Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2021 Aug 31;6(4):10.1128/msystems.00381-21. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00381-21

Assessing the Impact of Flavophospholipol and Virginiamycin Supplementation on the Broiler Microbiota: a Prospective Controlled Intervention Study

Mohamed Mysara a,b, Matilda Berkell a,c,#, Basil Britto Xavier a,#, Sarah De Backer a, Christine Lammens a, Veerle Hautekiet d, Spas Petkov e, Herman Goossens a, Samir Kumar-Singh a,c, Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar a,
Editor: Jack A Gilbertf
PMCID: PMC12338151  PMID: 34463581

ABSTRACT

The antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) flavophospholipol and virginiamycin have been widely used for decades in food animal production. AGP activity is believed to be partly modulated by gut microbial composition although exact AGP-induced changes remain unclear. In a controlled intervention study, we studied the effect of flavophospholipol and virginiamycin on the broiler chicken ileal microbiota spanning from birth to 39 days. Using 16S rRNA gene profiling and prediction of metabolic activity, we show that both AGPs result in dynamic microbial shifts that potentially increase anti-inflammatory mechanisms and bioavailability of several essential nutrients by decreasing degradation (flavophospholipol) or increasing biosynthesis (virginiamycin). Further, virginiamycin-supplemented broilers showed increased colonization with potentially pathogenic bacteria, Clostridium perfringens, Campylobacter, and Escherichia/Shigella spp. Overall, we show that both AGPs induce microbial changes potentially beneficial for growth. However, the increase in (foodborne) pathogens shown here with virginiamycin use could impact not only broiler mortality but also human health.

IMPORTANCE Antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) are commonly used within poultry farming to increase muscle growth. Microbial composition in the gut is known to be influenced by AGP use although exact AGP-induced changes remain unclear. Utilizing 16S rRNA gene profiling, this study provides a first head-to-head comparison of the effect of the two most commonly used AGPs, flavophospholipol and virginiamycin, on the broiler chicken ileum microbiota over time. We found that supplementation with both AGPs altered ileal microbial composition, thereby increasing potential bioavailability of essential nutrients and weight gain. Flavophospholipol showed a slight benefit over virginiamycin as the latter resulted in more extensive microbial perturbations including increased colonization by enteropathogens, which could impact broiler mortality.

KEYWORDS: flavomycin, flavophospholipol, virginiamycin, broiler chicken, microbiota, 16S rRNA sequencing

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) have been widely used in broiler chickens to improve growth performance in the farming of food animals for over 60 years, including flavophospholipol and virginiamycin (1, 2). Flavophospholipol (synonyms: bambermycin, moenomycin) is a phosphoglycolipid antimicrobial produced by Streptomyces spp. that inhibits cell wall synthesis of primarily Gram-positive bacteria (3, 4). Virginiamycin belongs to the streptogramin class and consists of two active components that inhibit protein synthesis by binding to 23S rRNA of the 50S ribosomal subunit (5). Although a beneficial effect in promoting muscle growth has been reported for both, the underlying mechanisms by which APGs promote growth are not fully understood (6, 7). It is suggested that the promoting activity of AGPs is in part driven by a modulation of the microbial composition in the gut, including, but not limited to, suppression of pathogenic bacteria (8, 9). For instance, flavophospholipol is known to suppress certain microorganisms (e.g., Staphylococcus xylosus and Enterococcus faecalis) and contribute to an improved equilibrium of the gut microflora by providing a barrier that prevents colonization by pathogenic bacteria, which is associated with improved weight gain and feed conversion (10). Additionally, reduced shedding of pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella spp., has been reported for flavophospholipol in pigs, calves, and chickens (11, 12). Similarly, virginiamycin has also been reported to induce gut microbial shifts in broiler chickens (13, 14). This microbial shift, mainly reported in the ileum, was characterized by an overrepresentation of species within the two genera Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium (13, 14). The latter is capable of producing propionate, a short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) that has immune modulatory capacity, and of binding aflatoxin B1, a major feed contaminant in the poultry industry, to reduce its uptake in the intestine (13). However, other studies have shown virginiamycin use to be strongly associated with increased colonization by opportunistic pathogens such as Clostridium perfringens, linked to higher mortality rates (15, 16).

The broiler chicken gut microbiome consists of a complex mixture of bacteria, archaea, viruses, and fungi that play a vital role in nutrient absorption, immunity, physiological development, and protection from pathogens (17). Previous studies have indicated that different functions are contained within each part of the digestive system as a result of differences in microbial communities harbored in each organ (18, 19). The small intestine microbiota is well delineated, in particular the ileum microbiota, which is dominated by lactobacilli, enterococci, and S. xylosus (18, 20). Several factors, such as changes in diet, housing, temperature, and antibiotics, have been shown to affect microbial composition (21). Furthermore, AGPs have been shown to result in morphological changes in the gut, such as a distinct reduction in gut weight and wall thickness, which could contribute to an increased nutritional uptake (22, 23).

Concerns related to the impact of AGP use in poultry farming on the spread of antimicrobial resistance have been raised (24, 25), and as a precautionary measure the usage of virginiamycin and flavophospholipol was banned in 1999 and 2006, respectively, in the European Union (EU) (26), but they are still frequently used as AGPs outside the EU. Previous studies have investigated the effect of individual AGPs on the broiler chicken microbiome, but interventional studies comparing the effect of multiple AGPs in a controlled setting are rare (6). Moreover, broiler chickens live up to approximately 6 weeks before they are slaughtered, while previous studies have reported microbial changes at different broiler ages that could influence outcome and prevent interstudy comparisons. Here, we conducted a prospective controlled intervention study where newborn broiler chickens were followed from the time of hatching up to 6 weeks to investigate the effects of flavophospholipol or virginiamycin use on the ileum microbiota by utilizing 16S rRNA gene profiling. We here describe overlapping but also discrete changes in dominant bacterial taxa within the gut microbiota as a result of flavophospholipol or virginiamycin supplementation at distinct ages.

RESULTS

The diversity and composition of the broiler chicken ileal microbiota evolve with age.

A controlled intervention study with three arms was conducted on 180 male broiler chickens during a 6-week period to assess the impact of flavophospholipol and virginiamycin on the ileal and cecal microbiota (Fig. 1). Sixty chickens randomly divided over 10 pens were included in each arm, where they received either 15 ppm flavophospholipol, 20 ppm virginiamycin, or no AGP supplementation. Twenty chickens were sacrificed in each arm, and ileal and cecal contents were collected at day 8 (D8), 28 (D28), and 39 (D39) to assess longitudinal microbial development. One chicken died in the control group prior to D8, one in the flavophospholipol-supplemented group prior to D28, and two in the virginiamycin-supplemented group prior to D8. An additional two samples were lost in the flavophospholipol-supplemented group at D8 due to failure of collection or insufficient sample material. A pilot analysis of ileal and cecal samples collected at different time points in each arm revealed a more profound impact on the ileal microbiota (data not shown). As a result, only analyses concerning the ileal microbial impact are described in this study.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Design of the controlled intervention study investigating the impact of flavophospholipol (FLAV, 15 ppm) and virginiamycin (VIRG, 20 ppm) on the ileum microbiota in broiler chickens. In total, 60 chickens were included in each treatment arm of the study, and 20 each were sacrificed at three distinct time points: after 8 days (D8), 28 days (D28), and 39 days (D39). One chicken died in the control group prior to D8, one in the flavophospholipol-supplemented group prior to D28, and two in the virginiamycin-supplemented group prior to D8. An additional two samples were lost in the flavophospholipol-supplemented group at D8 due to failure of collection or insufficient sample material. Ileal and cecal content was collected at each time point for further analysis using 16S rRNA gene profiling.

To investigate the evolution of the ileum microbiota over time, alpha and beta diversities were compared at three different time points, D8, D28, and D39, in broiler chickens that did not receive any AGP supplementation. The richness was found to be higher at D39 than at D8 and D28; however, no difference was observed in evenness or overall alpha diversity (Fig. 2A to C). Multidimensional scaling analysis further revealed that the microbial composition changed drastically over time (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2D and E; see also Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). In particular, samples from D8 were distinct from latter time points when described by both weighted and unweighted UniFrac principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) (Fig. 2D and E).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Microbial diversity and composition in ileum of untreated broiler chickens evolve with age. Microbial diversities and compositions were compared at three time points in this study, at days 8 (D8, light green), 28 (D28, medium green), and 39 (D39, dark green). Alpha diversity described by the Ace (A), Simpson evenness (B), and inverse Simpson (C) indices indicates that the overall diversity increases with age. This increase is largely attributed to increased species richness (Ace), whereas the evenness (Simpson evenness) remains stable over time. Differences in microbial composition were demonstrated using principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of unweighted (D) and weighted (E) UniFrac beta diversity, revealing that the ileum microbiota changes vastly over time. For detailed information on distinct taxa driving microbial differences reflected in the PCoA, see Table S2 in the supplemental material.

TABLE S1

AMOVA and ANOSIM analysis of the control group split over day 8, 28, or 39 (D8, D28, and D39, respectively). Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (10.4KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Identification of driving taxa in principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances. Specific OTUs associated with individual coordinates/axes in conducted principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) was determined with an absolute correlation value of >0.7 and a P value of <0.05. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (9.9KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that changed distinctly in abundance over time were further classified into distinct types with single-nucleotide resolution using oligotyping (Table S3). The microbial community at D8 was dominated by one OTU classified as Enterococcus spp. (closest to E. hirae/E. villorum/E. ratti/E. faecium/E. durans) that comprised more than 50% of the average overall abundance (Table 1). Members of the lactobacilli were found to be the second most abundant community (including species within the Lactobacillus, Limosilactobacillus, and Ligilactobacillus genera) wherein several species were detected and classified into several distinct OTUs. Of these, Lactobacillus johnsonii (Otu2) was predominant and formed 19% of the overall microbial community, followed by Lactobacillus crispatus/Lactobacillus gallinarum (Otu5). Additionally, Limosilactobacillus reuteri (Otu8, formerly known as Lactobacillus reuteri) and Ligilactobacillus salivarius (Otu10, formerly known as Lactobacillus salivarius) corresponded to 5% of the overall abundance together with L. crispatus/L. gallinarum (Fig. S1). The third most abundant genus was Streptococcus, representing 13% of the chicken’s early microbial community, dominated by one OTU closest to S. pasteurianus/S. infantarius/S. alactolyticus/S. macedonicus.

TABLE 1.

Distinctly altered OTUs (P < 0.05) in the ileal broiler microbiota in the control group at days 8, 28, and 39 identified by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LDA ≥ 3.0) and Metastatsa

Genus OTU Avg abundance (%)
Metastats, P value
LEfSe
D8 D28 D39 CNTL, D8 vs D28 CNTL, D8 vs D39 CNTL, D28 vs D39 Class LDA P value
Enterococcus Otu1 54.8 0.5 0.7 0.001 0.001 0.359 D8 5.4 0
Lactobacillus Otu2 19.7 46.1 6.1 0.001 0.001 0.001 D28 5.2 0
Staphylococcus Otu4 0.1 8.3 12.7 0.001 0.001 0.336 D39 4.7 0
Clostridiales Otu3 0 1.7 0.4 0.001 0.001 0.08 D28 4 0
Lactobacillus Otu5 0.3 15.4 51.2 0.001 0.001 0.001 D39 5.4 0
Romboutsia Otu6 0 0.9 0.9 0.122 0.001 0.976 D28 4 0
Streptococcus Otu7 13.4 1 0.7 0.001 0.001 0.494 D8 4.7 0
Limosilactobacillus Otu8 1.8 15.4 14.4 0.001 0.001 0.783 D28 4.9 0
Lachnospiraceae Otu9 2.1 1.8 0.2 0.825 0.001 0.019 D8 4.3 0
Ligilactobacillus Otu10 2 0.1 0.5 0.001 0.137 0.555 D8 3.9 0
Lachnospiraceae Otu810 0.2 0 0 0.001 0.001 0.027 D8 3.3 0
Corynebacterium Otu13 0 0.7 3.1 0.001 0.001 0.005 D39 4.1 0
Blautia Otu15 1 0 0 0.001 0.001 0.064 D8 3.7 0
Brachybacterium Otu17 0 0.3 1.6 0.001 0.001 0.013 D39 3.8 0
Lactococcus Otu16 0 0.8 1.1 0.001 0.001 0.451 D39 3.7 0
Clostridium sensu stricto Otu21 0 0 1.5 0.449 0.001 0.001 D39 3.8 0
Escherichia/Shigella Otu32 0.6 0.1 0 0.007 0.001 0.407 D8 3.7 0
Lachnospiraceae Otu36 0.2 0.1 0 0.405 0.005 0.003 D8 3.2 0.002
Bifidobacterium Otu40 0.2 0 0 0.001 0.007 0.2 D8 3.4 0
Streptococcus Otu50 0 0.5 0.1 0.001 0.001 0.006 D28 3.4 0
Brevibacterium Otu55 0 0.1 0.4 0.071 0.001 0.025 D39 3.4 0
Lachnospiraceae Otu909 0.2 0.1 0 0.199 0.007 0.191 D8 3.2 0.007
Anaerostipes Otu59 0.2 0 0 0.178 0.13 0.692 D8 3.2 0.011
Limosilactobacillus Otu63 0 0.7 0.2 0.001 0.001 0.213 D28 3.4 0
Staphylococcus Otu66 0 0 0.4 0.001 0.001 0.002 D39 3.2 0
Blautia Otu1041 0.2 0 0 0.086 0.005 0.026 D8 3.4 0.028
Limosilactobacillus Otu91 0 0.2 0.2 0.001 0.001 0.517 D39 3.1 0
Rhodopseudomonas Otu94 0 0 0.2 0.09 0.001 0.001 D39 3 0
Ligilactobacillus Otu109 0 0.4 0.3 0.001 0.001 0.527 D28 3.2 0
a

Abbreviations: CNTL, control; D8, day 8; D28, day 28; D39, day 39; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; LEfSe, LDA effect size.

FIG S1

Stacked bar plots of the taxonomic composition of the most abundant OTUs, grouped by day of sacrifice (D8, D28, or D39). Download FIG S1, DOCX file, 0.3 MB (350.7KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Classification of OTUs of interest using oligotyping. OTUs of interest identified to be distinctly associated with control, flavophospholipol, or virginiamycin broilers at day 8, 28, or 39 were classified into distinct types using oligotyping. Taxonomical classification of each identified type was assigned using NCBI nucleotide BLAST. Only hits with a percent identity of ≥97.0% were considered valid. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (11.3KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The microbial composition underwent a shift during growth (D28 and D39), with a natural reduction in abundance of Enterococcus and Streptococcus spp. (P = 0.001) and a concomitant increase in lactate-producing bacteria at later time points. These time points were dominated by lactobacilli in particular with an overall relative abundance of approximately 75% at both D28 and D39. Yet, there was a drastic difference in composition among the Lactobacillus spp. between D28 and D39. In particular, L. johnsonii was more abundant at D28 (P < 0.001) and L. crispatus/L. gallinarum at D39 (P < 0.001). Additionally, the relative abundance of Staphylococcus xylosus (Otu4) also increased (P < 0.001) with age and reached approximately 10% at both D28 and D39, and a similar trend was observed for Corynebacterium (Otu13, Fig. S1).

Predictive metabolomic profiling of these microbial compositions identified several pathways to be distinctly represented at D8 in the control group. These included amino acid biosynthesis of glycogen, starch, and lactate and those linked to degradation of lactose and sugar. At the later time points, peptidoglycan and amino acid biosynthesis, fatty acid degradation, and several fatty acid and alcohol fermentation processes were found to be more active (Table S4).

TABLE S4

PICRUSt analysis showing distinctly altered pathways in the ileal broiler microbiota in the control (CNTL) group at days 8, 28, and 39 (D8, D28, and D39, respectively). Download Table S4, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (38.6KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Virginiamycin, but not flavophospholipol, supplementation decreases microbial diversity, increases richness, and alters community composition.

To assess the impact of virginiamycin and flavophospholipol supplementations on the ileal flora, alpha diversity was compared with control chickens at each time point (Fig. 3). Virginiamycin-treated chickens were found to have higher richness, which was particularly pronounced at D8 and D39 (P = 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the flavophospholipol and control groups. The overall alpha diversity and evenness were found to be lower for the virginiamycin group than for flavophospholipol and control chickens (P = 0.02 and P= 0.04 for D28 evenness and D39 inverse Simpson, respectively). This might indicate that the microbial community became richer but more uneven over time.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

The ileal microbiota of the broiler chicken supplemented with virginiamycin (VIRG) and flavophospholipol (FLAV) evolves similarly to the control group (CNTL) with age. Alpha diversity expressed by the Ace (A), Simpson evenness (B), and inverse Simpson (C) indices indicates that richness increases over time, whereas overall diversity and evenness remain more stable over time for virginiamycin- and flavophospholipol-supplemented broilers. Statistical tests were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and P values were adjusted for multiple testing using Bonferroni correction. D8, day 8; D28, day 28; D39, day 39. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

By comparing the beta diversity between groups (analysis of molecular variance [AMOVA] and analysis of similarity [ANOSIM]), it was found that the microbial composition was distinct between the three groups at different time points (Table S5). Specifically, the microbial composition of the virginiamycin group was distinct from both control and flavophospholipol chickens at all time points (P ≤ 0.045), whereas the microbial composition of the flavophospholipol and control groups differed only at D39 (P < 0.001). Multidimensional scaling analysis similarly showed that control and flavophospholipol-supplemented chickens harbored similar microbial profiles as they clustered together at each of the three time points and were primarily distinguished by lactobacilli and Enterococcus, Blautia, and Staphylococcus spp. (Fig. 4, Table S2, and Fig. S2). Virginiamycin-supplemented chickens clustered separately from both control and flavophospholipol-supplemented chickens at each time point, although at D39, microbial composition of flavophospholipol-supplemented broilers was more similar to that of virginiamycin-supplemented broilers than to controls (Fig. 4).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Ileal microbial composition evolves with age in untreated broiler chickens (green) and chickens treated with flavophospholipol (FLAV, 15 ppm, orange) and virginiamycin (VIRG, 20 ppm, blue). Differences in microbial composition were visualized using multidimensional scaling analysis of weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances of samples collected at days 8 (D8), 28 (D28), and 39 (D39). D8 samples are shown in panels A and B; D28 samples in panels C and D; and D39 samples in panels E and F for unweighted and weighted UniFrac, respectively. For detailed information on distinct taxa driving microbial differences reflected in the PCoA, see Table S2 in the supplemental material.

FIG S2

Ileal microbial composition evolves with age in untreated broiler chickens (green) and chickens treated with flavophospholipol (FLAV, 15 ppm, orange) and virginiamycin (VIRG, 20 ppm, blue). Differences in microbial composition were visualized using multidimensional scaling analysis of weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances of samples collected at days 8 (D8), 28 (D28), and 39 (D39). The three time points are illustrated using unweighted UniFrac in panel A and weighted UniFrac in panel B. Download FIG S2, DOCX file, 0.6 MB (651.4KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S5

AMOVA and ANOSIM analysis of control (CNTL), flavophospholipol (FLAV), or virginiamycin (VIRG) broilers at days 8, 28, or 39 (D8, D28, and D39, respectively). Download Table S5, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (9.5KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Differential abundant OTUs were identified across treatment groups at all time points and stratified into distinct types using oligotyping (Table S3). At D8, the control group was found to harbor elevated levels of Streptococcus and Enterococcus spp. compared to the flavophospholipol- and virginiamycin-supplemented groups, where the enterococcal abundance was higher in chicks supplemented with flavophospholipol than in those supplemented with virginiamycin (Table 2). Additionally, the virginiamycin group was characterized by a reduced abundance of L. salivarius and elevated abundances of members of the Clostridia class, such as Lachnospiraceae (including Blautia spp.), Clostridium sensu stricto, and Clostridium XVIII. Moreover, Escherichia/Shigella and Corynebacterium spp., L. crispatus, and L. reuteri were also more abundant in the virginiamycin group than in the flavophospholipol and control groups (Fig. 5 and Fig. S1).

TABLE 2.

Distinctly altered OTUs (P < 0.05) in the ileal broiler microbiota in the control, flavophospholipol, and virginiamycin groups at days 8, 28, and 39 identified by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LDA ≥ 3.0) and Metastatsa

Taxonomy OTU Avg abundance (%)
Metastats, P value
LEfSe
CNTL FLAV VIRG FLAV vs CNTL VIRG vs CNTL VIRG vs FLAV Class LDA P value
D8
Enterococcus Otu1 54.8 53.8 31.7 0.93 0.03 0.03 CNTL 5.2 0.036
Lactobacillus Otu5 0.3 1.3 3.1 0.34 0 0.41 VIRG 4.2 0.003
Streptococcus Otu7 13.4 0.9 0.3 0 0 0.11 CNTL 4.8 0
Limosilactobacillus Otu8 1.8 1.4 7.7 0.66 0.03 0.03 VIRG 4.7 0.017
Lachnospiraceae Otu9 2.1 1.7 6.6 0.8 0.01 0 VIRG 4.4 0.001
Ligilactobacillus Otu10 2 4 0.1 0.6 0 0 FLAV 4.2 0
Blautia Otu15 1 0.3 1.5 0.12 0.5 0 VIRG 3.8 0.004
Lachnospiraceae Otu19 0.7 0.3 1.9 0.21 0.07 0 VIRG 3.9 0.028
Lactococcus Otu16 0 0 0.3 0.2 0 0 VIRG 3.1 0
Lachnospiraceae Otu20 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.85 0.01 0.05 VIRG 3.1 0.004
Blautia Otu22 0 0.1 0.7 0.13 0 0 VIRG 3.6 0
Escherichia/Shigella Otu32 0.6 0.7 2.7 0.7 0 0.01 VIRG 3.9 0
Clostridium XVIII Otu33 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.06 0.02 VIRG 3.1 0.002
Lachnospiraceae Otu36 0.2 0 0.2 0.16 0.93 0.01 CNTL 3 0.033
Clostridium sensu stricto Otu37 0.1 0 0.4 0.24 0.51 0.01 VIRG 3.1 0.01
Lachnospiraceae Otu51 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.57 0 0 VIRG 3.5 0
Anaerostipes Otu59 0.2 0 0.4 0.26 0.23 0 VIRG 3.2 0.001
Blautia Otu1041 0.2 0.1 0 0.23 0.05 0.13 CNTL 3.2 0.014
Clostridium sensu stricto Otu75 0 0 0.5 0.01 0 0 VIRG 3.5 0
Ralstonia Otu160 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 VIRG 3 0
D28
Lactobacillus Otu2 46.1 41.2 67.5 0.5 0.01 0 VIRG 5 0.003
Romboutsia Otu6 0.9 0.1 0 0.68 0.12 0.01 CNTL 3.6 0.032
Streptococcus Otu7 1 0.3 0 0.07 0 0 CNTL 3.7 0
Faecalibacterium Otu11 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.92 0.97 0.99 VIRG 3.9 0.001
Ligilactobacillus Otu10 0.1 0.3 0 0.29 0 0 FLAV 3.1 0
Corynebacterium Otu13 0.7 3.5 1.7 0.01 0.21 0.16 FLAV 4.2 0.034
Peptostreptococcaceae Otu14 1.5 0.1 0 0.79 0 0 CNTL 3.9 0
Subdoligranulum Otu18 0 0.3 0.1 0.16 0.49 0.49 FLAV 3.2 0.048
Lactococcus Otu16 0.8 0.1 0.2 0 0.21 0.31 CNTL 3.5 0.001
Streptococcus Otu50 0.5 0.4 0 0.76 0 0 CNTL 3.4 0
Limosilactobacillus Otu63 0.7 0.1 0 0.03 0 0 CNTL 3.5 0
Bacteria Otu83 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 VIRG 3.5 0
Ligilactobacillus Otu109 0.4 0.2 0 0.52 0 0 CNTL 3.3 0
D39
Lactobacillus Otu2 6.1 22 45.8 0 0 0 VIRG 5.3 0
Lactobacillus Otu5 51.2 24.2 5.4 0 0 0 CNTL 5.4 0
Streptococcus Otu7 0.7 0.3 0 0.15 0 0.04 CNTL 3.6 0
Limosilactobacillus Otu8 14.4 15.7 7.6 0.7 0.02 0.02 FLAV 4.7 0.008
Lachnospiraceae Otu9 0.2 0.7 1.4 0.25 0 0.21 VIRG 3.8 0.018
Ligilactobacillus Otu10 0.5 0.2 0 0.47 0 0 CNTL 3.5 0
Lactococcus Otu16 1.1 0.3 1.4 0.01 0.73 0.16 VIRG 3.8 0.003
Clostridium sensu stricto Otu21 1.5 0.3 0 0.02 0 0 CNTL 3.8 0
Blautia Otu22 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.28 0 0.04 VIRG 3.2 0.006
Streptococcus Otu50 0.1 0.3 0 0.19 0 0 FLAV 3.1 0
Limosilactobacillus Otu63 0.2 0 0 0.48 0 0 CNTL 3 0
Bacteria Otu83 0.1 0 0.3 0.4 0 0 VIRG 3.1 0
Limosilactobacillus Otu91 0.2 0.3 0 0.86 0 0 FLAV 3.2 0
Ligilactobacillus Otu109 0.3 0.3 0 0.72 0 0 FLAV 3.2 0
a

Abbreviations: CNTL, control; FLAV, flavophospholipol; VIRG, virginiamycin; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; LEfSe, LDA effect size; D8, day 8; D28, day 28; D39, day 39.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Microbial composition changes with age in flavophospholipol- (FLAV) and virginiamycin-supplemented (VIRG) and control (CNTL) broilers. OTUs differentially abundant between the treatment groups for each time point were identified, and their rarified read counts (log2 transformed) were visualized in a heatmap (A). Relative abundances of the most dominant taxa at each time point were further compared between treatment groups using stacked bar plots (B), clearly showing that the composition is dependent on AGP as well as time point. D8, day 8; D28, day 28; D39, day 39.

At D28, virginiamycin group samples were characterized by elevated levels of L. johnsonii and Faecalibacterium spp. (Otu11), whereas the flavophospholipol group was characterized by elevated levels of Corynebacterium spp. and L. salivarius, and the control group by taxa belonging to the Streptococcaceae and Peptostreptococcaceae families (including, e.g., Romboutsia spp.).

Ultimately, at D39, L. crispatus/L. gallinarum and L. salivarius as well as S. pasteurianus/S. infantarius/S. alactolyticus/S. macedonicus had distinctly higher relative abundance in the control group than in the flavophospholipol and virginiamycin groups. Flavophospholipol-treated chickens harbored elevated levels of L. reuteri and Streptococcus spp., while Lachnospiraceae members (including Blautia spp.), and L. johnsonii were more abundant in the virginiamycin group than in the other two (Fig. 5). The differences in composition of the most dominant members among the lactobacilli across each treatment group at the three time points are illustrated in Fig. 6.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Lactobacillus dynamics in the ileal microbiota in the broiler chicken are both age and AGP dependent. Relative abundances of members of the Lactobacillus community in the control (CNTL), flavophospholipol (FLAV), and virginiamycin (VIRG) groups at days 8 (D8) (A), 28 (D28) (B), and 39 (D39) (C) were visualized using Circos, indicating the shifting dynamics of the species harbored within.

AGP supplementation influences metabolic activity at D8 and D39.

Functional assessment of the microbial changes was performed for both the virginiamycin and flavophospholipol groups at each time point, which revealed differences between the AGP-supplemented chickens and the control group at D8 and D39 for virginiamycin, whereas no differences were observed at D28 (Table S6). At D8, both virginiamycin- and flavophospholipol-supplemented chickens harbored microbiotas with lower galactose degradation and secondary metabolite biosynthesis, driven mainly by the higher abundance of Streptococcus spp. Additional differences in metabolic activity observed between AGP groups were unique to each group.

TABLE S6

PICRUSt analysis showing distinctly altered pathways in the ileal broiler microbiota in the control (CNTL), flavophospholipol (FLAV), and virginiamycin (VIRG) groups at days 8, 28, and 39 (D8, D28, and D39, respectively). Download Table S6, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (40.4KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The microbiota within the flavophospholipol group had substantially lower activity in pathways linked to glycan and starch degradation, mainly due to lower abundances of Streptococcus spp., as well as ergothioneine biosynthesis at D8, whereas the control group was more characterized by activity in pathways linked to folic acid, vitamin, and amino acid biosynthesis. Virginiamycin-supplemented chickens, on the other hand, harbored a microbiota associated with elevated metabolic activity linked to biosynthesis of amino acids (particularly tryptophan as a result of elevated levels of enterococcal and Lachnospiraceae spp.), ubiquinol/menaquinol (linked to L. johnsonii), and fatty acids (particularly mycolate and palmitoleate, linked to higher abundances of L. johnsonii, L. reuteri, and Lachnospiraceae spp.) at D8. Additionally, nucleoside (particularly adenosine and guanosine) and sugar (particularly xylose and glucose) degradation was potentially more common in the virginiamycin-supplemented group at D8 than in the other groups also due to the observed higher abundances of L. johnsonii, L. reuteri, and Lachnospiraceae spp.

At D39, distinct differences in metabolic activity were observed only between the control and virginiamycin groups, whereas flavophospholipol-supplemented animals harbored metabolic activity resembling both the control and virginiamycin groups with smaller intermediate changes. The virginiamycin-supplemented group was characterized by higher activity in pathways linked to pentose phosphate (mainly linked to L. johnsonii), biosynthesis of menaquinol (linked to L. johnsonii and L. reuteri), and degradation of the sugars d-galacturonate (linked to L. reuteri and Lachnospiraceae spp.) and fructose and rhamnose (linked to Enterococcus spp.), and uronic acids (particularly hexuronate and galacturonate, linked to Enterococcus spp.). In relation to the virginiamycin-supplemented animal group, the control group was characterized by biosynthesis of amino acids (particularly lysine and threonine), unsaturated fatty acids (particularly vaccinate and gondoate), and degradation of sucrose as a result of elevated abundances of L. crispatus/L. gallinarum.

DISCUSSION

The broiler chicken gut microbiota plays an essential role in animal health and development. The use of AGPs is common in order to enhance growth, but their effect on the gut microbiota and the resulting impact on metabolic activity are largely unknown. Therefore, this controlled intervention study aimed to assess the effect of two commonly used AGPs, namely, virginiamycin (20 ppm) and flavophospholipol (15 ppm), on the broiler chicken microbiota over a period of 6 weeks. Our preliminary results suggested that the AGP-induced alterations were more substantial in the ileum and were consistent with earlier studies showing the proximal gut microbiota to be more susceptible to antibiotics than the distal gut (27, 28). Therefore, we focused on the ileum microbiota in this study.

By comparing microbial compositions in longitudinally collected samples from the broiler chicken ileum at three distinct time points (D8, D28, and D39), we showed that the ileal microbiota at D8 was primarily dominated by enterococci, lactobacilli, and Streptococcus spp., accounting for approximately 90% of the overall community. Lactobacilli (formerly collectively classified as members within the Lactobacillus genus) were largely composed of Lactobacillus johnsonii, Lactobacillus crispatus/Lactobacillus gallinarum, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius and corroborated previous studies describing the ileal microbiota within the first week of life (29). With age (at D28 and D39), the relative abundance of Enterococcus spp. decreased and the abundance of lactobacilli increased, the latter constituting approximately 70% of the microbial community. At these ages, an increased dominance of lactobacilli, primarily of L. johnsonii, L. crispatus/L. gallinarum, and L. reuteri was observed, whereas the L. salivarius relative abundance was reduced compared to that at D8, in accordance with previous findings (9, 30, 31). We observed further rearrangements within the Lactobacillus community between D28 and D39 (mainly from L. johnsonii to L. crispatus/L. gallinarum). This dynamic shift in lactobacilli has also been observed in the chicken ileum microbiota at day 42 compared to day 21 (31). Lactobacilli overall enhance protease trypsin and lipase enzymatic activity (32), where L. salivarius additionally has the ability to stimulate butyrate-producing bacteria and to reestablish the balance of the microbiota (33). It has been hypothesized previously that this might be attributed to the spatial environment maturation including pH, osmolarity, atmosphere, and availability of bacterial substrates (34). Thus, this genus plays an essential role in regulating starch metabolism and lactate fermentation and also in providing colonization resistance against pathogens, such as Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and C. perfringens (35).

When investigating the impact of the two AGPs on the ileal microbiota, we found an AGP-specific effect on both microbial composition and metabolic activity which persisted over time. Both AGPs exhibit activity against Gram-positive bacteria (5, 36), yet the observed effect of virginiamycin on Gram-positive bacteria was more disruptive in this study. This was exemplified by a reduction of Gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus spp. and members of the Peptostreptococcaceae family. Virginiamycin further affected the relative abundances of Faecalibacterium spp. and Enterococcus spp., whereas they remained unaffected by flavophospholipol. Additional taxa, primarily Clostridiales members such as Blautia spp., Lachnospiraceae spp., Clostridium sensu stricto spp., and Clostridium XVIII spp., were found to increase drastically after virginiamycin exposure, whereas flavophospholipol treatment resulted in no or minor changes. Members of the Clostridiales order, particularly Lachnospiraceae spp., are producers of SCFAs such as formic and butyric acid. These SCFAs play an important role in cellulose and starch degradation and provide colonization resistance against pathogens in poultry (18), which partially explains the mode of action of virginiamycin as a growth promoter.

In this study, AGP exposure resulted in adaptations of lactobacilli characterized by a dynamic shift between the different species within this taxon, driven by competitive exclusion as also observed previously (28). Lactobacilli facilitate uptake of the SCFA butyrate, produced by other bacteria, by intestinal epithelial cells (37). Butyrate maintains intestinal epithelial integrity, ameliorates mucosal inflammation, and stimulates electrolyte (NaCl) absorption, playing an important role in gut health (38, 39), and its impairment could result in intestinal inflammatory diseases. Further, butyrate is involved in regulation of inflammation, cell differentiation, and apoptosis in the host. In this study, virginiamycin-supplemented chickens were characterized by a higher abundance of L. johnsonii and a depletion of other lactobacilli, namely, L. crispatus/L. gallinarum, L. reuteri, and L. salivarius. For flavophospholipol, such a disruption in lactobacilli was reported only at D39, with high levels of L. johnsonii and a depletion of L. crispatus and L. gallinarum. However, in contrast to virginiamycin-supplemented broilers, no distinct alterations in L. reuteri or L. salivarius abundances were found. L. salivarius is a probiotic bacterium associated with a microbiota with increased butyrate production after supplementation, indicating its role in a healthy microbial flora (40, 41). This enrichment of L. johnsonii after virginiamycin exposure might indicate an intrinsic resistance to protein synthesis inhibitors, in contrast to several other lactobacilli (42, 43).

Although early hypotheses suggested that AGPs exhibit their effect by diminishing microbial presence in the gut and thus rendering more nutrients available for the host (44), recent theories suggest more complex underlying mechanisms. AGPs are likely to promote a balanced microbiota less likely to trigger immune and inflammatory responses, thereby inhibiting subclinical infections and increasing the bioavailability of nutrients (45). In this study (45), both the flavophospholipol- and virginiamycin-supplemented microbiota displayed reduced galactose degradation compared to the control. Previous studies have reported an increased weight gain as a result of larger amounts of galactose in food (46), indicating a possibly increased bioavailability of galactose as a result of AGP supplementation. Furthermore, flavophospholipol-supplemented broilers displayed higher ergothioneine biosynthesis compared to the other groups at D8. This amino acid is not naturally synthesized by animals and is believed to play a role in free radical scavenging and inflammatory modulation after being taken up by the animal tissue (47). Additionally, the flavophospholipol-supplemented broiler microbiota showed a potentially reduced starch and glycan degradation compared to other groups, indicating a possible increase in bioavailability for the host.

Virginiamycin-supplemented broilers similarly showed possible increases in nutrient bioavailability after supplementation. Metabolism of amino acids (primarily tryptophan), fatty acid biosynthesis, and sugar and carbohydrate degradation in virginiamycin-supplemented broilers were higher, supporting a previous report (45). This study argues that increased levels of tryptophan are accompanied by increased kynurenine, reduction in serotonin, and a possible decrease in ileum movement that allows prolonged nutrient absorption as a result (45). Additionally, ubiquinol-enhanced biosynthesis in the virginiamycin-treated broilers may play an anti-inflammatory role (48), allowing for a better environment for nutrient intake. Finally, at D39, virginiamycin-supplemented broilers displayed increased activity in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), where PPP metabolite-elevated flux is suggested to facilitate muscle growth and regeneration in chickens (49).

While both virginiamycin and flavophospholipol resulted in altered metabolic activity, possibly increasing the bioavailability of essential nutrients, virginiamycin-supplemented broilers also displayed an increased relative abundance of opportunistic pathogens. At D8, virginiamycin-supplemented broilers harbored elevated levels of Clostridium perfringens similar to what has been reported previously and with a suggested impact on mortality (15). Furthermore, virginiamycin-supplemented broilers harbored elevated levels of Campylobacter and Escherichia/Shigella spp. at D8 and D28. Previous reports indicate that this contributes to the intrinsic resistance of E. coli to virginiamycin, which could explain their increase as a result of the elimination of other sensitive bacteria. Although E. coli can naturally exist in low abundances in the chicken microbiota (34), certain strains can cause disease when exhibiting specific virulence traits of avian pathogenicity (50).

In this controlled intervention study, we have utilized a virginiamycin dose similar to those used in food animal farming whereas the flavophospholipol dose was slightly higher. Although the trial design is similar to the regular farming environment, the experimental design does not mimic the exact condition seen in food production where stress is induced by housing of thousands of animals. Setting up a controlled study under such conditions is costly and thereby not feasible for such a detailed investigation into the ileal microbiota of the broiler chicken. Thus, it was not possible to capture the actual stress levels the animals might be exposed to resulting in higher loads of pathogens than observed here as well as increased mortality rates.

This study provides a first head-to-head comparison of the effect of the two AGPs flavophospholipol and virginiamycin on the broiler chicken ileum microbiota over time. Here, virginiamycin was revealed to have an immediate and prolonged effect on microbial composition and metabolic activity in the broiler ileum persisting until D39. Although an altered microbial composition was observed in flavophospholipol-supplemented broilers at D39, the observed differences were milder than in those exposed to virginiamycin. Both AGPs resulted in metabolic changes potentially resulting in increased anti-inflammatory mechanisms as well as nutrient bioavailability of several essential nutrients, either by decreasing their degradation (primarily after flavophospholipol supplementation) or by increasing their biosynthesis (primarily after virginiamycin supplementation). A head-to-head comparison indicates a small benefit in using flavophospholipol over virginiamycin as the two have been shown to result in similar weight gains, whereas virginiamycin results in more extensive perturbations in ileal microbial composition and increased colonization with potentially pathogenic bacteria such as Campylobacter spp., Clostridium perfringens, and Escherichia coli, which could impact broiler mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design and sample collection.

A 39-day controlled intervention study assessing the impact on the ileal and cecal microbiota of the broiler chicken was performed in Bocholt, Belgium, during 2015. A total of 180 male broiler chickens purchased from a commercial vendor were randomly divided into three groups and studied for a period of 6 weeks. The animals were randomly divided over 30 pens in the same room. The different groups were fed ad libitum with starter feed from day 1 to 14 and grower and finished feed from day 15 to 39 supplemented with either flavophospholipol (15 ppm), virginiamycin (20 ppm), or control (without APG supplementation); see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material.

FIG S3

Rarefaction curves of sequenced samples within the study. Download FIG S3, DOCX file, 0.2 MB (255.6KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Twenty chickens per supplementation group were sacrificed by a licensed veterinarian via cervical dislocation followed by dissection at three defined time points, day 8 (D8), day 28 (D28), and day 39 (D39), where ileal and cecal samples were collected into stool collection tubes (Sarstedt; catalog no. 80.734.001). One chicken died in the control group prior to D8, one in the flavophospholipol-supplemented group prior to D28, and two in the virginiamycin-supplemented group prior to D8. An additional two samples were lost in the flavophospholipol-supplemented group at D8 due to failure of collection or insufficient sample material. Collected samples were refrigerated until transportation to the Laboratory of Medical Microbiology (LMM), University of Antwerp, could be arranged. Transportation was arranged on the same day as samples were collected at each time point and stored at −80°C until further processing. After a pilot analysis of the collected samples, it was decided to proceed only with the ileum samples as these were found to be more sensitive to the effect of the investigated AGPs (data not shown).

DNA extraction and quality control.

Samples were thawed in batches, and 500 mg ileal or cecal content was weighed and added to a 2-ml lysing matrix E tube to extract the total metagenomic DNA using the FastDNA spin kit (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An additional purification step was performed with the DNA Clean and Concentrator kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) before the DNA concentration was determined with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer utilizing the double-stranded DNA high-sensitivity assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

16S rRNA gene amplification, library preparation, and sequencing.

PCR amplification of the V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using standard Illumina fusion primers (341F and 802R) with 2× Kapa HiFi Hot Start Ready mix (Kapa Biosystems) as master mix using the following cycling parameters: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and elongation at 72°C for 10 min in triplicates of each sample. Multiplexed libraries were prepared with the Nextera XT kit (Illumina Inc., USA) and sequenced using MiSeq V2 chemistry with 500 cycles with 2 × 250-bp paired-end sequencing. The sequencing data were processed and demultiplexed using Illumina CASAVA (1.8.2), and adapters were trimmed with skewer v.0.1.116.

Data analysis.

The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data preprocessing was conducted using the OCToPUS pipeline (51). In summary, contigs were created by heuristically merging paired-end reads in mothur v1.39 (52) based on the Phred quality score of both reads. Contigs were aligned to the SILVA v.132 database (53) and filtered from (i) those with ambiguous bases, (ii) those with more than 8 homopolymers, (iii) those with a length below 390, and (iv) those not corresponding to the V3-V4 region. The aligned sequences were filtered and dereplicated while sequencing errors were removed using the IPED v1.0 algorithm, which is dedicated to denoising MiSeq amplicon sequencing data (54). Chimera removal was performed with our in-house-developed tool called CATCh v1.0 (55) in de novo mode. Sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with the USEARCH v8.1.186 implementation of UPARSE (56) using the default settings. Taxonomic classification was performed using the RDP database v.18 (57). Rarefaction curves were constructed to assess saturation, and samples were rarefied to the smallest sample size to homogenize the sequencing depth allowing proper statistical comparison (Fig. S3).

Various alpha diversity indices, such as Ace, inverse Simpson, and Simpson evenness, together with the weighted and unweighted UniFrac beta diversity distances, were calculated in mothur. Statistical comparison of alpha diversity indices was conducted using either parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, and the P values were corrected for multiple testing using Bonferroni correction. Parametric testing was applied when both the normality (Shapiro’s test, using R shapiro.test) and homoscedasticity (Bartlett’s test, using R bartlett.test) were confirmed; otherwise, nonparametric testing was applied. Beta diversity distances were analyzed using multidimensional scaling by constructing principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots, and OTUs were correlated with the coordinates using the corr.axes command in mothur. Hypothesis testing was performed using AMOVA and ANOSIM (58), using weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances. Differentially abundant OTUs were assessed by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe [59]), and these identified OTUs were further assessed using metastats (60), which utilizes a nonparametric t test-like approach.

Further stratification of OTUs was conducted for OTUs of interest using oligotyping (61). Oligotyping can distinguish down to single-nucleotide differences in 16S rRNA gene sequences while disregarding sequencing errors. Identified oligotypes were further classified using NCBI nucleotide BLAST where sequences were classified as the best hit exceeding an identity of 97%. Functional analysis was conducted with PICRUSt2 v.2.1.3 (62) with the MetaCyc database v.24.5 (63) as reference where statistical comparisons between groups were conducted in STAMP v.2.1.3 (64). Pathway comparisons were performed using nonparametric testing and false-discovery rate (FDR) correction of P values. The pathways with P values of <0.05 and with a ratio of proportions exceeding 2 were reported.

Ethical approval.

All study-related activities in this project were conducted within the ethical regulations and standards set and carried out by the PVL (Agricultural Testing and Training Center, North Limburg, Belgium).

Data availability.

Sequence data generated in this study have been made available at the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) on NCBI under project number PRJNA679035.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was funded by Huvepharma. The funders had no role in data analysis and interpretation.

The following reagent was obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH, as part of the Human Microbiota Project: genomic DNA from microbial mock community B (staggered, low concentration), v5.2L, for 16S rRNA gene sequencing, HM-783D.

Author contributions: conceptualization – S.M.-K., H.G., V.H., S.P.; trial design – V.H., S.P., S.M.-K., H.G.; sample collection – V.H., S.P., S.D.B., C.L.; sequencing – B.B.X., C.L.; 16S data analysis – M.M., M.B.; writing original draft – M.M., M.B., S.K.-S., S.M.-K.; functional data analysis – S.K.-S., M.M. All authors read, gave input, and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar, Email: surbhi.malhotra@uantwerpen.be.

Jack A. Gilbert, University of California San Diego

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wang HL, Shi M, Xu X, Pan L, Zhao PF, Ma XK, Tian QY, Piao XS. 2016. Effects of flavomycin, Bacillus licheniformis and enramycin on performance, nutrient digestibility, gut morphology and the intestinal microflora of broilers. Jpn Poult Sci 53:128–135. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0150077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barrow PA. 1998. Use of virginiamycin as a growth promoter. Vet Rec 143:483–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van den Bogaard AE, Hazen M, Hoyer M, Oostenbach P, Stobberingh EE. 2002. Effects of flavophospholipol on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli and enterococci of fattening pigs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:110–118. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huber G. 1979. Moenomycin and related phosphorus-containing antibiotics, p 135–153. In Hahn FE (ed), Mechanism of action of antibacterial agents. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Butaye P, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F. 2003. Antimicrobial growth promoters used in animal feed: effects of less well known antibiotics on gram-positive bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 16:175–188. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.175-188.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Costa MC, Bessegatto JA, Alfieri AA, Weese JS, Filho JAB, Oba A. 2017. Different antibiotic growth promoters induce specific changes in the cecal microbiota membership of broiler chicken. PLoS One 12:e0171642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hughes P, Heritage J. 2004. Antibiotic growth-promoters in food animals, p 129–153. In Assessing quality and safety of animal feeds. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Latorre JD, Hernandez-Velasco X, Wolfenden RE, Vicente JL, Wolfenden AD, Menconi A, Bielke LR, Hargis BM, Tellez G. 2016. Evaluation and selection of Bacillus species based on enzyme production, antimicrobial activity, and biofilm synthesis as direct-fed microbial candidates for poultry. Front Vet Sci 3:95. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Han GG, Kim EB, Lee J, Lee J-Y, Jin G, Park J, Huh C-S, Kwon I-K, Kil DY, Choi Y-J, Kong C. 2016. Relationship between the microbiota in different sections of the gastrointestinal tract, and the body weight of broiler chickens. Springerplus 5:911. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2604-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pfaller MA. 2006. Flavophospholipol use in animals: positive implications for antimicrobial resistance based on its microbiologic properties. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 56:115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ni JJ, Ju TT, Piao XS. 2012. Effect of flavomycin on performance, gut morphology and intestinal microflora in broilers. J Anim Vet Adv 11:1669–1673. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.1669.1673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bolder NM, Wagenaar JA, Putirulan FF, Veldman KT, Sommer M. 1999. The effect of flavophospholipol (Flavomycin) and salinomycin sodium (Sacox) on the excretion of Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella enteritidis, and Campylobacter jejuni in broilers after experimental infection. Poult Sci 78:1681–1689. doi: 10.1093/ps/78.12.1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pourabedin M, Guan L, Zhao X. 2015. Xylo-oligosaccharides and virginiamycin differentially modulate gut microbial composition in chickens. Microbiome 3:15. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0079-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Danzeisen JL, Kim HB, Isaacson RE, Tu ZJ, Johnson TJ. 2011. Modulations of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment. PLoS One 6:e27949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.LaVorgna M, Schaeffer JL, Bade D, Dickson J, Cookson K, Davis SW. 2013. Performance of broilers fed a broader spectrum antibiotic (virginiamycin) or a narrower spectrum antibiotic (bacitracin methylene disalicylate) over 3 consecutive grow-out cycles. J Appl Poult Res 22:574–582. doi: 10.3382/japr.2012-00703. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kieke AL, Borchardt MA, Kieke BA, Spencer SK, Vandermause MF, Smith KE, Jawahir SL, Belongia EA, Marshfield Enterococcal Study Group . 2006. Use of streptogramin growth promoters in poultry and isolation of streptogramin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from humans. J Infect Dis 194:1200–1208. doi: 10.1086/508189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yeoman CJ, Chia N, Jeraldo P, Sipos M, Goldenfeld ND, White BA. 2012. The microbiome of the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Anim Health Res Rev 13:89–99. doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clavijo V, Flórez MJV. 2018. The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: a review. Poult Sci 97:1006–1021. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang P, Zhang Y, Xiao K, Jiang F, Wang H, Tang D, Liu D, Liu B, Liu Y, He X, Liu H, Liu X, Qing Z, Liu C, Huang J, Ren Y, Yun L, Yin L, Lin Q, Zeng C, Su X, Yuan J, Lin L, Hu N, Cao H, Huang S, Guo Y, Fan W, Zeng J. 2018. The chicken gut metagenome and the modulatory effects of plant-derived benzylisoquinoline alkaloids. Microbiome 6:211. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0590-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lu J, Idris U, Harmon B, Hofacre C, Maurer JJ, Lee MD. 2003. Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6816–6824. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6816-6824.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes RG, Weese J. 2015. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs. BMC Vet Res 11:19. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0335-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Coates ME, Davies MK, Kon SK. 1955. The effect of antibiotics on the intestine of the chick. Br J Nutr 9:110–119. doi: 10.1079/bjn19550016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Madge DS. 1969. Effect of antibiotics on intestinal absorption in mice. Br J Nutr 23:637–646. doi: 10.1079/bjn19690071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang L, Lilburn M, Yu Z. 2016. Intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens as affected by litter management regimens. Front Microbiol 7:593. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Maron D, Smith TJ, Nachman KE. 2013. Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: an international regulatory and economic survey. Global Health 9:48. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Daeseleire E, Van Pamel E, Van Poucke C, Croubels S. 2017. Veterinary drug residues in foods, p 117–153. In Schrenk D, Cartus A (ed), Chemical contaminants and residues in food, 2nd ed. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wise MG, Siragusa GR. 2007. Quantitative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community in one- to three-week-old commercially reared broiler chickens fed conventional or antibiotic-free vegetable-based diets. J Appl Microbiol 102:1138–1149. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dumonceaux TJ, Hill JE, Hemmingsen SM, Van Kessel AG. 2006. Characterization of intestinal microbiota and response to dietary virginiamycin supplementation in the broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2815–2823. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2815-2823.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cressman MD, Yu Z, Nelson MC, Moeller SJ, Lilburn MS, Zerby HN. 2010. Interrelations between the microbiotas in the litter and in the intestines of commercial broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6572–6582. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00180-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar S, Chen C, Indugu N, Werlang GO, Singh M, Kim WK, Thippareddi H. 2018. Effect of antibiotic withdrawal in feed on chicken gut microbial dynamics, immunity, growth performance and prevalence of foodborne pathogens. PLoS One 13:e0192450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nakphaichit M, Thanomwongwattana S, Phraephaisarn C, Sakamoto N, Keawsompong S, Nakayama J, Nitisinprasert S. 2011. The effect of including Lactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5 during post-hatch feeding on the growth and ileum microbiota of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 90:2753–2765. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Palmer MF, Rolls BA. 1983. The activities of some metabolic enzymes in the intestines of germ-free and conventional chicks. Br J Nutr 50:783–790. doi: 10.1079/bjn19830149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Meimandipour A, Shuhaimi M, Hair-Bejo M, Azhar K, Kabeir BM, Rasti B, Yazid AM. 2009. In vitro fermentation of broiler cecal content: the role of lactobacilli and pH value on the composition of microbiota and end products fermentation. Lett Appl Microbiol 49:415–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02674.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pedroso A, Lee M. 2013. Modulation of the intestinal microbiota to improve the productivity of monogastric animals. Albéitar (170):34–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Oakley BB, Lillehoj HS, Kogut MH, Kim WK, Maurer JJ, Pedroso A, Lee MD, Collett SR, Johnson TJ, Cox NA. 2014. The chicken gastrointestinal microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Lett 360:100–112. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cocito C, Chinali G. 1985. Molecular mechanism of action of virginiamycin-like antibiotics (synergimycins) on protein synthesis in bacterial cell-free systems. J Antimicrob Chemother 16(Suppl A):35–52. doi: 10.1093/jac/16.suppl_a.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Le Roy CI, Štšepetova J, Sepp E, Songisepp E, Claus SP, Mikelsaar M. 2015. New insights into the impact of Lactobacillus population on host-bacteria metabolic interplay. Oncotarget 6:30545–30556. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Azad MAK, Sarker M, Li T, Yin J. 2018. Probiotic species in the modulation of gut microbiota: an overview. Biomed Res Int 2018:9478630. doi: 10.1155/2018/9478630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Canani RB, Di Costanzo M, Leone L, Pedata M, Meli R, Calignano A. 2011. Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World J Gastroenterol 17:1519–1528. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i12.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Messaoudi S, Manai M, Kergourlay G, Prévost H, Connil N, Chobert JM, Dousset X. 2013. Lactobacillus salivarius: bacteriocin and probiotic activity. Food Microbiol 36:296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Long M, Yang S, Li P, Song X, Pan J, He J, Zhang Y, Wu R. 2018. Combined use of C. butyricum sx-01 and L. salivarius C-1-3 improves intestinal health and reduces the amount of lipids in serum via modulation of gut microbiota in mice. Nutrients 10:810. doi: 10.3390/nu10070810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dec M, Wernicki A, Puchalski A, Urban-Chmiel R. 2015. Antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus strains isolated from domestic geese. Br Poult Sci 56:416–424. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2015.1058919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mañes-Lázaro R, Van Diemen PM, Pin C, Mayer MJ, Stevens MP, Narbad A. 2017. Administration of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785 to chickens affects colonisation by Campylobacter jejuni and the intestinal microbiota. Br Poult Sci 58:373–381. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1307322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Knarreborg A, Lauridsen C, Engberg RM, Jensen SK. 2004. Dietary antibiotic growth promoters enhance the bioavailability of alpha-tocopheryl acetate in broilers by altering lipid absorption. J Nutr 134:1487–1492. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.6.1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gadde UD, Oh S, Lillehoj HS, Lillehoj EP. 2018. Antibiotic growth promoters virginiamycin and bacitracin methylene disalicylate alter the chicken intestinal metabolome. Sci Rep 8:3592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22004-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 46.Douglas MW, Persia M, Parsons CM. 2003. Impact of galactose, lactose, and Grobiotic-B70 on growth performance and energy utilization when fed to broiler chicks. Poult Sci 82:1596–1601. doi: 10.1093/ps/82.10.1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tang RMY, Cheah IK-M, Yew TSK, Halliwell B. 2018. Distribution and accumulation of dietary ergothioneine and its metabolites in mouse tissues. Sci Rep 8:1601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20021-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhai J, Bo Y, Lu Y, Liu C, Zhang L. 2017. Effects of coenzyme Q10 on markers of inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12:e0170172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abasht B, Mutryn MF, Michalek RD, Lee WR. 2016. Oxidative stress and metabolic perturbations in wooden breast disorder in chickens. PLoS One 11:e0153750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Stromberg ZR, Johnson JR, Fairbrother JM, Kilbourne J, Van Goor A, Curtiss R, Mellata M. 2017. Evaluation of Escherichia coli isolates from healthy chickens to determine their potential risk to poultry and human health. PLoS One 12:e0180599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mysara M, Njima M, Leys N, Raes J, Monsieurs P. 2017. From reads to operational taxonomic units: an ensemble processing pipeline for MiSeq amplicon sequencing data. Gigascience 6(2):1–10. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giw017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2007. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35:7188–7196. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mysara M, Leys N, Raes J, Monsieurs P. 2016. IPED: a highly efficient denoising tool for Illumina MiSeq paired-end 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 17:192. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1061-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mysara M, Saeys Y, Leys N, Raes J, Monsieurs P. 2015. CATCh, an ensemble classifier for chimera detection in 16s rRNA sequencing studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1573–1584. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02896-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM. 2009. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D141–D145. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.White JR, Nagarajan N, Pop M. 2009. Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Eren AM, Maignien L, Sul WJ, Murphy LG, Grim SL, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. 2013. Oligotyping: differentiating between closely related microbial taxa using 16S rRNA gene data. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1111–1119. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber RL, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C. 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814–821. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Caspi R, Billington R, Ferrer L, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Mueller LA, Ong Q, Paley S, Subhraveti P, Weaver DS, Karp PD. 2016. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D471–D480. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG. 2014. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30:3123–3124. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

TABLE S1

AMOVA and ANOSIM analysis of the control group split over day 8, 28, or 39 (D8, D28, and D39, respectively). Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (10.4KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Identification of driving taxa in principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances. Specific OTUs associated with individual coordinates/axes in conducted principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) was determined with an absolute correlation value of >0.7 and a P value of <0.05. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (9.9KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S1

Stacked bar plots of the taxonomic composition of the most abundant OTUs, grouped by day of sacrifice (D8, D28, or D39). Download FIG S1, DOCX file, 0.3 MB (350.7KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Classification of OTUs of interest using oligotyping. OTUs of interest identified to be distinctly associated with control, flavophospholipol, or virginiamycin broilers at day 8, 28, or 39 were classified into distinct types using oligotyping. Taxonomical classification of each identified type was assigned using NCBI nucleotide BLAST. Only hits with a percent identity of ≥97.0% were considered valid. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (11.3KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4

PICRUSt analysis showing distinctly altered pathways in the ileal broiler microbiota in the control (CNTL) group at days 8, 28, and 39 (D8, D28, and D39, respectively). Download Table S4, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (38.6KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Ileal microbial composition evolves with age in untreated broiler chickens (green) and chickens treated with flavophospholipol (FLAV, 15 ppm, orange) and virginiamycin (VIRG, 20 ppm, blue). Differences in microbial composition were visualized using multidimensional scaling analysis of weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances of samples collected at days 8 (D8), 28 (D28), and 39 (D39). The three time points are illustrated using unweighted UniFrac in panel A and weighted UniFrac in panel B. Download FIG S2, DOCX file, 0.6 MB (651.4KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S5

AMOVA and ANOSIM analysis of control (CNTL), flavophospholipol (FLAV), or virginiamycin (VIRG) broilers at days 8, 28, or 39 (D8, D28, and D39, respectively). Download Table S5, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (9.5KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S6

PICRUSt analysis showing distinctly altered pathways in the ileal broiler microbiota in the control (CNTL), flavophospholipol (FLAV), and virginiamycin (VIRG) groups at days 8, 28, and 39 (D8, D28, and D39, respectively). Download Table S6, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (40.4KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Rarefaction curves of sequenced samples within the study. Download FIG S3, DOCX file, 0.2 MB (255.6KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2021 Mysara et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data generated in this study have been made available at the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) on NCBI under project number PRJNA679035.


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES