Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2024 May 22;50(6):1060–1075. doi: 10.1002/biof.2081

Cholecystokinin neurotransmission in the central nervous system: Insights into its role in health and disease

Muhammad Asim 1,2,3,, Huajie Wang 1, Abdul Waris 2, Gao Qianqian 1, Xi Chen 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC11627476  PMID: 38777339

Abstract

Cholecystokinin (CCK) plays a key role in various brain functions, including both health and disease states. Despite the extensive research conducted on CCK, there remain several important questions regarding its specific role in the brain. As a result, the existing body of literature on the subject is complex and sometimes conflicting. The primary objective of this review article is to provide a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in understanding the central nervous system role of CCK, with a specific emphasis on elucidating CCK's mechanisms for neuroplasticity, exploring its interactions with other neurotransmitters, and discussing its significant involvement in neurological disorders. Studies demonstrate that CCK mediates both inhibitory long‐term potentiation (iLTP) and excitatory long‐term potentiation (eLTP) in the brain. Activation of the GPR173 receptor could facilitate iLTP, while the Cholecystokinin B receptor (CCKBR) facilitates eLTP. CCK receptors' expression on different neurons regulates activity, neurotransmitter release, and plasticity, emphasizing CCK's role in modulating brain function. Furthermore, CCK plays a pivotal role in modulating emotional states, Alzheimer's disease, addiction, schizophrenia, and epileptic conditions. Targeting CCK cell types and circuits holds promise as a therapeutic strategy for alleviating these brain disorders.

Keywords: addiction, Alzheimer's disease, emotional states, epilepsy, neuroplasticity, neurotransmitter, schizophrenia


The cholecystokinin and its receptors exhibit extensive expression throughout the brain, where they engage in interactions with various neurotransmitters. They play a crucial role in regulating behavioral phenotypes by modulating neuronal activities and plasticity in region‐specific or circuit‐specific manners.

graphic file with name BIOF-50-1060-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Neuropeptides are present in nearly all neurons within the brain. These bioactive molecules exert their effects by binding to G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs), 1 , 2 thereby modulating ion channels and modifying synaptic transmission mediated by classical neurotransmitters such as glutamate and Gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) if certain signaling pathways are activated. Recent technological advancements have shed light on the pivotal role of neuropeptides in regulating the central nervous system (CNS). Among various neuropeptides, cholecystokinin (CCK) holds significant importance for several reasons. First, CCK is the most abundant neuropeptide in the brain compared to any other known neuropeptide. 3 Second, CCK exhibits a distinct distribution pattern within the brain, with the highest expression observed in the cerebral cortex and amygdala. 4 , 5 , 6 Third, increasing evidence implicates CCK's involvement in several neurological disorders, including depression, anxiety, post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), epilepsy, and addiction. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9

Despite the significant involvement of CCK in brain disorders, numerous pivotal questions regarding its role in the brain remain unanswered, leading to a frequently perplexing body of literature. One major contributing factor to this complexity is the extensive molecular heterogeneity of CCK within the brain. 3 , 10 Over the past decade, our research group has clarified the indispensable role of CCK within the CNS in both health and disease states. 6 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 In this literature review, we aim to enhance our understanding of the key role of CCK in brain disorders. We present a historical overview of CCK, explore the mechanisms of neuroplasticity associated with CCK, examine its interactions with other neurotransmitters, and ultimately discuss its critical involvement in various brain disorders. A comprehensive analysis of preclinical and clinical findings was provided, placing primary emphasis on preclinical rodent models.

2. BRIEF HISTORY OF CCK

In 1856, a French physiologist discovered that hydrochloric acid stimulates bile flow in the duodenum. 18 In 1903, it was found that acid and soap in the duodenum release a substance that aids in bile secretion and flow. 19 In 1928, a hormone called CCK was identified as being responsible for gallbladder emptying in dogs. 20 It was later discovered that the vertebrate brain contains a small peptide called CCK, which reacts with gastrin antibodies. 21 Different forms of CCK have been identified, with CCK‐58 and CCK‐8 being the most prevalent. 3 , 22 , 23 In the gastrointestinal system, CCK is synthesized and released from I‐cells located in the small intestine. CCK is primarily released in response to the presence of fatty acids and plays a crucial role in the digestion of food. It exerts its effects by inhibiting gastric emptying, thereby slowing down the movement of food from the stomach to the small intestine. Additionally, CCK stimulates the secretion of pancreatic digestive enzymes, which aids in the breakdown of nutrients in the small intestine. 24 , 25 A recent study demonstrated that duodenal cells that express CCK play a role in regulating the preference for sugar over artificial sweeteners in mice. 26 In the brain, CCK is widely expressed in the cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, hypothalamus, and ventral tegmental area (VTA). 27 Considering that CCK cells in the small intestine aid in digestion and regulate sugar intake 26 and CCK cells in the brain region nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) control appetitive behaviors, 28 , 29 it is possible that there exists a signaling mechanism between the CNS and the peripheral nervous system to regulate food intake. However, direct evidence is currently lacking, and further investigations are needed to explore this possibility. CCK is found to be colocalized with various neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, such as dopamine, GABA, glutamate, serotonin, and endogenous opioid peptides. 30 This co‐localization suggests that CCK may interact with these molecules to modulate neuronal signaling and regulate physiological processes in the CNS. There are two types of CCK receptors in the CNS: CCKAR and CCKBR. 31 CCKAR is primarily expressed in the hippocampus and certain midbrain regions, while CCKBR is expressed in the neocortex, amygdala, and hippocampus to a lesser extent. 32 , 33 Recently, our research group discovered a new, third type of CCK receptor called GPR173 (CCKCR), which has implications for the plasticity of GABAergic synapses. 15 CCK receptors can interact with various G‐protein subtypes, similar to other GPCRs. For example, CCKBR interacts with both Gq and Gi proteins, while CCKAR predominantly interacts with Gq but also with Gi and Gs proteins to modulate downstream signaling pathways. 34 , 35

3. CCK‐MEDIATED NEUROPLASTICITY MECHANISM

Accumulating evidence revealed that memories are stored in neural networks through persistent modifications of synaptic strength, for instance via long‐term potentiation (LTP). 36 It is important to note that abnormal neuroplasticity changes have been implicated in the development of various brain disorders such as depression, PTSD, AD, and addiction. 6 , 17 , 37 , 38 Given that the neuropeptides play a pivotal role in modulating neuroplasticity, and CCK, being the most abundant neuropeptide in the brain, 4 implies its potential significance in mediating neuroplasticity.

3.1. Inhibitory long‐term potentiation

CCK was initially identified as a biomarker for subtypes of inhibitory neurons. 39 , 40 , 41 It has been observed that CCK increases GABA release onto dorsal medial hypothalamus neurons (DMH). 42 The GABA neurotransmitter plays a crucial role in regulating neural excitability and plasticity, as well as various associated behaviors such as pain perception, fear responses, social interaction, and memory formation. 43 , 44 Its involvement in maintaining balance within these processes is widely acknowledged within the scientific community. Whole‐cell patch clamp recordings of basolateral amygdala (BLA) neurons have shown that CCK increases the frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (sIPSPs) and this effect has lasted for 14 min. 45 , 46 This effect is blocked by the sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin, indicating that CCK's effect is mediated by the direct enhancement of GABAergic interneurons' activities. These neural activity‐induced changes can initiate synaptic plasticity alterations through transcriptional modifications, as well as via neurotransmitter release and other signaling mechanisms. 47

CCK release from GABAergic CCK+ neurons may trigger heterosynaptic LTP of other GABAergic interneurons, leading to an overall increase in sIPSPs. In the DMH, high‐frequency stimulation (HFS) of CCK+ neurons shifts the plasticity of GABAergic synapses from LTD to LTP, and this effect is mediated by CCKBR. 48 CCK has the ability to induce depolarization of parvalbumin‐expressing (PV+) neurons in the hippocampus, resulting in a reduction in excitability of glutamatergic neurons and an increase in inhibitory activity. 49 , 50 In contrast, hippocampal CA1 region CCK+ GABAergic neurons exert significant inverse regulatory control over PV+ and pyramidal neurons. 51 , 52 The activity of CCK+ GABAergic neurons is closely associated with spontaneous behavior in the hippocampus, indicating that these neurons play diverse roles in various brain regions. In the prefrontal cortex, CCK+ GABAergic neurons establish a broad array of connections, with the strongest connections observed between these neurons and pyramidal neurons. 53 Activation of these CCK+ GABAergic neurons predominantly regulates working memory, as opposed to other subtypes of interneurons.

Research has demonstrated that somatodendritic release of CCK from the VTA dopamine neurons triggers LTP of GABAergic synapses. 9 , 54 The release of CCK is mediated by trains of optogenetic stimuli or prolonged depolarization and is dependent on T‐type calcium channels. The depolarization‐induced LTP of GABAergic synapses is also blocked by a CCKBR antagonist. CCK acting through CCKBR, also enhances the inhibition of glutamatergic neurons in the olfactory bulb. 55 Activation of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) in the anterior piriform cortex and hippocampus led to a decrease in inhibitory synaptic transmission. 56 , 57 The presynaptic CB1R, known to be highly expressed on CCK+ GABAergic neurons, 57 , 58 , 59 has the capability to suppress the co‐release of CCK and GABA, thereby modulating inhibitory long‐term potentiation (iLTP). Pre‐synaptically targeted interneurons (e.g., CCK), can be influenced by firing activity in the post‐synaptic neurons while dendritically targeted interneurons (e.g., somatostatin [SST]) are affected by the activity of glutamatergic neurons. 60 Hence, the release of endocannabinoids (eCBs) from the post‐synaptic neuron can bind to presynaptic CB1R and modulate inhibitory plasticity. 61 Recent research discovered that CCK induces iLTP of GABAergic synapses specifically in the auditory cortex. 15 Importantly, this effect is mediated by a newly identified CCK receptor GPR173, rather than the CCKBR. There may be additional unidentified CCK receptors that have diverse roles in different brain functions including regulating synaptic plasticity. Since GPR173 enhances the inhibition of GABAergic synapses it has the potential to inhibit seizures in the animal model of epilepsy. 62 We hypothesize during HFS of CCK+ GABAergic neurons, there is a concomitant release of both GABA and CCK. Subsequently, CCK binds to the novel CCK receptor GPR173 on the postsynaptic membrane, resulting in an increase in the function of GABAAR and the induction of iLTP (Figure 1). However, it remains to be investigated whether the binding of CCK to GPR173 or the activation of GPR173 leading to increased synaptic recruitment of GABAAR is necessary for synaptic plasticity. Although CCK plays a crucial role in inhibitory plasticity, the contribution of other neurotransmitters such as GABA and neuropeptides like SST/Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) cannot be disregarded in this mechanism. Further investigation is warranted to comprehensively assess the involvement of GPR173 and CCKBR in regulating iLTP in other brain regions, including the VTA. Additionally, it is essential to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the release of CCK from presynaptic terminals and how this release modulates the activities of other inhibitory neurotransmitters, which in turn regulate plasticity and associated behaviors.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

CCK‐dependent iLTP. HFS but not LFS of CCK‐GABA neurons increases the release of CCK, which binds to postsynaptic GPR173. This binding leads to an overall increase in GABAergic inhibition and triggers the formation of iLTP. Additionally, CCK binding to GPR173 may enhance postsynaptic GABAar activity. It is also plausible that CB1R, NR2B, and mGluR expressed on the presynaptic terminals of GABAergic neurons may regulate the release of CCK in different pathways. CCK, cholecystokinin; HFS, high‐frequency stimulation; iLTP, inhibitory long‐term potentiation; LFS, low‐frequency stimulation.

3.2. Excitatory long‐term potentiation

While CCK was initially regarded as a biomarker for inhibitory neurons, subsequent studies have reported the presence of CCK in glutamatergic neurons. 8 , 12 , 63 CCK enhances excitatory long‐term potentiation (eLTP) at glutamatergic CCK synapses. For instance, the infusion of CCK in the auditory cortex of anesthetized rats enhances neuroplasticity and auditory response. 11 , 12 This effect is abolished by a CCKBR antagonist or CCK gene knockout, indicating the involvement of CCK in eLTP. Furthermore, NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation facilitates CCK release. It has been suggested that CCK release is triggered specifically by HFS. This is consistent with the theory proposing that neuropeptide release requires HFS of neurons. 64 CCK enhances the firing frequency of vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (vGluT2) cells and increases excitatory postsynaptic current in the rostral hypothalamic arcuate nucleus. 65 Given that the CCK is crucial for memory formation, this effect may be attributed to CCK‐mediated eLTP formation. Indeed, HFS of the entorhinal cortex (EC) CCK+ terminals in the auditory cortex facilitate heterosynaptic eLTP. 13 , 66 , 67 If pairing visual stimulus with an electrical stimulation of the auditory cortex when these CCK+ terminals are high‐frequently activated, this leads to the formation of visual–auditory association in the auditory cortex. CCK also mediates eLTP in the BLA, 6 CA3‐CA1, 16 , 52 and motor cortex (Mo). 14 While the importance of CCK in eLTP formation is established, the precise mechanism remains unknown.

Notably, a previous study demonstrated that CCK+ glutamatergic neurons express CB1R at presynaptic terminals in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), and the absence of CB1R triggers depressive phenotypes. 63 Hence, it would be intriguing to explore whether the CB1R mediates CCK release in the NAc and how the NMDAR or other receptors regulate CCK release and, consequently, eLTP. Additionally, identifying the downstream signaling molecules involved in eLTP formation is also important. Based on the available literature, we propose that presynaptic CCK release binds to postsynaptic CCKBR, triggering the activation of the Ras–Raf–MEK–MAPK pathway. This activation leads to the trafficking of AMPA receptors and ultimately induces eLTP (Figure 2). Considering the significance of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) presynaptic inhibition, 68 we speculate that they may also modulate CCK release either directly or through modulation of NMDAR. Additionally, mGluRs may inhibit CCK release through postsynaptic eCB release, 61 which in turn binds to presynaptic CB1R.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

CCK‐dependent eLTP. HFS of CCK+ glutamatergic neurons triggers the release of glutamate. The presence of glutamate is detected by presynaptic NMDA receptors, which then release CCK. CCK binds to CCKBR, potentially increasing AMPA activity directly or indirectly by activation of Ras–Raf–MEK–MAPK signaling pathways to facilitate eLTP. The release of CCK is inhibited by presynaptic CB1R, which is activated by the postsynaptic release of eCB mediated by mGluR5. Additionally, presynaptic mGluR could directly inhibit CCK release. CCK, cholecystokinin; eLTP, excitatory long‐term potentiation; HFS, high‐frequency stimulation.

Therefore, the novel receptor GPR173 can enhance iLTP, whereas CCKBR potentially regulates eLTP respectively. Collectively, these studies highlight the significant role of CCK in the formation of both eLTP and iLTP, emphasizing the importance of CCK in learning, memory formation, and storage. Future research should focus on examining the molecular mechanisms underlying the release of CCK from glutamatergic neurons in various circuits and brain regions, as well as the associated behaviors. Advanced techniques such as CRISPR‐Cas9 gene knockout strategies and GPCR‐based CCK sensors could be employed to investigate these phenomena.

4. INTERACTIONS OF CCK WITH OTHER NEUROTRANSMITTERS

In light of the established CCK's role in neuroplasticity, and considering the extensive distribution of CCK and its receptors throughout different brain regions where neurons expressing diverse neurotransmitters, such as dopamine and serotonin, it is reasonable to propose that CCK may exert regulatory effects on the release of these neurotransmitters and influence the plasticity of specific neural pathways (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Role of CCK Neurocircuitry and receptors in the brain. The CCK projection is known to influence behavior phenotypes in brain regions and circuits specifically, for example, EC to BLA, HIP, AC, and Mo facilitate the fear, spatial, auditory, and motor learning, respectively. CCK projections from NTS to PVH promote positive valence, BNST to LH trigger reinforcement, PBN to BNST inhibit salt intake, median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) inhibits water intake, and BLA to NAc mediate depression. However, further investigation is needed to understand the specific connections represented by the dashed arrows from BLA to LH, VTA, LC, and EW to DR. CCK receptors, including CCKBR, CCKAR, and GPR173, are distributed across several brain regions. CCKBR is found in HIP, BLA, LH, BNST, VTA, Mo, and AC and facilitates the LTP through CCK binding. CCKAR is located in HIP, PVH, NAc, BNST, and LH. GPR173 is primarily situated in AC and BLA, mediating iLTP. These receptors have the potential to modulate the effects of CCK when present on other neurons containing other neurotransmitters within these brain regions. AC, Auditory cortex; BLA, basolateral amygdala; BNST, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; CCK, cholecystokinin; DR, dorsal raphe; EC, entorhinal cortex; EW, Edinger Westphal; HIP, Hippocampus; LC, Locus coeruleus; LH, Lateral hypothalamus; LTP, long‐term potentiation; Mo, motor cortex; NAc, nucleus accumbens; NTS, nucleus of the solitary tract; PBN, Parabrachial nucleus; PVH, Paraventricular nucleus; VTA, ventral tegmental area.

4.1. CCK and GABA

CCK immunoreactive cells overlap with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)‐positive cells, indicating their inhibitory nature, and CCK probably interacts with GABA to modulate diverse behaviors, such as memory formation, 69 , 70 alcohol intake, 71 appetite regulation, 48 , 72 and stress‐induced emotional states. 73 , 74 The modulation of social isolation stress‐induced social avoidance behavior in mice is regulated by CB1R‐expressing CCK GABAergic neurons within the anterior cingulate cortex. 59 While the activation of CB1R is known to inhibit the GABA release. 75 Presynaptic GABA B receptors robustly suppress GABA release from CCK+ GABAergic neurons in the hippocampus, exhibiting a stronger effect compared to PV neurons. 76 These findings suggest that GABA B receptors may also exert inhibitory control over CCK release from CCK+ GABAergic neurons. GABA receptors are the primary targets of benzodiazepine drugs used for treating anxiety. A previous study indicated that chronic diazepam treatment, a benzodiazepine, reduces the excitatory effect of CCK. 77 This suggests that benzodiazepine drugs may influence stress‐induced anxiety‐like behavior through the CCK signaling pathway. However, there is currently no direct evidence to conclude whether benzodiazepines directly target CCK receptors or indirectly. Further investigation is needed to determine if benzodiazepines bind to CCK receptors, particularly the GPR173 receptor, which mediates iLTP at GABAergic CCK+ synapses. Furthermore, it would be intriguing to explore whether GABA alone can modulate the aforementioned behaviors following the knockdown of CCK, and vice versa.

4.2. CCK and glutamate

In addition to GABAergic neurons, CCK is expressed in glutamatergic neurons, suggesting their involvement in modulating glutamatergic synaptic plasticity and behavior. Indeed, the glutamate NMDAR facilitates CCK release from CCK+ glutamatergic terminals in the auditory cortex, mediating LTP and associative memory. 12 This effect was abolished in CCK gene knockout mice. CCK‐4 infusion induces panic attacks, 78 possibly due to the long‐term activation of CCK+ glutamatergic neurons and increased glutamate release. However, conflicting reports exist regarding glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex following CCK‐4 injection. 79 This discrepancy may arise from different experimental conditions, protocols, and improper statistical evaluation. CCK+ glutamatergic neurons influence various behaviors in different brain regions. For example, they control appetitive behavior in the NTS, 28 , 29 facilitate trace fear memory formation 8 affect depressive‐like phenotypes in the BLA, 6 regulate depressive‐like behavior in the NAc, 63 and mediate spatial, motor, auditory, and visual associative learning in the hippocampus (HIP), Mo, and auditory cortex (AC), 11 , 13 , 14 , 16 respectively. Targeting CCK+ glutamatergic neurons holds promise to enhance memory formation and alleviate disease states, but further research is needed to understand the advantages and disadvantages of manipulating them. For example, inhibiting CCK release or blocking CCK receptors in the BLA alleviates depression, 6 while decreased CCK levels or blocking CCK receptors in the AC impairs learning. 12 Therefore, advancements in technology are necessary to selectively manipulate CCK genes in certain circuits to control specific behaviors or treat specific brain disorders. Analysis of human postmortem RNA sequences from prefrontal cortex regions revealed functional and anatomical heterogeneity among neuropeptides, with the highest expression level observed of neuropeptide CCK, which is expressed in both GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons. 80 Mouse neocortical transcriptomic studies indicated that CCK is expressed in nearly all glutamatergic neurons of the cortex, suggesting a potential critical role for CCK in modulating cortical glutamatergic neuronal plasticity and homeostasis. 81 Future investigations are necessary to explore whether the release of CCK alone can modulate cortical neuronal activities, plasticity, and associated behaviors, particularly in scenarios involving region‐specific glutamate knockdown, circuit‐specific knockdown, or this effect is mediated by corelease of glutamate.

4.3. CCK and serotonin

The dorsal raphe (DR) region contains serotonergic neurons, while neighboring nuclei Edinger Westphal (EW) house CCK+ neurons, 82 suggesting a potential interaction between CCK and serotonin. In fact, CCK activates serotonergic neurons in the DR via the CCKAR. 83 CCK+ neurons are also influenced by neurotransmitters linked to mood disorders, including serotonin and the cholinergic system. For example, blocking 5‐HT1a receptors reversed aversion‐related behavior induced by CCK‐8, 84 and inhibiting 5‐HT3 receptors increased CCK release in the frontal cortex. 85 On the other hand, CCK‐4, a CCKBR agonist, elevated serotonin levels and induced anxiety‐like behavior, which were prevented by a CCKBR antagonist. 86 CCK‐4 can induce panic attacks, but chronic treatment with the serotonin reuptake inhibitor imipramine reduces CCK‐4‐induced panic attacks. 87 Moreover, depleting serotonin in mice decreases CCK levels. 88 5‐HT1B receptors on presynaptic terminals of CCK+ GABAergic neurons inhibit GABA release, affecting granule cell activity in the HIP associated with antidepressant responses. 89 While early studies demonstrated a close interaction between CCK and serotonin, recent research is limited. Based on previous findings and observations that CCKBR antagonists impair LTP in the BLA and mediate antidepressant effects, it is proposed that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may exert their antidepressant effects by also blocking CCKBR. Investigating the correlation between SSRIs and CCK signaling in animal models of mood‐related disorders, particularly depression, would be important.

4.4. CCK and opioids

While the role of CCK in modulating GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses for anxiety and panic behaviors has been extensively studied, there is emerging evidence suggesting that CCK may also interact with opioids and mediate anti‐opioid functions via the mesolimbic pathways. 90 CCKBR knockout mice exhibit increased endogenous opioid levels, 91 and CCKBR agonists block the analgesic effect of morphine while antagonists enhance it. 92 This implies that CCK agonists may activate nociceptive pathways by blocking the peripheral and spinal opioid system, and reducing opioid tone could potentially modulate panic behaviors and analgesic responses. Further investigation could involve increasing opioid tone using an opioid agonist to prevent CCK‐4‐induced panic attacks or exploring whether a standard opioid antagonist induces panic symptoms in patients with panic disorder. Previous studies indicate that CCK mediates both nociceptive and antinociceptive effects, influenced by factors such as dosage, receptor type, and administration route. 93 , 94 For instance, oral administration of a CCKAR antagonist enhances morphine's analgesic effect and reverses opiate tolerance in mice. 95 Additionally, upregulation of the CCKBR facilitates somatic hyperalgesia through the MAPK pathway, 96 and a CCKBR antagonist in the NAc blocks morphine‐induced conditioned place preference. 97 On the other hand, activation of CCKAR restores morphine‐induced impairment of hippocampal LTP, 98 and CCK attenuates conditioned place aversion and anxiety‐like behavior triggered by naloxone. 99 , 100 Opioid receptors are present on CCK neurons, 101 suggesting a reciprocal control between opioids and CCK release in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Indeed, chronic opioid administration increases CCK release and the CCKBR level in the CNS, 102 , 103 while opioid agonists decrease CCK release in the peripheral nervous system. 104 However, the detailed mechanisms underlying the interaction between CCK and opioids in pain modulation within peripheral and CNSs remain unclear and require further investigation.

4.5. CCK and dopamine

The dopamine system is known for its involvement in reward processing, appetitive behaviors, self‐stimulation, and schizophrenia. 105 Recent research has revealed interactions between CCK and dopamine. For instance, CCK mediates the blocking effect of geranylgeranyacetone on morphine‐induced conditioned place preference via targeting dopaminergic neurons. 106 CCK coexists with dopamine in the mesolimbic pathway and acts as a modulator of dopaminergic function in rodents. 30 Consistent with this notion, studies have found that CCKAR activation potentiates dopamine‐stimulated adenylate cyclase in the medial posterior NAc and dopamine‐induced hyperlocomotion, while CCKBR activation inhibits them via targeting the rostral NAc. 107 Somatodendritic release of CCK from VTA dopaminergic neurons triggers LTP of GABAergic synapses and reduces food intake and dopamine‐induced calcium activity. 9 Although the interaction between CCK and dopamine in the mesolimbic pathway modulates dopamine function related to drug abuse and schizophrenia, it may not directly contribute to the mechanism of CCK‐4‐induced panic attacks. The mesocortical pathway, involved in stress regulation, may be implicated in CCK‐4‐induced panic attacks. CCK‐mediated potentiation of VTA‐GABAergic signaling likely activates GABAergic input to the prefrontal cortex, potentially mediating panic behavior. 108 Animal models could be used to test the hypothesis that CCK‐4 induces panic attacks through the activation of mesocortical pathways. In summary, the interaction between CCK and dopamine plays a crucial role in various behaviors, including schizophrenia, reward processing, and stress responses.

4.6. CCK and norepinephrine (noradrenaline)

The locus coeruleus is known for its high norepinephrine expression, 109 and lesioning it increased CCK receptor density in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of rats. 110 It is established that CCK‐4 induces panic attacks, and norepinephrine regulates aversive behaviors. 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 Therefore, it is highly plausible that CCK‐4 may induce panic attacks through increased norepinephrine signaling. Indeed, CCK‐4 treatment increases norepinephrine and epinephrine levels in healthy volunteers. 115 In contrast, Yohimbine, an alpha‐2 adrenergic receptor antagonist, induces panic attacks and increases plasma norepinephrine in Parkinson's disease patients. 116 Probably due to reduced norepinephrine inputs to the frontal cortex and hippocampus increasing CCK sensitivity. Bennett et al. demonstrated that norepinephrine affected somatostatin+ and CCK+ interneurons without influencing fast‐spiking and late‐spiking neurons. 117 CCK modulates norepinephrine release in the hypothalamus, 118 suggesting CCK's role in flight, hunger, and satiety behaviors. Indeed, CCK was found to potentiate NTS cell activity via adrenergic and glutamatergic signaling. 119 Overall, CCK modulates norepinephrine levels in the CNS and influences fundamental survival behaviors.

While the interaction between CCK and other neurotransmitters has been discussed, the precise mechanism remains elusive due to the majority of research being conducted in the 20th century. Recent technological advancements, such as the development of GPCRs‐based sensors, 120 and CRISPR‐mediated cell type‐specific gene knockout, offer opportunities to gain a better understanding of the role and interaction of CCK with other neurotransmitters, as well as the regulation of synaptic plasticity and neurotransmitter release. Hence, it would be fascinating to investigate the timing of CCK and other neurotransmitter release during specific behavioral tasks, as well as determine whether CCK or other neurotransmitters are released first.

5. ROLE OF CCK IN THE CNS DISORDERS

Considering the abnormal neuroplastic changes associated with CNS disorders 6 , 17 , 37 , 38 and the established role of CCK in neuroplasticity as discussed above. In this section, we explore the role of CCK in CNS disorders, including emotional states, AD, addiction, epilepsy, and schizophrenia.

5.1. Role of CCK in emotional states (PTSD, anxiety, and depression)

Numerous studies indicate the significant role of CCK in the regulation of emotions, such as fear, 8 panic attacks, 87 PTSD, 38 and depression. 6 A clinical study showed that the CCK gene polymorphism is associated with PTSD in combat veterans. 121 Rodent studies have found the involvement of CCK in anxiety and depression, but they lacked in‐depth exploration of the underlying mechanisms. 122 , 123 , 124 The amygdala, a crucial region involved in emotional regulation, 125 , 126 exhibits a high expression of CCKBR. Our recent research demonstrates that chronic stress activates CCKBR in the BLA, and blocking CCKBR impairs LTP formation and exhibits antidepressant‐like effects. 6 This suggests that the impairment of LTP in the BLA is a crucial underlying mechanism behind the antidepressant effects. CCK‐expressing glutamatergic neurons of BLA project to the NAc and their activation has been observed to exhibit phenotypes associated with depression. 63 In mice, the administration of ketamine, a rapid‐acting antidepressant, through infusion into the NAc has been shown to alleviate behaviors resembling PTSD. 38 , 127 This therapeutic effect of ketamine may be attributed to the modulation of CCK signaling in the NAc. Previous studies mainly focused on the role of classical neurotransmitters or neuromodulators like glutamate, GABA, serotonin, and dopamine in stress‐induced emotional states. 5 , 126 , 128 , 129 Since CCK receptors are expressed in the VTA, DR, and NAc, 130 the above‐established interaction between CCK, dopamine, and serotonin in these areas suggests that CCK may modulate emotional behaviors by influencing the plasticity or release of these neurotransmitters. Indeed, a study showed that CCK+ neurons modulate dopamine release and plasticity in the VTA. 9 The central amygdala (CeA) neurons project to the VTA 131 and DR, 132 and the release of CCK in the amygdala is involved in triggering emotional states and amygdala hyperactivity. 6 Thus, another possible mechanism could be the CeA‐GABAergic projection to the DR and VTA, inhibiting the release of serotonin and dopamine, respectively, and leading to the development of emotional states. However, future studies are required to test this hypothesize. Previous studies revealed mGluR5 implication in emotional states. 133 , 134 , 135 While mGluR5 agonist inhibit CCK release. 136 Hence, we hypothesize that the mGluR5 through CCK release modulate the emotional states. It is previously known that mGluR5 inhibits presynaptic release via eCB‐CB1R signaling, 137 , 138 and CB1R is present on presynaptic glutamatergic 139 and CCK+ glutamatergic terminals. 63 , 74 Therefore, reduced mGluR5 levels following stress may downregulate eCB signaling and CB1R‐mediated presynaptic inhibition of CCK release, leading to emotional state change. These studies underscore the crucial role of CCK in emotional regulation and suggest interactions with various neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in depressive disorders. However, further research is needed to gain a comprehensive understanding of mechanisms in additional brain regions and neural circuits.

5.2. Role of CCK in AD

AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline. In AD, alterations in amyloid β‐peptide and tau protein have been observed in the EC and hippocampus, 140 , 141 key brain regions for learning and memory. The EC, enriched with CCK‐positive neurons, is particularly affected in AD. 8 , 66 , 142 A recent study has demonstrated that individuals with AD exhibit dysregulation of CCK levels along with abnormal tau peptide expression. 143 Given that EC CCK is crucial for memory formation including spatial, fear, motor, and visual–auditory associative memory, 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 66 the decreased CCK mRNA levels in the EC with aging 144 suggest its potential as an AD biomarker. A human study demonstrated that higher levels of CCK in cerebrospinal fluid are associated with better memory performance and reduced risk of AD impairment. 145 In the 5XFAD mouse model of AD, there were observed deficits in LTP formation within the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex regions. 146 , 147 The established role of CCK in LTP formation, 6 , 12 , 13 , 66 a cellular mechanism associated with memory formation, further supports its role in AD. CCK+ neurons in the EC project to the hippocampus, where they mediate LTP in the CA3‐CA1 pathways. 16 Disruption of this pathway not only impairs LTP but also hampers spatial memory formation. In our recent study on 3xTg AD mice, we observed that reduced CCK levels and CCKBR expression in AD mouse models led to impaired LTP and cognition, while CCKBR agonist treatment improved memory formation, 17 extending the importance of CCK in AD treatment.

Collectively, these findings highlight CCK's role in memory formation and suggest its involvement in AD pathogenesis. Activation of EC CCK+ pathways may hold therapeutic potential for AD and decreased CCK levels could serve as a biomarker. Further research is needed to understand CCK's mechanisms in memory formation, its impact on Aβ and tau, and the development of more effective CCK agonists with improved stability, bioactivity, and half‐life holds promise for AD treatment.

5.3. Role of CCK in addiction

Addiction is closely associated with alterations in the brain's reward network. Addictive drugs enhance activity in dopaminergic neurons of the VTA, 148 , 149 leading to dopamine release in the NAc. The discovery of CCK co‐localization with VTA dopaminergic neurons has sparked interest in its role in addiction, 150 suggesting its potential role in modulating addiction. Indeed, addictive drugs affect CCK mRNA levels in the brain's reward system. 151 Further studies have shown an inverse relationship between CCK levels in the VTA, dopaminergic neuron activities, and drug self‐administration. For instance, blocking or knockout CCK receptors increases baseline dopaminergic neuron activities and potentiates dopamine release in response to addictive drugs. 152 , 153 A recent study also revealed that the CCK released by VTA dopaminergic neurons triggers iLTP, and inhibiting CCK receptors impairs iLTP. 9 CCK+ neurons in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) are activated by rewarding cues and promote reinforcing behavior. 154 Cocaine‐induced neuroplasticity in the VTA involves NMDAR, 37 and CCK release is mediated by NMDAR in the cortex, 12 further suggesting CCK synergy in addictive behavior. Since CCK is expressed in the VTA 150 and plays a role in LTP, 9 it is reasonable to conclude that CCK plays a vital role in the regulation of addictive behavior. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Future studies are needed to explore in detail how CCK modulates dopamine levels or signaling pathways in other brain regions and its impact on addictive behavior. Additionally, it would be valuable to investigate whether CCK release in the VTA and other brain regions is also controlled by NMDAR. Based on these findings, it is plausible to consider CCK targeting as a promising avenue for addiction treatment.

5.4. Role of CCK in epilepsy

Epilepsy is a chronic disorder of the CNS that affects approximately 39 million people worldwide, with an estimated prevalence of seizures in around 1% of the population in Hong Kong. 155 , 156 It can be categorized into generalized epilepsy, involving widespread brain involvement and generalized seizures, and localization‐related epilepsy, characterized by abnormalities restricted to specific brain regions and partial or secondarily generalized seizures. 157 Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), originating from the temporal lobe, is the most common form of localization‐related epilepsy.

CCK, a neuropeptide associated with the inhibitory system, has been studied in the context of epilepsy. Research has demonstrated alterations in CCK expression and release in epilepsy. For instance, studies conducted on patients with TLE have observed heightened CCK mRNA expression in the cortical samples, while the actual CCK content has been found to be reduced in the temporal cortex. 158 These alterations may be attributed to the persistent release of CCK in the brains of TLE patients due to the abnormal firing of CCK neurons within the temporal cortex. Moreover, rat models of epilepsy induced by kainic acid or kindling have also shown increased CCK mRNA levels in the brain. 159 , 160 , 161 In contrast, the anticonvulsive effects of CCK8, a specific form of CCK, have been investigated in various seizure models, demonstrating delayed onset and improved seizure control. 162 , 163 This effect may be attributed to the mediation of CCK‐8 binding to GPR173, which enhances the inhibition of GABAergic neurons, potentially leading to an overall inhibition of cortical region. In the hippocampus, the depolarization of PV+ cells by CCK occurs via the activation of CCKBR receptors located on PV+ cells. This process is mediated through a pertussis‐toxin‐sensitive pathway, ultimately resulting in a decrease in the excitability of excitatory neurons, 49 , 50 suggesting another potential mechanism for the anticonvulsive effect of CCK. However, the large molecular weight of CCK8 and its limited penetration through the blood–brain barrier raises questions about its efficacy. Under normal physiological conditions, neurons in the deep layers of the EC exhibit lower burst propensity compared to superficial layers. 164 However, in epilepsy, synchronized and high‐frequency neuronal firing occurs. Recent findings suggest that CCK+ neurons in the EC, with extensive cortical projections, release CCK during high‐frequency stimulation, playing a crucial role in cortical neuroplasticity. 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 66 In light of these findings, we speculated that seizures, characterized by high‐frequency firing and CCK release in the cortex, may enhance CCK concentration, strengthening excitatory connections and facilitating seizure propagation. In epilepsy patients with elevated CCK levels, the peptide could activate CCKBR and further strengthen excitatory connections in the cortex. Consequently, administering CCKBR antagonists to epilepsy models could potentially suppress this process and alleviate epilepsy. These studies highlight the significant involvement of CCK signaling in seizure induction, suggesting overactivation of CCK signaling as a potential mechanism in epilepsy. However, further research is needed to fully comprehend the detailed mechanisms underlying CCK‐mediated seizure propagation and develop novel drug targets for the treatment of epilepsy, particularly in patients with treatment‐resistant epilepsy.

5.5. Role of CCK in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a severe disease that leads to psychosis, characterized by a range of symptoms. Positive symptoms of schizophrenia include hallucinations, disorganized speech, and abnormal movements, while negative symptoms include social withdrawal, anhedonia (inability to experience pleasure), and a lack of emotions. 165 Researchers have observed structural and functional changes in specific brain regions, such as the prefrontal cortex and mesostriatal brain regions, among individuals with schizophrenia. 166 , 167 The dopamine system has been extensively studied for its role in psychosis, which is a key symptom of schizophrenia. 105 Notably, dopaminergic input to limbic regions is known to be involved in positive psychotic symptoms, while input to the frontal cortex regulates negative psychotic symptoms. 168 Furthermore, CCK, a neuropeptide that coexists with dopamine, has been implicated in the development of schizophrenia. 9 CCK GABAergic neurons, which are a major population of inhibitory neurons in the prefrontal cortex, play a role in regulating working memory retrieval. 53 The expression of CB1R in CCK neurons further supports the involvement of CCK in schizophrenia, as the overuse of cannabinoids has been shown to increase the risk of schizophrenia. 169 Clinical studies have reported impaired CCK‐GABAergic signaling in the prefrontal cortex of schizophrenia patients. 170 , 171 Additionally, a specific single‐nucleotide polymorphism of the CCKAR gene, characterized by a higher frequency of the C allele, has been found in individuals with schizophrenia. 172 CCKAR gene polymorphism has also been associated with auditory hallucinations and language lateralization. 173 , 174 Moreover, CCK gene polymorphism has been linked to an increased risk of smoking behavior. 175 Interestingly, patients with Parkinson's disease who experience hallucinations have also shown an increased prevalence of CCK T and CCKAR C allele polymorphisms. 176 Taken together, these findings suggest that targeting CCK signaling holds potential for the treatment of schizophrenia and psychosis.

6. CONCLUDED REMARKS AND PERSPECTIVE

Over the past decade, studies have explored the physiological roles of CCK and its association with neurological disorders, leading to further investigations. Understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying CCK's adaptive responses is crucial for comprehending nervous system development, plasticity, and function. CCK exhibits heterogeneity in its responses based on factors such as brain region, neural circuit, and neuron subtype.

CCK plays a critical role in both eLTP and iLTP formation, 9 , 12 , 13 , 66 which contributes to memory formation in neuronal networks. However, our understanding of CCK release mechanisms in different brain regions is limited, presenting an opportunity to investigate the molecular machinery involved in CCK‐mediated synaptic plasticity. Impaired CCK plasticity may contribute to various neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases, highlighting the need for a mechanistic understanding of CCK for developing targeted therapeutic interventions. For instance, CCK‐dopamine signaling in addiction and emotional states underscores the importance of such knowledge, although specific developmental stages and human midbrain diversity of CCK require further exploration.

Recent technological advancements, such as CCK GPCR‐dependent sensors, 120 have enabled the detection of CCK release during behavioral tasks, overcoming challenges posed by its rapid degradation. These advancements create new opportunities to explore CCK's role in behavior modulation and develop potential targets for severe CNS disorders. Future studies utilizing these sensitive tools will provide novel insights into CCK's role in the CNS in both healthy and diseased states.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

The manuscript was written and reviewed by Muhammad Asim and Xi Chen. Huajie Wang contributed to figure preparation and manuscript revision. Abdul Waris and Gao Qianqian authored the section on the role of CCK in schizophrenia and also participated in the manuscript revision. All authors reviewed the final draft and provided their approval.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Asim M, Wang H, Waris A, Qianqian G, Chen X. Cholecystokinin neurotransmission in the central nervous system: Insights into its role in health and disease. BioFactors. 2024;50(6):1060–1075. 10.1002/biof.2081

Contributor Information

Muhammad Asim, Email: muhamasim5@cityu.edu.hk.

Xi Chen, Email: xi.chen@cityu.edu.hk.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Tanaka H, Yoshida T, Miyamoto N, Motoike T, Kurosu H, Shibata K, et al. Characterization of a family of endogenous neuropeptide ligands for the G protein‐coupled receptors GPR7 and GPR8. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:6251–6256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Moody TW, Ramos‐Alvarez I, Jensen RT. Neuropeptide G protein‐coupled receptors as oncotargets. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rehfeld JF. Cholecystokinin and the hormone concept. Endocr Connect. 2021;10:R139–R150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rehfeld JF. Immunochemical studies on cholecystokinin. II. Distribution and molecular heterogeneity in the central nervous system and small intestine of man and hog. J Biol Chem. 1978;253:4022–4030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Asim M, Wang H, Waris A. Altered neurotransmission in stress‐induced depressive disorders: the underlying role of the amygdala in depression. Neuropeptides. 2023;98:102322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang X, Asim M, Fang W, Md Monir H, Wang H, Kim K, et al. Cholecystokinin B receptor antagonists for the treatment of depression via blocking long‐term potentiation in the basolateral amygdala. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhang X, Zhou D, Zhang P, Wei J. The CCK‐A receptor gene possibly associated with positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2000;5:239–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Feng H, Su J, Fang W, Chen X, He J. The entorhinal cortex modulates trace fear memory formation and neuroplasticity in the mouse lateral amygdala via cholecystokinin. Elife. 2021;10:e69333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Damonte VM, Pomrenze MB, Manning CE, Casper C, Wolfden AL, Malenka RC, et al. Somatodendritic release of cholecystokinin potentiates GABAergic synapses onto ventral tegmental area dopamine cells. Biol Psychiatry. 2023;93:197–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Larsson L‐I, Rehfeld J. Localization and molecular heterogeneity of cholecystokinin in the central and peripheral nervous system. Brain Res. 1979;165:201–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li X, Yu K, Zhang Z, Sun W, Yang Z, Feng J, et al. Cholecystokinin from the entorhinal cortex enables neural plasticity in the auditory cortex. Cell Res. 2014;24:307–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chen X, Li X, Wong YT, Zheng X, Wang H, Peng Y, et al. Cholecystokinin release triggered by NMDA receptors produces LTP and sound–sound associative memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:6397–6406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zhang Z, Zheng X, Sun W, Peng Y, Guo Y, Lu D, et al. Visuoauditory associative memory established with cholecystokinin under anesthesia is retrieved in behavioral contexts. J Neurosci. 2020;40:2025–2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Li H, Feng J, Chen M, Xin M, Chen X, Wang K, et al. Cholecystokinin from the Rhinal Cortex Facilitates Motor Skill Learning. bioRxiv. 2022.2011.2021.517378. 2022.
  • 15. He L, Shi H, Zhang G, Peng Y, Ghosh A, Zhang M, et al. A novel CCK receptor GPR173 mediates potentiation of GABAergic inhibition. J Neurosci. 2023;43:2305–2325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Su J, Huang F, Tian Y, Tian R, Qianqian G, Bello ST, et al. Entorhinohippocampal cholecystokinin modulates spatial learning by facilitating neuroplasticity of hippocampal CA3‐CA1 synapses. Cell Rep. 2023;42:113467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang N, Sui Y, Jendrichovsky P, Feng H, Shi H, Zhang X , et al. Cholecystokinin B receptor agonists alleviates anterograde amnesia in CCK‐deficient and aged Alzheimer's disease mice. Alz Res Therapy. 2024;16:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bernard C. Mémoire sur le pancréas et sur le rôle du suc pancréatique dans les phénomènes digestifs, particulièrement dans la digestion des matières grasses neutres. Paris: J.‐B. Baillière; 1856. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Fleig C. Réflex de l'acide sur la secretion biliaire. Compte Rendue de Societe Biologique. 1903;55:353–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ivy A, Oldberg E. A hormone mechanism for gall‐bladder contraction and evacuation. Am J Physiol. 1928;86:599–613. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Robberecht P, Deschodt‐Lanckman M, Vanderhaeghen J‐J. Demonstration of biological activity of brain gastrin‐like peptidic material in the human: its relationship with the COOH‐terminal octapeptide of cholecystokinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75:524–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Eysselein V, Reeve J Jr, Eberlein G. Cholecystokinin—gene structure, and molecular forms in tissue and blood. Z Gastroenterol. 1986;24:645–659. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hadjiivanova C, Belcheva S, Belcheva I. Cholecystokinin and learning and memory processes. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg. 2003;27:83–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Liddle RA. Regulation of cholecystokinin secretion by intraluminal releasing factors. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 1995;269:G319–G327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chaudhri O, Small C, Bloom S. Gastrointestinal hormones regulating appetite. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361:1187–1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Buchanan KL, Rupprecht LE, Kaelberer MM, Sahasrabudhe A, Klein ME, Villalobos JA, et al. The preference for sugar over sweetener depends on a gut sensor cell. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:191–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Beinfeld MC. An introduction to neuronal cholecystokinin. Peptides. 2001;22:1197–1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. D'Agostino G, Lyons DJ, Cristiano C, Burke LK, Madara JC, Campbell JN, et al. Appetite controlled by a cholecystokinin nucleus of the solitary tract to hypothalamus neurocircuit. Elife. 2016;5:e12225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Arnold RA, Fowler DK, Peters JH. TRPV1 enhances cholecystokinin signaling in primary vagal afferent neurons and mediates the central effects on spontaneous glutamate release in the NTS. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2024;326:C112–C124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Moran T, Schwartz G. Neurobiology of cholecystokinin. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1994;9:1–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Moran TH, Robinson PH, Goldrich MS, McHugh PR. Two brain cholecystokinin receptors: implications for behavioral actions. Brain Res. 1986;362:175–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wank SA. Cholecystokinin receptors. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 1995;269:G628‐46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Karthik L, Kumar G, Keswani T, Bhattacharyya A, Chandar SS, Rao KB. Protease inhibitors from marine actinobacteria as a potential source for antimalarial compound. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Liu Q, Yang D, Zhuang Y, Croll TI, Cai X, Dai A, et al. Ligand recognition and G‐protein coupling selectivity of cholecystokinin A receptor. Nat Chem Biol. 2021;17:1238–1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zhang X, He C, Wang M, Zhou Q, Yang D, Zhu Y, et al. Structures of the human cholecystokinin receptors bound to agonists and antagonists. Nat Chem Biol. 2021;17:1230–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Josselyn SA, Tonegawa S. Memory engrams: recalling the past and imagining the future. Science. 2020;367:eaaw4325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Tovar‐Díaz J, Pomrenze MB, Kan R, Pahlavan B, Morikawa H. Cooperative CRF and α1 adrenergic signaling in the VTA promotes NMDA plasticity and drives social stress enhancement of cocaine conditioning. Cell Rep. 2018;22:2756–2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Asim M, Wang B, Hao B, Wang X. Ketamine for post‐traumatic stress disorders and it's possible therapeutic mechanism. Neurochem Int. 2021;146:105044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Taniguchi H, He M, Wu P, Kim S, Paik R, Sugino K, et al. A resource of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in cerebral cortex. Neuron. 2011;71:995–1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Fasano C, Rocchetti J, Pietrajtis K, Zander J‐F, Manseau F, Sakae DY, et al. Regulation of the hippocampal network by VGLUT3‐positive CCK‐GABAergic basket cells. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cleary CM, Milla BM, Kuo F‐S, James S, Flynn WF, Robson P, et al. Somatostatin‐expressing parafacial neurons are CO2/H+ sensitive and regulate baseline breathing. Elife. 2021;10:e60317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Crosby KM, Baimoukhametova DV, Bains JS, Pittman QJ. Postsynaptic depolarization enhances GABA drive to dorsomedial hypothalamic neurons through somatodendritic cholecystokinin release. J Neurosci. 2015;35:13160–13170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Schmidt MJ, Horváth S, Ebert P, Norris JL, Seeley EH, Brown J, et al. Modulation of behavioral networks by selective interneuronal inactivation. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:580–587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhang W, Xiong B‐R, Zhang L‐Q, Huang X, Yuan X, Tian Y‐K, et al. The role of the GABAergic system in diseases of the central nervous system. Neuroscience. 2021;470:88–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Chung L, Moore S. Cholecystokinin enhances GABAergic inhibitory transmission in basolateral amygdala. Neuropeptides. 2007;41:453–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Chung L, Moore S. Neuropeptides modulate compound postsynaptic potentials in basolateral amygdala. Neuroscience. 2009;164:1389–1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Hogan MK, Hamilton GF, Horner PJ. Neural stimulation and molecular mechanisms of plasticity and regeneration: a review. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Crosby KM, Murphy‐Royal C, Wilson SA, Gordon GR, Bains JS, Pittman QJ. Cholecystokinin switches the plasticity of GABA synapses in the dorsomedial hypothalamus via astrocytic ATP release. J Neurosci. 2018;38:8515–8525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Földy C, Lee SY, Szabadics J, Neu A, Soltesz I. Cell type–specific gating of perisomatic inhibition by cholecystokinin. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1128–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Lee SY, Földy C, Szabadics J, Soltesz I. Cell‐type‐specific CCK2 receptor signaling underlies the cholecystokinin‐mediated selective excitation of hippocampal parvalbumin‐positive fast‐spiking basket cells. J Neurosci. 2011;31:10993–11002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Dudok B, Klein PM, Hwaun E, Lee BR, Yao Z, Fong O, et al. Alternating sources of perisomatic inhibition during behavior. Neuron. 2021;109:e1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Asim M, Wang H, Chen X. Shedding light on cholecystokinin's role in hippocampal neuroplasticity and memory formation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024;159:105615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Nguyen R, Venkatesan S, Binko M, Bang JY, Cajanding JD, Briggs C, et al. Cholecystokinin‐expressing interneurons of the medial prefrontal cortex mediate working memory retrieval. J Neurosci. 2020;40:2314–2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Rice ME. Seeing a tree within the forest: selective detection and function of somatodendritic cholecystokinin release from dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Biol Psychiatry. 2023;93:110–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Liu X, Liu S. Cholecystokinin selectively activates short axon cells to enhance inhibition of olfactory bulb output neurons. J Physiol. 2018;596:2185–2207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Hartzell AL, Martyniuk KM, Brigidi GS, Heinz DA, Djaja NA, Payne A, et al. NPAS4 recruits CCK basket cell synapses and enhances cannabinoid‐sensitive inhibition in the mouse hippocampus. Elife. 2018;7:e35927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Terral G, Varilh M, Cannich A, Massa F, Ferreira G, Marsicano G. Synaptic functions of Type‐1 cannabinoid receptors in inhibitory circuits of the anterior piriform cortex. Neuroscience. 2020;433:121–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Chou S, Fish KN, Lewis DA, Sweet RA. Terminal type‐specific cannabinoid CB1 receptor alterations in patients with schizophrenia: a pilot study. bioRxiv 2023.2004.2011.536217. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 59. Guo B, Xi K, Mao H, Ren K, Xiao H, Hartley ND, et al. CB1R dysfunction of inhibitory synapses in the ACC drives chronic social isolation stress‐induced social impairments in male mice. Neuron. 2023;112:441–457.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Chiu CQ, Barberis A, Higley MJ. Preserving the balance: diverse forms of long‐term GABAergic synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20:272–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Albarran E, Sun Y, Liu Y, Raju K, Dong A, Li Y, et al. Postsynaptic synucleins mediate endocannabinoid signaling. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26:997–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. He L, Yang Y, Ren J, Zhang Y, Che L, Yoon E, et al. A new therapy of epilepsy by enhancing inhibition of gabaergic neurons. 10.2139/ssrn.3931632 [DOI]
  • 63. Shen C‐J, Zheng D, Li K‐X, Yang J‐M, Pan H‐Q, Yu X‐D, et al. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the amygdalar cholecystokinin glutamatergic afferents to nucleus accumbens modulate depressive‐like behavior. Nat Med. 2019;25:337–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Hökfelt T. Neuropeptides in perspective: the last ten years. Neuron. 1991;7:867–879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. van den Pol AN, Acuna C, Davis JN, Huang H, Zhang X. Defining the caudal hypothalamic arcuate nucleus with a focus on anorexic excitatory neurons. J Physiol. 2019;597:1605–1625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Sun W, Wu H, Peng Y, Tang P, Zhao M, Zheng CX, et al. Heterosynaptic plasticity of the visuo‐auditory projection requires cholecystokinin released from entorhinal cortex afferents. bioRxiv 2022.2010.2004.510820. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67. Li X, He L, Hu X, Huang F, Wang X, Chen M, et al. Interhemispheric cortical long‐term potentiation in the auditory cortex requires heterosynaptic activation of entorhinal projection. Iscience. 2023;26:106542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Joffe ME, Santiago CI, Oliver KH, Maksymetz J, Harris NA, Engers JL, et al. mGlu2 and mGlu3 negative allosteric modulators divergently enhance thalamocortical transmission and exert rapid antidepressant‐like effects. Neuron. 2020;105:46–59.e43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Whissell PD, Bang JY, Khan I, Xie Y‐F, Parfitt GM, Grenon M, et al. Selective activation of cholecystokinin‐expressing GABA (CCK‐GABA) neurons enhances memory and cognition. eNeuro. 2019;6:ENEURO.0360‐18.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Vancura B, Geiller T, Grosmark A, Zhao V, Losonczy A. Inhibitory control of sharp‐wave ripple duration during learning in hippocampal recurrent networks. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Ballaz S, Espinosa N, Bourin M. Does endogenous cholecystokinin modulate alcohol intake? Neuropharmacology. 2021;193:108539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Matsuda T, Kobayashi K, Kobayashi K, Noda M. Two parabrachial CCK neurons involved in the feedback control of thirst or salt appetite. Cell Rep. 2024;43:113619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Calakos KC, Blackman D, Schulz AM, Bauer EP. Distribution of type I corticotropin‐releasing factor (CRF1) receptors on GABAergic neurons within the basolateral amygdala. Synapse. 2017;71:e21953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. McDonald AJ. Expression of the type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) in CCK‐immunoreactive axon terminals in the basolateral amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Neurosci Lett. 2021;745:135503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Zhang M, Li C, Xue Q, Lu C‐B, Zhao H, Meng F‐C, et al. Activation of cannabinoid receptor 1 in GABAergic neurons in the rostral anterior insular cortex contributes to the analgesia following common peroneal nerve ligation. Neurosci Bull. 2023;39:1348–1362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Shao C, Dong J, Zhao M, Liu S, Wang X, Yu Y, et al. Presynaptic GABAB receptors differentially modulate GABA release from cholecystokinin and parvalbumin interneurons onto CA1 pyramidal neurons: a cell type‐specific labeling and activating study. Neurosci Lett. 2022;772:136448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Harro J, Lang A, Vasar E. Long‐term diazepam treatment produces changes in cholecystokinin receptor binding in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990;180:77–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Zwanzger P, Zavorotnyy M, Gencheva E, Diemer J, Kugel H, Heindel W, et al. Acute shift in glutamate concentrations following experimentally induced panic with cholecystokinin tetrapeptide—a 3T‐MRS study in healthy subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:1648–1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Ruland T, Domschke K, Schütte V, Zavorotnyy M, Kugel H, Notzon S, et al. Neuropeptide S receptor gene variation modulates anterior cingulate cortex Glx levels during CCK‐4 induced panic. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25:1677–1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Zhong W, Barde S, Mitsios N, Adori C, Oksvold P, Feilitzen KV, et al. The neuropeptide landscape of human prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2123146119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Smith SJ, Sümbül U, Graybuck LT, Collman F, Seshamani S, Gala R, et al. Single‐cell transcriptomic evidence for dense intracortical neuropeptide networks. Elife. 2019;8:e47889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Pomrenze MB, Walker LC, Giardino WJ. Gray areas: neuropeptide circuits linking the Edinger‐Westphal and Dorsal Raphe nuclei in addiction. Neuropharmacology. 2021;198:108769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Boden P, Woodruff G, Pinnock R. Pharmacology of a cholecystokinin receptor on 5‐hydroxytryptamine neurones in the dorsal raphe of the rat brain. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;102:635–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Bickerdike M, Fletcher A, Marsden C. Attenuation of CCK‐induced aversion in rats on the elevated x‐maze by the selective 5‐HT1A receptor antagonists (+) WAY100135 and WAY100635. Neuropharmacology. 1995;34:805–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Raiteri M, Paudice P, Vallebuona F. Inhibition by 5‐HT 3 receptor antagonists of release of cholecystokinin‐like immunoreactivity from the frontal cortex of freely moving rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1993;347:111–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Rex A, Fink H, Marsden C. Effects of BOC‐CCK‐4 and L 365.260 on cortical 5‐HT release in Guinea‐pigs on exposure to the elevated plus maze. Neuropharmacology. 1994;33:559–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Bradwejn J, Vasar E. Cholecystokinin and anxiety: from neuron to behavior. In: Bradwejn J, Vasar E , editors. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Weidner MT, Lardenoije R, Eijssen L, Mogavero F, De Groodt LP, Popp S, et al. Identification of cholecystokinin by genome‐wide profiling as potential mediator of serotonin‐dependent behavioral effects of maternal separation in the amygdala. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Medrihan L, Sagi Y, Inde Z, Krupa O, Daniels C, Peyrache A, et al. Initiation of behavioral response to antidepressants by cholecystokinin neurons of the dentate gyrus. Neuron. 2017;95:564–576.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Hebb AL, Poulin J‐F, Roach SP, Zacharko RM, Drolet G. Cholecystokinin and endogenous opioid peptides: interactive influence on pain, cognition, and emotion. Prog Neuro‐Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2005;29:1225–1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Pommier B, Beslot F, Simon A, Pophillat M, Matsui T, Dauge V, et al. Deletion of CCK2 receptor in mice results in an upregulation of the endogenous opioid system. J Neurosci. 2002;22:2005–2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Noble F, Benturquia N, Crete D, Canestrelli C, Mas Nieto M, Wilson J, et al. Relationship between vulnerability to reinforcing effects of morphine and activity of the endogenous cholecystokinin system in Lewis and Fischer rats. Addict Biol. 2012;17:528–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Higgins GA, Nguyen P, Sellers EM. Morphine place conditioning is differentially affected by CCKA and CCKB receptor antagonists. Brain Res. 1992;572:208–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Gibula‐Tarlowska E, Kotlinska JH. Crosstalk between opioid and anti‐opioid systems: an overview and its possible therapeutic significance. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Lattmann E, Sattayasai J, Balaram P, Lattmann P. CCK‐antagonist PNB‐081 (isobutyl‐5‐hydroxy‐5‐phenyl‐pyrrol‐2‐one) as adjunct to opiates. ARC J Pharm Sci. 2018;4:13–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Duan L‐L, Qiu X‐Y, Wei S‐Q, Su H‐Y, Bai F‐R, Traub RJ, et al. Spinal CCK contributes to somatic hyperalgesia induced by orofacial inflammation combined with stress in adult female rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2021;913:174619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Mitchell JM, Bergren LJ, Chen KS, Fields HL. Cholecystokinin is necessary for the expression of morphine conditioned place preference. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2006;85:787–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Wen D, Zang G, Sun D, Yu F, Mei D, Ma C, et al. Cholecystokinin‐octapeptide restored morphine‐induced hippocampal long‐term potentiation impairment in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2014;559:76–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Yu H, Wen D, Ma C, Meng Y, Li S, Ni Z, et al. Effects of exogenous cholecystokinin octapeptide on acquisition of naloxone precipitated withdrawal induced conditioned place aversion in rats. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Wen D, Sun D, Zang G, Hao L, Liu X, Yu F, et al. Cholecystokinin octapeptide induces endogenous opioid‐dependent anxiolytic effects in morphine‐withdrawal rats. Neuroscience. 2014;277:14–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Benoliel J, Mauborgne A, Bourgoin S, Legrand J, Hamon M, Cesselin F. Opioid control of the in vitro release of cholecystokinin‐like material from the rat substantia Nigra. J Neurochem. 1992;58:916–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Rodriguez R, Sacristan M. In vivo release of CCK‐8 from the dorsal horn of the rat: inhibition by DAGOL. FEBS Lett. 1989;250:215–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. You Z‐B, Tzschentke TM, Brodin E, Wise RA. Electrical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex increases cholecystokinin, glutamate, and dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens: an in vivo microdialysis study in freely moving rats. J Neurosci. 1998;18:6492–6500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Stanfa LC, Dickenson AH. Cholecystokinin as a factor in the enhanced potency of spinal morphine following carrageenin inflammation. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;108:967–973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Ballaz S. The unappreciated roles of the cholecystokinin receptor CCK (1) in brain functioning. Rev Neurosci. 2017;28:573–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Guo N, Zhang L, Fan W, Bai L, Zhang X, Shi Z, et al. Inhibition of geranylgeranylacetone on cholecystokinin‐B receptor, BDNF and dopamine D1 receptor induced by morphine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;588:23–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Marshall F, Barnes S, Hughes J, Woodruff G, Hunter J. Cholecystokinin modulates the release of dopamine from the anterior and posterior nucleus accumbens by two different mechanisms. J Neurochem. 1991;56:917–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Stuber GD, Britt JP, Bonci A. Optogenetic modulation of neural circuits that underlie reward seeking. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:1061–1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Schwarz LA, Luo L. Organization of the locus coeruleus‐norepinephrine system. Curr Biol. 2015;25:R1051–R1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Harro J, Jossan SS, Oreland L. Changes in cholecystokinin receptor binding in rat brain after selective damage of locus coeruleus projections by DSP 4 treatment. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1992;346:425–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Cases O, Seif I, Grimsby J, Gaspar P, Chen K, Pournin S, et al. Aggressive behavior and altered amounts of brain serotonin and norepinephrine in mice lacking MAOA. Science. 1995;268:1763–1766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Guan X, Cao P. Brain mechanisms underlying panic attack and panic disorder. Neurosci Bull. 2023;1–20. 10.1007/s12264-023-01088-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Iqbal Z, Lei Z, Ramkrishnan AS, Liu S, Hasan M, Akter M, et al. Adrenergic signalling to astrocytes in anterior cingulate cortex contributes to pain‐related aversive memory in rats. Commun Biol. 2023;6:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Stanley AT, Post MR, Lacefield C, Sulzer D, Miniaci MC. Norepinephrine release in the cerebellum contributes to aversive learning. Nat Commun. 2023;14:4852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Jerabek I, Boulenger J‐P, Bradwejn J, Lavallée Y‐J, Jolicoeur FB. CCK4‐induced panic in healthy subjects I: psychological and cardiovascular effects. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1999;9:149–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Charney DS, Woods S, Krystal JH, Nagy L, Heninger G. Noradrenergic neuronal dysregulation in panic disorder: the effects of intravenous yohimbine and clonidine in panic disorder patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992;86:273–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Bennett B, Huguenard J, Prince D. Adrenergic modulation of GABAA receptor‐mediated inhibition in rat sensorimotor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:937–946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Myers R, Swartzwelder H, Peinado J, Lee T, Hepler J, Denbow D, et al. CCK and other peptides modulate hypothalamic norepinephrine release in the rat: dependence on hunger or satiety. Brain Res Bull. 1986;17:583–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Hisadome K, Reimann F, Gribble FM, Trapp S. CCK stimulation of GLP‐1 neurons involves α1‐adrenoceptor–mediated increase in glutamatergic synaptic inputs. Diabetes. 2011;60:2701–2709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Wang H, Qian T, Zhao Y, Zhuo Y, Wu C, Osakada T, et al. A tool kit of highly selective and sensitive genetically encoded neuropeptide sensors. Science. 2023;382:eabq8173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Badour CL, Hirsch RL, Zhang J, Mandel H, Hamner M, Wang Z. Exploring the association between a cholecystokinin promoter polymorphism (rs1799923) and posttraumatic stress disorder in combat veterans. J Anxiety Disord. 2015;36:78–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Varga Z, Csabai D, Miseta A, Wiborg O, Czéh B. Chronic stress affects the number of GABAergic neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex of rats. Behav Brain Res. 2017;316:104–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Czéh B, Vardya I, Varga Z, Febbraro F, Csabai D, Martis L‐S, et al. Long‐term stress disrupts the structural and functional integrity of GABAergic neuronal networks in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Casello SM, Flores RJ, Yarur HE, Wang H, Awanyai M, Arenivar MA, et al. Neuropeptide system regulation of prefrontal cortex circuitry: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Neural Circuits. 2022;16:796443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Asim M, Hao B, Yang Y‐H, Fan B‐F, Xue L, Shi Y‐W, et al. Ketamine alleviates fear generalization through GluN2B‐BDNF signaling in mice. Neurosci Bull. 2020;36:153–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Asim M, Wang H, Chen X, He J. Potentiated GABAergic neuronal activities in the basolateral amygdala alleviate stress‐induced depressive behaviors. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023;30:e14422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Asim M, Hao B, Waris A, Liang Y‐M, Wang X‐G. Ketamine attenuates the PTSD‐like effect via regulation of glutamatergic signaling in the nucleus accumbens of mice. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2022;120:103723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Meltzer HY. Role of serotonin in depression. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1990;600:486–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Kapur S, Mann JJ. Role of the dopaminergic system in depression. Biol Psychiatry. 1992;32:1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Ma Y, Giardino WJ. Neural circuit mechanisms of the cholecystokinin (CCK) neuropeptide system in addiction. Addict Neurosci. 2022;3:100024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Kim B, Yoon S, Nakajima R, Lee HJ, Lim HJ, Lee Y‐K, et al. Dopamine D2 receptor‐mediated circuit from the central amygdala to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis regulates impulsive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E10730–E10739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Dorocic IP, Fürth D, Xuan Y, Johansson Y, Pozzi L, Silberberg G, et al. A whole‐brain atlas of inputs to serotonergic neurons of the dorsal and median raphe nuclei. Neuron. 2014;83:663–678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Deschwanden A, Karolewicz B, Feyissa AM, Treyer V, Ametamey SM, Johayem A, et al. Reduced metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 density in major depression determined by [(11)C]ABP688 PET and postmortem study. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:727–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Kovačević T, Skelin I, Minuzzi L, Rosa‐Neto P, Diksic M. Reduced metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the Flinders Sensitive Line of rats, an animal model of depression: an autoradiographic study. Brain Res Bull. 2012;87:406–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Kim J, Kang S, Choi TY, Chang KA, Koo JW. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in amygdala target neurons regulates susceptibility to chronic social stress. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;92:104–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Breukel AI, Wiegant VM, Lopes da Silva FH, Ghijsen WE. Presynaptic modulation of cholecystokinin release by protein kinase C in the rat hippocampus. J Neurochem. 1998;70:341–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Maejima T, Hashimoto K, Yoshida T, Aiba A, Kano M. Presynaptic inhibition caused by retrograde signal from metabotropic glutamate to cannabinoid receptors. Neuron. 2001;31:463–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Kiritoshi T, Sun H, Ren W, Stauffer SR, Lindsley CW, Conn PJ, et al. Modulation of pyramidal cell output in the medial prefrontal cortex by mGluR5 interacting with CB1. Neuropharmacology. 2013;66:170–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Chiarlone A, Bellocchio L, Blázquez C, Resel E, Soria‐Gómez E, Cannich A, et al. A restricted population of CB1 cannabinoid receptors with neuroprotective activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:8257–8262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Ohm T, Müller H, Braak H, Bohl J. Close‐meshed prevalence rates of different stages as a tool to uncover the rate of Alzheimer's disease‐related neurofibrillary changes. Neuroscience. 1995;64:209–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Mattson MP. Pathways towards and away from Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2004;430:631–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Du A, Schuff N, Amend D, Laakso M, Hsu Y, Jagust W, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:441–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Podvin S, Jiang Z, Boyarko B, Rossitto L‐A, O'Donoghue A, Rissman RA, et al. Dysregulation of neuropeptide and tau peptide signatures in human Alzheimer's disease brain. ACS Chem Nerosci. 2022;13:1992–2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Roussarie J‐P, Yao V, Rodriguez‐Rodriguez P, Oughtred R, Rust J, Plautz Z, et al. Selective neuronal vulnerability in Alzheimer's disease: a network‐based analysis. Neuron. 2020;107:821–835.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Plagman A, Hoscheidt S, McLimans KE, Klinedinst B, Pappas C, Anantharam V, et al. Cholecystokinin and Alzheimer's disease: a biomarker of metabolic function, neural integrity, and cognitive performance. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;76:201–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Jacobsen JS, Wu C‐C, Redwine JM, Comery TA, Arias R, Bowlby M, et al. Early‐onset behavioral and synaptic deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:5161–5166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Chen C, Ma X, Wei J, Shakir N, Zhang JK, Zhang L, et al. Early impairment of cortical circuit plasticity and connectivity in the 5XFAD Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12:371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Phillips PE, Stuber GD, Heien ML, Wightman RM, Carelli RM. Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking. Nature. 2003;422:614–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Nutt DJ, Lingford‐Hughes A, Erritzoe D, Stokes PR. The dopamine theory of addiction: 40 years of highs and lows. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:305–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Vaccarino FJ. Nucleus accumbens dopamine‐CCK interactions in psychostimulant reward and related behaviors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1994;18:207–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Martin TA, Jayanthi S, McCoy MT, Brannock C, Ladenheim B, Garrett T, et al. Methamphetamine causes differential alterations in gene expression and patterns of histone acetylation/hypoacetylation in the rat nucleus accumbens. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Feifel D, Shilling PD, Kuczenski R, Segal DS. Altered extracellular dopamine concentration in the brains of cholecystokinin—a receptor deficient rats. Neurosci Lett. 2003;348:147–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Loonam TM, Noailles PA, Yu J, Zhu JP, Angulo JA. Substance P and cholecystokinin regulate neurochemical responses to cocaine and methamphetamine in the striatum. Life Sci. 2003;73:727–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Giardino WJ, Pomrenze MB. Extended amygdala neuropeptide circuitry of emotional arousal: waking up on the wrong side of the bed nuclei of stria terminalis. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021;15:613025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Fong G, Mak W, Cheng T, Chan K, Fong J, Ho S. A prevalence study of epilepsy in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2003;9:252–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Song P, Liu Y, Yu X, Wu J, Poon AN, Demaio A, et al. Prevalence of epilepsy in China between 1990 and 2015: a systematic review and meta—analysis. J Glob Health. 2017;7:020706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Bello ST, Xu S, Li X, Ren J, Jendrichovsky P, Jiang F, et al. Visually or auditorily induced seizures involve the activation of nonhippocampal brain areas and hippocampal removal does not alleviate seizures in a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2023;65:218–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Iadarola MJ, Sherwin AL. Alterations in cholecystokinin peptide and mRNA in actively epileptic human temporal cortical foci. Epilepsy Res. 1991;8:58–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Gruber B, Greber S, Sperk G. Kainic acid seizures cause enhanced expression of cholecystokinin‐octapeptide in the cortex and hippocampus of the rat. Synapse. 1993;15:221–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Zhang L‐X, Smith MA, Kim S‐Y, Rosen JB, Weiss SR, Post RM. Changes in cholecystokinin mRNA expression after amygdala kindled seizures: an in situ hybridization study. Mol Brain Res. 1996;35:278–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Wyeth MS, Zhang N, Houser CR. Increased cholecystokinin labeling in the hippocampus of a mouse model of epilepsy maps to spines and glutamatergic terminals. Neuroscience. 2012;202:371–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Zetler G. Anticonvulsant effects of caerulein, cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK‐8) and diazepam against seizures produced in mice by harman, thiosemicarbazide and isoniazid. Neurosci Lett. 1981;24:175–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Kádár T, Penke B, Pesti A, Telegdy G. Multiple treatment potentiates the anticonvulsive activity of cholecystokinin octapeptides. Peptides. 1985;6:1009–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Mizuseki K, Sirota A, Pastalkova E, Buzsáki G. Theta oscillations provide temporal windows for local circuit computation in the entorhinal‐hippocampal loop. Neuron. 2009;64:267–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Karlsgodt KH, Sun D, Cannon TD. Structural and functional brain abnormalities in schizophrenia. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19:226–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Kesby J, Eyles D, McGrath J, Scott J. Dopamine, psychosis and schizophrenia: the widening gap between basic and clinical neuroscience. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Luvsannyam E, Jain MS, Pormento MKL, Siddiqui H, Balagtas ARA, Emuze BO, et al. Neurobiology of schizophrenia: a comprehensive review. Cureus. 2022;14:e23959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Dudok B, Barna L, Ledri M, Szabó SI, Szabadits E, Pintér B, et al. Cell‐specific STORM super‐resolution imaging reveals nanoscale organization of cannabinoid signaling. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:75–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Fung SJ, Fillman SG, Webster MJ, Weickert CS. Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder show both common and distinct changes in cortical interneuron markers. Schizophr Res. 2014;155:26–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Marsman A, Mandl RC, Klomp DW, Bohlken MM, Boer VO, Andreychenko A, et al. GABA and glutamate in schizophrenia: a 7 T 1H‐MRS study. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;6:398–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Rout JK, Dasgupta A, Singh O, Banerjee U, Basu A. Association of single‐nucleotide polymorphism of cholecystokinin receptor A gene with schizophrenia in an Eastern Indian population. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57:267–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Sanjuan J, Toirac I, Gonzalez J, Leal C, Molto M, Najera C, et al. A possible association between the CCK‐AR gene and persistent auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. 2004;19:349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Ocklenburg S, Arning L, Gerding WM, Epplen JT, Güntürkün O, Beste C. Cholecystokinin A receptor (CCKAR) gene variation is associated with language lateralization. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Takimoto T, Terayama H, Waga C, Okayama T, Ikeda K, Fukunishi I, et al. Cholecystokinin (CCK) and the CCKA receptor gene polymorphism, and smoking behavior. Psychiatry Res. 2005;133:123–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Goldman JG, Goetz CG, Berry‐Kravis E, Leurgans S, Zhou L. Genetic polymorphisms in Parkinson disease subjects with and without hallucinations: an analysis of the cholecystokinin system. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1280–1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biofactors (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES