Skip to main content
JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association logoLink to JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association
. 2023 Oct 31;61(266):787–790. doi: 10.31729/jnma.8289

Mean Distance of Mental Foramen from Inferior Border of Mandible among Patients Visiting the Outpatient Dental Department in a Tertiary Care Centre

Preeti Singh 1,, Biplob Adhikari 2, Sushmit Koju 1, Sujaya Gupta 3, Megha Pradhan 4, Deepa Gurung 5, Ujjwal Joshi 5
PMCID: PMC10579758  PMID: 38289782

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Among many anatomical landmarks in the human skull, the mental foramen is a stable landmark on the mandible. The diverse morphology of the mandible indicates the specific characteristics of such anatomical structures in each individual. The aim of this study was to find out the mean distance of mental foramen from the inferior border of the mandible visiting the Outpatient Dental Department in a tertiary care centre.

Methods:

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients undergoing orthopantomogram in the Outpatient Dental Department of a tertiary care centre from 3 February 2022 to 31 July 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee. The patients with complete dentition in the region of measurements were included in the study. A convenience sampling method was used. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% Confidence Interval.

Results:

Among 207 patients, the mean distance from the inferior border of the mandible to the lower border of the mental foramen was 11.83±1.83 mm (11.58-12.07, 95% Confidence Interval).

Conclusions:

The mean distance of mental foramen from the inferior border of the mandible was found to be similar to other studies done in similar settings.

Keywords: gender, mandible, mental foramen

INTRODUCTION

The mandible is the hardest facial bone pertaining to sexual dimorphism. Among many anatomical landmarks in the human skull, the mental foramen (MF) is a stable landmark.1 Anatomically, it lies near the apices of premolars and the opening of the foramen is directed outward, upward, and posteriorly. MF is a very important landmark for the deposition of local anaesthesia and during various dental-related surgeries. During infancy, MF is located relatively closer to the inferior border of the mandible near the apices of the first molar tooth bud. In permanent dentition, it moves forward and lies just below the second premolar.2

Orthopantomogram (OPG) is a reliable and easily available radiographic tool in dentistry. Localisation of MF using OPG can help to identify an individual's age and gender.3 Only a handful of literature is evident on the radiographic localisation of MF in Nepal.

The aim of this study was to find out the mean distance of mental foramen from the inferior border of the mandible visiting the Outpatient Dental Department in a tertiary care centre.

METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among the patients visiting the Outpatient Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology of Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Duwakot, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Data was collected from 3 February 2022 to 31 July 2022. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 2401202202). Patients were informed about the procedure and written informed consent was obtained. The patients with complete dentition in the region of measurements were included in the study. The radiographic images of the mental foramen and the borders of the mandible that were not distinctly visible, images containing artefacts, and alveolar crest resorption in the premolar and first molar regions were excluded from the study. A convenience sampling method was used. The sample size was calculated using the following formula:

n=Z2×σ2e2=1.962×1.6920.252=176

Where,

  • n = minimum required sample size

  • Z = 1.96 at 95% Confidence interval (CI)

  • p = standard deviation taken from published literature, 1.694

  • q = 1-p

  • e = margin of error

Hence, the minimum calculated sample size was 176. However, the final sample size taken was 207.

According to the criteria given by Yosue and Brooks appearance of MF was identified and type I MF (continuous) were included in the study.5 All the radiographs were taken using the Planmeca Proline 2006 EC machine with tube potential 60-80 KV, tube current 6-8 mA, total filtration 2.5 mm Al, focal spot 0.3 and time 18 s; using standard protocols. The radiographs were taken by a single radiographer. The collected radiographs were evaluated by Planmeca Romexis version 3.0.1 viewing software. The measurements were taken using the in-built tools of the software. The MF was located and marked on the image. The inferior border of the mandible was marked. The tangent from inferior border of the mandible was drawn to the lower border of the mental foramen on both the left and right sides of the arc All the measurements were taken in millimetres (mm). Three different readings were taken and their mean was used for further analysis to minimize intraobserver biases.

Data were entered using Microsoft Excel 2007 and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% CI.

RESULTS

Among 207 patients, the mean distance from the inferior border of the mandible to the lower border of the mental foramen was 11.83±1.83 mm (11.5812.07, 95% CI). A total of 105 (50.72%) were males and 102 (49.28%) were females. The total mean distance irrespective of arch side in males was 12.27±1.70 mm and for females 11.38±1.86 mm. The distance was 12.461±2.08 mm in males and 11.45±1.99 mm in females on the left side. Similarly, on the right side, the distance was 12.078±1.83 mm in males and 11.320±2.10 mm in females (Table 1).

Table 1. Distance of the lower border of mental foramen from the inferior border of the mandible (n= 207).

Mandibular arch side

Gender

Mean±SD (mm)

Left

Female

11.45±1.99

 

Male

12.46±2.08

 

Total

11.96±2.10

Right

Female

11.32±2.10

 

Male

12.08 ±1.83

 

Total

11.71±2.00

DISCUSSION

Morphological variations of the skeletal structures are expected depending upon the population, which emphasised the need of population-specific anatomical standards.6 The mandible is the strongest bone which can withstand extreme conditions and persists well preserved for a longer time. The stability of MF remains throughout life. Resorption of the alveolar process occurs above the MF accounting relatively constant distance from it to the lower border of mandible throughout the life.7,8 Due to the stability of the basal bone and MF, these points were considered reference points for the present study.

In the present study, the mean distance from the inferior border of the mandible to the lower border of the mental foramen on both sides was noteworthy in males (right= 12.08±1.83 mm, left= 12.46±2.08 mm) compared to females (right= 11.32±2.10 mm, left= 11.45±1.99 mm). Our findings were similar to other studies conducted in different parts of the world, where mean was found to be for male (right= 12.67±2.61 mm, left= 12.58±2.49 mm), female (right= 11.46±2.92 mm, left= 11.25±3.18 mm), male (right= 11.79±0.97 mm, left= 11.89±2.40 mm), female (right= 11.41±0.65 mm, left= 11.40±0.66 mm), male (right= 16.13±2.31 mm, left= 15.88±1.92 mm), (right= 12.89±0.61 mm, left= 13.1±0.65 mm) respectively.9-11

Present study concluded that there is a difference in the mean value of LBMF to IBM in males and females on both sides of the mandible. The logical explanation for the difference in these measurements can be explained on the basis of the fact that sexual hormones such as androgens and estrogen contribute to the development of a morphologic difference in craniofacial skeletons between the genders.12 The finding of the present study showed, irrespective of arch side the total mean distance of IBM to LBMF in males was 12.27±1.70 mm and for females 11.38±1.86 mm, in accordance with studies where the mean values for males were 11.84±1.83 mm, 16.01±2.12 mm and for female, 11.4±0.64 mm, 12.9±0.64 mm respectively.10,11 As revealed from the study results, distance below the mental foramen (IBM to LBMF) on the left and right had similar values in both genders (left= 11.96±2.10 mm, right= 11.71±2.00 mm).

The findings of the present study suggest the effective localization of mental foramen for deposition of local anaesthesia in various surgical procedures as the total mean distance from IBM to LBMF was found to be 11.83±1.83 mm as in the previous study where the total mean was 10.27±1.69 mm.13 MF is considered a peremptory anatomical landmark from various surgical, aesthetic, and forensic odontology aspects. Unfortunately, sometimes MF is misdiagnosed as a radiolucent lesion apical to the second premolar. In such circumstances, knowledge of its positioning is most important for leading any intraoral procedure.14,15 The findings of the present study highlighted the importance of mental foramen and its implication as an adjunct tool for gender determination in forensic odontology as well as the area where the local anaesthesia can be deposited effectively. The application of 3D techniques such as Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) along with the clinical correlations as well as statistical tests is recommended to validate the results. Further multicentric approach with a large sample size is advocated as the positioning of the MF is highly influenced by the projection of angulation.

The limitations of this study include a small sample size and a single-centre study. Furthermore, the localisation of mental foramen is highly influenced by the projection angle which may not have been uniform in all the cases in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean distance of mental foramen from the inferior border of the mandible was found to be similar to other studies done in similar settings.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge all the participants and technicians in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Duwakot, Bhaktapur, Nepal for their participation and technical support respectively.

Conflict of Interest

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ramakrishnan K, Sharma S, Sreeja C, Pratima DB, Aesha I, Vijayabanu B. Sex determination in forensic odontology: a review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S398–402. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mahima VG, Patil K, Srikanth H. Mental foramen for gender determination: a panoramic radiographic study. Medico-Legal Update. 2009;9(2):33–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haghanifar S, Rokouei M. Radiographic evaluation of the mental foramen in a selected Iranian population. Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Apr-Jun;20(2):150–2. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.52886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shalash M, Khallaf ME, Ali AR. Position and dimensions of the mental foramen and presence of the anterior loop in the Egyptian population: a retrospective CBCT study. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2020:44–110. doi: 10.1186/s42269-020-00364-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wical KE, Swoope CC. Studies of residual ridge resorption. I. Use of panoramic radiographs for evaluation and classification of mandibular resorption. J Prosthet Dent. 1974 Jul;32(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(74)90093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lindh C, Peterson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distance related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1995 Jun;6(2):96–103. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, Bicer I. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Oct;32(10):741–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01499.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yosue T, Brooks SL. The appearance of mental foramina on panoramic and periapical radiographs. II. experimental evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989 Oct;68(4):488–92. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90151-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chandra A, Singh A, Badni M, Jaiswal R, Agnihotri A. Determination of sex by radiographic analysis of mental foramen in North Indian population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):52–5. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.114556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Catovic A, Bergman V, Catic A, Seifert D, Poljak-Guberina R. Influence of sex, age, and presence of functional units on optical density and bone height of the mandible in the elderly. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2002 Sep 15;36(3):327–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vodanovic M, Dumancic J, Demo Z, Mihelic D. Determination of sex by discriminant functional analysis of mandibles from two Croatian archeological sites. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2006;40(3):263–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Amorim MM, Borini CB, de Castro Lopes SLP, Haiter-Neto F, Caria PHF. Morphological description of mandibular canal in panoramic radiographs of Brazilian subjects: association between anatomic characteristic and clinical procedures. Int J Morphol. 2009;27(4):1243–8. doi: 10.4067/S0717-95022009000400044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yosue T, Brooks SL. The appearance of mental foramina on panoramic radiographs. I. Evaluation of patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989 Oct;68(3):360–4. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90224-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Asrani V, Shah JS. Mental foramen: a predictor of age and gender and guide for various procedures. J Forensic Sci Med. 2018 Apr 1;4(2):76–84. doi: 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_2_18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pele A, Berry PA, Evanno C, Jordana F. Evaluation of mental foramen with cone beam computed tomography: a systematic review of literature. Radiol Res Pract. 2021 Jan 6;2021:8897275. doi: 10.1155/2021/8897275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association are provided here courtesy of Nepal Medical Association

RESOURCES