Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2025 Mar;87(3):302–313. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.013

Recent Patterns and Trends in Global Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: An Update

Elizabeth J Schafer a,⁎, Mathieu Laversanne b, Hyuna Sung a, Isabelle Soerjomataram b, Alberto Briganti c,d, William Dahut e, Freddie Bray b, Ahmedin Jemal a
PMCID: PMC11862828  PMID: 39668103

Take Home Message

Increasing trends for prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in many countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean probably reflect an increase in detection (incidence) and limited access to and availability of treatment (mortality).

Keywords: Global prostate cancer, Incidence rates, Mortality rates, Trends

Abstract

Background and objective

Our aim was to examine worldwide patterns and trends for prostate cancer (PC) incidence and mortality using high-quality, up-to-date, population-based data.

Methods

We analyzed age-standardized PC incidence and mortality rates by country and region from the 2022 GLOBOCAN estimates and temporal trends in incidence (50 countries/territories) and mortality (59 countries/territories) rates using data from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents series and the World Health Organization mortality database.

Key findings and limitations

Estimated PC rates across regions in 2022 varied 13-fold for incidence and 9.5-fold for mortality. The highest incidence rates were in Australia/New Zealand, North America, Northern Europe, and Latin America/Caribbean. The highest mortality rates were in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America/Caribbean. During the most recent 5-yr period, incidence rates increased in 11 of the 50 countries included in the study and mortality rates increased in nine of 59 countries, mostly located in Africa, Asia, Latin America/Caribbean, and Central and Eastern Europe. Mortality rates decreased in 38 countries, largely located in Europe, Oceania, and Latin America/Caribbean. Limitations include the lack of data for low- and middle-income countries.

Conclusions and clinical implications

The increase in PC incidence and mortality rates in many countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America/Caribbean may be because of increases in detection (incidence) and limited access to and availability of treatments (mortality only). The findings reinforce the importance of improving the health care infrastructure in these countries to mitigate the rising burden of PC.


ADVANCING PRACTICE.

What does this study add?

This study provides the most recent 2022 GLOBOCAN estimates of prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates for 185 countries or territories, and temporal trends for incidence (50 countries/territories) and mortality (59 countries/territories) rates on the basis of high-quality, population-based data. Prostate cancer incidence rates increased in 11 countries and mortality rates increased in nine countries, located in Africa, Asia, and Latin America/Caribbean, reinforcing the need to expand access to care in these countries.

Clinical Relevance

This article highlights the significant global disparities in prostate cancer incidence and mortality, emphasizing the role of healthcare access, genetic factors, and screening practices in shaping these outcomes. Regions like Northern Europe, North America, and Australia report the highest incidence rates, largely due to the widespread use of PSA-based testing for early detection. In contrast, mortality rates are most severe in Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, where individuals of African ancestry, genetically more predisposed to prostate cancer, face limited access to timely diagnosis and treatment. Over the past five years, a troubling increase in incidence and mortality has been observed in countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Europe, highlighting the urgent need for region-specific healthcare interventions. These findings strongly advocate for improving access to early detection and treatment in low- and middle-income countries, where healthcare inequities remain a major barrier to reducing prostate cancer burden. Equally important is addressing gaps in data availability and quality, particularly in regions like Africa and Asia, where underreporting limits our understanding and ability to address these disparities. Additionally, the article notes the lack of analysis on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on prostate cancer outcomes, leaving a critical area unexplored. By prioritizing better data collection and investing in equitable healthcare infrastructure, we can reduce these disparities and make early detection and treatment universally accessible, not just a privilege. Associate Editor: Gianluca Giannarini, MD.

Patient Summary

We examined worldwide patterns and trends for prostate cancer incidence (50 countries) and mortality (59 countries) rates using up-to-date population-based data. Prostate cancer incidence rates increased in 11 countries and mortality rates increased in nine countries, located in Africa, Asia, and Latin America/Caribbean. The results highlight the need to expand access to care in these countries.

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death among men worldwide, with more than 1 460 000 estimated cases and 396 000 deaths in 2022 [1]. It is predicted that by 2040, the PC burden will have increased to approximately 2.4 million cases and 712 000 deaths solely because of the aging and growing global population [2]. This increase in mortality translates to approximately 7.5 million life-years lost, with Africa, Asia, and Latin America/Caribbean experiencing the steepest increase in predicted life-years lost [3].

Previous studies of trends in international PC incidence and mortality rates [4], [5] are based on data up to 2016. There have been recent changes in early detection recommendations in many countries [6], [7], as well as improvements in treatment [8] and an increase in the number of countries covered by high-quality population-based cancer registries [9]. Here we examine global patterns and time trends for PC incidence and mortality using incidence data from population-based cancer registries worldwide up to 2021, and national mortality data from vital registration systems up to 2022.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Data sources

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) GLOBOCAN 2022 estimates were obtained from the Global Cancer Observatory (https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/en) and used to describe PC incidence and mortality (International Classification of Disease-10 code C61) estimated for 185 countries or territories, covering approximately 98% of the global population. The country-specific methods for estimation depend on the coverage, timeliness, and accuracy of the incidence and mortality data recorded in each country [10].

PC incidence data for 50 countries/territories with at least 10 yr of data available between 1980 and 2021 were obtained from the IARC Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Plus (CI5plus) database, a quinquennial series of high-quality population-based cancer registry data at the national or subnational level that covers approximately 5% of the global population [9], [11]. Inclusion in CI5 volumes is based on the data quality of each registry over time, which is assessed in terms of the comparability, completeness, and validity of the data submitted. Incidence data for the USA were supplemented with more recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results 8 (SEER-8) registry database, representing approximately 8% of the US population, to examine incidence rates for Black and White men separately because of known racial disparities [12]. Cancer mortality data between 1980 and 2022 for 59 countries/territories were obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO) mortality database as compiled by IARC, representing approximately 22% of the global population. The quality of these data, which is measured according to coverage and completeness, varies across countries [13].

Long-term PC incidence trends are presented for 50 countries/territories, and long-term PC mortality trends for 59 countries/territories. However, the recorded rates include White and Black men in the USA, yielding 52 populations for incidence and 61 populations for mortality.

2.2. Statistical analysis

All incidence and mortality rates were age-standardized to the 1966 Segi-Doll world standard population using the direct method [14], [15]. Secular trends in age-standardized rates were visualized and quantified using Joinpoint regression by estimating the annual percentage change (APC), allowing a maximum of four joinpoints. A weighted average of the APC (AAPC) was also calculated for the most recent 5-yr period, with weights based on the length of each APC interval. Trends were described as increasing or decreasing when the APC or AAPC was statistically significant according to a two-sided p value <0.05, or otherwise as stable. Analyses were performed with R v4.3.3, Rcan v1.3.82, and Joinpoint v3.53.

3. Results

3.1. Estimated PC incidence and mortality rates for 2022 across 21 world regions and 185 countries

In 2022, PC incidence and mortality rates varied approximately 13-fold and 9.5-fold, respectively, across world areas (Table 1). Northern Europe had the highest estimated incidence rate (82.8 per 100 000 men) and Southern Africa had the highest mortality rate (29.7 per 100 000 men). South-Central Asia had the lowest rates for both incidence (6.4 per 100 000 men) and mortality (3.1 per 100 000 men). At the country level, the highest incidence rates were found in Australia, New Zealand, the USA, Brazil, and several countries in the Caribbean and Northern Europe (Fig. 1). By contrast, mortality rates were highest in many sub-Saharan African and Caribbean countries, such as Barbados, Jamaica, and Chad, and were lowest across Asia (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Estimated number of new prostate cancer cases and deaths by world region for 2022 a

Area Population size
Cases
Deaths
N % N % ASR N % ASR
Africa 703 122 445 103 050 30.3 55 744 17.3
Eastern Africa 232 760 186 33.1 25 431 24.7 28.0 14 808 26.6 16.8
Middle Africa 95 067 662 13.5 16 011 15.5 44.2 9401 16.9 27.2
Northern Africa 128 138 567 18.2 16 686 16.2 16.1 6958 12.5 6.9
Southern Africa 34 025 573 4.8 13 691 13.3 59.9 5790 10.4 29.7
Western Africa 213 130 457 30.3 31 231 30.3 36.9 18 787 33.7 23.5
Asia 2 374 486 911 386 424 12.6 120 485 3.8
Eastern Asia 822 363 685 34.6 255 404 66.1 15.1 64 618 53.6 3.5
South-Central Asia 1 060 915 547 44.7 60 131 15.6 6.4 29 194 24.2 3.1
South-Eastern Asia 340 253 165 14.3 42 298 10.9 12.7 17 443 14.5 5.3
Western Asia 150 954 514 6.4 28 591 7.4 24.0 9230 7.7 7.9
Europe 361 242 024 473 011 59.9 115 182 11.2
Eastern Europe 137 314 603 38.0 122 189 25.8 48.8 36 407 31.6 13.5
Northern Europe 52 963 352 14.7 95 448 20.2 82.8 21 232 18.4 12.4
Southern Europe 74 143 121 20.5 96 952 20.5 54.4 22 182 19.3 8.1
Western Europe 96 820 948 26.8 158 422 33.5 65.7 35 361 30.7 10.2
Latin America/Caribbean 327 201 180 225 985 58.0 61 056 13.9
Caribbean 21 727 133 6.6 22 271 9.9 73.9 9695 15.9 26.4
Central America 90 053 341 27.5 35 982 15.9 39.8 10 311 16.9 10.2
South America 215 420 706 65.8 167 732 74.2 62.4 41 050 67.2 13.7
North America 184 781 027 255 782 73.5 39 605 8.3
Oceania 21 902 160 23 602 71.9 5358 11.5
Australia/New Zealand 15 386 803 70.3 21 982 93.1 78.1 4818 89.9 11.0
Melanesia 5 881 650 26.9 1286 5.4 34.3 431 8.0 14.4
Micronesia 282 593 1.3 117 0.5 43.3 37 0.7 15.4
Polynesia 351 114 1.6 217 0.9 58.9 72 1.3 19.7
World 3 972 735 747 1 467 854 29.4 397 430 7.3

ASR = age-standardized world rate per 100 000 men.

a

Percentages shown for the population, cases, and deaths are within each region. Source: GLOBOCAN 2022.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Estimated age-standardized (A) prostate cancer incidence and (B) prostate cancer mortality rates in 2022. ASR = age-standardized rate; IARC = International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Source: GLOBOCAN 2022.

3.2. Patterns in recorded incidence and mortality rates for the last 5 yr of available data

Fig. 2, Fig. 3 illustrate PC incidence and mortality rates recorded during the most recent 5-yr period with data available from 52 and 61 populations, respectively. Incidence rates per 100 000 men varied approximately 22-fold across countries, from 7.6 in Thailand to 168.0 in Martinique. Mortality rates per 100 000 men varied approximately ninefold, ranging from 2.9 in Malaysia to more than 24.0 in Cuba and Venezuela. In general, countries in Asia had the lowest incidence and mortality rates, while countries with a higher proportion of men of African ancestry (sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean) and some Eastern European countries (eg, Lithuania and Estonia) had the highest incidence and mortality rates.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Prostate cancer incidence rates in selected countries. a Rates are from 2011–2015. b Rates are from 2012–2016. c Rates are from 2013–2017. d Rates are from 2015–2019. e Rates are from 2017–2021.

Source: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents; Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Prostate cancer mortality rates in selected countries. a Rates are from 2012–2016. b Rates are from 2014–2018. c Rates are from 2015–2019. d Rates are from 2016–2020. e Rates are from 2017–2021. f Rates are from 2018–2022.

Source: World Health Organization mortality database.

3.3. Trends in incidence and mortality rates

Figure 4 shows long-term trends for PC incidence and mortality rates, with the observed rates overlaid by linear segments from Joinpoint models for selected countries. APCs for each segment identified by the model and AAPCs for the latest 5-yr are presented in Supplementary Table 1 for incidence and in Supplementary Table 2 for mortality. In most countries, incidence rates generally increased at the beginning of the study period and then stabilized or decreased around the late 2000s (Supplementary Table 1). By contrast, five countries in Europe and North America (Austria, France, Iceland, Canada, and the USA) experienced increasing or stable incidence rates from the mid-2010s following declines. Trends in 5-yr AAPC significantly increased in 11 of the 50 countries examined, with increases ranging from 0.7% per year in Scotland (2013–2017) to 10.0% per year in Poland (2013–2017). By contrast, incidence rates decreased in 15 countries, with decreases ranging from 0.7% per year in New Zealand (2013–2017) to 6.2% per year in Israel (2013–2017). Incidence rates were stable in the remaining 24 countries.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates for selected countries. Blue represents incidence and red represents mortality. Dots represent observed rates and lines represent fitted values based on joinpoint analyses.

Source: Incidence: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Mortality: World Health Organization mortality database.

Long-term trends in mortality rates generally decreased or stabilized during the 1990s in many countries following increasing trends (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2). However, the pace of the decline slowed or the trend stabilized in 12 of these countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, Colombia, France, Greece, Italy, Israel, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, and the USA) since the early 2010s, except in Mexico and the Netherlands, where rates stabilized in 2019. During the most recent 5-yr period, mortality rates decreased in 38 of the 59 countries, with the decrease ranging from 0.6% per year in Hungary (2018–2022) to 7.8% per year in Estonia (2018–2022). Mortality rates increased in nine countries, with the increase ranging from 0.5% per year in the Philippines (2015–2019) to 7.9% per year in Guatemala (2017–2021), and were stable in the remaining 12 countries.

Figure 5 shows recent trends in PC incidence and mortality rates for the 34 countries for which both incidence and mortality data were available. Rates decreased for both incidence and mortality in 12 countries. By contrast, incidence rates increased while mortality rates remained stable (Austria, Latvia, Poland, and the USA) or decreased (Croatia and Scotland) in six countries. Below we describe the trends in incidence and mortality rates by region and country.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Average annual percent change in incidence and mortality rates for the last 5-yr of available data for selected countries. AAPC = average annual percent change. *The AAPC is statistically significantly different from zero.

Source: Incidence: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Mortality: World Health Organization.

3.3.1. Africa

The incidence rate in Uganda was 53.0 per 100 000 men, and rates have been increasing by 2.3% per year since 1993 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1). South Africa had the fourth highest mortality rate among all countries included in the study at 20.3 per 100 000 men, and rates have been increasing by 1.6% per year since 1996 (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 2).

3.3.2. Asia

Countries throughout Asia had some of the lowest incidence (7.6 to 41.7 per 100 000) and mortality (2.9 to 11.9 per 100 000) rates during the most recent 5-yr period (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). Incidence rates during the latest 5-yr period continued to increase by approximately 4.0–5.0% per year in China, India, and Thailand, decreased by 2.2–6.2% per year in Turkey and Israel, and remained stable in Bahrain, Philippines, Republic of Korea, and Qatar (Supplementary Table 1). However, incidence rates recently stabilized in Japan and Kuwait after increasing up to the early 2010s. By contrast, mortality rates during the most recent 5-yr period increased by 0.5% per year in the Philippines, decreased by 1.5–5.2% per year in Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Armenia, and were stable in the remaining countries (Supplementary Table 2).

3.3.3. Central and Eastern Europe

Incidence rates in Central and Eastern Europe ranged from 50.4 to 71.8 per 100 000 men (Fig. 2), while mortality rates ranged from 10.3 to 14.2 per 100 000 (Fig. 3). During the most recent 5-yr period, incidence rates increased in Belarus (4.4% per year) and Poland (10.0% per year) and remained stable in Czechia (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 1). By contrast, mortality rates decreased by approximately 1.0–3.0% per year in Hungary, Czechia, and Slovakia, increased by approximately 1.0–5.0% per year in Romania, Bulgaria, and Moldova, and were stable in Poland (Supplementary Table 2).

3.3.4. Northern Europe

In Northern Europe, incidence rates varied twofold across the 13 countries included in the study, from 63.4 per 100 000 men in Scotland to 128.6 in Lithuania, the third highest rate among all countries (Fig. 2). Similarly, mortality rates varied approximately twofold across the 11 countries, with the highest rate in Latvia at 20.8 per 100 000 men, the third highest rate among all populations (Fig. 3). Incidence rates during the most recent 5-yr period continued to increase by 4.0% annually in Latvia and by 0.7% per year in Scotland, decreased by approximately 1.0–2.0% per year in five countries (Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Norway, and Sweden), and were stable in the remaining countries (Supplementary Table 1). By contrast, mortality rates during the most recent 5-yr period decreased by approximately 1.0–8.0% per year for all 11 Northern European countries except for Latvia, where the rate remained stable (Supplementary Table 2).

3.3.5. Southern Europe

Across Southern Europe, incidence rates per 100 000 men ranged from 47.3 in Malta to 79.5 in Slovenia, while mortality rates per 100 000 men ranged from 6.9 in Italy to 15.5 in Slovenia (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). During the most recent 5-yr period, incidence rates increased by 9.2% per year in Croatia, decreased by 3.1% per year in Spain, and remained stable in Cyprus, Italy, Malta, and Slovenia. By contrast, mortality rates decreased by approximately 1.0–2.0% per year in all countries except North Macedonia, where the rate remained stable (Supplementary Table 2).

3.3.6. Western Europe

Incidence rates per 100 000 men ranged from 61.4 in Austria to 84.5 in France, while mortality rates per 100 000 men ranged from 8.7 in France to 11.2 in the Netherlands (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). During the most recent 5-yr period, incidence rates decreased by approximately 2.0% per year in Germany and the Netherlands and remained stable in Switzerland. However, incidence rates increased by 3.6% per year in Austria and stabilized in France, a change from the previously declining trends (Supplementary Table 1). Mortality rates continued to decrease by approximately 1.0–3.0% per year in Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, and France, and stabilized in Austria and the Netherlands (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 2).

3.3.7. Latin America and the Caribbean

Incidence rates per 100 000 men varied more than fourfold across the seven countries located in Latin America and the Caribbean, ranging from 38.2 in Argentina to 168.0 in Martinique (Fig. 2). Mortality rates per 100 000 men ranged from 9.3 in Puerto Rico to 25.8 in Cuba (Fig. 3). The region encompasses four of the top ten populations with the highest mortality rates in the study (Cuba, Venezuela, Uruguay, and Paraguay). During the most recent 5-yr period, incidence rates continued to decrease by approximately 1.0% per year in Argentina, Colombia, and Puerto Rico, and were stable in the four remaining countries (Supplementary Table 1). Mortality rates during the most recent 5-yr period decreased by approximately 1.0–4.0% per year in eight of the 14 countries examined, increased by approximately 1.0–8.0% per year in Venezuela, Paraguay, Cuba, and Guatemala, and were stable in Mexico and Nicaragua (Supplementary Table 2).

3.3.8. North America

Incidence rates per 100 000 men were 79.3 in the USA and 64.9 in Canada. Mortality rates were relatively similar between Canada and the USA, at 8.7 and 8.3 per 100 000 men, respectively. Black men in the USA had the second highest incidence rate among all men included in the study at 136.9 per 100 000 men and had a 77% higher incidence rate and a 120% higher mortality rate in comparison to White men (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). During the most recent 5-yr period, the incidence rate increased by 4.2% per year in the USA and stabilized in Canada after rapidly declining in the previous decade (Supplementary Table 1). By contrast, the mortality rate during the most recent 5-yr period continued to decline in Canada, albeit at a slower pace, and stabilized in the USA following two decades of steady decline (Supplementary Table 2).

3.3.9. Oceania

Australia and New Zealand had the sixth (97.1 per 100 000 men) and tenth (88.1 per 100 000 men) highest incidence rates, respectively, among all men included in the study. The incidence rate decreased by 3.8% per year in Australia since 2008 and by 0.7% per year in New Zealand since 1995 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1). Similarly, the mortality rate has decreased by 1.0% per year in Australia since 2014 and by 2.7% per year in New Zealand since 1997(Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 2).

4. Discussion

The estimated PC incidence rates in 2022 were highest in North America, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, and in many Northern European countries, probably reflecting higher uptake of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based testing in these countries [8], [16]. By contrast, mortality rates were highest in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America/Caribbean, largely because of the higher proportion of individuals of African ancestry, who are genetically more susceptible to developing PC, and the limited availability of early detection and treatment services [17]. During the most recent 5-yr period, incidence rates increased in 11 countries and mortality rates increased in nine, largely confined to countries within Africa, parts of Asia, Latin America/Caribbean, and Europe. In most countries, however, incidence and mortality rates decreased or stabilized.

In general, trends in PC incidence in many high-income countries follow trends in PSA-based screening, with the incidence rate rising when PSA-based screening uptake increases and falling when it decreases [18], [19]. For example, the decline in the PC incidence rate since 2008 in Australia coincided with the fall in PSA-based screening prevalence beginning in the same year among men aged 45–84 yr [18]. In addition to declines in PSA-based screening uptake, increased use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to reduce overdiagnosis [20] may have contributed to the recent decrease in incidence rate in some countries. For example, in Sweden, where incidence rates are decreasing, the STHLM3-MRI trial found that incorporation of mpMRI in the diagnostic pathway reduced diagnosis of clinically insignificant tumors by 64% and benign findings on biopsy by 74% among men biopsied after a positive MRI test in comparison to men who underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy for elevated PSA [21]. Over the past few years, many national or regional organizations, including the European Association of Urology [22] and the American Urological Association [23], [24], updated their guidelines on early PC diagnosis to recommend mpMRI before prostate biopsy to decrease the number of clinically insignificant PC diagnoses at biopsy.

Incidence rates increased in 11 of the 50 countries examined, including Uganda, the USA, and several countries in Asia and Europe. Such trends may in part reflect increases in incidental detection of tumors via transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for lower urinary tract syndrome and benign prostatic hyperplasia [25], [26], [27], greater awareness of the disease [8], [28], and opportunistic PSA testing [29], [30]. A 2022 meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of incidental PC following TURP was higher in Africa (22.0%) and Asia (9.0%) than in North America (1.0%) [31]. The rising prevalence of potential risk factors such as obesity, which is associated with advanced-stage disease [32], and a Western diet [32], [33] may have also contributed to the rising incidence of PC. The increase in PC incidence rate since the mid-2010s in the USA, largely driven by advanced-stage disease, was not preceded by a marked increase in PSA-based screening practices [34]. Further studies are needed to elucidate reasons underlying this rising trend.

The declining trend for mortality rates in many countries throughout Europe, North America, Oceania, and Latin America/Caribbean are probably the result of improvements in early detection of advanced-stage cancer [8], [35] and in treatments [8], [36]. Previous model-based studies estimated that PSA-based screening accounted for 45–70% of the decline in the PC mortality rate in the USA [37], and improvements in treatments for 22–33% of the decline by 2005 [36]. A 2021 study in Lithuania, where a nationwide PSA-based PC screening program in 2006, found that among individuals diagnosed with PC, the PC-specific standardized mortality risk ratio was higher for who did not participate in the national screening program (20.95, 95% CI 20.00–21.94) than for those who did (8.99, 95% CI 8.63–9.37) [38].

In contrast to the declining or stabilizing mortality trends in the majority of the 59 countries included in the study, rates increased in nine countries, including South Africa, the Philippines, Cuba, Moldova, Bulgaria, and Guatemala. These increasing mortality trends may reflect increasing incidence as well as limited availability of high-quality early detection and treatment services [39]. For example, according to WHO, there are fewer than three radiotherapy machines per million population in South Africa and Cuba, compared to more than 10 machines per million population in the USA, Germany, and Sweden [40], [41], [42]. Only 28% of PC patients survive for 5 yr in South Africa, compared to more than 90% in high-income countries such as the USA (97.0%) [41], France (93.1%) [43], and Australia (94.5%) [44], where early detection and treatment services are more accessible.

The strengths of this study include the use of high-quality, up-to-date, population-based data to comprehensively examine geographic patterns in PC incidence and mortality rates across five continents [9]. The study limitations include subnational coverage in 23 of 50 countries examined for incidence and three of the 59 countries examined for mortality, limiting the degree of national representativeness of the trends, with under-representation of countries in both incidence and mortality data, particularly in Africa and Asia. Furthermore, we could not examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PC rates and trends owing to the lack of post-COVID-19 data. Future studies should examine the impact of delays in cancer diagnosis and treatment during the COIVD-19 pandemic on PC incidence, survival, and mortality across countries.

5. Conclusions

Our analysis of high-quality population-based data across the five continents revealed that PC incidence and mortality rates decreased or were stable in the majority of countries examined. However, increasing trends were found in a few countries located in Africa, Asia, Latin America/Caribbean, and Central and Eastern Europe, possibly because of an increase in detection (incidence) and limited access to and the availability of treatments (mortality only). These findings reinforce the need for improvements in access to early detection and treatment services to mitigate the undue high burden of the disease in these countries. Furthermore, improvements in data availability and quality, particularly in low- and middle- income countries in Asia and Africa, will enhance our understanding of current disparities and prioritization of early detection and treatment approaches.



Author contributions: Elizabeth J. Schafer had full access to the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.



Study concept and design: Jemal, Schafer.

Acquisition of data: Laversanne.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Laversanne, Jemal, Schafer.

Drafting of the manuscript: Schafer, Jemal

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Laversanne.

Obtaining funding: None.

Administrative, technical, or material support: None.

Supervision: Jemal.

Other: None.



Financial disclosures: Elizabeth Schafer certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: None.



Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: None.



Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge all the cancer registries and their staff for their hard work and diligence in collecting cancer information, without which this research would not have been possible.



Data sharing statement: Data used in this analysis are deidentified and publicly available on the IARC Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Plus database (https://ci5.iarc.who.int), the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute (https://seer.cancer.gov/data/access.html), and the World Health Organization mortality database (https://www.who.int/data/data-collection-tools/who-mortality-database).

Associate Editor: Gianluca Giannarini, MD

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.013.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary Data 1
mmc1.docx (54KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferlay J., Laversanne M., Ervik M., et al. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2020. Global Cancer Observatory: cancer tomorrow. https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Withrow D., Pilleron S., Nikita N., et al. Current and projected number of years of life lost due to prostate cancer: a global study. Prostate. 2022;82:1088–1097. doi: 10.1002/pros.24360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Culp M.B., Soerjomataram I., Efstathiou J.A., Bray F., Jemal A. Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2020;77:38–52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wong M.C., Goggins W.B., Wang H.H., et al. Global incidence and mortality for prostate cancer: analysis of temporal patterns and trends in 36 countries. Eur Urol. 2016;70:862–874. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grossman D.C., Curry S.J., Owens D.K., et al. Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;319:1901–1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parker C., Castro E., Fizazi K., et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1119–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.James N.D., Tannock I., N’Dow J., et al. The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases. Lancet. 2024;403:1683–11622. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00651-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bray F, Colombet M, Aitken JF, et al, editors. Cancer incidence in five continents, volume XII. IARC CancerBase no. 1Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2023. https://ci5.iarc.who.int.
  • 10.Ferlay J., Colombet M., Soerjomataram I., et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2020: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1941–1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. PMID:30350310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ferlay J, Colombet M, Laversanne M, Bray F. CI5plus: cancer incidence in five continents time trends. IARC CancerBase no. 9. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2023. https://ci5.iarc.who.int/ci5plus/.
  • 12.Giaquinto A.N., Miller K.D., Tossas K.Y., Winn R.A., Jemal A., Siegel R.L. Cancer statistics for African American/Black people 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:202–229. doi: 10.3322/caac.21718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2018. World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Doll R, Payne P, Waterhouse J, editors. Cancer incidence in five continents – a technical report. ed. 1. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1966.
  • 15.Segi M. Department of Public Health, Tohoku University of Medicine; Sendai, Japan: 1960. Cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries (1950–57) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sierra M.S., Soerjomataram I., Forman D. Prostate cancer burden in Central and South America. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;44(Suppl 1):S131–S140. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Conti D.V., Darst B.F., Moss L.C., et al. Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction. Nat Genet. 2021;53:65–75. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00748-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pathirana T., Sequeira R., Del Mar C., et al. Trends in prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing and prostate cancer incidence and mortality in Australia: a critical analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2022;77 doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smith D.P., Supramaniam R., Marshall V.R., Armstrong B.K. Prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen testing in New South Wales. Med J Aust. 2008;189:315–318. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fazekas T., Shim S.R., Basile G., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10:745–754. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eklund M., Jäderling F., Discacciati A., et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy in prostate cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:908–920. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cornford P., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E., et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—2024 update. Part I: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2024;86:148–163. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bjurlin M.A., Carroll P.R., Eggener S., et al. Update of the standard operating procedure on the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis, staging and management of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2020;203:706–712. doi: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wei J.T., Barocas D., Carlsson S., et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline part I: prostate cancer screening. J Urol. 2023;210:46–53. doi: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guo R., Yu W., Zhang K., Xu B. Impact of changing trends in medical therapy on transurethral resection of the prostate: two decades of change in China. Urology. 2016;92:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jang D.G., Yoo C., Oh C.Y., et al. Current status of transurethral prostatectomy: a Korean multicenter study. Korean J Urol. 2011;52:406–409. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.6.406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bukirwa P., Wabinga H., Nambooze S., et al. Trends in the incidence of cancer in Kampala, Uganda, 1991 to 2015. Int J Cancer. 2021;148:2129–2138. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Asasira J., Lee S., Tran T.X.M., et al. Infection-related and lifestyle-related cancer burden in Kampala, Uganda: projection of the future cancer incidence up to 2030. BMJ Open. 2022;12 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Clift A.K., Coupland C.A., Hippisley-Cox J. Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening: a cohort study in England, 1998–2017. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71:e157–e165. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Beyer K., Leenen R., Venderbos L.D.F., et al. Health policy for prostate cancer early detection in the European Union and the impact of opportunistic screening: PRAISE-U Consortium. J Pers Med. 2024;14:84. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Guo Z., He J., Huang L., et al. Prevalence and risk factors of incidental prostate cancer in certain surgeries for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48:915–929. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.Ibju.2021.0653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bergengren O., Pekala K.R., Matsoukas K., et al. 2022 update on prostate cancer epidemiology and risk factors—a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2023;84:191–206. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fabiani R., Minelli L., Bertarelli G., Bacci S. A Western dietary pattern increases prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2016;8:626. doi: 10.3390/nu8100626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schafer E.J., Jemal A., Wiese D., et al. Disparities and trends in genitourinary cancer incidence and mortality in the USA. Eur Urol. 2023;84:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Marhold M., Kramer G., Krainer M., Le Magnen C. The prostate cancer landscape in Europe: current challenges, future opportunities. Cancer Lett. 2022;526:304–310. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Etzioni R., Gulati R., Tsodikov A., et al. The prostate cancer conundrum revisited: treatment changes and prostate cancer mortality declines. Cancer. 2012;118:5955–5963. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Etzioni R., Tsodikov A., Mariotto A., et al. Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:175–181. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9083-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Patasius A., Smailyte G. All-cause mortality risk in national prostate cancer cohort: an impact of population-based prostate cancer screening. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2459. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Davies L., Milner D.A., Jr, Shulman L.N., et al. Analysis of cancer research projects in sub-Saharan Africa: a quantitative perspective on unmet needs and opportunities. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023;9 doi: 10.1200/go.22.00203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States cancer statistics: data visualizations. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dataviz.
  • 41.Seraphin T.P., Joko-Fru W.Y., Manraj S.S., et al. Prostate cancer survival in sub-Saharan Africa by age, stage at diagnosis, and human development index: a population-based registry study. Cancer Causes Control. 2021;32:1001–1019. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01453-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2022. Global atlas of medical devices 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Siegel R.L., Giaquinto A.N., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:12–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Allemani C., Matsuda T., Di Carlo V., et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391:1023–1075. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)33326-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data 1
mmc1.docx (54KB, docx)

RESOURCES