8 T cells and Vγ9+ γδ T cells produced mainly IFNγ and TNF following stimulation (Figures S9D, S9F, and S9G), and a higher proportion of the cytolytic markers CD107a and granzyme B compared to CD4 T cells (Figures S9B, S9E, and S9H). PBMC IFNγ ELISpots against mycobacterial antigens (culture filtrate protein; CFP), which may represent CD4 or CD8 T cells, also showed a dose-dependent response at the time of challenge (Figure 2B).
Figure 2. Mycobacterial-specific T cell responses in PBMC after varied IV BCG vaccination doses.
(A) Frequency of memory CD4 (top) or CD8 (bottom) T cells in PBMC producing IFNγ, IL-2, TNF, or IL-17 following in vitro stimulation with mycobacterial antigens (whole cell lysate; WCL) as identified by flow cytometry. Shown are individual (thin grey lines) and median (thick colored lines) responses for macaques in each IV BCG binned dose group before (Pre, P) and 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after IV BCG. See also Figure S8.
(B) Number of IFNγ spot forming units (SFU) per 200,000 cells in each dose group following stimulation of PBMC with mycobacterial antigens (culture filtrate protein, CFP) at the time of Mtb challenge (24 weeks); symbols represent individual animals and lines are medians.
Antigen-specific antibody responses in blood and BAL after IV BCG
Prior studies demonstrated that high-dose IV BCG vaccination induced mycobacterial-specific antibody responses and that IgM titers in BAL and plasma were associated with protection11. Hence, we next sought to define the influence of IV BCG dose on humoral immunity. IgG1, IgA, and IgM antibody titers to two mycobacterial antigens (lipoarabinomannan; LAM, and PPD) were evaluated longitudinally before and after BCG immunization in plasma and BAL using a custom Luminex assay (Figure 3)21.
Figure 3. Mycobacterial-specific antibody responses in blood and BAL after varied IV BCG doses.
(A–B) Heatmaps of lipoarabinomannan (LAM)- (A) and PPD- (B) specific IgG1, IgA, and IgM antibody titers in the plasma of individual macaques (ordered by binned dose group) following IV BCG vaccination and Mtb challenge (24 weeks).
(D–E) Heatmaps of LAM- (D) and PPD- (E) specific IgG1, IgA, and IgM antibody titers in the BAL after IV BCG. Titers (average of duplicate samples) are shown as the log2 fold change in Luminex MFI over the pre-vaccination (Pre) level.
(C–F) Correlation matrices including IV BCG dose and each antibody measurement in the plasma (C) and BAL (F). Positive correlations are red; negative correlations are blue. Values represent the Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Ellipses have their eccentricity parametrically scaled to the strength of the relationship with statistical significance (unadjusted p-value) indicated: < 0.05 (*), < 0.01 (**), < 0.001 (**), < 0.0001 (***), < 0.00001 (****).
In plasma (Figure 3A–3C), LAM-specific IgG1, IgA, and IgM titers peaked 4 weeks after vaccination and, in some animals that received high-dose IV BCG, remained elevated until the time of Mtb challenge (24 weeks). Conversely, LAM-specific antibody titers from macaques in lower BCG dose groups waned over time (Figure 3A). PPD-specific antibody titers in plasma were modest overall with IgG1 titers that peaked 4 weeks after BCG (Figure 3B). LAM-specific IgG1 and IgM and PPD-specific IgM titers in plasma correlated with IV BCG dose (Figure 3C), indicating the potential for using select humoral measurements in the periphery as markers of IV BCG vaccination dose.
Antibody profiling in BAL fluid (Figure 3D–3F) revealed increases in LAM-specific IgG1, IgA and IgM at 4 weeks that persisted up to 12 weeks following immunization in macaques from higher IV BCG dose groups (Figure 3D). PPD-specific antibody responses emerged 4 weeks following vaccination in higher dose groups but were relatively low (Figure 3E). Animals in the lower BCG dose groups displayed minimal antibody responses to LAM or PPD in BAL. BAL antibody measurements were strongly co-correlated (Figure 3F), indicating a coordinated humoral immune response in the airway triggered by IV BCG vaccination. As a result (and in contrast to plasma), every antibody feature from BAL correlated with IV BCG dose (Figure 3F). Together, these data demonstrate that IV BCG drives dose-dependent increases in LAM-specific IgG1 and LAM- and PPD-specific IgM in the periphery and at site of infection.
Protection against Mtb challenge following IV BCG vaccination
Six months after IV BCG immunization, macaques were challenged with a low dose (4 to 17 CFU) of Mtb Erdman. We pre-specified an endpoint of 12 weeks post-challenge, at which time animals underwent necropsy and extensive pathology and immune analysis (Figure S1B). TB disease was tracked longitudinally using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET CT imaging; total FDG activity is a measure of cellular metabolism and inflammation that correlates with total thoracic Mtb burden22,23. As early as 4 weeks post-challenge, FDG activity in lungs was increased in the unvaccinated control and in one or more animals from each of the lowest four IV BCG dose groups (log10 4.5 – 6.5) (Figure 4A). Throughout the entire post-challenge phase, 11 of 34 vaccinated macaques had measurable lung FDG activity, while 23 macaques, including all animals in the two highest dose groups (log10 6.5 – 7.5), had none (Figures 4A–C). Although not all vaccinated macaques had granulomas observed by CT or found at necropsy, those macaques who had measurable lung FDG activity also had lung granulomas (Figure 4A). While an axial view of scans is used to quantify FDG and identify granulomas, three-dimensional reconstructions of pre-necropsy PET CT scans provide a visual representation of TB disease in each macaque (Figure 4B).
Figure 4. Outcomes of Mtb infection after varied IV BCG vaccination doses.
(A) Lung inflammation (FDG activity) and number of lung granulomas over the course of infection measured by monthly PET CT scans for each macaque in each binned IV BCG dose group. Lines connect the same animal over time.
(B) Three-dimensional volume renderings of PET CT scans of the thoracic cavity of each macaque, arranged by dose group, just prior to necropsy. Areas of increasing orange/red coloring indicate FDG retention. TNTC, too numerous to count.
(C) Total lung FDG activity from pre-necropsy scan.
(D-H) Outcome data from necropsy: number of lung granulomas found at necropsy (D); total gross pathology score (E); pathology scores for lung (F), lymph node (G) and extra-pulmonary tissues (H). Dashed line in (E) and (G) is assumed normal pathology score accounting for variability in thoracic lymph node size in healthy rhesus macaques. Symbols represent individual macaques. Data points within grey areas are zero. Open black symbols indicate unvaccinated (Unvax) historical controls7. TNTC, too numerous to count. Nonparametric bivariate correlations between outcomes and dose shown with Kendall’s τ and corresponding p-value (blue).
The infection outcome measures at necropsy of lung inflammation (Figure 4C), number of granulomas (Figure 4D), total pathology score (Figure 4E), and lung pathology score (Figure 4F) show a moderate negative correlation with IV BCG dose (Kendall’s τ and corresponding p value) indicating that IV BCG dose influences protection against Mtb infection and disease. Lymph node pathology (Figure 4G) and extrapulmonary (Figure 4H) score were not significantly correlated with dose. At the highest dose (log10 7 – 7.5), these outcome measures were consistent with our previous study using a similar dose7. Detailed necropsies revealed some sign of infection (i.e., one or more lung or lymph node granulomas) in at least one animal in each dose group (Figures 4D and 4G), with more animals showing TB-related pathology at the lower IV BCG doses.
The pre-defined primary outcome measure of protection was a comprehensive quantification of Mtb burden (CFU) at necropsy. All lung granulomas, other areas of lung pathology, all thoracic lymph nodes, and half of each grossly uninvolved lung were individually collected using the pre-necropsy PET CT scan as a map of disease. Total thoracic CFU is the sum of all samples, reflecting a true thoracic bacterial burden for each animal. For three vaccinated animals with extensive disease, the total thoracic CFU was estimated using total FDG activity in lung immediately prior to necropsy rather than by detailed necropsy (star-shaped symbols, Figure 5A). In most cases, macaques with lung CFU also had Mtb in the thoracic lymph nodes (Figures 5B and 5C). One animal in the highest BCG dose group (log10 7–7.5) had <100 CFU in total (from a thoracic lymph node), while the three other animals in this dose group were sterile. Although there was a clear vaccine dose effect on total thoracic CFU (τ = −0.3585, p=0.0066), at least one animal from each IV BCG dose group had no detectable Mtb in the thoracic cavity, i.e., sterilizing immunity (Figure 5A). In summary, 17 of 34 animals across all doses showed sterilizing immunity (0 Mtb CFU), and 18 of 34 were considered protected (<100 Mtb CFU).
Figure 5. Mtb bacterial burdens after infection of IV BCG vaccinated macaques.
(A–C), Mtb bacterial burden (CFU) from the thoracic cavity of rhesus macaques necropsied 12 weeks post-challenge; total thoracic (A), lungs (B), or thoracic lymph nodes (C). Open symbols represent historical unvaccinated controls7 and star-shaped symbols indicate predicted total thoracic CFU based on total thoracic lung inflammation from PET-CT23. Data points within grey areas are zero. Sterility was defined 0 thoracic CFU while protection was defined as <100 thoracic CFU. Nonparametric bivariate correlations between outcomes and dose (Kendall’s τ and corresponding p-value).
(D) PBMC IFNγ ELISpots to antigens present in Mtb but not BCG (ESAT-6 and CFP-10). Lines shows individual macaques over time for each binned dose group. Dashed horizonal line represents the cut-off below which at least 95% of uninfected animals fall. See also Figure S10A.
(E) Percentage of sterile or non-sterile macaques either positive or negative by ELISpot. Fisher’s exact test p-value (two-sided).
Interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) as a measure of Mtb infection
As commonly used to detect TB infection in humans, we performed a blood-based Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) using Mtb-specific antigens that are not present in BCG (ESAT-6 and CFP-10). Thus, to provide an orthogonal assessment of infection with a translatable clinical test, we assessed Mtb infection by IFNγ ELISpot prior to challenge and at the time of necropsy (12 weeks post-Mtb) (Figure 5D). In this analysis, we categorized animals as sterile or non-sterile based on Mtb CFU at necropsy and defined positive ELISpot responses as >10 spot-forming units (SFU) per 200,000 PBMC (Figure S10A). The ELISpot assay was accurate at predicting infection (Figure 5E): of macaques with ESAT-6 + CFP-10 responses <10 SFU, 86.7% were sterile, while 13.3% animals were incorrectly identified as non-sterile. In macaques with >10 SFU, 78.9% were non-sterile and 21.1% were sterile. Thus, for total thoracic sterility, the IFNγ ELISpot assay had a sensitivity (ability to detect infected macaques) of 88.2% and specificity (ability to detect uninfected macaques) of 76.5%. These data have implications for interpreting IGRAs as a diagnostic marker of human Mtb infection. A similar analysis was done using lung and lung lymph node sterility (Figure S10B). Flow cytometry assays using ESAT-6 and CFP-10 peptide stimulations of PBMC before and after Mtb challenge largely corroborated the ELISpot data with slightly lower sensitivity (Figure S10C).
IV BCG-elicited antigen-specific CD4 T cells in airways correlate with protection.
In this study, we pre-specified a statistical analysis plan that included four immune features as primary potential correlates of protection: the number and frequency of mycobacterial-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells in airways (BAL). At the study end, we performed a logistic regression analysis (Table S2) using each of these four immunological parameters with protection (defined as <100 total thoracic Mtb CFU). Independent of IV BCG dose, the frequency and number of stimulated CD4 T cells producing any combination of IFNγ, IL-2, TNF, or IL-17 in the BAL were significant predictors of protection (p = 0.0095 and p = 0.0074). For each 1% increase in frequency or 10-fold increase in number of antigen-specific CD4 T cells, the odds of protection increased by 27% (odds ratio of 1.2659) or 78-fold (odds ratio of 78.0348), respectively. Neither the frequency nor number of cytokine-producing CD8 T cells significantly predicted protection when controlling for IV BCG dose.
Multivariate signatures more broadly correlate with IV BCG-elicited protection.
Because we assessed a broad array of cellular and humoral immune features longitudinally throughout the vaccination phase (Table S3), we sought to evaluate correlates of protection comprising multiple features using mathematical frameworks that accommodate the natural co-variation among them. Accordingly, we constructed computational models aiming to predict challenge outcomes from multi-feature signatures.
For each of the 18 protected macaques and 16 unprotected macaques (Figure 6A), we calculated the normalized area under the curve (nAUC) for each measured immune response feature as a simplification of the temporal dynamics after IV BCG (0 to 12 weeks), resulting in 68 nAUC measurements from BAL (Figure S11A). Our first multivariate modeling approach evaluated the classification performance based on all measured BAL features concomitantly to provide a more integrative understanding of the IV BCG-elicited cellular and humoral responses beyond those revealed by univariate comparative statistics. Specifically, we used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) feature selection24 to select a minimal representative set of immune features from all available BAL measurements, followed by classification of Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLSDA) (Figures 6B and 6C). LASSO/PLSDA analysis discriminated protected from non-protected animals using the IV BCG-induced immune response in BAL (Figure 6B). Four immune features from BAL were selected by LASSO as a minimal set that, together, predict protection: frequency of (PPD-specific) CD4 memory T cells producing IFNγ and TNF but not IL-2 or IL-17 ((L)%CD4:G+2–17-T+); frequency of CD4 memory T cells producing IL-17 and TNF but not IFNγ or IL-2 ((L)%CD4:G-2–17+T+); number of NK cells ((L)#NK); and the PPD-specific IgA titer ((L)IgA(PPD) (Figure 6C). Model accuracy was significant (p < 0.01) relative to random permutation of outcome categories (Figure 6G), and the predictive sensitivity and specificity (confusion matrix) was strong (Matthews correlation coefficient [MCC)] = 0.73; Figure 6H). Consistent with this minimal model, univariate analyses of these four selected features showed significant enrichment in protected compared to unprotected macaques (Figure 6D). To further probe the BAL immune profiles of IV BCG-induced longitudinal immune features between the protected and unprotected outcome groups, the mean percentile of each measurement was determined for both groups (Figure 6E). The polar area charts reveal that the protected group exhibited higher values of most feature categories from BAL including antibody titers, cell types present and T cells with different expressed cytokines combinations. To gain insights into coordinated immune system processes represented by this model that differentiate protected versus unprotected groups, we built a correlation network connecting the LASSO-selected BAL features with other measured BAL features highly co-correlated with them (Figure 6F). This produced a substantial network comprising multiple additional features highly correlated with the four LASSO-selected features, e.g., including: CD4 T cells expressing a wider range of cytokine profiles (IFNγ, IL-2, TNF, IL17, or IL-21); CD8 T cells expressing IFNγ, TNF or IL-21; Vγ9 and MAIT cells; and a spectrum of antibody titers (IgG, IgA, IgM) specific for LAM, WCL or PPD. It should be noted that the pre-specified features shown as significant correlates in the logistic regression model described above ((L)%CD4:AnyG2T17, (L)#CD4:AnyG2T17) appear in this correlation network.
Figure 6. Selected immune parameters from BAL distinguish protection in IV BCG vaccinated macaques.
(A–D) PLSDA following LASSO was applied to identify immune features in BAL (L, lung) that distinguish protected and unprotected animals. (A) Animals with <100 total thoracic Mtb CFU (n=18) were defined as protected (Yes, orange). (B) The PLSDA scores plot shows the degree of discrimination between protected and unprotected animals following LASSO feature selection; symbols represent individual macaques, and ellipses indicate 95% confidence regions assuming a multivariate t distribution. (C) VIP (variable importance in projection) scores of the 4 LASSO-selected features that together discriminate protection. (D) Univariate box plots show the distribution of each selected feature in protected or unprotected animals. Boxes show IQR (interquartile range) with median (line) and whiskers (1.5*IQR). * p < 0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001, **** p < 0.0001 (Wilcoxin).
(E) Polar plots depict the mean percentile of each measurement across the protected and the unprotected groups. Wedge distance from center depicts the mean percentile from 0 – 0.75 with a step of 0.25.
(F) A correlation network shows the immune features (grey nodes) that are significantly co-correlated (p < 0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction; Spearman’s > 0.7) with model-selected features (orange nodes) from panel (C). See also Table S3.
(G–H) Model performance and robustness are validated with permutation testing and confusion matrix. (G) The violin plot shows the distributions of repeated classification accuracy testing using label permutation (two-sided p-value). Black squares show median accuracy and black lines represent one SD. (H) Average confusion matrix of the PLSDA model with Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).
To further substantiate these results, we incorporated data from an additional 10 rhesus macaques (n = 9 with Mtb CFU <100) that were vaccinated with high-dose IV BCG (>7.5 log10 CFU) in a previous study7 and assessed the performance of our modeling approach using 54 immune measurements from BAL that overlapped between the two studies (Figure S12). Similar results were obtained, with the LASSO/PLSDA model obtaining the same four minimal features selected in the initial analysis above along with two additional: the numbers of CD4 and CD8 T cells expressing TNF and IFNγ ((L)#CD4:G+2–17-T+; (L)#CD8:G+2–17-T+) – both of which were found present in the foundational correlation network (Figure 6F). While the foundational and extended (Figure S12E) correlation networks cannot easily be rigorously compared because the former includes features absent in the latter, we found 21 nodes in common (out of 35 from the foundational network). Moreover, numerous other features, mainly immune cell types, are the same in both networks (although some being associated with cell numbers versus percentages). Thus, our multivariate approach is consistent across the combination of previous and new cohorts.
Since blood is the most accessible compartment from which to measure immune responses and define correlates of protection in human studies, we also evaluated longitudinal (0 to 24 weeks) immune data from the PBMC and plasma after IV BCG. First, we applied our LASSO/PLSDA procedure with correlation network analysis as above to 83 nAUC measurements derived from blood, including antibody titers and cytokines from plasma as well flow cytometry data encompassing cellular composition and antigen-specific T cell responses (Figure S11). We again observed separation between the protected and unprotected animals, albeit with significantly less specificity in blood compared to BAL (MCC = 0.68 for PBMC compared to 0.73 for BAL; p < 0.0001) (Figures S11B and S11H). In blood, separation was based on six selected features enriched in the protection group, namely plasma sCD40L and IL-8, cytokine-positive (Any) CD8 T cells also positive for granzyme B or CD107a, cytokine-producing CD4 effector memory T cells, and cytokine-positive Vγ9 T cells positive for CD107a (Figure S11C). Again, these selected features demonstrated significant univariate differences between the two outcome groups (Figure S11D) and many measurements were enriched in the protected group based on the mean percentile quantitation (Figure S11E). Correlation network modeling revealed only two sparse networks (Figure S11F): a cluster of Vγ9 T cells expressing TNF or CD107a, and a network of CD4 T cells expressing CD154 and various cytokines (IFNγ, TNF, granzyme B). These data suggest that antigen-responsive Vγ9 T cell and CD4 T cells in blood may be associated with the separation between protected and unprotected animals. Overall, a much less extensive set of immune system processes differentiating protection was found from blood measurements compared to those from the BAL.
Multivariate cellular immune signature after correction for IV BCG dose effects.
The IV BCG vaccination dose correlated with total Mtb CFU post-challenge (Figure 5A) as well as most humoral and cellular immune measurements in BAL and blood (Figure 7A). Thus, it was useful to include dose as an explicit covariate in our multivariate modeling. We employed a nested mixed linear modeling approach to evaluate immune response features with respect to association with protection status while controlling for the effects of IV BCG dose (as well as animal vaccination cohort). T values (normalized coefficients) of the protected group variable in the full model were calculated to quantify the magnitude of the IV BCG dose effect. Altogether, the measurements significantly associated with the protected group were defined as having a T value >2 and a two-sided LRT p-value <0.05 in BAL (Figure 7B) and blood (Figure 7C). We observed that the only features that significantly differed between the two protection outcomes were enriched in the protected group, and that there were a greater number of immune features from BAL compared to blood that were enriched with protection (consistent with our PLSDA modeling results). In BAL (Figure 7B), three of the four LASSO-selected features (Figure 6C) remained significant after dose correction: the frequencies of CD4 T cells producing IFNγ and TNF or IL-17 and TNF ((L)%CD4:G+2–17-T+, (L)%CD4:G-2–17+T+) and the number of NK cells ((L)#NK). Of note, the immune features that most strongly associated with protection in the BAL were the number of CD4 T cells producing any combination of IFNγ, IL-2, TNF, or IL17 ((L)#CD4:AnyG2T17) and the number of CD4 T cells producing IFNγ with or without other cytokines ((L)#CD4:G). In blood (Figure 7C), only one of the six LASSO-selected features (Figure S11C) remained significant after dose correction: plasma levels of sCD40L. These findings confirm that our PLSDA models are not exclusively dominated by IV BCG dose; and that the frequency and number of mycobacterial-specific CD4 T cells in the BAL are significant correlates of protection, independent of BCG dose.
Figure 7. Immune features in BAL and blood associate with protection after controlling for IV BCG dose.
(A) Spearman’s correlation between each immune measurement in BAL (L, lung) or blood (P, PBMC or plasma) and IV BCG dose. Adjusted p values after Benjamini-Hochberg correction (* p < 0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
(B and C) A nested mixed linear model was created for each immune measurement with and without a variable accounting for the animals’ protection group. The volcano plot shows the T-value (normalized coefficient) of protection incorporated in the mixed linear model (x-axis) vs the p-value of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) for the model fit difference between the two nested models (y-axis) using BAL- (B) and blood- (C) derived measurements. Positive T-values represent features enriched in the protected group. See also Table S3.
DISCUSSION
Defining vaccine-elicited immune correlates of protection will facilitate TB vaccine development by informing vaccine trial design and providing rationale for selecting vaccine formulations or regimens that elicit a protective response. Additionally, correlates of protection can guide deeper investigation of mechanisms of protection. Nonhuman primates are a predictive model for evaluating vaccines against various infectious diseases as they recapitulate the innate and adaptive immune features elicited in humans following vaccination. Moreover, the model allows for longitudinal sampling of BAL and blood, providing data on whether tissue- and blood-derived correlates might be distinct. The finding that high-dose IV BCG-vaccination can prevent TB infection in macaques makes this a valuable preclinical model for defining correlates and mechanisms of protection.
A unique feature of this study is that all animals received the same vaccine (IV BCG), while the dose was varied to achieve a range of immune responses and disparate outcomes. We observed 53% overall protection (18 of 34), with 17 animals showing sterile protection. Collectively, we assessed many immune variables, including innate, humoral, and cellular measures in blood and BAL to capture a broad array of potential correlates of protection, and then employed an integrative multivariate modeling approach which incorporates the observed co-variation among immune features to produce latent variables that correlate with protection. In our statistical analysis plan, we pre-specified four immune measurements as primary correlates and found that two, the frequency and number of antigen-specific CD4 T cells in the BAL were significant correlates of protection, independent of BCG dose. Post-hoc multivariate analysis of blood- and BAL-derived immune features substantiated the correlation of Th1/Th17 cytokine-producing CD4 T cells in the BAL and identified NK cells and other CD8-expressing cells in BAL in an immune network of protection against TB.
Recently, Dijkman et al. showed protection against repeated limiting dose Mtb challenge in macaques that were vaccinated with BCG directly into lung by bronchoscopic instillation8. Mucosally vaccinated animals generated robust CD4 T cell responses in BAL, with polyfunctional Th17 cells correlating with protection. In addition, IgA titers in BAL fluid and IL-10 production from restimulated BAL cells also correlated with protection. Notably, the identified correlates were found from BAL and not in blood measurements. An earlier study by Sharpe et al., in which NHP were vaccinated with BCG intradermally, also identified a Th1/Th17 signature in the blood of vaccinated animals17. Further, in a latency model, CD4 Th1 cells expressing IL-17 and IL-10 were present at higher levels in granulomas that controlled infection12. Finally, in a rhesus latency model using the low virulence Mtb strain (CDC1551) for infection, mucosal CXCR3+CCR6+ CD4 Th1/Th17 cells appeared early in the BAL, but not blood, and corresponded to asymptomatic infection and lower Mtb burdens in the lung16. Collectively, these macaque studies with BCG vaccination or Mtb infection highlight the importance of measuring airway responses to define correlates of protection. In addition, they provide mounting evidence pointing to lung-localized adaptive immunity as a causal mediator of protection.
Here, we applied LASSO to our large array of immune measurements to select the most parsimonious set of variables. For BAL measurements, a resulting minimal model exhibiting statistical significance and strong predictive capability comprised only four features: frequency of CD4 T cells producing IFNγ and TNF but not IL-2 or IL-17; frequency of CD4 T cells producing IL-17 and TNF but not IFNγ or IL-2; the absolute number of NK cells; and the PPD-specific IgA titer. The first three of these remained significant after employing a mixed linear model that accounted for strong IV BCG vaccine dose effects. An analogous multivariate model based on immune features measured in blood was far less effective at discriminating protection.
We next sought interpretation of the broader immune processes represented by this multivariate signature by constructing a correlation network model incorporating a wider set of features that strongly co-varied with the minimal set. Although LASSO selected BAL CD4 T cells that produced either IFNγ and TNF, or IL-17 and TNF, for the minimal PLSDA model, CD4 T cells that produced most other combinations of IFNγ, IL-2, TNF, and IL-17 were highly co-correlated, indicating that their capability to predict protection was nearly as strong as the LASSO-selected features themselves. Thus, discrimination between protected and unprotected animals does not appear to be exclusively limited to a specific Th1 or Th17 cytokine combination, but rather a coordinated response involving diverse T cell functions. Our results here differ from Dijkman et al, who found that the quadruple-positive (IFNγ+IL-2+TNF+IL-17+) subset of BCG-specific BAL CD4 T cells correlated with protection, along with IgA in the airway and IL-10 from restimulated BAL cells8. In our study, IL-10 was not measured from BAL cells, and plasma levels of IL-10 after IV BCG did not correlate with protection; furthermore, while we observed an initial correlation between antibody titers and protection, these measures were not significant following dose correction. Nevertheless, the finding that antigen-specific CD4 Th1/Th17 cells in the lung (site of infection), but not the blood, associate with protection is consistent across many prior studies.
Notably, the number of NK cells in BAL was a selected minimal feature for predicting protection and remained significant after correcting for vaccine dose. An NK cell blood transcriptional signature was observed 3 weeks after aerosol vaccination with an Mtb sigH mutant (but not after aerosol BCG), a regimen that protected rhesus macaques from CDC1551 Mtb challenge25. NK cells were also reported to accumulate in the lungs of latent versus active CDC1551-infected rhesus macaques26. In humans, intradermal BCG-re-vaccination boosted IFNγ-producing mycobacteria-responsive NK cell responses for at least one year27. It should be noted that our network analysis shows that the number of NK cells in BAL correlated with several other cell subsets that also express CD8α (e.g., CD8 T cells, Vγ9 γδ T cells, and MAIT cells). Here, we did not evaluate cytokine or cytolytic function in NK cells; however, we speculate that these “innate” T or NK cells might contribute to IV BCG-elicited protection through direct effector function or by promoting adaptive T cell responses, as has been shown in models of TB and malaria28,29. While our univariate analysis did not validate the number or frequency of antigen-specific CD8 T cells in the BAL as a correlate of protection from infection, there is increasing evidence that the cytotoxic functionality of CD8 T cells may play a role in controlling Mtb18.
Finally, in a separate analysis of the blood transcriptomics from these animals, Liu et al. (Cell Reports Medicine, submitted) identify an innate signature at day 2 following IV BCG administration that predicts the subsequent adaptive BAL responses associated with protection described here – and, in fact, show that this signature predicts protection with a high degree of accuracy. These analyses suggest that early immune events following vaccination with IV BCG may be a more facile approach for predicting protection.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that prevention Mtb infection in a highly stringent rhesus macaque model can be achieved by immunization with IV BCG across a wide range of doses, and that Th1/Th17 responses in the airway predict protective outcome. This suggests that early phase clinical trials will gain considerable insight into immune correlates by assessing BAL, in addition to blood, in a subset of individuals. Ongoing studies depleting CD4 or CD8 T cells from IV BCG-immunized macaques prior to challenge will further define mechanistic correlates of protection. These data provide a roadmap for developing a highly successful vaccine against TB which encompasses having sufficient magnitude and breadth of Th1/Th17 and possibly CD8 T cell responses, and importantly, considering how changing the route of vaccination can lead to the generation of a high frequency of antigen-specific T cells at the site of infection.
STAR METHODS
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagent should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Mario Roederer (marior@mail.nih.gov).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Data code and availability
The dataset generated during and/or analyzed during the current study have been made available in the Supplementary material.
Custom code was used in this manuscript and has been made available at Zenodo.org under the record number 7855102. The R packages used for data analysis are described in more detail in the Methods section and the Key Resources Table.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
Key resources table
REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
---|---|---|
Antibodies | ||
BV510 Mouse anti-NHP CD45 (clone D058–1283) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563530, RRID:AB_2738262 |
BV650 Mouse anti-human CD3 (clone SP34–2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563916, RRID:AB_2738486 |
BUV395 Mouse anti-human CD8 (clone RPA-T8) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563795, RRID:AB_2722501 |
TCR gamma/delta monoclonal antibody, PE (clone 5A6.E9) | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# MHGD04, RRID:AB_10374518 |
TCR V gamma 9 monoclonal antibody, custom Alexa Fluor 680 custom-conjugated (clone 7A5) | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# TCR1720, RRID:AB_417089 |
Mouse anti-human CD69, ECD (clone TP1.55.3) | Beckman Coulter | Cat# 6607110, RRID:AB_1575978 |
Mouse anti-human CD159a (NKG2A), APC (clone Z199) | Beckman Coulter | Cat# A60797, RRID:AB_10643105 |
Brilliant Violet 570 anti-human CD20 (clone 2H7) | BioLegend | Cat# 302332, RRID:AB_2563805 |
Brilliant Violet 605 anti-human CD11b Antibody (clone ICRF44) | BioLegend | Cat# 301332, RRID:AB_2562021 |
APC/Cyanine7 anti-human CD163 (clone GH1–61) | BioLegend | Cat# 333622, RRID:AB_2563612 |
BUV805 Mouse anti-human CD8 (clone SK1) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 612889, RRID:AB_2833078 |
PE-Cy5 Mouse anti-human CD28 (clone CD28.2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555730, RRID:AB_396073 |
Brilliant Violet 711 anti-human CD183 (CXCR3) (clone G025H7) | BioLegend | Cat# 353732, RRID:AB_2563533 |
BUV737 Mouse anti-human CD196 (CCR6) (clone 11A9) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 612780, RRID:AB_2870109 |
APC-Cy7 Mouse anti-human CD3 (clone SP34–2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 557757, RRID:AB_396863 |
APC Mouse anti-human IFN-g (clone B27) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 554702, RRID:AB_398580 |
BV750 Rat anti-human IL-2 (clone MQ1–17H12) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 566361, RRID:AB_2739710 |
BV650 Mouse anti-human TNF (clone Mab11) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563418, RRID:AB_2738194 |
Brilliant Violet 711 anti-human CD183 (CXCR3) (clone BL168) | BioLegend | Cat# 512324, RRID:AB_2563886 |
BUV496 Mouse anti-human CD4 (clone L200) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 750591, RRID:AB_2874725 |
Mouse anti-human TCR V gamma 9, FITC (clone 7A5) | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# TCR2720, RRID:AB_417094 |
Alexa Fluor 700 Mouse anti-human CD197 (CCR7) (clone 150503) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 561143, RRID:AB_10562031 |
Brilliant Violet 605 anti-human CD183 (CXCR3) (clone G025H7) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 612780, RRID:AB_2870109 |
BUV737 Mouse anti-human CD196 (CCR6) (clone 11A9) | BD Biosciences | BUV737 Mouse AntiHuman CD196 (CCR6) |
Mouse anti-human CD185 (CXCR5), Super Bright 600 (clone MU5UBEE) | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# 63–9185-42, RRID:AB_2724065 |
Mouse anti-human CD279 (PD-1) BB660 custom-conjugated (clone EH12.1) | BD Biosciences | N/A |
R718 Armenian hamster anti-ICOS (CD278) (clone C398.4A) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 566991, RRID:AB_2869993 |
BUV563 Mouse anti-human CD25 (clone 2A3) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 612918, RRID:AB_2870203) |
Mouse anti-human HLA-DR, PE-Cyanine5.5 (clone TU36) | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# MHLDR18, RRID:AB_10372966 |
Brilliant Violet 785 anti-human CD14 (clone M5E2) | BioLegend | Cat# 301840, RRID:AB_2563425 |
BV650 Mouse anti-human CD16 (clone 3G8) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563692, RRID:AB_2869511 |
PE/Cyanine7 anti-human CD11c A (clone 3.9) | BioLegend | Cat# 301608, RRID:AB_389351 |
PE/Cyanine5 anti-human CD123 (clone 6H6) | BioLegend | Cat# 306008, RRID:AB_493574 |
Brilliant Violet 605 anti-human CD183 (CXCR3) (clone G025H7) | BioLegend | Cat# 353728, RRID:AB_2563157 |
Brilliant Violet 510 anti-human CD194 (CCR4) (clone L291H4) | BioLegend | Cat# 359416, RRID:AB_2562437 |
Brilliant Violet 711 anti-human CD279 (PD-1) (clone EH12.2H7) | BioLegend | Cat# 329928, RRID:AB_2562911 |
BUV395 Mouse anti-human CD107a (clone H4A3) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 565113, RRID:AB_2739073 |
Anti-human Granzyme B, PE-Cyanine5.5 (clone GB11) | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# GRB18, RRID:AB_2536541 |
Anti-human CD30 Ligand/TNFSF8 PE (clone 116614) | R and D Systems | Cat# FAB1028P, RRID:AB_2207494 |
BV421 Mouse anti-human CD154 (clone TRAP1) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563886, RRID:AB_2738466 |
Brilliant Violet 510 anti-human CD127 (IL-7R) (clone A019D5) | BioLegend | Cat# 351332, RRID:AB_2562304 |
PE-Cy7 Mouse anti-human CD45RA (clone L48) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 337167, RRID:AB_647424 |
PE-Cy7 Mouse anti-human CD45RA (clone 5H9) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 561216, RRID:AB_10611721 |
BUV395 Mouse anti-human CD45RA (clone 5H9) | BD Biosciences | Cat# N/, RRID:AB_2740052 |
BV421 Mouse anti-human IL-21 (clone 3A3-N2.1) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 564755, RRID:AB_2738933) |
Anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, PE-Cyanine5.5 (clone S3.5) | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# MHCD0418, RRID:AB_10376013 |
BUV737 Mouse anti-human CD4 (clone SK3) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 564305, RRID:AB_2713927) |
BV711 Mouse anti-human Invariant NK T Cell (clone 6B11) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 747720, RRID:AB_2872199 |
Brilliant Violet 785 anti-human CD279 (PD-1) (clone EH12.1) | BioLegend | Cat# 329930, RRID:AB_2563443 |
FcR Blocking Reagent, human | Miltenyi Biotec | Cat# 130–059-901, RRID:AB_2892112 |
Rhesus macaque MR1 (5-OP-RU), biotinylated monomer | NIH Tetramer Core Facility |
N/A |
Brilliant Violet 421 Streptavidin | Biolegend | Cat# 405225 |
Brilliant Stain Buffer Plus | BD Biosciences | Cat# 566385 |
LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain Kit, for UV excitation | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# L23105 |
Cytofix/Cytoperm Plus Fixation/Permeabilization Solution Kit with BC GolgiPlug | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555028 |
eBioscience Protein Transport Inhibitor Coctail | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# 00–4980-03 |
Anti-human/monkey IFNg mAb (clone MT126L) | MABTECH | Cat# 3421M-3–250 |
Anti-human IFNg mAb (clone 7-B6–1) | MABTECH | Cat# 3420–6-250 |
Streptavidin-HRP | MABTECH | Cat# 3310–1000 |
AEC Substrate kit, HRP | Vector Laboratories | SK-4200 |
Bacterial and virus strains | ||
BCG SSI (Danish strain 1331) | Aeras (IAVI) | Lot# 050613MF |
Mtb Erdman barcode library | BEI Resources | Cat# NR-50781 |
Biological samples | ||
Rhesus macaque blood, BAL, and tissues | This study | N/A |
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
Mtb H37Rv whole cell lysate | BEI Resources | Cat# NR-14822 |
Tuberculin PPD | (Statens Serum Institut) |
Batch RT50 |
Peptide array, Mtb ESAT-6 protein | BEI Resources | Cat# NR-50711 |
Peptide array, Mtb CFP-10 protein | BEI Resources | Cat# NR-50712 |
Mtb H37Rv Culture Filtrate Protein (CFP) | BEI Resources | Cat# NR-14825 |
Mtb300 Megapool | Aeras/JPT | Batch 040917Sass01 |
Critical commercial assays | ||
Milliplex Map Non-human primate cytokine magnetic bead panel -Immunology multiplex assay | Millipore Sigma | Cat#PRCYTOMAG40K |
Deposited data | ||
Custom code used for analysis | This paper | Zenodo.org; record number 7855102 |
Experimental models: Cell lines | ||
Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
Oligonucleotides | ||
Recombinant DNA | ||
Software and algorithms | ||
OsiriX MD v12.0.3 | Pixmeo SARL | RRID:SCR_013618 |
GraphPad Prism v9.3.1 | GraphPad | RRID:SCR_002798 |
Flowjo v.9.9.8 and 10.8.1 | BD Biosciences | RRID:SCR_008520 |
FACS Diva | BD Biosciences | RRID:SCR_001456 |
SPICE v6.1 | https://niaid.github.io/spice/ | RRID:SCR_016603 |
JMPPro v14.3.0 | SAS Institute Inc. | RRID:SCR_014242 |
R project for Statistical Computing v4.0.2 | R Core Team | RRID:SCR_001905 |
R package – dplyr v 1.0.5 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/dplyr/ |
R package – ggplot2 v3.3.5 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/ggplot2/index.html |
R package glmnet v4.1.4 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/glmnet/index.html |
R package systemsseRology | GitHub | https://github.com/LoosC/systemsseRology |
R package – Hmisc v4.4.2 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/Hmisc/index.html |
R package – Stats v4.0.3 | CRAN | https://rdrr.io/r/stats/stats-package.html |
R package- ggraph v2.0.4 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/ggraph/index.html |
R package igraph v 1.2.6 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/igraph/index.html |
R package lme4 v 1.1.29 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html |
R package ggpubr v0.4.0 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/ggpubr/index.html |
R package rstatix v07.0 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/rstatix/index.html |
R package caret v6.0.92 | CRAN | https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/caret/vignettes/caret.html |
Other | ||
LSR Fortessa X-50 Cell Analyzer | BD Biosciences | RRID:SCR_019602 |
LSR II Flow Cytometer | BD Biosciences | RRID:SCR_002159 |
Immunospot Plate Reader | Cellular Technology International, Inc. | Cat#S6MACRO |
Bio-Plex MAGPIX Multiplex Reader | Bio-Rad | N/A |
Luminex FLEXMAP 3D Instrument System | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Cat# APX1342 |
MultiScan LFER150 PET/CT | Mediso | N/A |
MicroPET Focus 220 preclinical PET scanner | Siemens | N/A |
Cremtom CT scanner (clinical 8-slice) | NeuroLogica | N/A |
GentleMACS Tissue Dissociator | Miltenyi | RRID:SCR_020267 |
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS
Animals
Animal work was approved by the Institutional Care & Use Committees of AAALAC (American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care)-accredited institutions (NIH Vaccine Research Center, Bioqual, Inc., and the University of Pittsburgh) and determined to be in accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Animal Welfare Act and Regulation (USDA) and the Guide for the Care & Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th Edition (NIH). Indian origin rhesus macaques were used in these studies.
35 adult Indian-origin rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta; median age 4.7 years; 17 males and 18 females) were housed throughout the vaccination phase at Bioqual, Inc. and transferred to the University of Pittsburgh (ABSL-3) for the challenge phase. Animals were monitored for physical health, food consumption, body weight, temperature (rectal probe), complete blood counts, and serum chemistries. MHC alleles were determined by sequencing (available upon request).
METHOD DETAILS
Study design
The study design (Figure S1) included 6 vaccine groups receiving half-log increments of IV BCG over a 3-log dose range (4.5 log10 - 7.5 log10 CFU) and an unvaccinated control. The sample size of each dose group was assigned with a goal of achieving 50% protection overall. We predicted that protection would begin to diminish within 1 – 1.5 log10 CFU below our published protective IV BCG dose (7.64 log10 mean CFU) and therefore assigned most of the animals in cohort (a) to dose groups of 6 – 7 log10 CFU. After analyzing the protective outcome of cohort (a), we elected to add a second cohort of animals (b) that would receive lower doses (5 – 6 log10 CFU) of IV BCG. Animals were randomized into vaccine groups based on birth colony, gender, and pre-vaccination CD4 T cell responses to PPD in the BAL. Post-hoc analysis of MHC alleles revealed no association with protection.
BCG vaccination
Animals were vaccinated at Bioqual, Inc. under sedation. BCG Danish Strain 1331 (Statens Serum Institute) that had been expanded and cryopreserved by Aeras (now IAVI) was serially diluted in cold PBS containing 0.05% tyloxapol (Sigma-Aldrich) and delivered intravenously into the saphenous vein in a volume of 2ml. Actual BCG doses were quantified by dilutionplating and are reported in Figure S1A.
Mtb Challenge
Macaques were challenged 5 – 6 months after IV BCG vaccination by delivering a 2ml volume of PBS containing an average of 12 CFU (range 4 −17 CFU) of barcoded Mtb Erdman as described 30. Actual Mtb doses were quantified by plating and reported in Table S1. Infectious doses across this range result in similar levels of TB disease in unvaccinated rhesus macaques in this and previous studies. Clinical monitoring of appetite, behavior, body weight, and cough and serial erythrocyte sedimentation rate and Mtb growth from gastric aspirate assessments were performed. These signs and PET CT characteristics were used to determine whether a macaque met humane endpoint criteria prior to the study endpoint.
Sample processing
Blood and BAL were collected according to the schedule in Figure S1B. Blood PBMC were separated using Ficoll-Paque PLUS and cryopreserved in FBS containing 10% DMSO; plasma was collected after ficoll separation. BAL wash fluid (3 × 20 ml washes with PBS) was centrifuged and the supernatant was collected and frozen. BAL cells were resuspended in warm R10 (RPMI 1640 with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 μg ml–1 streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated FBS) containing 50U/ml benzonase and passed through a 70 μM cell strainer before counting.
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry
BAL cells were analyzed fresh on the day of collection while PBMCs were cryopreserved and batch-analyzed at the end of the study. For BAL, 1–5×106 cells per sample were either stained immediately (unstimulated) or stimulated with R10 alone or 20 μg ml–1 Tuberculin PPD (Statens Serum Institut) for 2 hours before adding 10 μg ml–1 BD GolgiPlug and incubating for an additional 12 hours at 37°C before staining. For PBMC, cryopreserved cells were thawed, washed in R10 and either stained immediately (unstimulated) or rested in R10 for 7 hours prior to stimulation. 1–3×106 PBMCs were incubated for 14 hours at 37°C (12 hours with eBioscience Protein Transport Inhibitor Cocktail) with R10 alone, 20 μg ml–1 Mtb H37Rv whole cell lysate (WCL, BEI Resources), 2ug ml Mtb300 peptides 31, or 1μg ml–1 each of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 peptide pools (BEI Resources). Antibody and tetramer information and gating strategies for BAL and PBMC flow cytometry panels are shown in Figure S3, S5, S6, and S8. Generally, PBMC and BAL were stained as follows (all steps are at RT; not all steps refer to all panels): Wash twice with PBS/BSA (0.1% BSA); 20-minute incubation with tetramer diluted in PBS/BSA (rhesus MR1 tetramer 32 was provided by the NIH Tetramer Facility); wash twice with PBS; viability stain in PBS for 20 minutes; wash twice with flow buffer (PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 0.05% sodium azide); 10-minute incubation with human FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec); incubation with surface marker antibody cocktail in flow buffer containing 1x BD Brilliant Stain Buffer Plus for 20 minutes; wash thrice with flow buffer; 20-minute incubation BD Cytofix/Cytoperm solution; wash twice with 1x BD Perm/Wash buffer; 30 minute incubation with intracellular antibody cocktail in Perm/Wash Buffer containing 1x BD Brilliant Stain Buffer Plus; wash thrice with Perm/Wash buffer. Samples were acquired on either a BD LSR II cytometer or a BD LSRFortessa X-50 and analyzed with FlowJo Software (v.9.9.8 or 10.8.1 BD Biosciences) as previously described 7.
ELISpot and Milliplex assays
For ELISpot, hydrophobic high protein binding membrane plates were hydrated with 40% ethanol, washed with sterile water, and coated with anti-human/monkey IFNγ antibody (15 μg mL−1, MT126L, MabTech) overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed with PBS and blocked with RPMI plus 10% human AB serum for 2 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2. 2×105 PBMCs per well were incubated in RPMI supplemented L-glutamate, HEPES and 10% human AB serum alone (negative control) or containing 1 μg mL−1 each of ESAT-6 or CFP-10 peptide pools (BEI Resources) or 2 μg mL−1 Mtb culture filtrate protein (CFP) for 40 – 48 hours. To develop, plates were washed with PBS and biotinylated anti-human IFNγ antibody (2.5 μg mL−1, 7-B6–1, MabTech) was added for 2 hours at 37°C. After washing, streptavidin-HRP (1:100, MabTech) was added for 45 minutes at 37°C. Spots were stained using AEC peroxidase (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) and counted manually on an ELISpot plate reader. Data are reported as average spots from duplicate background subtracted wells. Wells with confluent staining were described as too numerous to count (TNTC). The cutoff for a positive ELISPOT response was 10 SFU/200,000 PBMC, determined by assessing results prior to infection in this and previous studies. For plasma cytokine measurement: cryopreserved plasma samples were batch-analyzed using a MILLIPLEX NHP cytokine multiplex kit per instructions (Millipore Sigma) and analyzed on a Bio-Plex Magpix Multiplex Reader (Bio-Rad).
Antibody levels
LAM- and PPD-specific antibody levels were measured as described previously 11. In brief, LAM and PPD were coupled to magnetic Luminex beads by DMTMM modification 33, and carbodiimide-NHS ester coupling 21, respectively. Coupled beads were incubated with plasma and BAL overnight at 4°C in 384-well plates (Greiner Bio-One) using the following dilutions: plasma IgG1 (1:30 for PPD, 1:150 for LAM), plasma IgA (1:30), and plasma IgM (1:750). Following overnight incubation, the plates were washed and unconjugated mouse anti-rhesus IgG1 (clone 7H11), IgA (clone 9B9), or IgM (Life Diagnostics, clone 2C11–1-5) antibody was added and incubated shaking at RT for 1 hour. Anti-rhesus IgG1 and IgA were obtained from the National Institutes of Health Nonhuman Primate Reagent Resource. After the secondary incubation, plates were washed and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was added (ThermoFisher, 31861) and incubated shaking at RT for 1 hour. Plates were washed and relative antibody levels (PE MFI values) were measured using a FlexMap 3D (Luminex). Data are represented as the log2 fold change in MFI over the pre-vaccination level for each animal. Samples were measured in duplicate.
PET CT scans and analysis
PET CT scans were performed using a microPET Focus 220 preclinical PET scanner (Siemens Molecular Solutions) and a clinical eight-slice helical CT scanner (NeuroLogica Corporation), or a preclinical integrated PET CT MultiScan LFER 150 (Mediso Medical Imaging Systems). 2-deoxy-2-(18F)Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was used as the PET probe. PET CT scans prior to Mtb challenge (23 of 34 vaccinated macaques; 1 unvaccinated) revealed no lung FDG activity (inflammation) although 8 of the 23 vaccinated animals had 1–4 thoracic lymph nodes with “warm” FDG activity (Standard Uptake Value; SUV >2.3 but <5) and 1 vaccinated animal had a single “hot” LN (SUV >5). However, there was no association between FDG activity and IV BCG dose. PET CT scans were performed on all animals 4, 8, and ~12 weeks (necropsy) after Mtb challenge. OsiriX MD (v.12.0.3) was used for scan analyses, as described 34. Lung inflammation was measured as total FDG activity in lungs. A region of interest (ROI) was segmented which encompassed all lung tissue on CT and was then transferred to the coregistered PET scan. On the PET scan, all image voxels of FDG-avid pathology (SUV > 2.3) were isolated and summated resulting in a cumulative standardized uptake value. To account for basal metabolic FDG uptake, total FDG activity was normalized to resting muscle resulting in a total lung inflammation value. Individual granulomas were counted on each CT scan. If granulomas were too small and numerous within a specific area to count individually or if they consolidated, quantification was designated too numerous to count (TNTC).
Necropsy, pathology scoring and Mtb burden
10 – 12 weeks after Mtb infection or at humane endpoint, macaques were euthanized by sodium pentobarbital injection, followed by gross examination for pathology. A published scoring system was used to determine total pathology from each lung lobe (number and size of lesions), lymph nodes (LN; size and extent of necrosis), and extrapulmonary compartments (number and size of lesions and whether the sample was CFU+) 23. Granulomas and other lung pathologies, all thoracic LNs, and peripheral LNs were matched to the final PET-CT scan and collected for quantification of Mtb. Each lesion in the lung (including granulomas, consolidations, and granuloma clusters), all thoracic LNs, random sampling (50%) of each of the seven lung lobes, spleen, and liver (3 – 5 granulomas if present or random samples (30%)), and any additional pathologies were processed to comprehensively quantify bacterial burdens. Sample processing was as follows: lung and spleen samples were processed using gentleMACS C tubes in RPMI 1640 followed by passing through a 70 μM cell strainer; LNs and granulomas and other lung lesions were mechanically disrupted and filtered through a cell strainer. Individual samples were plated on 7H11 agar and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 3 weeks for CFU enumeration or formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded for histological examination. CFUs were counted and summed to calculate the total thoracic bacterial burden for the animal. Three Mtb-infected animals with extensive PET CT readings were not necropsied and instead, total thoracic CFU was estimated based off PET CT activity, using a linear regression model equation developed previously 23. Values were only estimated and included for total CFU and thus these animals were excluded from lung, LN and extrapulmonary CFU analysis, but these animals were considered unprotected. Bacterial burden data for each macaque are listed in Table S1.
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Data Preprocessing
Immune measurements comprising values not above the noise level (e.g., Boolean subsets of antigen-specific CD4 T cells in PBMC that did not express CD154), the values for those measurements and their dependent features (e.g., the phenotype of such antigen-specific CD154– CD4 T cells) were excluded. This eliminated 650 of 2,673 measured values. Then, for all immune measurements collected longitudinally, the normalized area under the curve (nAUC) was computed as a time-weighted average value. This further reduced the number of features to 376, including PBMC, BAL, and complete blood counts (CBC). The nAUC method was chosen to reduce the total number of features as well as reducing noise by virtue of time-averaging.
Quantification and Statistics
Dot plots were created in Graphpad Prism (v.9.3.1 for macOS) to visualize outcomes by binned BCG dose. Kendall’s τ was used to test if there was a correlation between dose (log10-transformed) and each of the continuous outcomes. Fisher’s exact test was used to test the difference of proportions for two categorical variables (proportion of sterile animals). Nominal logistic regression models were used to test whether T cells in the airways predict protection (with log10-transformed dose added as a fixed effect). Nominal regression models were also used to test whether T cells in uninvolved lung lobes predict protection. Kendall’s τ and logistic regression models were calculated in JMP®Pro (v.14.3.0). Fisher’s exact test was calculated in Graphpad Prism.
Polar Plot
Polar plots show the mean percentile of each measurement across the protected and non-protected groups in different compartments. First, percentile rank scores were calculated for each measurement in all samples using the ‘percent rank’ function of the R package dplyr v1.0.5. Then, the mean percentiles were determined using the samples corresponding to protected and non-protected groups, respectively. The plots are visualized by the ‘ggplot’ function in R package ggplot2 v.3.3.5).
Multivariate Modeling
Models were built with an approach using a combination of the LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) for feature selection and then classification using PLSDA (Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis) with the LASSO-selected features 24. For the input of the combined approach, the nAUC dataset was z-scored. LASSO-based feature selection was performed on logistic regression using the 5-fold cross-validation and was repeated 10 times, and features, which are selected 5 times out of 10, were identified as selected features. Using the selected features, PLSDA was performed to discriminate protected animals from non-protected ones using the selected features with the corresponding groups. The first 2 latent variables (LVs) from a PLSDA model trained on the LASSO-selected features were visualized. LVs are compound variables composed of the LASSO-selected features. For visualization, 95% of data ellipses were calculated. Features were ordered according to their variable importance in projection (VIP) score, a score that is higher for features that contribute more to the model. Model robustness was assessed using 8-fold cross-validation. For each cross-validation run, the animals were randomly stratified into 8 subsets, ensuring that both groups were represented in each subject, with 7 subsets serving as the training set and the left one as the test set. Each subset served as the test set once. Then the average cross-validation accuracy was reported for 10 repetitions. In each cross-validation repetition, the significance of model performance was evaluated using “negative control” models of permuted testing by randomly shuffling the group labels. This process was repeated 100 times to generate a distribution of model accuracies. Then, the P values were obtained as the tail probability of the true classification accuracy from the cross-validation model in the distribution of the classification accuracies from permutation testing experiments. Finally, the median P value across 10 repetitions was reported with a resolution of 0.01. It was worth mentioning that “P < 0.01” means that the true classification accuracy is higher than all the accuracies across 100 times. In addition, the average confusion matrix was generated by five-fold cross-validation strategies 100 times to evaluate the robustness of the PLSDA model based on the selected representative features. The average confusion matrix across 100 simulations was visualized. LASSO was performed using R package glmnet v.4.1.4 and PLS-DA models were generated with the R package ropls interfaced by R package systemsseRology. The analyses were performed with R version 4.0.2.
Correlation Networks
Correlation networks were constructed to visualize the additional measured features that were significantly linked to the selected minimal features by LASSO. In brief, measured features that were significantly correlated with a Holms-Bonferroni correction to the final selected PLS model selected features were defined as co-correlates. Significant Spearman correlations above a threshold of |r| > 0.7 were visualized within the networks. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated using the rcorr function in R package Hmisc v.4.4.2 and the p values were corrected by “Benjamini-Hochberg’ correction in R package stats v.4.0.3. For visualization, the correlation networks were displayed using R package ggraph v.2.0.4 and igraph v.1.2.6.
Linear Mixed Modeling
We used two nested mixed linear models (null and full model) without/with protection information to assess the significance of the association between measurements and protection group while controlling for potential confounding characteristics including the BCG dose and the vaccination cohort. We fit two mixed linear models and estimated the improvement in model fit by likelihood ratio testing to identify the associated measurements.
Null Model: measurement ~ 1 + log10(IV.BCG.Dose) + (1 |Cohort)
Full Model: measurement ~ 1 + log10(IV.BCG.Dose) + Protection? + (1 |Cohort)
Likelihood ratio test: LRT = −2 * ln (MLE in Full model / MLE in Null model) ~ λ2 The R package lme4 was used to fit the mixed linear model to each measurement and test for differences in measurements depending on whether the NHMs was protected or not based on the total CFU. The P-value from the likelihood ratio test and t value (normalized coefficients) associated with the variable represented protection/non-protection information, Protection? in the full model, were visualized in a volcano plot using the ggplot function in R package ‘ggplot2 v. 3.3.5.
Supplementary Material
Table S1 (.xlsx). Animal information, BCG vaccination and Mtb challenge doses, and outcome data, related to all figures. Listed for each rhesus macaque: animal ID; date of birth; age at vaccination; vaccination date and cohort; BCG route and dose; binned BCG dose group; Mtb infection date and dose; necropsy date; days between infection and necropsy; total lung FDG and number of granulomas seen on CT immediately prior to necropsy; total thoracic CFU, total CFU in lung and lung lymph nodes (LN). Three animals with extensive disease were not necropsied; instead, total thoracic CFU was estimated (red) based on PET CT activity, using a linear regression model equation developed previously 23. Values were only estimated for total CFU and thus these 3 animals were excluded from lung and lung LN CFU analysis. TNTC, too numerous to count.
Table S3 (.xlsx). Immune parameters measured in BAL and blood, related to Figures 6 and 7. Multivariate analysis was performed using immune measurements from the periphery (P, PBMC or plasma) or lung (L, BAL). The normalized area under the curve (nAUC) was computed for all longitudinal measurements. For each described immune parameter, tissue compartment, unit of measure, log transformation status (y/n), antigen stimulation condition, and abbreviated name is listed. PPD, purified protein derivative; WCL, whole cell lysate; LAM, lipoarabinomannan.
Highlights.
An IV BCG dose-ranging study generated a range of protection against TB in macaques
Immune measurements from blood and BAL were integrated for correlates analysis
Multivariate analysis of BAL features revealed a highly coordinated immune network
TB-specific CD4 Th1/Th17 and NK cells in the airway correlated with protection
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the VRC; NIH contract #75N93019C00071 (SMF, JLF, DAL); NIH R01 award: AI152158 (DAL); NIH F31 award: AI150171-01 (EBI, SMF, GA); BMGF INV-020435 (JLF). We thank veterinary and research technicians (D. Fillmore, C. Ameel, A. Myers, C. Bigbee), and imaging personnel (LJ Frye) at the University of Pittsburgh and members of the VRC Translational Research Program (R. Woodward, J.P. Todd), as well as BioQual, Inc for animal care. We thank the VRC Flow Cytometry Core for support and members of the Flynn and Seder laboratories for discussions.
Footnotes
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
INCLUSION AND DIVERSITY
We support inclusive, diverse, and equitable conduct of research.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Martinez L, Cords O, Liu Q, Acuna-Villaorduna C, Bonnet M, Fox GJ, Carvalho ACC, Chan PC, Croda J, Hill PC, et al. (2022). Infant BCG vaccination and risk of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis throughout the life course: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 10, e1307–e1316. 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00283-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carpenter SM, and Lu LL (2022). Leveraging Antibody, B Cell and Fc Receptor Interactions to Understand Heterogeneous Immune Responses in Tuberculosis. Frontiers in immunology 13, 830482. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.830482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sia JK, and Rengarajan J (2019). Immunology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections. Microbiol Spectr 7. 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0022-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bellamy R (2003). Susceptibility to mycobacterial infections: the importance of host genetics. Genes Immun 4, 4–11. 10.1038/sj.gene.6363915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Godfrey MS, and Friedman LN (2019). Tuberculosis and Biologic Therapies: AntiTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha and Beyond. Clin Chest Med 40, 721–739. 10.1016/j.ccm.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Larsen SE, Williams BD, Rais M, Coler RN, and Baldwin SL (2022). It Takes a Village: The Multifaceted Immune Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Vaccine-Induced Immunity. Frontiers in immunology 13, 840225. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.840225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Darrah PA, Zeppa JJ, Maiello P, Hackney JA, Wadsworth MH 2nd, Hughes TK, Pokkali S, Swanson PA 2nd, Grant NL, Rodgers MA, et al. (2020). Prevention of tuberculosis in macaques after intravenous BCG immunization. Nature 577, 95–102. 10.1038/s41586-019-1817-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dijkman K, Sombroek CC, Vervenne RAW, Hofman SO, Boot C, Remarque EJ, Kocken CHM, Ottenhoff THM, Kondova I, Khayum MA, et al. (2019). Prevention of tuberculosis infection and disease by local BCG in repeatedly exposed rhesus macaques. Nat Med 25, 255–262. 10.1038/s41591-018-0319-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hansen SG, Zak DE, Xu G, Ford JC, Marshall EE, Malouli D, Gilbride RM, Hughes CM, Ventura AB, Ainslie E, et al. (2018). Prevention of tuberculosis in rhesus macaques by a cytomegalovirus-based vaccine. Nat Med 24, 130–143. 10.1038/nm.4473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sharpe S, White A, Sarfas C, Sibley L, Gleeson F, McIntyre A, Basaraba R, Clark S, Hall G, Rayner E, et al. (2016). Alternative BCG delivery strategies improve protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in non-human primates: Protection associated with mycobacterial antigen-specific CD4 effector memory T-cell populations. Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) 101, 174–190. 10.1016/j.tube.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Irvine EB, O’Neil A, Darrah PA, Shin S, Choudhary A, Li W, Honnen W, Mehra S, Kaushal D, Gideon HP, et al. (2021). Robust IgM responses following intravenous vaccination with Bacille Calmette-Guerin associate with prevention of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in macaques. Nat Immunol 22, 1515–1523. 10.1038/s41590-021-01066-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gideon HP, Phuah J, Myers AJ, Bryson BD, Rodgers MA, Coleman MT, Maiello P, Rutledge T, Marino S, Fortune SM, et al. (2015). Variability in tuberculosis granuloma T cell responses exists, but a balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is associated with sterilization. PLoS pathogens 11, e1004603. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gopal R, Rangel-Moreno J, Slight S, Lin Y, Nawar HF, Fallert Junecko BA, Reinhart TA, Kolls J, Randall TD, Connell TD, and Khader SA (2013). Interleukin-17-dependent CXCL13 mediates mucosal vaccine-induced immunity against tuberculosis. Mucosal immunology 6, 972–984. 10.1038/mi.2012.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khader SA, Bell GK, Pearl JE, Fountain JJ, Rangel-Moreno J, Cilley GE, Shen F, Eaton SM, Gaffen SL, Swain SL, et al. (2007). IL-23 and IL-17 in the establishment of protective pulmonary CD4+ T cell responses after vaccination and during Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge. Nature immunology 8, 369–377. 10.1038/ni1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lindestam Arlehamn CS, Gerasimova A, Mele F, Henderson R, Swann J, Greenbaum JA, Kim Y, Sidney J, James EA, Taplitz R, et al. (2013). Memory T cells in latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are directed against three antigenic islands and largely contained in a CXCR3+CCR6+ Th1 subset. PLoS pathogens 9, e1003130. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shanmugasundaram U, Bucsan AN, Ganatra SR, Ibegbu C, Quezada M, Blair RV, Alvarez X, Velu V, Kaushal D, and Rengarajan J (2020). Pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis control associates with CXCR3- and CCR6-expressing antigen-specific Th1 and Th17 cell recruitment. JCI Insight 5. 10.1172/jci.insight.137858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wareham AS, Tree JA, Marsh PD, Butcher PD, Dennis M, and Sharpe SA (2014). Evidence for a role for interleukin-17, Th17 cells and iron homeostasis in protective immunity against tuberculosis in cynomolgus macaques. PLoS One 9, e88149. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gideon HP, Hughes TK, Tzouanas CN, Wadsworth MH 2nd, Tu AA, Gierahn TM, Peters JM, Hopkins FF, Wei JR, Kummerlowe, et al. (2022). Multimodal profiling of lung granulomas in macaques reveals cellular correlates of tuberculosis control. Immunity 55, 827–846 e810. 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ogongo P, Tezera LB, Ardain A, Nhamoyebonde S, Ramsuran D, Singh A, Ng’oepe A, Karim F, Naidoo T, Khan K, et al. (2021). Tissue-resident-like CD4+ T cells secreting IL-17 control Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the human lung. The Journal of clinical investigation 131. 10.1172/JCI142014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Scriba TJ, Penn-Nicholson A, Shankar S, Hraha T, Thompson EG, Sterling D, Nemes E, Darboe F, Suliman S, Amon LM, et al. (2017). Sequential inflammatory processes define human progression from M. tuberculosis infection to tuberculosis disease. PLoS pathogens 13, e1006687. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brown EP, Licht AF, Dugast AS, Choi I, Bailey-Kellogg C, Alter G, and Ackerman ME (2012). High-throughput, multiplexed IgG subclassing of antigen-specific antibodies from clinical samples. J Immunol Methods 386, 117–123. 10.1016/j.jim.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coleman MT, Maiello P, Tomko J, Frye LJ, Fillmore D, Janssen C, Klein E, and Lin PL (2014). Early Changes by (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coregistered with computed tomography predict outcome after Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in cynomolgus macaques. Infection and immunity 82, 2400–2404. 10.1128/iai.01599-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maiello P, DiFazio RM, Cadena AM, Rodgers MA, Lin PL, Scanga CA, and Flynn JL (2018). Rhesus Macaques Are More Susceptible to Progressive Tuberculosis than Cynomolgus Macaques: a Quantitative Comparison. Infection and immunity 86. 10.1128/iai.00505-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bartsch YC, Wang C, Zohar T, Fischinger S, Atyeo C, Burke JS, Kang J, Edlow AG, Fasano A, Baden LR, et al. (2021). Humoral signatures of protective and pathological SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. Nat Med 27, 454–462. 10.1038/s41591-021-01263-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaushal D, Foreman TW, Gautam US, Alvarez X, Adekambi T, Rangel-Moreno J, Golden NA, Johnson AM, Phillips BL, Ahsan MH, et al. (2015). Mucosal vaccination with attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces strong central memory responses and protects against tuberculosis. Nature communications 6, 8533. 10.1038/ncomms9533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Esaulova E, Das S, Singh DK, Choreno-Parra JA, Swain A, Arthur L, Rangel-Moreno J, Ahmed M, Singh B, Gupta A, et al. (2021). The immune landscape in tuberculosis reveals populations linked to disease and latency. Cell Host Microbe 29, 165–178 e168. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Suliman S, Geldenhuys H, Johnson JL, Hughes JE, Smit E, Murphy M, Toefy A, Lerumo L, Hopley C, Pienaar B, et al. (2016). Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Revaccination of Adults with Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Induces Long-Lived BCG-Reactive NK Cell Responses. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 197, 1100–1110. 10.4049/jimmunol.1501996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ruibal P, Voogd L, Joosten SA, and Ottenhoff THM (2021). The role of donor-unrestricted T-cells, innate lymphoid cells, and NK cells in anti-mycobacterial immunity. Immunological reviews 301, 30–47. 10.1111/imr.12948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zaidi I, Diallo H, Conteh S, Robbins Y, Kolasny J, Orr-Gonzalez S, Carter D, Butler B, Lambert L, Brickley E, et al. (2017). gammadelta T Cells Are Required for the Induction of Sterile Immunity during Irradiated Sporozoite Vaccinations. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 199, 3781–3788. 10.4049/jimmunol.1700314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Capuano SV 3rd, Croix DA, Pawar S, Zinovik A, Myers A, Lin PL, Bissel S, Fuhrman C, Klein E, and Flynn JL (2003). Experimental Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of cynomolgus macaques closely resembles the various manifestations of human M. tuberculosis infection. Infection and immunity 71, 58315844. 10.1128/IAI.71.10.5831-5844.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lindestam Arlehamn CS, McKinney DM, Carpenter C, Paul S, Rozot V, Makgotlho E, Gregg Y, van Rooyen M, Ernst JD, Hatherill M, et al. (2016). A Quantitative Analysis of Complexity of Human Pathogen-Specific CD4 T Cell Responses in Healthy M. tuberculosis Infected South Africans. PLoS pathogens 12, e1005760. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Corbett AJ, Eckle SB, Birkinshaw RW, Liu L, Patel O, Mahony J, Chen Z, Reantragoon R, Meehan B, Cao H, et al. (2014). T-cell activation by transitory neo-antigens derived from distinct microbial pathways. Nature 509, 361–365. 10.1038/nature13160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schlottmann SA, Jain N, Chirmule N, and Esser MT (2006). A novel chemistry for conjugating pneumococcal polysaccharides to Luminex microspheres. J Immunol Methods 309, 75–85. 10.1016/j.jim.2005.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.White AG, Maiello P, Coleman MT, Tomko JA, Frye LJ, Scanga CA, Lin PL, and Flynn JL (2017). Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. 10.3791/56375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1 (.xlsx). Animal information, BCG vaccination and Mtb challenge doses, and outcome data, related to all figures. Listed for each rhesus macaque: animal ID; date of birth; age at vaccination; vaccination date and cohort; BCG route and dose; binned BCG dose group; Mtb infection date and dose; necropsy date; days between infection and necropsy; total lung FDG and number of granulomas seen on CT immediately prior to necropsy; total thoracic CFU, total CFU in lung and lung lymph nodes (LN). Three animals with extensive disease were not necropsied; instead, total thoracic CFU was estimated (red) based on PET CT activity, using a linear regression model equation developed previously 23. Values were only estimated for total CFU and thus these 3 animals were excluded from lung and lung LN CFU analysis. TNTC, too numerous to count.
Table S3 (.xlsx). Immune parameters measured in BAL and blood, related to Figures 6 and 7. Multivariate analysis was performed using immune measurements from the periphery (P, PBMC or plasma) or lung (L, BAL). The normalized area under the curve (nAUC) was computed for all longitudinal measurements. For each described immune parameter, tissue compartment, unit of measure, log transformation status (y/n), antigen stimulation condition, and abbreviated name is listed. PPD, purified protein derivative; WCL, whole cell lysate; LAM, lipoarabinomannan.