Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2023 Sep 14;9(9):e20140. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20140

Insights into the pleiotropic roles of ZNF703 in cancer

Shuang Wang a,b,c, Rong Liu d,
PMCID: PMC10559930  PMID: 37810156

Abstract

Zinc finger proteins (ZNFs) belong to the NET/NLZ protein family. In physiological functions, ZNF703 play significant roles in embryonic development, especially in the nervous system. As an transcription factors with zinc finger domains, abnormal regulation of the ZNF703 protein is associated with enhanced proliferation, invasion, and metastasis as well as drug resistance in many tumors, although mechanisms of action vary depending on the specific tumor microenvironment. ZNF703 lacks a nuclear localization sequence despite its function requiring nuclear DNA binding. The purpose of this review is to summarize the architecture of ZNF703, its roles in tumorigenesis, and tumor progression, as well as future oncology therapeutic prospects, which have implications for understanding tumor susceptibility and progression.

Keywords: ZNF703, Transcription factor, Carcinogenesis, Tumor progression

Highlights

  • The zinc finger protein ZNF703 is subfamily of NET/NLZ proteins.

  • ZNF703 overexpression is associated with tumor progression in a variety of cancers

  • Multiple signalling pathways and interaction partners are involved in ZNF703.

  • A co-activator or co-repressor complex is formed by ZNF703 in transcriptional regulation.

1. Introduction

Transcription factors (TFs) are trans-acting proteins that directly or indirectly recognize and bind specific DNA sequences near the transcriptional start site of a target gene, to regulate its transcription positively or negatively [[1], [2], [3]]. Over 1000 trans-acting factors regulate gene expression by affecting RNA polymerase II activity in human cells [4]. Multiple types of cancer are associated with abnormal TF expression [5,6].

Zinc finger proteins possess zinc ‘finger’ domains and perform a wide range of functions [7]. Zinc ions (Zn2+) maintain the spatial conformation of ZNFs to recognize DNA, RNA, and proteins [8]. An assortment of ZNFs is generated through the utilization of various permutations of the conserved cysteine and histidine residues that are accountable for Zn2+ binding [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. The largest zinc finger C2H2 motif (CX2CX3FX5LX2HX3H) folds to adopt a finger-like structure when interacting with Zn2+ [11],[13],[14]. As a result of this conformational change, the DNA binding domain forms a unique structure that complements the DNA double helix in order to facilitate recognition of specific DNA sequences and targeted regulation of gene transcription [11].

Chromosome 8p11.23 encodes the ZNF proteins, which have a molecular weight of 58 kDa and contain 590 amino acids. The zinc finger of ZNF703 is located between amino acids 456 and 484. Post-translational modifications including N-acetylation (Ser-2), phosphorylation (Ser-252), and omega-N-methylation (Arg-580) are known [15,16].The different styles of ZNF703 structure are indicated (Fig. S1). NET family proteins reveal three conserved domains (Sp, Btd box, and C2H2 zinc finger) typically [17], but there are six domains in ZNF703 (the conserved domains plus domains LP, PY, and YL) [18]. Furthermore, most ZNF proteins can translocate to the nucleus while ZNF703 lacks nuclear localization sequences.

Based on the deletion model of ZNF/NLZ1 specific domains, ZNF703 may gain access to the nucleus through its unique PY and YL domains by interacting with other proteins [18]. This is consistent with argument that the C-terminal residue of zebrafish Nlz1 is essential for nuclear localization [19,20]. Nuclear localization is crucial to ZNF703 activity [21], but the specific nuclear translocation mechanism remains to be elucidated. In physiological functions, ZNF703 is involved in the morphogenesis of cilia and various other tissues in zebrafish (Danio rerio) [22]. In the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), NET family members Elbow and NocA are essential for trachea, eye, wing, and leg development [23]. In non-human vertebrates, Nlz1 and Nlz2 participate in various developmental processes, including brain development, limb formation, and visual fissure closure [17,20,[23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]]. Moreover, abnormal regulation of ZNF703 plays an important role in the occurrence and development of human tumors. A review is presented here for the first time summarizing ZNF703's malignant biological behaviors and potential significance in tumors, and proposing directions for future clinical research.

2. Roles in oncogenesis and tumor progression

Globally, cancer is a major public health concern associated with high mortality rates. Among the hallmarks of malignancy are sustained proliferation of cells, evasion of growth suppressors, resistance to cell death, indefinite replication potential, angiogenesis, invasive and metastatic capacity, metabolic reprogramming, and immune evasion [29]. Genome rearrangement is a complex process with functional consequences. As the only full-length gene within the smallest amplified part in the 8p12 chromosomal region [30,31], ZNF703 is widely considered to be evolutionarily conserved. It is common to exhibit simultaneous amplification of 11q12-11q14 and 8p11-8p12 chromosomal regions for breast tumors [32]. Chr8-chr11 translocation may be a critical event in the early stages of tumorigenesis [33,34], especially in squamous lung cancer, breast cancer, squamous esophageal cancer, and urothelial cancer [35].

2.1. Roles of ZNF703 in proliferation

One of the most common features of tumors is the dysregulated proliferation of cells. ZNF703 promotes tumor cell proliferation through diverse mechanisms. A breast cancer study found that lncRNA SPRY4-IT1 up-regulates ZNF703, thereby promoting proliferation, opposing apoptosis, and arresting the G1 phase [36]. This mechanism was confirmed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [37]. USF1 activated lncRNA WDFY3-AS2 via targeting miR-491-5p to upregulate ZNF703 and promoted cell proliferation in lung adenocarcinomas [38]. In gastric cancer, miR-491-5p also upregulated ZNF703, although the upstream regulator in this case was LBX2-AS1 [39]. The similar mechanism was also detected in a breast cancer study [40]. Most of them was the ceRNA mechanism. Additionally, 17-β-oestradiol increased ZNF703 levels, which decreased transforming growth factor-β receptor II (TGF-βRII) expression [41], thereby preventing TGF-β from inhibiting proliferation of breast cancer cell [42]. Notably, this was associated with binding of ZNF703 to the TGF-βRII promoter and transcription-suppressive chromatin modification. In glioma, ZNF703 targeted the promoter of the lncRNA linc-UBC1 to enhance glioma cell proliferation [43]. It may be that copy number variation and/or activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway led to the overexpression of ZNF703 in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas [44,45]. ZNF703 facilitated proliferation of medullary thyroid carcinoma cells by activating the AKT/mTOR pathway in vitro and in vivo [46], ZNF703 and was also involved in the progression of non-small cell lung cancer by activating the AKT/mTOR pathway [47]. Most of all, ZNF703 was acting as a transcription factor. Literature (Table 1) and mechanisms (Fig. 1A) were summarised.

Table 1.

Expression of ZNF703 in various cancer types and cell proliferation.

Cancer
Type
Study type Experimental model NEL Mechanism of action Mode of modulation References
Breast cancer In vitro MDA-MB-231 and 435S cell lines Image 1 siRNA ZNF703 promoted cell proliferation regulated by lncRNA SPRY4-IT1. [36]
Lung adenocarcinoma In vivo SPCA‐1 cell line Image 1 pcDNA3.1/ZNF703 ZNF703 promoted the tumor growth regulated by lncRNA WDFY3‐AS2. [48]
Gastric cancer In vitro MGC803 and BGC823 cell lines Image 1 pcDNA3.1/ZNF703 ZNF703 promoted cell proliferation and reduced the apoptosis by upregulated lncRNA LBX2-AS1. [39]
Breast cancer In vitro MCF-7 cell line Image 1 siRNA,
GFP-ZNF703 vector
ZNF703 promoted cell proliferation and increased cancer stem cell population by acting as nuclear co-repressor to regulate E2F1 transcriptional activity. [41]
Breast cancer In vitro MCF-7 cell line Image 1 ZNF703 knockdown, ZNF703 downregulated TGFβRII by directly binding its promoter regions to regulate cell proliferation. [42]
Glioma In vitro LN229 and U87 cell lines Image 1 pcDNA-ZNF703 ZNF703 alleviated the proliferative and invasive potentials by binding at the promoter regions of linc-UBC1. [43]
Medullary thyroid cancer MTC patients, In vitro,in vivo MTC TT cell line Image 1 siRNA,
ZNF703 knockdown
ZNF703 promoted cell proliferation and tumor growth. [46]

NEL: normal expression level.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The mechanism involved in ZNF703 including the signaling pathway, upstream regulation network and downstream targets. A:The mechanism of ZNF703 in cancer cell proliferation. B: The mechanism of ZNF703 in cancer cell invasion and migration. C: The mechanism of ZNF703 in cancer cell self-renew, drug resistance and therapy.

2.2. Roles of ZNF703 in invasion and metastasis

ZNF703 transactivated claudin 4 (CLDN4) expression to induce epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) via directly binding to the CLDN4 promoter [49]. It is confirmed that ZNF703 promoted colorectal cancer cell invasive ability in vitro experiments [50]. In breast cancer, ZNF703 overexpression also promoted EMT, thereby inhibiting cell adhesion and enhancing cell invasion [51]. Mechanistically, ZNF703 complexed with Groucho prevented E-cadherin transcriptional activation to accelerate the tumor progression and metastasis [51]. ZNF703 also participate in the progression from carcinoma in situ to infiltrating lobular breast cancer [52]. ZNF703 played a crucial role in cholangiocarcinoma emergence and progression [53], and ZNF703 also facilitated growth and metastasis via the PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β pathway in oral squamous carcinoma [54]. Furthermore, ZNF703 was highly expressed in infiltrated gastric cancer tissues (with in vitro findings consistent with those of the above studies) [55], and the lncRNA TYMSOS interacted with miR-4739 to regulate its target gene ZNF703 in gastric cancer [56]. ZNF703 expression was associated with the tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and advanced disease stage in papillary thyroid carcinoma [57]. ZNF703 could be detected in circulating tumor DNA from patients with advanced ovarian cancer [58]. ZNF703 regulated by miRNA-651-3p affected EMT in ovarian cancer cells [59]. Literature (Table 2) and mechanisms (Fig. 1B) are summarised.

Table 2.

Expression of ZNF703 in various cancer types and migration and invasion.

Cancer
Type
Study type Experimental model NEL Mechanism of action Mode of modulation References
Hepatocellular carcinoma HCC patients, in vitro,
in vivo
HCCLM3 and SMMC7721 cell lines Image 1 ZNF703 knockdown ZNF703 induced EMT via directly binding to the CLDN4 promoter and transactivating CLDN4 expression. [49]
Colorectal cancer CRC patients, in vitro LoVo and cell lines Image 1 RNA interference Knockdown of ZNF703 expression inhibited CRC cell proliferation and migration. [50]
Cholangiocarcinoma CAA patients, in vitro, in vivo QBC939 and RBE cell lines Image 1 siRNA,
ZNF703 knockdown
ZNF703 could potently promote the progression of CCA. [53]
Oral squamous cell carcinoma OSCC patients, in vitro, in vivo Tca-8113 and KB cell line Image 1 pGCFU-ZNF703-GFP vector,
ZNF703 knockdown
ZNF703 activated the PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β signaling pathway and its downstream effectors to regulat the cell cycle and EMT. [54]
Gastric cancer GC patients, in vitro SGC7901 cell line Image 1 RNA interference ZNF703 acting as a oncogene promoted cell proliferation and migration significantly to be considered a therapeutic target for metastatic gastric cancer. [55]
Papillary thyroid cancer PTC patients, in vitro K1 cell line Image 1 ZNF703 siRNA ZNF703-siRNA down-regulated E2F1 and MMP9 protein expression and enhanced the expression of p27 protein to inhibit the proliferation and invasion of K1 cells. [57]

NEL: normal expression level.

2.3. Roles of ZNF703 in cancer stem cells

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) exist in various types of tumors [[60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66]]. Self-renewing populations of these cells are highly tumorigenic and resistant to conventional radiation and chemotherapy [[67], [68], [69]]. During asymmetric division, stem cells maintain their own population while producing functionally mature progeny [70,71]. The role of ZNF703 in CSCs had received very little research. Although some studies suggested that ZNF703 may not bind directly to DNA due to its single zinc finger domain [17,72,73]. In response to oestrogen receptor signalling, it complexed with DCAF7, PHB2 and NCOR2 to inhibit E2F1 transcription and inactivate RB1 and P27Kip1, thereby shortening the G1 phase and switching the cellular balance from differentiation to self-renewal) [41]. Mechanisms are summarised (Fig. 1C). Future studies could target ZNF703 in CSCs to explore mechanisms and therapeutic prospects.

2.4. Roles of ZNF703 in resistance to chemotherapy and other antineoplastic drugs

Cancer recurrence and poorer outcome are associated with drug resistance. Chemotherapeutic resistance include intrinsic and acquired, which is caused and sustained by intracellular detoxification and reduced effective intracellular drug concentration, alterations in drug targets and signalling transduction molecules, abnormal repair of DNA damage, and evasion of cell apoptosis [74]. There was an increase in sorafenib sensitivity in cells with ZNF703 knockout, suggesting that ZNF703 may serve as a biomarker or therapeutic target for sorafenib resistance [49]. A next-generation sequencing for the evaluation of breast cancer responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemotherapy revealed that there was 30.1% ZNF703 amplification [75]. Allele loss or amplification within the 8p11-12 chromosomal region predicts a poorer response to radiation and chemotherapy, as well as poorer survival [76] (Fig. 1C). Based on above all, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate the relationship and mechanism between ZNF703 and chemotherapy resistance. According to the published literatures, tumor cells overexpressing ZNF703 were more likely to develop resistance to chemotherapy drugs by affecting signal transduction pathways or cell apoptosis.

2.5. Therapeutic targeting of ZNF703

MCF7 cell proliferation was effectively inhibited by small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting ZNF703 combined with ibuprofen-mediated COX-2 inhibition [77]. Linum album extracts induced apoptosis of the gastric cancer cell line AGS, possibly via down-regulating ZNF703 expression, and may therefore have therapeutic potential in gastric cancer [78]. Similarly, a hydroalcoholic extract of Levisticum officinale, a Chinese medicinal herb, induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells by decreasing the level of ZNF703-encoding mRNA [79] (Fig. 1C).

2.6. The signalling pathways involving in ZNF703

Several transcription factors are involved in the development and occurrence of tumors by regulating multiple signalling pathways [80]. The cellular signalling pathways themselves are intricately interconnected. ZNF703 was involved in the Wnt signalling pathway in embryonic development [22,51,81]. In tumor related research, most studies involving ZNF703 and signalling pathways had shown abnormal activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, respectively, in oral squamous cell carcinoma [54], ovarian cancer [82], Luminal breast cancer [83], non-small cell lung cancer [47] and medullary thyroid carcinoma cell [46]. However, they were only phosphorylation changes, and the mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated. About MAPK signalling pathway, there was only one study in which ZNF703 affected the MEK/ERK pathway in ovarian cancer without further investigation [59]. Research on ZNF703 and signalling pathways is still superficial and needs to be further explored.

3. Interaction with other proteins

The transcription factor's activity is controlled by phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation/deacetylation, and interactions between two or more proteins, including occasional switching from one to the opposite function [84,85]. Many interaction partners of ZNF703 have been identified. For example, it binds HDAC deacetylases directly to act as a transcriptional repressor, specifically, the domain of ZNF703 required for binding appeared to reside between the 'buttonhead box' (Btd) and the C2H2 zinc finger (ZF) [86]. However, ZNF703 could regulate breast CSC self-renewal activity by directly interacting with DCAF7, PBH2, and NCOR2 [41]. We also found that ZNF703 as an oncogene played an important role in the epigenetic modification of ovarian cancer proliferation by interacting with HE4 and epigenetically regulating PEA15 [82]. Most of the functions of ZNF703 are performed in the nucleus, but it is not clear how ZNF703 enters the nucleus and may be related to interacting proteins. The online software String was also used to retrieve the interacting protein of ZNF703 (Fig. S2). A list of ZNF703-interacting proteins is provided (Table 3). The results of the database might not be exactly the same as reported in the literatures.

Table 3.

The interaction proteins of ZNF703.

Protein Combined Score Function Evidences References
DCAF7 0.641 Involved in craniofacial development. Acts upstream of the EDN1 pathway and is required for formation of the upper jaw equivalent, the palatoquadrate. Experimental/Biochemical Data [41]
TRIM28 0.900 Mediates gene silencing by recruiting CHD3, a subunit of the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylation (NuRD) complex, and SETDB1 (which specifically methylates histone H3 at 'Lys-9' (H3K9me)) to the promoter regions of KRAB target genes. Association in Curated Databases None
FIGN 0.632 Severs microtubules along their length and depolymerizes their ends, primarily the minus-end, that may lead to the suppression of microtubule growth from and attachment to centrosomes. Co-Mentioned in Pubmed Abstracts [87,88]
TEP1 0.587 Component of the telomerase ribonucleoprotein complex that is essential for the replication of chromosome termini. Also component of the ribonucleoprotein vaults particle, a multi- subunit structure involved in nucleo-cytoplasmic transport. Co-Mentioned in Pubmed Abstracts [ [53,86,89,90]]
PPAPDC1B 0.627 Displays magnesium-independent phosphatidate phosphatase activity in vitro. Catalyzes the conversion of phosphatidic acid to diacylglycerol. May be a metastatic suppressor for hepatocellular carcinoma. Co-Mentioned in Pubmed Abstracts [[91], [92], [93], [94]]
PROSC 0.819 Pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP)-binding protein, which may be involved in intracellular homeostatic regulation of pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP), the active form of vitamin B6. Co-Mentioned in Pubmed Abstracts [ [47,93]]
ERLN2 0.794 Component of the ERLIN1/ERLIN2 complex which mediates the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) such as ITPR1. Co-Mentioned in Pubmed Abstracts [94,95]
CCND1 0.650 Regulatory component of the cyclin D1-CDK4 (DC) complex that phosphorylates and inhibits members of the retinoblastoma (RB) protein family including RB1 and regulates the cell-cycle during G(1)/S transition. Co-Mentioned in Pubmed Abstracts [[96], [97], [98]]
CTNND1 0.582 Binds to and inhibits the transcriptional repressor ZBTB33, which may lead to activation of target genes of the Wnt signalling pathway (By similarity). Associates with and regulates the cell adhesion properties of both C-, E− and N-cadherins, being critical for their surface stability. Co-Mentioned in Pubmed Abstracts [99,100]
ZNF142 0.637 May be involved in transcriptional regulation; Zinc fingers C2H2-type Co-Mentioned in Pubmed Abstracts [101]

4. Discussion and conclusions

Morbidity and mortality caused by cancer are among the highest in the world [102]. Although targeted therapy has made significant progress in treating a few cancers, many cancers still pose a difficult diagnosis and treatment challenge. Angiogenesis is also necessary for cancer cell survival and metastasis [103]. Angiogenesis-targeting drugs such as anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies are already under investigation and in clinical use [104]. There have been few studies investigating the role of ZNF proteins in angiogenesis, which could be explored further. Compared to normal tissue, cancer cells maintain a high rate of glycolysis, rapidly converting glucose into lactic acid even in the presence of oxygen (‘oxygen glycolysis’); this preference for energy generation by converting pyruvate to lactic acid is also known as the ‘Warburg effect’ [105]. Many studies have examined the roles of ZNF proteins in tumor cell glucose metabolism. A ZBTB7A ZNF mutation significantly up-regulated expression of glycolytic genes resulting in enhancing glycolysis and supporting tumor cell proliferation [106]. However, there are currently no reports regarding the effect of ZNF703 on tumor cell glucose metabolism. In response to insulin, growth factors, and cytokines, the PI3K-AKT pathway is activated and regulates key metabolic processes, such as glucose metabolism, molecules biosynthesis to support both systemic metabolic homeostasis metabolism of cells [107]. In tumor cells, oncogenic activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway reprograms cellular metabolism by augmenting the activity of metabolic enzymes through the key downstream substrates: TSC2, GSK3, and the FOXO transcription factors [108]. As noted above, however, several studies have reported that ZNF703 activated the PI3K/AKT pathway [44,45,54], which played a major role in tumor metabolism [109]. We therefore speculate that ZNF703 affects tumor metabolism, and encourage studies exploring associated mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. Imaging combined with serological marker detection has been applied to tumor screening. And it was also reported that ZNF703 could be detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with ovarian cancer by hybrid capture-NGS based on liquid biopsy [58]. Actually, liquid biopsy markers include circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, extracellular vesicles, and exosomes [110,111]. Liquid biopsy has many limitations, including low abundance, specialized equipment and instruments, high fragmentation of ctDNA, spatial differences, sensitivity and specificity of detection methods [112,113]. These limitations will affect the detection of ZNF703 expression. The clinical application of ZNF703 as a potential biomarker for liquid biopsy needs further investigation. Tumor progression and metastasis also require metabolic changes [114]. Many ZNF protein post-translational modifications (e.g. phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, methylation, glycosylation, and hydroxylation) alter protein function. No reports currently exist regarding the effects of post-translational modification on ZNF703 function, but it is known to be modified by various enzymes at multiple natural modification sites (as mentioned above). It is worth investigating, for example, whether modified ZNF703 can compete with unmodified ZNF703 to interfere with its carcinogenic activities.

ZNF703 plays a pivotal role in embryonic development and tumor emergence and progression, including acquisition of resistance to chemotherapy and other antineoplastic drugs. Oncogenic mechanisms of ZNF703 depend on the specific tumor microenvironment. It is still unknown how ZNF703 is translocated to the nucleus and how it regulates gene expression, as well as what its potential utility as a tumor biomarker. Research on therapeutic targeting of ZNF703 is lacking. In summary, multiple studies implicate ZNF703 in carcinogenesis, but mechanisms remain incomplete understood, which has impeded translation of findings into clinical practice. Future research could focus on: clarifying the mechanisms highlighted above, the potential utility of ZNF703 as a precision medicine biomarker and therapeutic target, and the simplest and most sensitive methods for detecting and therapeutically targeting ZNF703.

Author contribution statement

All authors listed have significantly contributed to the development and the writing of this article.

Data availability statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

Funding

This review was supported by grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82203702) and the Open Fund of Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics/Tianjin Key Laboratory of human development and reproductive regulation (2022XH08).

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements for all the members who help with this study.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20140.

Contributor Information

Shuang Wang, Email: swang93@cmu.edu.cn.

Rong Liu, Email: lr_yzxfck2023@sina.com.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is/are the supplementary data to this article.

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (234.5KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Belluti S., Rigillo G., Imbriano C. Transcription factors in cancer: when alternative splicing determines opposite cell fates [J] Cells. 2020;9(3) doi: 10.3390/cells9030760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zabidi M.A., Stark A. Regulatory enhancer-core-promoter communication via transcription factors and cofactors [J] Trends Genet. 2016;32(12):801–814. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lambert M., Jambon S., Depauw S., et al. Targeting transcription factors for cancer treatment [J] Molecules. 2018;23(6) doi: 10.3390/molecules23061479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vaquerizas J.M., Kummerfeld S.K., Teichmann S.A., et al. A census of human transcription factors: function, expression and evolution [J] Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10(4):252–263. doi: 10.1038/nrg2538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bradner J.E., Hnisz D., Young R.A. Transcriptional addiction in cancer [J] Cell. 2017;168(4):629–643. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garraway L.A., Lander E.S. Lessons from the cancer genome [J] Cell. 2013;153(1):17–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jen J., Wang Y.C. Zinc finger proteins in cancer progression [J] J. Biomed. Sci. 2016;23(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12929-016-0269-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abbehausen C. Zinc finger domains as therapeutic targets for metal-based compounds - an update [J] Metallomics. 2019;11(1):15–28. doi: 10.1039/c8mt00262b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Macpherson S., Larochelle M., Turcotte B. A fungal family of transcriptional regulators: the zinc cluster proteins [J] Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006;70(3):583–604. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dai K.S., Liew C.C. Characterization of a novel gene encoding zinc finger domains identified from expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of a human heart cDNA database [J] J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1998;30(11):2365–2375. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1998.0797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Klug A., Schwabe J.W. Protein motifs 5. Zinc fingers [J] FASEB J. 1995;9(8):597–604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mackay J.P., Crossley M. Zinc fingers are sticking together [J] Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998;23(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01168-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mccarty A.S., Kleiger G., Eisenberg D., et al. Selective dimerization of a C2H2 zinc finger subfamily [J] Mol Cell. 2003;11(2):459–470. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Razin S.V., Borunova V.V., Maksimenko O.G., et al. Cys2His2 zinc finger protein family: classification, functions, and major members [J] Biochemistry (Mosc.) 2012;77(3):217–226. doi: 10.1134/S0006297912030017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gauci S., Helbig A.O., Slijper M., et al. Lys-N and trypsin cover complementary parts of the phosphoproteome in a refined SCX-based approach [J] Anal. Chem. 2009;81(11):4493–4501. doi: 10.1021/ac9004309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou H., Di Palma S., Preisinger C., et al. Toward a comprehensive characterization of a human cancer cell phosphoproteome [J] J. Proteome Res. 2013;12(1):260–271. doi: 10.1021/pr300630k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nakamura M., Runko A.P., Sagerstrom C.G. A novel subfamily of zinc finger genes involved in embryonic development [J] J. Cell. Biochem. 2004;93(5):887–895. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pereira-Castro I., Costa A.M., Oliveira M.J., et al. Characterization of human NLZ1/ZNF703 identifies conserved domains essential for proper subcellular localization and transcriptional repression [J] J. Cell. Biochem. 2013;114(1):120–133. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Runko A.P., Sagerstrom C.G. Nlz belongs to a family of zinc-finger-containing repressors and controls segmental gene expression in the zebrafish hindbrain [J] Dev. Biol. 2003;262(2):254–267. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00388-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sagerstrom C.G., Kao B.A., Lane M.E., et al. Isolation and characterization of posteriorly restricted genes in the zebrafish gastrula [J] Dev. Dynam. 2001;220(4):402–408. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Runko A.P., Sagerstrom C.G. Isolation of nlz2 and characterization of essential domains in Nlz family proteins [J] J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279(12):11917–11925. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310076200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dutta S., Sriskanda S., Boobalan E., et al. nlz1 is required for cilia formation in zebrafish embryogenesis [J] Dev. Biol. 2015;406(2):203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pereira F., Duarte-Pereira S., Silva R.M., et al. Evolution of the NET (NocA, Nlz, Elbow, TLP-1) protein family in metazoans: insights from expression data and phylogenetic analysis [J] Sci. Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep38383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andreazzoli M., Broccoli V., Dawid I.B. Cloning and expression of noz1, a zebrafish zinc finger gene related to Drosophila nocA [J] Mech. Dev. 2001;104(1–2):117–120. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(01)00359-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chang C.W., Tsai C.W., Wang H.F., et al. Identification of a developmentally regulated striatum-enriched zinc-finger gene, Nolz-1, in the mammalian brain [J] Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004;101(8):2613–2618. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308645100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mcglinn E., Richman J.M., Metzis V., et al. Expression of the NET family member Zfp503 is regulated by hedgehog and BMP signaling in the limb [J] Dev. Dynam. 2008;237(4):1172–1182. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brown J.D., Dutta S., Bharti K., et al. Expression profiling during ocular development identifies 2 Nlz genes with a critical role in optic fissure closure [J] Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;106(5):1462–1467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812017106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lal S.M., Scalamogna A., Brooks C.S., et al. Cost effectiveness and accuracy of renal scans in the management of patients undergoing renal transplantation [J] Int. J. Artif. Organs. 1989;12(5):289–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation [J] Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reynisdottir I., Arason A., Einarsdottir B.O., et al. High expression of ZNF703 independent of amplification indicates worse prognosis in patients with luminal B breast cancer [J] Cancer Med. 2013;2(4):437–446. doi: 10.1002/cam4.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ooi A., Inokuchi M., Horike S.I., et al. Amplicons in breast cancers analyzed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization [J] Hum. Pathol. 2019;85:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kwek S.S., Roy R., Zhou H., et al. Co-amplified genes at 8p12 and 11q13 in breast tumors cooperate with two major pathways in oncogenesis [J] Oncogene. 2009;28(17):1892–1903. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Glodzik D., Purdie C., Rye I.H., et al. Mutational mechanisms of amplifications revealed by analysis of clustered rearrangements in breast cancers [J] Ann. Oncol. 2018;29(11):2223–2231. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sorlie T., Tibshirani R., Parker J., et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets [J] Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100(14):8418–8423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0932692100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Voutsadakis I.A. Amplification of 8p11.23 in cancers and the role of amplicon genes [J] Life Sci. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118729. 264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shi Y., Li J., Liu Y., et al. The long noncoding RNA SPRY4-IT1 increases the proliferation of human breast cancer cells by upregulating ZNF703 expression [J] Mol. Cancer. 2015;14:51. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0318-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xue-Liang J., Ming-Dong W., Ya-Bi Z., et al. Upregulated long noncoding RNA SPRY4-IT1 contributes to increased cell viability by activating zinc finger 703 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J] Indian J. Cancer. 2015;52(Suppl 3):E164–E167. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.186566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ren P., Hong X., Chang L., et al. Mol Carcinog; 2020. USF1-induced Overexpression of Long Noncoding RNA WDFY3-AS2 Promotes Lung Adenocarcinoma Progression via Targeting miR-491-5p/ZNF703 axis [J] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xu G., Zhang Y., Li N., et al. LBX2-AS1 up-regulated by NFIC boosts cell proliferation, migration and invasion in gastric cancer through targeting miR-491-5p/ZNF703 [J] Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:136. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01207-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Guo J., Luo C., Yang Y., et al. MiR-491-5p, as a tumor suppressor, prevents migration and invasion of breast cancer by targeting ZNF-703 to regulate AKT/mTOR pathway [J] Cancer Manag. Res. 2021;13:403–413. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S279747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sircoulomb F., Nicolas N., Ferrari A., et al. ZNF703 gene amplification at 8p12 specifies luminal B breast cancer [J] EMBO Mol. Med. 2011;3(3):153–166. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Holland D.G., Burleigh A., Git A., et al. ZNF703 is a common Luminal B breast cancer oncogene that differentially regulates luminal and basal progenitors in human mammary epithelium [J] EMBO Mol. Med. 2011;3(3):167–180. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang J., Zhu L.S., Luo Y., et al. Transcription factor ZNF703 activates linc-UBC1 to stimulate the progression of glioma [J] Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24(6):3183–3189. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202003_20685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang H., Jiang W.Q., Cao Y., et al. Elevated ZNF703 protein expression is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for survival of the patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J. Dis. Markers. 2015;2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/640263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Orhan C., Bakir B., Dalay N., et al. ZNF703 is an important player in head and neck cancer [J] Clin. Otolaryngol. 2019;44(6):1080–1086. doi: 10.1111/coa.13450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yang X., Liu G., Li W., et al. Silencing of zinc finger protein 703 inhibits medullary thyroid carcinoma cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo [J] Oncol. Lett. 2020;19(1):943–951. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baykara O., Dalay N., Kaynak K., et al. ZNF703 Overexpression may act as an oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer [J] Cancer Med. 2016;5(10):2873–2878. doi: 10.1002/cam4.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ren P., Hong X., Chang L., et al. USF1-induced overexpression of long noncoding RNA WDFY3-AS2 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression via targeting miR-491-5p/ZNF703 axis [J] Mol. Carcinog. 2020;59(8):875–885. doi: 10.1002/mc.23181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang H., Xu H., Ma F., et al. Zinc finger protein 703 induces EMT and sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by transactivating CLDN4 expression [J] Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(4):225. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2422-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ma F., Bi L., Yang G., et al. ZNF703 promotes tumor cell proliferation and invasion and predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer [J] Oncol. Rep. 2014;32(3):1071–1077. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Slorach E.M., Chou J., Werb Z. Zeppo1 is a novel metastasis promoter that represses E-cadherin expression and regulates p120-catenin isoform expression and localization [J] Genes Dev. 2011;25(5):471–484. doi: 10.1101/gad.1998111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Christgen M., Steinemann D., Kuhnle E., et al. Lobular breast cancer: clinical, molecular and morphological characteristics [J] Pathol. Res. Pract. 2016;212(7):583–597. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2016.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li K., Wang J., Han J., et al. Overexpression of ZNF703 facilitates tumorigenesis and predicts unfavorable prognosis in patients with cholangiocarcinoma [J] Oncotarget. 2016;7(46):76108–76117. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wang H., Deng X., Zhang J., et al. Elevated expression of zinc finger protein 703 promotes cell proliferation and metastasis through PI3K/AKT/GSK-3beta signalling in oral squamous cell carcinoma [J] Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017;44(3):920–934. doi: 10.1159/000485360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yang G., Ma F., Zhong M., et al. ZNF703 acts as an oncogene that promotes progression in gastric cancer [J] Oncol. Rep. 2014;31(4):1877–1882. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.2997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gu Y., Wan C., Zhou G., et al. TYMSOS drives the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer cells by regulating ZNF703 via sponging miR-4739 [J] Cell Biol. Int. 2021;45(8):1710–1719. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yang X., Liu G., Zang L., et al. ZNF703 is overexpressed in papillary thyroid carcinoma tissues and mediates K1 cell proliferation [J] Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2020;26(1):355–364. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0494-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shen W., Shan B., Liang S., et al. Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA from patients with advanced ovarian cancer [J] Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2021;27 doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.581534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang S., Wang C., Liu O., et al. miRNA-651-3p regulates EMT in ovarian cancer cells by targeting ZNF703 and via the MEK/ERK pathway [J] Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022;619:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lapidot T., Sirard C., Vormoor J., et al. A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice [J] Nature. 1994;367(6464):645–648. doi: 10.1038/367645a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bolos V., Peinado H., Perez-Moreno M.A., et al. The transcription factor Slug represses E-cadherin expression and induces epithelial to mesenchymal transitions: a comparison with Snail and E47 repressors [J] J. Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 3):499–511. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Soo K., O'rourke M.P., Khoo P.L., et al. Twist function is required for the morphogenesis of the cephalic neural tube and the differentiation of the cranial neural crest cells in the mouse embryo [J] Dev. Biol. 2002;247(2):251–270. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Al-Hajj M., Wicha M.S., Benito-Hernandez A., et al. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells [J] Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100(7):3983–3988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530291100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.O'brien C.A., Pollett A., Gallinger S., et al. A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice [J] Nature. 2007;445(7123):106–110. doi: 10.1038/nature05372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Singh S.K., Hawkins C., Clarke I.D., et al. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells [J] Nature. 2004;432(7015):396–401. doi: 10.1038/nature03128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fillmore C.M., Kuperwasser C. Human breast cancer cell lines contain stem-like cells that self-renew, give rise to phenotypically diverse progeny and survive chemotherapy [J] Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(2):R25. doi: 10.1186/bcr1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Clarke M.F., Dick J.E., Dirks P.B., et al. Cancer stem cells--perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells [J] Cancer Res. 2006;66(19):9339–9344. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nguyen D.X., Bos P.D., Massague J. Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization [J] Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9(4):274–284. doi: 10.1038/nrc2622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Plaks V., Kong N., Werb Z. The cancer stem cell niche: how essential is the niche in regulating stemness of tumor cells? [J] Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16(3):225–238. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Aguilar-Gallardo C., Simon C. Cells, stem cells, and cancer stem cells [J] Semin. Reprod. Med. 2013;31(1):5–13. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1331792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Peiris-Pages M., Martinez-Outschoorn U.E., Pestell R.G., et al. Cancer stem cell metabolism [J] Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0712-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Iuchi S. Three classes of C2H2 zinc finger proteins [J] Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001;58(4):625–635. doi: 10.1007/PL00000885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Berg J.M. Zinc fingers and other metal-binding domains. Elements for interactions between macromolecules [J] J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265(12):6513–6516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pan S.T., Li Z.L., He Z.X., et al. Molecular mechanisms for tumour resistance to chemotherapy [J] Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2016;43(8):723–737. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Loibl S., Treue D., Budczies J., et al. Mutational diversity and therapy response in breast cancer: a sequencing analysis in the neoadjuvant GeparSepto trial [J] Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;25(13):3986–3995. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Moelans C.B., Van Maldegem C.M.G., Van Der Wall E., et al. Copy number changes at 8p11-12 predict adverse clinical outcome and chemo- and radiotherapy response in breast cancer [J] Oncotarget. 2018;9(24):17078–17092. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Marzbany M., Bishayee A., Rasekhian M. Increased expression of ZNF 703 in breast cancer tissue: an opportunity for RNAi-NSAID combinatorial therapy [J] Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2019;66(5):808–814. doi: 10.1002/bab.1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Akbari Asl E., Fallah Mehrabadi J., Afshar D., et al. Apoptotic effects of linum album extracts on AGS human gastric adenocarcinoma cells and ZNF703 oncogene expression [J] Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP. 2018;19(10):2911–2916. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.10.2911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mollashahee-Kohkan F., Saravani R., Khalili T., et al. Levisticum officinale extract triggers apoptosis and down-regulates ZNF703 gene expression in breast cancer cell lines [J] Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;8(2):119–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Farhan M., Wang H., Gaur U., et al. FOXO signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer [J] Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2017;13(7):815–827. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.20052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Janesick A., Tang W., Ampig K., et al. Znf703 is a novel RA target in the neural plate border [J] Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):8275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44722-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wang S., Wang C., Hu Y., et al. ZNF703 promotes tumor progression in ovarian cancer by interacting with HE4 and epigenetically regulating PEA15 [J] J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01770-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhang X., Mu X., Huang O., et al. Luminal breast cancer cell lines overexpressing ZNF703 are resistant to tamoxifen through activation of Akt/mTOR signaling [J] PLoS One. 2013;8(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jeon B.N., Kim M.K., Yoon J.H., et al. Two ZNF509 (ZBTB49) isoforms induce cell-cycle arrest by activating transcription of p21/CDKN1A and RB upon exposure to genotoxic stress [J] Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(18):11447–11461. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Meruvu S., Hugendubler L., Mueller E. Regulation of adipocyte differentiation by the zinc finger protein ZNF638 [J] J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286(30):26516–26523. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.212506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Nakamura M., Choe S.K., Runko A.P., et al. Nlz1/Znf703 acts as a repressor of transcription [J] BMC Dev. Biol. 2008;8:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-8-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Grice J., Noyvert B., Doglio L., et al. A simple predictive enhancer syntax for hindbrain patterning is conserved in vertebrate genomes [J] PLoS One. 2015;10(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Woolfe A., Elgar G. Comparative genomics using Fugu reveals insights into regulatory subfunctionalization [J] Genome Biol. 2007;8(4):R53. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hong C.S., Saint-Jeannet J.P. Znf703, a novel target of Pax3 and Zic1, regulates hindbrain and neural crest development in Xenopus [J] Genesis. 2017;55(12) doi: 10.1002/dvg.23082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wernet M.F., Meier K.M., Baumann-Klausener F., et al. Genetic dissection of photoreceptor subtype specification by the Drosophila melanogaster zinc finger proteins elbow and no ocelli [J] PLoS Genet. 2014;10(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ferrari A., Vincent-Salomon A., Pivot X., et al. A whole-genome sequence and transcriptome perspective on HER2-positive breast cancers [J] Nat. Commun. 2016;7 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Rooney C., Geh C., Williams V., et al. Characterization of FGFR1 locus in sqNSCLC reveals a broad and heterogeneous amplicon [J] PLoS One. 2016;11(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ng C.K., Martelotto L.G., Gauthier A., et al. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and alternative driver genetic alterations in breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification [J] Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0657-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cornen S., Guille A., Adelaide J., et al. Candidate luminal B breast cancer genes identified by genome, gene expression and DNA methylation profiling [J] PLoS One. 2014;9(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Springer S., Yi K.H., Park J., et al. Engineering targeted chromosomal amplifications in human breast epithelial cells [J] Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015;152(2):313–321. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3468-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Besser R.R., Ishahak M., Mayo V., et al. Engineered microenvironments for maturation of stem cell derived cardiac myocytes [J] Theranostics. 2018;8(1):124–140. doi: 10.7150/thno.19441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma [J] Asan U., Agency B.C.C., et al., editors. Nature. 2017;541(7636):169–175. doi: 10.1038/nature20805. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Analysis Working Group. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kelly G.M., Gatie M.I. Mechanisms regulating stemness and differentiation in embryonal carcinoma cells [J] Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/3684178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mccart Reed A.E., Kutasovic J.R., Lakhani S.R., et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: morphology, biomarkers and 'omics [J] Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0519-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Christgen M., Derksen P. Lobular breast cancer: molecular basis, mouse and cellular models [J] Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0517-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Nishan U., Damas-Souza D.M., Barbosa G.O., et al. New transcription factors involved with postnatal ventral prostate gland development in male Wistar rats during the first week [J] Life Sci. 2015;143:168–173. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kocarnik J.M., compton K., et al., editors. vol. 8. 2022. Cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019 [J] pp. 420–444. (JAMA Oncol). Global Burden Of Disease Cancer C. 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Yang Y., Cao Y. The impact of VEGF on cancer metastasis and systemic disease [J] Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022;86(Pt 3):251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.[Chinese expert consensus on antiangiogenic drugs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2019 edition)] [J] Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2019;22(7):401–412. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2019.07.01. Chinese Society Of Clinical Oncology E C O V T T E C O N-S C L C E G O A D F N-S C L C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Jaworska M., Szczudlo J., Pietrzyk A., et al. The Warburg effect: a score for many instruments in the concert of cancer and cancer niche cells [J] Pharmacol. Rep. 2023 Aug;75(4):876–890. doi: 10.1007/s43440-023-00504-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Liu X.S., Liu Z., Gerarduzzi C., et al. Somatic human ZBTB7A zinc finger mutations promote cancer progression [J] Oncogene. 2016;35(23):3071–3078. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.You M., Xie Z., Zhang N., et al. Signaling pathways in cancer metabolism: mechanisms and therapeutic targets [J] Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):196. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01442-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hoxhaj G., Manning B.D. The PI3K-AKT network at the interface of oncogenic signalling and cancer metabolism [J] Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2020;20(2):74–88. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0216-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wu X.L., Wang L.K., Yang D.D., et al. Effects of Glut1 gene silencing on proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells by targeting the TGF-beta/PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway [J] J. Cell. Biochem. 2018;119(2):2356–2367. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Alix-Panabieres C., Pantel K. Clinical applications of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA as liquid biopsy [J] Cancer Discov. 2016;6(5):479–491. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ignatiadis M., Lee M., Jeffrey S.S. Circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA: challenges and opportunities on the path to clinical utility [J] Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21(21):4786–4800. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Nikanjam M., Kato S., Kurzrock R. Liquid biopsy: current technology and clinical applications [J] J. Hematol. Oncol. 2022;15(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01351-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Li W., Liu J.B., Hou L.K., et al. Liquid biopsy in lung cancer: significance in diagnostics, prediction, and treatment monitoring [J] Mol. Cancer. 2022;21(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01505-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Teoh S.T., Lunt S.Y. Metabolism in cancer metastasis: bioenergetics, biosynthesis, and beyond [J] Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2018;10(2) doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (234.5KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES