Summary
Background
Although mpox has been detected in paediatric populations in central and west Africa for decades, evidence synthesis on paediatric, maternal, and congenital mpox, and the use of vaccines and therapeutics in these groups, is lacking. A systematic review is therefore indicated to set the research agenda.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching articles in Embase, Global Health, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and WHO databases from inception to April 17, 2023. We included studies reporting primary data on at least one case of confirmed, suspected, or probable paediatric, maternal, or congenital mpox in humans or the use of third-generation smallpox or mpox vaccines, targeted antivirals, or immune therapies in at least one case in our population of interest. We included clinical trials and observational studies in humans and excluded reviews, commentaries, and grey literature. A pooled estimate of the paediatric case fatality ratio was obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420223336648).
Findings
Of the 61 studies, 53 reported paediatric outcomes (n=2123 cases), seven reported maternal or congenital outcomes (n=32 cases), two reported vaccine safety (n=28 recipients), and three reported transmission during breastfeeding (n=4 cases). While a subset of seven observational studies (21 children and 12 pregnant individuals) reported uneventful treatment with tecovirimat, there were no randomised trials reporting safety or efficacy for any therapeutic agent. Among children, the commonest clinical features included rash (86 [100%] of 86), fever (63 [73%] of 86), and lymphadenopathy (40 [47%] of 86). Among pregnant individuals, rash was reported in 23 (100%) of 23; fever and lymphadenopathy were less common (six [26%] and three [13%] of 23, respectively). Most paediatric complications (12 [60%] of 20) arose from secondary bacterial infections. The pooled paediatric case fatality ratio was 11% (95% CI 4–20), I2=75%. Data from 12 pregnancies showed half resulted in fetal death. Research on vaccine and immune globulin safety remains scarce for children and absent for pregnant individuals.
Interpretation
Our review highlights critical knowledge gaps in the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of mpox in children and pregnant individuals, especially those residing in endemic countries. Increased funding, international collaboration, and equitable research is needed to inform mpox control strategies tailored for at-risk communities in endemic countries.
Funding
None.
Translations
For the French, Spanish and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Introduction
Mpox (previously monkeypox) is a zoonotic orthopox viral disease that has historically affected infants, children, and adolescents from lower-income and rural communities in west and central Africa. The true burden and geographical range of endemic mpox remains poorly defined due to diagnostic challenges and surveillance limitations.1 However, the incidence is typically highest in children, with available recent data from DR Congo indicating an estimated incidence of 18·1 per 100 000 among 5–9-year-olds.2
The primary reservoir in west and central Africa is thought to be small mammals (eg, rope squirrels, giant-pouched rats, and African dormice), although live monkeypox virus (MPXV) has only been isolated from sylvatic animals twice.3, 4 Primates can also become infected, and the hunting, handling, and consumption of bushmeat has been implicated in mpox cases.5, 6, 7 Human-to-human transmission occurs via direct contact with lesion exudates, bodily fluids, or respiratory droplets, and indirect contact with contaminated surfaces.1 Mpox can also be vertically transmitted8, 9, 10 and has the potential to be transmitted via breastfeeding.11, 12, 13
In 2022, a multi-country mpox outbreak occurred,14, 15, 16, 17 primarily due to viral clade IIb (which is less virulent than clade I), resulting in 91 123 cases across 115 countries and 157 deaths, as of October, 2023, and triggering WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.18, 19 Despite the recognition of human cases since 1970 and the high number of cases in this outbreak, research on paediatric and pregnant populations remains scarce.20 Children are at particular risk of severe sequelae, including keratitis leading to blindness,9 severe keloid scarring, pneumonitis, and encephalitis.21, 22, 23
Research in context.
Evidence before this study
Mpox, caused by the monkeypox virus, has been documented to affect rural communities in central and west Africa since the 1970s. The incidence is highest among infants, children, and adolescents in these regions and pregnant women are at risk of severe complications including fetal loss. Before the multi-country outbreak in 2022, mpox was an extremely neglected disease, but despite the increasing interest, research on the sequelae, treatment, and prevention of mpox in children and pregnant women remains limited. Before this study, we did a rapid review on PubMed on June 1, 2022, for studies on paediatric and maternal mpox, using the search terms monkeypox or mpox, pregnan*, maternal, wom#n, child*, congenital*, vertical*, transmi*, neonat*, p?ediatric, infect*, smallpox, vaccin* or immuni#ation, prevent*, safe*, tecovirimat, treat*, and breastfeeding. A systematic review on the epidemiology of mpox reported an increase in the incidence of mpox in all age groups in DR Congo and an increase in the median age of published cases. A systematic review on maternal mpox based on four pregnant individuals (data to June, 2022) reported an incidence of late fetal and perinatal loss of 77·0% (95% CI 26·0−100). There were no systematic reviews reporting on paediatric mpox.
Added value of this study
This is the first systematic review to collate clinical and therapeutic evidence on paediatric and maternal mpox in both endemic and non-endemic countries. Our systematic review includes clinical data from 16 countries on 2123 paediatric cases and 32 maternal cases. It provides evidence of third-generation smallpox vaccination safety in 28 paediatric cases, uneventful tecovirimat use in 21 paediatric and 12 maternal cases, vaccinia immune globulin intravenous use in four paediatric cases, and cidofovir use in one paediatric case. It provides evidence of poor outcomes (fetal death) in half (six of 12) of the cases who were infected during pregnancy (occurring in all three trimesters). It provides a pooled estimate of the case fatality ratio of mpox in children of 11% (95% CI 4–20). The scope of the results is limited by the availability and quality of the datasets that have been published.
Implications of all the available evidence
Mpox can lead to devastating sequelae for children and pregnant women in endemic regions in Africa. There are currently no completed randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of treatments in pregnant and paediatric populations, there is scant access to appropriate diagnostic methods, and little if any availability of the third-generation vaccine in endemic regions in Africa. Funding and priority should be given to the surveillance of mpox and the collection of disaggregated longitudinal data in endemic regions. This should be supported by the rapid scaling up of free testing with government policy backing to maximise the capture of cases. Adult, paediatric, and pregnant populations in endemic countries must also be included in clinical trials assessing the efficacy of novel treatments and vaccines. This includes appropriate vaccine allocation and distribution prioritising the most at-risk groups. Increased funding, international collaboration, and equitable research is ultimately needed to contain this neglected disease beginning with those most at risk in endemic countries.
The risks associated with mpox can be reduced through vaccine administration and therapeutics. A live, attenuated, non-replicating third-generation smallpox vaccine (MVA-BN available as JYNNEOS or IMVANEX) was licensed against smallpox by the European Medicines Agency in 2013 and extended in 2020 to include mpox and related orthopoxviruses (OPXV). It is currently unlicensed in children younger than 18 years,24, 25 although emergency use authorisation is available for children in some high-income and middle-income regions, including the EU, UK, and USA.26 Its use in pregnancy has not been published but has demonstrated safety in animal models.27 Another third-generation vaccine, LC16-KMB, is licensed in children as part of a clinical trial in Japan.28 The first-generation Dryvax and second-generation ACAM2000 vaccines had a vaccine effectiveness of 72% and 75% respectively,29 but these and other older smallpox vaccines were considered unsafe in pregnancy and contraindicated in immunosuppressed individuals and infants.30, 31, 32, 33, 34 Specific antiviral mpox treatments (eg, tecovirimat, brincidofovir) and immune therapies (eg, vaccinia immune globulin intravenous [VIGIV]) were used during the 2022 outbreak, but their use in children and pregnant women has been more limited.16, 26, 35, 36
To collate and appraise the available evidence, we did a systematic review on paediatric, maternal, and congenital mpox, vertical transmission, and the use of vaccines and therapeutics in pregnant and paediatric populations.
Methods
Search strategy and selection criteria
We conducted a systematic literature review in line with PRISMA guidelines,37 registering the study on PROSPERO (CRD420223336648). We employed a PICOS framework to structure the research (appendix 4 p 1).
We searched Embase, Global Health, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and WHO databases for primary research reporting on paediatric, maternal, and congenital mpox and the use of smallpox or mpox vaccines and treatments in our populations of interest, with no language, country, or date restrictions. A Boolean strategy was developed (appendix 4 pp 7–12). The initial search was carried out on June 17, 2022, and repeated on April 17, 2023. Ethical approval was not required.
We included studies reporting primary data on at least one case of confirmed, suspected, or probable paediatric, maternal, or congenital mpox in humans or the use of third-generation smallpox or mpox vaccines, targeted antivirals, or immune therapies in at least one case in our population of interest. We excluded review papers, commentaries, non-systematic reviews, and grey literature. Patients were considered paediatric if they were aged 18 years or younger. Adapted WHO 2022 mpox case definitions were used (appendix 4 pp 2–3).38 Cases of varicella zoster virus co-infection were excluded. For studies reporting on multiple populations or outcomes of interest, data were tabulated separately. Where multiple studies reported on the same cases or outbreaks, the most complete description was included.
Data analysis
Records were imported into EndNote version 21, and duplicates deleted. One reviewer (NSC) carried out title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction, and quality assessment, with all steps duplicated by an independent second reviewer (CC, PT, EVT, PA, or ESP). Discrepancies were resolved with a third researcher (PT or CC). We used a snowballing method to identify relevant articles through citations.
Data were extracted on study type, location, year, number of cases, and age and sex of the child or gestational age in weeks, plus symptoms, complications, and outcome of infection (recovered or died), diagnostic method (viral isolation, PCR, serology, or clinical diagnosis), and treatment.
Paediatric primary outcomes were complications secondary to mpox, requirement for hospitalisation or intensive care, and death. Maternal primary outcomes were preterm labour, pregnancy loss, requirement for hospitalisation or intensive care, and maternal death. Congenital primary outcomes were occurrence of mother-to-child mpox transmission, prematurity, small-for-gestational age, low birthweight, microcephaly, and congenital anomalies. Secondary outcomes were the safety and efficacy of smallpox or mpox vaccines and targeted antivirals or immune therapies in the prevention and treatment of mpox in pregnancy or childhood.
To estimate the pooled paediatric case fatality ratio (CFR; appendix 4 p 3), we conducted a meta-analysis using the random-effects model available from Stata version 18.0 metaprop function.39 This enabled the calculation of 95% CIs using the statistical score and the exact binomial method and incorporates the Freeman-Tukey arcsine double proportions transformation. This method also models intrastudy variability using the binomial distribution. Interstudy heterogeneity was described using the I2 statistic, which describes the percentage of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance. Where observational studies contained data from overlapping locations and time periods, studies with the greatest number of individuals were included and others were excluded. 95% CIs for proportions were also calculated using Stata version 18.0.39
Quality assessment of all studies was carried out in duplicate (NSC and CC, PT, EVT, PA, or ESP) using the Murad criteria, which categorise studies as good, fair, or poor.40
Role of the funding source
There was no funding source for this study.
Results
Our database search identified 1544 records, with an additional ten identified via citation searching. Of these, 61 were included in the final analysis (figure 1), reporting on: paediatric outcomes (n=53), maternal or congenital outcomes (n=7), transmission through breastfeeding (n=3), and vaccination in pregnancy or paediatric populations (n=2), with four studies reporting on two domains. The studies reported cases from 16 countries (figure 2): DR Congo (n=16),2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 23, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 USA (n=8),11, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 Central African Republic (n=6),1, 12, 59, 60, 61, 62 Nigeria (n=6),21, 63, 64, 65 Spain (n=4),66, 67, 68 UK (n=4),16, 69, 70, 71 Republic of the Congo (n=3),72, 73, 74 Cameroon (n=2),75, 76 Côte d'Ivoire (n=2),77, 78 France (n=2),79, 80 Brazil (n=1),81 Gabon (n=1),82 Liberia (n=1),83 the Netherlands (n=1),84 Sierra Leone (n=1),85 and Sudan (pre-2011 split; n=1).86 One study reported Europe-wide data,87 and another reported data from west and central Africa.88 Publication dates spanned 51 years (1972–2023). Study designs included 18 case reports, 16 outbreak reports, ten observational studies, nine surveillance studies, seven case series, and one serological survey. Literature ranged in quality, with 30 studies rated as good, 28 as fair, and three as poor.40 Study characteristics are summarised in table 1, table 2, and appendix 4 (p 7), and quality assessments in appendix 4 (pp 4–5).
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram of included data sources
Figure 2.
Map showing locations of included studies
Table 1.
Details of all included paediatric studies
| Clinical features | Complications | Outcome | Laboratory diagnosis | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-aggregate data | ||||||
| Ditta et al (2023)52; case report; USA; n=1 | ||||||
| 8-year-old female | Right eye: pain, photophobia, blurry vision, discharge, multiple umbilicated lesions along eyelids, mild conjunctival injection | Corneal subepithelial and stromal infiltrates, preseptal cellulitis | Recovered; normal vision | PCR-positive (×2) | IV aciclovir (stopped); IV clindamycin; oral tecovirimat 400 mg 12-hourly for 14 days; trifluridine drops (keratitis) | |
| Antonello et al (2023)81; case report; Brazil; n=1 | ||||||
| 9-day-old, sex NR | Generalised vesicular rash | Respiratory distress syndrome needing ventilation at day 11 of life | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion) | IV vancomycin | |
| Del Giudice et al (2023)79; case series; France; n=2 | ||||||
| 4-year-old female | Fever (38° C), rash (pustules, papules on erythematous base, disseminated erythematous maculae), bilateral conjunctivitis | Nil | Recovered | PCR-positive | Nil | |
| 7-year-old female | Micropapular pustules on erythematous base (10 pustules) | Nil | Recovered | PCR-positive | Nil | |
| Vallée et al (2023)80; case report; France; n=1 | ||||||
| 18-year-old female | Fever; rash on hands, wrists, gluteal region; ulceronecrotic lesions (vaginal and vulval); myalgia; headaches | Nil | Recovered | PCR-positive (throat swab) | Nil | |
| Roguera Sopena et al (2022)66; case report; Spain; n=1 | ||||||
| 3-year-old female | Rash (polymorphous with umbilicated pustular, vesicular, papular elements) | Nil | Recovered | PCR-positive | NR | |
| Fuente et al (2022)67; case report; Spain; n=1 | ||||||
| 13-month-old male | Fever; rash (purulent blistering lesion on finger and crusty lesions on scalp and toe); vomiting; diarrhoea | Nil | Recovered | PCR-positive | NR | |
| Tutu van Furth et al (2022)84; case report; Netherlands; n=1 | ||||||
| 10-year-old male | Rash (20 solitary, sharply demarcated, red-brown vesicles); sore throat | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (clade IIb) | Nil | |
| Ramnarayan et al (2022)69; case report; UK; n=1 | ||||||
| 9-day-old, sex NR | Rash (initially vesicular then pustular); axillary lymphadenopathy | Hypoxaemic respiratory failure requiring ventilation; adenovirus co-infection | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion fluid, blood, urine, respiratory secretions; clade IIb) | Enteral tecovirimat (2 weeks, 50 mg twice daily) and IV cidofovir | |
| Saunders et al (2022)53; case report; USA; n=1 | ||||||
| <2-month-old, sex NR | Raised erythematous rash on the arms, legs, and trunk | Cellulitis | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion; clade II) | Oral tecovirimat and VIGIV | |
| Adler et al (2022)16; case report; UK; n=1 | ||||||
| <2-year-old female | No prodrome; lymphadenopathy; 30 concurrent lesions on face, trunk, arms, legs | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (blood, nose and throat swab) | Nil* | |
| Hobson et al (2021)70; case series; UK; n=1 | ||||||
| 18-month-old, sex NR | Rash | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion; clade II) | Nil | |
| Ogoina et al (2020)21; retrospective observational study; Nigeria; n=1 | ||||||
| 28-day-old female | NR | Bronchopneumonia, lung opacification, encephalitis with seizures | Died | NR (diagnosis was reported as suspected, probable, or confirmed in an aggregate manner) | NR | |
| Eltvedt et al (2020)41; case series; DR Congo; n=2 | ||||||
| 4-year-old male | Fever; rhinitis; conjunctivitis; cough; lymphadenitis; non-pruritic vesiculopapular rash (all skin surfaces including palms, soles, mucous membranes) | NR | Died | Nil (suspected case) | IV antibiotics, retinol, IV fluids, nutrition | |
| 10-year-old male | NR | NR | Recovered | Nil (suspected case) | NR | |
| Yinka-Ogunleye et al (2019)64; surveillance study; Nigeria; n=1 | ||||||
| 1-month-old, sex NR | Vesiculopapular rash | NR | Died | PCR-positive, IgM-positive (clade II) | NR | |
| Sadeuh-Mba et al (2019)75; outbreak report; Cameroon; n=1 | ||||||
| 3-week-old female | Fever; generally unwell; painful maculopapular rash | NR | Recovered | PCR-negative (suspected) | NR | |
| Reynolds et al (2019)85; outbreak report; Sierra Leone; n=1 | ||||||
| 11-month-old male | Fever; pustular umbilicated pruritic rash (all skin surfaces including palms, soles, mucous membranes); vomiting; loss of appetite; cough | Nil | Recovered | PCR-positive (serum, lesion); orthopoxvirus IgG and IgM-positive (clade II) | Nil | |
| Ogoina et al (2019)63; outbreak report; Nigeria; n=1 | ||||||
| 11-year-old male | Fever; progressive vesicopustular rash on skin, oral, and nasal mucosa; generalised lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| Doshi et al (2019)72; outbreak report; Republic of the Congo; n=14 | ||||||
| 9-year-old male | Fever, rash | NR | NR | PCR-positive (lesion) | NR | |
| 4-year-old female | NR | NR | Died | PCR-positive (lesion) | NR | |
| 12-year-old female | NR | NR | Recovered | Orthopoxvirus PCR-positive | NR | |
| 8-year-old male | Rash | NR | NR | IgM, IgG-positive | NR | |
| 14-year-old female | Fever, rash | NR | Died | Nil (suspected) | NR | |
| 11-year-old female | Fever, rash | NR | Recovered | Orthopoxvirus PCR-positive | NR | |
| 3-year-old male | Fever, rash | Nil | Recovered | IgM, IgG-positive | NR | |
| 1-year-old female | NR | Nil | Recovered | IgG-positive | NR | |
| 1-year-old male | NR | NR | Recovered | IgM, IgG-positive | NR | |
| 5-year-old female | NR | NR | Recovered | IgM, IgG-positive | NR | |
| 5-year-old female | NR | NR | Recovered | IgM, IgG-positive | NR | |
| 3-year-old female | NR | NR | Recovered | IgM, IgG-positive | NR | |
| 11-year-old male | NR | NR | Recovered | IgM, IgG-positive | NR | |
| 15-year-old female | NR | NR | Recovered | IgG-positive | NR | |
| Besombes et al (2019)59; outbreak report; Central African Republic; n=4 | ||||||
| 5-month-old female | Fever, maculopapular rash on soles and feet | NR | NR | PCR-positive | NR | |
| 4-year-old female | Fever, maculopapular rash on soles and feet | NR | NR | PCR-positive | NR | |
| 7-year-old female | Fever, rash | NR | NR | PCR-positive | NR | |
| 16-year-old female | Fever, rash | NR | NR | PCR-positive | NR | |
| Kalthan et al (2018)60; outbreak report; Central African Republic; n=1 | ||||||
| 1-year-old, sex NR | Fever, rash | NR | Died | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| Nakoune et al (2017)12; outbreak report; Central African Republic; n=3 | ||||||
| 9-year-old male | Fever (which persisted for >7 days), rash, headaches | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (blood) | Oral antibiotics | |
| 5-year-old male | Fever, rash, cervical lymphadenitis, severe facial oedema, bilateral conjunctivitis | Pulmonary oedema, profound hypothermia | Died | PCR-positive (blood; clade I) | IV antibiotics, tetracycline eye ointment, furosemide, oxygen, promethazine | |
| 15-month-old, sex NR | Rash, reduced feeding, lethargy | NR | Died | PCR-positive (blood) | Promethazine | |
| Reynolds et al (2013)73; outbreak report; Republic of the Congo; n=6 | ||||||
| 2-year-old male | Fever, rash following monkey bite | NR | NR | PCR-negative | NR | |
| 7-year-old female | NR | NR | NR | PCR-positive | NR | |
| 16-year-old female | Fever, rash, lymphadenopathy | NR | NR | PCR-positive | NR | |
| 10-year-old male | Fever, rash, lymphadenopathy | NR | NR | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| 9-year-old female | Fever, rash, lymphadenopathy | NR | NR | NA (suspected) | NR | |
| 12-year-old male | Fever, rash, lymphadenopathy | NR | NR | NA (suspected) | NR | |
| Formenty et al (2010)86; outbreak report; Sudan; n=1 | ||||||
| 8-month-old male | Fever, rash, cough, lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (blood and lesion; clade I) | NR | |
| Learned et al (2005)74; case series; Republic of the Congo; n=11 | ||||||
| 16-year-old female | Rash | NR | Recovered | PCR-negative (suspected) | Flucloxacillin | |
| 5-month-old female | Fever, rash, parotitis, dysphagia, lymphadenopathy | Became meningitic on day 8 | Recovered | PCR-positive | Isoprinosine, Maxilase, ibuprofen, amoxicillin and gentamicin, ceftriaxone | |
| 5-year-old male | Fever, rash, parotitis, dysphagia, lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | PCR-negative | Isoprinosine, Maxilase, ibuprofen, betamethasone, co-amoxiclav, gentamicin | |
| 10-year-old male | Fever, rash, parotitis, dysphagia, lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | PCR-negative | Indomethacin, betamethasone, benzylpenicillin, gentamicin | |
| 10-year-old female | Fever, rash, dysphagia, lymphadenopathy, conjunctivitis | Developed renal tract sepsis, had surgical exploration | Died | PCR-positive | Surgery | |
| 8-year-old female | Fever, rash, dysphagia, lymphadenopathy, conjunctivitis | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive | Maxilase, indomethacin, phenoxymethylpenicillin, gentamicin | |
| 4-year-old male | Fever, itchy rash, parotitis, dysphagia, lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive | Isoprinosine, quinine, amoxicillin, gentamicin, benzylpenicillin, rovamycin | |
| 17-year-old male | Fever, rash, arthralgia, myalgia; patient recently had malaria | NR | Recovered | PCR-negative | Isoprinosine, chloroquine, amoxicillin | |
| 11-year-old male | NR | NR | Recovered | Nil (probable†) | NR | |
| 11-year-old male | NR | NR | Recovered | Orthopoxvirus IgG-positive | NR | |
| 3-year-old male | Rash | Nil | Recovered | Orthopoxvirus IgM and IgG-positive | NR | |
| Sejvar et al (2004)54; observational study; USA; n=1 | ||||||
| 6-year-old female | Fever, rash, sore throat, malaise, anorexia, headache, enlarged tonsils, cervical lymphadenopathy | New-onset seizures 6 days after onset of initial illness preceded by somnolence (encephalitis) | NR | PCR-positive (blood), IgM-positive (CSF) | IV antibiotics, lorazepam, phenobarbital | |
| Anderson et al (2003)55; case report; USA; n=1 | ||||||
| “School age” female | Fever, rash, chills, night sweats, fatigue; swollen, painful cervical lymph nodes | Dysphagia, vomiting, difficulty in breathing, inability to eat and drink, retropharyngeal abscess | NR | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| Meyer et al (2002)7; outbreak report; DR Congo; n=11 | ||||||
| 1·5-year-old male | Rash on palms, soles, mouth, face, and trunk | NR | NR | PCR-positive (lesion; clade I) | NR | |
| 12-year-old male | Rash on palms, soles, face, and trunk (severe) | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (clade I) | NR | |
| 3-year-old male | Rash on palms, soles, face, and trunk (severe) | NR | Recovered | PCR-negative | NR | |
| 2-year-old, sex NR | Rash on palms and soles (severe), trunk, and face (mild) | NR | Recovered | PCR-negative | NR | |
| 11-year-old male | Rash on palms and soles (severe), trunk, and face (mild) | NR | Died | PCR-positive (clade I) | NR | |
| 14-year-old male | Rash on palms, sole, face, and trunk; cervical and inguinal lymphadenopathy | NR | NR | PCR-positive (lesion) | NR | |
| 9-year-old female | Fever; rash on palms, soles, face, and trunk; cervical lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion) | NR | |
| 8-year-old male | Fever; rash on palms, soles, face, and trunk; cervical lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion) | NR | |
| 4·5-year-old female | Fever, generalised rash, shivers, cervical lymphadenopathy | NR | Died | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| 3·5-year-old female | Fever, generalised rash, shivers, cervical lymphadenopathy | NR | Died | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| 3·5-year-old male | Generalised rash, conjunctivitis, pharyngitis | Pulmonary failure | Died | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| Tchokoteu et al (1991)76; case report; Cameroon; n=1 | ||||||
| 7-year-old male | Fever, rash (face, limbs, scalp, palms, soles, genitalia), abdominal pain, cervical lymphadenopathy, vomiting, headache, facial swelling, stomatitis, dysphagia, anorexia, weakness | Tachypnoea | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion) | Oral antibiotics, antipyretics, and dietary supplements | |
| Meyer et al (1991)82; case report; Gabon; n=5 | ||||||
| 9-month-old female | Fever, skin lesions, mild diarrhoea and vomiting, lymphadenopathy, facial oedema, painful pharyngitis, sleepy, hepatomegaly | Haemorrhagic fever (buccal mucosal bleeding), possibly due to liver failure and coagulopathy | Died | Viral isolation (blood) | Parenteral nutrition, steroids, furosemide | |
| 4-year-old male | Fever, skin lesions, sleepy, clinically unwell, facial oedema, no meningitic signs, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, pharyngitis; had concurrent malaria | Haemorrhagic fever (haematemesis, buccal mucosal bleeding), possibly due to liver failure and coagulopathy | Died | NR (suspected) | Antibiotics, quinine | |
| 9-year-old female | Fever (up to 40°C), sleepy, clinically unwell, facial and neck oedema, skin lesions, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, pharyngitis | NR | Recovered | NR (suspected) | Penicillin, aspirin | |
| 6-year-old female | Fever, skin lesions which scar, lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | NR (suspected) | Nil | |
| 6-year-old male | NR | NR | NR | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| Herve et al (1989)61; outbreak report; Central African Republic; n=2 | ||||||
| 6-year-old female | Rash on trunk, limbs, palms, soles | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion) | NR | |
| 8-year-old male | Rash on trunk, limbs, palms, soles; severe, large cervical lymphadenopathy; significant weight loss | NR | Recovered | PCR-positive (lesion) | NR | |
| Jezek et al (1986)42; case series; Zaire; n=5 | ||||||
| 5-year-old male | Fever, rash (generalised—up to 320 lesions), submandibular lymphadenitis, tonsillitis | Nil | Recovered | Radioimmunoabsorption assay tests positive with convalescent sera | NR | |
| 7-year-old male | Fever, rash (170 lesions, centrifugal, affecting palms and soles) | NR | Recovered | Radioimmunoabsorption assay tests positive with convalescent sera | Antibiotics | |
| 18-month-old male | Fever, generalised rash, oral lesions, submandibular lymphadenopathy (after measles) | Developed respiratory distress syndrome at scabbing stage | Died | Viral isolation (lesion) | NR | |
| 4-year-old female | Fever; centrifugal rash (416 lesions); cervical, auricular, inguinal, and axillary lymphadenopathy; dehydration; weakness (had measles 1 month before) | NR | Recovered | Viral isolation (lesion) | NR | |
| 7-year-old, sex NR | Fever, rash (34 lesions), cervical and inguinal lymphadenopathy (had received smallpox vaccination at birth) | NR | Recovered | Viral isolation (lesion) | NR | |
| Khodakevich et al (1985)62; case series; Central African Republic; n=5 | ||||||
| Age and sex NR; total n=6 (of which n=5 children) | NR; aggregate data: cases had fever, rash (circular deep lesions), lymphadenopathy and mouth lesions in some | NR | NR | EM detected poxvirus particles (lesion) | NR | |
| Age and sex NR | Deep lesions 4–6 mm yellow-grey in colour, no umbilication; cervical and inguinal lymphadenopathy | NR | NR | EM detected poxvirus particles (lesion) | NR | |
| Age and sex NR | Deep lesions 4–6 mm yellow-grey in colour, no umbilication; cervical and inguinal lymphadenopathy (painless, 5–8 cm); buccal mucosal lesions 5–6 mm | NR | NR | EM detected poxvirus particles (lesion) | NR | |
| 10-month-old female | Rash, 40% of lesions on back; deep lesions 4–6 mm, yellow-grey in colour, no umbilication; buccal mucosal lesions 5–6 mm | NR | NR | EM detected poxvirus particles (lesion) | NR | |
| 10-year-old female | Rash (generalised including palms), cervical lymphadenopathy | NR | Recovered | EM detected poxvirus particles (lesion) | NR | |
| Janseghers et al (1984)43; Zaire; n=1 | ||||||
| 2·5-year-old male | Fever, malaise, rash (vesicles or pustules over arms, legs, palms, soles, genitals, face, mouth, tongue), bilateral conjuctivitis, palpebral lesions, splenomegaly | Developed pneumonia, then high fever and seizures | Died | EM-positive (lesion); viral culture-positive (lesion) | Penicillin, bronchodilators, chloramphenicolsteroids | |
| Mutombo et al (1983)44; case report; Zaire; n=1 | ||||||
| 6-month-old female | Fever, generalised rash, inguinal lymphadenopathy (severely bitten by chimpanzee before illness) | NR | Recovered | EM-positive (lesion) | NR | |
| Merouze et al (1983)77; case report; Côte d'Ivoire; n=1 | ||||||
| 3-year-old female | Fever; rash on face, scalp, palms, soles; conjunctival secretions | Nil | Recovered | EM-positive (sent to CDC Atlanta) and ELISA | Benzylpenicillin, moroxydine hydrochloride (antiviral) | |
| Breman et al (1977)78; outbreak report; Côte d'Ivoire; n=1 | ||||||
| 5-year-old male | Fever; rash on face, all over body including scalp, palms, soles—completely desquamated leaving scars; headache | Nil | Recovered | IFA-positive (late convalescent serum) | NR | |
| Ladnyj et al (1972)45; case report; DR Congo; n=1 | ||||||
| 9-month-old female | Fever, rash (haemorrhagic and centrifugal, lasted 2 weeks) | Otitis, mastoiditis, lymphadenitis during crusting stage; the latter required incision and drainage | Just before discharge, developed measles and died | Viral isolation at WHO reference laboratory | NR | |
| Foster et al (1972)83; case series identified by surveillance study; Liberia; n=5 | ||||||
| 4-year-old female | Fever, rash (deep, rare coalescence, on palms and soles) sore throat, malaise | NR | Recovered | Viral isolation (lesion) | NR | |
| 4-year-old male | Fever, mild rash (10 lesions) | NR | Recovered | Serology-positive | NR | |
| 6-year-old female | Mild rash (10 lesions) | NR | Recovered | Serology-positive | NR | |
| 9-year-old male | Rash (firm, deep-seated lesions, on face, legs, arms, palms, soles) | Lymphadenitis; pustular eye lesion and scar in cornea | Recovered | Viral isolation (lesion) | Lymphadenitis treated with penicillin | |
| 4-year-old female (only case from Nigeria) | Fever, malaise, headache, sweating, severe prostration, severe generalised rash (firm, discrete, deep lesions, including palms and soles) | Became toxic on 8th day of rash | Recovered | Viral isolation (lesion) | NR | |
| Eke et al (1972)65; case report; Nigeria; n=1 | ||||||
| 4-year-old female | Fever, malaise, headache, myalgia, anorexia, prostration, generalised rash (involving palms, soles, and oral mucosa), sore throat, marked splenomegaly | NR | Recovered | Viral culture-positive (lesion) | Penicillin, aspirin, chloroquine, vitamin B complex, iron | |
| Aggregate data | ||||||
| Pittman et al (2023)46; observational study; DR Congo; n=170 | ||||||
| Age range 0–18 years (total n including adults=244) | Aggregate data including adult data: skin lesions (99·5%), lymphadenopathy (98·6%), sore throat (78·2%), anorexia (50·0%), cough (48·1%), and chills (44·5%) | NR | 3/170 died | Aggregate including adult data; 216/244 were PCR-positive in both pan-orthopox and mpox-specific PCR | Empirical amoxicillin, antimalarials, mebendazole, analgesia, topical potassium permanganate | |
| Vaughan et al (2022)87; surveillance study; Europe‡; n=41 | ||||||
| Age range 0–17 years | Aggregate data including adult data; 95% had rash and 64·8% also at least one systemic symptom (fever, muscle pain, chills, headache) | 2/27 with information were hospitalised | 3 cases admitted to ICU, 2 deaths (encephalitis) | NR | NR | |
| Hennessee et al (2022)56; surveillance study; USA; n=83 | ||||||
| 16 aged 0–4 years; 12 aged 5–12 years; 55 aged 13–17 years; age 0–12 years, 64% male; age 13–17 years, 89% male | Children aged 0–12 years: lesions mostly occurred on trunk, no anogenital lesions; adolescents: lesions mostly occurred on trunk (33; 60%) and genitals or perianal area (33; 60%) | 11% hospitalised, no ICU admissions | No deaths | PCR-positive | In 28 children: 10 (36%) received tecovirimat; 1 (4%) received VIGIV; and 3 (11%) received topical trifluridine; in 55 adolescents: 8 (15%) received tecovirimat | |
| Aguilera-Alonso et al (2022)68; surveillance study; Spain; n=16 | ||||||
| 4 aged <4 years, 12 aged 13–17 years; age <4 years: 2 female, 2 male; age 13–17 years: 8 male, 4 female | Rash in 100%, lymphadenopathy in 31%, fever in 25%, asthenia in 13%, sore throat in 13%, myalgia in 6%, vomiting in 6%, diarrhoea in 6% | One child aged <4 years developed bacterial superinfection that required abscess drainage, managed as an outpatient | All recovered | Monkeypox virus or orthopoxvirus generic real-time PCR-positive | NR | |
| Besombes et al (2022)1; surveillance study; Central African Republic; n=89 | ||||||
| 63 aged 0–9 years; 26 aged 10–19 years | Aggregate data and including adult data; all (100%) confirmed-case patients had a rash, and most reported fever (93·2%), pruritus (81·5%), and lymphadenopathy (78·6%) | Aggregate and including adult data (keloid scars, septicaemia, bronchopneumonia, dehydration, fistulation of adenopathy) | CFR 8/83 (9·6%) in children aged <16 years (suspected and confirmed cases) | 50 confirmed (PCR-positive in blood), 39 suspected (clade I) | NR | |
| Whitehouse et al (2021)2; surveillance study; DR Congo; n=707 | ||||||
| Age range 0–19 years | Aggregate data | Aggregate data | Incidence highest among 5–9-year-olds (18·1 per 100 000) | PCR-positive | Aggregate data | |
| Johnston et al (2015)47; observational study; DR Congo; n=14 | ||||||
| Age range 1·5–17 years | Mild is <25 lesions, moderate is 25–99, severe is 100–250, serious is >250; 4 patients had serious disease, 4 severe, 4 moderate, and 2 mild | MIP-1 alpha and beta are elevated in cases of mild disease compared with moderate and severe; GM-CSF, IL-10, sIL-2R in extremely high concentrations in samples from serious disease | NR | Observational study | NR | |
| Hutin et al (2001)5; outbreak report; DR Congo; n=88 | ||||||
| Aggregate | NR | NR | 3/81 cases with follow-up died—all in children <3 years old | Aggregate: all 7 with active lesions were PCR-positive; 89% of all cases were orthopoxvirus antibody-positive | NR | |
| CDC (1997)51; outbreak report; Zaire; total n=92 (n=3 died) | ||||||
| Aggregate; age range 0–3 years | Rash (that did not look like chickenpox in an area with a chickenpox outbreak) | NR | 3 out of 3 that died were children | NR (suspected) | NR | |
| Jezek et al (1988)49; surveillance study; Zaire; n=315 | ||||||
| Age range 0–14 years | Aggregate data§ | Aggregate data but included blindness and “weak vision” | 33 deaths were all in children aged 3 months to 8 years; CFR=14·5% (0–4 year-olds) and 7·5% (5–9 year-olds) | Cases had “laboratory testing” of skin lesions or serum (probable) | NR | |
| Jezek et al (1988)48; surveillance study; Zaire; n=85 | ||||||
| Age range 0–14 years | Aggregate data; study period: 1981–85 in Bumba region, Zaire—possible overlap with above study | NR | 8 deaths (6 girls and 2 boys aged 7 months to 8 years) | Virus detection in 68 (lesion); serology in 20 and 3 died before specimen collection | NR | |
| Jezek et al (1987)23; surveillance study; Zaire; n=263 | ||||||
| Aggregate data 263 children (total n=282) | Aggregate data | Aggregate data but included: encephalitis, septicaemia, broncho-pneumonia, vomiting, diarrhoea and dehydration, keratitis, corneal opacities leading to impaired vision (a 4-year-old ended up with bilateral blindness and an 11 month-old and two 5-year-olds with unilateral blindness), scars deforming eyelids and nares, keloids, and alopecia | One child (aged 3 years) died of encephalitis and a 5-year-old with >4500 lesions died of septicaemia; 19 children died of bronchopneumonia | NR | NR | |
| Jezek et al (1987)50; serological survey; Zaire; n=19 seropositive | ||||||
| Aggregate data; total n=3460; n=27 total seropositive; n=19 seropositive children | Aggregate data; 7/19 seropositive children had no scars or history of disease | NR | NR | Serology | NR | |
| Breman et al (1980)88; outbreak report; west and central Africa; n=40; total n=47 | ||||||
| Aggregate data; children n=40 aged 7 months to 7 years | Aggregate data | NR | All 8 that died were children aged 7 months to 7 years | Virological or serological tests were done in all | NR | |
“n” denotes the number of paediatric cases with data available in each study. Of the countries included in this table, mpox is non-endemic in Brazil, France, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, and the USA, and endemic in Cameroon, Central African Republic, Côte d'Ivoire, DR Congo (formerly Zaire), Gabon, Liberia, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone, and Sudan. CDC=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CFR=case fatality ratio. CSF=cerebrospinal fluid. EM=electron microscopy. ICU=intensive care unit. IFA=immunofluorescence assay. IgG=immunoglobulin G. IgM=immunoglobulin M. IV=intravenous. NR=not reported. VIGIV=vaccinia immune globulin intravenous.
Tecovirimat was considered but discounted as there is no licence or dosing for patients <13 kg.
Probable case=one epidemiological factor plus fever and typical rash appearing less than 21 days after contact with an unwell animal or confirmed, probable, or suspected case.
Reporting countries: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Moldova, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland.
Significantly higher proportions of confluent exanthem, more numerous skin lesions, and more frequent enanthem in the oral cavity were found in patients infected from an animal source. However, there were no significant differences between those infected by an animal source, and those infected from human-to-human transmission in the duration of illness, frequency of complications and sequelae, or severity of illness, as characterised by the extent of the body lesions, intensity of systemic symptoms, physical incapacity and need for special care, or the crude CFRs.
Table 2.
Details of all included maternal and breastfeeding studies
| Clinical features and complications | Outcome | Laboratory diagnosis | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal studies | |||||
| Sampson et al (2023)57; case report; USA; n=1 | |||||
| Age of pregnant person: 20 years; gestational age when infected: 31 weeks | Labial ulcer and papular rash | Live birth at 39 weeks and 2 days (completely asymptomatic) | Neonate IgG-positive | Tecovirimat given to mother | |
| Oakley et al (2023)11; observational study; USA; n=23 | |||||
| Age of pregnant person: 20–35 years; gestational age when infected: among 10 cases with known trimester of infection: 3/10 (30%) occurred during the first, 4/10 (40%) during the second, and 3/10 (30%) during the third trimester | 4/10 (17·4%) were hospitalised (pain control and treatment of cellulitis) and remained pregnant at discharge; none required intensive care, intubation, or unplanned delivery | 3/21 had reported outcomes; 2/3 had full-term deliveries (no complications, no mother-to-child transmission); 1/3 miscarriage at 11 weeks | NR | 11/23 (48%) received tecovirimat (administered during all trimesters of pregnancy); no medication-related adverse events | |
| Ogoina et al (2020)21; retrospective observational study; Nigeria; n=1 | |||||
| Age of pregnant person: NR; gestational age when infected: 16 weeks (note: unknown if HIV-positive as 33·3% of women [3/9] were in this study) | NR (aggregate) | PROM at 16 weeks and intrauterine fetal death | Nil (suspected case) | NR | |
| Yinka-Ogunleye et al (2019)64; surveillance study; Nigeria; n=1 | |||||
| Age of pregnant person: NR; gestational age when infected: 26 weeks | Vesiculopustular rash | Spontaneous miscarriage at 26 weeks | PCR-positive or IgM-positive (aggregate) | NR | |
| Mbala et al (2017)8; observational study; DR Congo; n=4 | |||||
| Age of pregnant person: 20 years; gestational age when infected: 6 weeks | Vesiculopustular rash (76 lesions) | Miscarriage at 6 weeks | Maternal PCR-positive | Antibiotics, mebendazole, quinine | |
| Age of pregnant person: 25 years; gestational age when infected: 6–7 weeks | Vesiculopustular rash (1335 lesions) | Miscarriage at 6–7 weeks | Maternal PCR-positive | Antibiotics, mebendazole, quinine | |
| Age of pregnant person: 29 years; gestational age when infected: 14 weeks | Vesiculopustular rash (16 lesions) | Live birth | Maternal PCR-positive | Antibiotics, mebendazole, quinine | |
| Age of pregnant person: 22 years; gestational age when infected: 18 weeks | Vesiculopustular rash (113 lesions) | Fetal death | Maternal, placental, and fetal tissue PCR-positive | Antibiotics, mebendazole, quinine | |
| Doshi et al (2019)72; outbreak report; Republic of the Congo; n=1 | |||||
| Age of pregnant person: 33 years; gestational age when infected: “term” | NR | Admitted to hospital: outcome: “alive” | Orthopoxvirus IgG and IgM positive | NR | |
| Jezek et al (1983)9; case report; DR Congo; n=1 | |||||
| Age of pregnant person: NR; gestational age when infected: NR | Baby had neonatal rash, consistent with mpox | Died at 6·5 weeks of age (malnutrition) | NR | NR | |
| Breastfeeding studies | |||||
| Oakley et al (2023)11; observational study; USA; n=3 | |||||
| Age of child: 4 days | Maternal lesions including under breasts; newborn developed lesions on chest and face 6 days later; complications NR | Infant infected | NR | NR | |
| Age of child: NR | Developed “atypical” features of mpox after caring for mpox patient (health-care worker); breastfeeding at the time of mpox diagnosis; complications NR | NR | Breast milk PCR-negative | NR | |
| Alonso-Cadenas et al (2023)13; case report; Spain; n=1 | |||||
| Age of child: 7 months | Fever, rash (10 lesions), hyperaemic pharynx and petechial enanthema; complications NR | Survived | PCR-positive in lesion (breast milk not tested) | Nil | |
| Nakoune et al (2017)12; outbreak report; Central African Republic; n=1 | |||||
| Age of child: 15 months | Rash; was breastfeeding from mother but mother and siblings already unwell; complications NR | Died | NR | NR | |
Of the countries included in this table, mpox is non-endemic in Spain and the USA, and endemic in Central African Republic, DR Congo, and Republic of the Congo. IgG=immunoglobulin G. IgM=immunoglobulin M. NR=not reported. PROM=premature rupture of membranes.
39 studies reported individual paediatric outcomes in a total of 101 cases, of which 89 (88%) were from endemic countries (ie, countries where mpox cases were reported before the 2022 outbreak). 14 additional studies reported aggregated data for paediatric outcomes of interest among a total of 2022 cases, of which 1882 (93%) were from endemic countries, with potential overlap of cases in three studies (n=263,23 n=85,48 n=31549) carried out in overlapping time periods (1980–86) and regions (formerly Zaire, present day DR Congo).
Age was reported for 97 of 101 individual cases and ranged from 9 days to 18 years (median 4·5 years [IQR 2–9 years]; appendix 4 p 5). The median age of cases from non-endemic countries was lower compared with endemic countries (18 months [IQR 2 months to 8 years] vs 5 years [IQR 3–9 years]).
Among 101 paediatric cases, 59 (58%) were confirmed; of these 59, 42 (71%) were diagnosed by PCR (lesion or throat swab or blood) and 17 (29%) by viral isolation or culture of lesion fluid. An additional 16 (16%) of 101 cases met the probable case criteria and had positive immunoglobulin M (IgM) or immunoglobulin G (IgG) OPXV serology. The remaining 23 (23%) of 101 cases were probable or suspected cases—ie, clinical cases with or without positive OPXV serology (see appendix 4 pp 2–3 for full definitions).
Viral clade was available for six (7%) of 89 endemic cases (two clade II, four clade I) and for four (33%) of 12 non-endemic cases (two clade II, two clade IIb).
Symptom data were available in 86 of 101 children, in whom the most common symptoms were skin lesions (86 [100%]); fever (63 [73%; 95% CI 63–82]); lymphadenopathy or adenitis (40 [47%; 36–58]); dysphagia, tonsillitis, or pharyngitis (15 [17%; 10–27]); and conjunctivitis (nine [10%; 5–19]; figure 3). Among non-endemic cases, fever and lymphadenopathy were less frequent than among endemic cases (fever: one of 12 [8%; 95% CI 0–38] vs 62 of 74 [84%; 73–91]; lymphadenopathy: two of 12 [17%; 2–48] vs 38 of 74 [51%; 39–63]), and genital rash was present in one 18-year-old patient in France (appendix 4 p 6).
Figure 3.
Reported signs and symptoms of paediatric mpox cases (n=86)
Error bars show 95% CIs.
Complications were reported in 20 of 101 paediatric cases (20% [95% CI 13–29]). Among these 20 cases, bacterial infective complications occurred in 12 (60% [36–81]; table 1 and appendix 4 p 6). Ophthalmic complications such as corneal scarring were reported in two (10% [1–32]).52, 83
Large surveillance studies from DR Congo (n=263)23, 49 also reported on ophthalmic complications, with one reporting bilateral visual loss in one child and unilateral blindness in three children secondary to keratitis and corneal opacities.23
Tecovirimat use was reported in 21 patients aged 9 days to 17 years,52, 53, 56, 69 from the USA (n=20) and UK (n=1), with two possible overlapping cases.52, 56 Complications prompted treatment in some cases, including respiratory disease (respiratory failure requiring ventilation with secondary adenoviral infection; intravenous cidofovir was also given),69 ocular disease (corneal lesions and periorbital cellulitis),52 and cellulitis with eyelid lesions (VIGIV was also given).53 Other treatments used were supportive (table 1 and appendix 4 p 6).
Outcome data were available for 84 of 101 children, of whom 20 (24% [95% CI 15–34]) died. Sequential infections and co-infections featured in several cases. Two siblings died of coagulopathy and haemorrhage, one of whom had concurrent malaria in a study in Gabon,82 and one child hospitalised for malaria developed mpox in hospital (presumed nosocomial infection in Republic of the Congo).74 One child with mpox developed measles shortly before discharge and died in hospital;45 two other children who died42, 43 had measles shortly before becoming unwell with mpox in Republic of the Congo and DR Congo, respectively. One adolescent in the USA was diagnosed with concurrent HIV.56
A larger study looking at causes of death in 21 children with mpox in DR Congo23 reported that 19 children died of bronchopneumonia, one of encephalitis, and one of septicaemia.
Paediatric mortality data were pooled from seven outbreak reports or small case series7, 12, 42, 72, 74, 82, 83 and four surveillance studies or large case series, all from endemic countries.1, 46, 49, 88 CFRs ranged from 0% to 67%, with a pooled estimate of 11% (95% CI 4–20), I2=75% (figure 4).
Figure 4.
Forest plot of paediatric mpox CFRs reported by 11 studies
CFR=case fatality ratio. ES=effect size (in this case CFR).
Seven studies reported mpox in 32 pregnant individuals (table 2) from the USA (n=24, 75% of cases), DR Congo (n=5), Republic of the Congo (n=1), and Nigeria (n=2). Infections occurred between 6 weeks' and 31 weeks' gestation. In two of these 32 individuals, symptoms developed 3 days after delivery in a US study11 (included as maternal cases given the mpox incubation period of 5–21 days).89
Laboratory confirmation was available for 30 (94%) of 32 pregnancies. Among the 32 pregnancies, PCR positivity was confirmed in four (13%), and 24 (75%) were either PCR-positive or met the “probable” case laboratory criteria.90 Viral clade was not available for any maternal cases. Two cases (6%) had only serological test results.57 The remaining two (6%) had a clinical diagnosis.
An observational study of 23 pregnant cisgender women with mpox in the USA reported rash in 23 (100%; 17% with genital or breast lesions), fever in six (26%), lymphadenopathy in three (13%), and myalgia in two (9%).11 Individual symptom data from case reports for six maternal cases (table 2)8, 57, 64 only described a vesiculopustular rash (one had genital lesions).57 In one case in DR Congo, maternal symptoms were absent, but at birth the neonate was reported to have an mpox rash.9
Tecovirimat was used in 12 pregnant individuals throughout all trimesters in the USA.11, 57 No medication-related adverse events were reported. Two maternal cases in the USA occurred 3 days after delivery and their newborns developed lesions up to 1 week later (these might represent congenital or postnatal infections).11 Both newborns received oral tecovirimat for 10–14 days (one also received VIGIV), responded to treatment, and were discharged. Four pregnant individuals in DR Congo were given supportive treatments including antimicrobials.8
Outcome data were available for 12 of 32 pregnancies, of which six (50%; 95% CI 21–79), resulted in fetal death between 6 weeks' and 26 weeks' gestation in studies from DR Congo (n=3),8 Nigeria (n=2),21, 64 and the USA (n=1).11 The remaining six patients had live births at term. One infant in DR Congo died of malnutrition at 6·5 weeks of age.9 There were no maternal deaths. It was not possible to conduct a pooled estimate of fetal CFR as most studies were single case reports.
Post-mortem and pathology findings were available for one stillborn fetus delivered at 18 weeks' gestation by a patient in DR Congo with notable mpox viraemia (106 copies per mL; equivalent to cycle threshold of 22).8, 91, 92 The fetus had diffuse cutaneous maculopapillary lesions on the head, trunk, and extremities. Hydrops fetalis was detected, with marked hepatomegaly and a peritoneal effusion. The placenta had haemorrhages. This mother was also found to have malaria.8
Three case studies reported outcomes of four breastfeeding infants whose mothers had mpox in the USA (n=3),11 Central African Republic (n=1),12 and Spain (n=1; table 2).13 Breastmilk underwent PCR testing in one case11 and was negative for MPXV (the outcome for this case was not reported).11 The three infants with known outcomes were all infected and developed a rash11, 12, 13 and one died.12 Lesions on the chest were specifically reported in three cases.11, 12, 13 No specific antiviral treatments were given.
Two studies reported on the use of one dose of live, non-replicating vaccine to treat a total of 28 children (appendix 4 p 7).58, 71 The MVA-BN vaccine (IMVANEX) was administered to 21 children across three school and nursery outbreaks in the UK in 2022: seven aged 2–3 years, four aged 4–5 years, and ten aged 5–11 years.71 MVA-BN (JYNNEOS) vaccine and VIGIV were administered to seven children and one neonate, respectively, in two outbreaks in the USA, as post-exposure prophylaxis.58 There were no reported side-effects and no children developed mpox.
No studies published the experience of third-generation vaccine use during pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Discussion
Our data present the largest collection of paediatric and maternal mpox cases to date. Estimates of pooled paediatric CFR point to substantial mortality in children of up to 11% (95% CI 4–20) in endemic countries. Maternal infection results in fetal loss in 50% (95% CI 21–79) of cases (six of 12) across all trimesters. The use of antiviral and immunological treatments including tecovirimat, cidofovir, and VIGIV in childhood and pregnancy is supported by a small number of case reports. Finally, the third-generation vaccine was used uneventfully in a small paediatric population in the UK and USA.
Our data on the clinical features of paediatric mpox cases, the majority of which were from endemic countries (88%), are consistent with larger studies in endemic countries, indicating that in children, fever for 1–3 days before rash appearance and lymphadenopathy are common.1 This contrasts with clinical features reported in adolescents and young adults in the 2022 outbreak, where systemic features are rare and genital lesions common.93 These differences, which were also perceived among non-endemic cases in our study, are probably due to the viral clade (primarily IIb) and mode of transmission (through intimate contact) observed in the 2022 outbreak.93
Our pooled paediatric CFR obtained from studies in endemic countries showed high interstudy heterogeneity. Mpox CFR is known to vary by age (15% in 0–4-year-olds vs 8% in 5–9-year-olds)49 and viral clade. Clade I has a higher CFR (10·6%) than clade IIa and IIb (3·6%),94, 95 factors we were unable to control for in our review due to small numbers and unavailability of data.
Fetal death occurred in half of the pregnancies studied in this review, lower than reported in a previous study where it was noted to be as high as 77%.20 Additional data are awaited, including from large Brazilian datasets, to study this further.96
An understudied and probable contributary factor to the poor outcomes of paediatric and maternal mpox is the impact of concurrent or sequential infections.3 Among endemic cases, malaria was implicated in one maternal case resulting in a second trimester miscarriage,8 and five of 20 children who died had been recently diagnosed with measles42, 43, 45 or malaria.74, 82 HIV status was infrequently reported among paediatric cases,56 but is known to cause prolonged illness, larger lesions, and higher frequency of genital ulcers among adults and should be further studied in children.21
There are no completed randomised controlled trials investigating treatments for mpox, although five trials are ongoing, testing the effectiveness of tecovirimat, some of which include children.97 Low-level evidence has indicated a possible safety signal from brincidofovir resulting in mild liver injury in three individuals.97 VIGIV has been shown to be safe in immunosuppressed mice98, 99 and has been used to treat severe mpox in people living with HIV unresponsive to tecovirimat.100 Our data, from the USA and UK, on the experience of tecovirimat, cidofovir, and VIGIV use in children aged 0–17 years,53, 69 and tecovirimat use in pregnant individuals, provides some initial evidence of their utility.
Our study also found limited evidence, from the USA and UK, that live non-replicating smallpox vaccines can be given uneventfully for the prevention of mpox in children.58, 71 Recent data from seven children given the MVA-BN vaccine in the UK have also shown adequate antibody and cellular immune responses up to 15 weeks after vaccination.101
The key strengths of this study include the robust methodological approach and the meta-analysis of available data to provide the first contemporary estimates for mpox CFR in children. The evidence base does, however, have limitations. No randomised controlled trials or cohort studies were available, only observational studies (some with very low case numbers) and case reports. There was a reliance on clinical criteria for the detection of some cases and this might have affected the accurate calculation of incidence of infection and complications. The limitations in the ascertainment of the denominator might have also affected our meta-analysis and led to inflation of the CFR.102 Other potential limitations are the variability in the size of included studies, resulting in uneven weight contribution to the pooled estimate, and the inclusion of studies with small (n≤5) case numbers and the risk of “small study effects”.103
The ability to collect high-quality data in endemic regions is hampered by armed conflict and flooding104 affecting the highly endemic areas of Kasaï Oriental, North Kivu, and South Kivu in eastern DR Congo for over 30 years.105, 106 This has resulted in large-scale population displacement. As mobile populations move into forested areas, challenges in surveillance and control are compounded by a greater risk of zoonotic mpox transmission. Coupled with an increase in susceptible individuals since the cessation of the smallpox vaccination programme, this is likely to result in a further increase in mpox incidence.3, 4, 107, 108, 109, 110
Several recommendations are proposed. Firstly, funding and priority should be given to mpox surveillance (including improved zoonotic surveillance) and the collection of disaggregated longitudinal data in endemic regions. The creation of a global registry of cases is therefore indicated, to facilitate the further study of at-risk groups such as children and pregnant women and the role of co-factors that could worsen outcomes such as co-infections, genetic variants, and social determinants of health. Secondly, in parallel, scaling up of free testing with government backing must occur to support adequate case detection.111 Lastly, endemic populations must be included in clinical trials assessing novel treatments and vaccines. This includes appropriate vaccine allocation and distribution, prioritising the most at-risk groups in the endemic countries. These recommendations are in line with the WHO mpox strategic objectives to: (1) interrupt human-to-human transmission, with a focus on high-risk populations; (2) minimise zoonotic transmission; and (3) protect vulnerable groups at risk of severe mpox disease.112
These tasks will require close collaboration with stakeholders in endemic countries in global partnerships and the leveraging and re-purposing of existing technologies (eg, contact tracing or surveillance applications, mobile vaccine passports, and rapid PCR diagnostics) developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. We urge the international community to work collaboratively and think equitably about how we focus our research efforts as the mpox pandemic continues, to benefit the most at-risk populations in endemic countries.
Data sharing
Data collected for the study including the data collection tool, the study protocol, search terms, and any code used for the analysis will be shared with individuals upon reasonable request to the corresponding author from the time of publication of the Article.
Declaration of interests
SBD has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi for taking part in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) advisory boards and has provided consultancy and/or investigator roles in relation to product development for Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Valneva, MSD, iLiAD, and Sanofi with fees paid to St George's, University of London. SBD is a member of the UK Department of Health and Social Care's (DHSC) Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) RSV subcommittee and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's (MHRA) Paediatric Medicine Expert Advisory Group (PMEAG), but the reviews expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of DHSC, JCVI, MHRA, or PMEAG. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
KLD receives funding from a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship MR/X011100/1. ESP is funded by the Wellcome Trust Career Development Award 225925/Z/22/Z. We would like to thank Aisling Vaughan (WHO, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark) and Rosamund Lewis (Department for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response, Health Emergencies Programme, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland) for their invaluable input and insights that substantially contributed to the paper.
Editorial note: The Lancet Group takes a neutral position with respect to territorial claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributors
NSC, CC, PT, PA, and EVT curated the data and conducted the formal analysis. NSC and CC did the investigation. NSC, CC, ESP, EW, and EBB designed the methodology. NSC was responsible for project administration. NSC, CC, and ESP managed the resources and software. KLD, SBD, EBB, EW, TA, NAH, and J-JMT provided supervision. NSC, CC, PT, PA, ESP, and EVT validated the data. NSC, ESP, and CC created the figures. NSC wrote the original draft. NSC, CC, PT, SR, NAH, TA, ESP, EBB, EW, SBD, KLD, and J-JMT reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. NSC and CC directly accessed and verified the underlying data reported in the manuscript.
Supplementary Materials
References
- 1.Besombes C, Mbrenga F, Schaeffer L, et al. National monkeypox surveillance, Central African Republic, 2001–2021. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:2435–2445. doi: 10.3201/eid2812.220897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Whitehouse ER, Bonwitt J, Hughes CM, et al. Clinical and epidemiological findings from enhanced monkeypox surveillance in Tshuapa Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo during 2011–2015. J Infect Dis. 2021;223:1870–1878. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Beer EM, Rao VB. A systematic review of the epidemiology of human monkeypox outbreaks and implications for outbreak strategy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rimoin AW, Mulembakani PM, Johnston SC, et al. Major increase in human monkeypox incidence 30 years after smallpox vaccination campaigns cease in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:16262–16267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005769107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hutin YJ, Williams RJ, Malfait P, et al. Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:434–438. doi: 10.3201/eid0703.010311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khodakevich L, Jezek Z, Messinger D. Monkeypox virus: ecology and public health significance. Bull World Health Organ. 1988;66:747–752. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meyer H, Perrichot M, Stemmler M, et al. Outbreaks of disease suspected of being due to human monkeypox virus infection in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2919–2921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2919-2921.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mbala PK, Huggins JW, Riu-Rovira T, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant women with human monkeypox infection in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:824–828. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jezek Z, Gromyko AI, Szczeniowski MV. Human monkeypox. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1983;27:13–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schwartz DA, Ha S, Dashraath P, Baud D, Pittman PR, Adams Waldorf KM. Mpox virus in pregnancy, the placenta, and newborn. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023;147:746–757. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0520-SA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Oakley LP, Hufstetler K, O'Shea J, et al. Mpox cases among cisgender women and pregnant persons—United States, May 11– November 7, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:9–14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7201a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nakoune E, Lampaert E, Ndjapou SG, et al. A nosocomial outbreak of human monkeypox in the Central African Republic. Open Forum Infect. 2017;4 doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alonso-Cadenas JA, Andina-Martínez D, García-García CJ, Gaitero-Tristán J, García-Ascaso MT, Torrelo A. Monkeypox disease in a breastfeeding infant. Pediatr Dermatol. 2023;40:214–215. doi: 10.1111/pde.15145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Iñigo Martínez J, Gil Montalbán E, Jiménez Bueno S, et al. Monkeypox outbreak predominantly affecting men who have sex with men, Madrid, Spain, 26 April to 16 June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.27.2200471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S, et al. Monkeypox virus infection in humans across 16 countries—April–June 2022. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:679–691. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Adler H, Gould S, Hine P, et al. Clinical features and management of human monkeypox: a retrospective observational study in the UK. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:1153–1162. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00228-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Low N, Bachmann LH, Ogoina D, et al. Mpox virus and transmission through sexual contact: defining the research agenda. PLoS Med. 2023;20 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.WHO WHO Director-General declares the ongoing monkeypox outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. 2022. https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/23-07-2022-who-director-general-declares-the-ongoing-monkeypox-outbreak-a-public-health-event-of-international-concern
- 19.WHO Fifth meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) Emergency Committee on the Multi-Country Outbreak of mpox (monkeypox) 2022. https://www.who.int/news/item/11-05-2023-fifth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-(ihr)-emergency-committee-on-the-multi-country-outbreak-of-monkeypox-(mpox)
- 20.D'Antonio F, Pagani G, Buca D, Khalil A. Monkeypox infection in pregnancy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5 doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ogoina D, Iroezindu M, James HI, et al. Clinical course and outcome of human monkeypox in Nigeria. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:e210–e214. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sejvar JJ, Labutta RJ, Chapman LE, Grabenstein JD, Iskander J, Lane JM. Neurologic adverse events associated with smallpox vaccination in the United States, 2002–2004. JAMA. 2005;294:2744–2750. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.21.2744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jezek Z, Szczeniowski M, Paluku KM, Mutombo M. Human monkeypox: clinical features of 282 patients. J Infect Dis. 1987;156:293–298. doi: 10.1093/infdis/156.2.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gruber MF. Current status of monkeypox vaccines. NPJ Vaccines. 2022;7:94. doi: 10.1038/s41541-022-00527-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.UK Health Security Agency . UK Health Security Agency; London: 2013. Immunisation against infectious disease—The Green Book. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Beeson AM, Haston J, McCormick DW, et al. Mpox in children and adolescents: epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Pediatrics. 2023;151 doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rao AK, Petersen BW, Whitehill F, et al. Use of JYNNEOS (smallpox and monkeypox vaccine, live, nonreplicating) for preexposure vaccination of persons at risk for occupational exposure to orthopoxviruses: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:734–742. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7122e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Japanese Registry of Clinical Trials A single-arm study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of smallpox vaccine as vaccination to monkeypox in Japanese healthy adults. 2022. https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031220171
- 29.Titanji BK, Eick-Cost A, Partan ES, et al. Effectiveness of smallpox vaccination to prevent mpox in military personnel. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:1147–1148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2300805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lederman E, Miramontes R, Openshaw J, et al. Eczema vaccinatum resulting from the transmission of vaccinia virus from a smallpox vaccinee: an investigation of potential fomites in the home environment. Vaccine. 2009;27:375–377. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kamboj M, Sepkowitz KA. Risk of transmission associated with live attenuated vaccines given to healthy persons caring for or residing with an immunocompromised patient. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:702–707. doi: 10.1086/517952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Su JR, McNeil MM, Welsh KJ, et al. Myopericarditis after vaccination, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990–2018. Vaccine. 2021;39:839–845. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lesser D. Risk of contact vaccinia from immunization sites. JAMA. 2004;291:2313–2314. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.19.2313-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Badell ML, Meaney-Delman D, Tuuli MG, et al. Risks associated with smallpox vaccination in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:1439–1451. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hoy SM. Tecovirimat: first global approval. Drugs. 2018;78:1377–1382. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0967-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Russo AT, Grosenbach DW, Chinsangaram J, et al. An overview of tecovirimat for smallpox treatment and expanded anti-orthopoxvirus applications. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2021;19:331–344. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1819791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2022. Surveillance, case investigation and contact tracing for mpox (monkeypox): interim guidance, 22 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 39.StataCorp . StataCorp; College Station, TX: 2021. Stata Statistical Software: Release 18. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23:60–63. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Eltvedt AK, Christiansen M, Poulsen A. A case report of monkeypox in a 4-year-old boy from the DR Congo: challenges of diagnosis and management. Case Rep Pediatr. 2020;2020 doi: 10.1155/2020/8572596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jezek Z, Arita I, Mutombo M, Dunn C, Nakano JH, Szczeniowski M. Four generations of probable person-to-person transmission of human monkeypox. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:1004–1012. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Janseghers L, Matamba M, Colaert J, Vandepitte J, Desmyter J. Fatal monkeypox in a child in Kikwit, Zaire. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1984;64:295–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mutombo M, Arita I, Jezek Z. Human monkeypox transmitted by a chimpanzee in a tropical rain-forest area of Zaire. Lancet. 1983;1:735–737. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92027-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ladnyj ID, Ziegler P, Kima E. A human infection caused by monkeypox virus in Basankusu Territory, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Bull World Health Organ. 1972;46:593–597. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pittman PR, Martin JW, Kingebeni PM, et al. Clinical characterization and placental pathology of mpox infection in hospitalized patients in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Johnston SC, Johnson JC, Stonier SW, et al. Cytokine modulation correlates with severity of monkeypox disease in humans. J Clin Virol. 2015;63:42–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jezek Z, Grab B, Paluku KM, Szczeniowski MV. Human monkeypox: disease pattern, incidence and attack rates in a rural area of northern Zaire. Trop Geogr Med. 1988;40:73–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jezek Z, Grab B, Szczeniowski M, Paluku KM, Mutombo M. Clinico-epidemiological features of monkeypox patients with an animal or human source of infection. Bull World Health Organ. 1988;66:459–464. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jezek Z, Nakano JH, Arita I, Mutombo M, Szczeniowski M, Dunn C. Serological survey for human monkeypox infections in a selected population in Zaire. J Trop Med Hyg. 1987;90:31–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Human monkeypox—Kasai Oriental, Zaire, 1996–1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46:304–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ditta LC, Wojcik P, Minniear TD. Ocular presentation of Mpox in a healthy child without known exposure. J AAPOS. 2023;27:97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Saunders KE, Van Horn AN, Medlin HK, et al. Monkeypox in a young infant—Florida, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:1220–1221. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7138e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sejvar JJ, Chowdary Y, Schomogyi M, et al. Human monkeypox infection: a family cluster in the midwestern United States. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:1833–1840. doi: 10.1086/425039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Anderson MGJM, Frenkel LDM, Homann S, Guffey J. A case of severe monkeypox virus disease in an American child: emerging infections and changing professional values. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22:1093–1096. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000101821.61387.a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hennessee I, Shelus V, McArdle CE, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical features of children and adolescents aged <18 years with monkeypox—United States, May 17–September 24, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:1407–1411. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7144a4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sampson MM, Magee G, Schrader EA, et al. Mpox (monkeypox) infection during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141:1007–1010. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Minhaj FS, Petras JK, Brown JA, et al. Orthopoxvirus testing challenges for persons in populations at low risk or without known epidemiologic link to monkeypox—United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:1155–1158. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7136e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Besombes C, Gonofio E, Konamna X, et al. Intrafamily transmission of monkeypox virus, Central African Republic, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:1602–1604. doi: 10.3201/eid2508.190112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kalthan E, Tenguere J, Ndjapou SG, et al. Investigation of an outbreak of monkeypox in an area occupied by armed groups, Central African Republic. Med Mal Infect. 2018;48:263–268. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2018.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Herve VMA, Belec L, Yayah G, Georges AJ. [Monkeypox in central Africa. About two strains isolated in Central African Republic] Med Mal Infect. 1989;19:322–324. doi: 10.1016/S0399-077X(89)80242-2. (in French). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Khodakevich L, Widy-Wirski R, Arita I, Marennikova SS, Nakano J, Meunier D. Monkeypox in the Central African Republic. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1985;78:311–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ogoina D, Izibewule JH, Ogunleye A, et al. The 2017 human monkeypox outbreak in Nigeria—report of outbreak experience and response in the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. PLoS One. 2019;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yinka-Ogunleye A, Aruna O, Dalhat M, et al. Outbreak of human monkeypox in Nigeria in 2017–18: a clinical and epidemiological report. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:872–879. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30294-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Eke RA. Monkey-pox in a four-year old girl: case report. West Afr Med J Niger Pract. 1972;21:21–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Roguera Sopena M, Naqui Xicota L, Hernández Rodríguez Á, Méndez Hernández MJ, Rodrigo Gonzalo de Liria C. Monkeypox, also in pediatric age. An Pediatr (Engl Ed) 2022;97:426–427. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2022.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fuente SM, Nava FB, Valerio M, Veintimilla C, Aguilera-Alonso D. A call for attention: pediatric monkeypox case in a context of changing epidemiology. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2022;41:e548–e549. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Aguilera-Alonso D, Alonso-Cadenas JA, Roguera-Sopena M, Lorusso N, Miguel LGS, Calvo C. Monkeypox virus infections in children in Spain during the first months of the 2022 outbreak. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6:e22–e23. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00250-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ramnarayan P, Mitting R, Whittaker E, et al. Neonatal monkeypox virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:1618–1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2210828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hobson G, Adamson J, Adler H, et al. Family cluster of three cases of monkeypox imported from Nigeria to the United Kingdom, May 2021. Euro Surveill. 2021;26 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.32.2100745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ladhani SN, Aiano F, Edwards DS, et al. Very low risk of monkeypox among staff and students after exposure to a confirmed case in educational settings, England, May to July 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.40.2200734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Doshi RH, Guagliardo SAJ, Doty JB, et al. Epidemiologic and ecologic investigations of monkeypox, Likouala Department, Republic of the Congo, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:281–289. doi: 10.3201/eid2502.181222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Reynolds MG, Emerson GL, Pukuta E, et al. Detection of human monkeypox in the Republic of the Congo following intensive community education. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:982–985. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Learned LA, Reynolds MG, Wassa DW, et al. Extended interhuman transmission of monkeypox in a hospital community in the Republic of the Congo, 2003. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:428–434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sadeuh-Mba SA, Yonga MG, Els M, et al. Monkeypox virus phylogenetic similarities between a human case detected in Cameroon in 2018 and the 2017–2018 outbreak in Nigeria. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;69:8–11. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tchokoteu PF, Kago I, Tetanye E, Ndoumbe P, Pignon D, Mbede J. [Variola or a severe case of varicella? A case of human variola due to monkeypox virus in a child from the Cameroon] Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1991;71:123–128. (in French). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Merouze F, Lesoin JJ. [Monkeypox: second human case observed in Ivory Coast (rural health sector of Daloa] Méd Trop (Mars) 1983;43:145–147. (in French). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Breman JG, Nakano JH, Coffi E, Godfrey H, Gautun JC. Human poxvirus disease after smallpox eradication. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1977;26:273–281. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1977.26.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Del Giudice P, Fribourg A, Roudiere L, Gillon J, Decoppet A, Reverte M. Familial monkeypox virus infection involving 2 young children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:437–439. doi: 10.3201/eid2902.221674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Vallée A, Chatelain A, Carbonnel M, et al. Monkeypox virus infection in 18-year-old woman after sexual intercourse, France, September 2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:219–222. doi: 10.3201/eid2901.221643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Antonello VS, Cornelio PE, Dallé J. Disseminated neonatal monkeypox virus infection: case report in Brazil. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2023;42:e152–e153. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Meyer A, Esposito JJ, Gras F, Kolakowski T, Fatras M, Muller G. [First appearance of monkey pox in human beings in Gabon] Méd Trop (Mars) 1991;51:53–57. (in French). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Foster SO, Brink EW, Hutchins DL, et al. Human monkeypox. Bull World Health Organ. 1972;46:569–576. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tutu van Furth AM, van der Kuip M, van Els AL, et al. Paediatric monkeypox patient with unknown source of infection, the Netherlands, June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.29.2200552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Reynolds MG, Wauquier N, Li Y, et al. Human monkeypox in Sierra Leone after 44-year absence of reported cases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:1023–1025. doi: 10.3201/eid2505.180832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Formenty P, Muntasir MO, Damon I, et al. Human monkeypox outbreak caused by novel virus belonging to Congo Basin clade, Sudan, 2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1539–1545. doi: 10.3201/eid1610.100713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Vaughan AM, Cenciarelli O, Colombe S, et al. A large multi-country outbreak of monkeypox across 41 countries in the WHO European Region, 7 March to 23 August 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.36.2200620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Breman JG, Kalisa-Ruti, Steniowski MV, Zanotto E, Gromyko AI, Arita I. Human monkeypox, 1970–79. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58:165–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.UK Health Security Agency Mpox (monkeypox): background information. 2023. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/monkeypox
- 90.WHO Mpox (Monkeypox) outbreak toolbox. 2023. https://www.who.int/emergencies/outbreak-toolkit/disease-outbreak-toolboxes/mpox-outbreak-toolbox
- 91.Mitjà O, Ogoina D, Titanji BK, et al. Monkeypox. Lancet. 2023;401:60–74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02075-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Palich R, Burrel S, Monsel G, et al. Viral loads in clinical samples of men with monkeypox virus infection: a French case series. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23:74–80. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00586-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hoxha A, Kerr SM, Laurenson-Schafer H, et al. Mpox in children and adolescents during multicountry outbreak, 2022–2023. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:2125–2129. doi: 10.3201/eid2910.230516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2022. Clinical management and infection prevention and control for monkeypox: interim rapid response guidance. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bunge EM, Hoet B, Chen L, et al. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox—a potential threat? A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ministerio da Saude Boletim epidemiológico de monkeypox n° 22 (COE) 2023. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/boletins/epidemiologicos/variola-dos-macacos/boletim-epidemiologico-de-monkeypox-no-22-coe/view
- 97.Fox T, Gould S, Princy N, Rowland T, Lutje V, Kuehn R. Therapeutics for treating mpox in humans. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;3 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Shearer JD, Siemann L, Gerkovich M, House RV. Biological activity of an intravenous preparation of human vaccinia immune globulin in mouse models of vaccinia virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:2634–2641. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2634-2641.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ahmed SF, Sohail MS, Quadeer AA, McKay MR. Vaccinia-virus-based vaccines are expected to elicit highly cross-reactive immunity to the 2022 monkeypox virus. Viruses. 2022;14 doi: 10.3390/v14091960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Thet AK, Kelly PJ, Kasule SN, et al. The use of vaccinia immune globulin in the treatment of severe mpox. virus infection in human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76:1671–1673. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ladhani SN, Dowell AC, Jones S, et al. Early evaluation of the safety, reactogenicity, and immune response after a single dose of modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic vaccine against mpox in children: a national outbreak response. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23:1042–1050. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00270-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Islam M, Ahammed T, Ahmed Noor ST, et al. An estimation of five-decade long monkeypox case fatality rate: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2022;16(suppl 1):3036–3047. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Turner RM, Bird SM, Higgins JP. The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.UK Government Foreign travel advice: Democratic Republic of the Congo. 2023. https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/democratic-republic-of-the-congo
- 105.McCollum AM, Nakazawa Y, Ndongala GM, et al. Case report: human monkeypox in the Kivus, a conflict region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:718–721. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.UNHCR Emergency response for the situation in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. 2013. https://www.unhcr.org/in/media/emergency-response-situation-eastern-democratic-republic-congo-march-2013
- 107.Durski KN, McCollum AM, Nakazawa Y, et al. Emergence of monkeypox—west and central Africa, 1970–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:306–310. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6710a5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.McMullen CL, Mulembekani P, Hoff NA, et al. Human monkeypox transmission dynamics thirty years after smallpox eradication in the Sankuru district, Democratic Republic of Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(suppl 4):341. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Hoff N, Ilunga B, Shongo R, Muyembe J, Mossoko M, Okitolonda E. Human monkeypox disease surveillance and time trends in the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2001–2013. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;1 [Google Scholar]
- 110.Reynolds MG, Damon IK. Outbreaks of human monkeypox after cessation of smallpox vaccination. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20:80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Shomuyiwa DO, Manirambona E. Monkeypox virus declared as a global health emergency: what next for Africa's preparedness? Travel Med Infect Dis. 2023;53 doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2022. Monkeypox strategic preparedness, readiness, and response plan: operational planning guidelines. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data collected for the study including the data collection tool, the study protocol, search terms, and any code used for the analysis will be shared with individuals upon reasonable request to the corresponding author from the time of publication of the Article.




