Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1995 Sep;141(1):333–346. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.333

Teosinte Branched1 and the Origin of Maize: Evidence for Epistasis and the Evolution of Dominance

J Doebley 1, A Stec 1, C Gustus 1
PMCID: PMC1206731  PMID: 8536981

Abstract

Two quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling differences in plant and inflorescence architecture between maize and its progenitor (teosinte) were analyzed. Complementation tests indicate that one of these, which is on chromosome arm 1L, is the locus for the maize mutant teosinte branched1 (tb1). This QTL has effects on inflorescence sex and the number and length of internodes in the lateral branches and inflorescences. This QTL has strong phenotypic effects in teosinte background but reduced effects in maize background. The second QTL, which is on chromosome arm 3L, affects the same traits as the QTL on 1L. We identify two candidate loci for this QTL. The effects of this QTL on several traits are reduced in both maize and teosinte background as compared to a maize-teosinte F(2) population. Genetic background appears to affect gene action for both QTL. Analysis of a population in which both QTL were segregating revealed that they interact epistatically. Together, these two QTL substantially transform both plant and inflorescence architecture. We propose that tb1 is involved in the teosinte plant's response to local environment to produce either long or short branches and that maize evolution involved a change at this locus to produce short branches under all environments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (8.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burr B., Burr F. A., Thompson K. H., Albertson M. C., Stuber C. W. Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):519–526. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cockerham C C. An Extension of the Concept of Partitioning Hereditary Variance for Analysis of Covariances among Relatives When Epistasis Is Present. Genetics. 1954 Nov;39(6):859–882. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.6.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coyne J. A., Crittenden A. P., Mah K. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science. 1994 Sep 2;265(5177):1461–1464. doi: 10.1126/science.8073292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doebley J., Stec A. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):285–295. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doebley J., Stec A. Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):559–570. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dorweiler J., Stec A., Kermicle J., Doebley J. Teosinte glume architecture 1: A Genetic Locus Controlling a Key Step in Maize Evolution. Science. 1993 Oct 8;262(5131):233–235. doi: 10.1126/science.262.5131.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards M. D., Stuber C. W., Wendel J. F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113–125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Galinat W. C. The origin of maize. Annu Rev Genet. 1971;5:447–478. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.05.120171.002311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gardiner J. M., Coe E. H., Melia-Hancock S., Hoisington D. A., Chao S. Development of a core RFLP map in maize using an immortalized F2 population. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):917–930. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Helentjaris T., Weber D., Wright S. Identification of the genomic locations of duplicate nucleotide sequences in maize by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Genetics. 1988 Feb;118(2):353–363. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kieber J. J., Ecker J. R. Ethylene gas: it's not just for ripening any more! Trends Genet. 1993 Oct;9(10):356–362. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90041-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lander E. S., Green P., Abrahamson J., Barlow A., Daly M. J., Lincoln S. E., Newberg L. A., Newburg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987 Oct;1(2):174–181. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Langham D G. The Inheritance of Intergeneric Differences in Zea-Euchlaena Hybrids. Genetics. 1940 Jan;25(1):88–107. doi: 10.1093/genetics/25.1.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sheridan W. F. Maize developmental genetics: genes of morphogenesis. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:353–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.002033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tanksley S. D. Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:205–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.001225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson J. N., Jr, Thoday J. M. Modification of dominance by selection in the homozygote. Heredity (Edinb) 1972 Dec;29(3):285–292. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1972.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES