Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Apr 16;39(4):530–544. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03493-y

Prevalence of HIV-related pain in Japan: a clinical survey

Megumi Kanao-Kanda 1,2,#, Sarah Kyuragi Luthe 1,2,#, Yoshiko Onodera 2, Izumi Sato 2, Tomoyuki Endo 3, Tomoyuki Kawamata 1, Hirotsugu Kanda 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12301280  PMID: 40237886

Abstract

Background

Although human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related peripheral neuropathies are among the most common neurological complications in patients with HIV infection, the prevalence and patient characteristics of HIV-related pain and peripheral neuropathic pain in Japan remain unclear.

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the prevalence and patient characteristics of HIV-related pain with a focus on peripheral neuropathic pain among Japanese patients.

Methods

We conducted a survey among patients diagnosed with HIV infection and reviewed their medical records to collect the following information; age, sex, presence of pain or numbness, duration of pain or numbness, duration of HIV infection, clusters of differentiation 4 (CD4) T-cell count, ribonucleic acid (RNA) load, diagnosis and duration of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), treatment status and duration of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of HIV-related pain with a focus on peripheral neuropathic pain.

Results

A survey was distributed to 474 patients, of whom 270 chose not to participate. Consequently, data from 204 patients were included in the analysis. The prevalence of HIV-related pain was 16% and patients with possible HIV-related peripheral neuropathic pain was 9.3%. Among these patients, age, presence of numbness, duration of numbness, and duration of AIDS were significantly higher than in patients without HIV-related pain.

Conclusions

In this prospective multi-center cross-sectional study, the prevalence of HIV-related pain was 16% among 204 Japanese patients with HIV in which they tended to have advanced age and longer duration of AIDS compared to patients without HIV-related pain.

Keywords: HIV, Neuropathic pain, Clinical survey

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a well-documented condition in the United States, affecting over 1.2 million people nationwide [1]. Among the numerous complications associated with HIV, HIV-related pain is one of the most commonly reported symptoms in people living with HIV [2], although prevalence estimates vary widely. One systematic review reported a point prevalence of 54–83% using a three-month recall period [3]. In contrast, the cumulative total of people living with HIV in Japan was reported to be 23,863 in 2021 [4], yet HIV-related pain remains underrecognized among both Japanese patients and healthcare providers. Furthermore, chronic pain is prevalent among individuals with HIV [5], which can lead to significant disability and poor outcomes [6].

Common types of HIV-related pain include neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal pain, headaches and abdominal pain [7]. Among these, HIV-related peripheral neuropathy is the most common neurological complications in patients with HIV infection [810], with an estimated prevalence of 6.9–10% in a systematic review of epidemiological studies [11]. HIV-related peripheral neuropathy can affect both sensory and motor nerves in the distal limbs, leading to clinical manifestations such as pain, numbness, loss of sensation, paresthesia, burning sensation, and stabbing sensations. These symptoms typically present in a stocking-glove distribution primarily affecting the feet and hand, and can be profoundly debilitating for patients [10, 12]. In reference to the underlying neuropathological mechanisms of HIV-related peripheral neuropathy and its treatment, our team has utilized viral vectors in animal experiments to suggest that targeting mitochondrial dynamics may be beneficial [1315]. However, the exact mechanism remains unknown. In addition, although early initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can benefit in preventing neurological complications with HIV infection, distinguishing between HIV-related peripheral neuropathy caused by HIV itself, and the neurotoxic effects of HAART, known as antiretroviral toxic neuropathy (ATN) [16], remains challenging. Accordingly, reported risk factors for HIV-related peripheral neuropathy include treatment with HAART, low clusters of differentiation (CD) 4 count, elevated plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load, advanced age, and history of substance abuse [17]. A nationwide survey conducted in Japan before the introduction of HAART in 1996, showed that 2.6% of the 578 individuals with AIDS reported peripheral neuropathy [18]. However, the prevalence and characteristics of HIV-related pain and peripheral neuropathy in Japan remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics and prevalence of patients with HIV-related pain in Japan with a focus on peripheral neuropathic pain.

Patients and methods

Study design

We conducted a prospective multi-center cross-sectional study. This study was approved by the Asahikawa Medical University Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 16215) and Hokkaido University (Independent Clinical Research Number: 017-0061) and was registered as a clinical trial (UMIN 000036713). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Inclusion criteria

We included patients with HIV infection who visited the Department of Hematology at Hokkaido University Hospital and the HIV outpatient clinic at Asahikawa Medical University Hospital for treatment or follow-up between April 18, 2017 and May 11, 2021. We excluded patients with cognitive impairment due to mental disorders or central nervous abnormalities, those who demonstrated non-compliance with the survey, and those with incomplete medical records. Consequently, we distributed the survey to 474 patients, of whom 270 chose not to participate. Finally, data from 204 patients were included in the analysis.

Data collection

We conducted a survey among patients diagnosed with HIV infection in addition to reviewing medical records to collect the following information regarding each patient; age, sex, presence of pain or numbness, duration of pain or numbness, duration of HIV infection, CD4 T-cell count, ribonucleic acid (RNA) load, diagnosis and duration of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), treatment status and duration of HAART. The clinical survey was based on common symptoms associated with HIV-related pain and peripheral neuropathic pain and by evaluating questionnaires that were previously used to assess pain, including the Japanese version of the “painDETECT” questionnaire [19] referenced from the executive summary of clinical guidelines of pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain provided by the Japanese society of Pain Clinicians [20]. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence and characteristics of patients with HIV-related pain and peripheral neuropathic pain. Table 1 displays the Japanese survey translated into English.

Table 1.

Japanese survey translated to English

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1a_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1b_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1c_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1d_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1e_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1f_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1g_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1h_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1i_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 540_2025_3493_Tab1j_HTML.jpg

Statistical analysis

To compare the demographic and blood test results between those with and without HIV-related neuropathic pain, we used Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous data and χ2 test or Fisher exact test for discrete variables. All p-values were considered statistically significant with P < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables, and percentage for categorical and sequential variables. All statistical analyses were performed by JMP statistical software (version 14.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

A survey was distributed to 474 patients, of whom 270 chose not to participate. Consequently, data from 204 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 97% of the patients were male (198 of 204 patients) and 97% of patients received treatment with HAART (198 of 204 patients). Among the 204 patients included in this analysis, 72 patients responded “Yes” to Q1 (Table 1): “Do you currently have pain anywhere in your body?”. We excluded 40 patients who reported conditions with known causes of pain such as lumbar stenosis, disk herniation, trauma, hemophilic arthritis (hemarthrosis), and others in Q1-1 (Table 1): “What do you think is the cause of the pain?”. The remaining 32 patients (16%) who did not report conditions with known causes of pain were identified as possible HIV-related pain and included in the HIV-related pain group (Table 2). The characteristics of patients with and without HIV-related pain is summarized in Table 2. We found that 19 (59.4%) out of the 32 patients, identified their distal limbs (upper extremity or lower extremity or both) as the affected area, suggesting possible HIV-related peripheral neuropathy as a cause of their pain (19 out of 204, 9.3%). Additionally, nearly half of the patients who identified pain in distal limbs also experienced numbness (9 out of 19). The mean duration of pain in patients who reported HIV-related pain was approximately 4.5 years (54 months). Among these patients, several characteristics were significantly higher, including advanced age, presence and extended duration of numbness, and extended duration of AIDS, compared to patients without HIV-related pain. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in CD4 T-cell count, RNA load, treatment status, or duration of HAART between patients with and without HIV-related pain. Of note, all patients who reported pain were treated with HAART. Table 3 demonstrates the patient demographics of each of the 32 patients with HIV-related pain.

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients with and without HIV-related pain

HIV-related pain
(n = 32)
No HIV-related pain
(n = 172)
P value
Pain 32
Distal limbs as location of pain 19
Numbness in distal limbs 9
Duration of pain (months) 53.9 ± 5.27
Age (year) 52.2 ± 12.6 46.4 ± 11.5 0.0100
Sex(male/female) 31/1 167/5 1.0000
Numbness anywhere 16 16 < 0.001
Duration of numbness (months) 24.3 ± 53.1 3.81 ± 21.0 0.0003
Duration of HIV infection (months) 140 ± 105 122 ± 98.7 0.3450
CD4 T-cell count 554 ± 52.6 604 ± 308 0.3876
RNA load 3.44 ± 14.1 341 ± 3580 0.5942
Diagnosis of AIDS 16 56 0.0648
Duration of AIDS (months) 56.0 ± 78.8 27.5 ± 56.3 0.0161
Treatment with HAART 32 166 0.5927
Duration of HAART (months) 105 ± 79.8 90.2 ± 78.6 0.3371

HIV human immunodeficiency virus, CD cluster of differentiation, RNA ribonucleic acid, AIDS acquired immune deficiency syndrome, HAART highly active antiretroviral therapy

Table 3.

Patient demographics

Patient no Sex Age (year) Duration of pain (months) Location of pain Treatment Presence of numbness anywhere
1 Male 39 216 LB, Trunk None None
2 Male 54 81 Neck, UB None Yes
3 Male 40 156 UE, LE, Neck, Gluteal Medication, fomentation, local anesthetic injection Yes
4 Male 63 1 LB None None
5 Male 70 216 Knee, LB Fomentation None
6 Male 47 4 UE, Neck, Occipital, LB None Yes
7 Male 49 Blank Facial Medication None
8 Male 62 17 UE None None
9 Male 49 256 Knee, LB Fomentation, massage tools Yes
10 Male 44 5 UE, LB Massage Yes
11 Female 68 Blank Blank None None
12 Male 68 Blank Knee, LB Fomentation None
13 Male 49 96 LB Medication Yes
14 Male 39 36 UB None Yes
15 Male 68 36 LE None None
16 Male 59 4 UE, LE, LB Fomentation, massage Yes
17 Male 54 12 LE Fomentation, massage Yes
18 Male 58 108 UE, LE, LB Fomentation Yes
19 Male 33 12 LE Heat treatment Yes
20 Male 58 6 LE None None
21 Male 41 Blank LE Fomentation Yes
22 Male 52 Blank UE, LE Fomentation Yes
23 Male 85 2 LE Massage, massage tools None
24 Male 48 50 UE, LE Massage Yes
25 Male 31 2 UE None None
26 Male 32 26 Head Medication Yes
27 Male 52 12 LE None None
28 Male 55 2 UE None Yes
29 Male 37 0 LE, Trunk Medication None
30 Male 66 96 UB Exercise None
31 Male 53 1 UE None None
32 Male 48 4 LE None None
Duration of numbness (months) Duration of HIV infection (months) CD4 T-cell count RNA load Diagnosis of AIDS Duration of AIDS (months) Treatment with HAART Duration of HAART (months)
0 Blank 376 0 Blank 0 Yes 42
2 371 312 0 Yes 250 Yes 248
216 391 805 0 None 0 Yes 319
0 185 566 0 Yes 185 Yes 185
0 170 410 0 Yes 170 Yes 167
Blank 179 668 0 None 0 Yes 126
0 217 560 0 None 0 Yes 121
0 148 621 0 None 0 Yes 139
11 144 551 0 None 0 Yes 139
2 140 859 0 None 0 Yes 104
0 134 404 0 Yes 134 Yes 132
0 332 293 0 Yes 124 Yes 116
96 131 686 0 None 0 Yes 37
36 283 474 0 None 0 Yes 143
0 125 221 0 Yes 125 Yes 121
4 98 290 70 Yes 31 Yes 31
24 99 741 0 None 0 Yes 82
Blank 85 451 0 Yes 84 Yes 74
36 60 802 0 None 0 Yes 55
0 70 271 0 Yes 71 Yes 70
180 56 831 0 Yes 57 Yes 55
Blank 55 949 0 None 0 Yes 50
0 51 457 0 None 0 Yes 49
50 51 452 0 Yes 50 Yes 49
0 55 730 40 None 0 Yes 35
45 49 922 0 None 0 Yes 38
0 36 714 0 None 0 Yes 10
2 100 711 0 Yes Yes 97
0 22 314 0 Yes 22 Yes 21
0 356 872 0 Yes 260 Yes 332
0 27 149 0 Yes 28 Yes 27
0 145 277 0 Yes 145 Yes 142

HIV human immunodeficiency virus, CD cluster of differentiation, RNA ribonucleic acid, AIDS acquired immune deficiency syndrome, HAART highly active antiretroviral therapy, LB lower back, UB upper back, UE upper extremity, LE lower extremity

Discussion

By analyzing a clinical survey and medical records of 204 Japanese patients with HIV infection, we found that the prevalence of HIV-related pain was 16% and patients with possible HIV-related peripheral neuropathic pain was 9.3%. Among these patients, age, presence and duration of numbness, and duration of AIDS was significantly higher than in patients without HIV-related pain. Further, we found that approximately 60% of the patients who reported pain identified their distal limbs as the affected area, suggesting possible HIV-related peripheral neuropathy as a cause of their pain. Additionally, nearly half of the patients who identified pain in distal limbs also experienced numbness. However, we acknowledge that not all of these patients meet the diagnostic criteria for peripheral neuropathy, as a self-reported survey alone cannot establish this diagnosis.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of patients with HIV-related pain with a focus on peripheral neuropathic pain in Japanese patients since the widespread adoption of HAART in 1996. The prevalence of overall neuropathy among patients with HIV in the United States, derived from 25 studies, varied from 1.2% to 69.4% [21]. Further, the prevalence of HIV-related peripheral neuropathy has been indicated as 6.9–10% in a systematic review of epidemiological studies [11], while the reports vary between 30 and 50% of HIV-positive patients [17], and one study reported a high prevalence of distal sensory polyneuropathy at 57% in the HAART era [22]. Another study indicated that while the prevalence of HIV-related peripheral neuropathy in patients who have not received HAART was 29%, the number increased to 38% for patients at various stages of the disease [23]. Accordingly, HIV-related neuropathic pain is identified to be associated with the virus itself, opportunistic infections, and neurotoxic effects of HAART, known as ATN [13, 16, 24]. A nationwide survey conducted in Japan before the introduction of HAART in 1996 showed that 2.6% of the 578 individuals with AIDS reported peripheral neuropathy [18]. Conversely, our study showed the prevalence of HIV-related pain was 16% with approximately 60% of these patients identifying their distal limbs as the affected area and nearly half of the patients who identified pain in distal limbs also experienced numbness, suggesting possible HIV-related peripheral neuropathy. All patients with HIV-related pain were treated with HARRT.

There are several potential reasons that the prevalence rate of HIV-related pain and possible HIV-related peripheral neuropathic pain was lower in our study compared to studies in the US. First, the smaller sample size and self-reported nature of the clinical survey may have led to less representation and underreporting, as other studies typically include clinical diagnoses, different patient behavior and reporting standards. We believe that the limited awareness and recognition of HIV-related pain among both patients and healthcare providers in Japan may contribute to underdiagnosing, low treatment rate, and further limiting treatment options due to insufficient research. Furthermore, our study revealed that several patient characteristics were significantly higher in patients with HIV-related pain, such as advanced age, presence and extended duration of numbness, and extended duration of AIDS compared to patients without HIV-related peripheral neuropathic pain. This trend of advanced age and extended duration of chronic systemic disease is similar to that seen in diabetic neuropathy and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, which both have similar manifestations to HIV-related peripheral neuropathy. Moreover, advanced age noted in our results was consistent with one of the risk factors suggested as HIV-related peripheral neuropathy in a previous report, while others included were treatment with HAART, low CD count, elevated plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load, advanced age, and history of substance abuse [17]. In contrast, there were no significant differences seen in our study for CD4 T-cell count, RNA load, treatment status, or duration of HAART between patients with and without HIV-related pain, although this is likely due to the high rate of treatment of HAART (97% of all patients in our study).

Finally, this study has several potential limitations. Our study faces inherent challenges associated with survey-based research, including a high dropout rate, potential response bias, and reliance on self-reported data. Self-reported data can be subjective and prone to inaccuracies such as underreporting, recall bias, or misinterpretation of survey questions, and selection bias as only individuals who opted to participate were included. Furthermore, the self-reported nature of the questionnaire complicates the determination of whether the identified pain was truly HIV-related. Specifically, the 32 patients that we identified as HIV-related pain were those who did not report conditions with known causes of pain, while not all explicitly attributed their pain to HIV. Nonetheless, we considered it important to include all 32 patients in the analysis for possible HIV-related pain, regardless of whether they identified HIV as the cause because HIV-related pain is not well recognized among Japanese patients or healthcare providers, likely contributing to its underdiagnosis and undertreatment. Additionally, it is uncommon for HIV patients to attribute their pain to HIV, further supporting the inclusion of these cases in our analysis. Moreover, the generalizability of this study may be constrained by the small sample size and reliance on data from two institution, as regional variations in healthcare access, clinical practices, and patient demographics could impact the applicability of the findings to broader populations. However, it is important to highlight that our study analyzed a meaningful sample size of over 200 patients, providing valuable insights into the study population. Despite these limitations, our study provides meaningful context by aligning with national epidemiological data. Specifically, 97% of our participants were male, which corresponds closely to the gender distribution of patients with HIV infection and AIDS in Japan reported in the 2023 national epidemiological data from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. According to this report, the gender distribution was 649 males versus 20 females (97.0% male) for individuals with HIV and 282 males versus 9 females (96.9% male) for those with AIDS [25]. This consistency strengthens the robustness of our discussion by providing a contextual foundation for interpreting our study findings within the broader national landscape. Furthermore, this highlights the importance of tailoring interventions and healthcare services to address the predominantly male demographic affected by HIV in Japan.

Conclusion

In this prospective multi-center cross-sectional study, we found that the prevalence of HIV-related pain was 16% by analyzing a survey and medical records of 204 Japanese patients with HIV infection and patients with possible HIV-related peripheral neuropathic pain was 9.3%. Among these patients, age, presence and duration of numbness, duration of AIDS was significantly higher than in patients without HIV-related pain. To further enhance the understanding of HIV-related pain and peripheral neuropathic pain, multi-center and nationwide studies are warranted to validate and expand upon our findings, including the prevalence and risk factors of these conditions. Limited awareness and recognition of HIV-related pain among both patients and healthcare providers in Japan, such as pain clinicians, anesthesiologists, and infectious disease specialists, likely contributes to underdiagnosis and low treatment rates. Addressing these gaps through comprehensive studies is essential to improving diagnosis, treatment strategies, and overall patient care.

Author contributions

HK and MK contributed to the study conception and design. YO, IS and TE conducted the study, data collection, and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SL and revised by SL, TK, HK and MK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets for the current study are not publicly available due to institutional restrictions but may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to institutional and ethical approvals.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Megumi Kanao-Kanda and Sarah Kyuragi Luthe are equally contributing first authors of this article.

References

  • 1.Bosh KA, Hall HI, Eastham L, Daskalakis DC, Mermin JH. Estimated annual number of HIV infections—United States, 1981–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(22):801–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cox S, Rice A. HIV and AIDS. In: Wilson PR, Watson PJ, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen TS, editors. Clinical pain management: chronic pain. 2nd ed. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 2008. p. 35261. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parker R, Stein DJ, Jelsma J. Pain in people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(1):18719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.2022 Trends in HIV incidence in Japan [Japanese]. https://api-net.jfap.or.jp/status/japan/data/2022/nenpo/r04gaiyo.pdf
  • 5.Povshedna T, Swann SA, Levy SLA, Campbell AR, Choinière M, Durand M, Price C, Gill P, Murray MCM, Côté HCF. Global prevalence of chronic pain in women with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10(8):ofad350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Slawek DE. People living with HIV and the emerging field of chronic pain-what is known about epidemiology, etiology, and management. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2021;18(5):436–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Madden VJ, Parker R, Goodin BR. Chronic pain in people with HIV: a common comorbidity and threat to quality of life. Pain Manag. 2020;10(4):253–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gabbai AA, Castelo A, Oliveira AS. HIV peripheral neuropathy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;115:515–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keswani SC, Pardo CA, Cherry CL, Hoke A, McArthur JC. HIV-associated sensory neuropathies. AIDS. 2002;16(16):2105–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McArthur JC, Brew BJ, Nath A. Neurological complications of HIV infection. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:543–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van Hecke O, Austin SK, Khan RA, Smith BH, Torrance N. Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Pain. 2014;155(4):654–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Evans SR, Ellis RJ, Chen H, Yeh TM, Lee AJ, Schifitto G, Wu K, Bosch RJ, McArthur JC, Simpson DM, Clifford DB. Peripheral neuropathy in HIV: prevalence and risk factors. AIDS. 2011;25(7):919–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kanda H, Liu S, Iida T, Yi H, Huang W, Levitt RC, Lubarsky DA, Candiotti KA, Hao S. Inhibition of mitochondrial fission protein reduced mechanical allodynia and suppressed spinal mitochondrial superoxide induced by perineural human immunodeficiency virus gp120 in rats. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(1):264–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kanao M, Kanda H, Huang W, Liu S, Yi H, Candiotti KA, Lubarsky DA, Levitt RC, Hao S. gene transfer of glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 by herpes simplex virus vectors suppresses neuropathic pain induced by human immunodeficiency virus gp120 combined with ddC in rats. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(6):1394–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kanda H, Kanao M, Liu S, Yi H, Iida T, Levitt RC, Candiotti KA, Lubarsky DA, Hao S. HSV vector-mediated GAD67 suppresses neuropathic pain induced by perineural HIV gp120 in rats through inhibition of ROS and Wnt5a. Gene Ther. 2016;23(4):340–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang SX, Ho EL, Grill M, Lee E, Peterson J, Robertson K, Fuchs D, Sinclair E, Price RW, Spudich S. Peripheral neuropathy in primary HIV infection associates with systemic and central nervous system immune activation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(3):303–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stavros K, Simpson DM. Understanding the etiology and management of HIV-associated peripheral neuropathy. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2014;11(3):195–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nakagawa M, Maruyama Y, Sugita H, Osame M. Nationwide survey of neurologic manifestations of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in Japan. Intern Med. 1997;36(3):175–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Matsubayashi Y, Takeshita K, Sumitani M, Oshima Y, Tonosu J, Kato S, Ohya J, Oichi T, Okamoto N, Tanaka S. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9): e68013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sumitani M, Sakai T, Matsuda Y, Abe H, Yamaguchi S, Hosokawa T, Fukui S. Executive summary of the Clinical Guidelines of Pharmacotherapy for Neuropathic Pain: second edition by the Japanese Society of Pain Clinicians. J Anesth. 2018;32(3):463–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ghosh S, Chandran A, Jansen JP. Epidemiology of HIV-related neuropathy: a systematic literature review. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012;28(1):36–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ellis RJ, Rosario D, Clifford DB, McArthur JC, Simpson D, Alexander T, Gelman BB, Vaida F, Collier A, Marra CM, Ances B, Atkinson JH, Dworkin RH, Morgello S, Grant I, CHARTER Study Group. Continued high prevalence and adverse clinical impact of human immunodeficiency virus-associated sensory neuropathy in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy: the CHARTER Study. Arch Neurol. 2010;67(5):552–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Julian T, Rekatsina M, Shafique F, Zis P. Human immunodeficiency virus-related peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(4):1420–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Verma S, Estanislao L, Simpson D. HIV-associated neuropathic pain: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. CNS Drugs. 2005;19(4):325–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Breakdown of patients with HIV infection and AIDS reported in 2023 in Japan (Table 1) [Japanese]. https://api-net.jfap.or.jp/status/japan/data/2023/nenpo/hyo-01.pdf

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets for the current study are not publicly available due to institutional restrictions but may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to institutional and ethical approvals.


Articles from Journal of Anesthesia are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES