Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1995 Jul;222(1):19–26. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199507000-00004

Ambulatory surgical management of breast carcinoma using paravertebral block.

C R Weltz 1, R A Greengrass 1, H K Lyerly 1
PMCID: PMC1234750  PMID: 7618963

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors describe an initial experience using paravertebral block for ambulatory or short-stay operations for breast cancer. BACKGROUND: Rising hospital costs have focused attention on limiting the length of stay for patients undergoing surgical treatment of breast cancer. Thus far, ambulatory surgery has been limited by side effects and complications of general anesthesia. Paravertebral block offers the potential benefit of effective analgesia, with limited postoperative nausea and vomiting. METHODS: The medical records of the first 15 patients with breast cancer who underwent 16 major operations for the treatment of breast cancer using paravertebral block were reviewed. Patients were either discharged directly from the recovery room or after overnight hospital admission. The effectiveness of anesthesia, surgical outcome, patient satisfaction, and hospital costs are reviewed. RESULTS: Paravertebral block achieved effective anesthesia for cancer operations of the breast and axilla; conversion to general anesthesia or supplementation with local anesthesia was not required. There was one postoperative hemorrhage, there were two seromas, and there was one superficial wound infection. Sensory block persisted for an average of 23 hours. Postoperative pain was effectively controlled, in fact, nine patients required no postoperative narcotic for pain control. Nausea and vomiting transiently afflicted three patients and prompted overnight observation in one patient originally scheduled for immediate discharge. Fourteen patients (93%) rated their experience as "very satisfactory." CONCLUSION: Breast operations for the surgical management of breast cancer using paravertebral block can be performed safely, with great patient satisfaction, and with potential for significant cost savings.

Full text

PDF
19

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abramson D. J. 857 breast biopsies as an outpatient procedure: delayed mastectomy in 41 malignant cases. Ann Surg. 1966 Mar;163(3):478–483. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196603000-00021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aitken D. R., Minton J. P. Complications associated with mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1983 Dec;63(6):1331–1352. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43192-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen A. M., Schaeffer N., Chen Z. Y., Wood W. C. Early discharge after modified radical mastectomy. Am J Surg. 1986 Apr;151(4):465–466. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90104-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eason M. J., Wyatt R. Paravertebral thoracic block-a reappraisal. Anaesthesia. 1979 Jul-Aug;34(7):638–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06363.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards M. J., Broadwater J. R., Bell J. L., Ames F. C., Balch C. M. Economic impact of reducing hospitalization for mastectomy patients. Ann Surg. 1988 Sep;208(3):330–336. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198809000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirsch J. Impact of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the surgical setting. Anaesthesia. 1994 Jan;49 (Suppl):30–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03580.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang T. T., Parks D. H., Lewis S. R. Outpatient breast surgery under intercostal block anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979 Mar;63(3):299–303. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197903000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Litvak S., Borrero E., Katz R., Munoz E., Wise L. Early discharge of the postmastectomy patient: unbundling of hospital services to improve profitability under DRGs. Am Surg. 1987 Oct;53(10):577–579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nesmith R. L., Herring S. H., Marks M. W., Speight K. L., Efird R. C., Rauck R. L. Early experience with high thoracic epidural anesthesia in outpatient submuscular breast augmentation. Ann Plast Surg. 1990 Apr;24(4):299–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Orr R. K., Ketcham A. S., Robinson D. S., Moffat F. L., Tennant N. D. Early discharge after mastectomy. A safe way of diminishing hospital costs. Am Surg. 1987 Mar;53(3):161–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pedersen S. H., Douville L. M., Eberlein T. J. Accelerated surgical stay programs. A mechanism to reduce health care costs. Ann Surg. 1994 Apr;219(4):374–381. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199404000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peterson D. O. Shoulder block anesthesia for shoulder reconstruction surgery. Anesth Analg. 1985 Mar;64(3):373–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Quinn A. C., Brown J. H., Wallace P. G., Asbury A. J. Studies in postoperative sequelae. Nausea and vomiting--still a problem. Anaesthesia. 1994 Jan;49(1):62–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Romm S., Kennell E., Berggren R. Patient acceptance of intercostal block anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980 Jan;65(1):39–41. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198001000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stein H. D. Ambulatory breast biopsies: the patient's choice. Am Surg. 1982 May;48(5):221–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tejler G., Aspegren K. Complications and hospital stay after surgery for breast cancer: a prospective study of 385 patients. Br J Surg. 1985 Jul;72(7):542–544. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wantz G. E. Ambulatory hernia surgery. Br J Surg. 1989 Dec;76(12):1228–1229. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800761203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wingo P. A., Tong T., Bolden S. Cancer statistics, 1995. CA Cancer J Clin. 1995 Jan-Feb;45(1):8–30. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.45.1.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES