Abstract
Solar-driven atmospheric water harvesting (SAWH) holds significant promise for decentralized water supply. However, its widespread application is hindered by two critical limitations: underutilization of high-humidity adsorption windows during nighttime and insufficient desorption during daytime due to the high desorption temperature requirement of conventional sorbents. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes a composite sorbent strategy by synergistically combining the low enthalpy of vaporization of LiCl with the robust adsorption capacity and stability of a metal‒organic framework (MOF, specifically Ni2Cl2(BTDD), H2BTDD = bis(1H−1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b],[4′,5′-i])dibenzo[1,4]dioxin). This design leverages the complementary properties to achieve lower desorption temperatures (e.g., < 60 oC in device level) compared to typical MOF-based systems (usually >90 oC in device level), thereby significantly reducing the energy consumption for desorption. Concurrently, the composite exhibits extended adsorption duration within the high-humidity window. Field validation across diverse climatic regions demonstrates the composite’s exceptional wide-range environmental stability and performance. The resulting SAWH device achieves a solar-to-water generation improvement up to 91% in a continental field test. This work presents a generalizable and effective pathway for enhancing SAWH performance through synergistic material engineering, enabling efficient water production and thermal control under varying environmental conditions.
Subject terms: Metal-organic frameworks, Solar thermal energy, Mechanical engineering
A composite sorbent combining LiCl with MOF material Ni2Cl2(BTDD) enables high water uptakes while low desorption temperature, achieving solar-driven water yield over 1 L m‒2 day‒1, which has been confirmed in field tests even across diverse regions.
Introduction
More than four billion people worldwide are experiencing a freshwater shortage crisis1, but the atmosphere contains an abundance of water vapor equivalent to six times the total amount of surface rivers and lakes2. Thus, how to convert water vapor in the atmospheric environment into drinkable liquid water has become a research direction of great social significance3,4. Currently, various studies have demonstrated the feasibility of this research direction. According to different technical routes, these explorations can be roughly divided into three different typical technical routes5,6: the dew-based atmospheric water harvesting (AWH), which reduces water vapor to below the dew point temperature; the fog capture method, which can be used when the water vapor is close to saturation7,8; and sorption-based AWH9,10. Among them, the sorption-based AWH has received widespread attention due to its ability to better adapt to different humidity environments and its ability to be powered by low-grade energy sources represented by solar energy and waste heat11–13. This technology utilizes the adsorption process of adsorbents to capture atmospheric water vapor, which is then desorbed by the adsorbent driven by heat sources such as solar energy14,15. The desorbed water vapor can be condensed in the condensation chamber at a temperature higher than the ambient temperature, thereby achieving the conversion of water vapor to liquid water16,17.
To address freshwater scarcity in both arid and humid regions3, it is necessary to develop highly efficient solar-driven AWH systems with broad climatic adaptability. Many studies have focused on the development of adsorbents, such as metal‒organic frameworks (MOFs)18,19, hydrogels20–22, silica gel-based adsorbents23,24, etc. Among various adsorbents, MOFs have the advantages of large specific surface areas and fast water sorption kinetics, which have received wide attention11,25. Nevertheless, their water harvesting capacity is often limited by the pore volume. To the best of our knowledge, traditional inorganic hygroscopic salts, represented by LiCl and CaCl2, exhibit exceptionally high water uptake capacity due to their deliquescence property, which enables a solid-to-liquid phase transition under high-humidity conditions22,26,27. However, they frequently suffer from issues like leakage and poor cycling stability caused by agglomeration13,22,28. Therefore, constructing a composite that synergizes the high capacity of inorganic salts and the rapid kinetics of MOFs presents a promising strategy for developing high-performance AWH systems.
As far as we know, composites between hygroscopic salts and MOFs (e.g., LiCl@MIL-10129, LiCl@UiO-6630, CaCl2@MOF-80831) can increase adsorption capacity, and the low enthalpy of vaporization of the confined LiCl solution helps to lower the activation temperature. However, their water uptakes were no more than 0.77 g g‒1 at 30% relative humidity (RH) and no more than 2.56 g g‒1 at 80% RH (Supplementary Table 1), which might be ascribed to the lack of strong binding sites for Li+ and Cl‒ simultaneously in their original MOF structures. While we noticed that the MOF Ni2Cl2(BTDD) (H2BTDD = bis(1H−1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b],[4′,5′-i])dibenzo[1,4]dioxin) not only exhibits outstanding performance of water capture (Supplementary Fig. 1), but also the completely exposed Ni2+ and Cl‒ sites on the pore channels should be suitable binding sites for stabilizing Cl‒ and Li+, respectively (Fig. 1a, b and Supplementary Fig. 2), which would be helpful to increase the adsorption capacity (details see the section of “Advantages of Ni2Cl2(BTDD) as the matrix material” in Supplementary Information).
Fig. 1. Performance characterization of MOF-based composite adsorbent.
Schematic diagrams of a Ni2Cl2(BTDD) and b hypothetical LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD) structures (Purple, green, gray, blue, and red nodes represent the Ni, Cl, C, N, and O atoms, respectively. Orange represents LiCl inside the pores. H atoms are omitted for clarify). c N2 (77 K) sorption isotherms of Ni2Cl2(BTDD) and LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)_30 (Inset: the pore-size distribution). d Water adsorption isotherms of LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)_30 at 30 °C showing multi-step sorption processes during water capture phase. Step 1: Water uptake rapidly increases at P/P0 < 0.11 as a result of the chemisorption of active LiCl with increasing humidity; Step 2: Water uptake sharply increases, caused by the deliquescence of LiCl·H2O at P/P0 = 0.11; Step 3: Water uptake slowly increases due to the absorption of LiCl solution at P/P0 > 0.11. e Adsorption/desorption kinetic profiles of the material under adsorption conditions (30 °C, 80% RH) and desorption conditions (80 °C, 3.6% RH). f Multi-cycle stability test of the material under adsorption conditions (30 °C, 80% RH) and desorption conditions (80 °C, 3.6% RH).
On the device level, numerous studies have validated the AWH system based on MOF adsorbent materials. For example, in arid environments such as deserts, the desorption process of adsorbents can be achieved by using concentrated light29,32, solar vacuum tubes33,34, electric heating19,35, and other forms to increase the desorption temperature. At the same time, fans, cooling systems and other methods can be used to lower the condensation temperature and promote the condensation process of water vapor35,36. Among various system forms, the AWH system driven by photothermal energy has attracted extensive attention because it does not require a power system or energy storage equipment and can better meet the requirements for off-grid deployment9,32. However, there are two main challenges in the practical application of this system: the matching problem between the low desorption temperature conditions in actual use and the high-humidity adsorption conditions at night37. For this type of system, to reduce or avoid the intervention of the power control system, an operation strategy of adsorption at night and desorption during the day is often adopted18,33. Nevertheless, the irradiation during daytime desorption fluctuates and is often lower than the common desorption test conditions (1000 W m‒2). Therefore, in this context, how to sufficiently match the adsorption and desorption conditions under natural environments to achieve water production enhancement has become a critical challenge. Besides, the common adsorption process cannot achieve flexible use of the nighttime adsorption time, that is, continuous adsorption at night through ultra-high adsorption capacity.
Herein, we used Ni2Cl2(BTDD) as the matrix and uniformly loaded LiCl with different concentrations on the internal skeleton of the material by impregnation. By virtue of multiple advantages of uniform dispersion of hygroscopic salts in the pore channel, and low desorption temperature due to the low enthalpy of vaporization of the confined LiCl solution, the prepared composite materials exhibit ultra-high water adsorption capacity under low desorption temperature. We conducted comparative tests using the same system architecture as existing research under the same operating conditions14. Furthermore, the constructed device with MOF-composite achieved a water yield of up to 1 L m‒2 under 1-sun conditions, and the water production per unit area could increase by 50% compared to the Ni2Cl2(BTDD)-based device in outdoor experiments at different locations.
Results
Synthesis and characterizations of LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)
The composite adsorbent LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)_x (x = 10/20/30/40, representing different LiCl solutions) was prepared using a scalable impregnation method in different mass concentrations (wt%) of LiCl solution at room temperature (see “Methods” section for preparation of Ni2Cl2(BTDD) and LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)). This approach requires neither pressurization nor ultra-high-temperature operations, with mild reaction conditions enabling effortless large-scale material preparation. Notably, the formulation of 30 wt% LiCl solution, i.e., LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)_30 was chosen for the key structural characteristics and the final device (Supplementary Figs. 3–5), because it enables a synergistic balance of the high water adsorption capacity and fast adsorption kinetics (details see the section “MOF-composite with varying LiCl solution concentrations” in the Supplementary Information).
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses collectively indicated the successful loading of LiCl within the internal pore channels of the MOF material via the impregnation method (Supplementary Figs. 6–7). N2 adsorption isotherms of Ni2Cl2(BTDD) at 77 K (Fig. 1c) demonstrated that the pore volume (1.18 cm3 g–1) and Brunauer‒Emmett‒Teller (BET) surface area of 1839 m2 g–1 (Supplementary Fig. 8), close to the literature reference38. Furthermore, a sharp pore size distribution centered at 2.20 nm for Ni2Cl2(BTDD) (Fig. 1a, c) aligns well with the value reported in the literature38. As a contrast, LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)_30 showed a significantly lower pore volume (0.35 cm3 g–1) and BET surface area (504 m2 g–1, Supplementary Fig. 8), which may be due to the occupation of LiCl in the pores. Furthermore, the composite material shows a broader distribution centered at approximately 1.66 nm (Fig. 1c). This significant reduction in pore diameter by about 0.54 nm indicated the formation of a monolayer of LiCl on the internal pore surface (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2). In addition, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) indicated that the LiCl to Ni2Cl2(BTDD) molar ratio is approximately 14:1 (Supplementary Table 2), and the distribution of LiCl in MOF pores was confirmed by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) for LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)_30 (Supplementary Fig. 9).
Furthermore, the water sorption isotherms of LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)_30 composite sorbent show a distinctive three-step adsorption behavior (Fig. 1d), including salt chemisorption, deliquescence, and solution absorption at different water vapor pressures39. Notably, the material exhibited exceptionally high adsorption capacities under high-humidity conditions, with high water uptake reaching 3.46 g g‒1 at 30 °C and 80% RH, and 1.72 g g‒1 at 30 °C and 50% RH. Such high water uptake should be attributed to the deliquescence of LiCl29–31. To further investigate the desorption performance of the material, we systematically evaluated the desorption behavior at different temperatures (Fig. 1e). The results showed that the developed sorbent can achieve 94.7% desorption of the water uptake at temperatures as low as 60 °C (Supplementary Fig. 10). Subsequently, multi-cycle performance and stability tests showed that the adsorbent maintained a water vapor uptake consistently exceeding 3 g g‒1 over 10 cycles (as shown in Fig. 1f).
Construction of a modular photothermal-driven AWH system
Considering the application scenarios of solar-driven AWH, this adsorbent material exhibits significant advantages, particularly in arid regions, relative humidity at nighttime can exceed 50% even in dry environments, posing higher requirements for adsorbents to fully utilize long humidity windows of 8‒10 h duration daily (Supplementary Fig. 11, detailed climatic data analysis, please refer to the section: “Climatic data of typical arid and semi-arid regions” in Supplementary Information). While advanced adsorbents are crucial for AWH performance, their potential can only be fully realized through coordinated device-level optimization. Solar-driven AWH system works by alternating between nighttime vapor adsorption and daytime desorption, leveraging the natural day-night cycle. The daytime operation of AWH, which integrates sorbent desorption and vapor condensation, presents a fundamental thermal dilemma: desorption is favored at high temperatures, whereas condensation requires a cold surface (Fig. 2a, for a detailed thermodynamic AWH analysis, please see Supplementary Fig. 12 in the section on Device design and thermal management strategies in Supplementary Information. Driven by this critical insight into the process’s thermal demands, we engineered a highly compact and modular AWH system specifically to decouple these different temperature requirements. This system features a modular design, where the entire panel is composed of 4 cm × 4 cm adsorbent modules (Fig. 2b), and the detailed design drawings are provided in Supplementary Figs. 13 and 14. Such modularity enables flexible adaptation to diverse practical needs and facilitates system scalability for expanded applications. The device mainly consists of two core components: an integrated solar-thermal driven adsorption bed and a thermally enhanced condenser with dual-layer insulated mass transfer plates. Dual-layer insulated mass transfer plates (Fig. 2c) achieve thermal demand decoupling between condensation and desorption through internal thermal partitioning, which can effectively isolate thermal radiation and weaken convection.
Fig. 2. Photothermal-driven AWH device and laboratory testing.
a Working principle of the proposed AWH device. b 3D model of the AWH device. Components 1–5: 1. Double-layer insulation; 2. Photothermal panel; 3. Modular adsorption bed; 4. Dual-layer mass transfer plate; 5. Integrated condensation chamber. c Internal structure and thermal radiation attenuation mechanism. d Variation of water yield during a 7-h experiment. e Temporal variation of temperature distribution characteristics. 1–4: 1. Photothermal plate of MOF-based device. 2. Photothermal plate of the MOF composite-based device. 3. Condensation chamber of MOF composite-based device. 4. Fins of the MOF composite-based device. f Desorbed water vapor and water yield in cyclic testing (cycles 4–12). Adsorption condition: 30 °C and 80% RH. Desorption condition: 30 °C and 35% RH, with irradiation intensity of 1000 W m‒2.
We conducted laboratory performance tests in the climate chamber (water yield data as shown in Fig. 2d). Experimental results showed that under the system’s operating conditions, the increased water vapor desorption induced a sweating cooling effect. This phenomenon manifested as a temperature drop of over 10 °C (83.6 vs. 97.9 °C in Fig. 2e) on the photothermal panel through the cooling output generated by the adsorbent desorption process. These findings indicate that compared to Ni2Cl2(BTDD)-based device, MOF-composite possesses lower desorption temperatures and greater working capacity. Within 7 h, the device produced more than 1 L of liquid water per square meter in total (Fig. 2d), and the thermal efficiency increased by 25% compared with that before the salt composite. Based on this strategy, the proposed device achieves an ultrahigh volumetric water harvesting capacity of 30.3 L m‒3, ranking among the highest levels reported to date for existing diurnal solar energy-driven AWH devices9,10,15,32,40–43 (for a detailed device performance comparison, please see Supplementary Table 2).
In addition, the working conditions adopted in the experiment were the light intensity equivalent to noon sunlight commonly used in existing literature. However, considering the variation of daytime irradiation, such continuous high-intensity irradiation conditions do not last for 7 h. Therefore, the adsorbent must adapt to a lower desorption temperature to meet the actual needs. According to our analysis, the composite strategy we proposed can achieve high-performance desorption at a lower desorption temperature through simple salt hygroscopic factor compounding. Tests under varying irradiation and humidity conditions demonstrate that the device equipped with the developed MOF-composite sorbent achieves strong performance across a wide range of climatic conditions (Supplementary Fig. 15 and Supplementary Table 3 shown in Supplementary Information, section on “Performance of the proposed AWH system under different operating conditions”). Notably, it produced a high water yield exceeding 500 g m‒2 even under a low irradiation intensity of just 400 W m‒2. The system developed based on this strategy thus has greater practical application value. We conducted multi-cycle tests at the device level to verify the stability of the combination for the material and system (Fig. 2f). The results of 12-cycle tests at the device level showed that the system could operate stably under the test conditions. During the laboratory cycling tests, the proposed device consistently achieved a water production yield of approximately 42 g, while maintaining a water vapor recovery rate above 90% (see the section of “Multiple cycling performance tests” in Supplementary Information), indicating that the system is capable of stable operation.
Comparative field testing across different climatic regions
To better evaluate the performance of the constructed system in different real-world application scenarios, we conducted field experiments under various climatic conditions in Shanghai (31.0271° N, 121.4460° E), Jinan (36.6599° N, 117.2334° E), and Kunming (24.8644° N, 102.8586° E). During each experiment, all test conditions (including pure powder and composite adsorbent systems) were kept identical, and no auxiliary equipment was used, as shown in Fig. 3a. All tests were performed under consistent protocols; both the MOF-composite and Ni2Cl2(BTDD) systems were evaluated in parallel without any auxiliary equipment.
Fig. 3. Outdoor experiments.
a Diagram of outdoor experimental setup. b Temperature data of key components in Shanghai experiments (October 3, 2022). 1–4: 1. Photothermal plate of MOF-based device. 2. Photothermal plate of the MOF composite-based device. 3. Condensation chamber of MOF composite-based device. 4. Fins of the MOF composite-based device. c Climatic data from Shanghai outdoor experiments (October 1–3, 2022). d Nighttime adsorption data and water collected on October 1 from Shanghai experiments (Inset: Water collected in the test).
Outdoor experiments demonstrated that the MOF-composite system consistently outperformed the pure MOF device under varied climatic conditions (Table 1). In Shanghai and Jinan, representing moderate-to-high humidity environments, the composite system collected nearly 50% more water, with the most enhancement observed in Jinan (over 90% increase in water yield). Even under the low-temperature winter conditions of Kunming, the MOF-composite system still achieved effective water production, confirming its broad applicability.
Table. 1.
Performance in field tests
| Location | Season | Climate regions | Water desorbed (MOF-composite based system) (g) | Water yield (MOF-composite based system) (g) | Collecting ratio (%) | Water yield (MOF-based system) (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai | Autumn | Humid Subtropical | 34.09 | 32.61 | 96 | 22.29 |
| Jinan | Summer | Continental | 29.89 | 27.8 | 93 | 14.45 |
| Kunming | Winter | Subtropical Highland | 23.84 | 18.67 | 94 | 16.57 |
A detailed analysis of site-specific performance revealed several key advantages of the proposed MOF-composite material. In Shanghai, the experiment lasted three days (temperature data of the tests on October 3 is shown in Fig. 3b), with no electrical auxiliary equipment used throughout the process. The final experimental results demonstrate that the proposed device with MOF-composite exhibits superior adaptability to daily cycling operations. Under the conditions of a daily maximum solar irradiance of 0.8 sun and an ambient temperature of 33 °C, the maximum driving heat source temperature provided by the photothermal plate is approximately 85 °C, and the duration during which the temperature exceeds 80 °C throughout the day is about 5 h (Fig. 3b). Experimental observations showed that liquid water could appear in the water collection bottle around 9:30 a.m., 1 h earlier than the Ni2Cl2(BTDD)-based device, which started to produce water around 10:30 a.m. This indicates that the device improved by the composite material strategy can achieve desorption under lower-RH environmental conditions. Meanwhile, we observed the same phenomenon as in laboratory experiments: the composite adsorbent exhibits higher water vapor desorption capacity, thereby providing greater cooling capacity for photothermal components. Compared to the MOF-based device, the solar thermal panel with MOF-composite demonstrated a temperature reduction effect of approximately 10 °C during testing.
It also extended the effective adsorption period, fully utilizing the high nighttime humidity and achieving continuous moisture capture (Fig. 3d). Different from the Ni2Cl2(BTDD)-based device, which reaches adsorption saturation around 11 p.m. at lower water uptake, the proposed device with MOF-composite fully utilizes the high-humidity environment at night, thereby achieving the ability of potential continuous adsorption at night. Compared to the Ni2Cl2(BTDD)-based device, the device with MOF-composite achieves ~46% higher water vapor adsorption and desorption capacity (detailed data and analysis can be found in Supplementary Information, section of “Outdoor experimental details” in Shanghai) while realizing precise mass matching between adsorption and desorption phases, thereby enabling stable water production from 30.2 to 32.6 g day‒1. Furthermore, outdoor testing results confirmed the operational stability of the proposed device with the MOF-composite. These comparisons also demonstrate that utilizing the composite adsorbent’s characteristics of low desorption temperature and high adsorption capacity enables adaptation to variations in operating conditions through both desorption and adsorption pathways, thereby effectively enhancing system efficiency. To verify the reliability of field data, we further replicated Shanghai’s stable noon conditions during the second day in the climatic chamber, which confirmed consistent temperature trends and performance metrics between indoor and outdoor settings (Supplementary Fig. 17).
The experimental results have been further validated in different climatic regions, as exemplified by Jinan and Kunming (Supplementary Fig. 18). In Jinan, despite lower ambient and photothermal temperatures (~10 °C below that in Shanghai as shown in Supplementary Fig. 18a), the composite device nearly doubled the water yield of the pure MOF system, highlighting its superior performance under suboptimal solar irradiation (Supplementary Fig. 18b). In Kunming during winter. The results demonstrated that the adsorption material achieved high-performance liquid water production at a driving temperature as low as 60 °C (Supplementary Fig. 18c, d), corresponding to a saturated vapor pressure only one-third of that at 85 °C (19.923 vs. 57.875 kPa). In previous studies, the required heat source temperature often exceeded 90 °C due to impaired heat and mass transfer during actual system formation13,15,18,35. Thus, this composite strategy can better enhance the applicability of AWH under conditions of low irradiation and heat source temperatures.
Collectively, the field tests validate that the MOF-composite significantly enhances solar-to-water generation across diverse climates. The solar-driven AWH system operates by utilizing low-grade solar thermal energy to desorb at a lower temperature, thereby achieving the transformation of water vapor into liquid water. Consequently, the improvement in water collection efficiency reflects an overall enhancement in energy efficiency. Specifically, the efficiency improvement reached 91% in Jinan under a continental climate, while an average enhancement of approximately 50% was achieved in medium-to-high humidity regions such as Shanghai and Jinan. These results collectively underscore the significant potential of synergizing MOF-derived composite sorbents with advanced thermal management in AWH devices.
Water quality analysis
The analysis of water quality indicates that, within the allowable precision range of testing instruments (details of testing instruments are introduced in Supplementary Information: Details of water ion concentration analysis), the ion concentration of the proposed water sample is identical to that of distilled water. No lithium ions or nickel ions were detected, confirming its suitability for direct consumption. This result demonstrates that the collected water originates entirely from the condensation of water vapor generated during the desorption process on the condenser walls (as shown in Table 2). Furthermore, it confirms the absence of salt leakage throughout the process.
Table. 2.
Water quality test indicators for harvested water
| Li | Ni | Al | Ca | Fe | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvested water | Undetected | Undetected | Undetected | Undetected | Undetected | |
| WHO standard | NA | 0.02 mg·L‒1 | 0.2 mg·L‒1 | NA | 0.3 mg·L‒1 | |
| Detection limit | 0.0008 mg·L‒1 | 0.0005 mg·L‒1 | 0.003 mg·L‒1 | 0.002 mg·L‒1 | 0.001 mg·L‒1 | |
Discussion
To improve the efficiency of the solar-driven AWH system, we propose a strategy of introducing hygroscopic salts to construct composite adsorbents, achieving enhanced dynamic adaptability and desorption performance for MOF materials under varying humidity conditions. The composite sorbent based on the selected Ni2Cl2(BTDD) offers multiple advantages. First, it significantly reduces the required desorption temperature at the system level. Moreover, the encapsulation of LiCl within its porous structure promotes uniform dispersion of the salt, thereby improving heat and mass transfer efficiency. Furthermore, this structure effectively prevents the aggregation, leakage, or migration of LiCl under high-humidity conditions. The developed composite achieves near-complete desorption at 60 °C and delivers higher water uptake with increasing humidity, offering ideal properties for broad environmental compatibility. The field results in different locations show that the proposed system with MOF-composite can achieve high-performance water vapor production at the system level with a driving temperature of only 60 °C and boost the water harvesting efficiency by up to 91% under the operating conditions in Jinan. These experimental data indicate that by using the proposed environment-adaptive strategy, the composite sorbent can better adapt to the benefits brought by increased humidity and longer moisture absorption time in the future.
Methods
Synthesis of MOF
The synthesis of Ni2Cl2(BTDD) was according to the method in the literature19.
Synthesis of LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)
We initially synthesized the MOF material Ni2Cl2(BTDD) via a reflux synthesis method based on previously reported preparation protocols, followed by drying the obtained product. The dried MOF powder was then immersed in a 10/20/30/40 wt% LiCl (Anhydrous LiCl with AR ≥ 99.0% was purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.) solution for a 24-h impregnation treatment. Magnetic stirring was applied during the impregnation process to ensure sufficient penetration of the LiCl solution into the MOF pores. The resulting solution was then centrifuged at 1000 rpm (10,619 × g) to achieve preliminary solid-liquid separation, with the material precipitating at the bottom of the centrifuge tubes. Centrifugation was performed for 10 min to ensure complete phase separation. The separated material was subsequently dried at 80 °C to obtain the final composite adsorbent LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD). For ease of description, we named the MOF composite material immersed in a 10/20/30/40 wt% LiCl solution as LiCl@Ni2Cl2(BTDD)_10/20/30/40, respectively.
Design of AWH prototype
We constructed a branch biomimetic AWH device using inexpensive and reliable 304 stainless steel as the raw material. We have detailed the device’s design drawings and usage details in Supplementary Information: Design schematics of the AWH device and the insulated mass transfer plate.
Experimental details
We used an electronic recorder (TP1000 paperless recorder from SHENZHEN TOPRIE ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.) to record the temperature data during the process. In SI, we have also described some key experimental details and photos taken during the tests, and other experimental information can be provided upon request.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nos. 524B2093, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos. 22231012 and 22475240.
Author contributions
R.W., J.P.Z., and D.D.Z. supervised and led this research. Z.S., X.F., and H.W. designed the experiments and processed the data. S.D., X.F., W.Y.S., Z.S.W., B.J., and H.L. performed experiments. P.P. revised the article. D.D.Z. and R.W. revised the article and optimized the experimental process. All authors discussed the experiments and results.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Zhao Shao, Xi Feng.
Contributor Information
Dong-Dong Zhou, Email: zhoudd3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Jie-Peng Zhang, Email: zhangjp7@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Ruzhu Wang, Email: rzwang@sjtu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-68946-8.
References
- 1.Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci. Adv.2, e1500323 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li, R., Shi, Y., Shi, L., Alsaedi, M. & Wang, P. Harvesting water from air: using anhydrous salt with sunlight. Environ. Sci. Technol.52, 5398–5406 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lord, J. et al. Global potential for harvesting drinking water from air using solar energy. Nature598, 611–617 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lei, C. et al. Polyzwitterionic hydrogels for efficient atmospheric water harvesting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202200271 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tu, Y., Wang, R., Zhang, Y. & Wang, J. Progress and expectation of atmospheric water harvesting. Joule2, 1452–1475 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nishad, S., Elmoughni, H. M. & Krupa, I. Advancements in radiative cooling structures for atmospheric water harvesting: a comprehensive review. Appl. Energy377, 124576 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gao, S. & Wang, Z. Capture fog for clean water. Nat. Sustain.6, 1514–1515 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shi, W., Anderson, M. J., Tulkoff, J. B., Kennedy, B. S. & Boreyko, J. B. Fog harvesting with harps. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces10, 11979 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim, H. et al. Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight. Science356, 430–434 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim, H. et al. Adsorption-based atmospheric water harvesting device for arid climates. Nat. Commun.9, 1191 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hanikel, N., Prévot, M. & Yaghi, O. M. MOF water harvesters. Nat. Nanotechnol.15, 1–8 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Song, W., Zheng, Z., Alawadhi, A. H. & Yaghi, O. M. MOF water harvester produces water from Death Valley desert air in ambient sunlight. Nat. Water1, 626–634 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shan, H. et al. Exceptional water production yield enabled by batch-processed portable water harvester in semi-arid climate. Nat. Commun.13, 5406 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shao, Z. et al. High-performance solar-driven MOF AWH device with ultra-dense integrated modular design and reflux synthesis of Ni2Cl2(BTDD). Device1, 100058 (2023).
- 15.LaPotin, A. et al. Dual-stage atmospheric water harvesting device for scalable solar-driven water production. Joule5, 166–182 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu, W. & Yaghi, O. M. Metal–organic frameworks for water harvesting from air, anywhere, anytime. ACS Cent. Sci.6, 1348–1354 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shan, H. et al. Hygroscopic salt-embedded composite materials for sorption-based atmospheric water harvesting. Nat. Rev. Mater.9, 699–721 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fathieh, F. et al. Practical water production from desert air. Sci. Adv.4, eaat3198 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shao, Z. et al. Modular all-day continuous thermal-driven atmospheric water harvester with rotating adsorption strategy. Appl. Phys. Rev. 10, 041409 (2023).
- 20.Yang, X., Chen, Z., Xiang, C., Shan, H. & Wang, R. Enhanced continuous atmospheric water harvesting with scalable hygroscopic gel driven by natural sunlight and wind. Nat. Commun.15, 7678 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lu, H. et al. Tailoring the desorption behavior of hygroscopic gels for atmospheric water harvesting in arid climates. Adv. Mater.34, 2205344 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shan, H. et al. All-day multicyclic atmospheric water harvesting enabled by polyelectrolyte hydrogel with hybrid desorption mode. Adv. Mater.35, 2302038 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shao, Z. et al. Scaled solar-driven atmospheric water harvester with low-cost composite sorbent. Energy302, 131917 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li, Q. et al. An atmospheric water harvesting system based on the “Optimal Harvesting Window” design for worldwide water production. Sci. Bull.69, 1437–1447 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kalmutzki, M. J., Diercks, C. S. & Yaghi, O. M. Metal–organic frameworks for water harvesting from Air. Adv. Mater.30, 1704304 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu, Y. et al. Solar-mechano symbiosis dual-mode janus bioaerogel for context-adaptive atmospheric water harvesting beyond solar reliance. Adv. Mater. 37, e12244 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Wilson, C. T., Díaz-Marín, C. D., Colque, J. P., Mooney, J. P. & El Fil, B. Solar-driven atmospheric water harvesting in the Atacama Desert through physics-based optimization of a hygroscopic hydrogel device. Device3, 100798 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guo, Y. et al. Scalable super hygroscopic polymer films for sustainable moisture harvesting in arid environments. Nat. Commun.13, 2761 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xu, J. et al. Efficient solar-driven water harvesting from arid air with metal–organic frameworks modified by hygroscopic salt. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59, 5202–5210 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sun, Y. et al. Tunable LiCl@UiO-66 composites for water sorption-based heat transformation applications. J. Mater. Chem. A.8, 13364–13375 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 31.An, H. et al. High-performance solar-driven water harvesting from air with a cheap and scalable hygroscopic salt modified metal–organic framework. Chem. Eng. J.461, 141955 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li, R., Shi, Y., Wu, M., Hong, S. & Wang, P. Improving atmospheric water production yield: enabling multiple water harvesting cycles with nano sorbent. Nano Energy67, 104255 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Deng, F. et al. Ultra-high-yield solar-driven modular atmospheric water harvester with improved heat management. Device2, 100441 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li, T. et al. Scalable and efficient solar-driven atmospheric water harvesting enabled by bidirectionally aligned and hierarchically structured nanocomposites. Nat. Water1, 971–981 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hanikel, N. et al. Rapid cycling and exceptional yield in a metal-organic framework water harvester. ACS Cent. Sci.5, 1699–1706 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Almassad, H. A., Abaza, R. I., Siwwan, L., Al-Maythalony, B. & Cordova, K. E. Environmentally adaptive MOF-based device enables continuous self-optimizing atmospheric water harvesting. Nat. Commun.13, 4873 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Poredoš, P., Shan, H., Wang, C., Deng, F. & Wang, R. Sustainable water generation: grand challenges in continuous atmospheric water harvesting. Energy Environ. Sci.15, 3223–3235 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rieth, A. J. et al. Record-setting sorbents for reversible water uptake by systematic anion exchanges in metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 13858–13866 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang, R., Wang, L. & Wu, J. Adsorption Refrigeration Technology: Theory and Application (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).
- 40.Song, Y. et al. High-yield solar-driven atmospheric water harvesting of metal–organic-framework-derived nanoporous carbon with fast-diffusion water channels. Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 857–863 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang, J. et al. Water harvesting from the atmosphere in arid areas with manganese dioxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett.7, 48–53 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu, Q., Su, W., Li, Q., Tao, Y. & Li, H. Enabling continuous and improved solar-driven atmospheric water harvesting with Ti3C2-incorporated metal–organic framework monoliths. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.13, 38906–38915 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Deng, F., Wang, C., Xiang, C. & Wang, R. Bioinspired topological design of super hygroscopic complex for cost-effective atmospheric water harvesting. Nano Energy90, 106642 (2021). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.



