Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Mar 25;29(6):711–719. doi: 10.1007/s10157-025-02653-4

Autophagic stagnation: a key mechanism in kidney disease progression linked to aging and obesity

Takeshi Yamamoto 1,
PMCID: PMC12125076  PMID: 40131605

Abstract

Autophagy, a critical intracellular degradation and recycling pathway mediated by lysosomes, is essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis through the quality control of proteins and organelles. Our research focused on the role of proximal tubular autophagy in the pathophysiology of aging, obesity, and diabetes. Using a novel method to monitor autophagic flux in kidney tissue, we revealed that age-associated high basal autophagy supports mitochondrial quality control and delays kidney aging. However, an impaired ability to upregulate autophagy under additional stress accelerates kidney aging. In obesity induced by a high-fat diet, lysosomal dysfunction disrupts autophagy, leading to renal lipotoxicity. Although autophagy is initially activated to repair organelle membranes and maintain proximal tubular cell integrity, this demand overwhelms lysosomes, resulting in “autophagic stagnation” characterized by phospholipid accumulation. Similar lysosomal phospholipid accumulation was observed in renal biopsies from elderly and obese patients. We identified TFEB-mediated lysosomal exocytosis as a mechanism to alleviate lipotoxicity by expelling accumulated phospholipids. Therapeutically, interventions such as the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin and eicosapentaenoic acid restore lysosomal function and autophagic activity. Based on these findings, we propose a novel disease concept, “Obesity-Related Proximal Tubulopathy.” This study underscores autophagic stagnation as a key driver of kidney disease progression in aging and obesity, offering insights into the pathophysiology of kidney diseases and providing a foundation for targeted therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: Kidney aging, Lysosomal dysfunction, Obesity-related proximal tubulopathy, Lipid overload, TFEB

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has reached epidemic proportions globally, affecting nearly one in five individuals in Japan and posing a significant public health challenge. The rising prevalence of CKD is closely linked to the aging population and increasing rates of obesity, both of which are major contributors to CKD development and progression.

Macroautophagy/autophagy, first observed by pathologists approximately 70 years ago, remained poorly understood for decades regarding its physiological relevance and molecular mechanisms. A breakthrough came in the 1990s with the discovery of autophagy-deficient yeast mutants, which spurred rapid advancements in elucidating its molecular basis. Autophagy is a highly conserved catabolic pathway in eukaryotic cells that facilitates the degradation and recycling of damaged or aged cellular components, thereby maintaining intracellular quality control and homeostasis.

Studies using autophagy-deficient mice have highlighted the crucial role of autophagy in maintaining proximal tubular homeostasis, particularly in protecting against various cellular and systemic stressors. More recently, evidence has emerged that dysregulated tubular autophagy under clinically relevant conditions—such as kidney aging and obesity—contributes significantly to disease pathophysiology.

In this review, we present our findings and perspectives on the role of autophagy in proximal tubule epithelial cells (PTECs), with a focus on its implications for the pathophysiology of kidney diseases.

What is autophagy?

The term “autophagy” is derived from the Greek words auto (self) and phagos (to eat) and refers to a cellular system for degrading cytoplasmic components within the acidic environment of lysosomes [1, 2]. The autophagy process unfolds as follows (Fig. 1a): upon starvation or organelle damage, a flat membrane structure known as the isolation membrane forms in the cytoplasm. This membrane elongates and engulfs damaged organelles and proteins targeted for degradation, creating a double-membrane vesicle called an autophagosome. The autophagosome then fuses with lysosomes to form an autolysosome, where the enclosed contents are degraded by lysosomal hydrolases. The resulting degradation products are recycled for protein synthesis and energy production, while the lysosome is regenerated from the autolysosome.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The core machinery of autophagy, regulation, and autophagic stagnation. A Upon induction of autophagy, cytoplasmic components are engulfed by a double-membrane organelle called the autophagosome, which subsequently fuses with a lysosome to degrade its contents into recyclable materials. B The roles of basal and inducible autophagy under various physiological and pathological conditions (including proposed mechanisms). Basal autophagy serves a clearance function, maintaining cellular homeostasis and exerting anti-aging effects. Inducible autophagy, triggered by short-term starvation stress, facilitates the degradation of organelles and proteins, while long-term starvation activates lipophagy to ensure energy supply through lipid metabolism. During renal injury stress, such as in AKI, autophagy supports recycling, clearance, and mitophagy to mitigate damage. C In contrast, during CKD, a significant increase in autophagy demand leads to lysosomal stress and dysfunction, resulting in impaired autophagic flux. These figures were created by the authors, Takeshi Yamamoto, Dr. Yoshitsugu Takabatake, and Prof. Yoshitaka Isaka

Structures resembling what we now recognize as autophagosomes and autolysosomes were first observed in 1957 [3]. However, autophagy research remained primarily descriptive and morphological until 1993, when Prof. Yoshinori Ohsumi and colleagues identified autophagy in yeast and generated autophagy-deficient mutants [4]. This breakthrough enabled the discovery of essential autophagy-related (Atg) proteins, many of which are involved in ubiquitin-like conjugation systems essential for autophagy progression. Among these, Atg5 and Atg7 knockout or knockdown models are commonly used to study autophagy deficiency (Fig. 1a).

Methods for observing and evaluating autophagic activity

The fundamental method for detecting autophagosomes morphologically is electron microscopy, which identifies double-membrane structures. The lipidation of LC3 (a homolog of Atg8) to form LC3-II, which localizes to autophagosome membranes, is widely used to visualize autophagosomes with fluorescently tagged LC3 or to assess LC3-II levels via SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1). In addition, GFP-LC3 transgenic mice have been developed to allow in vivo visualization of autophagosomes and are extensively utilized worldwide [5].

Since autophagy is a dynamic process in which autophagosomes are continually formed and degraded, measuring autophagic flux—the rate of this cycle—is crucial. For in vitro experiments, autophagic flux is often estimated by treating cells with autophagy/lysosome inhibitors and evaluating LC3-II accumulation. In 2016, we described a method to estimate autophagic flux in vivo by comparing the number of GFP-positive puncta in GFP-LC3 transgenic mice treated with chloroquine 6 h before euthanasia to untreated controls [6]. The accumulation of SQSTM1/p62, a substrate that interacts with LC3 and is efficiently incorporated into autophagosomes, is another established method for assessing autophagic activity. In autophagy-deficient cells, SQSTM1/p62 accumulates due to impaired degradation, forming aggregates that reflect defective autophagy. Comprehensive guidelines for autophagy assays have been periodically updated under the leadership of Prof. Daniel Klionsky and provide valuable resources for researchers in the field [7].

Autophagy in the kidney

Baseline autophagic activity varies across organs, with the liver demonstrating high activity, degrading approximately 2% of total protein per hour under starvation conditions [8]. The kidney, particularly the proximal tubule, also exhibits significant autophagosome formation under both basal and stress conditions [913]. As early as 1957, inclusion bodies containing small amounts of mitochondria were observed within lysosomes during the differentiation of renal tubular cells in neonatal mice [3]. However, since autophagy regained prominence in the 2000s, numerous studies have reported “increased” autophagy in various tubular injury models. Unfortunately, the physiological significance of these observations remained unclear due to the reliance on nonspecific autophagy inhibitors.

In 2011, our research group generated mice with proximal tubule-specific autophagy deficiency by crossing KAP-Cre mice (expressing Cre recombinase mainly in the S2-3 segments of the proximal tubule) with Atg5 flox mice. These knockout (KO) mice developed ubiquitin-positive aggregates and abnormal mitochondria in proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs) by 9 months of age [14]. By 2 years, they displayed phenotypes indicative of accelerated kidney aging, including interstitial fibrosis, suggesting that basal autophagy is essential for maintaining proximal tubular homeostasis [6]. Furthermore, using the aforementioned method to monitor autophagy in GFP-LC3 transgenic mice, we demonstrated that age-dependent high basal autophagy mitigates kidney aging, while a diminished capacity to upregulate autophagy under additional stress accelerates the aging process [6].

Lipophagy: starvation response in proximal tubules

What happens to proximal tubules during starvation, the most fundamental autophagy inducer? In mammals, starvation triggers lipid mobilization in adipose tissue, leading to the release of free fatty acids, which are subsequently stored as lipid droplets (LDs) in peripheral tissues and metabolized via β-oxidation in mitochondria for energy production. Lipids are a critical energy source for PTECs, which have a high energy demand. To investigate the relationship between autophagy and lipid metabolism, we examined the roles of LDs and autophagy in starvation-induced energy metabolism in proximal tubules [15].

Starvation in wild-type mice for up to 48 h resulted in the accumulation of LDs on the basolateral side of PTECs. Some LDs co-localized with the autophagosome marker LC3, and LC3 was abundantly detected in LD fractions. Electron microscopy revealed LDs enclosed by autophagosomes. Pulse-chase assays using fluorescently labeled fatty acids in cultured PTECs confirmed that LDs are transported to lysosomes via autophagosomes for degradation—a process termed lipophagy [16]. Autophagy-deficient cells failed to degrade LDs properly, leading to lipid accumulation, ATP depletion, and increased vulnerability to starvation stress. Similarly, proximal tubule-specific autophagy-deficient mice subjected to 48 h of starvation exhibited significant LD accumulation and reduced β-oxidation compared to wild-type mice. These findings indicate that lipophagy plays a crucial role in maintaining energy homeostasis in PTECs during starvation [15] (Fig. 1b).

Stagnation of autophagy in proximal tubules during aging and obesity

We sought to investigate whether proximal tubular autophagy is disrupted under stress conditions relevant to clinical settings, rather than in genetically modified mice. Through extensive trial and error, we identified lipid overload as a pertinent stressor [17]. When PTECs were exposed to palmitic acid (PAL), autophagosome formation was initially enhanced. However, over time, the accumulation of SQSTM1/p62-positive protein aggregates was observed, indicating a blockade in the late stages of the autophagic pathway. Electron microscopy revealed abnormal mitochondrial morphology and the accumulation of undigested organelles within lysosomes. Observations using LysoSensor demonstrated impaired lysosomal acidification due to PAL exposure.

In 2016, we generated mice with tamoxifen-inducible, proximal tubule-specific autophagy deficiency by crossing Ndrg1–CreERT2 mice with Atg5 flox mice [6]. Two months of high-fat diet (HFD) loading followed by 3 weeks of tamoxifen-induced autophagy deficiency revealed increased SQSTM1/p62-positive aggregate accumulation in the proximal tubules of the HFD group compared to the normal diet (ND) group. This finding suggests that HFD increases the autophagic workload in proximal tubules. Large vacuoles were observed in the proximal tubules of HFD-fed wild-type mice, identified as lysosomes with LAMP1-positive membranes and intraluminal phospholipid accumulation, which appeared as multilamellar bodies (MLBs) under electron microscopy, rather than LDs.

Pulse-chase assays using cultured cells demonstrated that phospholipids, particularly those from mitochondrial and other organelle membranes, redistributed via autophagic clearance of damaged mitochondria—a process termed mitophagy[18]—accumulating in lysosomes under lipid overload conditions. This indicates that lysosomal dysfunction, accompanied by excessive phospholipid accumulation, leads to impaired autophagic flux. Autophagy is involved in the formation of MLBs, as deletion of Atg5 prevents tubular vacuolation (phospholipid accumulation in enlarged lysosomes) in HFD-induced obese mice. However, autophagy deficiency severely exacerbates HFD-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis. Furthermore, we discovered that the kidneys of the obese mice are unable to activate autophagy to counteract further stress, thereby showing increased vulnerability to acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury. These findings suggest that while dependence on autophagy increases under HFD conditions, lysosomal dysfunction hampers smooth autophagic progression, resulting in kidney injury (Fig. 1c).

The phenomenon of “a significant increase in autophagic demand, lysosomal stress and dysfunction, and consequent impaired autophagic flux” is a shared characteristic, albeit with differences, observed in conditions such as kidney aging [6, 19], diabetic kidney disease (DKD) [20, 21], and high phosphate diet mediated-CKD progression [22]. We proposed this common mechanistic phenomenon as “stagnation of autophagy” [23] (Fig. 1c).

We further explored compensatory mechanisms that act against autophagic stagnation [19]. This study demonstrated that impaired autophagy in PTECs during aging or obesity induces fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) production, known for its anti-aging and anti-obesity properties [24]. FGF21 alleviates autophagic stagnation and maintains mitochondrial homeostasis, thereby reducing CKD progression [19].

Obesity-related proximal tubulopathy (ORT)

Obesity-related kidney disease is typically characterized by glomerular hypertrophy and segmental sclerosis, commonly referred to as “obesity-related glomerulopathy (ORG)” [25]. While much attention has been focused on glomerular lesions, recent evidence indicates that lipid overload-induced tubular lesions, such as MLB accumulation, contribute to kidney dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis [17, 2630].

Obesity is associated with adipocyte hypertrophy, leading to the secretion of pro-inflammatory saturated fatty acids [31]. PTECs are particularly vulnerable to lipid overload, as they actively uptake fatty acids from both circulation and glomerular filtrate via receptors such as LRP2 (low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/MEGALIN). LRP2-mediated endocytosis of glomerular-filtered albumin-bound fatty acids is involved in MLB formation, as this process is blocked by lrp2-/-deletion in HFD-fed obese mice [28, 32].

In exploring regulatory factors that protect against lipotoxicity, we identified transcription factor EB (TFEB) as a modulator of PTEC lipotoxicity [33]. TFEB regulates the expression of target genes bearing the coordinated lysosomal expression and regulation (CLEAR) motif, thereby regulating lysosomal biogenesis and function [34, 35]. First, lipid overload induces TFEB nuclear translocation via RAG C/D-dependent inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway in PTECs, which prevents phospholipid accumulation in lysosomes by promoting lysosomal exocytosis. Second, in HFD-fed mice, activated TFEB in PTECs counteracted phospholipid accumulation in lysosomes by promoting lysosomal exocytosis of MLB into urine. Conversely, TFEB deficiency resulted in autophagic stagnation and increased vulnerability to I/R injury in obese mice. Third, in CKD patients, higher body mass index correlated with increased tubular vacuolation (phospholipid accumulation in enlarged lysosomes) and reduced TFEB nuclear localization in PTECs. These findings suggest that insufficient TFEB activity, increased tubular vacuolar lesions, and autophagic stagnation are principal determinants of kidney function decline in obese patients (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Lysosomal dysfunction and TFEB-mediated counteraction in ORT. A Representative images of kidney specimens obtained from obese patients (PAS staining, LAMP1 staining, and electron micrograph). B Lysosomal dysfunction leads to autophagic stagnation in obesity-related proximal tubulopathy (ORT), while TFEB-mediated lysosomal exocytosis of phospholipids counteracts ORT. Proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs) retrieve albumin-bound palmitic acid (PA) from the glomerular filtrate via LRP2-mediated albumin (Alb) endocytosis. PA induces autophagy, mobilizing phospholipids from cellular membranes into lysosomes, which results in MLBs accumulation. In parallel, PA promotes TFEB nuclear translocation by inactivating RRAG GTPase through the sequestration of folliculin (FLCN) onto the lysosomal membrane. This process mediates lysosomal exocytosis, preventing MLBs accumulation and counteracting lipotoxicity. Reprinted from Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN)[17] and JCI Insight [33]

Notably, tubular vacuolar lesions in obesity-related kidney disease, characterized by lysosomal phospholipid/MLB accumulation, can be distinguished from those resulting from LD accumulation [15, 17]. Our observations in mouse kidneys revealed that lysosomal phospholipid accumulation is localized to the apical side of proximal tubules, whereas LD accumulation is found on the basolateral side, adjacent to the mitochondria. Moreover, lysosomal phospholipid accumulation does not stain with Oil-Red O, whereas LDs are readily stained by Oil-Red O. Electron microscopy demonstrates that phospholipid accumulation forms a multilamellar structure, while LDs exhibit a homogeneous structure. Immunohistochemical analysis further differentiates the two: lysosomal phospholipid accumulation is LAMP1-positive, while LDs are positive for adipose differentiation-related protein (ADRP), enabling clear distinction between the two [15, 17]. Collectively, we have proposed a novel disease concept, “Obesity-Related Proximal Tubulopathy (ORT),” as an emerging threat to kidney health (Fig. 2b) [36].

Therapeutic applications of autophagy

As described above, therapeutic strategies are needed for conditions where autophagic demand increases but the process is impaired. Current efforts aim to harness autophagy for therapeutic purposes, with most approaches focusing on either inhibiting autophagy (e.g., in cancer) or inducing it (e.g., in diseases where autophagy has organ-protective effects). However, in cases of lipid overload, further induction of autophagy may exacerbate the burden on the pathway and worsen the condition [17]. Indeed, pharmacological inducers of autophagy, such as mTOR inhibitors (e.g., rapamycin), have been shown to exacerbate I/R injury in streptozotocin (STZ)-treated type 1 DKD, where autophagy is stagnated due to lysosomal stress [21]. Thus, strategies should focus on preventing autophagic stagnation to address these pathologies.

Our recent findings indicate that eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), a widely used clinical agent, mitigates lysosomal dysfunction and restores autophagic flux and cellular function during lipid overload by encapsulating saturated fatty acids within protective LDs [37]. More recently, we investigated the renoprotective mechanisms of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin with a focus on albumin reabsorption and autophagy in proximal tubules. Empagliflozin, which decreases intraglomerular pressure, not only reduced the HFD-induced increase in albumin reabsorption via LRP2 in the proximal tubules but also ameliorated the HFD-induced imbalance in circulating albumin-bound fatty acids. Consequently, empagliflozin alleviated the HFD-induced increase in autophagic demand and successfully prevented autophagic stagnation in the proximal tubules (Fig. 3) [32].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin protects the kidney by preventing autophagic stagnation in proximal tubules. Increased glomerular pressure caused by a high-fat diet (HFD) or 5/6 nephrectomy induces tubular reabsorption of toxic albumin via LRP2, leading to increased autophagic demand and stagnation of autophagic flux, which heightens vulnerability to AKI. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduces intraglomerular pressure and ameliorates metabolic dysfunction, thereby improving the quantity and quality of filtered albumin and alleviating autophagic stagnation in PTECs. This prevention of autophagic stagnation ultimately enhances PTEC integrity, resulting in renoprotection. Reprinted from Autophagy [32]

Furthermore, we discovered that trehalose, which enhances TFEB nuclear translocation, reduces HFD-induced formation of cytosolic vacuoles in PTECs [33]. Thus, activating TFEB to promote lysosomal exocytosis and alleviate autophagic stagnation may represent an attractive treatment strategy for ORT. Given that nuclear TFEB localization in PTECs declines with age in both mice and humans [38, 39], understanding the mechanisms underlying autophagic stagnation and regulating lysosomal biogenesis and function appears to be key for therapeutic approaches for CKD patients [40].

Perspective and conclusion

The kidney was one of the first organs where autophagy-like structures were identified. Seventy years later, we are finally beginning to understand the pathophysiological significance of autophagy. Although this review did not cover the roles of chaperone-mediated autophagy and microautophagy in the kidney, the regulation of lysosomal quantity and quality at the organismal level, the implications of autophagic stagnation in ferroptosis, cellular senescence, or inflammation in the kidney, or the molecular mechanisms of selective autophagy—particularly mitophagy and lipophagy—these remain challenging questions [41].

To further understand changes in autophagy and leverage this knowledge to treat human diseases, it will be necessary to develop non-invasive methods for monitoring autophagic activity. Urine samples could hold promise for detecting autophagic stagnation in the kidney [12]. For instance, urinary levels of various phospholipids, such as bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate (BMP)—a lysosomal phospholipid increased in patients with phospholipidosis—are elevated in obese mice (Fig. 2b) [33].

In conclusion, autophagic stagnation constitutes a pivotal driver of kidney disease progression in aging and obesity. Our studies open new avenues for CKD treatment strategies targeting autophagic stagnation. Eight years have passed since Prof. Yoshinori Ohsumi was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his pioneering work on autophagy in 2016. We are hopeful that continued advancements in autophagy research will soon lead to therapeutic applications for kidney diseases, ultimately preventing kidney failure and the need for renal replacement therapy.

Acknowledgements

The author expresses gratitude to the Japanese Society of Nephrology for the 2024 Oshima Award. This research was also awarded the Japanese Society of Anti-Aging Medicine's 2023 Award. The autophagy research group was led by Dr. Yoshitsugu Takabatake. The author is deeply grateful to Drs. Atsushi Yamauchi (Osaka Rosai Hospital), Megumu Fukunaga (Fukunaga Clinic), and Tomonori Kimura (Kansai Medical Hospital); Professors Yoshitaka Isaka, Tamotsu Yoshimori, and Hiromi Rakugi (Osaka University); as well as Professors Masako Suzuki and Ana Maria Cuervo (Albert Einstein College of Medicine) for their invaluable mentorship. Special thanks are extended to colleagues and collaborators, particularly the autophagy group members: Drs. Atsushi Takahashi, Tomoko Namba-Hamano, Jun Matsuda, Satoshi Minami, Shinsuke Sakai, Ryuta Fujimura, Atsushi Hesaka, Hiroaki Yonishi, Jun Nakamura, Shihomi Maeda, Sho Matsui, Hideaki Kawai, and Takuya Kubota. The author also acknowledges Prof. Motoko Yanagita (Kyoto University) for providing Ndrg1–CreERT2 mice; Profs. Taiji Matsusaka and Fumio Niimura (Tokai University) for KAP–Cre mice; Prof. Noboru Mizushima (The University of Tokyo) for GFP-LC3 and Atg5fl/fl mice; and Prof. Andrea Ballabio (Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine) for Tfebfl/fl mice.

Funding

The author’s work and career development were supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology in Japan (15H06371, 17K16083, 21K16163, 23K07671); the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (JP23ek0310022/24ek0310022); and grants from the Naito Foundation, the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders, the Ichiro Kanehara Foundation, Kurata Grants (Hitachi Global Foundation), the Japan Health Foundation, the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, the Ono Medical Research Foundation, the Takeda Science Foundation, the Takeda Medical Research Foundation, the Terumo Life Science Foundation, the Kato Memorial Bioscience Foundation, the Novartis Foundation, the Nakatomi Foundation, the G-7 Scholarship Foundation, the Kanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science, the Tokyo Biochemical Research Foundation, the MSD Life Science Foundation, the Salt Science Research Foundation (2142, 2236, 2332), the Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation, the Daiwa Securities Foundation, the Suzuken Memorial Foundation, the Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation, the Yukiko Ishibashi Foundation, the Japan Diabetes Foundation/Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. & Eli Lilly Japan K.K., the Japan Diabetes Foundation/Costco Wholesale Japan Ltd., the Japan Diabetes Foundation/Novo Nordisk Pharma, the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity/Novo Nordisk Pharma, the Japan Kidney Association/Novo Nordisk Pharma, Bayer Academic Support, and the TANITA Healthy Weight Community Trust. This work was partially conducted within the Cooperative Research Project Program of the Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, and was supported by the Cooperative Study Program (22NIPS118) of the National Institute for Physiological Sciences. Part of the study was financially supported by Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. as a collaborative effort [32].

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This review article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Footnotes

This article was presented as the Oshima Award memorial lecture at the 67th annual meeting of the Japanese Society of Nephrology, held in Yokohama, Japan, in 2024.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Mizushima N, Levine B. Autophagy in human diseases. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(16):1564–76. 10.1056/NEJMra2022774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451(7182):1069–75. 10.1038/nature06639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clark SL Jr. Cellular differentiation in the kidneys of newborn mice studies with the electron microscope. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957;3(3):349–62. 10.1083/jcb.3.3.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tsukada M, Ohsumi Y. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1993;333(1–2):169–74. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80398-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mizushima N, Yamamoto A, Matsui M, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y. In vivo analysis of autophagy in response to nutrient starvation using transgenic mice expressing a fluorescent autophagosome marker. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(3):1101–11. 10.1091/mbc.e03-09-0704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Kimura T, Takahashi A, Namba T, Matsuda J, et al. Time-dependent dysregulation of autophagy: implications in aging and mitochondrial homeostasis in the kidney proximal tubule. Autophagy. 2016;12(5):801–13. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1159376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Klionsky DJ, Abdel-Aziz AK, Abdelfatah S, Abdellatif M, Abdoli A, Abel S, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)(1). Autophagy. 2021;17(1):1–382. 10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Komatsu M, Waguri S, Ueno T, Iwata J, Murata S, Tanida I, et al. Impairment of starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in Atg7-deficient mice. J Cell Biol. 2005;169(3):425–34. 10.1083/jcb.200412022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Isaka Y, Kimura T, Takabatake Y. The protective role of autophagy against aging and acute ischemic injury in kidney proximal tubular cells. Autophagy. 2011;7(9):1085–7. 10.4161/auto.7.9.16465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Takabatake Y, Kimura T, Takahashi A, Isaka Y. Autophagy and the kidney: health and disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(9):1639–47. 10.1093/ndt/gft535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Minami S, Yamamoto T, Yamamoto-Imoto H, Isaka Y, Hamasaki M. Autophagy and kidney aging. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2023;179:10–5. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yamamoto T, Isaka Y. Pathological mechanisms of kidney disease in ageing. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024;20(9):603–15. 10.1038/s41581-024-00868-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tang C, Livingston MJ, Liu Z, Dong Z. Autophagy in kidney homeostasis and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(9):489–508. 10.1038/s41581-020-0309-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kimura T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Kaimori JY, Matsui I, Namba T, et al. Autophagy protects the proximal tubule from degeneration and acute ischemic injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(5):902–13. 10.1681/ASN.2010070705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Minami S, Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Namba T, Matsuda J, et al. Lipophagy maintains energy homeostasis in the kidney proximal tubule during prolonged starvation. Autophagy. 2017;13(10):1629–47. 10.1080/15548627.2017.1341464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singh R, Kaushik S, Wang Y, Xiang Y, Novak I, Komatsu M, et al. Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Nature. 2009;458(7242):1131–5. 10.1038/nature07976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Kimura T, Namba T, Matsuda J, et al. High-fat diet-induced lysosomal dysfunction and impaired autophagic flux contribute to lipotoxicity in the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(5):1534–51. 10.1681/ASN.2016070731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Namba T, Takabatake Y, Kimura T, Takahashi A, Yamamoto T, Matsuda J, et al. Autophagic clearance of mitochondria in the kidney copes with metabolic acidosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(10):2254–66. 10.1681/ASN.2013090986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Minami S, Sakai S, Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Namba-Hamano T, Takahashi A, et al. FGF21 and autophagy coordinately counteract kidney disease progression during aging and obesity. Autophagy. 2024;20(3):489–504. 10.1080/15548627.2023.2259282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takahashi A, Takabatake Y, Kimura T, Maejima I, Namba T, Yamamoto T, et al. Autophagy inhibits the accumulation of advanced glycation end products by promoting lysosomal biogenesis and function in the kidney proximal tubules. Diabetes. 2017;66(5):1359–72. 10.2337/db16-0397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sakai S, Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Namba-Hamano T, Minami S, et al. Proximal tubule autophagy differs in type 1 and 2 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(6):929–45. 10.1681/ASN.2018100983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fujimura R, Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Namba-Hamano T, Minami S, et al. Autophagy protects kidney from phosphate-induced mitochondrial injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;524(3):636–42. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.01.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takabatake Y, Yamamoto T, Isaka Y. Stagnation of autophagy: a novel mechanism of renal lipotoxicity. Autophagy. 2017;13(4):775–6. 10.1080/15548627.2017.1283084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kharitonenkov A, DiMarchi R. Fibroblast growth factor 21 night watch: advances and uncertainties in the field. J Intern Med. 2017;281(3):233–46. 10.1111/joim.12580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.D’Agati VD, Chagnac A, de Vries AP, Levi M, Porrini E, Herman-Edelstein M, et al. Obesity-related glomerulopathy: clinical and pathologic characteristics and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12(8):453–71. 10.1038/nrneph.2016.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bakker PJ, Butter LM, Kors L, Teske GJ, Aten J, Sutterwala FS, et al. Nlrp3 is a key modulator of diet-induced nephropathy and renal cholesterol accumulation. Kidney Int. 2014;85(5):1112–22. 10.1038/ki.2013.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Decleves AE, Zolkipli Z, Satriano J, Wang L, Nakayama T, Rogac M, et al. Regulation of lipid accumulation by AMP-activated kinase [corrected] in high fat diet-induced kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2014;85(3):611–23. 10.1038/ki.2013.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kuwahara S, Hosojima M, Kaneko R, Aoki H, Nakano D, Sasagawa T, et al. Megalin-mediated tubuloglomerular alterations in high-fat diet-induced kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(7):1996–2008. 10.1681/ASN.2015020190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rampanelli E, Ochodnicky P, Vissers JP, Butter LM, Claessen N, Calcagni A, et al. Excessive dietary lipid intake provokes an acquired form of lysosomal lipid storage disease in the kidney. J Pathol. 2018;246(4):470–84. 10.1002/path.5150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nakatsuka A, Yamaguchi S, Eguchi J, Kakuta S, Iwakura Y, Sugiyama H, et al. A Vaspin-HSPA1L complex protects proximal tubular cells from organelle stress in diabetic kidney disease. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):373. 10.1038/s42003-021-01902-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yau K, Kuah R, Cherney DZI, Lam TKT. Obesity and the kidney: mechanistic links and therapeutic advances. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024;20(6):321–35. 10.1038/s41574-024-00951-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Matsui S, Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Namba-Hamano T, Matsuda J, et al. Empagliflozin protects the kidney by reducing toxic ALB (albumin) exposure and preventing autophagic stagnation in proximal tubules. Autophagy. 2024. 10.1080/15548627.2024.2410621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nakamura J, Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Namba-Hamano T, Minami S, Takahashi A, et al. TFEB-mediated lysosomal exocytosis alleviates high-fat diet-induced lipotoxicity in the kidney. JCI Insight. 2023. 10.1172/jci.insight.162498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sardiello M, Palmieri M, di Ronza A, Medina DL, Valenza M, Gennarino VA, et al. A gene network regulating lysosomal biogenesis and function. Science. 2009;325(5939):473–7. 10.1126/science.1174447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Palmieri M, Impey S, Kang H, di Ronza A, Pelz C, Sardiello M, et al. Characterization of the CLEAR network reveals an integrated control of cellular clearance pathways. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(19):3852–66. 10.1093/hmg/ddr306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yamamoto T, Nakamura J, Takabatake Y, Isaka Y. Obesity-related proximal tubulopathy: an emerging threat to kidney health. Autophagy Rep. 2023. 10.1080/27694127.2023.2200341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Minami S, Sakai S, Fujimura R, Takahashi A, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid attenuates renal lipotoxicity by restoring autophagic flux. Autophagy. 2021;17(7):1700–13. 10.1080/15548627.2020.1782034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nakamura J, Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Namba-Hamano T, Takahashi A, Matsuda J, et al. Age-related TFEB downregulation in proximal tubules causes systemic metabolic disorders and occasional apolipoprotein A4-related amyloidosis. JCI Insight. 2024. 10.1172/jci.insight.184451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maeda S, Sakai S, Takabatake Y, Yamamoto T, Minami S, Nakamura J, et al. MondoA and AKI and AKI-to-CKD transition. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024;35(9):1164–82. 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ballabio A, Bonifacino JS. Lysosomes as dynamic regulators of cell and organismal homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(2):101–18. 10.1038/s41580-019-0185-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cuervo AM, Elazar Z, Evans C, Ge L, Hansen M, Jaattela M, et al. Next questions in autophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 2024;26(5):661–6. 10.1038/s41556-024-01404-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES