Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1263:13–23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44518-8_2

Neutrophil Elastase and Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Tumor Microenvironment

Hai Huang 1, Hongji Zhang 2,3, Amblessed E Onuma 4, Allan Tsung 5
PMCID: PMC11770835  NIHMSID: NIHMS1953102  PMID: 32588320

Abstract

Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) play a major role during cancer development and progression in the tumor microenvironment. Neutrophil elastase (NE) is a serine protease normally expressed in neutrophil primary granules. Formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), a mechanism used by neutrophils, has been traditionally associated with the capture and killing of bacteria. However, there are recent discoveries suggesting that NE secretion and NETs formation are also involved in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we focus on how NE and NETs play a key regulatory function in the tumor microenvironment, such as tumor proliferation, distant metastasis, tumor-associated thrombosis, and antitumor activity. Additionally, the potential use of NETs, NE, or associated molecules as potential disease activity biomarkers or therapeutic targets will be introduced.

Keywords: Antitumor; Biomarker; Cancer; Metastasis; N1 neutrophil, N2 neutrophil, DNase; NETosis; Neutrophil; Neutrophil elastase (NE); Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET); PAD4; Therapeutic target; Tumor microenvironment; Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs)

2.1. Introduction of Tumor-Associated Neutrophils (TANs)

Neutrophils, also known as polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs), are the most abundant white blood cells in human circulation accounting for approximately 60% of all leukocytes [1]. They are the first immune cells to respond to inflammatory or infectious etiologies as they are crucial participants in the proper functioning of both innate and adaptive immune responses [2]. As part of their key role, neutrophils are the first line of immune defense against invading pathogens and also participate in the development of inflammatory cascades [3, 4]. Neutrophils have a unique polymorphic nucleus that is segregated into 3–5 lobules in humans, with each lobule having a diameter of approximately 2 μm [5]. In healthy individuals, most neutrophils are destined to be cleared even without ever performing their function. During infection, they have crucial roles in the clearance of microorganisms [4, 6].

Currently, there is increasing evidence demonstrating that not only do neutrophils play key roles in inflammatory diseases but also in cancer as neutrophils have both pro- and antitumor properties [79]. Neutrophils accumulate in many types of human and murine tumors and regulate nearly all steps of tumor progression. Neutrophils are involved in cancer through multiple mechanisms and have been implicated in almost all stages of the oncogenic process including tumor initiation, growth, proliferation, and metastases [1013]. Human and mice studies have shown that there are two neutrophil phenotypes: antitumor N1 neutrophils and protumorigenic N2 neutrophils [14, 15]. Tumor-associated neutrophils (TAN) can be activated under various conditions resulting in antitumor and protumor functions [14]. Although the ability of TANs to promote or prevent cancer progression is not fully understood, we know that TANs consist of various polarization states, and the mechanism behind this polarization is ill defined. Here we aim to review the existing evidence of neutrophil recruitment, functions as well as the different regulators of neutrophil in the tumor microenvironment.

Neutrophils found within the tumor play a central role in inflammation and are attracted by CXCR2 ligands such as CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL5 [13, 16]. The initiation of tumor growth can be promoted by neutrophils through the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), or proteases [17]. Neutrophils have been implicated in various cancers. Human colorectal cancer liver metastases and murine gastrointestinal liver metastases exhibit infiltration by neutrophils. The depletion of neutrophils in a murine liver metastases model has been shown to diminish metastatic growth through fibroblast growth factor 2 [18]. In human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) samples, over-expression of CXCL5 was well correlated with intratumoral neutrophil infiltration, shorter overall survival, and tumor recurrence [19]. The depletion of hepatic neutrophils via antibody has been shown to protect the liver from diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced HCC in murine models, since neutrophils stimulate hepatocellular ROS and telomere DNA damage [20]. In a mice flank tumor model, neutrophils contribute to the antitumor activity of TGF-b blockade [14]. Neutrophil-derived ROS are important regulators of protumorigenic γδ17 T cells that have been identified as immunosuppressive and antitumoral in a mice melanoma model [21].

Alternatively, neutrophil recruitment has been shown to be a key component of the antitumor efficacy of bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin treatment in bladder cancer, chemotherapy in mouse lung cancer, radiotherapy in several syngeneic mouse tumor models, rituximab and trastuzumab treatments in human non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and breast cancer, respectively [2226]. Activated TANs can also elicit antitumor functions either directly through lysis of tumor cells or by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [23, 27, 28].

2.2. Introduction of Neutrophil Elastase in Health and Disease

Neutrophil elastase (NE) belongs to the family of serine protease normally expressed in polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) [2931]. It plays a key role in numerous physiological and pathological processes, including antimicrobial defenses, inflammation, and cancer progression [2, 32]. During neutrophil degranulation or neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation, NE is released into the extracellular space in a process known as NETosis. Not only is NE a necessary component of NETs, but activated NE is also required for NET formation [33]. Although NE can also be released from neutrophils independent of NET formation, and rapidly inactivated by plasma antiproteases, DNA-associated NE appears to retain its proteolytic activity for extended periods [34, 35]. NE has been implicated as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease as it has been detected in the colonic mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis [3640].

It has been shown that activated NE protects against infection by destroying pathogenic bacteria [4]. Mutations in the ELA2 gene encoding neutrophil elastase (NE) occur in most cases of severe congenital neutropenia as well as sporadic and autosomal-dominant cyclic neutropenia [41, 42]. The release of NE is responsible for the activation of epithelial protease-activated receptors, which leads to cell shrinking and reduction of barrier function [43]. NE and ROS are required for TNFα-primed neutrophils and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies to cause increased pulmonary endothelial permeability and lung edema in a model of acute Wegener’s granulomatosis [44]. In addition, NE is also important in the reciprocal coupling between innate immunity and coagulation necessary for thrombus formation [45]. NE has been shown to decrease the allostimulatory ability of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells [2]. Finally, how neutrophil elastase is integrated in the activation, regulation, and effector mechanisms of cancers continues to be explored [46].

2.2.1. Neutrophil Elastase in Primary Tumor Initiation and Growth

NE has been shown to have a protumorigenic role in breast, lung, prostate, and colon cancers [4752]. Blocking the activity of NE in mouse models of numerous cancer types can significantly reduce the effect of neutrophils on tumor progression, and metastasis [47, 49, 50, 53]. NE promotes tumor growth in different ways either by increasing cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, or by inducing angiogenesis within the tumor microenvironment. NE may also contribute to tumorigenesis by inactivating tumor suppressors [47, 52, 5457]. Also, there is increased expression of NE within the tumor and in circulation during tumorigenesis, which promotes tumor growth [5860]. NE may directly induce tumor cell proliferation in both human and mouse lung adenocarcinomas by gaining access to an endosomal compartment within tumor cells where it degrades insulin receptor substrate-1 [47]. It has been shown that the production of NE from TANs may be involved in tumor invasion, which is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lastly, NE may facilitate the invasion of cancer cell either by directly dissolving the tumor matrix or indirectly by activating a protease cascade [61].

NE released from activated neutrophils may also mediate PI3K-associated signaling pathway for tumor cell proliferation and promote the growth and progression of cancer cells. The treatment of esophageal cancer cell lines with NE induces the release of growth factors, including protransforming growth factor-alpha, platelet-derived growth factor-AA, platelet-derived growth factor-BB, and vascular endothelial growth factor. Furthermore, use of Sivelestat, a specific NE inhibitor, significantly inhibits the release of these growth factors [47, 57]. EMILIN1, a multidomain glycoprotein expressed in several tissues, exerts a crucial regulatory tumor suppression function through the engagement of α4/α9 integrins. This tumor suppressor function of EMILIN1was impaired through its cleavage by NE, a process that has been implicated in the digestion of sarcomas and ovarian cancers [54].

2.2.2. Neutrophil Elastase in Cancer Metastases

In human studies, NE has been associated with breast cancer metastasis, and the detection of tumor NE level might be helpful in selecting the appropriate individualized treatment for patients with breast cancer [51, 62]. The release of NE can also facilitate non-small cell lung cancer metastasis by degrading basement membranes and allowing egress of tumor cells into the circulation [63, 64]. ONO-5046.Na is a specific NE inhibitor that has been reported to reduce hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting accumulation of neutrophils [65, 66]. Ischemia-reperfusion injury has been implicated in liver metastasis and ONO-5046.Na may reduce the burden of metastasis through reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury [67].

2.2.3. Neutrophil Elastase as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer

It has been reported that NE released by TANs can be taken up by breast cancer cells, which could enhance their susceptibility to cytotoxic T lymphocyte lysis [60, 68]. In a colorectal cancer mouse model, a higher expression of active NE was detected in the tumor and giving the NE inhibitor Sivelestat inhibited tumor growth. Within human colorectal cancer tissue, increased amounts of NE expression were detected compared to the adjacent nontumor tissues. In addition, the serum NE concentration in colorectal cancer patients was significantly higher than that in the healthy controls, indicating that the NE levels in serum may also potentially be a diagnostic marker of colorectal cancer in patients [49]. Investigation of Sivelestat use for cancer therapy should be further explored as its safety and efficacy have been tested in treatment of patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress [69, 70]. The NE inhibitors, AZD9668 and BAY-85–8501, were developed and studied in phase II clinical trials for pulmonary diseases. AZD9668 has the potential to reduce lung inflammation and the associated structural and functional changes in some other human diseases. BAY 85–8501 was shown to be safe and efficacious in a mouse acute lung injury model and recently is being tested in clinical studies for the treatment of pulmonary diseases [71, 72].

Taken together, NE could be of great value as a potential diagnostic marker or therapeutic target for cancer patients. Given that NE plays a key role in normal immune response to bacterial pathogens, there is a potential detrimental risk for infections if the drug is given chronically. Currently, there has been no clinical trial on the use of NE in cancer but in designing such trial, every step must be carefully considered in order to gain the greatest benefit [46].

2.3. Introduction of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Health and Disease

Neutrophils form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are large, extracellular, web-like structures composed of cytosolic and granule proteins that are assembled on a scaffold of decondensed chromatin [73]. The granular components are 25 nm in diameter and are normally stored in distinctive neutrophil granules that reside on the DNA backbone structure of NETs and provide antimicrobial activity [73, 74]. NETs can capture and kill bacteria, fungi, viruses, parasites and are thought to prevent bacterial and fungal dissemination [7579].

NET formation, also known as “NETosis,” describes the process by which neutrophils produce and release active NETs. It is important to note that NETosis is distinct from necrosis and apoptosis. This same process, which leads to neutrophil death, is also a mechanism of bacterial sequestration [74, 8082]. During NETosis, the nucleus first delobulates, while the granules disappear, followed by membrane vesiculation (Fig. 2.1). After nuclear disintegration, the chromatin expands, allowing contact between granular and cellular components. Finally, the cytoplasmic membrane ruptures, releasing NETs into the extracellular space [83]. In summary, NETosis is a form of neutrophil-specific cell death where neutrophils extrude extracellular fibers composed of chromatin and granule proteins that are characterized by the release of large web-like structures [84, 85].

Fig. 2.1.

Fig. 2.1

Formation of neutrophil extracellular traps

NETs have been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of immune-related diseases such as lupus nephritis when dysregulated [8688]. Increasing evidence suggests that the process by which neutrophils produce and release NETs not only happens in infections such as sepsis, but also has key role in noninfectious diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), diabetes, atherosclerosis, acute lung injury, hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury, thrombosis, and chronic liver disease [87, 89100]. In the past few years, there has been increasing evidence for a role of NETs in cancer [86].

2.3.1. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Primary Tumor Initiation and Growth

The first association of NETs in cancer was described in 2012 when neutrophils from tumor-bearing mice showed an increased propensity for NETosis upon stimulation with LPS [101]. NET-induced coagulation is a sequela of some malignancies and in an intestinal cancer model, coagulation and tumorigenesis was reduced by DNase [102, 103]. In a Lewis lung carcinoma model with hemorrhagic tumors, a large area of neutrophils and NET-like structures were found within the hemorrhagic tumors [104]. These hemorrhagic areas contained intact and primed hypercitrullinated neutrophils ready for NET formation [104]. In mouse insulinoma and breast cancer models, NET accumulation extends to the peripheral circulation, causing systemic inflammation and impaired vessel function in organs not infiltrated by tumor cells. DNase I treatment abolished these remote effects, suggesting that NETs mediate the collateral effects of tumors in distal organs [105]. Our group also recently found that blocking NETs can reduce the risk of HCC in the setting of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [100].

2.3.2. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Metastases

NETs have been implicated in cancer metastasis in the context of systemic infection. In a cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model, microvascular NET deposition and consequent trapping of circulating lung carcinoma cells within DNA webs were associated with increased formation of hepatic micrometastases. This effect was abolished by NET inhibition with DNase or neutrophil elastase inhibitor [106]. Our laboratory has reported that NET formation is accelerated immediately after major liver resection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Circulating MPO–DNA levels, a NET biomarker, was associated with a significant increase in early metastatic recurrence. Mechanistic investigations in vitro indicated that mouse neutrophil–derived NET triggered HMGB1 release and activated TLR9-dependent pathways in cancer cells to promote their adhesion, proliferation, migration, and invasion [107]. These effects can be abrogated by inhibiting NET formation in mice via DNase I treatment or inhibition of peptidyl arginine deiminase type IV (PAD4). PAD4 is an essential enzyme in NET formation that catalyzes the citrullination of histones-H3, a critical step for chromatin decondensation and expulsion [97].

2.3.3. Antitumor Properties of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps

Increasing evidence suggests that NETs play a key role in cancer; however, the antitumorigenic and the protumorigenic roles of NET formation appear to depend on various conditions. For example, NETs induced within the vasculature by systemic bacterial infection or surgical stress facilitates cancer metastasis in the liver and the lung. In contrast, neutrophils that express high CD16 and low CD62 have shown increased migratory and NET-producing capacity and this unique feature correlates with better survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [108]. These neutrophils and NETs are presumed to have destroyed the tumor cells. Based on these reports, the functions of NETs and neutrophils seem to differ based on the type of cancer or the degree of progression [109]. Further studies are needed to characterize factors that influence NET production and the difference between various forms of NETS and neutrophils.

2.3.4. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer

NETs are involved in tumor proliferation, distant metastasis, and tumor-associated thrombosis, strongly suggesting that NETs are a potential therapeutic target in cancer [109, 110]. Multiple studies have shown that DNase can digest NET formation, thereby reducing tumor proliferation, distant metastasis, and tumor-associated thrombosis [100, 102, 105107]. In human studies, PAD4 has been shown to be overexpressed in some tumors [111, 112]. Inhibiting PAD4 by using PAD4 inhibitors or PAD4 KO mice significantly reduces tumor progression [100, 107, 113115]. However, PAD4 inhibition or the use of DNase for cancer treatment in patients is still in the rudimentary stage. Additionally, it is unknown if inhibiting NET formation has a synergistic effect with current cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, molecule-targeted therapy, and immunotherapy [110]. More work is needed to investigate the relationship between NET and already established cancer treatments.

2.4. Conclusions

NE secretion and NET formation in the tumor microenvironment could be the initiators of disease or a side effect of the general overwhelming response of the immune system. There is potential for NE or NET-related molecules to be used as biomarkers and as targets for therapeutic intervention in cancer-related diseases. Although additional studies on the pathogenicity of NE and NETs in tumor microenvironment are still needed, important progress has been made to show that both NE and NETs may induce tumor proliferation, distant metastasis, and tumor-associated thrombosis (Fig. 2.2). The capacity of NE and NETs to potentiate or suppress inflammation may have a beneficial function in cancer and other pathologies. A better understanding of the function and impact of NE and NETs on health will enable the suppression of detrimental attributes without interfering with beneficial ones and ultimately, and allow us to exploit NE and NETs to treat diseases. Continued investigations into the relevance of NE and NETs in disease will reveal new functions and shed further light on the role(s) of extracellular chromatin.

Fig. 2.2.

Fig. 2.2

Neutrophil elastase and neutrophil extracellular traps can induce tumor proliferation, distant metastasis, and tumor-associated thrombosis

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the National Institute of Health, T32AI 106704-01A1 (AEO), CA214865-01 (AT) and GM095566-06 (AT).

Abbreviations

CXCL

C-X-C motif chemokine

CXCR

C-X-C chemokine receptor

DNase

Deoxyribonuclease

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

MPO

Myeloperoxidase

NE

Neutrophil elastase

NET

Neutrophil extracellular trap

PAD4

Protein arginine deiminase 4

PMA

Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate

PMN

Polymorphonuclear neutrophil

RA

Rheumatoid arthritis

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus

TAN

Tumor-associated neutrophil

TGF-β

Transforming Growth factor-β

TLR

Toll-like receptor

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest The authors have nothing to disclose.

Contributor Information

Hai Huang, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Hongji Zhang, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China.

Amblessed E. Onuma, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

Allan Tsung, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

References

  • 1.Casanova-Acebes M, Pitaval C, Weiss LA, Nombela-Arrieta C, Chevre R, AG N et al. (2013) Rhythmic modulation of the hematopoietic niche through neutrophil clearance. Cell 153(5):1025–1035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lawrence SM, Corriden R, Nizet V (2018) The ontogeny of a neutrophil: mechanisms of granulopoiesis and homeostasis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 82(1):e00057–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Borregaard N (2010) Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity 33(5):657–670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nathan C (2006) Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol 6(3):173–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A (2007) Beneficial suicide: why neutrophils die to make NETs. Nat Rev Microbiol 5(8):577–582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bainton DF, Ullyot JL, Farquhar MG (1971) The development of neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes in human bone marrow. J Exp Med 134(4):907–934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shaul ME, Fridlender ZG (2017) Neutrophils as active regulators of the immune system in the tumor microenvironment. J Leukoc Biol 102(2):343–349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu L, Saxena S, Awaji M, Singh RK (2019) Tumor-associated neutrophils in cancer: going pro. Cancers 11(4):P5641–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tecchio C, Scapini P, Pizzolo G, Cassatella MA (2013) On the cytokines produced by human neutrophils in tumors. Semin Cancer Biol 23(3):159–170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144(5):646–674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ocana A, Nieto-Jimenez C, Pandiella A, Templeton AJ (2017) Neutrophils in cancer: prognostic role and therapeutic strategies. Mol Cancer 16(1):137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Swierczak A, Mouchemore KA, Hamilton JA, Anderson RL (2015) Neutrophils: important contributors to tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 34(4):735–751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Coffelt SB, Wellenstein MD, de Visser KE (2016) Neutrophils in cancer: neutral no more. Nat Rev Cancer 16(7):431–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fridlender ZG, Sun J, Kim S, Kapoor V, Cheng G, Ling L et al. (2009) Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-beta: “N1” versus “N2” TAN. Cancer Cell 16(3):183–194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fridlender ZG, Albelda SM (2012) Tumor-associated neutrophils: friend or foe? Carcinogenesis 33(5):949–955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jamieson T, Clarke M, Steele CW, Samuel MS, Neumann J, Jung A et al. (2012) Inhibition of CXCR2 profoundly suppresses inflammation-driven and spontaneous tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest 122(9):3127–3144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Antonio N, Bonnelykke-Behrndtz ML, Ward LC, Collin J, Christensen IJ, Steiniche T et al. (2015) The wound inflammatory response exacerbates growth of pre-neoplastic cells and progression to cancer. EMBO J 34(17):2219–2236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gordon-Weeks AN, Lim SY, Yuzhalin AE, Jones K, Markelc B, Kim KJ et al. (2017) Neutrophils promote hepatic metastasis growth through fibroblast growth factor 2-dependent angiogenesis in mice. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 65(6):1920–1935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhou SL, Dai Z, Zhou ZJ, Wang XY, Yang GH, Wang Z et al. (2012) Overexpression of CXCL5 mediates neutrophil infiltration and indicates poor prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 56(6):2242–2254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wilson CL, Jurk D, Fullard N, Banks P, Page A, Luli S et al. (2015) NFkappaB1 is a suppressor of neutrophil-driven hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun 6:6818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mensurado S, Rei M, Lanca T, Ioannou M, Goncalves-Sousa N, Kubo H et al. (2018) Tumor-associated neutrophils suppress pro-tumoral IL-17+ gammadelta T cells through induction of oxidative stress. PLoS Biol 16(5):e2004990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Jupudy V, Ostberg J, Oflazoglu E, Huberman A, Repasky E et al. (2003) Neutrophils contribute to the biological antitumor activity of rituximab in a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma severe combined immunodeficiency mouse model. Clin Cancer Res 9(16 Pt 1):5866–5873 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stockmeyer B, Beyer T, Neuhuber W, Repp R, Kalden JR, Valerius T et al. (2003) Polymorphonuclear granulocytes induce antibody-dependent apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 171(10):5124–5129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Simons MP, O’Donnell MA, Griffith TS (2008) Role of neutrophils in BCG immunotherapy for bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 26(4):341–345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Challacombe JM, Suhrbier A, Parsons PG, Jones B, Hampson P, Kavanagh D et al. (2006) Neutrophils are a key component of the antitumor efficacy of topical chemotherapy with ingenol-3-angelate. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 177(11):8123–8132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Takeshima T, Pop LM, Laine A, Iyengar P, Vitetta ES, Hannan R (2016) Key role for neutrophils in radiation-induced antitumor immune responses: potentiation with G-CSF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(40):11300–11305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Otten MA, Rudolph E, Dechant M, Tuk CW, Reijmers RM, Beelen RH et al. (2005) Immature neutrophils mediate tumor cell killing via IgA but not IgG Fc receptors. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 174(9):5472–5480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lichtenstein A, Kahle J (1985) Anti-tumor effect of inflammatory neutrophils: characteristics of in vivo generation and in vitro tumor cell lysis. Int J Cancer 35(1):121–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fouret P, du Bois RM, Bernaudin JF, Takahashi H, Ferrans VJ, Crystal RG (1989) Expression of the neutrophil elastase gene during human bone marrow cell differentiation. J Exp Med 169(3):833–845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Molldrem JJ, Komanduri K, Wieder E (2002) Overexpressed differentiation antigens as targets of graft-versus-leukemia reactions. Curr Opin Hematol 9(6):503–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pulford KA, Erber WN, Crick JA, Olsson I, Micklem KJ, Gatter KC et al. (1988) Use of monoclonal antibody against human neutrophil elastase in normal and leukaemic myeloid cells. J Clin Pathol 41(8):853–860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Korkmaz B, Moreau T, Gauthier F (2008) Neutrophil elastase, proteinase 3 and cathepsin G: physicochemical properties, activity and physiopathological functions. Biochimie 90(2):227–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Papayannopoulos V, Metzler KD, Hakkim A, Zychlinsky A (2010) Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol 191(3):677–691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Belorgey D, Bieth JG (1998) Effect of polynucleotides on the inhibition of neutrophil elastase by mucus proteinase inhibitor and alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor. Biochemistry 37(46):16416–16422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Honda M, Kubes P (2018) Neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps in the liver and gastrointestinal system. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(4):206–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ruemmele FM, Targan SR, Levy G, Dubinsky M, Braun J, Seidman EG (1998) Diagnostic accuracy of serological assays in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 115(4):822–829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhou G, Song Y, Yang W, Guo Y, Fang L, Chen Y et al. (2016) ASCA, ANCA, ALCA and many more: are they useful in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease? Dig Dis (Basel, Switzerland) 34(1–2):90–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Uchiyama K, Naito Y, Takagi T, Mizushima K, Hirai Y, Hayashi N et al. (2012) Serpin B1 protects colonic epithelial cell via blockage of neutrophil elastase activity and its expression is enhanced in patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 302(10):G1163–G1170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kato S, Ochiai M, Sakurada T, Ohno S, Miyamoto K, Sagara M et al. (2008) Increased expression of long pentraxin PTX3 in inflammatory bowel diseases. Dig Dis Sci 53(7):1910–1916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Darrah E, Andrade F (2012) NETs: the missing link between cell death and systemic autoimmune diseases? Front Immunol 3:428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dale DC, Person RE, Bolyard AA, Aprikyan AG, Bos C, Bonilla MA et al. (2000) Mutations in the gene encoding neutrophil elastase in congenital and cyclic neutropenia. Blood 96(7):2317–2322 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grenda DS, Murakami M, Ghatak J, Xia J, Boxer LA, Dale D et al. (2007) Mutations of the ELA2 gene found in patients with severe congenital neutropenia induce the unfolded protein response and cellular apoptosis. Blood 110(13):4179–4187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chin AC, Lee WY, Nusrat A, Vergnolle N, Parkos CA (2008) Neutrophil-mediated activation of epithelial protease-activated receptors-1 and −2 regulates barrier function and transepithelial migration. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 181(8):5702–5710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hattar K, Oppermann S, Ankele C, Weissmann N, Schermuly RT, Bohle RM et al. (2010) c-ANCA-induced neutrophil-mediated lung injury: a model of acute Wegener’s granulomatosis. Eur Respir J 36(1):187–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Massberg S, Grahl L, von Bruehl ML, Manukyan D, Pfeiler S, Goosmann C et al. (2010) Reciprocal coupling of coagulation and innate immunity via neutrophil serine proteases. Nat Med 16(8):887–896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lerman I, Hammes SR (2018) Neutrophil elastase in the tumor microenvironment. Steroids 133:96–101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Houghton AM, Rzymkiewicz DM, Ji H, Gregory AD, Egea EE, Metz HE et al. (2010) Neutrophil elastase-mediated degradation of IRS-1 accelerates lung tumor growth. Nat Med 16(2):219–223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Caruso JA, Akli S, Pageon L, Hunt KK, Keyomarsi K (2015) The serine protease inhibitor elafin maintains normal growth control by opposing the mitogenic effects of neutrophil elastase. Oncogene 34(27):3556–3567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ho AS, Chen CH, Cheng CC, Wang CC, Lin HC, Luo TY et al. (2014) Neutrophil elastase as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in colorectal cancers. Oncotarget 5(2):473–480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gong L, Cumpian AM, Caetano MS, Ochoa CE, De la Garza MM, Lapid DJ et al. (2013) Promoting effect of neutrophils on lung tumorigenesis is mediated by CXCR2 and neutrophil elastase. Mol Cancer 12(1):154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Foekens JA, Ries C, Look MP, Gippner-Steppert C, Klijn JG, Jochum M (2003) The prognostic value of polymorphonuclear leukocyte elastase in patients with primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 63(2):337–341 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lerman I, Garcia-Hernandez ML, Rangel-Moreno J, Chiriboga L, Pan C, Nastiuk KL et al. (2017) Infiltrating myeloid cells exert protumorigenic actions via neutrophil elastase. Mol Cancer Res 15(9):1138–1152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Davis RJ, Moore EC, Clavijo PE, Friedman J, Cash H, Chen Z et al. (2017) Anti-PD-L1 efficacy can be enhanced by inhibition of myeloid-derived suppressor cells with a selective inhibitor of PI3Kdelta/gamma. Cancer Res 77(10):2607–2619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pivetta E, Danussi C, Wassermann B, Modica TM, Del Bel BL, Canzonieri V et al. (2014) Neutrophil elastase-dependent cleavage compromises the tumor suppressor role of EMILIN1. Matrix Biol 34:22–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.El Rayes T, Catena R, Lee S, Stawowczyk M, Joshi N, Fischbach C et al. (2015) Lung inflammation promotes metastasis through neutrophil protease-mediated degradation of Tsp-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(52):16000–16005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Grosse-Steffen T, Giese T, Giese N, Longerich T, Schirmacher P, Hansch GM et al. (2012) Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic tumor cell lines: the role of neutrophils and neutrophil-derived elastase. Clin Dev Immunol 2012:720768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wada Y, Yoshida K, Tsutani Y, Shigematsu H, Oeda M, Sanada Y et al. (2007) Neutrophil elastase induces cell proliferation and migration by the release of TGF-alpha, PDGF and VEGF in esophageal cell lines. Oncol Rep 17(1):161–167 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Inoue H, Kazawa T, Sato Y, Satodate H, Sasajima K, Kudo SE et al. (2004) In vivo observation of living cancer cells in the esophagus, stomach, and colon using catheter-type contact endoscope, “Endo-Cytoscopy system”. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 14(3):589–594. x–xi [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yamashita J, Ogawa M, Abe M, Hayashi N, Kurusu Y, Kawahara K et al. (1997) Tumor neutrophil elastase is closely associated with the direct extension of non-small cell lung cancer into the aorta. Chest 111(4):885–890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mittendorf EA, Alatrash G, Qiao N, Wu Y, Sukhumalchandra P, St John LS et al. (2012) Breast cancer cell uptake of the inflammatory mediator neutrophil elastase triggers an anticancer adaptive immune response. Cancer Res 72(13):3153–3162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Topic A, Ljujic M, Nikolic A, Petrovic-Stanojevic N, Dopudja-Pantic V, Mitic-Milikic M et al. (2011) Alpha-1-antitrypsin phenotypes and neutrophil elastase gene promoter polymorphisms in lung cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 17(1):75–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Foekens JA, Ries C, Look MP, Gippner-Steppert C, Klijn JG, Jochum M (2003) Elevated expression of polymorphonuclear leukocyte elastase in breast cancer tissue is associated with tamoxifen failure in patients with advanced disease. Br J Cancer 88(7):1084–1090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rotondo R, Barisione G, Mastracci L, Grossi F, Orengo AM, Costa R et al. (2009) IL-8 induces exocytosis of arginase 1 by neutrophil polymorphonuclears in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 125(4):887–893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mayadas TN, Cullere X, Lowell CA (2014) The multifaceted functions of neutrophils. Annu Rev Pathol 9:181–218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tomizawa N, Ohwada S, Ohya T, Kawashima Y, Takeyoshi I, Morishita Y (1999) The effect of neutrophil elastase inhibitor in hepatectomy with ischemia in dogs. J Surg Res 81(2):230–237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yamaguchi Y, Akizuki E, Ichiguchi O, Matsumura F, Goto M, Miyanari N et al. (1997) Neutrophil elastase inhibitor reduces neutrophil chemoattractant production after ischemia-reperfusion in rat liver. Gastroenterology 112(2):551–560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Doi K, Horiuchi T, Uchinami M, Tabo T, Kimura N, Yokomachi J et al. (2002) Neutrophil elastase inhibitor reduces hepatic metastases induced by ischaemia-reperfusion in rats. Eur J Surg Acta Chir 168(8–9):507–510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chawla A, Alatrash G, Philips AV, Qiao N, Sukhumalchandra P, Kerros C et al. (2016) Neutrophil elastase enhances antigen presentation by upregulating human leukocyte antigen class I expression on tumor cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 65(6):741–751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Aikawa N, Kawasaki Y (2014) Clinical utility of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ther Clin Risk Manag 10:621–629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Aikawa N, Ishizaka A, Hirasawa H, Shimazaki S, Yamamoto Y, Sugimoto H et al. (2011) Reevaluation of the efficacy and safety of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor, Sivelestat, for the treatment of acute lung injury associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome; a phase IV study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 24(5):549–554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Stevens T, Ekholm K, Granse M, Lindahl M, Kozma V, Jungar C et al. (2011) AZD9668: pharmacological characterization of a novel oral inhibitor of neutrophil elastase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 339(1):313–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.von Nussbaum F, Li VM, Allerheiligen S, Anlauf S, Barfacker L, Bechem M et al. (2015) Freezing the bioactive conformation to boost potency: the identification of BAY 85–8501, a selective and potent inhibitor of human neutrophil elastase for pulmonary diseases. ChemMedChem 10(7):1163–1173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS et al. (2004) Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science (New York, NY) 303(5663):1532–1535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wang Y, Li M, Stadler S, Correll S, Li P, Wang D et al. (2009) Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Cell Biol 184(2):205–213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Urban CF, Reichard U, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A (2006) Neutrophil extracellular traps capture and kill Candida albicans yeast and hyphal forms. Cell Microbiol 8(4):668–676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Saitoh T, Komano J, Saitoh Y, Misawa T, Takahama M, Kozaki T et al. (2012) Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate a host defense response to human immunodeficiency virus-1. Cell Host Microbe 12(1):109–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Abi Abdallah DS, Lin C, Ball CJ, King MR, Duhamel GE, Denkers EY (2012) Toxoplasma gondii triggers release of human and mouse neutrophil extracellular traps. Infect Immun 80(2):768–777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Walker MJ, Hollands A, Sanderson-Smith ML, Cole JN, Kirk JK, Henningham A et al. (2007) DNase Sda1 provides selection pressure for a switch to invasive group A streptococcal infection. Nat Med 13(8):981–985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Branzk N, Lubojemska A, Hardison SE, Wang Q, Gutierrez MG, Brown GD et al. (2014) Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens. Nat Immunol 15(11):1017–1025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Berthelot JM, Le Goff B, Neel A, Maugars Y, Hamidou M (2017) NETosis: at the crossroads of rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and vasculitis. Joint Bone Spine 84(3):255–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yipp BG, Kubes P (2013) NETosis: how vital is it? Blood 122(16):2784–2794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Fuchs TA, Abed U, Goosmann C, Hurwitz R, Schulze I, Wahn V et al. (2007) Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol 176(2):231–241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sollberger G, Tilley DO, Zychlinsky A (2018) Neutrophil extracellular traps: the biology of chromatin externalization. Dev Cell 44(5):542–553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Barnado A, Crofford LJ, Oates JC (2016) At the bedside: neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) as targets for biomarkers and therapies in autoimmune diseases. J Leukoc Biol 99(2):265–278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yang H, Biermann MH, Brauner JM, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Herrmann M (2016) New insights into neutrophil extracellular traps: mechanisms of formation and role in inflammation. Front Immunol 7:302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Papayannopoulos V (2018) Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 18(2):134–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hakkim A, Furnrohr BG, Amann K, Laube B, Abed UA, Brinkmann V et al. (2010) Impairment of neutrophil extracellular trap degradation is associated with lupus nephritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(21):9813–9818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pinegin B, Vorobjeva N, Pinegin V (2015) Neutrophil extracellular traps and their role in the development of chronic inflammation and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev 14(7):633–640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lood C, Blanco LP, Purmalek MM, Carmona-Rivera C, De Ravin SS, Smith CK et al. (2016) Neutrophil extracellular traps enriched in oxidized mitochondrial DNA are interferogenic and contribute to lupus-like disease. Nat Med 22(2):146–153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Warnatsch A, Ioannou M, Wang Q, Papayannopoulos V (2015) Inflammation. Neutrophil extracellular traps license macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerosis. Science (New York, NY) 349(6245):316–320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Caudrillier A, Kessenbrock K, Gilliss BM, Nguyen JX, Marques MB, Monestier M et al. (2012) Platelets induce neutrophil extracellular traps in transfusion-related acute lung injury. J Clin Invest 122(7):2661–2671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.de Jong HK, Koh GC, Achouiti A, van der Meer AJ, Bulder I, Stephan F et al. (2014) Neutrophil extracellular traps in the host defense against sepsis induced by Burkholderia pseudomallei (melioidosis). Intensive Care Med Exp 2(1):21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lee SK, Kim SD, Kook M, Lee HY, Ghim J, Choi Y et al. (2015) Phospholipase D2 drives mortality in sepsis by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular trap formation and down-regulating CXCR2. J Exp Med 212(9):1381–1390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sakurai K, Miyashita T, Okazaki M, Yamaguchi T, Ohbatake Y, Nakanuma S et al. (2017) Role for neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and platelet aggregation in early sepsis-induced hepatic dysfunction. In vivo (Athens, Greece) 31(6):1051–1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Jorch SK, Kubes P (2017) An emerging role for neutrophil extracellular traps in noninfectious disease. Nat Med 23(3):279–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wong SL, Demers M, Martinod K, Gallant M, Wang Y, Goldfine AB et al. (2015) Diabetes primes neutrophils to undergo NETosis, which impairs wound healing. Nat Med 21(7):815–819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yazdani HO, Chen HW, Tohme S, Tai S, van der Windt DJ, Loughran P et al. (2017) IL-33 exacerbates liver sterile inflammation by amplifying neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Hepatol 68(1)130–139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Huang H, Tohme S, Al-Khafaji AB, Tai S, Loughran P, Chen L et al. (2015) Damage-associated molecular pattern-activated neutrophil extracellular trap exacerbates sterile inflammatory liver injury. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 62(2):600–614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, Schatzberg D, Monestier M, Myers DD Jr et al. (2010) Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(36):15880–15885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.van der Windt DJ, Sud V, Zhang H, Varley PR, Goswami J, Yazdani HO et al. (2018) Neutrophil extracellular traps promote inflammation and development of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 68(4):1347–1360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Demers M, Krause DS, Schatzberg D, Martinod K, Voorhees JR, Fuchs TA et al. (2012) Cancers predispose neutrophils to release extracellular DNA traps that contribute to cancer-associated thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(32):13076–13081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Levi M (2016) Management of cancer-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Res 140(Suppl 1):S66–S70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Guglietta S, Chiavelli A, Zagato E, Krieg C, Gandini S, Ravenda PS et al. (2016) Coagulation induced by C3aR-dependent NETosis drives protumorigenic neutrophils during small intestinal tumorigenesis. Nat Commun 7:11037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ho-Tin-Noe B, Carbo C, Demers M, Cifuni SM, Goerge T, Wagner DD (2009) Innate immune cells induce hemorrhage in tumors during thrombocytopenia. Am J Pathol 175(4):1699–1708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Cedervall J, Zhang Y, Huang H, Zhang L, Femel J, Dimberg A et al. (2015) Neutrophil extracellular traps accumulate in peripheral blood vessels and compromise organ function in tumor-bearing animals. Cancer Res 75(13):2653–2662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Cools-Lartigue J, Spicer J, McDonald B, Gowing S, Chow S, Giannias B et al. (2013) Neutrophil extracellular traps sequester circulating tumor cells and promote metastasis. J Clin Invest 123(8):3446–3458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Tohme S, Yazdani HO, Al-Khafaji AB, Chidi AP, Loughran P, Mowen K et al. (2016) Neutrophil extracellular traps promote the development and progression of liver metastases after surgical stress. Cancer Res 76(6):1367–1380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Millrud CR, Kagedal A, Kumlien Georen S, Winqvist O, Uddman R, Razavi R et al. (2017) NET-producing CD16(high) CD62L(dim) neutrophils migrate to tumor sites and predict improved survival in patients with HNSCC. Int J Cancer 140(11):2557–2567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cedervall J, Olsson AK (2016) Immunity gone astray – NETs in cancer. Trends Cancer 2(11):633–634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zhang LM, Chen JH (2015) Progression of NETs correlating with tumor-related diseases. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16(17):7431–7434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Chang X, Han J (2006) Expression of peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (PAD4) in various tumors. Mol Carcinog 45(3):183–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Chang X, Han J, Pang L, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Shen Z (2009) Increased PADI4 expression in blood and tissues of patients with malignant tumors. BMC Cancer 9:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Li P, Li M, Lindberg MR, Kennett MJ, Xiong N, Wang Y (2010) PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med 207(9):1853–1862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Li P, Wang D, Yao H, Doret P, Hao G, Shen Q et al. (2010) Coordination of PAD4 and HDAC2 in the regulation of p53-target gene expression. Oncogene 29(21):3153–3162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Li P, Yao H, Zhang Z, Li M, Luo Y, Thompson PR et al. (2008) Regulation of p53 target gene expression by peptidylarginine deiminase 4. Mol Cell Biol 28(15):4745–4758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES