Abstract
The concept of immunological memory was demonstrated in antiquity when protection against re-exposure to pathogens was observed during the plague of Athens. Immunological memory has been linked with the adaptive features of T and B cells; however, in the past decade, evidence has demonstrated that innate immune cells can exhibit memory, a phenomenon called ‘innate immune memory’ or ‘trained immunity’. Innate immune memory is currently being defined and is transforming our understanding of chronic inflammation and autoimmunity. In this Review, we provide an up-to-date overview of the memory-like features of innate immune cells in inflammatory arthritis and the crosstalk between chronic inflammatory milieu and cell reprogramming. Aberrant pro-inflammatory signalling, including cytokines, regulates the metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming of haematopoietic progenitors, leading to exacerbated inflammatory responses and osteoclast differentiation, in turn leading to bone destruction. Moreover, imprinted memory on mature cells including terminally differentiated osteoclasts alters responsiveness to therapies and modifies disease outcomes, commonly manifested by persistent inflammatory flares and relapse following medication withdrawal.
Introduction
The concept of immune memory is increasingly gaining worldwide attention owing to its importance in the protection conferred by vaccines. Immune memory was initially considered a privilege of adaptive immune memory T and B cells1. However, substantial amounts of data have accumulated demonstrating that innate cells display adaptive-like features following exposure to exogenous or endogenous triggers, reflected by an altered secondary response to subsequent triggers, a phenomenon termed ‘trained immunity’2 (Box 1). This concept described the intriguing ability of natural killer cells and macrophages, as prototypical innate immune cells, to mount a hyper-inflammatory response to a secondary challenge3,4. This memory phenotype of innate immune cells constitutes an interesting therapeutic tool to confer protection against viral infections5,6 and control of cancer progression7,8. However, a sustained capacity of innate immune cells to respond positively to inflammatory triggers leads to systemic autoinflammatory disorders9. This phenomenon is particularly relevant in inflammatory arthritis, wherein inappropriate activation of the immune system leads to chronic systemic inflammation and tissue destruction.
Box 1. Innate immune memory or ‘trained immunity’.
The past decade has challenged the classical immune response dogma, highlighting the capacity of innate immune cells to build an immunological memory, a phenomenon called ‘trained immunity’ or ‘innate memory’58. Originally, evidence for the existence of innate memory was derived from clinical and experimental studies showing the non-specific, T and B cell-independent protection conferred by bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine and by β-glucan challenge to secondary infections130–132. Depending on the type of activating ligand (pathogen-associated molecular patterns, damage-associated molecular patterns or cytokines) and the signalling pathway engaged by the first antigenic exposure, innate immune cells display characteristics of trained immunity as evidenced by substantial phenotypic and functional modifications. These alterations include an altered expression of membrane markers, such as pattern-recognition receptors (Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), TLR4, the β-glucan receptor dectin-1)131,133,134, co-stimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80, CD86, CD83)132,133, C-type lectin receptors (CD206, CD209)132,133 and chemokine receptors (CCR1, CCR2, CXCR4)126,132, which modulates the cellular interaction with the extracellular milieu. Long-lasting heightened capacity to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF) and chemokines (CCL2, CCL5) usually accompanies the phenotypic modifications126,131,133. Conversely, innate immune cells can also retain a hypo-responsive memory as a long-term adaptation to chronic inflammatory conditions135, a phenotype initially called innate immune tolerance. Thus, macrophages exposed to persistent or high-dose lipopolysaccharide or some helminth products display a blunted immune reaction with a shift towards an anti-inflammatory cytokine balance133,136. Adaptive-like behaviour has since been evidenced in a broader population of immune cells (group 2 and group 3 innate lymphoid cells137,138), and non-immune cells (including haematopoietic stem cells22,23 and skin epithelial cells139) that contribute to tissue homeostasis140. Intertwined metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming underlie the phenomenon of innate memory induction4. Among several metabolic pathways, the modulation of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation seems to be the main regulator of the epigenetic rewiring in innate memory induction60. Metabolites generated from the altered metabolic process modulate the activity of histone-modifying enzymes that either repress or enhance chromatin accessibility135,141. Importantly, such alterations can occur at the level of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. The release of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IFN-γ, IFN-α and IFN-β), pathogen-associated molecular patterns and damage-associated molecular patterns during chronic inflammation and infection shapes the epigenetic landscape of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, which are responsible for the induction of long-lasting specific memory phenotypes in myeloid cells22,23,25,142.
Inflammatory arthritis describes a group of diseases that includes rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), which clinically involve joint and skin damage, and systemically extend to vital organs such as the lungs, heart, kidneys and nervous system10. T and B cells have long been implicated as the principal mediators of autoimmunity; these cells contribute to inflammation persistence via the expression of highly specific antigen receptors, which enable them to rapidly express effector molecules and mature isotype-switched antibodies upon re-challenge by the same antigen11. The resulting memory T and B cells persist in the circulation, lymphoid organs and inflamed tissue, where they can sense their specific antigen. In rheumatic diseases, chronic antigen persistence constitutes a continuous challenge to T and B cells; accordingly, memory T cells adapt to this chronic inflammatory milieu and display an impaired phenotype with an incapacity to activate regulatory T cells, which, when activated, suppress immune responses and achieve self-tolerance12. Similarly, memory B cells differentiate into memory plasma cells that localize in the bone marrow where the cytokine milieu promotes their sustained production of pathogenic antibodies13. The immunological memory of rheumatic inflammation as it relates to T and B cells is well appreciated and has been reviewed elsewhere14. However, a large proportion of patients with inflammatory arthritis are either resistant to conventional immunosuppressive therapies targeting T and B cells15,16 or experience a relapse after immunosuppression is discontinued17,18. Moreover, the reset of pathogenic adaptive immunological memory through an intense myeloablation followed by autologous stem cell transplantation fails to achieve long-term, sustained remission in all patients, suggesting that other immune memory pathways contribute to disease chronicity independently of T and B cells19–21. The observation of this phenomenon initiated a number of studies around the effect of joint inflammation on the epigenetic imprinting and residual memory of synovial fibroblasts (Box 2, Fig. 1).
Box 2. Immunological memory in synovial fibroblasts.
Synovial fibroblasts are important contributors to the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis, and their phenotypic and functional modifications are extensively studied in this setting. Despite their non-immune origin, synovial fibroblasts express a large array of pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) including the Toll-like receptors TLR2, TLR3 and TLR4, and are able to respond to stimuli by producing various cytokines and chemokines143. Synovial fibroblasts exhibit an aggressive phenotype in inflammatory arthritis characterized by the expression of cadherin 11 and podoplanin144,145. These fibroblasts are pivotal in the maintenance of inflammation chronicity and the promotion of osteoclastogenesis owing to their increased proliferation and invasiveness and an enhanced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), chemokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)144,146–148. Early observations demonstrated that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial fibroblasts exhibit altered chromatin organization with a prolonged mRNA transcription of pro-inflammatory mediators following stimulation by TNF149. Chronic exposure to TNF consolidates these histone modifications and enhances the capacity of these cells to produce pro-inflammatory chemokines following stimulation by interferons150. Consistently, extensive genomics studies of synovial fibroblasts from patients with RA showed substantial alterations in the epigenetic landscape, including DNA methylation, histone modifications and microRNA expression151,152.
Analysis of the transcriptional network and chromatin accessibility of synovial fibroblasts showed an enrichment of enhancer marker H3K27ac upstream of the TNFSF11 locus (encoding receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand) and identified the transcription factor ETS1 as responsible for the pathogenic polarization of tissue-destructive fibroblasts in chronic arthritis153. In addition, in experimental arthritis, repeated injection of monosodium urate crystals and/or zymosan aggravates arthritis outcomes through the inflammatory sensitization of synovial fibroblasts, which acquire an enhanced capacity for migration, invasiveness and osteoclastogenesis154. This inflammatory ‘imprinting’ is dependent on sustained activity of the serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR–hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) pathway and the NLRP3 inflammasome, and a shift towards enhanced glycolysis, which is reminiscent of the metabolic basis of trained macrophages upon β-glucan stimulation65. Similar studies have demonstrated that chronic exposure to TNF in vitro increases glycolysis in synovial fibroblasts, in a GLUT1–HIF-1α-dependent manner, which confirms the metabolic shift that occurs in chronically inflamed synovial fibroblasts in RA155. This inflammatory imprinting can be abrogated by the inhibition of bromodomain proteins, which translate epigenetic changes into transcription156. Collectively, these findings support the concept that under chronic inflammatory conditions, synovial fibroblasts acquire a memory-like phenotype that closely resembles adaptive immunity (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 |. Inflammatory imprinting of synovial fibroblasts in arthritis.

In inflammatory arthritis, several stages of inflammatory imprinting contribute to the synovial fibroblast phenotype. 1) A subset of synovial fibroblasts express cadherin 11, podoplanin and a wide array of pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), which are activated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS) from infiltrating pathogens, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) released during tissue damage-induced inflammation, and pro-inflammatory cytokines. 2) Activation of signalling pathways downstream of PRRs and cytokine receptors reprogrammes the cellular metabolic machinery towards increased glycolysis and induces epigenetic modifications. 3) These epigenetic modifications augment the sensitivity of synovial fibroblasts to inflammatory stimuli and enhance their capacity to produce inflammatory mediators and to activate osteoclastogenesis. 4) The liberation of DAMPS and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the synovial milieu upon tissue degradation and bone loss acts as an antigenic challenge to synovial fibroblasts, triggering an enhanced secondary inflammatory response and thus perpetuating the disease. MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κΒ ligand; TLR, Toll-like receptor.
More recent mechanistic evidence of this phenomenon comes from a number of observations that involve innate immune training. In one study, β-glucan innate immune training was associated with enhanced recovery of myelopoiesis following chemotherapy-induced myeloablation22. This myeloid ‘skewing’ is dependent on IL-1β and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM–CSF) signalling, and results in specific metabolomic and transcriptomic alterations of the medullar haematopoietic progenitors22. Similar observations were noted with bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccine23,24 and/or with metabolic changes induced by intake of a Western diet25; in all cases, haematopoietic progenitors evolved to a ‘trained state’ of myeloid cells with heightened immune responsiveness (Box 1). Such training adaptations of myeloid progenitors might increase their susceptibility to inflammatory signals in inflammatory arthritis, thus generating a vicious circle that perpetuates the disease and creates a barrier against effective therapy26. Understanding the mechanisms that drive the induction of immunological memory in innate immune cells and their consequences for the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases is fundamental for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Herein we discuss the latest findings related to the adaptive-like features of innate immune cells that support their role in the persistence of joint inflammation and bone loss, and provide an up-to-date overview of the potential involvement of innate immune memory in the variability of clinical outcomes and treatment response in patients with inflammatory arthritis.
Innate immune memory in inflammatory arthritis
Innate immune cells play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis by orchestrating at different levels the inflammation cascade and its resolution. Circulating monocytes and tissue macrophages are on the front line in danger signal sensing, antigen presentation and cytokine production, thus modulating the activity of a large array of cellular subtypes including T and B cells as well as fibroblasts, which have also been shown to display phenotypic characteristics reminiscent of immunological memory27 (Box 2). A finely tuned balance between the pro-inflammatory and regulatory functions of macrophages is required for tissue homeostasis. This dual activity is possible because of the high level of heterogeneity in macrophage origin and function, and is achieved via continuous specialization and differentiation driven by the integration of multiple signals from the surrounding microenvironment28. The bone marrow milieu is critical for myeloid progenitors, which express a wide array of cytokine and growth factor receptors to sense peripheral inflammation and adapt via active proliferation22.
Maladaptive myelopoiesis in inflammatory arthritis
The adaptation of bone marrow myelopoiesis to an inflammatory microenvironment is complex and involves multiple signals, including cytokines, growth factors and pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) signalling26. Data from animal models showed that gene transfer of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-23 and IL-17 expands myeloid populations in the bone marrow29,30. Disease severity in those animal models of inflammatory arthritis was directly related to the expansion of multiple myeloid progenitors, including CD11b+ Gr1low monocytes and CD11b+ Gr1high neutrophils. Within the expanded monocyte population, there was a significant increase in osteoclast precursors expressing both receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 (M-CSF) receptor, which renders them hyper-resorptive. Notably, these cells retained their hyper-responsiveness to RANK ligand (RANKL) signalling in ex vivo cultures even after removal from the bone marrow29. Similar to pre-osteoclasts, adoptive transfer of bone marrow neutrophils from IL-17A-overexpressing mice to naive mice was sufficient to induce skin inflammation, suggesting that neutrophils isolated from diseased mice retain pathogenic characteristics31. Inflammatory arthritis has also been linked to increased myelopoiesis and innate immune training of myeloid cells within the bone marrow. Specifically, experimental periodontitis induced an expansion of myeloid cells and the epigenetic reprogramming of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) through the overactivation of IL-1β signalling, leading to increased susceptibility to inflammatory stimuli32. Similar to the IL-23 and IL-17 gene transfer models, the expansion of monocytes and neutrophils exacerbated inflammatory arthritis; more importantly, the study elegantly demonstrated that this maladaptive innate training of myelopoiesis is transmissible by bone marrow transplantation32.
In experimental inflammatory arthritis, γδ T cells, which regulate the activation of polymorphonuclear neutrophils through granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, GM–CSF and M-CSF33,34, orchestrate skin and joint pathology35. The contribution of these pathways in the pathogenesis of SpA is of paramount importance as IL-17A+ γδ T cells and IL-17A+ GM–CSF+ γδ T cells have been identified in patients with SpA36,37. Similarly, natural killer cell-derived GM–CSF was shown to potentiate inflammatory arthritis, providing yet another mechanism of maladaptive myelopoiesis38. Moreover, maladaptive myelopoiesis is not an autonomous event but is rather shaped by the dysregulation of the cytokine milieu and the impairment of lymphoid cell function under arthritic conditions, which often results in excessive osteolytic activity39,40. Collectively, these data illustrate the link between trained myelopoiesis in the bone marrow and its effects on monocytes and neutrophils that egress to the circulation and subsequently to the joint and other tissues, where they exacerbate inflammatory arthritis and perpetuate chronic inflammatory disorders (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 |. Peripheral inflammation and maladaptive bone marrow myelopoiesis.

Early inflammatory events in inflammatory arthritis are shaped by various stimuli, including infection, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) and the local cytokine milieu, which induce the activation of local and peripheral immune cells. These activated cells release pro-inflammatory cytokines and factors that support the expansion of myeloid cells, which induce metabolic and epigenetic modifications in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). These modifications result in increased osteoclast formation in the bone marrow, which enhances the egress of bone-marrow cells, including neutrophils, and memory imprinting of bone marrow myeloid cells with a skewing towards enhanced myelopoiesis and inflammatory hyper-responsiveness. The trained myeloid cells generated are recruited to different organs and inflamed tissues, where they mount a heightened secondary response, thereby supporting the proliferation of activated neutrophils and the oligoclonal expansion of γδ T cells. The enhanced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines promotes the recruitment of the trained monocytes and osteoclast precursors to the inflamed joint, resulting in exacerbated tissue destruction and inflammation that perpetuates the maladaptive inflammatory memory cycle. GM–CSF, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1; NK, natural killer; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; RBC, red blood cell; TH17, T helper 17.
Macrophage memory in inflammatory arthritis
During the onset of inflammatory arthritis, synovial macrophages are not only dramatically increased in number41 but also adopt a potent pro-inflammatory profile42. This pro-inflammatory profile includes the upregulation of TLRs (TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9), co-stimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD276) and chemokine receptors (CCR3 and CCR5), which results in increased production of IL-1β, TNF and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1)43,44. Despite the observed differences in the activation states of inflammatory macrophages in RA and PsA45, the innate immune activation or ‘trained immunity’ mechanisms might be shared across a number of rheumatic diseases. Indeed, monocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus also show an upregulation of CD80, CD86, HLA-DR, CX3CR1 (ref. 46), the activating Fcγ receptor FcγRI (CD64)47 and CD40 ligand48, along with a heightened production of IL-6 and IL-23 (ref. 49) and of TNF50 upon ex vivo stimulation. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have elevated levels of oxidized LDL51, which activates NLRP3 in macrophages and induces a long-lasting memory phenotype through IL-1β production25. In addition, circulating monocytes from patients with RA display a phenotype of metabolic and inflammatory dysfunction that precedes their accumulation in the joints and clinical manifestation of the disease52.
The increased frequency of trained monocytes in the synovium of individuals with arthralgia and positive autoantibodies but no clinical signs of inflammation reflects the deleterious impact of macrophage reprogramming, and can be used to identify individuals at risk of developing arthritis and predict the severity of erosive inflammatory arthritis52. Early observations have shown that chronic exposure of macrophages to low doses of IFN-γ and TNF induces a shift towards pro-inflammatory signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1)-dominated responses53,54. In a series of elegant experiments, it was demonstrated that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge of macrophages pre-treated with IFN-γ resulted in profound chromatin remodelling, characterized by histone acetylation of promoters at the TNF, IL6 and IL12B loci and a prolonged binding of the transcription factors STAT1 and interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1). This epigenetic modification, originally described as ‘priming’, did not result in the transcription of these factors but rather enabled a stronger immune response upon secondary activation55. These experiments clearly indicated how the altered cytokine milieu in inflammatory disorders might promote a ‘priming’ or ‘training’ of macrophages, and implicate the existence of residual innate transcriptional memory. Although IFN-γ priming induces the formation of de novo latent enhancers via the activation of STAT1 and IRF elements to activate gene transcription and recruit chromatin-remodelling enzymes56, immune training is characterized by the acquisition of persistent histone modifications, such as H3K27 acetylation at distal enhancers and H3K4 trimethylation at the promoters of stimulated genes57, suggesting that the mechanisms of priming and training might be partially distinct.
Mechanistically, the induction of trained immunity has been closely associated with an active interplay between epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming58. Indeed, macrophages exposed to pro-inflammatory stimuli are characterized by an enhanced glycolytic influx and a fragmented tricarboxylic acid cycle, leading to the accumulation of intermediate metabolites such as succinate and acetyl coenzyme A59 that serve as cofactors for epigenetic remodelling enzymes60. The analysis of circulating monocytes and synovial macrophages in patients with inflammatory arthritis has demonstrated increased glycolysis and an altered fatty acid metabolism, which could explain the accumulation of intermediate metabolites such as succinate and glutamate in the synovial fluid of inflamed joints61,62. Importantly, these metabolic abnormalities correlate with an enhanced capacity of arthritic monocytes to release pro-inflammatory factors upon ex vivo stimulation52,63.
Besides the role of the hypoxic microenvironment, the increased level of syntenin-1 in inflamed joints was also shown to amplify the inflammatory and glycolytic networks of synovial macrophages through serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR signalling64, in line with the training effects of β-glucan65.
Following these observations, several epigenome-wide association studies have provided strong evidence for the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in the aetiology of rheumatic diseases66. Among the multiple epigenetic signatures described in patients with inflammatory arthritis, the acetylation of histone H3 as well as the trimethylation of H3K4 (refs. 67,68) and H3K27 (ref. 69) at the promoter site of genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6)70,71 and chemokines (CCL2)72 are amongst the mechanisms involved in innate memory induction. Modifications of the microRNA signature of macrophages, which interfere with TNF, mitogen-activated protein kinase and Wnt signalling cascades73, participate in innate immune memory via the modulation of chromatin remodelling factors74–76. Moreover, the altered expression of ten-eleven translocation (TET) and DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) enzymes, which regulate DNA methylation, has been reported in the monocytes of patients with RA, and the subsequent methylome change correlated with disease activity and therapeutic intervention77,78. Importantly, the observed transcriptomic heterogeneity and DNA methylome alteration amongst rheumatic monocytes is attributed to cytokine priming or training, modulated partly by IL-1β, TNF and interferon signalling77,79, demonstrating the critical role of the inflammatory synovial milieu in genetic imprinting (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3 |. Macrophage immune memory in inflammatory arthritis.

a, Proinflammatory cytokines, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS) constitute immunological triggers that induce metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming, leading to macrophage memory in inflammatory arthritis. Downstream signalling via pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) and cytokine receptors promotes NLRP3 inflammasome activation, metabolic reprogramming (increased glycolysis and/or oxidative phosphorylation) and epigenetic rewiring (increased H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation), modulating gene transcription leading to increased expression of co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD276, PRRs and chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5. These alterations are imprinted in macrophages and persist after the initial triggers are removed. The re-exposure of the reprogrammed macrophages to inflammatory stimuli induces a heightened secondary response, characterized by increased production of TNF, IL-1β and IL-6, that perpetuates joint inflammation. b, Conversely, exposure to DMARDs (such as methotrexate and TNF-blocking agents) upregulates the NF-κB suppressor protein A20, and hampers the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) signalling pathway, which dampens the immune responsiveness of macrophages, prevents hyperinflammatory epigenetic imprinting and induces long-lasting immunoregulatory properties characterized by a shift towards augmented secretion of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, a reduced transcription of pro-inflammatory TNF and IL6 and a downregulation of co-stimulatory molecules and PRRs. Additional receptors including the tyrosine protein kinase (MerTK) receptor are associated with a regulatory macrophage phenotype via the upregulation of suppressor of cytokine signalling 1 (SOCS1) and SOCS3 but its role in inflammatory arthritis is uncertain (depicted by the dashed arrows). NF-κB, nuclear factor κB.
Macrophage memory and resolution of inflammatory arthritis
Although the effects of macrophage training in driving inflammatory arthritis are now well appreciated, emerging data point towards a protective role of certain macrophage phenotypes, associated with resolution of inflammatory arthritis. In 2020, a study in a large cohort of patients with RA showed that the expression of tyrosine protein kinase Mer (MerTK) by a specific subtype of tissue macrophages was predominant in the synovium of patients who maintained remission after drug withdrawal. Synovial MerTK+ macrophages from patients with RA showed an immunoregulatory transcriptomic signature and a heightened capacity for IL-10 production upon ex vivo stimulation80. MerTK belongs to the TAM receptor family, associated with inhibiting innate immune response through the upregulation of suppressor of cytokine signalling 1 (SOCS1) and SCOS3 (refs. 81,82) (Fig. 3). Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether the expression of MerTK by synovial macrophages during drug-free remission is merely a marker of re-established tissue homeostasis or MerTK effectively governs the restoration of immune homeostasis in the joint. Further studies are necessary to formally establish a causal link between MerTK expression and the induction of an immunoregulatory memory-like macrophage phenotype and, more importantly, to identify the immunological mechanisms that lead to its emergence in the context of inflammatory arthritis.
More evidence of the potential involvement of macrophage innate memory in the resolution of inflammatory arthritis comes from studies deciphering the favourable response of patients with RA to early treatment with DMARDs83. For instance, it has been shown that the incubation of RA macrophages with TNF-blocking agents results in the downregulation of the co-stimulatory molecules CD40 and CD80 and a heightened capacity for IL-10 production84. Furthermore, methotrexate-exposed human macrophages fail to produce IL-6 and IL-1β following exposure to inflammatory stimuli, through the upregulation of the NF-κB suppressor protein A20, which controls excessive macrophage-mediated inflammation by inhibiting NF-kB signalling85. Importantly, A20 expression is induced through epigenetic modification at its promoter via increased H3K4 methyltransferase activity86. Other studies have shown that methotrexate therapy is able to reverse aberrant epigenetic modifications in immune cells from patients with RA by targeting DNA methylation78, but data on its effects on histone methylation are still lacking.
Innate memory in erosive arthritis
Our current understanding clearly supports the presence of adaptive-like features amongst circulating monocytes and synovial macrophages in inflammatory arthritis. These features negatively and positively regulate the extent of bone resorption in erosive arthritis. Bone resorption in inflammatory arthritis is largely controlled by osteoclasts, which are specialized cells found on trabecular and endosteal cortical bone surfaces. Multinucleated osteoclasts derive from the fusion of haematopoietic myeloid progenitors following RANKL and M-CSF signalling, which induces the transcription of genes involved in bone resorption function (NFATC1, TNFRSF11A, FMS, ACP5, CTSK, MMP9 and ATP6V0D2)87,88. The exact osteoclast precursor is yet to be defined but derives from HSPCs, which differentiate into various cells including synovial macrophages and immature dendritic cells89. Synovial macrophages are capable of osteoclast differentiation and therefore any aforementioned ‘priming’ or ‘training’ of these cell populations is likely to affect the extent of bone destruction and erosive severity of inflammatory arthritis90. Therefore, the expansion of myeloid cells in inflammatory arthritis is directly linked to trained immunity of HSPCs and synovial osteoclast precursors.
In inflammatory arthritis, multiple pathways contribute to the terminal differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts91. For instance, IL-17A promotes the expansion of IL-17RA+ CD11b+ Gr1low osteoclast precursors in the bone marrow and induces the expression of RANK and M-CSF receptor, rendering these cells hyper-responsive to osteoclast differentiation signalling30,92. Other pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-23 and TNF, can affect intracellular calcium signalling, which affects the differentiation of osteoclast precursors via the activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1)93,94. IL-23 also activates innate immunoreceptors such as myeloid DAP12-associating lectin 1 (MDL-1), a C-type lectin that pairs with DAP12 (TYRO protein tyrosine kinase-binding protein) receptor and activates the transcription factors PU.1 and NFATc1, which are essential in osteoclast differentiation93,95. Activation of these immunoreceptors is critical in inflammatory arthritis as it not only induces myelopoiesis, but also affects osteoclast differentiation via co-stimulatory pathways. The immunoreceptor macrophage-inducible C-type lectin (Mincle) also shifts osteoclast metabolism towards oxidative phosphorylation, associated with an enhanced migration and bone-resorption capacity96. These activation pathways mimic the RANK signalling pathway, which reprogrammes the metabolic machinery of osteoclast precursors and mature osteoclasts towards enhanced glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation97,98. Under arthritic conditions, this metabolic reprogramming is synergized by the highly hypoxic synovial milieu that suppresses the expression of the negative regulator COMM domain-containing protein 1, resulting in enhanced osteoclastogenesis99.
Epigenetic modifications have not only been documented to lead to the activation of pro-osteoclastogenic genes such as MMP9 but are also responsible for the repression of negative regulators of osteoclastogenesis such as IRF8 (ref. 100). A 2022 study demonstrated that exposure of macrophages to TGFβ increases the chromatin accessibility at osteoclastic gene loci and induces IRF8 degradation in response to TNF stimulation101. Epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, influence the transcription factors PU.1, NFATc1 and IRF8 and control osteoclast differentiation and function97,98,102. It is evident that immunoreceptors such as MDL-1 and Siglec-15 are modulating DAP12 co-stimulatory pathways93,103. However, it is not clear whether immunoreceptors that are associated with trained immunity and epigenetic modifications in osteoclast precursors continue to affect terminally differentiated osteoclasts104.
The notion that innate immune memory occurs not only in HSPCs, synovial macrophages and other osteoclast precursors, but also in terminally differentiated osteoclasts, which are thought to be incapable of conferring memory, was implied by a 2021 study. Advanced imaging analysis revealed that terminally differentiated osteoclasts divide into smaller cells called osteomorphs, a phenomenon distinct from apoptosis105. Restimulation of the osteomorphs with RANKL re-induces their fusion into mature bone-resorbing osteoclasts with a heightened capacity to respond to RANKL differentiation signals. Interestingly, osteomorphs exhibit an altered transcriptomic signature compared with osteoclasts and/or macrophage precursors, with an upregulation of several novel genes (including Ccr3, Axl, Vcam1, Cal1 and Cd74) involved in both bone tissue homeostasis and immune regulation105. This novel concept is supported by clinical studies reporting the rebound phenomenon of accelerated bone loss and increased vertebral fracture in patients several months after discontinuation of anti-RANKL treatment106. Indeed, this newly described recycling mechanism of osteoclasts that leads to the production of primed osteomorphs that fuse and respond rapidly to changing conditions closely resembles the phenomenon of trained immunity58. Although the factors involved in the regulation of osteoclast recycling, as well as the epigenetic changes associated with the cell priming, trained immunity and differentiation, still need to be defined, these findings substantially enhance our understanding of bone erosion in inflammatory arthritis and introduce innate immune memory as a plausible target to control aberrant osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption91.
In addition to innate immune memory and osteoclast bone-resorbing function, the shared myeloid origin of the monocytes/macrophage lineage and dendritic cells supports the idea that osteoclasts might exhibit potent immune properties, thereby regulating the inflammatory process in pathological conditions. Indeed, upon treatment with RANKL, osteoclasts secrete CCL3, CCL4, CCL5 and CXCL10 chemokines, thus affecting T cell migration107. In addition, stimulation of osteoclasts with LPS upregulates the expression of MHC II and the co-stimulatory molecules CD80, CD86 and CD40, along with notable production of the cytokines IL-6, TNF, IL-1β and IL-10 (ref. 108). Interestingly, in a mouse model of colitis with severe bone destruction, osteoclasts exhibited an upregulation of the chemokine receptor CX3CR1, which promoted TNF-producing CD4+ T cells in an IL-17A-dependent manner, whereas osteoclasts deriving from the bone marrow of control mice (without colitis) induced the immunosuppressive FOXP3+CD4+ T cell subset109. More recently, a transcriptomic analysis performed in ovariectomized mice, a model in which osteoclastogenesis is driven by TNF and RANKL-producing CD4+ T cells, identified CX3CR1+ and CX3CR1− osteoclasts subsets that contrasted considerably in transcriptional and functional aspects, thus supporting the heterogeneity of osteoclasts in the context of chronic inflammation110.
Collectively, this evidence indicates that innate immune memory could regulate multiple functions of terminally differentiated osteoclasts, including recycling in the form of osteomorphs, increased bone resorption and/or modulating immune responses in the bone microenvironment (Fig. 4), which need to be further investigated in future studies.
Fig. 4 |. Memory imprinting of osteoclasts during chronic inflammation.

Under arthritic conditions, the release of IL-23, IL-17, TNF and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) by activated immune cells promotes the differentiation of osteoclast progenitors and synovial macrophages into mature osteoclasts. Inflammatory osteoclasts have increased expression of immunoreceptors MDL-1, Mincle, Siglec-15 and DAP-12, which act as co-stimulators of osteoclast differentiation in addition to receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK), and display a metabolic shift towards increased glycolysis. The activation process is also accompanied by epigenetic changes that enhance accessibility to osteoclastic genes by modulating the transcriptional regulation of transcription factor PU1, nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFATc1) and interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8). Once the stimulatory signal is removed, the mature osteoclasts undergoes a fission that results in the formation of smaller, more motile daughter cells described as osteomorphs. The osteomorphs undergo substantial transcriptomic changes but retain the ability to fuse, upon stimulation with RANKL, into mature osteoclasts with an enhanced osteolytic activity. Furthermore, chronic inflammatory conditions confer to the osteoclasts the ability to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and the upregulation of activating membrane markers such as co-stimulatory molecules (CD40 and CD80) and the chemokine receptor CX3CR1, resulting in the activation of immune cells, which aggravates the inflammatory process within the joint. M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1; VCAM1, vascular cell adhesion protein 1.
Clinical relevance of innate memory in inflammatory arthritis
Despite major advances in the clinical diagnosis and therapeutic management of inflammatory arthritis, several clinical aspects and unexpected events remain enigmatic, including the frequency of comorbidities and the variability of treatment response, sustained remission and episodes of disease flare.
The response rate to an effective treatment is extremely variable among patients with RA, and sustained drug-free remission is an unusual event, occurring in <15% of treated patients111. Accumulating evidence indicates that clinical remission involves active immunological processes that dampen the chronic inflammation but that fail to achieve a total recovery of joint homeostasis. Residual subclinical synovitis is likely to persist in patients with RA and PsA in remission112,113. More importantly, gene transcriptional profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of children with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis in remission showed a balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory genes, rather than a return to a normal state114. A study demonstrated that synovial macrophages acquire a pro-inflammatory phenotype under arthritic conditions that persists even after a primary immune stimulus resolves, suggesting that these cells contribute to the maintenance of joint-specific memory in quiescent joints115. A systematic literature review also highlighted the beneficial long-term effects of the ‘window of opportunity’ paradigm, wherein early and aggressive treatment with DMARDs is disproportionally associated with sustained drug-free remission116. Accordingly, in a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, it was concluded that the early initiation of TNF inhibition (with golimumab) accelerates remission of PsA117. Similarly, in patients with RA who have subclinical joint inflammation (detected by MRI), early treatment with methotrexate failed to prevent the establishment of clinical arthritis, but had a sustained positive impact on the disease severity and chronicity of inflammation118. Although the exact disease-specific mechanisms of these DMARDs are inconclusive, several observations suggest they have immunomodulatory effects on innate immune cells. Indeed, circulating monocytes from patients with RA treated with the TNF inhibitor infliximab show a downregulation of the chemokine receptors CCR2 and CXCR4 and an increased expression of the immunoregulatory marker CD163 (ref. 119). Previous data demonstrated that the pre-treatment of macrophages with infliximab in vitro enhances their capacity to produce anti-inflammatory IL-10 following LPS challenge120. These findings, combined with the aforementioned immunoregulatory reprogramming effect of methotrexate and TNF inhibitors on macrophages, suggest that the early initiation of anti-inflammatory treatment could prevent an intense ‘memory’ imprinting of the innate immune response, by modulating the immune cells at a less-activated and more-reversible stage.
Hence, the modulation of innate immune memory is directly relevant to disease severity, treatment response rate and sustained remission. Moreover, it could provide an explanation for disease flare events, which are associated with accelerated joint damage and aggravation of co-morbidities121.
The role of infectious episodes in the onset or the flare of underlying chronic inflammatory disorders has been suggested, and associations between infections and the risk of RA onset are widely described122,123. Conversely, a large population-based case–control study showed that a history of gastrointestinal and urogenital Gram-negative bacterial infections is associated with a decreased risk of RA124. Gram-negative bacterial infection is known to be associated with macrophage tolerance125 and with alleviated symptomatology in other chronic inflammatory conditions126. Other reports link innate immune memory and the high prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in rheumatic diseases127,128.
Collectively, these data support the involvement of innate memory in the modulation of the clinical presentation of inflammatory arthritis (Table 1). Further investigations are required to provide novel biomarkers as promising tools for clinicians to better diagnose and monitor those chronic disorders.
Table 1 |.
Immunological mechanisms linking innate immune memory and clinical features of inflammatory arthritis
| Related disease | Immune trigger | Impact on innate memory | Functional consequences | Mechanism(s) | Clinical effect | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | Methotrexate | Macrophage tolerance | ↓ IL-1β and IL-6 ↓ MAPK, NF-кB and TRIF1 signalling ↑ DNA méthylation |
↑ NF-кB suppressor protein A20 ↓ DNA demethylation enzymes (TET1, TET2,TET3) |
Positive effect on disease severity | 78,85 |
| RA | Pemetrexed | Macrophage tolerance | ↓ TNF and IL-6 production capacity ↓ TLR4 signalling |
↓ Expression of soluble and macrophage membrane-bound CD14 | Increased treatment response rate | 129 |
| RA AS PsA |
TNF blocking agents | Macrophage tolerance | ↓ CCR2 and CXCR4 expression ↓ CD40 and CD80 expression ↑ MerTK and CD163 expression ↑ IL-10 secretion capacity |
↑ Activation of IL-10-STAT3 axis | Improved remission rate and bone-preserving effect | 84,119 |
| RA | Oxidized LDL | Innate immune training | ↑ IL-6, TNF, MCP-1 ↑ Ly6C, CCR5 ↓ SR-B1 |
↑miR-24 ↓ IRAK-M expression ↑ NLRP3 activation ↑ H3K4me3 pro-inflammatory mediators |
Increased atherosclerosis and cardiovascular comorbidities | 127,128 |
| RA | Periodontitis | Innate immune training | ↑ Pro-inflammatory mediators | ↑ IL-1 signalling in HSPCs ↑ Chromatin access to pro-inflammatory genes |
Disease flare and perpetuation of inflammation | 32,122,123 |
AS, ankylosing spondylitis; CCR, C-C chemokine receptor; CXCR, C-X-C chemokine receptor; H3K4me3, trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4; HSPC, haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell; IRAK-M, IL-1 receptor-associated kinase M; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; MerTK, tyrosine protein kinase MER; miR, microRNA; NF-кB, nuclear factor-кB; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SR-B1, scavenger receptor class B type 1; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; TET, ten-eleven translocation; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4; TRIF1, Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β3.
Conclusions
Over the past decade, trained immunity has emerged as one of the most dynamic fields of study in contemporary immunology. The awareness of its immunomodulatory effects on anti-infectious immune responses has grown in parallel with a general recognition of its involvement in the pathogenesis of several immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disorders. In inflammatory arthritis, a complex interaction occurs between the chronic release of pro-inflammatory mediators, the endogenous danger signals from damaged tissues and exogenous factors such as infectious triggers and therapeutic intervention. This interaction confers to the cells of the innate system, as well as to some non-immune cells, a pathogenic memory that perpetuates the inflammation and tissue damage. Nonetheless, beneficial effects of innate immune memory in chronic inflammatory diseases can be achieved with certain stimuli. Remarkably, it is currently challenging to predict the amplitude and longevity of this innate memory, given the multiple variable factors it comprises. Hence, clarifying how the innate immune cells integrate the complex array of surrounding signals in the inflamed joint and process it into long-lasting memory will provide new insights into the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis. Additionally, the identification of the different damage-associated molecular patterns released from damaged synovial tissue and the study of their potential immune-training effect might enable the development of more-effective targeted treatments. Accordingly, the use of large-scale transcriptomic and sequencing techniques along with advanced bioinformatics analysis would help to dissect the signalling pathways and the epigenetic and metabolic modifications that characterize the innate immune and non-immune cells involved in inflammatory arthritis. The goal is to design new personalized molecular tools that specifically target the aberrant accumulation of epigenome-modifying metabolites while preserving the general metabolic machinery responsible for cellular survival and function.
In addition, the expansion of genome-wide experimental and computational techniques could provide important insights into the role of post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modification, a field under-explored so far in innate immune memory. These insights could provide a molecular basis for the development of new therapeutic strategies and would help to facilitate individualized approaches to treating chronic inflammatory disorders.
Key points.
The failure of adaptive immune suppression to achieve sustained remission in inflammatory arthritis highlights the existence of an innate memory phenotype within the immune joint cellular infiltrate.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines can induce innate memory on haematopoietic and progenitor stem cells that exhibit either an increased or an immunosuppressive inflammatory response, resulting in perpetuation or resolution of inflammatory arthritis, respectively.
This acquired memory is demonstrated in osteoclast precursors and potentially terminally differentiated osteoclasts that have the capacity to recycle to osteomorphs and produce stronger secondary responses and increased bone resorption under chronic arthritic conditions.
Innate immune memory serves as an immunomodulatory factor that contributes to various clinical patterns in inflammatory arthritis such as remission, flares and treatment response rate.
Acknowledgements
I.E.A.’s work is supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Grants 2R01AR062173 and R01AR068974.
Footnotes
Competing interests
I.E.A. declares that he has received speaker fees, research support and/or served on advisory boards for Novartis, Pfizer and Merck. M.M.J. declares no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Reviews Rheumatology thanks Y. Abu-Amer and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
References
- 1.Vitetta ES et al. Memory B and T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9, 193–217 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Netea MG, Quintin J & van der Meer JW Trained immunity: a memory for innate host defense. Cell Host Microbe 9, 355–361 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cerwenka A & Lanier LL Natural killer cell memory in infection, inflammation and cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 112–123 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Netea MG et al. Trained immunity: a program of innate immune memory in health and disease. Science 352, aaf1098 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brandi P et al. Trained immunity induction by the inactivated mucosal vaccine MV130 protects against experimental viral respiratory infections. Cell Rep. 38, 110184 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Netea MG et al. Trained immunity: a tool for reducing susceptibility to and the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell 181, 969–977 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kalafati L et al. Innate immune training of granulopoiesis promotes anti-tumor activity. Cell 183, 771–785.e712 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Geller AE et al. The induction of peripheral trained immunity in the pancreas incites anti-tumor activity to control pancreatic cancer progression. Nat. Commun. 13, 759 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bekkering S et al. Metabolic induction of trained immunity through the mevalonate pathway. Cell 172, 135–146.e139 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goldblatt F & O’Neill SG Clinical aspects of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Lancet 382, 797–808 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chaplin DD Overview of the immune response. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, S3–S23 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T & Ono M Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 133, 775–787 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rawlings DJ, Metzler G, Wray-Dutra M & Jackson SW Altered B cell signalling in autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 421–436 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maschmeyer P et al. Immunological memory in rheumatic inflammation — a roadblock to tolerance induction. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 17, 291–305 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gerards AH et al. Cyclosporin A monotherapy versus cyclosporin A and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a double blind randomised placebo controlled trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 62, 291–296 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yocum DE et al. Safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term experience. Rheumatology 43, 992–999 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mangoni AA et al. Relapse rates after elective discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis and review of literature. BMC Rheumatol. 3, 10 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Haschka J et al. Relapse rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in stable remission tapering or stopping antirheumatic therapy: interim results from the prospective randomised controlled RETRO study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 75, 45–51 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moore J et al. A pilot randomized trial comparing CD34-selected versus unmanipulated hemopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe, refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 46, 2301–2309 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jaime-Pérez JC et al. Autologous ATG-free hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a Latin American cohort. Clin. Rheumatol. 41, 869–876 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Teng YK et al. Long-term followup of health status in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Arthritis Rheum. 52, 2272–2276 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mitroulis I et al. Modulation of myelopoiesis progenitors is an integral component of trained immunity. Cell 172, 147–161.e112 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kaufmann E et al. BCG educates hematopoietic stem cells to generate protective innate immunity against tuberculosis. Cell 172, 176–190.e119 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arts RJW et al. BCG vaccination protects against experimental viral infection in humans through the induction of cytokines associated with trained immunity. Cell Host Microbe 23, 89–100.e105 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Christ A et al. Western diet triggers NLRP3-dependent innate immune reprogramming. Cell 172, 162–175 e114 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chavakis T, Mitroulis I & Hajishengallis G Hematopoietic progenitor cells as integrative hubs for adaptation to and fine-tuning of inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 20, 802–811 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Theofilopoulos AN et al. Sensors of the innate immune system: their link to rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6, 146–156 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Murray PJ Macrophage polarization. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 79, 541–566 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Adamopoulos IE et al. IL-17A gene transfer induces bone loss and epidermal hyperplasia associated with psoriatic arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 74, 1284–1292 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Adamopoulos IE et al. IL-23 is critical for induction of arthritis, osteoclast formation, and maintenance of bone mass. J. Immunol. 187, 951–959 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Suzuki E et al. T cell-independent mechanisms associated with neutrophil extracellular trap formation and selective autophagy in IL-17A-mediated epidermal hyperplasia. J. Immunol. 197, 4403–4412 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li X et al. Maladaptive innate immune training of myelopoiesis links inflammatory comorbidities. Cell 185, 1709–1727.e1718 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stark MA et al. Phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils regulates granulopoiesis via IL-23 and IL-17. Immunity 22, 285–294 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mamedov MR et al. A macrophage colony-stimulating-factor-producing γδ T cell subset prevents malarial parasitemic recurrence. Immunity 48, 350–363.e357 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nguyen CT et al. Peripheral γδ T cells regulate neutrophil expansion and recruitment in experimental psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 74, 1524–1534 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Venken K et al. RORγt inhibition selectively targets IL-17 producing iNKT and γδ-T cells enriched in spondyloarthritis patients. Nat. Commun. 10, 9 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Al-Mossawi MH et al. Unique transcriptome signatures and GM-CSF expression in lymphocytes from patients with spondyloarthritis. Nat. Commun. 8, 1510 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Louis C et al. NK cell-derived GM-CSF potentiates inflammatory arthritis and is negatively regulated by CIS. J. Exp. Med. 10.1084/jem.20191421 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oduro KA Jr et al. Myeloid skewing in murine autoimmune arthritis occurs in hematopoietic stem and primitive progenitor cells. Blood 120, 2203–2213 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen TH, Swarnkar G, Mbalaviele G & Abu-Amer Y Myeloid lineage skewing due to exacerbated NF-κB signaling facilitates osteopenia in Scurfy mice. Cell Death Dis. 6, e1723 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Haringman JJ et al. Synovial tissue macrophages: a sensitive biomarker for response to treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 64, 834–838 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Soler Palacios B et al. Macrophages from the synovium of active rheumatoid arthritis exhibit an activin A-dependent pro-inflammatory profile. J. Pathol. 235, 515–526 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Katschke KJ Jr. et al. Differential expression of chemokine receptors on peripheral blood, synovial fluid, and synovial tissue monocytes/macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 44, 1022–1032 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lacerte P et al. Overexpression of TLR2 and TLR9 on monocyte subsets of active rheumatoid arthritis patients contributes to enhance responsiveness to TLR agonists. Arthritis Res. Ther. 18, 10 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van Kuijk AW, Reinders-Blankert P, Smeets TJ, Dijkmans BA & Tak PP Detailed analysis of the cell infiltrate and the expression of mediators of synovial inflammation and joint destruction in the synovium of patients with psoriatic arthritis: implications for treatment. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 65, 1551–1557 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhu H et al. CD16+ monocyte subset was enriched and functionally exacerbated in driving T-cell activation and B-cell response in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front. Immunol. 7, 512 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hepburn AL, Mason JC & Davies KA Expression of Fcγ and complement receptors on peripheral blood monocytes in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 43, 547–554 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Katsiari CG et al. Aberrant expression of the costimulatory molecule CD40 ligand on monocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Immunol. 103, 54–62 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mohammadi S, Memarian A, Sedighi S, Behnampour N & Yazdani Y Immunoregulatory effects of indole-3-carbinol on monocyte-derived macrophages in systemic lupus erythematosus: a crucial role for aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Autoimmunity 51, 199–209 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Steinbach F et al. Monocytes from systemic lupus erythematous patients are severely altered in phenotype and lineage flexibility. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 59, 283–288 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Frostegård J et al. Lipid peroxidation is enhanced in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and is associated with arterial and renal disease manifestations. Arthritis Rheum. 52, 192–200 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.McGarry T et al. Rheumatoid arthritis CD14+ monocytes display metabolic and inflammatory dysfunction, a phenotype that precedes clinical manifestation of disease. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 10, e1237 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gordon RA, Grigoriev G, Lee A, Kalliolias GD & Ivashkiv LB The interferon signature and STAT1 expression in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid macrophages are induced by tumor necrosis factor α and counter-regulated by the synovial fluid microenvironment. Arthritis Rheum. 64, 3119–3128 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hu X & Ivashkiv LB Cross-regulation of signaling pathways by interferon-gamma: implications for immune responses and autoimmune diseases. Immunity 31, 539–550 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Qiao Y et al. Synergistic activation of inflammatory cytokine genes by interferon-γ-induced chromatin remodeling and toll-like receptor signaling. Immunity 39, 454–469 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ivashkiv LB IFNγ: signalling, epigenetics and roles in immunity, metabolism, disease and cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 545–558 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fanucchi S, Dominguez-Andres J, Joosten LAB, Netea MG & Mhlanga MM The intersection of epigenetics and metabolism in trained immunity. Immunity 54, 32–43 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Netea MG et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 375–388 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jha AK et al. Network integration of parallel metabolic and transcriptional data reveals metabolic modules that regulate macrophage polarization. Immunity 42, 419–430 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Arts RJ, Joosten LA & Netea MG Immunometabolic circuits in trained immunity. Semin. Immunol. 28, 425–430 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.McNearney T, Speegle D, Lawand N, Lisse J & Westlund KN Excitatory amino acid profiles of synovial fluid from patients with arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 27, 739–745 (2000). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim S et al. Global metabolite profiling of synovial fluid for the specific diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis from other inflammatory arthritis. PLoS One 9, e97501 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rodgers LC et al. The rheumatoid synovial environment alters fatty acid metabolism in human monocytes and enhances CCL20 secretion. Rheumatology 59, 869–878 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Meyer A et al. Syntenin-1-mediated arthritogenicity is advanced by reprogramming RA metabolic macrophages and Th1 cells. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 10.1136/ard-2022-223284 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cheng SC et al. mTOR- and HIF-1α-mediated aerobic glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity. Science 345, 1250684 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ballestar E & Li T New insights into the epigenetics of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 13, 593–605 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhang Z et al. H3K4 tri-methylation breadth at transcription start sites impacts the transcriptome of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Epigenetics 8, 14 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dai Y, Zhang L, Hu C & Zhang Y Genome-wide analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation by ChIP-chip in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 28, 158–168 (2010). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wu W et al. Cystathionine-γ-lyase ameliorates the histone demethylase JMJD3-mediated autoimmune response in rheumatoid arthritis. Cell Mol. Immunol. 16, 694–705 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mishra N, Reilly CM, Brown DR, Ruiz P & Gilkeson GS Histone deacetylase inhibitors modulate renal disease in the MRL-lpr/lpr mouse. J. Clin. Invest. 111, 539–552 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhao Z et al. Inhibition of histone H3 lysine-27 demethylase activity relieves rheumatoid arthritis symptoms via repression of IL6 transcription in macrophages. Front. Immunol. 13, 818070 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lin YC et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors suppress CCL2 chemokine in monocytes via epigenetic modification. Mol. Immunol. 83, 82–91 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gebert LFR & MacRae IJ Regulation of microRNA function in animals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 21–37 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Seeley JJ et al. Induction of innate immune memory via microRNA targeting of chromatin remodelling factors. Nature 559, 114–119 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kurowska-Stolarska M et al. MicroRNA-155 as a proinflammatory regulator in clinical and experimental arthritis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11193–11198 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yang B et al. Decreased miR-4512 levels in monocytes and macrophages of individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus contribute to innate immune activation and neutrophils NETosis by targeting TLR4 and CXCL2. Front. Immunol. 12, 756825 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rodríguez-Ubreva J et al. Inflammatory cytokines shape a changing DNA methylome in monocytes mirroring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 78, 1505–1516 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.de Andres MC et al. Assessment of global DNA methylation in peripheral blood cell subpopulations of early rheumatoid arthritis before and after methotrexate. Arthritis Res. Ther. 17, 233 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhang F et al. Defining inflammatory cell states in rheumatoid arthritis joint synovial tissues by integrating single-cell transcriptomics and mass cytometry. Nat. Immunol. 20, 928–942 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Alivernini S et al. Distinct synovial tissue macrophage subsets regulate inflammation and remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Med. 26, 1295–1306 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rothlin CV, Ghosh S, Zuniga EI, Oldstone MB & Lemke G TAM receptors are pleiotropic inhibitors of the innate immune response. Cell 131, 1124–1136 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Adomati T et al. Dead cells induce innate anergy via Mertk after acute viral infection. Cell Rep. 30, 3671–3681.e3675 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.de Jong HMY et al. Sustained remission with methotrexate monotherapy after 22-week induction treatment with TNF-α inhibitor and methotrexate in early psoriatic arthritis: an open-label extension of a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Res. Ther. 21, 208 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Degboé Y et al. Polarization of rheumatoid macrophages by TNF targeting through an IL-10/STAT3 mechanism. Front. Immunol. 10, 3 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Municio C et al. Methotrexate limits inflammation through an A20-dependent cross-tolerance mechanism. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 77, 752–759 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Xia M et al. Histone methyltransferase Ash1l suppresses interleukin-6 production and inflammatory autoimmune diseases by inducing the ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20. Immunity 39, 470–481 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tsukasaki M & Takayanagi H Osteoimmunology: evolving concepts in bone-immune interactions in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 626–642 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Teitelbaum SL & Ross FP Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 638–649 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Fierro FA, Nolta JA & Adamopoulos IE Concise review: stem cells in osteoimmunology. Stem Cell 35, 1461–1467 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Adamopoulos IE et al. Synovial fluid macrophages are capable of osteoclast formation and resorption. J. Pathol. 208, 35–43 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Adamopoulos IE & Mellins ED Alternative pathways of osteoclastogenesis in inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11, 189–194 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Adamopoulos IE et al. Interleukin-17A upregulates receptor activator of NF-κB on osteoclast precursors. Arthritis Res. Ther. 12, R29 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Shin HS et al. Crosstalk among IL-23 and DNAX activating protein of 12 kDa-dependent pathways promotes osteoclastogenesis. J. Immunol. 194, 316–324 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yarilina A, Xu K, Chen J & Ivashkiv LB TNF activates calcium-nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)c1 signaling pathways in human macrophages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1573–1578 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Furuya H et al. Interleukin-23 regulates inflammatory osteoclastogenesis via activation of CLEC5A+ osteoclast precursors. Arthritis Rheumatol. 10.1002/art.42478 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Andreev D et al. Osteocyte necrosis triggers osteoclast-mediated bone loss through macrophage-inducible C-type lectin. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 4811–4830 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Nishikawa K et al. DNA methyltransferase 3a regulates osteoclast differentiation by coupling to an S-adenosylmethionine-producing metabolic pathway. Nat. Med. 21, 281–287 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Indo Y et al. Metabolic regulation of osteoclast differentiation and function. J. Bone Miner. Res. 28, 2392–2399 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Murata K et al. Hypoxia-sensitive COMMD1 integrates signaling and cellular metabolism in human macrophages and suppresses osteoclastogenesis. Immunity 47, 66–79.e65 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kim K, Shin Y, Kim J, Ulmer TS & An W H3K27me1 is essential for MMP-9-dependent H3N-terminal tail proteolysis during osteoclastogenesis. Epigenetics Chromatin 11, 23 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Xia Y et al. TGFβ reprograms TNF stimulation of macrophages towards a non-canonical pathway driving inflammatory osteoclastogenesis. Nat. Commun. 13, 3920 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kurotaki D, Yoshida H & Tamura T Epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of osteoclast differentiation. Bone 138, 115471 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kameda Y et al. Siglec-15 regulates osteoclast differentiation by modulating RANKL-induced phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and Erk pathways in association with signaling Adaptor DAP12. J. Bone Miner. Res. 28, 2463–2475 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Moorlag S et al. An integrative genomics approach identifies KDM4 as a modulator of trained immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 52, 431–446 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.McDonald MM et al. Osteoclasts recycle via osteomorphs during RANKL-stimulated bone resorption. Cell 184, 1940 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tsourdi E et al. Discontinuation of denosumab therapy for osteoporosis: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. Bone 105, 11–17 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Kiesel JR, Buchwald ZS & Aurora R Cross-presentation by osteoclasts induces FoxP3 in CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 182, 5477–5487 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Li H et al. Cross talk between the bone and immune systems: osteoclasts function as antigen-presenting cells and activate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Blood 116, 210–217 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Ibáñez L et al. Inflammatory osteoclasts prime TNFα-producing CD4+ T cells and express CX3 CR1. J. Bone Miner. Res. 31, 1899–1908 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Madel MB et al. Dissecting the phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of mouse inflammatory osteoclasts by the expression of Cx3cr1. Elife 10.7554/eLife.54493 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Prevoo ML et al. Remission in a prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. American Rheumatism Association preliminary remission criteria in relation to the disease activity score. Br. J. Rheumatol. 35, 1101–1105 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Alivernini S et al. Synovial features of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis in clinical and ultrasound remission differ under anti-TNF therapy: a clue to interpret different chances of relapse after clinical remission? Ann. Rheum. Dis. 76, 1228–1236 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Tokai N et al. Predictive value of bone destruction and duration of clinical remission for subclinical synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Mod. Rheumatol. 25, 540–545 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Knowlton N et al. The meaning of clinical remission in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: gene expression profiling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells identifies distinct disease states. Arthritis Rheum. 60, 892–900 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Misharin AV et al. Nonclassical Ly6C− monocytes drive the development of inflammatory arthritis in mice. Cell Rep. 9, 591–604 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.van Nies JA et al. What is the evidence for the presence of a therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic literature review. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 73, 861–870 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.van Mens LJJ et al. Achieving remission in psoriatic arthritis by early initiation of TNF inhibition: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of golimumab plus methotrexate versus placebo plus methotrexate. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 78, 610–616 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Krijbolder DI et al. Intervention with methotrexate in patients with arthralgia at risk of rheumatoid arthritis to reduce the development of persistent arthritis and its disease burden (TREAT EARLIER): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 400, 283–294 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Aeberli D et al. Regulation of peripheral classical and non-classical monocytes on infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. RMD Open 2, e000079 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Vos AC et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies induce regulatory macrophages in an Fc region-dependent manner. Gastroenterology 140, 221–230 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Saleem B et al. Can flare be predicted in DMARD treated RA patients in remission, and is it important? A cohort study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 71, 1316–1321 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Chen HH et al. Association between a history of periodontitis and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide, population-based, case-control study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 1206–1211 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Mikuls TR et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis and disease-related autoantibodies in individuals at increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 64, 3522–3530 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Sandberg ME, Bengtsson C, Klareskog L, Alfredsson L & Saevarsdottir S Recent infections are associated with decreased risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based case-control study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 74, 904–907 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Biswas SK & Lopez-Collazo E Endotoxin tolerance: new mechanisms, molecules and clinical significance. Trends Immunol. 30, 475–487 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Jeljeli M et al. Macrophage immune memory controls endometriosis in mice and humans. Cell Rep. 33, 108325 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Bekkering S et al. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein induces long-term proinflammatory cytokine production and foam cell formation via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 34, 1731–1738 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Geng S et al. The persistence of low-grade inflammatory monocytes contributes to aggravated atherosclerosis. Nat. Commun. 7, 13436 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Fuentelsaz-Romero S et al. The macrophage reprogramming ability of antifolates reveals soluble CD14 as a potential biomarker for methotrexate response in rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Immunol. 12, 776879 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Vaugelade J, Pinchinat S, Guiella G, Elguero E & Simondon F Non-specific effects of vaccination on child survival: prospective cohort study in Burkina Faso. Br. Med. J. 329, 1309 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Kleinnijenhuis J et al. Bacille Calmette-Guerin induces NOD2-dependent nonspecific protection from reinfection via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17537–17542 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Quintin J et al. Candida albicans infection affords protection against reinfection via functional reprogramming of monocytes. Cell Host Microbe 12, 223–232 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Jeljeli M et al. Trained immunity modulates inflammation-induced fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 10, 5670 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Saz-Leal P et al. Targeting SHIP-1 in myeloid cells enhances trained immunity and boosts response to infection. Cell Rep. 25, 1118–1126 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Foster SL, Hargreaves DC & Medzhitov R Gene-specific control of inflammation by TLR-induced chromatin modifications. Nature 447, 972–978 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Cunningham KT, Finlay CM & Mills KHG Helminth imprinting of hematopoietic stem cells sustains anti-inflammatory trained innate immunity that attenuates autoimmune disease. J. Immunol. 206, 1618–1630 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Martinez-Gonzalez I et al. Allergen-experienced group 2 innate lymphoid cells acquire memory-like properties and enhance allergic lung inflammation. Immunity 45, 198–208 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Ardain A et al. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells mediate early protective immunity against tuberculosis. Nature 570, 528–532 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Naik S et al. Inflammatory memory sensitizes skin epithelial stem cells to tissue damage. Nature 550, 475–480 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Hamada A, Torre C, Drancourt M & Ghigo E Trained immunity carried by non-immune cells. Front. Microbiol. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03225 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Arts RJ et al. Glutaminolysis and fumarate accumulation integrate immunometabolic and epigenetic programs in trained immunity. Cell Metab. 24, 807–819 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Jentho E et al. Trained innate immunity, long-lasting epigenetic modulation, and skewed myelopoiesis by heme. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10.1073/pnas.2102698118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Ospelt C et al. Overexpression of toll-like receptors 3 and 4 in synovial tissue from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: toll-like receptor expression in early and longstanding arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 58, 3684–3692 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Mizoguchi F et al. Functionally distinct disease-associated fibroblast subsets in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Commun. 9, 789 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Nygaard G & Firestein GS Restoring synovial homeostasis in rheumatoid arthritis by targeting fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16, 316–333 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Chang SK et al. Cadherin-11 regulates fibroblast inflammation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8402–8407 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Noss EH, Chang SK, Watts GF & Brenner MB Modulation of matrix metalloproteinase production by rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts after cadherin 11 engagement. Arthritis Rheum. 63, 3768–3778 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Lee DM et al. Cadherin-11 in synovial lining formation and pathology in arthritis. Science 315, 1006–1010 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Lee A et al. Tumor necrosis factor α induces sustained signaling and a prolonged and unremitting inflammatory response in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 65, 928–938 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Sohn C et al. Prolonged tumor necrosis factor α primes fibroblast-like synoviocytes in a gene-specific manner by altering chromatin. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67, 86–95 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Ospelt C, Gay S & Klein K Epigenetics in the pathogenesis of RA. Semin. Immunopathol. 39, 409–419 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Ai R et al. Comprehensive epigenetic landscape of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Nat. Commun. 9, 1921 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Yan M et al. ETS1 governs pathological tissue-remodeling programs in disease-associated fibroblasts. Nat. Immunol. 23, 1330–1341 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Friščić J et al. The complement system drives local inflammatory tissue priming by metabolic reprogramming of synovial fibroblasts. Immunity 54, 1002–1021.e1010 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Koedderitzsch K, Zezina E, Li L, Herrmann M & Biesemann N TNF induces glycolytic shift in fibroblast like synoviocytes via GLUT1 and HIF1A. Sci. Rep. 11, 19385 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Friščić J et al. Reset of inflammatory priming of joint tissue and reduction of the severity of arthritis flares by bromodomain inhibition. Arthritis Rheumatol. 10.1002/art.42378 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
