Skip to main content
Endocrinology logoLink to Endocrinology
. 2024 Nov 21;166(1):bqae155. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqae155

Physiology and Pharmacology of Effects of GLP-1-based Therapies on Gastric, Biliary and Intestinal Motility

Ryan J Jalleh 1,2, Chinmay S Marathe 3,4, Christopher K Rayner 5,6, Karen L Jones 7,8, Mahesh M Umapathysivam 9,10,11, Tongzhi Wu 12, Daniel R Quast 13, Mark P Plummer 14,15, Michael A Nauck 16,17, Michael Horowitz 18,19,
PMCID: PMC11630531  PMID: 39568409

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and the dual GLP-1- and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor co-agonist tirzepatide (referred to here collectively as “GLP-1-based therapy”) are incretin-based therapies being used increasingly in the management of both type 2 diabetes and obesity. They are now recognized to have beneficial effects beyond improved glycemic control and weight loss, including cardiovascular and renal protection. GLP-1-based therapy also slows gastric emptying, which has benefits (lowering postprandial glucose), but also potential risks (eg, hypoglycemia in individuals on insulin or sulphonylurea therapy). Their effects on the gallbladder may also be beneficial, contributing to reducing postprandial triglycerides, but they also potentially increase the risk of biliary disease. In this review, we summarize the effects of GLP-1 and incretin-based therapeutics on gastric, biliary and small intestinal function. An improved understanding of these effects will optimize the use of these drugs.

Keywords: biliary, gastric emptying, glucagon-like peptide-1, hypoglycemia, physiology, small intestinal motility


The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies, including GLP-1 receptor agonists (RAs) and tirzepatide, is increasing, based on their benefits for cardiovascular and renal health, in addition to their well-established capacity to improve glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (1, 2) and induce weight loss (3). More recently, clinical trials involving drugs that combine GLP-1 receptor agonism with agonism or antagonism of other receptors, such as those for GIP or glucagon, have shown considerable promise in the management of T2D (4) and obesity (5) (eg, the triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon RA, retatrutide). Small molecule oral GLP-1RAs in development, like orforglipron, also provide for easier administration (6). An understanding of the effects of GLP-1-based therapy on gastrointestinal function, which are integral to many of their benefits, as well as their adverse effects, is important. Potential harms associated with GLP-1-based therapies to slow gastric emptying have recently received considerable attention, including in mainstream media (7). A recent review by Drucker (8) provides a broad-based review on the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs, including potential novel therapeutic applications. Our review is focused on current knowledge of the effects of GLP-1-based therapies on gastric emptying, biliary/intestinal motility, and the implications for their clinical use.

Physiology of Gastric Emptying

Gastroduodenal motility is modulated by the interstitial cells of Cajal and fibroblast-like cells that stain positively for platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (9). These pacemaker cells are electrically coupled to the smooth muscle cells of the stomach by gap junctions to regulate motor activity (9). Patterns of contractile activity in the proximal stomach, antrum, and pylorus differ between the interdigestive (fasting) and the postprandial states (10). The interdigestive state, characterized by cyclical gastric and small intestinal motility—the “migrating motor complex”—has 4 phases (11). During phase I, there is motor quiescence lasting for ∼40 minutes and this is followed by phase II, associated with intermittent contractions of ∼50 minutes’ duration (10). Phase III, which lasts 5 to 10 minutes, is characterized by large amplitude regular contractions, during which larger nondigestible solids (including tablets/capsules that are not broken down) are expelled from the stomach and the upper small intestine (10). Phase IV is a short quiescent transition period (11). The migrating motor complex is converted to a postprandial pattern by the arrival of food in the stomach. The latter is characterized by a reduction in proximal gastric tone to accommodate the meal, whereas antral contractions grind digestible solid contents against a closed pylorus until they are reduced to particles 1 to 2 mm in size before emptying from the stomach (10).

In health, digestible solids and nutrient-containing liquids empty more slowly than nonnutrient liquids. There is a large interindividual (but much lesser intraindividual) variation in gastric emptying of nutrients, with the rate dependent on the caloric content of ingested food, ranging from 1 to 4 kcal per minute (12). This variability is even greater in obesity and both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D (13). In obese individuals without T2D, and those with recently diagnosed with well-controlled T2D, gastric emptying is usually either normal or modestly accelerated (14-16), whereas in longstanding and complicated T2D and T1D, it is delayed in ∼30% of individuals (13). There are also sex and ethnic differences in the rate of gastric emptying with emptying being slower in women with T2D compared to men (17) and in Whites compared to Han Chinese (18).

The Impact of Gastric Emptying on Postprandial Glycemia and Energy Intake

The relationships between gastric emptying, postprandial glycemic excursions, and energy intake are complex and impacted by glucose tolerance status. In individuals with normal glucose tolerance, the rise in plasma glucose during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test at 30 minutes, but not 60 minutes, is related directly to the rate of gastric emptying, so that the rise is greater when gastric emptying is relatively more rapid. In contrast, at 120 minutes, the relationship is inverse (ie, the blood glucose level is lower when gastric emptying is faster), probably reflecting the antecedent higher levels of insulin that subsequently lower blood glucose (19). In contrast, in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance but not diabetes, the rise in plasma glucose at both 30 and 60 minutes, but not 120 minutes, is related directly to the rate of gastric emptying, whereas in individuals with T2D, plasma glucose levels at 30, 60, and 120 minutes are all related directly to the rate of gastric emptying (19, 20). This progressive “shift to the right” is likely to reflect the concomitant progressive impairment in insulin secretion and sensitivity. Relationships between the rise in plasma glucose following nutrients and gastric emptying have also been shown with carbohydrate-containing meals. For example, in individuals with T2D, the incremental rises in glucose (measured by a continuous glucose sensor) between 0 to 30 minutes, 0 to 60 minutes, and 0 to 120 minutes following carbohydrate-containing meals is greater when gastric emptying is more rapid (21). Accordingly, gastric emptying is unequivocally a major determinant of the postprandial glucose excursion in both health and diabetes, accounting for ∼35% of the variance in the initial rise (22). Relatively more rapid gastric emptying, by definition, leads to the delivery of nutrients to the small intestine at a greater velocity, where they stimulate the secretion of hormones that may suppress appetite, including GLP-1, peptide YY (PYY), cholecystokinin (CCK), and oxyntomodulin (23) (Fig. 1). Both GLP-1 and PYY, which are co-secreted from intestinal L cells (predominantly located in the distal small intestine), slow gastric emptying, constituting a negative feedback mechanism called the “ileal brake” (24). It should be appreciated that gastric emptying is slowed by acute elevations in blood glucose induced by hyperglycemic clamps (25), although there is evidence that the effect of spontaneous elevations in glucose may be less (15, 26). This is an issue which requires further clarification, particularly given its potential relevance to evaluation of the effect of GLP-1RAs on gastric emptying in diabetes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Factors that slow or accelerate gastric emptying.

Satiety and satiation are both important determinants of energy intake and related to gastric emptying. “Satiation” refers to the sensation of fullness during a meal that brings a period of eating to an end (27), whereas “satiety” refers to the period following a meal when hunger and further eating are inhibited (27). In healthy individuals, slower gastric emptying is associated with reduced energy intake at an ad libitum buffet meal (ie, increased satiation) (28). This relationship may reflect the effect of more sustained stimulation of mechanoreceptors in the stomach by gastric distension, to suppress appetite-regulating centers in the brain via vagal afferents (29). The intragastric distribution of food is an important determinant of energy intake, in that distension of the gastric antrum is associated with the sensation of fullness and predictive of subsequent energy intake at a meal (30), although distension of the proximal stomach may also be important (31). In summary, the rate of gastric emptying is directly associated with postprandial glycemia and inversely with energy intake.

Methods for Measuring Gastric Emptying

When evaluating the effects of GLP-1RAs (or any other drug) on gastric emptying, accurate measurement is essential. Several techniques can measure gastric emptying precisely, but the majority of studies relating to GLP-1RAs have, unfortunately, employed suboptimal methodology. A summary of techniques frequently used to measure gastric emptying is presented (Fig. 2). Scintigraphy, a noninvasive technique (32), in which a gamma camera is used to measure emptying of radiolabeled food, remains the “gold standard” (13) and has a number of advantages. It provides a direct measure of gastric emptying and, by using 2 isotopes, allows for concurrent measurement of emptying of both solids and liquids (33). By drawing “regions of interest” to identify the proximal and distal stomach, scintigraphy also allows assessment of intragastric meal distribution (34, 35). Inherent limitations include the high cost, limited availability, and exposure to ionizing radiation. For example, the latter precludes studies during pregnancy.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Techniques frequently used to measure gastric emptying.

The stable isotope breath test (36) is increasingly used in both clinical practice and research. Unlike scintigraphy, the test is not associated with a radiation burden. It is also noninvasive, simple, and readily available. Validation against the “gold standard” of scintigraphy has demonstrated strong correlations for measurements of solid and liquid emptying between the 2 techniques in both health (37, 38) and diabetes (39). With this method, a test meal is labeled with a 13C-substrate that is rapidly absorbed in the duodenum after leaving the stomach, oxidized in the liver and exhaled as 13CO2, which is collected via serial breath samples and measured using mass spectrometry. Gastric emptying is the rate-limiting step in the appearance of 13CO2 in the breath, and is estimated by the percentage of 13CO2 collected over time, utilizing a mathematical model. The original analytical models provided notional measurements of gastric half-emptying time (36), but more recent use of the Wagner-Nelson method, a pharmacokinetic model employing an elimination constant, provides precise measurements, comparable to scintigraphy (39). Limitations of the breath test include the assumption that the times required for small intestinal absorption and hepatic metabolism of isotope are negligible (ie, effects of gastric emptying and small intestinal motility cannot be discriminated), and that it is an indirect measure of gastric emptying (40).

Two-dimensional and 3D ultrasound techniques have been validated against scintigraphy (41-43). Ultrasound offers several advantages: it is noninvasive, not associated with a radiation burden, easy to perform with experience, usually provides images with high temporal and spatial resolution, and is readily available. With 3D ultrasound, intragastric meal distribution can also be evaluated. Limitations include the requirement for an experienced operator, the indirect inference of gastric emptying from changes in antral area or intragastric volume, and the challenge of imaging individuals with obesity or extensive intragastric gas. Neither the 2-dimensional or 3D technique is able to measure emptying of solids and liquids concurrently.

The acetaminophen (paracetamol) technique continues to be used frequently because of its simplicity and low cost. However, this technique has major limitations and we believe it should be avoided, particularly in isolation (44, 45). Acetaminophen is added to a test meal (usually a drink) and as the meal empties from the stomach, acetaminophen is absorbed in the proximal small intestine and concentrations can then be measured in plasma (or saliva). The acetaminophen technique can only measure gastric emptying of liquids and is reliant on the assumption that the acetaminophen is rapidly absorbed in the duodenum (45). The use of the acetaminophen technique has provided misleading information relating to the effects of GLP-1RAs on gastric emptying, as shown by subsequent studies with scintigraphy; in some cases, the outcome of the acetaminophen test has been interpreted incorrectly (46-48). A recent review by Hiramoto et al (49). suggested that the magnitude of the delay in gastric emptying by GLP-1RAs is modest and had no effect to slow gastric emptying of liquids. However, this conclusion is based upon the use of the acetaminophen absorption technique and is, most likely, erroneous. For example, when measured using scintigraphy, the GLP-1RA lixisenatide was shown to markedly delay liquid emptying (50).

Effect of Exogenous GLP-1, GLP-2, GIP, and Blockade of Endogenous GLP-1 on Gastric Emptying

Slowing of gastric emptying by infusions of exogenous native GLP-1, in pharmacological and modestly supraphysiological doses, has been observed in both healthy individuals and those with T2D (51-53), and the magnitude of slowing appears comparable in the 2 groups. In contrast, GIP has minimal, if any, effect on gastric emptying (54). GLP-1 receptors are present in the myenteric plexus (55) and are coupled to the G-protein G subunit. Agonist binding leads to adenylyl cyclase activation with consequent production of cAMP and inhibition of vagal activity (55). Consistent with the observation that exogenous GLP-1 slows gastric emptying, exendin 9-39 (a GLP-1 receptor antagonist) has been shown to increase antroduodenal contractility and reduce pyloric tone (56) to accelerate gastric emptying in health (57). This indicates that GLP-1 is a physiological modulator to slow the rate of gastric emptying, particularly as the acceleration of gastric emptying by exendin 9-39 occurs despite a concomitant increase in PYY secretion (58), which slows emptying (59). The slowing of gastric emptying induced by exogenous GLP-1 is greater when the baseline rate of gastric emptying is relatively more rapid (60) and in patients with critical illness, exogenous GLP-1 has been reported to not slow gastric emptying further when it is already delayed (60). In health, with sustained administration of GLP-1 (eg, continuous intravenous infusion for 24 hours), the slowing of gastric emptying by GLP-1, while still significant, is less marked (61). This provides evidence of tachyphylaxis to the slowing effect of GLP-1 even after only 4 to 24 hours of continuous exposure.

In addition to the postprandial effect to slow gastric emptying, exogenous GLP-1 in pharmacological doses may affect fasting motility to reduce phase III activity in the antroduodenojejunal region (62). This effect, observed in both animals (63) and humans (62), would be anticipated to increase the retention of larger nondigestible solids in the stomach. No studies are available regarding similar effects of GLP-1-based medications, nor is it known whether there may be tachyphylaxis to this effect.

Dipeptidyl-dipeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors block the breakdown of GLP-1 and GIP to improve insulin sensitivity and glycemic control. DPP-4 inhibitors, however, do not have a significant effect on gastric emptying (64) but also attenuate the postprandial PYY response by preventing the activation going from PYY1-36 (biologically inactive) to PYY3-36 (biologically active) (65). Because PYY3-36 slows gastric emptying, attenuation of the PYY response may counteract the effect of the increase in circulating GLP-1 to slow gastric emptying to explain why DPP-4 inhibitors have no effect on gastric emptying.

GLP-2 is co-secreted with GLP-1 following the exposure of the small intestine to nutrients. The primary function of GLP-2 is to regulate intestinal growth; however, there has predictably been interest in the effect of GLP-2 on gastric emptying. No effect of GLP-2 on gastric emptying was evident in studies using scintigraphy (66) and the stable isotope breath test (67). However, in an ultrasound study, GLP-2 was reported to slow gastric emptying modestly but to a much lesser extent than GLP-1 (68).

Evidence for Slowed Gastric Emptying in Clinical Studies With GLP-1RAs and Tirzepatide

Numerous clinical studies have evaluated the effects of GLP-1RAs, as well as the dual GIP/GLP-1 RA tirzepatide, on gastric emptying as a primary or secondary endpoint in subjects with T2D and those with obesity but without diabetes (69). In such studies, particularly in T2D, a potential confounder is the concomitant reduction in blood glucose, which may affect gastric emptying independently (25). Exendin-4, the precursor to exenatide (the first GLP-1RA), lowered postprandial glucose levels in health (70).

Short-acting GLP-1RAs studied in people with T2D include exenatide BD (71, 72) and lixisenatide (73-76), with treatment durations spanning 5 days to 14 weeks. In these studies, gastric half-emptying times of liquids and/or solids were shown to be variably increased up to 3.4-fold, compared to placebo (71). Furthermore, marked slowing of gastric emptying may occur in doses substantially less than those used for glucose lowering in T2D (71) to slow emptying of both nutrient liquids and solids (50). For example, in 15 individuals with T2D, the intragastric retention of a 75-g oral glucose drink (measured using scintigraphy) was much greater with individuals treated with 20 µg lixisenatide when compared to placebo at both 120 and 240 minutes (50) (Fig. 3). As is the case with native GLP-1, the slowing of gastric emptying induced by both exenatide BD and lixisenatide is greater when the baseline rate of gastric emptying is relatively faster and is predictive of the reduction in postprandial glucose (71, 77).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Intragastric retention of a 300-mL drink containing 75-g glucose at (A) 120 minutes and (B) 240 minutes after ingestion in 30 participants with T2D after 8 weeks treatment with either lixisenatide 20 µg (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15). Median values are indicated. Lixisenatide substantially slows gastric emptying of liquids at 120 minutes and 240 minutes. Reproduced from Kovoor et al (50). © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

In the majority of studies (Table 1), there was a reduction in energy intake with both short- and long-acting GLP-1RAs. However, there does not appear to be a relationship between the magnitude of the decrease in energy intake and the delay in gastric emptying (35, 82).

Table 1.

Effect of GLP-1RAs on energy intake and its relationship to gastric emptying

Target population/study (first author, year) Compound/preparation Final dose(s) Duration Comparison Outcome of GLP-1RA treatment on energy intake (⇓ decreased, ⇔ no change) Comments
Type 2 diabetes
Bae et al (78) Lixisenatide (n = 29) 10 µg SC daily Acute Saline (n = 29)
Flint et al (79) Liraglutide (n = 18) 1.8 mg SC daily 3 weeks Placebo (n = 18) (details not specified)
Gibbons et al (80) Semaglutide (n = 13) 14 mg Oral daily 12 weeks Placebo (n = 13)
Horowitz et al (81) Liraglutide (n = 46) 1.8 mg SC daily 4 weeks Placebo (n = 46) Acetaminophen concentration AUC0-60 minutes and C(max) were less with liraglutide vs placebo
Jalleh et al (35) Lixisenatide
(Health n = 15)
(T2D n = 15)
10 µg SC daily Acute Placebo (n = 30) Lixisenatide delayed gastric emptying (scintigraphy) but the reduction in energy intake by lixisenatide was unrelated to changes in gastric emptying or intragastric distribution
Quast et al (82) Lixisenatide (n = 24)
Liraglutide (n = 26)
20 µg SC daily
1.8 mg SC daily
10 weeks Lixisenatide vs liraglutide Both lixisenatide and liraglutide reduced energy intake comparably. Weight loss and appetite reduction were not related to the delay in gastric emptying (isotope breath test) or gastrointestinal adverse effects
Valenzuela-Vellejo et al (83) Liraglutide (n = 20) 1.8 mg SC daily 17 days Placebo (n = 20)
Obesity
Acosta et al (84) Exenatide (n = 10) 5 µg SC BID 30 days Placebo (n = 10)
Basolo et al (85) Exenatide (n = 40) 10 µg SC BID 24 weeks Placebo (n = 39)
Blundell et al (86) Semaglutide (n = 30) 1 mg SC weekly 12 weeks Placebo (n = 30)
Gabe et al (87) Semaglutide (n = 30) 50 mg oral daily 20 weeks Placebo (n = 31) No difference in time to Cmax, AUC0-5h, or AUC0-1h for paracetamol concentrations. Relationship between acetaminophen concentration and energy intake was not analyzed
Friedrichsen et al (88) Semaglutide (n = 36) 2.4 mg SC weekly 20 weeks Placebo (n = 36) No difference in time to maximum acetaminophen concentration. Relationship between acetaminophen concentration and energy intake was not analyzed
Schlögl et al (89) Exenatide (n = 24) 0.12 pmol/kg/min IV Acute Placebo (n = 24)
Shoemaker et al (90) Exenatide (n = 23) 2 mg SC weekly 36 weeks Placebo (n = 19) Hypothalamic obesity with suprasellar tumors
Silver et al (91) Liraglutide (n = 44) 1.8 mg SC daily 14 weeks Sitagliptin (n = 22)
Caloric restriction (n = 22)
Obesity with prediabetes
van Can et al (92) Liraglutide (n = 30) 1.8 mg SC daily 5 weeks Placebo (n = 30)
Type 1 diabetes
Dubé et al (93) Liraglutide (n = 15) 1.8 mg SC daily 24 weeks Placebo (n = 15)

Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; SC, subcutaneous; T2D, type 2 diabetes.

Potential Impact of Slower Gastric Emptying Induced by GLP-1RAs—Risk of Hypoglycemia

In individuals with insulin-treated diabetes, the postprandial insulin dose is often based on the amount of carbohydrate consumed, the “insulin: carbohydrate ratio.” A limitation of this approach is that it does not take into account the gastrointestinal contribution to postprandial glycemia, particularly gastric emptying. Because gastric emptying is not routinely measured, information about its rate in a specific individual is not usually available to the treating clinician. This is despite compelling evidence that modulating gastric emptying may have a major impact on postprandial glycemia. For example, in T2D, when gastric emptying is slowed using a drug (such as morphine), or by dietary modifications such as a “preload” (a small nutrient load such as olive oil or whey protein taken ∼15 minutes before the meal), the glycemic excursion is substantially less (42, 94, 95). Abnormally delayed gastric emptying, sometimes associated with clinical symptoms (ie, “diabetic gastroparesis”), occurs in ∼30% of people with longstanding, suboptimally controlled, insulin-treated diabetes. Gastrointestinal autonomic neuropathy is, at least in part, responsible for the impairment in gastric emptying, which increases the propensity for a mismatch between onset of action of subcutaneously administered prandial insulin and the absorption of ingested carbohydrates from the small intestine. In an early study, Ishii et al (96) found that the insulin requirement to maintain euglycemia postprandially was less in insulin-treated people with gastroparesis than those without gastroparesis during the first 120 minutes following a mixed meal containing 60 g carbohydrate but was greater between 180 and 240 minutes. The implication is that delayed gastric emptying reduces the initial insulin requirement following a meal (96), and when markedly delayed, it may increase the propensity for insulin-induced hypoglycemia. This concept is supported by a study by Lysy et al (97), who reported that gastric emptying (measured using a stable isotope breath test) was frequently delayed in people with insulin-treated diabetes and “unexplained” (usually postprandial) hypoglycemia. We have proposed the term “gastric hypoglycemia” to describe this phenomenon (98).

Gastric “Counterregulation” of Hypoglycemia—Impact of GLP-1RAs

Acute hypoglycemia is the most feared adverse event in people treated with insulin or sulfonylureas (99). The stomach plays a key, but often overlooked, role in the counterregulation of insulin-induced hypoglycemia because of a marked acceleration of gastric emptying, which increases the rate of carbohydrate absorption (100). The earliest evidence to support its importance was reported as early as 1924 in dogs by Bachrach (100), barely 3 years after the discovery of insulin.

The activity of the stomach during hypoglycemia suggests an adaptation reaction in that it prepares the organism for rapid digestion of food, the ingestion of which is imperative to restore the lowered blood sugar. Bachrach, 1953 (101)

Insulin-induced hypoglycemia accelerates gastric emptying substantially, even in individuals with gastroparesis and autonomic neuropathy (102, 103). Antecedent hypoglycemia (blood glucose 2.8 mmol/L) does not appear to attenuate the acceleration of gastric emptying by subsequent insulin-induced hypoglycemia in health (104). The magnitude of acceleration of gastric emptying is dependent on the degree of hypoglycemia (ie, in health), the acceleration of gastric emptying is greater when the blood glucose is clamped at 2.6 mmol/L than 3.6 mmol/L (103).

The risk of hypoglycemia with GLP-1RA monotherapy is predictably very low or even nonexistent because the insulinotropic actions are highly glucose-dependent (105-107). In contrast, clinical trials and real-world studies are indicative of a slightly increased risk of hypoglycemia when GLP-1RAs are combined with insulin or sulfonylureas (108, 109). Accordingly, it is of interest that the acceleration of gastric emptying induced by hypoglycemia is attenuated by administration of native GLP-1 (110) and the short-acting GLP-1RA, exenatide (111), which may well increase the potential for a mismatch between nutrient delivery after meal ingestion and insulin action in people co-prescribed a GLP-1RA and insulin, thus predisposing to hypoglycemia. This issue warrants further evaluation. Furthermore, novel incretin-based therapies under evaluation stimulate not only receptors for GLP-1 but also glucagon (4) and amylin (112), both known to delay gastric emptying.

Duration of Slowing of Gastric Emptying by GLP-1RAs

In studies evaluating the effects of long-acting GLP-1RAs on gastric emptying in T2D, liraglutide (72-74, 81, 113-115), efpeglenatide (115), and oral semaglutide (47) have been examined over treatment durations of up to 3 months (115). In these studies, gastric emptying appears to be less markedly slowed than with short-acting GLP-1RAs, with a maximum increase in the mean gastric half-emptying time of ∼1.6-fold (116). However, the methodology used to quantify gastric emptying (eg, acetaminophen absorption) in many cases was suboptimal. In line with these findings, the dual GIP/GLP-1 RA, tirzepatide, was found to delay gastric emptying in T2D, with evidence that this effect may be diminished after 23 days of treatment (ie, suggestive of tachyphylaxis) (Table 2) (117).

Table 2.

Effects of GLP-1RAs and combination medication on gastric, small intestinal, and gallbladder motility

GLP-1 based medication Effect on gastric emptying Effect on small intestinal motility Effect on gallbladder emptying
Short-acting GLP-1RA
 Exenatide BID (84, 118, 119) ⇓⇓
 Lixisenatide (77, 120) ⇓⇓
(Case reports)
Long-acting GLP-1RA
 Liraglutide (73, 121, 122)
 Dulaglutide (123, 124)
(Case reports)
Not studied
 Albiglutide (125, 126) Not studied
(Case reports)
 Semaglutide SC (46, 126)
(Case reports)
Not studied
 Semaglutide PO (47, 87) ⇓/⇔ Not studied Not studied
Combined GLP-1-based medication
 Tirzepatide (GLP-1/GIP co-agonist) (117, 127)
(Case reports)
Not studied
 Retatrutide (GLP-1/GIP/glucagon co-agonist) (117)
(Animal study)
Not studied Not studied

In individuals with obesity but not T2D, only long-acting GLP-1RAs have been evaluated. These studies used liraglutide (128, 129), once-weekly exenatide (130), and oral/subcutaneous semaglutide (46, 87, 88, 131) with treatment durations of up to 20 weeks (88). Although a delay in gastric emptying has been reported in studies of shorter treatment durations (8-16 weeks), there was no effect on gastric emptying with high-dose semaglutide (2.4 mg per week) or oral semaglutide (50 mg daily) in 2 studies evaluating the longest treatment duration (20 weeks). These observations should, however, be viewed circumspectly because the acetaminophen technique was used (88). A study by Maselli et al using scintigraphy indicated a persisting marked delay in gastric emptying after 16 weeks of liraglutide therapy (3 mg per day), albeit less than the delay at 5 weeks (129). However, this study also confirmed the expected substantial interindividual differences in the magnitude of the delay in gastric emptying induced by GLP-1RAs (116). As with studies in T2D, the slowing of gastric emptying by liraglutide was greater when the rate of gastric emptying at baseline was more rapid and was predictive of weight loss (129).

In summary, short- and long-acting GLP-1RAs slow gastric emptying in individuals with T2D, or obesity without T2D, an effect integral to postprandial glucose lowering and, potentially, weight loss. Slowing of gastric emptying is variable, depends on the baseline rate of gastric emptying, and with long-acting GLP-1RAs, may diminish with sustained administration. Prospective studies of the effects of long-acting GLP-1RAs on gastric emptying using sensitive methodology are required to clarify this important issue.

Effects of GLP-1RAs on the Gallbladder and Biliary Tract

Since the introduction of GLP-1RAs, there have been reports of gallbladder disorders associated with their use (132, 133). Whether this represents a class-effect is difficult to determine, given that both T2D and rapid weight loss independently increase the risk of gallstone-related pathology (134, 135). In a meta-analysis of 10 prospective studies including more than 220 000 cases, the relative risk for individuals with diabetes (T1D or T2D) having gallstones, a cholecystectomy, or cholecystitis was 1.56 (95% CI, 1.26-1.93) compared to individuals without diabetes (134). Prescribing information for GLP-1RAs was amended in 2022 to include warnings regarding the potential for gallbladder and biliary disease (136), following the publication of a systematic review and meta-analysis by He et al of 76 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of GLP-1RAs with placebo or a non-GLP-1RA glucose-lowering drug in more than 100 000 individuals (137). Randomization to GLP-1RA treatment was found to be associated with increased risks of cholelithiasis (relative risk [RR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.47), cholecystitis (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14-1.62) and biliary disease (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.08-2.22) (137). An increased risk of GLP-1RA-associated gallbladder disorders was only evident with higher doses and longer durations of treatment (>26 weeks), and this risk was greatest when GLP-1RAs were prescribed for weight loss (137). However, an increased risk of gallbladder or biliary disease was not evident with all GLP-1RAs: liraglutide and dulaglutide were associated with an increased risk and point estimates favored an increased risk with exenatide and subcutaneous semaglutide that was not statistically significant. There was, however, no evidence of increased risk with either lixisenatide, albiglutide, or oral semaglutide. Previously, only 12 trials have reported biliary tract cancer as an outcome and in all cases, the durations of follow-up were short. The overall incidence was, however, low (<1/1000) and there was no suggestion of an increased risk associated with GLP-RA use (137).

Several small trials have provided insights into the effects of supraphysiological/pharmacological concentrations of GLP-1 on gallbladder motor function which provide a mechanistic rationale for GLP-1RA-associated harm. For example, in healthy volunteers, Keller et al reported that a single subcutaneous dose of short-acting exenatide (10 µg) reduced CCK-induced gallbladder contractility in the fasted state by ∼30% (118). Utilizing similar study designs in healthy volunteers, gallbladder emptying induced by IV CCK was shown to be attenuated by single subcutaneous doses of albiglutide 50 mg (125) and lixisenatide 20 µg (120). In a crossover study of 10 healthy volunteers and 10 participants with T1D, Rehfeld et al reported that an intravenous infusion of GLP-1, at a pharmacological dose, suppressed meal-induced release of CCK and attenuated meal-induced gallbladder contractility substantially (138). Accordingly, these short-term studies in healthy individuals indicate that GLP-1-based therapy has the potential to attenuate both the CCK response to meals and the responsiveness of the gallbladder to CCK, although the underlying mechanism of this remains unknown (Fig. 4). Limitations include a lack of studies in obese or T2D patients or with prolonged use of a GLP-1RA. Nevertheless, given that impaired gallbladder contraction is known to predispose to sludge and gallstone formation, it is reasonable to suggest that long-term use of GLP-1RAs could predispose to gallbladder and biliary disease (138).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Mechanisms for the effect of GLP-1/GLP-1RA on gallbladder and gastrointestinal motility.

A signal for harm has not been evident in trials of long-term GLP-1RA use in target populations. For example, in a randomized placebo-controlled trial in 60 patients with T2D, Smits et al investigated the effects of 12 weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide (1.8 mg/day) and concluded it had no effect on either fasting gallbladder volume or gallbladder emptying (139), whereas in a randomized placebo-controlled trial in 52 obese patients, a higher daily dose of liraglutide (3 mg) for 8 weeks had no effect on maximum gallbladder contraction, but delayed the time to full contraction and delayed refilling (121). The inconsistency in the observed biliary effects of liraglutide in these studies may, in part, reflect the different doses used.

However, there are also potential beneficial effects of the inhibition of gallbladder emptying. It may reduce the availability of bile in the small intestine for emulsification and digestion of dietary lipids and, therefore, reduce the postprandial rise in lipids as detailed in the following section.

In summary, observational data from large randomized controlled trials is indicative of a modestly increased incidence of gallbladder disease with GLP-1RA use. Although studies quantifying the acute effects of GLP-1RAs on gallbladder motility have demonstrated attenuation of contractility by GLP-1RA, this has not been clearly shown with longer term use in target populations, particular at lower doses.

GLP-1RAs and Postprandial Triglycerides and ApoB-48

In rats, GLP-1 inhibits lymph flow and triglyceride and ApoB-48 concentrations in lymphatic fluid following an intestinal lipid load (140), supporting a direct effect of GLP-1 signaling to regulate intestinal chylomicron formation. Consistent with this concept, even DPP-4 inhibitors, which increase active GLP-1 concentrations modestly but have no effect on gastrointestinal motility, may reduce postprandial triglyceride and ApoB48 levels substantially (141, 142). The reduction in the postprandial rises in triglycerides and plasma nonesterified fatty acid levels by IV GLP-1 may also relate to slowing of gastric emptying (143).

All GLP-1RAs (144), as well as the GLP-1/GIP dual RA, tirzepatide (145), reduce postprandial triglyceride and ApoB-48 levels significantly, which may be relevant to their cardiovascular benefits. Slowing of gastric emptying and small intestinal transit may reduce the delivery of dietary lipids for subsequent synthesis of chylomicrons in enterocytes.

Effects of GLP-1 and GLP-1RAs on Intestinal Motility

Constipation and diarrhea are well-recognized adverse effects of GLP-1RAs (146). The physiological effect of GLP-1 on small intestinal motility is inhibitory, consistent with a contribution to the “ileal brake,” the phenomenon by which the presence of nutrients in the distal small intestine induces negative feedback on the stomach and proximal small intestine (147) to slow gastrointestinal transit. In healthy humans, IV infusion of the GLP-1RA, exendin 9-39, has been reported to increase duodenal motility during small intestinal nutrient infusion (148). In contrast, IV infusions of native GLP-1, resulting in physiological or supraphysiological plasma GLP-1 concentrations, inhibits phase III of the migrating motor complex in the antroduodenaljejunal region (62) and suppresses duodenal pressure waves both during fasting and following intraduodenal lipid infusion (149). Similarly, acute administration of GLP-1RAs (subcutaneous liraglutide and IV exenatide) inhibits small intestinal motility and slows small intestinal transit in both healthy volunteers and those with T2D (119, 122). This inhibition of small intestinal motility induced by GLP-1 and GLP-1RAs may be mediated by vagal afferents, as well as a direct action on the central nervous system (150-152).

When compared to the small intestine, even less is known about the effects of GLP-1 and GLP-1RAs on colorectal function. A patient with a neuroendocrine tumor secreting large amounts of GLP-1 and GLP-2 exhibited delayed transit through the gastrointestinal tract, including the colon (153), whereas the use of GLP-1RAs has recently been reported to be associated with lower quality bowel preparation for colonoscopy (154). In contrast, acute administration of the GLP-1RA, ROSE-010, in women with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome showed that colonic transit was accelerated, rather than delayed (155).

A number of case reports have linked the use of GLP-1RAs (123, 156), and the dual GIP-/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide (127), to bowel obstruction or ileus. Several studies (126, 157-161) utilizing large medical databases have subsequently systematically investigated whether such an association exists and the majority of studies suggest that there is an association. However, in these studies, use of DPP-4 inhibitors was, in general, associated with a higher risk of intestinal obstruction than GLP-1RAs (126, 157, 161, 162), which is surprising given the minimal effect of GIP on gastric emptying and the marginally elevated GLP-1 concentrations observed (54, 163).

It is clear that more information is needed to define the effects of GLP-1RAs on both small and large intestinal motility (146), including whether these are susceptible to tachyphylaxis with repeated dosing, as may be the case with slowing of gastric emptying.

Conclusion

GLP-1RA and GLP-1/GIP co-agonist therapies may have major effects on gastrointestinal and biliary tract motility. An improved understanding is likely to facilitate more personalized use and will inform the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Acknowledgments

R.J.J. is supported by the Royal Adelaide Hospital Mary Overton Early Career Fellowship. C.S.M. is supported by an Early Career Fellowship provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. K.L.J. is supported by the William T. Southcott Senior Research Fellowship from the University of Adelaide. T.W. is supported by a Mid-Career Fellowship from The Hospital Research Foundation, South Australia.

Abbreviations

3D

3-dimensional

CCK

cholecystokinin

DPP-4

dipeptidyl-dipeptidase-4

GLP-1

glucagon-like peptide-1

PYY

peptide YY

RA

receptor agonist

T1D

type 1 diabetes

T2D

type 2 diabetes

Contributor Information

Ryan J Jalleh, Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Chinmay S Marathe, Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Christopher K Rayner, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Karen L Jones, Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Mahesh M Umapathysivam, Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Southern Adelaide Diabetes and Endocrine Service, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.

Tongzhi Wu, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Daniel R Quast, Diabetes, Endocrinology, Metabolism Section, Medical Department I, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH, Sankt Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, D-44791 Bochum, Germany.

Mark P Plummer, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Michael A Nauck, Diabetes, Endocrinology, Metabolism Section, Medical Department I, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH, Sankt Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, D-44791 Bochum, Germany; Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.

Michael Horowitz, Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Funding

This review was not funded by any specific grant.

Disclosures

C.S.M. has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, and educational events from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly & Co., Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck, Sharp & Dohme. C.K.R. has received research funding from NHMRC, Diabetes Australia, Novartis and Sanofi; he has received honoraria for lectures from Eli Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim and participated in advisory boards for Glyscend Therapeutics. K.L.J. holds stock options with Glyscend Therapeutics and is supported by a University of Adelaide William T Southcott Senior Research Fellowship in Nuclear Medicine. M.M.U. has received honoraria for educational events by Boehringer Ingelheim and research funding from Australian Diabetes Society and Astra Zeneca. T.W. has received travel support from Novartis and Sanofi and research funding from Novartis. D.R.Q. has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, and educational events by Eli Lilly & Co. and Novo Nordisk and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly & Co. and Cook Medical. M.A.N. has been a member on advisory boards or has consulted with Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Co., Medtronic, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, Regor, Sun Pharma, and Structure Therapeutics (ShouTi, Gasherbrum); he has received grant support from Merck, Sharp & Dohme and has also served on the speakers’ bureau of Eli Lilly & Co., Menarini/Berlin Chemie, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Medscape, Medical Learning Institute, NovoNordisk. M.H. has participated in the advisory boards and/or symposia for Inova and has received honoraria for this activity; he is a shareholder with Mirum Pharmaceuticals and holds stock options with Glyscend Therapeutics. The other authors have no disclosures.

Data Availability

Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created in this review.

References

  • 1. Marx  N, Husain  M, Lehrke  M, Verma  S, Sattar  N. GLP-1 receptor agonists for the reduction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Circulation. 2022;146(24):1882‐1894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Shaman  AM, Bain  SC, Bakris  GL, et al.  Effect of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists semaglutide and liraglutide on kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of SUSTAIN 6 and LEADER. Circulation. 2022;145(8):575‐585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lincoff  AM, Brown-Frandsen  K, Colhoun  HM, et al.  Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in obesity without diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221‐2232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rosenstock  J, Frias  J, Jastreboff  AM, et al.  Retatrutide, a GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, for people with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo and active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 trial conducted in the USA. Lancet. 2023;402(10401):529‐544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jastreboff  AM, Kaplan  LM, Frias  JP, et al.  Triple-hormone-receptor agonist retatrutide for obesity - a phase 2 trial. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(6):514‐526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Karakasis  P, Patoulias  D, Pamporis  K, et al.  Safety and efficacy of the new, oral, small-molecule, GLP-1 receptor agonists orforglipron and danuglipron for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Metabolism. 2023;149:155710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Andrews  L. Mother, 56, who took Ozempic to slim down for her daughter's wedding dies from gastrointestinal illness after months of vomiting and diarrhea [Internet]. Daily Mail. Australia 2023. Accessed August 26, 2024. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12716307/Dying-Mother-56-took-Ozempic-slim-daughters-wedding-DIES-blocked-bowel-months-vomiting-diarrhea.html.
  • 8. Drucker  DJ. Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 medicines for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(11):1873‐1888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Camilleri  M, Sanders  KM. Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(1):68‐87.e61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Marathe  CS, Rayner  CK, Jones  KL, Horowitz  M. Effects of GLP-1 and incretin-based therapies on gastrointestinal motor function. Exp Diabetes Res. 2011;2011:279530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Code  CF, Marlett  JA. The interdigestive myo-electric complex of the stomach and small bowel of dogs. J Physiol. 1975;246(2):289‐309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Brener  W, Hendrix  TR, McHugh  PR. Regulation of the gastric emptying of glucose. Gastroenterology. 1983;85(1):76‐82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Phillips  LK, Deane  AM, Jones  KL, Rayner  CK, Horowitz  M. Gastric emptying and glycaemia in health and diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(2):112‐128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Watson  LE, Xie  C, Wang  X, et al.  Gastric emptying in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes compared with young and older control subjects without diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(8):3311‐3319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sun  Y, Luo  Y, Xiang  C, et al.  Gastric emptying in newly diagnosed, treatment-naive Han Chinese with type 2 diabetes and the impact of 4-week insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(8):3078‐3087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Xie  C, Huang  W, Wang  X, et al.  Gastric emptying in health and type 2 diabetes: an evaluation using a 75g oral glucose drink. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;171:108610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Xiang  C, Sun  Y, Luo  Y, et al.  Gastric emptying is slower in women than men with type 2 diabetes and impacts on postprandial glycaemia. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26:3119‐3127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wang  X, Xie  C, Marathe  CS, et al.  Disparities in gastric emptying and postprandial glycaemia between Han Chinese and Caucasians with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;159:107951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Marathe  CS, Horowitz  M, Trahair  LG, et al.  Relationships of early and late glycemic responses with gastric emptying during an oral glucose tolerance test. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(9):3565‐3571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Jalleh  RJ, Wu  T, Jones  KL, Rayner  CK, Horowitz  M, Marathe  CS. Relationships of glucose, GLP-1, and insulin secretion with gastric emptying after a 75-g glucose load in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(9):3850‐3856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Xiang  C, Sun  Y, Luo  Y, et al.  Gastric emptying of a glucose drink is predictive of the glycaemic response to oral glucose and mixed meals, but unrelated to antecedent glycaemic control, in type 2 diabetes. Nutr Diabetes. 2024;14(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Marathe  CS, Rayner  CK, Jones  KL, Horowitz  M. Relationships between gastric emptying, postprandial glycemia, and incretin hormones. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(5):1396‐1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wren  AM, Bloom  SR. Gut hormones and appetite control. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(6):2116‐2130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Van Citters  GW, Lin  HC. Ileal brake: neuropeptidergic control of intestinal transit. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006;8(5):367‐373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Plummer  MP, Jones  KL, Cousins  CE, et al.  Hyperglycemia potentiates the slowing of gastric emptying induced by exogenous GLP-1. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1123‐1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Aigner  L, Becker  B, Gerken  S, Quast  DR, Meier  JJ, Nauck  MA. Day-to-day variations in fasting plasma glucose do not influence gastric emptying in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(2):479‐488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Blundell  JE, Halford  JC. Regulation of nutrient supply: the brain and appetite control. Proc Nutr Soc. 1994;53(2):407‐418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Halawi  H, Camilleri  M, Acosta  A, et al.  Relationship of gastric emptying or accommodation with satiation, satiety, and postprandial symptoms in health. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017;313(5):G442‐G447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tack  J, Verbeure  W, Mori  H, et al.  The gastrointestinal tract in hunger and satiety signalling. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021;9(6):727‐734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sturm  K, Parker  B, Wishart  J, et al.  Energy intake and appetite are related to antral area in healthy young and older subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(3):656‐667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Cifuentes  L, Camilleri  M, Acosta  A. Gastric sensory and motor functions and energy intake in health and obesity-therapeutic implications. Nutrients. 2021;13(4):1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Griffith  GH, Owen  GM, Kirkman  S, Shields  R. Measurement of rate of gastric emptying using chromium-51. Lancet. 1966;1(7449):1244‐1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Collins  PJ, Horowitz  M, Cook  DJ, Harding  PE, Shearman  DJ. Gastric emptying in normal subjects–a reproducible technique using a single scintillation camera and computer system. Gut. 1983;24(12):1117‐1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Jones  KL, Horowitz  M, Wishart  MJ, Maddox  AF, Harding  PE, Chatterton  BE. Relationships between gastric emptying, intragastric meal distribution and blood glucose concentrations in diabetes mellitus. J Nucl Med. 1995;36(12):2220‐2228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Jalleh  R, Pham  H, Marathe  CS, et al.  Acute effects of lixisenatide on energy intake in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes: relationship to gastric emptying and intragastric distribution. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ghoos  YF, Maes  BD, Geypens  BJ, et al.  Measurement of gastric emptying rate of solids by means of a carbon-labeled octanoic acid breath test. Gastroenterology. 1993;104(6):1640‐1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Braden  B, Adams  S, Duan  LP, et al.  The [13C]acetate breath test accurately reflects gastric emptying of liquids in both liquid and semisolid test meals. Gastroenterology. 1995;108(4):1048‐1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Choi  MG, Camilleri  M, Burton  DD, Zinsmeister  AR, Forstrom  LA, Nair  KS. [13c]octanoic acid breath test for gastric emptying of solids: accuracy, reproducibility, and comparison with scintigraphy. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(4):1155‐1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Trahair  LG, Nauck  MA, Wu  T, et al.  Measurement of gastric emptying using a 13C-octanoic acid breath test with wagner-Nelson analysis and scintigraphy in type 2 diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2022;130(11):751‐757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. von Gerichten  J, Elnesr  MH, Prollins  JE, et al.  The [(13) C]octanoic acid breath test for gastric emptying quantification: a focus on nutrition and modeling. Lipids. 2022;57(4-5):205‐219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hveem  K, Jones  KL, Chatterton  BE, Horowitz  M. Scintigraphic measurement of gastric emptying and ultrasonographic assessment of antral area: relation to appetite. Gut. 1996;38(6):816‐821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gentilcore  D, Chaikomin  R, Jones  KL, et al.  Effects of fat on gastric emptying of and the glycemic, insulin, and incretin responses to a carbohydrate meal in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(6):2062‐2067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Stevens  JE, Gilja  OH, Gentilcore  D, Hausken  T, Horowitz  M, Jones  KL. Measurement of gastric emptying of a high-nutrient liquid by 3D ultrasonography in diabetic gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(3):220‐225. e113-224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Horowitz  M, Rayner  CK, Marathe  CS, Wu  T, Jones  KL. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and the appropriate measurement of gastric emptying. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(12):2504‐2506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Bartholome  R, Salden  B, Vrolijk  MF, et al.  Paracetamol as a post prandial marker for gastric emptying, a food-drug interaction on absorption. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):0136618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Hjerpsted  JB, Flint  A, Brooks  A, Axelsen  MB, Kvist  T, Blundell  J. Semaglutide improves postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism, and delays first-hour gastric emptying in subjects with obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(3):610‐619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Dahl  K, Brooks  A, Almazedi  F, Hoff  ST, Boschini  C, Baekdal  TA. Oral semaglutide improves postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism, and delays gastric emptying, in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(7):1594‐1603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Horowitz  M, Rayner  CK, Marathe  CS, Wu  T, Umapathysivam  M, Jones  KL. Response to Dahl et al.: Oral semaglutide improves postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism, and delays gastric emptying, in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(10):2411‐2413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hiramoto  B, McCarty  TR, Lodhia  NA, et al.  Quantified metrics of gastric emptying delay by glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis with insights for periprocedural management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(6):1126‐1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Kovoor  JG, Rayner  CK, Wu  T, et al.  Effect of lixisenatide on liquid gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes – implications for the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists before procedures. J Diabetes Complications. 2024;38(8):108793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Wettergren  A, Schjoldager  B, Mortensen  PE, Myhre  J, Christiansen  J, Holst  JJ. Truncated GLP-1 (proglucagon 78-107-amide) inhibits gastric and pancreatic functions in man. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(4):665‐673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Willms  B, Werner  J, Holst  JJ, Orskov  C, Creutzfeldt  W, Nauck  MA. Gastric emptying, glucose responses, and insulin secretion after a liquid test meal: effects of exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-(7-36) amide in type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(1):327‐332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Little  TJ, Pilichiewicz  AN, Russo  A, et al.  Effects of intravenous glucagon-like peptide-1 on gastric emptying and intragastric distribution in healthy subjects: relationships with postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(5):1916‐1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Meier  JJ, Goetze  O, Anstipp  J, et al.  Gastric inhibitory polypeptide does not inhibit gastric emptying in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;286(4):E621‐E625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Halim  MA, Degerblad  M, Sundbom  M, et al.  Glucagon-like peptide-1 inhibits prandial gastrointestinal motility through myenteric neuronal mechanisms in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(2):575‐585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Schirra  J, Nicolaus  M, Roggel  R, et al.  Endogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 controls endocrine pancreatic secretion and antro-pyloro-duodenal motility in humans. Gut. 2006;55(2):243‐251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Deane  AM, Nguyen  NQ, Stevens  JE, et al.  Endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 slows gastric emptying in healthy subjects, attenuating postprandial glycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(1):215‐221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Steinert  RE, Schirra  J, Meyer-Gerspach  AC, et al.  Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonism on appetite and food intake in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(2):514‐523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Witte  AB, Gryback  P, Holst  JJ, et al.  Differential effect of PYY1-36 and PYY3-36 on gastric emptying in man. Regul Pept. 2009;158(1-3):57‐62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Deane  AM, Chapman  MJ, Fraser  RJ, et al.  Effects of exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 on gastric emptying and glucose absorption in the critically ill: relationship to glycemia. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(5):1261‐1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Umapathysivam  MM, Lee  MY, Jones  KL, et al.  Comparative effects of prolonged and intermittent stimulation of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor on gastric emptying and glycemia. Diabetes. 2014;63(2):785‐790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Hellstrom  PM, Naslund  E, Edholm  T, et al.  GLP-1 suppresses gastrointestinal motility and inhibits the migrating motor complex in healthy subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20(6):649‐659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Tolessa  T, Gutniak  M, Holst  JJ, Efendic  S, Hellstrom  PM. Inhibitory effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 on small bowel motility. Fasting but not fed motility inhibited via nitric oxide independently of insulin and somatostatin. J Clin Invest. 1998;102(4):764‐774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Stevens  JE, Buttfield  M, Wu  T, et al.  Effects of sitagliptin on gastric emptying of, and the glycaemic and blood pressure responses to, a carbohydrate meal in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(1):51‐58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Deacon  CF. Physiology and pharmacology of DPP-4 in glucose homeostasis and the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Schmidt  PT, Naslund  E, Gryback  P, et al.  Peripheral administration of GLP-2 to humans has no effect on gastric emptying or satiety. Regul Pept. 2003;116(1-3):21‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Meier  JJ, Nauck  MA, Pott  A, et al.  Glucagon-like peptide 2 stimulates glucagon secretion, enhances lipid absorption, and inhibits gastric acid secretion in humans. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(1):44‐54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Nagell  CF, Wettergren  A, Pedersen  JF, Mortensen  D, Holst  JJ. Glucagon-like peptide-2 inhibits antral emptying in man, but is not as potent as glucagon-like peptide-1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39(4):353‐358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Jalleh  RJ, Jones  KL, Rayner  CK, Marathe  CS, Wu  T, Horowitz  M. Normal and disordered gastric emptying in diabetes: recent insights into (patho)physiology, management and impact on glycaemic control. Diabetologia. 2022;65(12):1981‐1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Edwards  CM, Stanley  SA, Davis  R, et al.  Exendin-4 reduces fasting and postprandial glucose and decreases energy intake in healthy volunteers. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281(1):E155‐E161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Linnebjerg  H, Park  S, Kothare  PA, et al.  Effect of exenatide on gastric emptying and relationship to postprandial glycemia in type 2 diabetes. Regul Pept. 2008;151(1-3):123‐129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Drucker  DJ, Buse  JB, Taylor  K, et al.  Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study. Lancet. 2008;372(9645):1240‐1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Meier  JJ, Rosenstock  J, Hincelin-Mery  A, et al.  Contrasting effects of lixisenatide and liraglutide on postprandial glycemic control, gastric emptying, and safety parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes on optimized insulin glargine with or without metformin: a randomized, open-label trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(7):1263‐1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Quast  DR, Schenker  N, Menge  BA, Nauck  MA, Kapitza  C, Meier  JJ. Effects of lixisenatide versus liraglutide (short- and long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists) on esophageal and gastric function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(9):2137‐2145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Rayner  CK, Watson  LE, Phillips  LK, et al.  Effects of sustained treatment with lixisenatide on gastric emptying and postprandial glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(8):1813‐1821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Lorenz  M, Pfeiffer  C, Steinstrasser  A, et al.  Effects of lixisenatide once daily on gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes–relationship to postprandial glycemia. Regul Pept. 2013;185:1‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Jones  KL, Rigda  RS, Buttfield  MDM, et al.  Effects of lixisenatide on postprandial blood pressure, gastric emptying and glycaemia in healthy people and people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(5):1158‐1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Bae  JH, Choi  HJ, Cho  KIK, Kim  LK, Kwon  JS, Cho  YM. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist differentially affects brain activation in response to visual food cues in lean and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2020;44(2):248‐259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Flint  A, Kapitza  C, Zdravkovic  M. The once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide impacts appetite and energy intake in patients with type 2 diabetes after short-term treatment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(10):958‐962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Gibbons  C, Blundell  J, Tetens Hoff  S, Dahl  K, Bauer  R, Baekdal  T. Effects of oral semaglutide on energy intake, food preference, appetite, control of eating and body weight in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(2):581‐588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Horowitz  M, Flint  A, Jones  KL, et al.  Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97(2):258‐266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Quast  DR, Nauck  MA, Schenker  N, Menge  BA, Kapitza  C, Meier  JJ. Macronutrient intake, appetite, food preferences and exocrine pancreas function after treatment with short- and long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(10):2344‐2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Valenzuela-Vallejo  L, Chrysafi  P, Mantzoros  CS. Liraglutide-induced effects on energy intake and glycemic profile are independent of total and intact GDF-15 levels in subjects with obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2022;48(5):101369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Acosta  A, Camilleri  M, Burton  D, et al.  Exenatide in obesity with accelerated gastric emptying: a randomized, pharmacodynamics study. Physiol Rep. 2015;3(11):e12610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Basolo  A, Burkholder  J, Osgood  K, et al.  Exenatide has a pronounced effect on energy intake but not energy expenditure in non-diabetic subjects with obesity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Metabolism. 2018;85:116‐125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Blundell  J, Finlayson  G, Axelsen  M, et al.  Effects of once-weekly semaglutide on appetite, energy intake, control of eating, food preference and body weight in subjects with obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(9):1242‐1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Gabe  MBN, Breitschaft  A, Knop  FK, et al.  Effect of oral semaglutide on energy intake, appetite, control of eating and gastric emptying in adults living with obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(10):4480  4489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Friedrichsen  M, Breitschaft  A, Tadayon  S, Wizert  A, Skovgaard  D. The effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly on energy intake, appetite, control of eating, and gastric emptying in adults with obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(3):754‐762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Schlogl  H, Kabisch  S, Horstmann  A, et al.  Exenatide-induced reduction in energy intake is associated with increase in hypothalamic connectivity. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):1933‐1940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Shoemaker  AH, Silver  HJ, Buchowski  M, et al.  Energy balance in hypothalamic obesity in response to treatment with a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022;46(3):623‐629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Silver  HJ, Olson  D, Mayfield  D, et al.  Effect of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, compared to caloric restriction, on appetite, dietary intake, body fat distribution and cardiometabolic biomarkers: a randomized trial in adults with obesity and prediabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(8):2340‐2350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. van Can  J, Sloth  B, Jensen  CB, Flint  A, Blaak  EE, Saris  WH. Effects of the once-daily GLP-1 analog liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese, non-diabetic adults. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014;38(6):784‐793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Dube  MC, D'Amours  M, Weisnagel  SJ. Effect of liraglutide on food consumption, appetite sensations and eating behaviours in overweight people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(8):1417‐1424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Watson  LE, Phillips  LK, Wu  T, et al.  A whey/guar “preload” improves postprandial glycaemia and glycated haemoglobin levels in type 2 diabetes: a 12-week, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(4):930‐938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Nguyen  NQ, Debreceni  TL, Burgstad  CM, et al.  Effects of fat and protein preloads on pouch emptying, intestinal transit, glycaemia, gut hormones, glucose absorption, blood pressure and gastrointestinal symptoms after roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):77‐84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Ishii  M, Nakamura  T, Kasai  F, Onuma  T, Baba  T, Takebe  K. Altered postprandial insulin requirement in IDDM patients with gastroparesis. Diabetes Care. 1994;17(8):901‐903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Lysy  J, Israeli  E, Strauss-Liviatan  N, Goldin  E. Relationships between hypoglycaemia and gastric emptying abnormalities in insulin-treated diabetic patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18(6):433‐440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Horowitz  M, Jones  KL, Rayner  CK, Read  NW. Gastric’ hypoglycaemia–an important concept in diabetes management. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18(6):405‐407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Frier  BM. Hypoglycaemia in diabetes mellitus: epidemiology and clinical implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(12):711‐722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Marathe  CS, Marathe  JA, Rayner  CK, Kar  P, Jones  KL, Horowitz  M. Hypoglycaemia and gastric emptying. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(3):491‐498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Bachrach  WH. Action of insulin hypoglycemia on motor and secretory functions of the digestive tract. Physiol Rev. 1953;33(4):566‐592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Russo  A, Stevens  JE, Chen  R, et al.  Insulin-induced hypoglycemia accelerates gastric emptying of solids and liquids in long-standing type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(8):4489‐4495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Murthy  TA, Grivell  J, Hatzinikolas  S, et al.  Acceleration of gastric emptying by insulin-induced hypoglycemia is dependent on the degree of hypoglycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(2):364‐371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Kar  P, Jones  KL, Plummer  MP, et al.  Antecedent hypoglycemia does not attenuate the acceleration of gastric emptying by hypoglycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(11):3953‐3960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Lerche  S, Soendergaard  L, Rungby  J, et al.  No increased risk of hypoglycaemic episodes during 48 h of subcutaneous glucagon-like-peptide-1 administration in fasting healthy subjects. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;71(4):500‐506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Nauck  M, Frid  A, Hermansen  K, et al.  Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(1):84‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Filippatos  TD, Panagiotopoulou  TV, Elisaf  MS. Adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists. Rev Diabet Stud. 2014;11(3-4):202‐230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Zhao  Z, Tang  Y, Hu  Y, Zhu  H, Chen  X, Zhao  B. Hypoglycemia following the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a real-world analysis of post-marketing surveillance data. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(18):1482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Shyangdan  DS, Royle  P, Clar  C, Sharma  P, Waugh  N, Snaith  A. Glucagon-like peptide analogues for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2011(10):CD006423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Plummer  MP, Jones  KL, Annink  CE, et al.  Glucagon-like peptide 1 attenuates the acceleration of gastric emptying induced by hypoglycemia in healthy subjects. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1509‐1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Jalleh  RJ, Quast  D, Kamruzzaman  M, et al.  [Abstract] short-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy delays gastric emptying during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia as well as euglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2024;67(Suppl 1):S45‐S45. [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Frias  JP, Deenadayalan  S, Erichsen  L, et al.  Efficacy and safety of co-administered once-weekly cagrilintide 2.4 mg with once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg in type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2023;402(10403):720‐730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Flint  A, Kapitza  C, Hindsberger  C, Zdravkovic  M. The once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog liraglutide improves postprandial glucose levels in type 2 diabetes patients. Adv Ther. 2011;28(3):213‐226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Nagai  Y, Hashimoto  E, Oikawa  R, et al.  Differing effects of liraglutide on gastric emptying in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(6):573‐576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Hompesch  M, Kang  J, Han  O, et al.  Effects of efpeglenatide versus liraglutide on gastric emptying, glucose metabolism and beta-cell function in people with type 2 diabetes: an exploratory, randomized phase Ib study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021;9(1):e002208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Camilleri  M, Carlson  P, Dilmaghani  S. Prevalence and variations in gastric emptying delay in response to GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024;32(2):232‐233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Urva  S, Coskun  T, Loghin  C, et al.  The novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tirzepatide transiently delays gastric emptying similarly to selective long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(10):1886‐1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Keller  J, Trautmann  ME, Haber  H, et al.  Effect of exenatide on cholecystokinin-induced gallbladder emptying in fasting healthy subjects. Regul Pept. 2012;179(1-3):77‐83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Thazhath  SS, Marathe  CS, Wu  T, et al.  The glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist exenatide inhibits small intestinal motility, flow, transit, and absorption of glucose in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes. 2016;65(1):269‐275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Therapeutic Goods Administration . [Internet] Extract from the clinical evaluation report for lixisenatide. December 5, 2012. Accessed June 3, 2024. https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-lixisenatide-130820-cer.pdf
  • 121. Nexoe-Larsen  CC, Sorensen  PH, Hausner  H, et al.  Effects of liraglutide on gallbladder emptying: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with overweight or obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(11):2557‐2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Nakatani  Y, Maeda  M, Matsumura  M, et al.  Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonist on gastrointestinal tract motility and residue rates as evaluated by capsule endoscopy. Diabetes Metab. 2017;43(5):430‐437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Gandhi  A, Khanam  V, Peterson  D, Patel  F, Kulairi  Z. MON-681 dulaglutide commonly known as Trulicity; an anti-diabetic medication causing small bowel obstruction. J Endocr Soc. 2020;4(Suppl 1):MON-681. [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Barrington  P, Chien  JY, Showalter  HD, et al.  A 5-week study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LY2189265, a novel, long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(5):426‐433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Shaddinger  BC, Young  MA, Billiard  J, Collins  DA, Hussaini  A, Nino  A. Effect of albiglutide on cholecystokinin-induced gallbladder emptying in healthy individuals: a randomized crossover study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57(10):1322‐1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Gudin  B, Ladhari  C, Robin  P, et al.  Incretin-based drugs and intestinal obstruction: a pharmacovigilance study. Therapie. 2020;75(6):641‐647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Gordon  A, Dixit  K, Shachi  T, Salonia  J, Seltzer  E. A rare case of a large bowel obstruction due to tirzepatide. Chest. 2023;164(4):A2334‐A2335. [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Halawi  H, Khemani  D, Eckert  D, et al.  Effects of liraglutide on weight, satiation, and gastric functions in obesity: a randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(12):890‐899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Maselli  D, Atieh  J, Clark  MM, et al.  Effects of liraglutide on gastrointestinal functions and weight in obesity: a randomized clinical and pharmacogenomic trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022;30(8):1608‐1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Jones  KL, Huynh  LQ, Hatzinikolas  S, et al.  Exenatide once weekly slows gastric emptying of solids and liquids in healthy, overweight people at steady-state concentrations. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(5):788‐797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Jensterle  M, Ferjan  S, Lezaic  L, et al.  Semaglutide delays 4-hour gastric emptying in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(4):975‐984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Pizzimenti  V, Giandalia  A, Cucinotta  D, et al.  Incretin-based therapy and acute cholecystitis: a review of case reports and EudraVigilance spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting database. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41(2):116‐118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Monami  M, Nreu  B, Scatena  A, et al.  Safety issues with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and cholelithiasis): data from randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(9):1233‐1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Aune  D, Vatten  LJ. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of gallbladder disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Diabetes Complications. 2016;30(2):368‐373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Gether  IM, Nexoe-Larsen  C, Knop  FK. New avenues in the regulation of gallbladder motility - implications for the use of glucagon-like peptide-derived drugs. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(7):2463‐2472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. US Food and Drug Administration . [Internet] Drugs @ FDA: FDA approved drug products. Accessed June 3, 2024. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm
  • 137. He  L, Wang  J, Ping  F, et al.  Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use with risk of gallbladder and biliary diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(5):513‐519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Rehfeld  JF, Knop  FK, Asmar  A, Madsbad  S, Holst  JJ, Asmar  M. Cholecystokinin secretion is suppressed by glucagon-like peptide-1: clue to the mechanism of the adverse gallbladder events of GLP-1-derived drugs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(12):1429‐1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Smits  MM, Tonneijck  L, Muskiet  MH, et al.  Biliary effects of liraglutide and sitagliptin, a 12-week randomized placebo-controlled trial in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(12):1217‐1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Nahmias  A, Stahel  P, Tian  L, Xiao  C, Lewis  GF. GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) is physiologically relevant for chylomicron secretion beyond its known pharmacological role. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41(6):1893‐1900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Matikainen  N, Manttari  S, Schweizer  A, et al.  Vildagliptin therapy reduces postprandial intestinal triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49(9):2049‐2057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Tremblay  AJ, Lamarche  B, Kelly  I, et al.  Effect of sitagliptin therapy on triglyceride-rich lipoprotein kinetics in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(12):1223‐1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Meier  JJ, Gethmann  A, Gotze  O, et al.  Glucagon-like peptide 1 abolishes the postprandial rise in triglyceride concentrations and lowers levels of non-esterified fatty acids in humans. Diabetologia. 2006;49(3):452‐458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Novodvorsky  P, Haluzik  M. The effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on postprandial lipaemia. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022;24(1):13‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Mather  KJ, Coskun  T, Pratt  EJ, et al.  Improvements in post-challenge lipid response following tirzepatide treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(2):785‐789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Horowitz  M, Aroda  VR, Han  J, Hardy  E, Rayner  CK. Upper and/or lower gastrointestinal adverse events with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: incidence and consequences. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(5):672‐681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Holst  JJ. Glucagonlike peptide 1: a newly discovered gastrointestinal hormone. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(6):1848‐1855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Schirra  J, Nicolaus  M, Woerle  HJ, Struckmeier  C, Katschinski  M, Goke  B. GLP-1 regulates gastroduodenal motility involving cholinergic pathways. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21(6):609‐618. e621-602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Schirra  J, Houck  P, Wank  U, Arnold  R, Goke  B, Katschinski  M. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide on antro-pyloro-duodenal motility in the interdigestive state and with duodenal lipid perfusion in humans. Gut. 2000;46(5):622‐631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Muller  TD, Bluher  M, Tschop  MH, DiMarchi  RD. Anti-obesity drug discovery: advances and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(3):201‐223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Imeryuz  N, Yegen  BC, Bozkurt  A, Coskun  T, Villanueva-Penacarrillo  ML, Ulusoy  NB. Glucagon-like peptide-1 inhibits gastric emptying via vagal afferent-mediated central mechanisms. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(4):G920‐G927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Krieger  JP, Arnold  M, Pettersen  KG, Lossel  P, Langhans  W, Lee  SJ. Knockdown of GLP-1 receptors in vagal afferents affects normal food intake and glycemia. Diabetes. 2016;65(1):34‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Brubaker  PL, Drucker  DJ, Asa  SL, Swallow  C, Redston  M, Greenberg  GR. Prolonged gastrointestinal transit in a patient with a glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1- and -2-producing neuroendocrine tumor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3078‐3083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Yao  R, Gala  KS, Ghusn  W, Abboud  DM, Wallace  FK, Vargas  EJ. Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(6):1154‐1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Camilleri  M, Vazquez-Roque  M, Iturrino  J, et al.  Effect of a glucagon-like peptide 1 analog, ROSE-010, on GI motor functions in female patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303(1):G120‐G128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Shetty  R, Basheer  FT, Poojari  PG, Thunga  G, Chandran  VP, Acharya  LD. Adverse drug reactions of GLP-1 agonists: a systematic review of case reports. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022;16(3):102427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Faillie  JL, Yin  H, Yu  OHY, et al.  Incretin-based drugs and risk of intestinal obstruction among patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;111(1):272‐282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Wu  T, Zhang  Y, Shi  Y, et al.  Safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a real-world study based on the US FDA adverse event reporting system database. Clin Drug Investig. 2022;42(11):965‐975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Liu  L, Chen  J, Wang  L, Chen  C, Chen  L. Association between different GLP-1 receptor agonists and gastrointestinal adverse reactions: a real-world disproportionality study based on FDA adverse event reporting system database. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:1043789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Sodhi  M, Rezaeianzadeh  R, Kezouh  A, Etminan  M. Risk of gastrointestinal adverse events associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight loss. JAMA. 2023;330(18):1795‐1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Ueda  P, Wintzell  V, Melbye  M, et al.  Use of DPP4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists and risk of intestinal obstruction: Scandinavian cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;22(6):1226‐1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Bennett  D, Dave  S, Sakaguchi  M, Chang  CH, Dolin  P. Association between therapy with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and risk of ileus: a cohort study. Diabetol Int. 2016;7(4):375‐383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Vardarli  I, Arndt  E, Deacon  CF, Holst  JJ, Nauck  MA. Effects of sitagliptin and metformin treatment on incretin hormone and insulin secretory responses to oral and “isoglycemic” intravenous glucose. Diabetes. 2014;63(2):663‐674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created in this review.


Articles from Endocrinology are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES