Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1999 Mar;229(3):362–368. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199903000-00009

Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

F Prat 1, B Meduri 1, B Ducot 1, R Chiche 1, R Salimbeni-Bartolini 1, G Pelletier 1
PMCID: PMC1191701  PMID: 10077048

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define accurate and useful predictors of common bile duct stones (CBDS). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The ability to predict CBDS with noninvasive tests can avoid unnecessary, costly, or risky procedures. METHODS: All patients referred for examination for CBDS by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) from 1993-1996 were prospectively entered in a database. In a first sample selected randomly from the whole population, predictors of CBDS were determined by univariate analysis and logistic regression. Predictors were subsequently tested in that sample and in the rest of the population. A separate analysis was done for patients planned for cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Eight hundred and eighty patients (328 men, 552 women), aged 57.8 +/- 17 years (range 16-94), were included. The prevalence of CBDS was 18.8%. Age, serum levels of bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and alkaline phosphatase, and the existence of jaundice and fever, a dilated bile duct, and a pathologic gallbladder were found to be associated with CBDS. Logistic regression was undertaken separately for patients younger than 70 years (predictors: GGT >7 x normal; pathologic gallbladder; dilated bile duct) and older than 70 years (predictors: GGT >7 x normal; fever > 38 degrees C; dilated bile duct). Odds ratios were 3 to 6.7. The model was satisfactorily applicable to the second sample; age <70 years: chi2 = 3.3 (NS); age >70 years: chi2 = 3.8 (NS). In patients younger than age 70 and planned for cholecystectomy, the combination of the level of GGT and dilated bile duct predicted CBDS accurately. CONCLUSIONS: A simple screening of patients at risk for CBDS can be achieved with three predictive criteria adapted for the patient's age.

Full text

PDF
362

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abboud P. A., Malet P. F., Berlin J. A., Staroscik R., Cabana M. D., Clarke J. R., Shea J. A., Schwartz J. S., Williams S. V. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Oct;44(4):450–455. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70098-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amouyal P., Amouyal G., Lévy P., Tuzet S., Palazzo L., Vilgrain V., Gayet B., Belghiti J., Fékété F., Bernades P. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1994 Apr;106(4):1062–1067. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90768-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anciaux M. L., Pelletier G., Attali P., Meduri B., Liguory C., Etienne J. P. Prospective study of clinical and biochemical features of symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Dig Dis Sci. 1986 May;31(5):449–453. doi: 10.1007/BF01320306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbara L., Sama C., Morselli Labate A. M., Taroni F., Rusticali A. G., Festi D., Sapio C., Roda E., Banterle C., Puci A. A population study on the prevalence of gallstone disease: the Sirmione Study. Hepatology. 1987 Sep-Oct;7(5):913–917. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840070520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barkun A. N., Barkun J. S., Fried G. M., Ghitulescu G., Steinmetz O., Pham C., Meakins J. L., Goresky C. A. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Ann Surg. 1994 Jul;220(1):32–39. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199407000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Canto M. I., Chak A., Stellato T., Sivak M. V., Jr Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jun;47(6):439–448. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70242-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cotton P. B., Baillie J., Pappas T. N., Meyers W. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the biliary endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Jan-Feb;37(1):94–97. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70637-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidson B. R., Neoptolemos J. P., Carr-Locke D. L. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gall bladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut. 1988 Jan;29(1):114–120. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.1.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldman D. E., Gholson C. F. Choledocholithiasis in patients with normal serum liver enzymes. Dig Dis Sci. 1995 May;40(5):1065–1068. doi: 10.1007/BF02064200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839–843. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hauer-Jensen M., Karesen R., Nygaard K., Solheim K., Amlie E. J., Havig O., Rosseland A. R. Prospective randomized study of routine intraoperative cholangiography during open cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of predictors of choledocholithiasis. Surgery. 1993 Mar;113(3):318–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hauer-Jensen M., Kåresen R., Nygaard K., Solheim K., Amlie E., Havig O., Viddal K. O. Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation. Ann Surg. 1985 Jul;202(1):64–68. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huguier M., Bornet P., Charpak Y., Houry S., Chastang C. Selective contraindications based on multivariate analysis for operative cholangiography in biliary lithiasis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Jun;172(6):470–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lai E. C., Mok F. P., Tan E. S., Lo C. M., Fan S. T., You K. T., Wong J. Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 11;326(24):1582–1586. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206113262401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Neoptolemos J. P., Carr-Locke D. L., London N. J., Bailey I. A., James D., Fossard D. P. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet. 1988 Oct 29;2(8618):979–983. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90740-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Palazzo L., Girollet P. P., Salmeron M., Silvain C., Roseau G., Canard J. M., Chaussade S., Couturier D., Paolaggi J. A. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Sep;42(3):225–231. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70096-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Prat F., Amouyal G., Amouyal P., Pelletier G., Fritsch J., Choury A. D., Buffet C., Etienne J. P. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis. Lancet. 1996 Jan 13;347(8994):75–79. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90208-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Robertson G. S., Jagger C., Johnson P. R., Rathbone B. J., Wicks A. C., Lloyd D. M., Veitch P. S. Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the laparoscopic era. Arch Surg. 1996 Jan;131(1):89–94. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430130091019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saltzstein E. C., Peacock J. B., Thomas M. D. Preoperative bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and amylase levels as predictors of common duct stones. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Mar;154(3):381–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Strasberg S. M., Soper N. J. Management of choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Gastroenterology. 1995 Jul;109(1):320–322. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90302-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taylor T. V., Armstrong C. P., Rimmer S., Lucas S. B., Jeacock J., Gunn A. A. Prediction of choledocholithiasis using a pocket microcomputer. Br J Surg. 1988 Feb;75(2):138–140. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES