Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Feb 8;14:3257. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53424-2

Collagenase-based wound debridement agent induces extracellular matrix supporting phenotype in macrophages

Pradipta Banerjee 1,2, Amitava Das 2, Kanhaiya Singh 1,2, Savita Khanna 1,2, Chandan K Sen 1,2, Sashwati Roy 1,2,
PMCID: PMC10853180  PMID: 38331988

Abstract

Macrophages assume diverse phenotypes and functions in response to cues from the microenvironment. Earlier we reported an anti-inflammatory effect of Collagenase Santyl® Ointment (CSO) and the active constituent of CSO (CS-API) on wound macrophages in resolving wound inflammation indicating roles beyond debridement in wound healing. Building upon our prior finding, this study aimed to understand the phenotypes and subsets of macrophages following treatment with CS-API. scRNA-sequencing was performed on human blood monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) following treatment with CS-API for 24 h. Unbiased data analysis resulted in the identification of discrete macrophage subsets based on their gene expression profiles. Following CS-API treatment, clusters 3 and 4 displayed enrichment of macrophages with high expression of genes supporting extracellular matrix (ECM) function. IPA analysis identified the TGFβ-1 pathway as a key hub for the CS-API-mediated ECM-supportive phenotype of macrophages. Earlier we reported the physiological conversion of wound-site macrophages to fibroblasts in granulation tissue and impairment of such response in diabetic wounds, leading to compromised ECM and tensile strength. The findings that CSO can augment the physiological conversion of macrophages to fibroblast-like cells carry significant clinical implications. This existing clinical intervention, already employed for wound care, can be readily repurposed to improve the ECM response in chronic wounds.

Subject terms: Cell biology, Immunology, Molecular biology, Physiology

Introduction

Wound healing is a complex process that involves the coordinated interplay of various cellular and molecular events. The wounds that fail to progress through the normal stages of healing within an expected timeframe (typically > 30 days per CMS1) are known as chronic wounds. The economic impact of the care of chronic wounds encompasses various factors, including direct and indirect medical costs, and the overall societal burden. Per Medicare, the projected cost for management of chronic wounds in 2014 ranged from $28.1 to $96.8 billion in the US alone2. Adequate wound bed preparation is a crucial step in wound care that focuses on creating an optimal environment for the healing of chronic wounds3. One critical component of wound bed preparation is the removal of dead and necrotic tissues, the process also known as debridement3,4. Santyl® or CSO (Collagenase Santyl® Ointment) is an FDA-approved clostridial collagenase-based prescription ointment for effective enzymatic debridement of chronic wounds5. Expression of collagenases, a class of metalloproteinases, is required for wound healing, however, long-term, and the continued presence of these metalloproteinases at the wound site may adversely affect the healing process6,7. Elevated and prolonged expression of proteases produced during the inflammatory phase of healing can lead to excessive ECM degradation associated with impaired healing6. Chronic wounds exhibit heightened levels of MMPs alongside diminished tissue inhibitors of MMP (TIMP). This imbalance likely contributes to the hindered healing processes in these wounds. The MMP-1/TIMP-1 ratio has been proposed as a predictive marker for wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers8. We and others have proposed roles of CSO at the wound site that are beyond its role in debridement912.

Persistent non-resolving inflammation is a characteristic of chronic wounds13,14. Macrophages are critical cells that shape the inflammatory response at the wound-site15,16. Genetic approaches for selective depletion of macrophages demonstrated defective inflammatory, epithelialization, and granulation tissue responses17,18. Major functions of macrophages in the process of wound healing involve host-defense activities, mounting and resolution of the inflammatory response, removal of dead cells and debris, and supporting key wound healing processes including epithelialization, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling19. A central role of macrophages in orchestrating ECM production and homeostasis during the injury repair process has been recognized17,20. The evidence supports that dynamic interaction between macrophages, and ECM components enhances the overall quality of tissue repair leading to an improved wound tensile strength18,21. Development of the significance of macrophages in ECM regulation rests on an appreciation that the production of appropriate ECM represents a major cornerstone of the healing process22.

Plasticity and heterogeneity are major characteristics of cells of myeloid lineages. Macrophages assume diverse phenotypes and functions in response to cues from microenvironment23. Recent scRNA-seq analysis studies have allowed for the identification of distinct macrophage subsets based on their gene expression profiles23. In our previous study, we first highlighted an anti-inflammatory effect of CSO specifically the active constituent of CSO, henceforth called CS-API on wound macrophages in resolving wound inflammation via STAT6 and NF-κB pathways12. Building upon our prior findings on unique responses of CSO on macrophage phenotype and function, the aim of this study was to utilize scRNA-seq technology to further understand the phenotypes, and subsets of macrophages following treatment with CSO. These studies unraveled unique functional pathways associated with CSO-induced macrophage subsets with significance in ECM regulation and wound healing.

Results

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) experiment investigating the effects of CS-API treatment on hMDM was performed to determine changes in the macrophage subset population in response to the treatment (Fig. 1). The schema of the experiment is presented (Fig. 1a). A total of 18,545 cells that passed the quality control parameters were subjected to downstream analyses (see “Methods”, Fig. 1d). Unsupervised clustering of single cells from the combined samples resulted in identification of 8 distinct clusters within hMDMs (Fig. 1b-c). Further analysis identified three transcriptionally distinct subpopulations (clusters 2, 3 and 4) that were either enriched (clusters 3 & 4) or diminished (cluster 2) in response to CS-API treatment (Fig. 1b) suggesting a unique macrophage subpopulation-specific response of CS-API. The total number of cells in the overall population of MDM subjected to scRNA analysis in CS-API or vehicle-treated were comparable. These findings provided insights into the transcriptional heterogeneity and differential gene expression patterns in hMDMs following treatment with CS-API, highlighting the potential impact of CS-API on macrophage phenotypes and cellular responses.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA seq) data analysis identifies 3 discrete MDM sub populations that are responsive to CS-API treatment. Human blood monocyte derived macrophages (hMDM) were treated with CS-API (250 ng/ml, 24 h). The cells were harvested and processed for scRNA seq analysis. Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the treatment of human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) and the workflow for obtaining and analyzing scRNA-seq data from hMDMs. (b) T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plots representing the results of scRNA-seq analysis on hMDM cells treated with CS-API or vehicle for 24 h. A total of eight major clusters (clusters 1–8) were identified and are depicted with distinct colors. The initial dataset consisted of 18,545 cells that passed the quality control criteria for further downstream analysis. (c) Bar graph displaying the percentage of total cells in each cluster. Clusters 2, 3, and 4 were found to be differentially expressed in the CS-API treated group. (d) Violin plot depicting the fraction of mitochondrial counts per cell in hMDMs treated with CS-API or vehicle control after filtration. Each data point represents a single cell, while the violin plot summarizes the distribution of the data.

The scRNA-seq analysis allowed for the identification of discrete macrophage subsets (clusters 2–4) based on their gene expression profiles. Notably, macrophages in clusters 3 and 4 displayed enrichment of macrophages expressing elevated levels of gene expression associated with ECM following CS-API treatment (Fig. 2). Several collagen-related genes, including COL1A1, COL3A1, and COL6A1, showed increased expression levels in the macrophages treated with CS-API compared to their control (TESCA) counterparts (Fig. 2a). In addition to increased collagen expression, the identified macrophage subtypes (clusters 3 and 4) also exhibited enhanced expression of vimentin (VIM) and ACTA2 (Fig. 2b). These markers are associated with a more fibroblast-like phenotype. We and others have reported transition of macrophages to fibroblast-like cell22,24,25.Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was performed to assess the functional significance of the identified macrophage subtypes (Fig. 2c). The analysis revealed the significance of these clusters in collagen production, ECM remodeling, and wound healing pathways. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) displayed ECM-related terms were highly significant and among top ten enriched terms (Fig. 2d, e).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Identification of collagen producing macrophage subtypes following CS-API treatment. (a) t-SNE plots depicting the results of scRNA-seq analysis on human monocyte-derived macrophage (hMDM) cells treated with CS-API or vehicle for 24 h. The analysis revealed the presence of distinct macrophage subtypes, specifically clusters 3 and 4, which showed high expression levels of collagen types 1A1, 3A1, and 6A1. The cells expressing these transcripts are shown by blue colors in the corresponding plots. (b) In addition to increased collagen expression, the identified macrophage subtypes (clusters 3 and 4) also exhibited enhanced expression of vimentin (VIM) and ACTA2. (c) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was performed to assess the functional significance of the identified macrophage subtypes. The analysis revealed the significance of these clusters in extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and wound healing. (d, e) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), (d) the bar plot shows the enrichment scores of the significant (p < 0.0001) top 10 enrichment pathways; (e) bubble plot showing rich factor, p values and number of genes in the list.

To verify the findings from scRNA analysis, RT2 profiler studies were performed using ECM-focused arrays (Fig. 3a). Using the RT2 Profiler data, a volcano plot analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed transcripts following CS-API treatment (Fig. 3b). The volcano plot revealed significant changes in gene expression, with COL1A1 emerging as one of the most abundantly upregulated transcripts. Col1A1 showed a significant increase in expression levels, indicating its potential role in the response to CS-API treatment and validating the findings from the scRNA seq analysis. Independent RT-PCR analysis was performed to assess the expression levels of COL1A1 mRNA in samples treated with CS-API compared to vehicle control. The RT-PCR results confirmed a robust and significant upregulation of COL1A1 mRNA expression following CS-API treatment, consistent with the findings from scRNA seq and RT2 profiler analysis (Fig. 3a-c).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Volcano plot analysis of RT2 Profiler & RTPCR data reveals upregulation of collagen subtypes following CS-API treatment. (a) Schematic diagram of the validation of scRNA seq observation of Col1A1 expressing macrophage subtype using RT2 profiler and real time PCR analysis. (b) The volcano plot displays the differential gene expression analysis results of RT2 Profiler data, comparing CS-API-treated samples to control samples. Each data point represents a transcript, with the x-axis representing the log2 fold change and the y-axis representing the statistical significance (negative log10 p-value) of differential expression. The yellow data points indicate transcripts with a significant upregulation following CS-API treatment. Among the differentially expressed transcripts, COL1A1 stands out as one of the most abundantly upregulated transcripts. (c) Independent RT-PCR analysis was performed to validate the upregulation of COL1A1 mRNA following CS-API treatment. Expression levels of Col1A1 were measured using specific primers, and the results confirmed a significant increase in mRNA expression compared to control (TESCA buffer, vehicle) samples. Data presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 compared to vehicle (control) treated MDM.

In addition to mRNA expression analysis, immunocytochemistry was employed to evaluate the protein expression of Col1A1 (Fig. 4a-c). The immunocytochemistry analysis involved the detection of Col1A1 protein using specific antibodies (Col1A1, green and CD68, red, marker for mature macrophages) in CS-API-treated and control (TESCA buffer, vehicle)-treated samples. The results demonstrated a marked increase in Col1A1 protein expression in cells treated with CS-API, confirming the upregulation observed at the transcript level. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) indicated the presence of significantly higher Col1A1 protein expression, post-CS-API treatment (Fig. 4d).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Independent immunohistochemistry validation of Col1A1 protein expression. (a-c) The immunocytochemistry (IHC) analysis involved the detection of Col1A1 protein using specific antibodies (Col1A1, green and CD68, red, marker for mature macrophages) using fluorescence microscopy. (a, b) microscopy images of MDM cells treated with either (a), control buffer (vehicle, TESCA); or (b), CS-API; (c) The bar graph presents the quantification of the IHC images. Scale bar = 10 mm. au = arbitrary units. (d) Col1A1 protein expression was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data are mean ± SEM from 3–5 independent IHC images in each group. *p < 0.05.

Collectively, the volcano plot analysis of RT2 Profiler data identified COL1A1 as one of the most abundant transcripts upregulated following CS-API treatment. The independent validation through RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry analyses further confirmed the increased expression of COL1A1 at both the mRNA and protein levels. These findings suggest a potential role for Col1A1 in the cellular response to CS-API treatment and highlight its significance in the context of CS-API-induced effects in wounds that are beyond its role in debridement.

To determine the overall functional significance of the scRNA-seq data on macrophage responses to CS-API, IPA analysis was performed on scRNA-seq data from human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) following treatment with CS-API (Fig. 5). The analysis aimed at identifying the predicted pathways implicated in wound healing that were upregulated in hMDMs following CS-API treatment, the key predicted pathways upregulated included TGFβ-1, VEGF, and CSF2 pathways implicated in immune response, angiogenesis and ECM generation and homeostasis (Fig. 5a) providing insights into their functional implications in the wound healing response. Upstream analysis of collagen subtype response indicated the TGFβ-1 pathway as a key hub (Fig. 5b-c), revealing underlying molecular mechanisms of robust collagen response following CS-API treatment.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

IPA Analysis of Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) Data. The IPA analysis was performed on scRNA-seq data from human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) following treatment with CS-API. (a) Analysis of wound healing related pathways identified upregulation of TGFβ-1, VEGF and CSF2 implicated in ECM generation, angiogenesis and proliferation and differentiation of myeloid cells, respectively. (b) Network analysis for upstream regulators of multiple collagen types upregulated in response to CS-API revealed TGFβ-1 and miR200b as hubs. (c) Prediction legend for the pathways presented in panels (a) and (b).

Discussion

Wound healing is a complex process that involves the coordinated interplay of various cellular and molecular events2,14,26. Chronic wounds often exhibit compromised tensile strength, which can contribute to poor healing outcomes, increased risk of wound dehiscence, and overall impaired wound function. Several factors can contribute to compromised tensile strength in chronic wounds including prolonged inflammation, excessive production of MMPs, persistent infection, use of medications such as corticosteroids, and underlying conditions such as poor perfusion27. Adequate ECM dynamics and gain of tensile strength are essential for successful wound healing28. Pro-ECM interventions to improve the strength of chronic wounds are highly desirable. This study provided initial evidence that CSO, a clinically approved wound debridement agent has the potential to improve wound ECM response by converting macrophages to a pro-ECM fibroblast-like response. CSO is unique and one of the very few FDA-approved enzymatic debridement agents with biological activity for clinical application29.

Macrophage response is necessary for achieving normal repair processes17,18. Nonspecific inhibition of macrophages is detrimental to early matrix formation and wound strength30. While the classically activated M1 subtype and the alternatively activated M2 macrophages is a commonly used classification31, with the advent of scRNA seq studies it is recognized that this classification is an oversimplification of the macrophage subtypes involved in tissue repair and regeneration process23,32. As the wound progresses through the healing cascade, macrophages adopt distinct phenotypes to support healing including regulation of inflammatory response, angiogenesis, tissue regeneration, and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition22,23. Initially, at the site of injury, macrophages exhibit a pro-inflammatory phenotype, secreting cytokines and chemokines that recruit endothelial cells fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts. Subsequently, macrophages transition to an anti-inflammatory phenotype, characterized by the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)23. This study supports our previous research on the ability of CSO to transform macrophages into an anti-inflammatory phenotype23.

Macrophages display remarkable plasticity by converting into various cell types, such as endothelial cells, white adipocytes, and osteoclasts22. In an earlier study we provided definitive evidence, through lineage tracing and mechanistic studies, that at an early phase, the wound-site macrophages are the primary source of wound fibroblasts in the granulation tissue22. This concept has been independently verified by Guerrero-Juarez, et al., as they identified one subset of fibroblasts expressing hematopoietic markers, suggesting their myeloid origin33. Recently a fibrogenic macrophage subset was identified that is induced by type 3 inflammation34. These macrophage-converted fibroblasts not only contribute to advancing the wound healing process beyond the inflammatory phase but also play a role in tissue remodeling after wound closure22. The findings from the above studies shed light on the significance of physiologically macrophage-converted fibroblast-like cells and their role in tissue repair, offering new perspectives on the acute inflammatory phase and the fate of macrophages at the injury site22. In the current study, the pro-ECM fibroblast-like phenotype observed via scRNA seq study indicates that CSO, through CS-API can augment the physiologic conversion of macrophages to fibroblast-like cells which may not only facilitate resolution of inflammation but also promote better granulation tissue formation. This finding has high translational significance in chronic wounds where conversion of wound macrophages into fibroblasts was noted to be impaired in diabetic individuals, leading to prolonged retention of macrophages in their pro-inflammatory state22. This finding from the current study along with our earlier report of promotion of an anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotype by CSO in diabetic wounds12 indicates a specific effect of CSO in modulating wound macrophage response to facilitate inflammation resolution, wound ECM deposition, and organization.

Type I collagen is a major component of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and is crucial for tissue structure and integrity35,36. While COL1A1 expression is traditionally associated with fibroblasts and other mesenchymal cells, emerging evidence suggests that macrophages can also express COL1A1 under certain conditions22,37. Macrophages with COL1A1 expression can directly contribute to the accumulation of type I collagen in the ECM, thereby influencing tissue remodeling processes22,35. Growth factors transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) is known to regulate COL1A1 expression via the cooperation of Sp1 and Smad proteins38,39. Ablation of macrophages in the wound using genetic approaches has been shown to consequently result in decreased expression of TGFβ, reduced proliferation of fibroblasts, and less ECM deposition18. IPA analysis in the current study predicted involvement of the TGFβ-1 pathway in the activation of the collagen subtype expression. The presence of macrophages expressing COL1A1 following CS-API treatment highlights their potential role in ECM remodeling and granulation tissue maturation processes. The precise mechanisms governing COL1A1 expression in macrophages are still under investigation. Further research is needed to fully understand the functional implications of COL1A1 expression in macrophages, as well as its contribution to wound ECM and granulation tissue responses. This study does not address if these macrophages become collagen-producing myofibroblasts, retain their macrophage characteristics, or whether there is conversion from proinflammatory to anti-inflammatory phenotype. Moreover, in-depth in vivo studies are warranted to confirm whether these findings hold true in an actual wound environment. To date, there is a dearth of literature documenting the effects of CS-API or CSO on other cell types pertinent to the process of wound healing.

In addition to collagen subtypes, the study revealed enrichment of vimentin (VIM) and Actin alpha 2, smooth muscle (ACTA2), also known as alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), expressing macrophages following CS-API treatment. Vimentin is an intermediate filament protein that primarily serves as a structural component of the cytoskeleton and plays important roles in wound healing40. Vimentin has been implicated in facilitating macrophage migration and host defenses during wound healing and tissue repair processes40,41. ACTA2 protein is primarily associated with smooth muscle cells. ACTA2 plays a crucial role in wound healing, contributing to structural and contractile functions of myofibroblasts42. ACTA2 and vimentin expressions have been reported in macrophages41,43. Various studies, including our own, have documented a pivotal role of vimentin and ACTA2 in transitioning macrophages into fibroblasts and myofibroblasts like cells such as seen in macrophage–myofibroblast transition (MMT)4448. MMT was supported in vivo in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients via single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA seq) where approximately 50% of ACTA2+ cells also exhibited positivity for the macrophage marker CD68 suggesting presence MMT in vivo49. These findings provide additional support for a crucial role of ACTA2 in modifying the macrophages to fibroblast-like cells.

Clostridial collagenase has been shown to aid in the continued removal of immediate and accumulating necrotic tissue without affecting healthy tissue5,50. A unique feature of this collagenase is that it can cleave repeating Gly-X–Y collagen sequences at distinct Y-Gly bond harboring sites thus releasing collagen peptides51. Macrophages are known to internalize collagen by mannose receptors52. A study investigating underlying mechanisms of CS-API mediated cellular effects provided evidence that collagen-associated and other ECM-derived peptides are primarily responsible for its downstream angiogenic responses11. We have reported macrophage conversion to a pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory phenotype by collagen peptides53. This evidence along with the report that collagen peptides can induce TGFb1-smad pathway suggests that ECM peptides associated with CS-API treatment of wounds may be responsible for its pro-ECM effects on macrophages54. In our model involving isolated macrophages treated with collagenase in culture, it is acknowledged that extracellular collagen secreted from macrophages will be the only substrate for the enzyme for production of collagen peptides. Additional mechanisms of collagenase action on isolated macrophages on inducing the pro-ECM phenotype cannot be disregarded. Previous research from our group highlighted the activation of the PGE2-EP4 pathway after treating isolated macrophages with collagenase in culture (CSO)12. This pathway is recognized for its role in activating collagen gene expression55.

This study provides initial evidence that clinically approved wound debridement agent CSO has the potential to improve the wound ECM response by converting macrophages to an ECM supporting fibroblast-like phenotype. Our earlier report established the significance of the physiological conversion of wound-site macrophages to fibroblasts in granulation tissue, contributing to tissue remodeling and this response is compromised in chronic diabetic wounds22. The findings that CSO can augment the physiological conversion of macrophages to fibroblast-like cells hold immense significance. This clinical intervention, already utilized for wound care, can be readily repurposed to improve the extracellular matrix (ECM) response in chronic wounds. The studies have reported that CSO in combination with sharp debridement as opposed to sharp debridement alone provided better healing outcomes and suggest a role of CSO beyond debridement29,56. Further research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms and functional implications of macrophage conversion and ECM remodeling in the context of CSO treatment. Such knowledge can pave the way for the development of targeted strategies to enhance wound healing outcomes and improve the quality of life for individuals with chronic wounds.

Materials and methods

Peripheral Blood Monocyte Derived Macrophages (MDMs) and CS-API treatment

Human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) were harvested from fresh blood leukocyte source packs (Versity, Indianapolis, Indiana) by density gradient centrifugation using a Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient (GE Healthcare, formerly Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) as previously described57. Positive selection for monocytes was performed using CD14 antibody conjugated to magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Purity of these preparations of monocytes was > 90% as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses using CD14 antibodies. The experiments were performed using MDM from multiple donors (n = 4–5). Differentiation of these cells to macrophages (MDMs) was performed as described57. The MDMs were seeded in 12-well plates at a density of 1.5 × 106 and treated with the active ingredient of CSO, CS-API (250 ng/ml). The CS-API was dissolved in TESCA buffer (pH 7.4) and provided to cells as reported by us12. The control cells were treated with TESCA buffer (TES: N-Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic Acid); TES + CaCl2 (TESCA) buffer alone for periods specified in figure legends. The media and cells were collected for downstream molecular analysis.

Single-cell RNA-sequencing

Single-cell suspensions were generated from MDM cells following 24 h of CS-API treatment. The viability of the cells was determined to be > 98% by performing cell counting and viability assays using propidium iodide (PI) staining and flowcytometry. PI is a membrane impermeant dye that is generally excluded from viable cells. The resulting cell suspension was utilized for scRNA-Seq using the 10 × Genomics platform using Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3′ GEM, Library & Gel Bead kit v3.1and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 as reported by us5860.

For data analysis the raw sequencing data by demultiplexing and trimming adapter sequences using the 10 × Genomics Cell Ranger software. The preprocessed data to a reference genome using read aligners such as STAR. The data was further processed using the Partek Flow® software including quality control steps to remove low-quality cells based on the following criteria total reads, number of genes detected, and mitochondrial gene content. The data was normalized using counts per million (CPM). The principal component analysis (PCA) and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) techniques were utilized to visualize and explore the cell population structure. The cell clusters were identified using graph-based approaches. Differentially expressed genes between clusters were determined using a D-Seq module with statistical tests. To determine the biological processes and pathways associated with specific cell clusters of MDMs, Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA, Qiagen) was performed58,59.

RT2 profiler PCR

Gene expression profiling on ECM-specific pathways was done using a 96-well human RT2 Profiler PCR Array (Qiagen, Catalog 330,231 PAHS-013ZA, MD, USA). The array comprised of 96 wells. Each well contained all the reagents required for the PCR reaction in addition to a primer for a single gene. MDM cells were treated with CS-API (250 ng/ml) or control (TESCA buffer). cDNA was transcribed using an RT2 First Strand Synthesis Kit (QIAGEN). The resulting cDNA was diluted and loaded into the predesigned RT2 Profiler PCR Array plates. mRNA expression levels were quantified employing the 2(−ΔΔct) relative quantification method.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and quantitative RT-PCR

mirVana RNA isolation kit (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions to extract total RNA as previously described22. Quantification of mRNA was done by real-time or quantitative (Q)PCR assay using double-stranded DNA binding dye SYBR Green-I and primers specific for the Col1A1 gene as described previously12,61,62. 18S or β-ACTIN were used as reference housekeeping genes.

Immunocytochemistry (ICC)

Cytospun MDM cell suspensions on glass slides were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Following fixation, cells were washed with PBS, blocked in 10% normal goat serum (NGS) for 30 min, and were incubated in primary antibodies Col1A1 (1:200; NBP1-77458F; FITC tagged; Novus), CD68 (1:200; ab213363, Abcam). Fluorescence-tagged secondary antibody detection was performed with Alexa Fluor 568 secondary antibody (1:200, Life Technologies) as described previously12. The cells were counter stained by DAPI (nuclear stain, blue). Fluorescent images were collected using axioscan imager (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Image analysis was performed using Zen (Zeiss) software.

ELISA

Levels of Col1A1 secreted by hMDMs in the presence or absence of CS-API were measured using commercially available human collagen type I, alpha 1 ELISA kit (MyBioSource, catalog# MBS703198, San Diego, CA) as per manufacturer’s instructions12,53,62,63.

Data collection and statistical analyses

Data are reported as mean ± SEM of 4–8 experiments as indicated in respective figure legends. Student's t-test was used to determine significant differences between the means. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

Technical help from Dr. Sedat Kacar, Ms. Sreemala Murthy, Grace Lander, and Simpla Mahato is acknowledged for RT2 profiler and IHC experiments. This work was supported by a research award from Smith & Nephew and in part by R01DK135447, R01DK125835, to CKS, R01DK128845 to CKS & SR and R01DK114718 to SR.

Author contributions

S.R., C.K.S., S.K. conceived and designed the work. P.B., A.D., K.S. collected, analyzed data for this work and participated in the preparation of the manuscript. S.R., P.B., A.D. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author SR. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the GEO repository. The following secure token has been created to allow review of record GSE243622 while it remains in private status.

Competing interests

The collagenase based wound debridement agent and unrestricted research development funding was provided to Indiana University School of Medicine by Smith and Nephew.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Electrostimulation for Wounds. CAG-00068N. https://www.cms.gov/ (2002).
  • 2.Sen CK. Human wounds and its burden: An updated compendium of estimates. Adv. Wound Care. 2019;8:39–48. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.0946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Panuncialman J, Falanga V. The science of wound bed preparation. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2009;89:611–626. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wei C, Granick MS. Surgical management of chronic wounds T. Wounds. 2008;20:62–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shi L, Carson D. Collagenase Santyl ointment: A selective agent for wound debridement. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36:S12–16. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181bfdd1a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCarty SM, Percival SL. Proteases and delayed wound healing. Adv. Wound Care. 2013;2:438–447. doi: 10.1089/wound.2012.0370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McCarty SM, Cochrane CA, Clegg PD, Percival SL. The role of endogenous and exogenous enzymes in chronic wounds: A focus on the implications of aberrant levels of both host and bacterial proteases in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20:125–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00763.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Muller M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and diabetic foot ulcers: The ratio of MMP-1 to TIMP-1 is a predictor of wound healing. Diabet. Med. 2008;25:419–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02414.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mosher BA, Cuddigan J, Thomas DR, Boudreau DM. Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology. Adv. Wound Care. 1999;12:81–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rao DB, Sane PG, Georgiev EL. Collagenase in the treatment of dermal and decubitus ulcers. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1975;23:22–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sheets AR, et al. Identification and characterization of novel matrix-derived bioactive peptides: A role for collagenase from santyl(R) ointment in post-debridement wound healing? PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0159598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Das A, et al. Novel mechanisms of Collagenase Santyl Ointment (CSO) in wound macrophage polarization and resolution of wound inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1696. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19879-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Williams MD, Nadler JL. Inflammatory mechanisms of diabetic complications. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2007;7:242–248. doi: 10.1007/s11892-007-0038-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM. Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007;127:514–525. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leibovich SJ, Ross R. The role of the macrophage in wound repair. A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum. Am. J. Pathol. 1975;78:71–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leibovich SJ, Wiseman DM. Macrophages, wound repair and angiogenesis. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1988;266:131–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lucas T, et al. Differential roles of macrophages in diverse phases of skin repair. J. Immunol. 2010;184:3964–3977. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mirza R, DiPietro LA, Koh TJ. Selective and specific macrophage ablation is detrimental to wound healing in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;175:2454–2462. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brancato SK, Albina JE. Wound macrophages as key regulators of repair: origin, phenotype, and function. Am. J. Pathol. 2011;178:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44:450–462. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Koh TJ, Novak ML, Mirza RE. Assessing macrophage phenotype during tissue repair. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;1037:507–518. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-505-7_30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sinha M, et al. Direct conversion of injury-site myeloid cells to fibroblast-like cells of granulation tissue. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:936. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03208-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Das A, et al. Monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regeneration. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:2596–2606. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abu El-Asrar AM, et al. Macrophage-myofibroblast transition contributes to myofibroblast formation in proliferative vitreoretinal disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 doi: 10.3390/ijms241713510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Haider N, et al. Transition of macrophages to fibroblast-like cells in healing myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;74:3124–3135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sen CK, et al. Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:763–771. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Roy S, et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection compromises wound healing by causing deficiencies in granulation tissue collagen. Ann. Surg. 2020;271:1174–1185. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hunt TK, Hopf H, Hussain Z. Physiology of wound healing. Adv. Skin Wound Care. 2000;13:6–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tallis A, et al. Clinical and economic assessment of diabetic foot ulcer debridement with collagenase: Results of a randomized controlled study. Clin. Ther. 2013;35:1805–1820. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chamberlain CS, et al. The influence of macrophage depletion on ligament healing. Connect Tissue Res. 2011;52:203–211. doi: 10.3109/03008207.2010.511355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: In vivo veritas. J. Clin. Investig. 2012;122:787–795. doi: 10.1172/JCI59643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huang J, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals functionally distinct biomaterial degradation-related macrophage populations. Biomaterials. 2021;277:121116. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guerrero-Juarez CF, et al. Single-cell analysis reveals fibroblast heterogeneity and myeloid-derived adipocyte progenitors in murine skin wounds. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:650. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08247-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fabre T, et al. Identification of a broadly fibrogenic macrophage subset induced by type 3 inflammation. Sci. Immunol. 2023;8:eadd8945. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.add8945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mathew-Steiner SS, Roy S, Sen CK. Collagen in wound healing. Bioengineering. 2021 doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8050063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gould LJ. Topical collagen-based biomaterials for chronic wounds: Rationale and clinical application. Adv. Wound Care. 2016;5:19–31. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsitoura E, et al. Collagen 1a1 expression by airway macrophages increases in fibrotic ILDs and is associated with FVC decline and increased mortality. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:645548. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.645548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li MO, Wan YY, Sanjabi S, Robertson AK, Flavell RA. Transforming growth factor-beta regulation of immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006;24:99–146. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sysa P, Potter JJ, Liu X, Mezey E. Transforming growth factor-beta1 up-regulation of human alpha(1)(I) collagen is mediated by Sp1 and Smad2 transacting factors. DNA Cell Biol. 2009;28:425–434. doi: 10.1089/dna.2009.0884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eckes B, et al. Impaired mechanical stability, migration and contractile capacity in vimentin-deficient fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 13):1897–1907. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.13.1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mor-Vaknin N, Punturieri A, Sitwala K, Markovitz DM. Vimentin is secreted by activated macrophages. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003;5:59–63. doi: 10.1038/ncb898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fakatava N, et al. Actin alpha 2, smooth muscle, a transforming growth factor-beta1-induced factor, regulates collagen production in human periodontal ligament cells via Smad2/3 pathway. J. Dent. Sci. 2023;18:567–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.08.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Iwata H, et al. Bone marrow-derived cells contribute to vascular inflammation but do not differentiate into smooth muscle cell lineages. Circulation. 2010;122:2048–2057. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.965202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang S, et al. TGF-β/Smad3 signalling regulates the transition of bone marrow-derived macrophages into myofibroblasts during tissue fibrosis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:8809–8822. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tang PM, et al. The proto-oncogene tyrosine protein kinase Src is essential for macrophage-myofibroblast transition during renal scarring. Kidney Int. 2018;93:173–187. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yang Y, et al. Fate alteration of bone marrow-derived macrophages ameliorates kidney fibrosis in murine model of unilateral ureteral obstruction. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2019;34:1657–1668. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vierhout M, et al. Monocyte and macrophage derived myofibroblasts: Is it fate? A review of the current evidence. Wound Repair Regen. 2021;29:548–562. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Wang S, Lan HY. Macrophages promote renal fibrosis through direct and indirect mechanisms. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2014;2011(4):34–38. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2014.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ask K, Vierhout M, Dvorkin-Gheva A, Shi W. Mononuclear phagocytic system and fibrosis: back to the future? Eur. Respir J. 2021 doi: 10.1183/13993003.04466-2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Frederick RE, et al. Clostridium collagenase impact on zone of stasis stabilization and transition to healthy tissue in burns. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 doi: 10.3390/ijms22168643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang YZ, Ran LY, Li CY, Chen XL. Diversity, structures, and collagen-degrading mechanisms of bacterial collagenolytic proteases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:6098–6107. doi: 10.1128/aem.00883-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Madsen DH, et al. The non-phagocytic route of collagen uptake: A distinct degradation pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:26996–27010. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.208033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Das A, et al. A modified collagen dressing induces transition of inflammatory to reparative phenotype of wound macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:14293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49435-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu Z, et al. Collagen peptides promote photoaging skin cell repair by activating the TGF-beta/Smad pathway and depressing collagen degradation. Food Funct. 2019;10:6121–6134. doi: 10.1039/c9fo00610a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Inazumi T, et al. Prostaglandin E(2)-EP4 axis promotes lipolysis and fibrosis in adipose tissue leading to ectopic fat deposition and insulin resistance. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108265. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Motley TA, Lange DL, Dickerson JE, Jr, Slade HB. Clinical outcomes associated with serial sharp debridement of diabetic foot ulcers with and without clostridial collagenase ointment. Wounds. 2014;26:57–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ganesh K, et al. Prostaglandin E2 induces oncostatin M expression in human chronic wound macrophages through Axl receptor tyrosine kinase pathway. J. Immunol. 2012;189:2563–2573. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rustagi Y, et al. Endothelial phospholipase Cgamma2 improves outcomes of diabetic ischemic limb rescue following VEGF therapy. Diabetes. 2022;71:1149–1165. doi: 10.2337/db21-0830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Singh K, et al. Genome-wide DNA hypermethylation opposes healing in patients with chronic wounds by impairing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Clin. Investig. 2022 doi: 10.1172/JCI157279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gordillo GM, et al. Tissue nanotransfection causes tumor regression by its effect on nanovesicle cargo that alters microenvironmental macrophage state. Mol. Ther. 2023;31:1402–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Das A, Ganesh K, Khanna S, Sen CK, Roy S. Engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages: a role of microRNA-21 in the resolution of wound inflammation. J. Immunol. 2014;192:1120–1129. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ganesh K, et al. Prostaglandin E(2) induces oncostatin M expression in human chronic wound macrophages through Axl receptor tyrosine kinase pathway. J. Immunol. 2012;189:2563–2573. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Das A, et al. Correction of MFG-E8 resolves inflammation and promotes cutaneous wound healing in diabetes. J. Immunol. 2016;196:5089–5100. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author SR. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the GEO repository. The following secure token has been created to allow review of record GSE243622 while it remains in private status.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES